Accuracy Of Endorectal Ultrasonography Research Articles

EARLY RECTAL CANCER: LOCAL EXCISION OR TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION?

AIM of this study was to improve treatment outcomes for early rectal cancer; to assess the accuracy of endorectal ultrasound (ERUS) in preoperative staging of early rectal cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS. A total of 42 patients of the main prospective group with early rectal cancer underwent transanal local excision (LE). In control retrospective group 39 patients underwent radical resection with total mesorectal excision (TME). Operation time, perioperative, hospital stay duration long-term oncological results (overall and local recurrence-free survival, cancer-free survival, distant metastasis rate) were analyzed.. Comparison of ERUS preoperative staging for prospective group and pathological staging was performed to identify the accuracy of ERUS. RESULTS. Median follow-up for prospective group was 41 (from 10 to 60) months. In comparison with TME, LE was associated with fewer morbid (4,8 % vs 17,9 %, p=0,04). There was no hospital mortality in both groups. The accuracy of ERUS was 88,1 % for Tis and 78,6% for T1. There was no significant statistical difference in 1-year and 3-year in oncological outcomes between groups (p=1,0). There was one local recurrence (2,6%) in 6 months after LE in a patient with pT1sm3 who had previously refused surgery. This patient underwent TME. There was no detected distant metastasis in both groups. The 3-year overall survival was 100 % for LE and 97,4 % for TME. The 3-year cancer-specific survival was 100 % in both groups. CONCLUSIONS. LE has advantages over TME in short-term results; long-term oncological results after LE are comparable with TME. ERUS has a good diagnostic effectiveness in preoperative staging of early rectal cancer.

Evaluating local lymph node metastasis with magnetic resonance imaging, endoluminal ultrasound and computed tomography in rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), endorectal ultrasound (EUS) and computed tomography (CT) are commonly used to evaluate lymph node (LN) metastasis for rectal cancer, but there is no agreement on which form of imaging is most accurate. The study aimed to review systematically the diagnostic performance of the three imaging modalities. The PubMed, Cochrane Library and EMBASE databases were systematically searched for English and Chinese language studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of MRI, EUS and/or CT for evaluating LN metastasis. Papers published before 31 December 2013 were included in the search. Subject-level data were included. Diagnostic odds ratios were calculated for each modality and summary receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed using hierarchical regression models. The performance of the three modalities was compared. The analysis included data from 123 studies evaluating LN metastasis. The sensitivity and specificity in patients having no chemoradiotherapy were 0.77 and 0.76 for MRI, 0.57 and 0.80 for EUS and 0.79 and 0.76 for CT. The three modalities showed similar accuracy (P=0.39). MRI showed higher accuracy than EUS for patients who received neoadjuvant therapy (P=0.04). MRI at a field strength >1.5T yielded better performance than EUS (P=0.03) and similar performance to CT (P=0.17). High resolution MRI showed similar diagnostic accuracy to EUS (P=0.18) and CT (P=0.16). MRI, EUS and CT show similar accuracy but none could provide reliable evaluation for LN metastasis. MRI rather than EUS is recommended for LN evaluation after neoadjuvant therapy. MRI at a field strength of 3.0T is the recommended method for MRI examination. But high resolution MRI does not improve the diagnostic performance in evaluating LN metastasis.

Diagnostic Value of Endorectal Ultrasound in Preoperative Assessment of Lymph Node Involvement in Colorectal Cancer: a Meta-analysis.

Nodal invasion by colorectal cancer is a critical determinant in estimating patient survival and in choosing appropriate preoperative treatment. The present meta-analysis was designed to evaluate the diagnostic value of endorectal ultrasound (EUS) in preoperative assessment of lymph node involvement in colorectal cancer. We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases for relevant studies published on or before December 10th, 2014. The sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and area under the summary receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) were assessed to estimate the diagnostic value of EUS. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression were performed to explore heterogeneity across studies. Thirty-three studies covering 3,016 subjects were included. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.69 (95%CI: 0.63-0.75) and 0.77 (95%CI: 0.73-0.82), respectively. The positive and negative likelihood ratios were 3.09 (95%CI: 2.52-3.78) and 0.39 (95%CI: 0.32-0.48), respectively. The DOR was 7.84 (95%CI: 5.56-11.08), and AUC was 0.80 (95%CI: 0.77-0.84). This meta-analysis indicated that EUS has moderate diagnostic value in preoperative assessment of lymph node involvement in colorectal cancer. Further refinements in technology and diagnostic criteria are necessary to improve the diagnostic accuracy of EUS.

The accuracy of endorectal ultrasonography in rectal cancer staging.

Background and aimsThe incidence of rectal cancer in the European Union is about 35% of the total colorectal cancer incidence. Staging rectal cancer is important for planning treatment. It is essential for the management of rectal cancer to have adequate preoperative imaging, because accurate staging can influence the therapeutic strategy, type of resection, and candidacy for neoadjuvant therapy. The aim of this work is to evaluate the accuracy of endorectal ultrasound (ERUS) in rectal cancer staging.MethodsA retrospective study was performed to assess the accuracy of ERUS by analyzing patients discharged from Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (IRGH) Cluj-Napoca, Romania, diagnosed with rectal cancer between 01 January 2011 and 31 December 2013. Patients who were preoperatively staged by other imaging methods and those who had ERUS performed in another service were excluded from the analysis. As inclusion criteria remained ERUS performed for patients with rectal cancer in IRGH Cluj-Napoca where they were also operated. We analyzed preoperative T stage obtained by ERUS and it was compared with the histopathology findings.ResultsThe number of patients discharged with a diagnosis of rectal cancer were 200 (operated – 157) in 2011, 193 (operated – 151) in 2012, and 198 (operated – 142) in 2013. We analyzed a total of 51 cases diagnosed with rectal cancer who performed ERUS in IRGH Cluj-Napoca. The results according to the T stage obtained by ERUS and histopathology test were:Under-stage T2= 25.0%, T3=7.9% of cases;Over-stage T2=25.0%, T3=31.6% and T4=60.0% of cases.Less than 20% of patients underwent preoperative radio-chemotherapy.ConclusionsERUS is a method of staging rectal cancer which is human dependent. ERUS is less accurate for T staging of stenotic tumours, but the accuracy may still be within acceptable limits. Surgeons use ERUS to adopt a treatment protocol, knowing the risk of under-staging and over-staging of this method. The accuracy of ERUS is higher in diagnosing rectal cancer in stages T1, T2 and even in stage T3 with malignant tumor which is not occlusive. ERUS is less accurate for T staging of locally advanced and stenotic tumours.

Ultrasonography Accuracy for Perianal Fistula Anatomy

Background Endorectal ultrasonography is a diagnostic modality for evaluation of perianal pathologies and suitable surgical planning, especially in perianal fistula, due to its close relation to the anal sphincter complex. Detection of anatomical location of fistula tract and abscess is critical to select the best procedure. Objectives This study tries to demonstrate the accuracy of endorectal ultrasonography in mixed group of patients in diagnosing perianal fistula during two years, retrospectively. Patients and Methods After Ethics Committee approval, all endorectal ultrasonography reports of all patients with perianal fistula referred to Shiraz Endorectal Ultrasonography Clinic of Shiraz colorectal research center between 2010 and 2012 were gathered. All endorectal ultrasonographies in this center was perform by a colorectal surgeon with BK Medical Class I type B Ultrasonography scanner with 12 MHz probe. Results Finally, 183 cases of perianal fistula were enrolled in the study. Operation notes were evaluated and the type of fistula was compared with ultrasound findings. This study showed that endorectal ultrasonography has adequate accuracy with 97.92% sensitivity and acceptable 89.53% specificity in diagnosis of perianal fistula. Compared with other reports, it seems that endorectal ultrasonography is an acceptable diagnostic tool for detecting perianal fistula compared with other diagnostic modalities. Conclusions Endoanal sonography would be one of the high sensitive modalities for evaluation of perianal fistula. Detection of anatomy of fistula helps surgeon to choose best method for surgery.

Learning curve of endorectal ultrasonography in preoperative staging of rectal carcinoma.

Accurate preoperative staging of rectal carcinoma is essential for optimal treatment. This study was designed to evaluate the accuracy and learning curve of endorectal ultrasonography (ERUS) in the preoperative staging of rectal carcinoma. We retrospectively analyzed the records of patients with rectal carcinoma who underwent preoperative ERUS followed by curative surgery at the Shanxi Province Tumor Hospital between January, 2007 and March, 2010. The patients were divided into three groups, namely A, B and C, depending on whether the examination was performed between January and December, 2007, between January and December, 2008 or between January, 2009 and March, 2010, respectively. Five physicians with no prior experience in ERUS performed the examinations. We compared the ERUS staging with the pathological findings using the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classification. The accuracy of ERUS in T and N staging after each additional consecutive 20 patients was calculated for physicians D, E and F. A total of 319 patients underwent ERUS prior to surgery. There were 38 patients in group A, 135 in group B and 146 in group C. Two of the five physicians performed only 47 of the 319 examinations, whereas the remaining 272 patients were examined by physicians D (n=162), E (n=64) and F (n=46). The overall accuracy in assessing the extent of rectal wall invasion (T) was 67%, with 16% of the cases overstaged and 17% understaged and the accuracy in assessing nodal involvement (N) was 66%, with 11% of the cases overstaged and 23% understaged. The total T and N staging accuracy of physicians D, E and F was 75 and 72%; 59 and 59%; and 50 and 52%, respectively. For physicians D, E and F, the accuracy of T and N staging after each additional 20 patients was calculated and the curve of the accuracy reached a plateau after physician D completed 80 cases. Therefore, ERUS is a valuable tool for assessing the depth of tumor invasion and it appears that after ~80 cases a physician may be considered able to apply it efficiently.

Clinical value of radial endorectal ultrasound in the assessment of preoperative staging of rectal carcinoma

To evaluate the clinical value of radial endorectal ultrasound (ERUS) in the assessment of preoperative staging of rectal carcinoma. One hundred and ten patients with rectal cancer underwent preoperative endorectal ultrasound (ERUS) examination in our hospital from February 2010 to September 2011. ERUS was performed using a Hitachi 900, Hitachi HI Vision Preirus US scanner, with a 5 - 10 MHz rigid rotating radial transducer and a focal length of 2 - 5 cm. The size, shape, echo pattern, infiltration depth, degree of circumferential involvement, extra-rectal invasion of the lesions and lymph node involvement were observed. The results of ERUS staging were compared with histopathological findings of the surgical specimens. The accuracy of ERUS for T staging was 91.4%. The accuracy of ERUS in diagnosing stage T1, T2, T3, T4 cancers was 92.7%, 88.2%, 88.2% and 96.4%, respectively. The sensitivity of ERUS in diagnosing stage T1, T2, T3, T4 cancers was 92.3%, 72.7%, 85.4% and 71.4%, respectively. The specificity of ERUS in diagnosing stage T1, T2, T3, T4 cancer was 92.9%, 92.0%, 90.3% and 100.0%, respectively. Comparing the consistency of preoperative T-staging and postoperative pathological results, the Kappa value was 0.75, with a considerable consistency. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of ERUS in the assessment of lymph node metastasis were 74.2%, 89.9% and 85.5%, respectively. Comparing the consistency of preoperative N-staging and postoperative pathological results, the Kappa value was 0.64, with a considerable consistency. ERUS is a practical and accurate tool in assessment of preoperative staging of rectal tumors in regard to tumor invasion depth (T) and regional lymph node status (N), with advantages of simple operation, less pain, and high accuracy.

Accuracy of Endorectal Ultrasonography and Computed Tomography for Restaging Rectal Cancer after Preoperative Chemoradiation

Accuracy of Endorectal Ultrasonography and Computed Tomography for Restaging Rectal Cancer after Preoperative Chemoradiation

Endorectal Ultrasound Accuracy in the Diagnosis of Rectal Endometriosis Infiltration Depth

Endorectal Ultrasound Accuracy in the Diagnosis of Rectal Endometriosis Infiltration Depth

Endorectal ultrasound accuracy in the diagnosis of rectal endometriosis infiltration depth

To evaluate the accuracy of endorectal ultrasound examination to ascertain the deepest rectal layer involved in rectal endometriosis. Retrospective study. Department of obstetrics and gynecology at a university hospital in France. Women presenting with rectal endometriosis who had undergone rectal resection during a 22-month period. Endorectal ultrasonography. The predicted rectal infiltration depth by using endorectal examination was compared with histological findings. The level of agreement was evaluated by using the coefficients of concordance kappa and weighted kappa. Sixteen women were included in the study. Rectal resection was segmental in 14 cases and was limited in 2 cases. The agreement between 2 examinations was considered good in 9 cases (56%). Endorectal ultrasound overestimated the depth of infiltration in 5 cases and underestimated it in 2 cases. The coefficients of concordance kappa (95% confidence interval) and weighted kappa (95% confidence interval) were, respectively, 0.17 (0-0.34) and 0.22 (0.04-0.4), corresponding to poor concordance between the endorectal ultrasonography and histological examination. Accuracy in the prediction of rectal-layer involvement in endorectal ultrasonography appears to be limited. This information should not be considered sufficient when selecting the type of rectal-resection procedure.

Preoperative staging of rectal carcinoma by endorectal ultrasound: is there a learning curve?

Endorectal ultrasound (ERUS) is becoming an essential tool in the management of rectal cancer. However, accuracy in the assessment of disease staging may be dependent on operator experience. The aim of this study was to determine if a learning curve exists. From October 1999 to December 2004, all patients with rectal cancer had a pre-operative ERUS performed by a single radiologist. ERUS staging was compared with post-operative pathology findings using the tumour, node, metastases (TNM) classification. The accuracy of ERUS in tumour (T) and node (N) staging after each additional consecutive ten patients was calculated. One hundred and thirty one patients were investigated by ERUS, of which 36 were excluded, leaving 95 patients in the study (60 men). Overall accuracy for T staging was 71.6%. No improvement with experience was noted (p > 0.05). With regard to T staging, ERUS tended to overstage more frequently than understage (24.2 versus 4.2%). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of uT3 staging were 96.6, 33.3, 70.4 and 85.7%, respectively. Overall accuracy of uN staging was 68.8%. ERUS tended to overstage nodal disease more frequently than understage (16.1 versus 15.1%). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were calculated for ultrasound-detected nodal disease (73.2, 62.2, 74.5 and 60.5%, respectively). Nodal staging accuracy improved from 50% after assessment of 10 cases to 77% after 30 cases were examined. ERUS is an accurate method for staging rectal cancer pre-operatively. Accurate assessment of tumour stage can be achieved immediately by an experienced radiologist without specific training in ERUS. Nodal staging accuracy tends to improve with experience but reaches a plateau after 30 cases.

Accuracy of endorectal ultrasonography in the preoperative staging of rectal cancer

Preoperative staging of rectal tumours is considered essential to tailoring treatment for individual patients. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the accuracy of 3-D-endorectal ultrasonography for the preoperative staging of rectal cancer. Three hundred and fifty-seven patients with rectal adenocarcinomas underwent an endorectal ultrasonography evaluation during a period of eight years. The evaluation was performed by four surgeons. We compared the endorectal ultrasonography staging with the pathology findings. Patients with preoperative chemoradiation were excluded from the study. Overall accuracy in assessing the level of rectal wall invasion was 77.3%, with 9.3% of the tumours overstaged and 8.1% understaged. Accuracy in assessing nodal involvement in 313 patients treated with radical surgery was 74.9%, with 8.9% overstaged and 8.9% understaged. The accuracy of 3-D-endorectal ultrasonography in assessing the depth of tumour infiltration is good, but it is lower than previously reported. The technique is precise in distinguishing between benign tumours and invasive cancer. The results depend on the experience of the surgeon.

Accuracy of endorectal ultrasonography in preoperative staging of rectal tumors.

Preoperative staging of rectal tumors is considered essential to tailor treatment for individual patients. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the accuracy of endorectal ultrasonography in preoperative staging of rectal tumors. Eleven hundred eighty-four patients with rectal adenocarcinoma or villous adenoma underwent endorectal ultrasonography evaluation at a single institution during a ten-year period. We compared the endorectal ultrasonography staging with the pathology findings based on the surgical specimens in 545 patients who had surgery (307 by transanal excision, 238 by radical proctectomy) without adjuvant preoperative chemoradiation. Comparisons between groups were performed using chi-squared tests and logistic regression analysis. Overall accuracy in assessing the level of rectal wall invasion was 69 percent, with 18 percent of the tumors overstaged and 13 percent understaged. Accuracy depended on the tumor stage and on the ultrasonographer. Overall accuracy in assessing nodal involvement in the 238 patients treated with radical surgery was 64 percent, with 25 percent overstaged and 11 percent understaged. The accuracy of endorectal ultrasonography in assessing the depth of tumor invasion, particularly for early cancers, is lower than previously reported. The technique is more precise in distinguishing between benign tumors and invasive cancers and between tumors localized to the rectal wall and tumors with transmural invasion. Differences in image interpretation may in part explain discrepancies in accuracy between studies.