Accuracy Of Confocal Microscopy Research Articles

Dermoscopic, Histological, Confocal Microscopy Correlation of Atypical-Dysplastic Melanocytic Nevi.

The term "atypical melanocytic nevus" (AMN) is used as a synonym for dysplastic nevus (DN) in clinical practice. Although the criteria for diagnosis of AMN/DN by the Agency for Research on Cancer helps to differentiate AMN/DN from common acquired nevi, they do not have high degrees of specificity, as they are similar to those used for the diagnosis of melanoma. In this retrospective study we evaluated the correlation and diagnostic concordance of dermoscopy, confocal microscopy, and histological examination in 50 AMN. A graded scale was used to compare histological examination with dermoscopy and confocal microscopy. Low magnification histological images of only the central part of lesions were examined. This allowed histological diagnoses based almost exclusively on architectural criteria instead of simultaneously architectural and cytological, as in the global histological examination. Our data demonstrate that the diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy and confocal microscopy diagnosis of the clinical aspects of AMN/DN as nevi or melanomas tends to be equivalent, being fair for nevi and excellent for melanomas. The total percentage of AMN suggested that the accuracy of confocal microscopy in the diagnosis of melanoma (86.7%) is greater than that of dermoscopy (73.3%). This study demonstrated that diagnostic assessments of AMN/DN by dermoscopy and confocal microscopy are accurate and often coincide with those of histological examination and that their combined use helps to better manage and monitor these patients by facilitating early detection of melanomas and reducing unnecessary excisions of benign melanocytic lesions.

Reflectance confocal microscopy for the diagnosis of skin infections and infestations

Reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) is a noninvasive real-time imaging technique that has been widely used for the diagnosis of skin cancer. More recently, it has been reported as a useful tool for the diagnosis and management of several inflammatory and infectious skin disorders. This article provides an overview of the current available applications of RCM use in cutaneous infections and infestations. PubMed was used to search the following terms in various combinations: reflectance confocal microscopy, skin, hair, nail, infection, parasitosis, mycosis, virus, bacteria. All papers were accordingly reviewed. In most cutaneous infections or infestations, the main alterations are found in the epidermis and upper dermis, where the accuracy of confocal microscopy is nearly similar to that of histopathology. The high resolution of this technique allows the visualization of most skin parasites, fungi, and a few bacteria. Although viruses cannot be identified because of their small size, viral cytopathic effects can be observed on keratinocytes. In addition, RCM can be used to monitor the response to treatment, thereby reducing unnecessary treatments.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Accuracy of Confocal Microscopy in the Diagnosis of Skin Cancer

Background: Nonmelanoma skin cancer (Basal Cell Cancer (BCC) and Squamous Cell Cancer (SCC)) are the most prevalent cancer in the light-skinned population. The incidence of melanoma has been increasing steadily throughout the world. Early recognition of skin cancer without doing biopsy remains challenging. The development of noninvasive diagnostic technologies is highly relevant and desired. Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy (CLSM) enables in vivo and ex vivo imaging of human skin at a quasi-histologic resolution. Methods and Materials: Several databases like Medline, Embase, all EBM reviews (ACP Journal Club, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects) and Journals@Ovid were used to perform a literature search on CLSM in the diagnosis of melanoma and non melanoma skin cancers. Standards for Reporting of Diagnosis Accuracy (STARD) initiative checklist and National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines on methodology were used to assess the quality of the studies found. Eight studies fulfilling relevant criteria inclusive of assessment of diagnostic accuracy of CSLM and histopathology were selected. Heterogeneity among the studies was assessed and the data was pooled for meta- analysis. Results: The eight included studies did not have considerable heterogeneity between them. The pooled sensitivity for melanoma diagnosis was 91.4% and for BCC diagnosis was 90.1%. Pooled specificities were 79.9% and 92.6% for malignant melanoma and BCC respectively. Diagnostic odds ratios for melanoma and BCC were 80.1 and 358.1 respectively. Conclusions: From the limited good quality available literature we found that CLSM has the potential to be an additional noninvasive diagnostic test to dermoscopy for the diagnosis of BCC and melanoma.