Patient Accrual Research Articles

DISP-05. SUPERVISED MACHINE LEARNING PREDICTION OF THERAPEUTIC CLINICAL TRIAL ENROLLMENT FOR MINORITY PATIENTS AND WOMEN IN NEURO-ONCOLOGY

Abstract BACKGROUND Despite changes in national policy, women and minority patients remain under-accrued in glioma clinical trials. Supervised machine learning may serve as a novel approach to understanding which variables and their complex interplay most influence enrollment for underrepresented patients. We aimed to design and externally validate machine learning models to predict therapeutic clinical trial enrollment for a) all patients, b) women, and c) NIH-designated minority patients with low- and high-grade glioma. METHODS In a 20-year retrospective cohort of 1042 adult patients with low- and high-grade glioma, boosted neural network (BNN) models for the whole, women, and minority cohorts were used to analyze the combined effects of demographic, socioeconomic, and oncologic variables on clinical trial enrollment. These models were validated using an external cohort (n=103). RESULTS In the development cohort (445 [42.7%] women; 151 [14.5%] minorities; median age, 51.5 [interquartile range: 39.4-62.5] years), 350 patients (33.6%) enrolled in a therapeutic clinical trial. The whole cohort BNN (AUC: 0.827, misclassification rate (MR): 0.175), the women cohort BNN (AUC: 0.895, MR: 0.125), and the minority cohort BNN (AUC: 0.983, MR: 0.053) models accurately predicted trial enrollment on external validation. For the whole cohort and women models, several demographic (race, ethnicity, minority status, sex), socioeconomic (insurance, employment status), and oncologic variables (seizure, chemotherapy, KPS, WHO grade, tumor lobe) were equally influential (Main effect (ME): 1.000, Total effect (TE): 1.000) on enrollment. For the minority model, socioeconomic variables including insurance status (ME: 0.089, TE: 0.417) and occupation classification (ME: 0.087, TE: 0.381) drove enrollment. CONCLUSION We designed and externally validated the first machine learning model for predicting therapeutic clinical trial enrollment for patients with diffuse glioma. Model features driving trial enrollment varied for underrepresented patients. These results may help prioritize personalized patient-specific initiatives to address barriers to equitable patient accrual.

The Comparison of Intravesical Therapy and Surgery as Treatment Options for Bladder Cancer (CISTO) study: Lessons learned about management and patient enrollment in a large, pragmatic, patient-centered trial.

The growth of patient and public involvement in clinical research highlights the paucity of literature on operational practices that ensure the success of large, patient-centered outcomes trials. The authors' objective was to identify tools launched by the Comparison of Intravesical Therapy and Surgery as Treatment Options for Bladder Cancer (CISTO) study team to determine their effectiveness in maximizing patient enrollment in this observational, pragmatic trial. The primary outcomes for this study were patient screening and enrollment across 36 CISTO study sites. The operational strategies included CISTOquestion email correspondence and All Sites Meetings, specifically poll performance data from meetings, and a nonanonymized feedback survey about the CISTO study's management practices. Effectiveness was measured using correlation analysis with patient cohort data, including screenings, enrollments, post-hoc exclusions, and the post-hoc exclusion rate. Average screenings and enrollment rose after the implementation of CISTOquestion in April 2021, with the average number of screenings rising from 7.42 to 26.8 patients per month and enrollment rising from 3.76 to 16 patients per month. Use of CISTOquestion was correlated strongly with increased patient screenings and enrollment across all study sites. Eighty-three percent of sites with above-average post-hoc exclusion rates (≥0.092) sent below the average number of CISTOquestion inquiries. Poll performance and survey data revealed that all survey respondents who used CISTOquestion found that it was a valuable and accessible resource. Of the several operational tools implemented within the CISTO study that aimed to improve patient enrollment, CISTOquestion, a centralized email for addressing eligibility questions, was most beneficial to overall patient accrual.

Consideration of factors of low accrual and methods for setting appropriate accrual periods: Japan Clinical Oncology Group study

BackgroundPoor patient accrual can delay reporting of clinical trials and, consequently, the development of new treatments. For reducing the risk of additional resource requirements, a method for setting planned accrual periods with minimal deviation from the actual accrual periods is desirable. Risk factors for poor patient accrual and the appropriate method of estimating the required accrual period for timely completion of clinical trials were evaluated using the data of trials conducted by the Japan Clinical Oncology Group.MethodsThe study included 199 trials that started patient accrual between January 1, 1990, and June 30, 2021. The explanatory variables included factors that could be evaluated prior to trial commencement. We also evaluated whether the estimation methods for accrual pace could lead to completion within the planned accrual period.ResultsApproximately 23.6% of trials were completed within the planned accrual period. The risk factors for trial extension included planned accrual periods > 3 years (reference group: ≤ 3 years, odds ratio [OR] 0.37, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.15–0.92, P = 0.033) and stratified trial design (reference group: nonrandomized phase II trials, nonrandomized phase III trial [OR: 3.28, 95% CI: 0.99–10.9, P = 0.051], randomized phase II trial [OR: 3.91, 95% CI: 0.75–20.30, P = 0.105], and randomized phase III trial [OR: 9.29, 95% CI: 3.39–25.40, P < 0.001]). The method of estimating the accrual pace based on past clinical trials facilitated timely completion of the trial (OR: 3.51; 95% CI: 1.73–7.10, P < 0.001), unlike the estimation method based on survey evaluation of the accrual pace for participating institutions (OR: 1.12, 95% CI: 0.56–2.26, P = 0.751). Furthermore, the discrepancy between planned and actual accrual periods was minimal when using the methods of considering the accrual pace of past clinical trials.ConclusionsConsidering the accrual pace of past clinical trials is useful for estimating the required accrual period if data from past trials are available. When conducting a survey, it is necessary to be cautious of overestimating the cases at each facility.

Monitoring Pregnancies Exposed to Galcanezumab for Migraine in a United States Administrative Claims Database.

Galcanezumab is a calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibody indicated for migraine prevention in adults. Due to the long half-life of galcanezumab and the prevalence of migraine in women of childbearing age, galcanezumab exposure may occur during pregnancy. However, real-world use and safety of galcanezumab during pregnancy has not been fully described. To help fill this gap, galcanezumab has two ongoing pregnancy safety studies, one of which is an insurance claims database study. This database study is actively identifying and following pregnancies exposed to galcanezumab using commercial claims from the Healthcare Integrated Research Database (HIRD). Patient accrual is planned from September 2018 to June 2026, with a final study report planned for December 2027. This study requires 430 galcanezumab-exposed pregnancies with linked infants to reach power for comparative analysis of major congenital malformations. Recent monitoring of patient accrual, including data from 28 September 2018 to 31 January 2023, identified 207 galcanezumab-exposed pregnancies in women with migraine in the HIRD, of which 110 were live births and 73 of which were linked to an infant. This represents an annual accrual rate of approximately 17 pregnancies linked to infants, which is substantially lower than the 55 required annually to reach target size within current regulatory-committed study timelines. The accrual of a sufficient number of galcanezumab-exposed pregnancies represents a substantial, but not uncommon, barrier to conducting comparative analyses in pregnancy studies. Potential solutions that would allow for timely dissemination of important safety information to patients and providers may be available.

Association Between State Medicaid Policies and Accrual of Black or Hispanic Patients to Cancer Clinical Trials.

It is unknown whether Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) or state-level policies mandating Medicaid coverage of the routine costs of clinical trial participation have ameliorated longstanding racial and ethnic disparities in cancer clinical trial enrollment. We conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional difference-in-differences analysis examining the effect of Medicaid expansion on rates of enrollment for Black or Hispanic nonelderly adults in nonobservational, US cancer clinical trials using data from Medidata's Rave platform for 2012-2019. We examined heterogeneity in this effect on the basis of whether states had pre-existing mandates requiring Medicaid coverage of the routine costs of clinical trial participation. The study included 47,870 participants across 1,353 clinical trials and 344 clinical trial sites. In expansion states, the proportion of participants who were Black or Hispanic increased from 16.7% before expansion to 17.2% after Medicaid expansion (0.5 percentage point [PP] change [95% CI, -1.1 to 2.0]). In nonexpansion states, this proportion increased from 19.8% before 2014 (when the first states expanded eligibility under the ACA) to 20.4% after 2014 (0.6 PP change [95% CI, -2.3 to 3.5]). These trends yielded a nonsignificant difference-in-differences estimate of 0.9 PP (95% CI, -2.6 to 4.4). Medicaid expansion was associated with a 5.3 PP (95% CI, 1.9 to 8.7) increase in the enrollment of Black or Hispanic participants in states with mandates requiring Medicaid coverage of the routine costs of trial participation, but not in states without mandates (-0.3 PP [95% CI, -4.5 to 3.9]). Medicaid expansion was not associated with a significant increase in the proportion of Black or Hispanic oncology trial participants overall, but was associated with an increase specifically in states that mandated Medicaid coverage of the routine costs of trial participation.

Abstract A004: A Phase 1B/2 trial of second line immunotherapy with pepinemab and avelumab for patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Abstract Background: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality with poor prognosis despite maximal therapy and is recalcitrant to approved immunotherapies. In PDAC, Semaphorin 4D (SEMA4D) expression is prognostic in patients who have undergone surgical resection and correlates with tumor infiltration of activated CD8+ T-cells. Furthermore, preclinical studies suggest that monoclonal blockade of SEMA4D supports CD8+T cells tumoral infiltration and activation, sensitizing PDAC to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). Thus, we hypothesized that a humanized anti-SEMA4D antibody (pepinemab) may improve disease control and responsiveness to ICB in patients with PDAC. Methods: We designed a phase Ib/II single-arm clinical trial to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of pepinemab with anti-PD-L1 (avelumab) in patients with chemotherapy-refractory PDAC (NCT05102721). The study follows a dose de-escalation schema starting at a dose combination of 20mg/kg pepinemab and 800mg avelumab every two weeks. Patient accrual for phase 1b utilizes the Bayesian Optimal Interval design targeting a dose-limiting toxicity rate of 30% or less. After 16 subjects receive a given combination dose, a Simon’s two stage assessment of futility will be undertaken with expansion to phase 2 if 2 or more subjects demonstrate response. Treatment response is assessed via RECIST 1.1 criteria with surveillance CT prior to enrollment and after completion of two cycles (8 weeks). Baseline and on-treatment tumor biopsies (after completion of one cycle, 4 weeks) are performed to analyze changes in immune, stromal, and genomic profiles to elucidate mechanisms of treatment response and failure. Patient reported outcomes are incorporated (FACT-Hep and FAACT subdomains) to assess disease-specific symptoms. Results: A total of 14 patients have been enrolled to date. Three subjects withdrew from the study prior to completing the evaluable period (four weeks of treatment) and nine subjects terminated treatment due to disease progression. Two subjects continue to receive combination treatment pending evaluation of tumor response. Baseline and on-treatment biopsies have been obtained and stored for correlative analysis from 8 evaluable subjects. One treatment-related adverse event occurred though the patient was able to complete treatment without further events. No treatment-related toxicities have been encountered. Conclusions: Combining pepinemab with avelumab appears to be safe and tolerable to date. Nine of eleven patients demonstrated disease progression, though 1 of these 9 demonstrated mixed response with some lesions showing radiologic partial and even complete response. Overall treatment response, survival data, and correlative science forthcoming. Citation Format: Luis I Ruffolo, Matthew Byrne, Bailey Hilty, Brian A Belt, Yatee Dave, Paul Burchard, Terrence Fisher, Elizabeth E. Evans, Crystal Mallow, Megan Boise, Darren Carpizo, Jen Jen Yeh, David C Linehan, Daniel Mulkerin. A Phase 1B/2 trial of second line immunotherapy with pepinemab and avelumab for patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Advances in Pancreatic Cancer Research; 2024 Sep 15-18; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(17 Suppl_2):Abstract nr A004.

Improving clinical trial enrollment in minority racial and ethnic patients with gynecologic malignancy

PurposeRacial and ethnic minorities remain underrepresented in clinical trials . Underrepresentation of racial groups leads to the selection of therapeutic interventions that may not be representative of the population expected to use the medicine. This study evaluates the effectiveness of a set of implementation strategies to increase underrepresented patients in gynecologic cancer clinical trials. MethodsAn interrupted time series analysis evaluating implementation strategies (pre-screening and fast-track referral) was conducted from January 2021 to May 2022. Descriptive analysis of gynecologic oncology patient screening and accrual was compared before and after intervention implementation. ResultsDuring the study period (pre- and post-intervention), 26 patients were screened, and 9 patients enrolled in therapeutic gynecologic cancer clinical trials. Prior to the intervention, 7 patients were screened and 2 patients enrolled onto a clinical trial. Following the intervention, 19 patients were screened and 7 patients enrolled in a cancer clinical trial. Black patients comprised 13 of 19 (68.4%) of patients post-intervention compared to 1 of 7 (14.3 %) of patients screened pre-intervention (p < 0.05). All 7 patients enrolled post intervention were racial and ethnic minorities (non-Hispanic Black [4 of 7] and Hispanic White [3 of 7]) compared to no minority patients enrolled pre-intervention (p < 0.05). Screening increased 2.5-fold for all patients, and 5- fold for minority patients. Clinical trial enrollment increased 3.5-fold following intervention. ConclusionsA combination of pre-screening and fast-track referral intervention in a racial and ethnically diverse urban academic hospital was associated with a significant increase in minority screening and enrollment. Structured strategies to overcome barriers to underrepresented racial and ethnic patient accrual in academic hospitals are urgently warranted.

Comparison of platinum combination chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab versus platinum combination chemotherapy plus nivolumab–ipilimumab for treatment-naive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in Japan (JCOG2007): an open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial

The combination of platinum-based chemotherapy and an antibody to PD-1 or to its ligand PD-L1, with or without an antibody to CTLA-4, has improved the survival of individuals with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, no randomised controlled trial has evaluated the survival benefit of adding a CTLA-4 inhibitor to platinum-based chemotherapy plus a PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitor. This open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial was conducted at 48 hospitals in Japan. Eligible patients were aged 20 years or older with previously untreated advanced NSCLC and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Patients with known driver oncogenes were excluded. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive platinum-based chemotherapy (four cycles) plus pembrolizumab (pembrolizumab group) or platinum-based chemotherapy (two cycles) plus nivolumab-ipilimumab (nivolumab-ipilimumab group). The primary endpoint was overall survival and assessed in all randomly assigned patients on an intention-to-treat basis. The trial is registered in the Japan Registry for Clinical Trials, jRCTs031210013, and is now closed to new enrolment and is ongoing. Between patient accrual initiation on April 6, 2021, and discontinuation of the trial on March 30, 2023, 11 (7%) of 148 patients in the nivolumab-ipilimumab group had a treatment-related death. Because of the high number of treatment-related deaths, patient accrual was terminated early, resulting in 295 patients (236 [80%] male and 59 [20%] female) enrolled; the primary analysis was done on the basis of 117 deaths (fewer than the required 329 deaths). By May 25, 2023 (data cutoff), overall survival did not differ significantly between the nivolumab-ipilimumab group and the pembrolizumab group (median 23·7 months [95% CI 17·6-not estimable] vs 20·5 months [17·6-not estimable], respectively; hazard ratio 0·98 [90% CI 0·72-1·34]; p=0·46). Non-haematological adverse events of grade 3 or worse occurred in 87 (60%) of 146 patients in the nivolumab-ipilimumab group and 59 (41%) of 144 patients in the pembrolizumab group. The pembrolizumab group tended to have a better quality of life compared with the nivolumab-ipilimumab group. The safety and efficacy data suggest an unfavourable benefit-risk profile for nivolumab-ipilimumab combined with platinum-based chemotherapy relative to pembrolizumab combined with platinum-based chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for patients with advanced NSCLC, although a definitive conclusion awaits an updated analysis of overall survival. The National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund and Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development.

Patient Enrollment per Month (Accrual) in Clinical Trials Leading to the FDA Approval of New Cancer Drugs.

Insufficient patient enrollment per month (=accrual) is the leading cause of cancer trial termination. To identify and quantify factors associated with patient accrual in trials leading to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of new cancer drugs. All anti-cancer drugs with FDA approval were identified in the Drugs@FDA database (2000-2022). Data on drug indication's background-, treatment-, disease-, and trial-related factors were collected from FDA labels, clinicaltrials.gov, and the Global Burden of Disease study. The association between patient accrual and collected variables was assessed in Poisson regression models reporting adjusted rate ratios (aRR). We identified 170 drugs with approval in 455 cancer indications on the basis of 292 randomized and 163 single-arm trials. Among randomized trials, median enrollment per month was 38 patients (interquartile range [IQR]: 26-54) for non-orphan, 21 (IQR: 15-38, aRR 0.88, p = 0.361) for common orphan, 20 (IQR: 10-35, aRR 0.73, p <0.001) for rare orphan, and 8 (IQR 6-12, aRR 0.30, p < 0.001) for ultra-rare orphan indications. Patient enrollment was positively associated with disease burden [aRR: 1.0003 per disability-adjusted life year (DALY), p < 0.001), trial sites (aRR: 1.001 per site, p < 0.001), participating countries (aRR: 1.02 per country, p < 0.001), and phase 3 vs. 1/2 trials (aRR: 1.64, p = 0.037). Enrollment was negatively associated with advanced-line vs. first-line treatments (aRR: 0.81, p = 0.010) and monotherapy vs. combination treatments (aRR: 0.80, p = 0.007). Patient enrollment per month was similar between indications with and without a biomarker (median: 27 vs. 32, aRR 0.80, p = 0.117). Patient enrollment per month was substantially lower in government-sponsored than industry-sponsored trials (median: 14 vs. 32, aRR 0.80, p = 0.209). Enrollment was not associated with randomization ratios, crossover, and study blinding. Disease incidence and disease burden alongside the number of study sites and participating countries are the main drivers of patient enrollment in clinical trials. For rare disease trials, greater financial incentives could help expedite patient enrollment. Novel trial design features, including skewed randomization, crossover, or open-label masking, did not entice patient enrollment.

Patient autonomy and shared decision-making in the context of clinical trial participation.

This study aimed to explore how incorporating shared decision-making (SDM) can address recruitment challenges in clinical trials. Specifically, it examines how SDM can align the trial process with patient preferences, enhance patient autonomy and increase active patient participation. Additionally, it identifies potential conflicts between SDM and certain clinical trial aspects, such as randomization or blinding, and proposes solutions to mitigate these issues. We conducted a comprehensive review of existing literature on patient recruitment challenges in clinical trials and the role of SDM in addressing these challenges. We analysed case studies and trial reports to identify common obstacles and assess the effectiveness of SDM in improving patient accrual. Additionally, we evaluated three proposed solutions: adequate trial design, communication skill training and patient decision aids. Our review indicates that incorporating SDM can significantly enhance patient recruitment by promoting patient autonomy and engagement. SDM encourages physicians to adopt a more open and informative approach, which aligns the trial process with patient preferences and reduces psychological barriers such as fear and mental stress. However, implementing SDM can conflict with elements such as randomization and blinding, potentially complicating trial design and execution. The desire for patient autonomy and active engagement through SDM may clash with traditional clinical trial methodologies. To address these conflicts, we propose three solutions: redesigning trials to better accommodate SDM principles, providing communication skill training for physicians and developing patient decision aids. By focussing on patient wishes and emotions, these solutions can integrate SDM into clinical trials effectively. Shared decision-making provides a framework that can promote patient recruitment and trial participation by enhancing patient autonomy and engagement. With proper implementation of trial design modifications, communication skill training and patient decision aids, SDM can support rather than hinder clinical trial execution, ultimately contributing to the advancement of evidence-based medicine.

Phase I/II study of pegylated arginine deiminase (ADI-PEG 20) in combination with gemcitabine and docetaxel in non-small cell and small cell lung cancers.

TPS3189 Background: Arginine is essential to neoplastic growth and development, yet many cancer cells do not express argininosuccinate synthetase (ASS1), an enzyme necessary to produce arginine. ADI-PEG 20 is a microbial enzyme that degrades arginine causing arginine auxotrophy in cancer cells that are ASS1 negative. Preclinical data suggests that ADI-PEG 20 in combination with docetaxel (D), resulted in increased expression of hENT, the transporter for gemcitabine (G) as well upregulation of dCK to trap G inside of cancer cells. A phase II trial of ADI-PEG 20, G and D was shown to be a safe and efficacious combination in soft tissue sarcoma (STS). We are conducting a phase I/II trial examining the safety, tolerability, to determine the recommended phase II dose (R2PD) and evaluate the efficacy of this combination in patients with previously treated metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) with an alternative dosing regimen than that used in STS based on the mechanism of action. Methods: Eligible pts include previously treated metastatic NSCLC and SCLC with performance status 0-1 with adequate organ function. Pts are excluded if previously treated with G; however, prior use of docetaxel is permitted. Up to 12 patients will be enrolled in an open-label phase I trial with a 3 + 3 dose escalation design with ADI-PEG 20 in combination with G and D. Primary objectives of the phase I portion are to determine the safety, tolerability and recommend phase II dose (RP2D) of combination ADI-PEG 20, G and D. Pts will be treated with ADI-PEG 20 intramuscularly at 36mg/m2 on day -7 of cycle 1 and then on days 1, 8, and 15 of each subsequent cycle with dose-escalated G (600, 750, 900 mg/m2) on day 2 and D (60, 75, 75 mg/m2) on day 1 of each 21-day cycle for up to 8 cycles then will continue with combination therapy at provider discretion for up to 34 cycles. The phase II will consist of two cohorts (NSCLC and SCLC) receiving the triplet treatments at the RP2D determined during phase I. Primary objective of the phase II portion is to determine the objective response rate (ORR) in each cohort. Phase II uses a Simon optimal two-stage design per cohort for ORR with a minimum of 12 patients and a maximum of 36 patients per cohort. In the phase I, patient accrual at the maximum tolerated dose level is nearing completion and ADI-PEG in combination with G and D will be further evaluated in the phase II with separate cohorts for NSCLC and SCLC. Clinical trial information: NCT05616624 .

Improving diversity in phase I oncology clinical trials: A single institution experience at the University of Colorado Cancer Center.

e13687 Background: Despite continued improvements in cancer outcomes, disparities persist between racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic groups. One potential driver is the lack of appropriate representation in clinical trials, including dose-finding studies. We implemented a set of initiatives including patient education, outreach, a Spanish-speaking bicultural clinic, and regular review of enrollment by race and ethnicity. To investigate the impact of these initiatives, we examined phase I clinical trial patient demographics and treatment outcomes before and after the intervention. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of patients enrolled in 2018-2019 (cohort 1[C1], pre- intervention) and 2022-2023 (cohort 2[C2], post-intervention). We collected patient demographics, area deprivation index (ADI), body mass index (BMI), ECOG performance status, and tumor type. Differences between cohorts were evaluated with T-tests, Chi-Square test, or the Fisher Exact test. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Hazard ratios (HR), confidence intervals (CI) and p values were derived using the cox proportional hazards method. A multivariable model for patients with colorectal cancers (CRC) was selected using the Akaike information criterion (AIC). Results: A total of 361 patients (C1 n = 209, C2 n = 152) were included. Overall, 52.4% of patients were female. The most common tumor sites were CRC (18.3%), pancreas (11.9%) and breast (10.8%). Study participants were 85.0% White, 3.3% Asian, 1.4% Black and 9.1% Hispanic, compared to cancer incidence in Colorado of 92.8%, 1.6% and 3.3% and 10.0%, respectively. Following our intervention, there was an increase in language preference other than English from 1.9% (4/209) to 6.6% (10/152) (p = 0.028) and in translated consents from 1.4% (3/209) to 5.9% (9/152) (p = 0.033). There was no statistically significant difference in race, ethnicity, insurance, or tumor type, although there was a non-statistically significant increase in Hispanic patients from 8.1% to 10.5%. Median PFS improved from 1.9 to 2.8 months (HR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.57-0.90, p = 0.003). ECOG 1 v. 0 was associated with inferior OS (HR = 1.35, 95% CI 1.06-1.73, p = 0.017), and BMI ≥18.5 v. &lt;18.5 was associated with superior OS (HR = 0.59, 95% CI 0.37-0.95, p = 0.03). AIC model of CRC (n = 66) revealed that ADI scores of 6-10 were associated with worse PFS and OS (p = 0.022 and p = 0.001, respectively). Conclusions: Our interventions resulted in an increase in accrual of non-English speaking patients, however, there was not yet a statistically significant change in overall race and ethnicity. Our study confirms poorer clinical outcomes for patients with higher ADI scores. Further research and intervention are warranted to mitigate disparities in clinical trial accrual and improve clinical outcomes for disadvantaged patients.

Multi-stakeholder, intentional outreach for improving representative recruitment in Pragmatica–Lung (SWOG S2302).

11019 Background: Studies show that &lt;10% of patients with cancer participate in clinical trials. Pragmatica – Lung (SWOG S2302) utilizes a pragmatic approach for a registrational (FDA) trial that allows less data collection and broader eligibility, thus decreasing barriers to diverse enrollment. S2302 aims to improve overall and diverse accrual by using a novel trial design and multilevel community engagement. Methods: S2302 is a real-world randomized phase III registrational study comparing pembrolizumab + ramucirumab vs investigator-chosen standard therapy in 2nd line advanced/metastatic NSCLC. A multi-stakeholder recruitment plan was developed to improve diverse accrual (with initial focus on recruiting Black patients). The plan was vetted through SWOG communications and SWOG Lung Committee’s Working Group, DEI champion, patient advocate, and community engagement subcommittee. The DEI champion identified sites in the Southeast with high minority accrual in prior trials and completed directed informational visits. An external firm created culturally and linguistically appropriate patient education material, engaged sites with historically high accrual of Black and/or LatinX patients, leveraged advocacy partners to improve community awareness, and monitored enrollment by site. A monthly accrual report with demographic summaries (including age, sex, race, ethnicity) and site enrollment information is generated from SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center to monitor accrual rate and diversity. Results: From March through December 2023 (Table), the study accrued 37% of its goal and is enrolling above its target rate of 25 pts/mo averaging 36/mo over the last 5 months. Of enrolled pts, 58% are male, 13% are Black, and 3% are LatinX; from 59 academic, 67 community (13% rural), and 2 VA sites. Comparatively, LungMAP S1800A (the phase II precursor to S2302) accrued 7% Black and 1.5% LatinX pts with an average accrual of 9.2 pts/mo. Through November, the external firm contacted 24 site PIs (63% community-based), whose sites had collectively enrolled 16 pts, for a normalized pre-call rate of 0.1340 pts/mo. After contact and through November, these sites enrolled 23 pts, a rate of 0.3835 pts/mo – a 186% increase. Conclusions: The intentional, multi-pronged recruitment plan has exceeded historical overall, Black, and LatinX patient accrual rates. The data highlight novel approaches to trial design, recruitment strategies, and increased internal and external collaboration resulting in improved diversity of clinical trial enrollment and may be a potential toolkit for future trials. Support: NIH/NCI grants U10CA180888 and U10CA180819; and in part by Merck Sharp &amp; Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck &amp; Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA, and Eli Lilly and Company. Clinical trial information: NCT05633602 . [Table: see text]

Breast cancer treatment access disparities: A retrospective cohort study of breast cancer in patients treated at a high-complex cancer center in southern Brazil.

e13689 Background: More than seventy-three thousand new breast cancer cases are expected in Brazil for the year 2023, representing the most common malignancy in this country. Delaying time to treatment initiation has been associated with increased risk of worse outcomes. The Brazilian government developed several initiatives to accelerate the access of cancer patients to treatment in an adequate time-bound. One of these is a federal law defining that oncological treatment should begin within 60 days of pathological diagnosis. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed data of newly diagnosed breast cancer patients in 2022–2023 in Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), a public hospital in Porto Alegre, Brazil. The primary objective was to build a predictive model of risk factors that could delay the time to first treatment beyond 60 days from diagnosis. The present analysis describes the socio-demographic characteristics of these patients and explores their impact on the time to oncologic treatment initiation. This project was approved by the Ethics and Research Committee (registration CAAE 71160423.7.0000.5327). Results: 184 patients who started their oncological treatment between 2022-2023 in HCPA were enrolled; 32 patients (17,3%) had their first treatment after 60 days from the diagnosis while 152 (82,7%) were treated before 60 days; 106 (57,3%) patients had studied up to elementary school and 32 (17,3%) were non-white; 53 patients (23%) had been submitted to biopsy outside HCPA. Patients who started their first treatment before 60 days had a mean of 38 days from diagnosis to first treatment while those treated after 60 days had a mean of 75,6 days. To evaluate how socio-demographic factors impacted the time to treatment initiation, a multivariate Poisson log-linear model adjusted for race, city of residence, stage of the disease, and type of first treatment considered different variables. Higher educational level had a statistically significant effect, with a rate ratio (RR) of 0.32 (95% CI 0.157 - 0.650, p &lt; 0.05). We also found that performing biopsy in our institution instead of doing it elsewhere had a statistically significant impact on the time to first treatment, with an RR of 0.512 (95% CI 0.274 - 0.957, p = 0.036). Ethnicity was not related to delay of treatment (p-value=0.125). Conclusions: This study identified that socio-demographic factors are crucial to guarantee the appropriate time to start treatment for breast cancer patients in a middle-income country. Higher educational level had a positive impact on time-to-treatment initiation, as well as to perform biopsy in the same institution patients were treated. In this first analysis, ethnicity, clinical staging, and type of first treatment did not meet the statistical criteria to be considered relevant and the accrual of more patients is needed for further conclusions.

Impact of eligibility criteria discordance on clinical trial accrual in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

e13707 Background: Excessively stringent clinical trial eligibility criteria may hinder trial accrual, differentially exclude racial-ethnic minority groups, and limit generalizability. This study reviewed the association between trial accrual and concordance of eligibility criteria with known drug safety data in DLBCL clinical trials. Methods: Eligibility criteria and accrual of completed phase II/III clinical trials for DLBCL that opened in the US between 2010-2020 were abstracted from ClinicalTrials.gov. Trials missing posted results or studying cellular therapy / transplant were excluded. Concordance with known safety data was assessed by comparing study eligibility criteria for QTc, renal, hepatic, and cardiac function to FDA labels and phase I safety signals of study drugs. Excessively strict discordant criteria (ExSDC) were defined as eligibility criteria without supporting safety signals. Logistic regression +/- dispersion was used for analysis. Results: 58 trials met criteria for inclusion, accruing 6,232 participants. 88% of studies involved a non-FDA-approved agent, 74% were multicenter, 55% were industry sponsored, 66% only accrued in the US, and 86% were phase II. Eligibility criteria were highly variable (Table). Discordance of renal, hepatic, cardiac function, and QTc criteria from known safety data occurred in 31%, 26%, 41%, and 29% of studies, respectively. Race and ethnicity data were not reported in 22% and 45% of studies, respectively. Trials after 2015 were more likely to report race (p=0.04) and ethnicity (p=0.01). In a multivariable model adjusted for international study sites, greater number of ExSDC was associated with a lower proportion of black patients in the trial (OR 0.45, CI 0.29-0.71, p=0.001). ExSDC in cardiac function were most associated with reduced accrual of this minority group (OR 0.17, CI 0.05-0.58, p=0.007). 11 studies (19%) had early termination for lack of accrual (ETLA). In multivariable analysis, greater number of ExSDC was independently associated with ETLA (OR 3.53, CI 1.45-8.64, p=0.006), while multicenter status protected against ETLA (OR 0.05, CI 0.01-0.31, p=0.002). Industry sponsor and concordance of cardiac criteria protected against ETLA in univariable analysis only. Other eligibility criteria were not associated. Conclusions: Eligibility criteria in DLBCL trials varied widely and were often discordant with known safety data. Higher number of ExSDC was associated with lower accrual of black patients and higher risk of ETLA. Optimizing concordance of eligibility criteria with safety data may improve trial accrual and diversity. [Table: see text]

Uptake of recommendations for broadening clinical trial eligibility criteria for patients with brain metastasis and leptomeningeal disease in lung cancer clinical trials: A systematic review.

e23007 Background: Brain metastasis (BM) in patients with lung cancer are relatively frequent (~20%). Clinical trials (CTs) often exclude patients with BM due to concerns about life expectancy, functional status, and toxicity. Restrictive eligibility criteria deter patients with BM from receiving investigational treatments that may be beneficial. In 2017, ASCO, Friends of Cancer Research (FoCR), and the US FDA recommended to expand eligibility criteria to assist in design more representative trials. We examined the uptake of these guidelines in BM/leptomeningeal disease (LMD) inclusion criteria among registered lung cancer CTs. Methods: We extracted eligibility criteria of US-based, phase I/II/III interventional CTs for patients with metastatic lung cancer registered in ClinicalTrials.gov between 10/2012 to 01/2024. CTs registered one year within ASCO/FoCR/FDA published their recommendations were excluded. For each trial, two independent reviewers screened eligibility criteria and classified patients with BM as fully included (active/untreated disease), partially included (treated/stable disease), or excluded, and LMD as included or excluded. Discrepancies were resolved by a third reviewer. Fisher’s exact tests and odds ratio (OR) were obtained by logistic regression. Results: Among 307 CTs, patients with BM were partially included in most CTs (228, 74.3%), excluded in 9 (2.9%) and not mentioned in 35 trials (11.4%). Patients with active BM were included in 35 trials (11.4%). The use of steroids was accepted in 69 trials (22.5%). Only 18 trials (5.8%) included patients with LMD. Most patients with LMD were excluded (135, 44.0%) or not mentioned as criterion (154, 50.2%). A statistically significant difference was observed in the inclusion of patients with BM pre- vs post-recommendations ( p= 0.046). Yet, there was not significant difference in trials with active BM and LMD pre- vs post-recommendations. CTs including patients with active BM or LMD were more likely to appear in CTs explicitly measuring central nervous system outcomes (OR = 4.3; p= 0.002; OR = 14.3; p= 7e-5, respectively). Conclusions: Although existing recommendations to broaden CTs eligibility criteria to include patients with BM showed a significant change, patients with active BM and LMD remained excluded from lung cancer trials. Designing CTs including patients with active BM/LMD is likely to improve patient accrual, increase access to clinical trials and further characterize the investigational drug’s safety and efficacy in this patient population. Exclusion criteria should be clearly justified, and expected toxicity should be reflected in the rationale. As new targeted therapies emerge in lung cancer realm, eligibility criteria should be modernized to fit patients who will be using novel therapies once they are available.

The role of neoadjuvant clinical trials in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

e14022 Background: Novel cytotoxic drugs are commonly first studied in patients with solid tumors who have recurrent disease. If high response rates and durable remissions are observed, further studies are conducted in previously untreated cancers where the novel agent can be combined with radiation or administered as neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) to reduce tumor size before surgery or radiation and to limit systemic dissemination. While NAT can provide critical information on response rates and survival in previously untreated patients, it can add toxicities and delay the administration of standard therapies. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is now standard-of-care in many systemic cancers but is rarely considered in patients with glioblastoma (GBM). This literature review was conducted to describe factors leading to NAT playing an increasingly important role in systemic cancers and a diminishing role in patients with GBM. Methods: Prospective trials published between 1980 and 2023 where patients with newly diagnosed systemic cancers and GBM received NAT prior to radiation were identified in PubMed. Results: During these 43 years, over 5,000 NAT trials in patients with systemic cancers were published. As a result of these studies, NAT is now considered standard therapy for 28 different cancers. In contrast, during the same years only 51 prospective studies were reported evaluating the efficacy of NAT in newly diagnosed GBM. These clinical trials accrued a total of 2,047 patients and evaluated the efficacy of nitrosoureas, temozolomide, platinum-based agents, and targeted therapies. These studies peaked before 2005, when combining temozolomide and radiation was shown to improve survival, and declined thereafter. NAT temozolomide was studied in 12 trials (641 patients) resulting in a median response rate of 35% (range 8.7-51%) and a median overall survival of 12.5 (range 6-22) months. NAT trials in patients with GBM were not associated with unexpected toxicities, major reductions in survival, or poor patient accrual. Conclusions: As in other solid tumors, NAT in patients with GBM is relatively safe and feasible. Enthusiasm for this approach has been limited by the paucity of active agents in recurrent glioblastoma that could be subsequently evaluated in newly diagnosed patients. However, the neoadjuvant setting is ideally suited to rapidly screening novel cytotoxic agents for efficacy as it allows: 1) radiographic response rates in previously untreated patients to be the primary endpoint, 2) small sample sizes, and 3) efficacy results in 2-3 months when patients are transitioned to standard care. Given the well documented safety and feasibility history of using NAT in patients with solid tumors and GBM, this approach has the ability to rapidly identify potentially active, novel cytotoxic agents, especially in patients with MGMT unmethylated, IDH wildtype GBM who are unlikely to benefit from temozolomide.

Decentralized Clinical Trials in Early Drug Development-A Framework Proposal.

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a rethinking of clinical trial design to maintain clinical research activity, with regulatory changes allowing for the wider implementation and development of decentralized design models. Evidence of the feasibility and benefits associated with a remote design comes mainly from observational studies or phase 2 and 3 clinical trials, in which implementation is easier with a better-established safety profile. Early drug development is a slow and expensive process in which accrual and safety are key aspects of success. Applying a decentralized model to phase 1 clinical trials could improve patient accrual by removing geographic barriers, improving patient population diversity, strengthening evidence for rare tumors, and reducing patients' financial and logistical burdens. However, safety monitoring, data quality, shipment, and administration of the investigational product are challenges to its implementation. Based on published data for decentralized clinical trials, we propose an exploratory framework of solutions to enable the conceptualization of a decentralized model for phase 1 clinical trials.

Abstract PO2-17-12: Phase I Trial of alpha-lactalbumin vaccine in high risk operable triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) and patients at high genetic risk for TNBC

Abstract Background: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has a poor prognosis and may be associated with germline mutations. α-Lactalbumin (aLA) is expressed in lactating breasts but not at other times or in other tissues. Expression of aLA is found in 70% of TNBC (PMID: 27322324) so could be an immunologic target for TNBC based on the “retired protein hypothesis” (PMID: 31926646). In pre-clinical studies, vaccination with aLA provided protection from development of autochthonous tumors in transgenic murine models of breast cancer and inhibited growth of established 4T1 transplantable breast tumors in BALB/c mice (PMID: 20512124). Methods: To determine the safety and immunogenicity of aLA, patients with early stage TNBC are being entered in a Phase I trial of aLA with GMP-grade zymosan adjuvant in Montanide ISA 51 VG vehicle. Subjects receive 3 vaccinations given once every 2 weeks. Events of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade ≥ 2 are considered dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Results: CTCAE toxicity by dose level is summarized below. All DLTs were injection site reactions, with ulceration and need for incisional drainage representing the grade 3 events. Seven (7) of 10 patients assayed to date have met protocol specified definitions of an immune response based on ELISpot assays to determine frequencies of T cells producing IFNγ and IL-17 in response to recombinant aLA. Assays for an additional 6 patients will be available in September 2023. Conclusion: Dose level ≤ 2 appears to be the maximum tolerated dose. Based on immune response, additional intermediate dose levels may be studied. An additional cohort of patients receiving concurrent anti-PD1 treatment is being accrued. Accrual of patients with BRCA1/2 or PALB2 mutations planning to undergo prophylactic mastectomy is beginning in order to define the toxicity and immunologic effects in this group and to determine whether inflammatory changes from occult lactational foci will be produced. Funding Source: Department of Defense (W81XWH-17-1-0592 and W81XWH-17-1-0593) Table 1 Worst Toxicity by Dose Level Citation Format: Justin Johnson, Emily Rhoades, Holly Levengood, Halle Moore, Megan Kruse, Erin Roesch, Jame Abraham, Brenna Elliott, Rachel Swartz, Holly Pederson, Elena Haury, Azka Ali, Tiffany Onger, Andrew Sciallis, Zahraa Al-Hilli, Wei Wei, Thaddeus Stappenbeck, George Budd. Phase I Trial of alpha-lactalbumin vaccine in high risk operable triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) and patients at high genetic risk for TNBC [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO2-17-12.

Abstract PO3-20-05: Phase II Study of Genomically Guided Radiation Dose Personalization in the Management of Triple Negative Breast Cancer

Abstract Background: Our group has previously developed the radiosensitivity index (RSI) using a multigene expression model that is directly proportional to tumor radioresistance (high RSI = increased radioresistance). RSI has been previously validated in two datasets of patients with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). In this study, we will run a selective dose personalization study in TNBC patients undergoing breast conservation therapy (BCT). Based on patients RSI scores, they will either receive a radiation therapy (RT) boost of 10 Gy to the tumor cavity or not. Given our data in two independent datasets, the current study will reveal the feasibility and benefit of selective genomic dose personalization in TNBC following BCT. Trial Design: The study is designed as a prospective, nonrandomized, phase II trial of genomically guided RT in the management of TNBC undergoing BCT. Patients will be allocated to one of two groups based on their RSI determination from fresh frozen tissue collected by biopsy or at the time of BCT. These groups will be Group A, RSI optimized whole breast radiotherapy alone or with a 10 Gy boost or Group B, RSI not optimized whole breast radiotherapy with a boost of 10 Gy to tumor cavity. Patients will receive standard of care chemotherapy, neoadjuvant or adjuvant. Eligibility: TNBC patients undergoing BCT. Specific Aims: To determine the three-year local control following genomically guided dose personalization in the management of TNBC following BCT. Secondary objectives include determination of overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and quality of life (QOL) following genomically guided dose personalization. Statistical Methods: The primary hypothesis is the three-year local control rates differ for groups A and B, against the null hypothesis that the two rates are identical. Patients will allocate approximately 78% in group A and 22% in group B and local control rates are expected to be 96% and 75%, respectively. Assuming 80% power and 10% type I error for a log-rank test, 86 patients are needed. An interim analysis will be completed when 4 disease progression events are observed. There will be approximately 43 patients at the time of interim analysis. Patient Accrual: This study is open with 1 patient enrolled at the time of submission. A total of 86 patients will be enrolled. Contact Information: Kamran A. Ahmed MD, Moffitt Cancer Center, email: kamran.ahmed@moffitt.org, Clinical trial information: NCT05115474. Funding: Moffitt and Morton Plant Mease Foundations. Citation Format: Kamran Ahmed, Iman Washington, Matthew Mills, Michelle DeJesus, Youngchul Kim, Ronica Nanda, Javier Torres-Roca, Steven Eschrich, Janis De La Iglesia, John Puskas, Marilin Rosa, Jason Wilson, Paula Lundgren, Negar Golesorkhi, Nazanin Khakpour, Susan Hoover, Marie Lee, John Kiluk, Melissa Mallory, Christine Laronga, Laura Kruper, Brian Czerniecki, Roberto Diaz. Phase II Study of Genomically Guided Radiation Dose Personalization in the Management of Triple Negative Breast Cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO3-20-05.