Accuracy Of Brain Natriuretic Peptide Research Articles

What is the accuracy of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) or amino-terminal pro-BNP (NT-proBNP) for the diagnosis of hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus (hsPDA) in preterm infants?

What is the accuracy of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) or amino-terminal pro-BNP (NT-proBNP) for the diagnosis of hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus (hsPDA) in preterm infants?

Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies on the use of brain natriuretic peptide and N-terminal brain natriuretic peptide levels in the diagnosis of cardiopulmonary edema in acute respiratory failure

BackgroundDyspnea with bilateral pulmonary edema is common among patients in emergency departments (EDs) or intensive care units (ICUs). For the initial management of patients with this condition, cardiopulmonary edema (CPE) must be differentiated from acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in clinical settings. Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) are useful in distinguishing these conditions. However, current data about the use of these indexes are limited. Hence, we planned to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the accuracy of the two indexes for the diagnosis of CPE.MethodsWe designed and registered a study protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. This study aims to determine the diagnostic accuracy of BNP and NT-proBNP based on the standards of the methodology of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy and the Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies in reporting the findings of this review. We will search PubMed (MEDLINE), Cochrane Library, Embase, www.ClinicalTrials.gov, International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and Google Scholar. Randomized controlled trials, cross-sectional studies, and observational cohort studies reporting the accuracy in diagnosing CPE among adult patients with dyspnea and bilateral pulmonary edema will be included in the analysis. There will be no limits regarding language and publication date for this review. Two reviewers will independently screen articles, extract data, evaluate for quality and bias using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2), and use Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation to summarize the strength of body of evidence. Then, a meta-analysis will be performed, and different statistical methods will be used to investigate heterogeneity among studies. A subgroup analysis of elderly patients with left ventricular dysfunction or chronic renal dysfunction will be performed. In the meta-analysis, a hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic model or a bivariate model will be used in each index test, as appropriate.DiscussionA systematic review and meta-analysis of the accuracy of BNP and NT-proBNP for the diagnosis of CPE will be conducted. The result of this study can help clinicians to identify an appropriate initial treatment for patients with acute respiratory failure, including those with ARDS and CPE. To the best of our knowledge, this will be the first comprehensive systematic review focusing on ARDS management in a specific population.Systematic review registrationPROSPERO ID CRD42020201576

Natriuretic peptides in bronchopulmonary dysplasia: a systematic review.

To systematically review the diagnostic accuracy of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and amino-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) and BPD-pulmonary hypertension (PH). PubMed, Embase, the Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched in March 2019. We included studies that evaluated BNP or NT-proBNP in preterm neonates as a marker for predicting BPD, BPD or death, and BPD-PH. Nine studies evaluating NT-proBNP/BNP were included. The quality of evidence was low, using GRADE criteria. The diagnostic accuracy of NT-proBNP and BNP for diagnosing BPD-PH showed high sensitivity and specificity in infants with BPD. Lower sensitivities and specificities of NT-proBNP and BNP were reported for predicting BPD, BPD or death, compared with that for BPD-PH. Low quality evidence suggests that NT-proBNP and BNP have adequate diagnostic accuracy for diagnosing and monitoring BPD-PH and may be used to triage patients to receive an echocardiogram.

Accuracy of Brain Natriuretic Peptide for Diagnosing Pulmonary Hypertension in Severe Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia

Background: Premature infants with severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia (sBPD) are at risk of pulmonary hypertension (PH). Serum brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) is used to predict disease severity in adult PH. Its diagnostic utility in sBPD-associated PH is unknown. Objective: The aim of this paper was to determine the accuracy of BNP, against echocardiogram (echo), to diagnose PH in infants born <32 weeks’ gestation with sBPD. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all infants with sBPD with an echo and BNP within a 24-h period, at ≥36 weeks postmenstrual age. PH was defined as: right ventricular pressure >½ systemic blood pressure estimated from tricuspid regurgitant jet or patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) velocity, bidirectional or right-to left-PDA, and/or flat/bowing ventricular septum at end-systole. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to test the diagnostic accuracy of BNP. Results:Of 128 infants, 68 (53%) had echo evidence of PH. BNP was higher among the infants with PH (median [interquartile range]: 127 pg/mL [39–290] vs. 35 [20–76], p < 0.001). The area under the ROC curve for diagnosing PH using BNP was 0.74 (95% CI 0.66–0.83). At an optimal cutpoint of 130 pg/mL, BNP correctly classified the presence or absence of PH in 70% of the infants (specificity: 92, sensitivity: 50%). Conclusions: BNP, relative to concurrent echo, demonstrated moderate accuracy for diagnosing PH in this cohort of preterm infants with sBPD. BNP may help rule in PH in this population but has low utility to rule out the disease.

Cardiac Biomarkers Predicting MACE in Patients Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery: A Meta-Analysis.

Objective: The present meta-analysis was aimed to systematically evaluate the effectiveness and accuracy of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), cardiac troponin (cTn), high sensitive C reactive protein (hs-CRP) and CRP for predicting postoperative major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery.Methods: A total of 26 relevant studies with 7,877 participants were collected from five databases, namely PubMed, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), CQVIP and the Wanfang Database until August 10, 2018. And the Review Manager Version 5.3 and Stata/SE 12 software were used for data syntheses in the meta-analysis.Results: Strong relationships of BNP/NT-proBNP, cTnI/cTnT and hs-CRP with MACE were detected in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery, and the five biomarkers all increased the risk of MACE. Compared to normal levels, elevated BNP/NT-proBNP could increase the MACE risk by almost 4-fold [RR:3.92, 95%CI: 3.23–4.75, P < 0.001]; elevated BNP corresponded to a 4.5-fold risk [RR:4.57, 95%CI: 3.37–6.20, P < 0.001]; elevated NT-proBNP led to a 3-fold higher risk [RR:3.48, 95%CI: 2.71–4.46, P < 0.001]. Comparing with normal levels of cTnI/cTnT, increased cTnI/cTnT was associated with nearly 5-fold more higher risk of MACE [RR:5.52, 95%CI: 4.62–6.58, P < 0.001]; elevated cTnI faced a 5-fold risk [RR:5.21, 95%CI: 3.96–6.86, P < 0.001]; elevated cTnT resulted in nearly 6-fold higher risk [RR:5.73, 95%CI: 4.55–7.22, P < 0.001]. The elevation of hs-CRP was associated with nearly 4-fold higher risk of MACE in comparison with normal concentration [RR:3.73, 95%CI: 2.63–5.30, P < 0.001].Conclusion: According to the results of our meta-analysis, the elevations of BNP/NT-proBNP, cTnI/cTnT, and hs-CRP, pre-operation or post-operation immediately, can predict much higher risk of postoperative MACE in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery.

GW29-e1315 Cardiac biomarkers predicting MACE in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery:a meta-analysis

The present meta-analysis was aimed to systematically evaluate the effectiveness and accuracy of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), cardiac troponin (cTn) and high sensitive C reactive protein (hs-CRP) for predicting postoperative major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients undergoing

The End of X‐rays for Suspected Small Bowel Obstruction? Using Evidence‐based Diagnostics to Inform Best Practices in Emergency Medicine

The End of X‐rays for Suspected Small Bowel Obstruction? Using Evidence‐based Diagnostics to Inform Best Practices in Emergency Medicine

Value of brain natriuretic peptides in primary care patients with the clinical diagnosis of chronic heart failure

Introduction. Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-Terminal pro natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) are widely accepted to diagnose congestive heart failure (CHF) in the emergency room. The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of BNP and NT-proBNP to diagnose CHF in primary care. Methods. Clinical and Doppler-echocardiographic assessment of patients referred by their general practitioner (GP) with the diagnosis of CHF. Receiver operating curves were used to evaluate the accuracy of BNP and NT-proBNP for echocardiographically confirmed systolic and/or diastolic heart failure. Results. Three hundred and eighty four patients (mean age of 65) were included. One hundred and ninety three (50%) patients had systolic heart failure and 31 (8%) had isolated diastolic heart failure. Using currently recommended cut-off values of BNP (less than 100 pg/ml) and NT-proBNP (less than 125 pg/ml) for exclusion of CHF, BNP was false negative in 25% and NT-proBNP in 10% of the patients. The area under the curve was better for NT-proBNP than for BNP (0.742 vs. 0.691). Conclusion. In this population with a high prevalence of CHF, BNP and NT-proBNP failed to adequately rule out CHF. GP's should be cautious when using BNP and NT-proBNP in primary care. An echocardiography remains compulsory in unexplained dyspnea.

The accuracy of natriuretic peptides (brain natriuretic peptide and N‐terminal pro‐brain natriuretic) in the differentiation between transfusion‐related acute lung injury and transfusion‐related circulatory overload in the critically ill

The diagnostic workup of transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI) requires an exclusion of transfusion-associated circulatory overload (TACO). Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic (NT-pro-BNP) accurately diagnosed TACO in preliminary studies that did not include patients with TRALI. In this prospective cohort study, two critical care experts blinded to serum levels of BNP and NT-pro-BNP determined the diagnosis of TRALI, TACO, and possible TRALI based on the consensus conference definitions. The accuracy of BNP and NT-pro-BNP was assessed based on the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC). Of 115 patients who developed acute pulmonary edema after transfusion, 34 were identified with TRALI, 31 with possible TRALI, and 50 with TACO. Median BNP was 375 pg per mL (interquartile range [IQR], 123 to 781 pg/mL) in TRALI, 446 pg per mL (IQR, 128 to 743 pg/mL) in possible TRALI, and 559 pg per mL (IQR, 288 to 1348 pg/mL) in TACO patients (p = 0.038). The NT-pro-BNP levels among patients with TRALI, possible TRALI, and TACO differed significantly with a median value of 1559 pg per mL (IQR, 629 to 5114 pg/mL), 2349 pg/mL (IQR, 919 to 4610 pg/mL), and 5197 pg/mL (IQR, 1695 to 15,714 pg/mL; p = 0.004), respectively. The accuracy of BNP and NT-pro-BNP to diagnose TACO was moderate with an AUC of 0.63 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51-0.74) and 0.70 (95% CI, 0.59 to 0.80). Natriuretic peptides are of limited diagnostic value in a differential diagnosis of pulmonary edema after transfusion in the critically ill patients.

Natriuretic peptides in acute pulmonary embolism: a systematic review

Patients with pulmonary embolism (PE) have a high risk of death, and it is important to recognize factors associated with higher mortality. Recently, several biomarkers have been studied for risk stratification in patients with PE. Evaluate the available evidence on (a) the accuracy of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) for the diagnosis of right ventricular dysfunction and (b) their value as a prognostic factor of all-cause in-hospital or short-term mortality in patients with PE. MEDLINE, Embase, and citation review of relevant primary and review articles. We selected studies evaluating the accuracy of BNP or NT-proBNP for the diagnosis of right ventricular dysfunction. We also selected studies that reported data on BNP or NT-proBNP as a predictor of short-term mortality in patients with PE. Sixteen studies met our inclusion criteria. The pooled diagnostic odds ratio for the diagnosis of right ventricular dysfunction in pulmonary embolism was 39.45 (95% CI; 15.54-100.12) and 24.73 (95% CI 2.02-302.37) for BNP and NT-proBNP, respectively. The pooled odds ratio for all-cause in-hospital or short-term mortality was 6 (95% CI 1.31-27.43; p: 0.021) and 16.12 (95% CI 3.1-83.68; p: 0.001) for BNP (cutoff: 100 pg/ml) and NT-proBNP (cutoff: 600 ng/L), respectively. The results of this meta-analysis indicate that BNP and NT-proBNP are associated with the diagnosis of right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) in patients with an acute PE and are significant predictors of all-cause in-hospital or short-term mortality in these patients.

Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracy of BNP and NT-proBNP in Acute and Chronic Heart Failure

I read with great interest the paper by Clerico et al. (1), which described a comparable diagnostic accuracy of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and the N-terminal part of the propeptide of BNP (NT-proBNP) in patients with heart failure. The authors are to be congratulated for addressing this important issue. …

Comparison of Brain Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) and Amino-Terminal ProBNP for Early Diagnosis of Heart Failure

We compared the diagnostic accuracy of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and amino-terminal proBNP (NT-proBNP) for diagnosis of preclinical and mild heart failure (HF). We assayed plasma NT-proBNP and BNP in 182 healthy controls and in a prospective cohort of 820 HF patients divided according to the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology classification. These included 86 patients in stage A [mean (SE) ejection fraction 61% (1%); mean (SE) age 47 (2) years], 255 in stage B [65% (2%); 62 (1) years], 420 patients in stage C [35% (1%); 68 (1) years] and 59 in stage D [25% (1%); 74 (1) years]. Diagnostic accuracies of BNP and NT-proBNP were evaluated by ROC analysis, and a multivariate linear regression model was applied to predict HF staging. Median BNP and NT-proBNP concentrations increased from stage A to D 57-fold and 107-fold, respectively. Both assays were accurate (P <0.001) in separating stage B from controls or stage A, and stage C from controls or stage A or B. NT-proBNP was more accurate (P <0.001) than BNP in differentiating stage C from stages A and B patients and controls and was a better predictor of HF classification in a model including age, sex, and renal function (P <0.001). Monitoring BNP or NT-proBNP enabled identification of asymptomatic patients at risk for the development of HF. NT-proBNP showed better accuracy than BNP for identifying mild HF.

Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Brain Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) and the N-Terminal Part of the Propeptide of BNP Immunoassays in Chronic and Acute Heart Failure: A Systematic Review

We used evidence-based laboratory medicine principles to compare the diagnostic accuracy of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and the N-terminal part of the propeptide of BNP (NT-proBNP) assays for the diagnosis of heart failure. In May 2006, we performed a computerized literature search of the online National Library of Medicine to select studies specifically designed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of BNP and NT-proBNP assays. The comparison took into account the area under the curve and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) derived from ROC analysis of original studies. Both BNP and NT-proBNP assays were found to be clinically useful for the diagnosis of heart failure. Metaanalysis of these data was difficult because of the heterogeneity of data regarding patient population, diagnostic criteria, end-points, and immunoassay methods for both BNP and NT-proBNP. Separate metaanalyses were performed for acute and chronic heart failure. In chronic heart failure, the diagnostic DOR for BNP (8.44, 95% CI 4.66-15.30) was not significantly different from that of NT-proBNP (23.36, 95% CI 9.38-58.19). In patients with acute heart failure, the mean DOR for BNP (16.46, 95% CI 10.65-25.43) was not significantly different from that of NT-proBNP (18.61, 95% CI 12.99-26.65). Our results indicate that both BNP and NT-proBNP assays have a high degree of diagnostic accuracy and clinical relevance for both acute and chronic heart failure.

Brain Natriuretic Peptide in Patients With Congestive Heart Failure and Central Sleep Apnea

To assess the possible relationship between Cheyne-Stokes respiration (CSR) associated with central sleep apnea (CSA) syndrome and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) in an outpatient population presenting with stable congestive heart failure (CHF). Ninety patients with CHF due to systolic dysfunction (left ventricular ejection fraction <or= 45%) were prospectively studied. Each patient underwent conventional polysomnography to establish the diagnosis of CSR-CSA and determination of the BNP level. The correlation between BNP levels and the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and desaturation index (DI) was evaluated, as was the accuracy of BNP in identifying CHF-associated CSR-CSA, as determined by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Possible confounding variables were assessed, and a stepwise multiple regression analysis was applied to identify those factors that best predicted the variability in BNP levels. Five of the 90 patients were excluded from the study as they presented with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Of the remaining 85 patients, 25 (28%) presented with associated CSR-CSA. The mean (+/-SEM) BNP level was higher in this group (166.44 +/- 29.6 pg/mL) than in the group with isolated CHF (62.01 +/- 13.6 pg/mL; p < 0.001). There was a moderate correlation between BNP levels and AHI. The ROC curve that best identified CSR-CSA was obtained with a BNP cutoff value of 116.25 pg/mL (sensitivity, 62%; specificity, 92%; accuracy, 83%). Differences between the two groups in terms of BNP levels persisted after adjusting for the confounding variables that were analyzed. Only AHI and DI were independently related to the BNP level, and both explain the 30.5% variability. Patients with CHF and CSR-CSA have higher BNP levels than those without CSR-CSA. Our results suggest that CSR-CSA and BNP levels are related. However, the possibility that both factors might be independent expressions of the functional status of CHF patients cannot be ruled out.

Role of B Type Natriuretic Peptide in the Early Diagnosis of Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction in High Risk Subjects

Background: Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) reflects left ventricular pressure. It increases in systolic dysfunction. Our aim was to evaluate role of plasma BNP level in early diagnosis of left ventricular isolated diastolic dysfunction. Methods: We studied 60 patients (male=18, female=42) with hypertension, diabetes mellitus, ischemic heart disease, dyslipidemia. The Doppler parameters used for evaluation of diastolic dysfunction are: isovolumetric relaxation time (IVRT), Transmitral flow velocities (E/A) ratio, deceleration time (DT) &amp; pulmonary vein Doppler findings. 49 patients (group-1) had diastolic dysfunction whereas 11 patients (group-2) had normal flow patterns. Plasma BNP level was done in all patients. Results: Mean plasma BNP levels were 40.41±6.82 pg/ml in individuals with normal filling patterns and 183.36±25.28 pg/ml in subjects with abnormal diastolic dysfunction (p&lt;0.001).The accuracy of BNP in detecting diastolic dysfunction was assessed with receiver-operating characteristic(ROC) analysis. The area under the ROC curve for BNP test accuracy in detection of any abnormal diastolic dysfunction was 0.928 (95% CI, 0.861 to 0.994;p&lt;0.001).A BNP value of 63 pg/ml had the sensitivity of 89.9%,specificity of 91.9% and accuracy of 90.3%.PPVwas 97.8% and NPV-66.7% for detecting diastolic dysfunction. Conclusion: Raised plasma BNP level is useful for early diagnosis of isolated left ventricular Diastolic dysfunction. Key words: BNP; Diastolic dysfunction. DOI: 10.3329/cardio.v3i1.6419Cardiovasc. j. 2010; 3(1): 2-6