Access To Primary Care Research Articles

Am I attached? A patient-partnered approach to creating infographics about attachment to primary care in Ontario, Canada

BackgroundHaving a primary care provider is associated with better care experiences and lower care costs. In 2021, INSPIRE-PHC released Primary Care Data Reports - publicly available summaries of administrative billing data about how populations in each of Ontario’s 60 health teams use primary care services. Given the characterization of Canadian primary care systems as ‘in crisis’, publicly available data about primary care at the regional level presented a significant opportunity for knowledge mobilization. An understandable resource could ground the public conversation about primary care access in data. Recognizing the role that lived experience plays in ensuring the public understands research findings, a partnership between patient advisors, Ontario Health Team representatives, researchers, and trainees was established to co-produce public-facing infographics based on primary care data.MethodsEvidence-based guidelines for public health infographic creation and elements of transformative action research guided a six-meeting process to engage up to 14 patient advisors, three Ontario Health Team staff and two primary care trainees. Patient advisors were affiliated with a provincial patient-oriented primary health care research group or a Hamilton-based Ontario Health Team. Ninety-minute meetings were conducted virtually, and notes were shared with attendees to ensure they accurately reflected the conversation. Two consultations with Ontario Health Team-affiliated primary care providers provided direction and ensured project outputs aligned with local priorities.ResultsProject partners shared feedback on draft infographics, audience identification, priority elements from Primary Care Data Reports to include in the infographics, and aesthetic features (e.g., headings, colour scheme, charts). Project partners felt the most important metrics to convey to the public were those that simultaneously reinforced the benefits of primary care on individual health outcomes and health system costs.ConclusionsPatient engagement in research is becoming widespread, but co-developing knowledge products with patient and health system partners is less common. Our approach to engaging patients prevented both oversimplification and unnecessary complexity in a public-facing visual about attachment to primary care.

A review of UK primary care pathways for acute ophthalmic conditions.

Care pathways for the management of acute ophthalmic conditions have developed and transformed significantly over recent years, owing to a combination of legislative changes, policy implementation and the pressing requirement to redistribute increased demand away from traditional secondary care providers through collaboration with primary care. Following UK healthcare devolution in 1999, each nation has developed and implemented their own strategies for managing the growing demands on acute ophthalmology services. Local commissioning across England has seen Enhanced Service Pathways develop to provide acute eye care by primary care optometrists, with provision and access dependent upon locality. Northern Ireland has seen the implementation of a nationwide Primary Eyecare Acute Referral Service, whilst in Scotland and Wales, the respective Governments have redesigned primary care optometry General Ophthalmic Service contracts to incorporate provision of extended investigations and management of acute conditions by optometrists across the nation, recognising the added benefit of optometrists with higher qualifications. This narrative review summarises both peer reviewed and appropriate grey literature articles reporting on acute eye care pathways in primary care. Despite significant progress, particularly during the global COVID-19 pandemic, there is arguably still a great deal of further research and evaluation required relating to pathway innovation, the role of professionals with higher qualifications, including independent prescribing, the role of telemedicine, reassurance around clinical safety, and how digital interconnectivity could potentially add value to collaborative schemes to meet the growing demand on acute eyecare.

Ethnic inequalities in primary care experiences for people with multiple long-term conditions: Evidence from the general practice patient survey

ObjectivesTo examine the relationship between ethnicity and experiences of primary care for people with multiple long-term conditions (MLTCs) and assess the relative importance of demographic, practice, and area-level factors as influences on primary care experiences across ethnic groups. Study designA retrospective study using 2018–19 GP Patient Survey data linked to General Practice Workforce data and small area data published by the Office for National Statistics. MethodsWe conducted multilevel regression analysis to assess the relationship between ethnicity and experience of accessing primary care and interacting with healthcare professionals. We built separate regression models for each outcome and included (i) each covariate separately, (ii) demographic factors and (iii) demographic, practice, and area-level factors. ResultsUpon full adjustment Arab, Bangladeshi, Chinese, Indian, Pakistani, other Asian, mixed white and Asian, and other white people with MLTCs have lower levels of satisfaction with primary care access and interacting with healthcare professionals compared with white British people. The influence of demographic, practice and area-level factors is not uniform across ethnic groups; demographic factors account for the inequalities in levels of satisfaction with access to primary care between white British people and Black other, mixed other, mixed white & Black Caribbean and Gypsy & Irish Travellers. However, practice and area-level factors strengthen inequalities in the experience of accessing primary care for Bangladeshi, Indian and Pakistani people. ConclusionsGiven the link between patient satisfaction and patient-related health outcomes, the lower levels of satisfaction with accessing primary care and interacting with healthcare professionals among the aforementioned minoritised ethnic groups are concerning and require further scrutiny. Qualitative studies are required to understand and address the sources of poor experiences in primary care for minoritised people with MLTCs to improve patient-centred healthcare and outcomes.

Association between all-cause mortality and diabetic avoidable hospitalization among older patients

Abstract Background In South Korea, the prognosis of avoidable hospitalization in diabetes has not been evaluated, even though the incidence rate is considerably high compared to the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development average. This study investigated the association between diabetic avoidable hospitalization after the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus and short- and long-term all-cause mortality. Methods Participants were type 2 diabetes mellitus patients aged 60 years and older and gathered through the National Health Insurance Services Senior cohort data from 2008 to 2019. The outcome measures included five-year and overall period all-cause mortality. The main independent variable was the first-year experience of diabetic avoidable hospitalization after type 2 diabetes mellitus diagnosis. Regression analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazard model. To enhance the robustness of the study results, a sensitivity analysis and inverse probability of treatment weighting method were conducted. Results Among 31 222 participants, 2343 (7.5%) died within 5 years of type 2 diabetes mellitus diagnosis and 5314 (17.0%) died in the overall study period after type 2 diabetes mellitus diagnosis. Participants who experienced diabetic avoidable hospitalization one year after being diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus had a higher risk of all-cause mortality compared to those who did not (Five-year: hazard ratio 1.84, 95% confidence interval 1.54-2.21; Overall period: hazard ratio 1.81, 95% confidence interval 1.60-2.06). Conclusions Enhancing accessibility and quality of primary care to prevent avoidable hospitalization in older patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus is necessary. Key messages • Older patients with T2DM who experienced avoidable hospitalization exhibited higher all-cause mortality rates in both the short and long terms. • Enhancing the accessibility and quality of primary care to prevent avoidable hospitalization in older patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus is necessary.

“When the Bills Keep on Coming:” the Experiences of Seafood Processors During the COVID-19 Pandemic

ABSTRACT Essential workers were at increased risk during the COVID-19 pandemic, including seafood processors who are often rendered invisible within the public sphere. To examine the health and safety concerns of seafood processors, many who are low income or im/migrant workers on H-2B visas, our team conducted qualitative research with 44 participants. We found that in addition to high occupational health hazards that existed before the pandemic, COVID-19 increased workers’ financial risks, which put them in more dangerous health and safety positions, since they needed to work through physical and mental health illness. These financial risks can be seen through the themes of paid sick leave, mental health, economic duress, and primary care access. We conclude with three recommendations to the H-2B visa worker program, which will not only decrease health disparities for im/migrant workers, but also increase health equity across seafood worker populations.

Healthcare access for people with disabilities: a scoping review of COVID-19 policies in Europe

Abstract Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic raised healthcare inequalities, affecting the most vulnerable groups. There is limited evidence of whether the COVID-19 measures and the health system’s preparedness for outbreaks among European countries were sufficient to cover the health access needs of PWDs. Aim To provide a structured overview of the COVID-19 measures and policies addressing access to primary and specialist health services for PWDs during the COVID-19 pandemic in the European Members States (MS) and the United Kingdom (UK), using ten dimensions of healthcare access by Levesque et al. (2013) and the PoliMap taxonomy. Methods This study followed the PRISMA guidelines for Scoping Reviews. A search strategy was employed on PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases from January 2020 to January 2023. Studies published in peer-reviewed journals in English, Portuguese, and Spanish were included, informing a COVID-19 measure or policy and assessing or providing a rationale with access to primary or special healthcare services. Results The final search strategy yielded 2.076 results, 188 studies were reviewed for full-text analysis, and 74 were included in the final analysis. One hundred twenty-one policies or measures addressing primary or specialist care access were identified. Only thirteen target PWDs, focussing on intellectual or mental disability and addressing mental healthcare services. Results revealed that COVID-19 measures for PWDs were oriented to increase health system response capacity and reduce virus transmission, describing a predominantly negative effect on healthcare access for PWDs. Conclusions The needs of PWDs in access to primary and specialist care were not fully covered by the policies and measures placed during the COVID-19 pandemic among the MS and the UK. One-size approaches focussing on the attendance of COVID-19 infection with stigmatizing measures overlook the specific health necessities of this population. Key messages • Adopting disabled-inclusive measures in the daily healthcare provision and engaging PWDs in the policy cycle is paramount to preparing for the next outbreak and public health crises. • Additional research focusing on primary and specialized healthcare access during outbreaks for PWDs, especially with sensory and physical disabilities, is crucial to furthering health equity.

Exploration of primary care models and timely access to care in New Brunswick (Canada)

BackgroundThis correlative study aimed to examine how the different primary care models (physicians in solo practice, physicians in collaborative practice, physicians and nurse practitioners in collaborative practice, after-hours clinics, community centers, or emergency rooms) were associated with their capability to offer timely access to their patients. The data collected from the primary care provider’s perspective was to complete the New Brunswick Health Council results on patients’ perspective.MethodsA convenience sample of 120 primary care providers (33 physicians in solo practice, 33 physicians in collaborative practice, 27 providers in collaborative practice with nurse practitioners, 2 providers working in after-hours clinics, and 10 providers in Emergency departments) responded to an online survey about their primary care models and accessibility. We used the Statistical Package for Social Sciences software to run correlations, independent t-tests and Fisher’s exact tests to compare timely access to care between variable groups.ResultsA positive correlation was observed between patient load (or the number of patients under a primary care provider’s practice), age and years of experience. However, the patient load did not translate to more timely access to care. However, a statistically significant difference (p = 0.032) was observed when primary care providers kept appointment slots available for daily urgent requests. When a primary care provider booked all available appointment slots, only 85% of them could offer timely appointments (in 5 days or less), compared to 97% who could deliver it when appointment slots were left open in their daily schedule. The primary care model (solo vs. collaboration), the use of health technologies and the type of provider did not significantly influence timely access to care. In contrast, the primary care providers who reported teleworking (or working remotely) were less likely to offer timely access to care.ConclusionTimely access to care is not always available to patients, even those with a primary care provider. Certain organizational practices may improve access to care and should be integrated into primary care in New Brunswick and elsewhere in Canada.

Organizational innovations related to Primary Care Access Points (GAP) for unattached patients in Quebec: a multi-case qualitative study

BackgroundBeing attached to a primary care (PC) provider is at the core of a strong primary health care system. Centralized waiting lists (CWL) for unattached patients have been implemented in eight provinces of Canada to support the attachment process. In Quebec, the Ministry of Health mandated the implementation of Primary Care Access Points (GAP) across the province to help unattached patients navigate the health system while awaiting attachment through the CWL. Several local health territories developed complementary innovations to the GAP to respond to local population needs. This paper aims to describe five organizational innovations implemented locally.MethodsThis multi-case qualitative study was conducted in four local health territories in the province of Quebec. Fifty-two semi-structured interviews with healthcare managers, nurses, physicians, other health professionals and administrative staff were conducted between April 2023 and April 2024. An interview guide was developed based on existing frameworks on the implementation of innovations and the evaluation of the GAP. Thematic analysis was conducted using NVivo software. Inductive and deductive approaches were used to develop relevant codes and themes. Logic models were built to describe the organizational innovations.ResultsFive organizational innovations are described. First, a multidisciplinary clinic aimed at responding to patients with mental health issues was implemented. Second, a nurse clinic was implemented to provide temporary care for patients with unstable chronic illnesses. The third innovation is a mobile proximity clinic where unattached GAP patients are first evaluated by a paramedic before receiving care from a nurse. Fourth, a pharmacist trajectory was implemented to increase engagement of community pharmacists to respond to GAP patients. The last innovation is a decentralized GAP offering in-person nursing care to unattached GAP patients.ConclusionsDescriptions of these five innovations are key to inform other territories and provinces on ways to improve access for unattached patients while they are waiting to be attached. The introduction of the GAP and the organizational innovations, suggests a transition where access to PC services does not rely solely on attachment status.

Churning the tides of care: when nurse turnover makes waves in patient access to primary care

BackgroundTeam-based primary care (PC) enhances the quality of and access to health care. The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) implements team-based care through Patient Aligned Care Teams (PACTs), consisting of four core members: a primary care provider, registered nurse (RN) care manager, licensed vocational nurse, and scheduling clerk. RNs play a central role: they coordinate patient care, manage operational needs, and serve as a patient point of contact. Currently, it is not known how varying levels of RN staffing on primary care teams impact patient outcomes.ObjectiveThis study aims to empirically assess how the stability of RN staffing within team-based primary care affects patient access to care.MethodsA retrospective database review using clinical and administrative data from the VHA over 24 months. Participants included 5,897 PC PACTs across 152 VHA healthcare facilities in the United States and its territories. The stability of personnel in the RN role was categorized as: RN continuous churn, RN staffing instability and RN vacancy. All 3 categories were compared to teams with RN stability (i.e., same person in the role for the entire 24-month period). Access measures included: average third-next-available appointment, established patient average wait time in days, urgent care utilization, emergency room utilization, and total inbound-to-outbound PC secure messages ratio.ResultsRN continuous churn within PACTs had a significant impact on third-next-available appointment (b = 3.70, p < 0.01). However, RN staffing instability and vacancy had no significant relationship with any of the access measures. Several risk adjustment variables, including team full-time equivalency, team stability, relative team size, and average team size, were significantly associated with access to health care.ConclusionsTeams are impacted by churn on the team. Adequate staffing and team stability significantly predict patient access primary care services. Healthcare organizations should focus on personnel retention and strategies to mitigate the impact(s) of continuous RN turnover. Future research should examine the relative impact of turnover and stability of other roles (e.g., clerks) and how team members adapt to personnel changes.

Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess the Feasibility of a Novel Clinical Decision Support System Based on the Automatic Generation of Alerts through Remote Patient Monitoring

Background/Objectives: Early identification of complications in chronic and infectious diseases can reduce clinical deterioration, lead to early therapeutic interventions and lower morbidity and mortality rates. Here, we aimed to assess the feasibility of a novel clinical decision support system (CDSS) based on the automatic generation of alerts through remote patient monitoring and to identify the patient profile associated with the likelihood of severe medical alerts. Methods: A prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial was conducted. Patients with COVID-19 in home isolation were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either conventional primary care telephone follow-up plus access to a mobile app for self-reporting of symptoms (control group) or conventional primary care telephone follow-up plus access to the mobile app for self-reporting of symptoms and wearable devices for real-time telemonitoring of vital signs (case group). Results: A total of 342 patients were randomized, of whom 247 were included in the per-protocol analysis (103 cases and 144 controls). The case group received a more exhaustive follow-up, with a higher number of alerts (61,827 vs. 1825; p &lt; 0.05) but without overloading healthcare professionals thanks to automatic alert management through artificial intelligence. Baseline factors independently associated with the likelihood of a severe alert were having asthma (OR: 1.74, 95% CI: 1.22–2.48, p = 0.002) and taking corticosteroids (OR: 2.28, 95% CI: 1.24–4.2, p = 0.008). Conclusions: The CDSS could be successfully implemented and enabled real-time telemonitoring of patients’ clinical status, providing valuable information to physicians and public health agencies.

Factors Influencing Primary Care Access for Common Mental Health Conditions Among Adults in West Africa: Protocol for a Scoping Review.

Mental health conditions are expressed in various ways in different people, and access to health care for these conditions is affected by individual factors, health care provider factors, and contextual factors. These factors may be enablers or barriers to accessing primary care for mental health conditions. Studies have reported a gap in treatment for mental health conditions in many countries in West Africa due to barriers along the access pathway. However, to the best of our knowledge, there is yet to be a review of the factors influencing access to primary care for common mental health conditions among adults in West Africa. Our scoping review will explore the factors influencing access to primary care for common mental health conditions among adults aged 18 years and older in West Africa from 2002 to 2024. Our review will follow the approach to scoping reviews developed by Arksey and O'Malley in 2005. This approach has five stages: (1) identifying the research question; (2) identifying relevant studies; (3) selecting studies; (4) charting the data; and (5) collating, summarizing, and reporting the results. We will search electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Cairn.info, and Google Scholar), source gray literature from relevant websites (the World Health Organization and country-specific websites), and manually explore reference lists of relevant studies to identify eligible records. Pairs of independent authors (NYA-B, RNBA, VR, or DS) will screen the titles, abstracts, and full texts of studies based on predefined eligibility criteria. We will use a data extraction tool adopted from the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis to chart the data. Deductive, thematic analysis will be used to categorize factors influencing access to mental health care under predetermined themes. New themes derived from the literature will also be charted. Database searches were conducted between February 1, 2024, and February 12, 2024. As of July 2024, the review report is being drafted, and it will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal. The results of the review will inform decision-making on policies, programs, and their implementation in West Africa to improve primary care access for mental health care. DERR1-10.2196/58890.

Analysis of the structure of Basic Health Units in Brazil to conduct telehealth actions: a comparison of two cross-sectional studies

BackgroundTelehealth uses Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in distance health-related activities between professionals, managers, and patients of health services. This cross-sectional study compared the ICT infrastructure available in Brazilian Basic Health Units (BHU) for telehealth actions, along with evaluation cycles of the National Program for Improving Access and Quality of Primary Care (PMAQ-AB).MethodsData from the second and third cycles of the PMAQ-AB were used. A total of 22,021 BHUs were evaluated concerning the availability of computers, cameras, stereo boxes, microphones, printers, television, and internet available. The presence of each ICT equipment assigned a score to each BHU. The sum of these scores assigned a final score to the BHU and was used for comparison among different Brazilian regions. The data were analyzed descriptively and by Wilcoxon test (p ≤ 0.05) using SPSS v. 25.ResultsThe increase in the median number of ICT equipment was statistically significant in the BHU in Brazil and the Brazilian regions (p < 0.001). The South, Southeast, and Midwest regions had the highest median scores in both cycles.ConclusionsThe availability of ICT equipment for telehealth actions in BHU improved over the PMAQ-AB cycles, with differences in the ICT structure between Brazilian regions.

The Transition of Care Between Emergency Department and Primary Care: An Integrative Systematic Review.

To identify the barriers and enablers of effective transitions of care between the emergency department and primary care providers. Successful patient care transitions from the emergency department to primary care providers are important because this process has implications for the quality, patient safety, and cost of patient care. Failure in follow-up consultations with primary care can result in representations to the emergency department, which can impact negative emergency department operational issues throughout the entire hospital. An integrative systematic review was reported according to PRISMA guidelines. The reviewers followed a systematic review protocol registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022316165). A search strategy was applied to extract articles from included databases: CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Scopus, ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health databases. Articles were assessed using a predetermined eligibility criterion. Quality assessment and a narrative synthesis were conducted. Of the 1200 articles screened, 25 studies were included. Four additional articles were identified from reference lists. The range of study designs included: four qualitative, three mixed methods and 22 quantitative studies. A total of 291,012 patients were represented. Successful care transition was enhanced by access to insurance, ease of payment methods, effective communication, prior booked primary care provider appointments and access to transportation. Many patients experienced financial toxicity, and the shortfall between fees charged and rebates provided was found to influence primary care provider follow-up compliance. Future recommendations to provide safe and effective transitions of care would be to optimise supported self-management for patients and deliver timely and clear communication with standardised discharge documentation to be shared between the emergency department and primary care providers. There is no one-size-fits-all approach to delivering safe care transitions between emergency department and primary care providers, and future research should target high-risk groups. Prospero: CRD42022316165.

Measuring and optimizing the spatial accessibility of primary health care in remote and rural areas: a case study of Liannan Yao Autonomous County in China

The need for equitable access to primary healthcare services in the current global context has attracted widespread attention, prompting nations to continuously enhance their grassroots medical service levels. In response, China launched the "Healthy China" initiative, which prioritizes the enhancement of national health as a core goal of the healthcare system and uses this opportunity to deepen reforms aimed at strengthening primary care. However, in remote and rural areas, the optimization of medical resource allocation and the achievement of balanced service development remain critical challenges owing to limited resources. This study selected Liannan Yao Autonomous County, which is situated in the northwestern corner of Guangdong Province, as a case study due to its remote mountainous location, underdeveloped economy, and minority region characteristics. Through field research and interviews, this study thoroughly explored the needs of both supply and demand, factoring in elements such as the service capability of healthcare facilities and residents' travel thresholds to enhance the two-step floating catchment area model, thus making it more applicable to remote villages. By integrating electric bikes and cars, which are the primary means of transportation in rural areas, this study conducted a thorough analysis and comparison of the accessibility of medical services in Liannan Yao Autonomous County (Liannan County) . The results reveal significant disparities in healthcare accessibility, an uneven distribution of medical resources, and varying impacts of transportation conditions and facility service capabilities on accessibility. Notably, the study revealed that improving transportation conditions alone has limited effects in rural areas; the key lies in balancing medical service capabilities and the rationality of overall layouts. From the perspectives of equity and efficiency, this study employs the equitable coverage model and the efficiency-driven model to construct two scenarios, comparing accessibility changes in Liannan County under both conditions and proposing strategies to improve the spatial layout of local healthcare facilities. This research not only deepens the understanding of healthcare service accessibility in rural areas but also provides a scientific basis for optimizing resource allocation and enhancing primary medical services, offering valuable guidance and reference for Liannan County and other similar rural regions.

Inclusion of disability in primary healthcare facilities and socioeconomic inequity in Brazil.

To describe disability-related performance and inequality nationwide in Brazil, and the changes that took place between 2012 and 2019 after the introduction of Programme for Improving Primary Care Access and Quality (PMAQ). We derived scores for disability-related care and accessibility of primary healthcare facilities from PMAQ indicators collected in round 1 (2011-2013), and round 3 (2015-2019). We assessed how scores changed after the introduction of PMAQ. We used census data on per capita income of local areas to examine the disability-specific care and accessibility scores by income group. We undertook ordinary least squares regressions to examine the association between PMAQ scores and per capita income of each local area across implementation rounds. Disability-related care scores were low in round 1 (18.8, 95%CI 18.3-19.3, out of a possible 100) and improved slightly by round 3 (22.5, 95%CI 22.0-23.1). Accessibility of primary healthcare facilities was also poor in round 1 (30.3, 95%CI 29.8-30.8) but doubled by round 3 (60.8, 95%CI 60.3-61.3). There were large socioeconomic inequalities in round 1, with both scores approximately twice as high in the richest compared to the poorest group. Inequalities weakened somewhat for accessibility scores by round 3. These trends were confirmed through regression analyses, controlling for other area characteristics. Disability-related and accessibility scores also varied strongly between states in both rounds. People with disabilities are being left behind by the Brazilian healthcare system, particularly in poor areas, which will challenge the achievement of universal health coverage.

Inequalities in Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions: An International Comparison of High-Income Countries

ObjectiveTo examine the differences in inequalities in Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions (ACSC) hospitalizations relative to socioeconomic status across nine countries, namely Australia, Canada, England, Finland, France, New Zealand, Spain, Switzerland, and the United States (US). ApproachThe International Collaborative on Costs, Outcomes, and Needs in Care (ICCONIC) research collaborative developed national data sets with hospitalization and sociodemographic data aggregated to small-area levels and pooled across countries using a common data model. Inequalities were assessed using both the slope index of inequality and the relative index of inequality. ResultsThis study developed a common definition and set of codes for ACSC hospitalizations that proved to be comparable across countries and regions. Consistent socioeconomic gradients were observed in all countries with higher ACSC hospitalization rates for individuals in most disadvantaged areas. The greatest difference in hospitalizations between the highest and lowest income quintiles were observed in New Zealand (1603 per 100,000), Finland (1802 per 100,000) and England (1955 per 100,000). ConclusionsThe high-income countries included in this study displayed many commonalities in inequalities in ACSC hospitalizations. As a proxy measure of primary care access and quality, the observed inequalities may implicate disparities in health care quality and access for the lowest socioeconomic status groups. ImplicationsBarriers to health care access in low socioeconomic groups remain a complex and multifaceted issue. Future research should investigate the underlying contributing factors to the observed ACSC hospitalization equity gradients, including primary care delivery model, remuneration approach, and population structure.

Assessment of primary health care accessibility and patients’ perception in Madurai district: a geo-medical study

Assessment of primary health care accessibility and patients’ perception in Madurai district: a geo-medical study

Examining the Care Experiences of People Experiencing Homelessness in Kingston

Background Across Canada, approximately 235,000 individuals face housing instability, and homelessness has been associated with an increased use of emergency department (ED) care. EDs are a safety net for people experiencing homelessness (PEH), when faced with limitations to primary care access, such as limited service hours and locations. PEH have reported negative ED care experiences, including feeling judged, not having health concerns taken seriously, and experiencing stigmatizing behaviour. Prior negative experiences contribute to the avoidance of care services, exacerbating issues for PEH. Objective This study examines the experiences of unhoused populations accessing ED services, to better understand the adversity they face. Methods The study is participatory and cross-sectional, using the sensemaking Spryng.io platform to survey patients at the Kingston Health Sciences Centre EDs. Sensemaking methodology (SM) uses a mixed-methods research approach that collects data through storytelling. This enables individuals to naturally convey complex information and make sense of their experiences. Within the sensemaking survey, individuals who self-identified as a PEH answered an additional subset of questions about their experiences accessing care. Follow-up focus group discussions (FGDs) will take place at St. Vincent de Paul, an organization that supports people in Kingston with resources such as food, clothes, and housing. FGDs will be used to validate the sensemaking results and co-create care improvement strategies. Conclusion By engaging PEH, our results can lead to actionable care improvement strategies. The study is also a foundation for future research collaborating with PEH and community partners, to mitigate negative care experiences.

Social and Environmental Determinants of Health and Cardio-Kidney-Metabolic Syndrome–Related Mortality

It is not well understood if and how various social and environmental determinants of health (SEDoH) are associated with mortality rates related to cardio-kidney-metabolic syndrome (CKM) across the US. To study the magnitude of the association strength of SEDoH with CKM-related mortality at the county level across the US. This cross-sectional, retrospective, population-based study used aggregate county-level data from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (WONDER) data portal from 2010-2019. Data analysis occurred from September 2023 to January 2024. A total of 7 diverse SEDoH were chosen, including median annual household income, percentage of racial and ethnic minority residents per county, fine particulate air pollution (PM2.5) concentrations, high-school completion rate, primary health care access, food insecurity, and rurality rate. The primary outcome was county-level age-adjusted mortality rate (aaMR) attributable to CKM. The association of county-level CKM-related aaMR with the 7 SEDoH was analyzed using geographically weighted models and the model median coefficients for each covariate studied. Data from 3101 of 3243 counties (95.6%) were analyzed. There was substantial variation in SEDoH between states and counties. The overall pooled median (IQR) aaMR (2010-2019) in the US was 505.5 (441.3-578.9) per 100 000 residents. Most counties in the lower half of the US had rates much higher than the pooled median (eg, Southern US median [IQR] aaMR, 537.3 [466.0-615.9] per 100 000 residents). CKM-related mortality was positively associated with the food insecurity rate (median [IQR] β = 6.78 [2.78-11.56]) and PM2.5 concentrations (median [IQR] β = 5.52 [-11.06 to 19.70]), while it was negatively associated with median annual household income (median [IQR] β = -0.002 [-0.003 to -0.001]), rurality (median [IQR] β = -0.32 [-0.67 to 0.02]), high school completion rate (median [IQR] β = -1.89 [-4.54 to 0.10]), racial and ethnic minority rate (median [IQR] β = -0.66 [-1.85 to 0.89]), and primary health care access rate (median [IQR] β = -0.18 [-0.35 to 0.07]). In this cross-sectional study of county-level data across the US, there were substantial geographical differences in the magnitude of the association of SEDoH with CKM-related aaMR. These findings may provide guidance for deciding local health care policy.

Supply-side factors influencing national health insurance uptake, access and use of primary health care: Evidence from the Upper West Region, Ghana

Supply-side factors, such as the availability of health facilities, equipment, practitioners, and drugs, are crucial for improving global healthcare systems. However, systematic evidence of how these factors affect health insurance clients’ access to primary healthcare (PHC) services in Ghana is lacking. This study addresses this gap by examining the impact of these factors on insured individuals' access to PHC services in Wa Municipality. An explanatory sequential mixed-methods design was employed, involving a quantitative survey of 413 insured individuals randomly selected from 40 communities and 47 healthcare facilities. Purposive sampling was used for qualitative interviews with 17 healthcare providers and 20 key insured informants. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics, correlation, independent t-tests, and binary logistic regression, while qualitative data were thematically analysed to provide insight into the quantitative findings. Result from quantitative data showed that Community-Based Health Planning and Services (CHPS) were more accessible than hospitals, diagnostic centres, and health centres. Proximity to health facilities influenced access to PHC services and National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) uptake. Perceived availability and functionality of healthcare equipment also affected NHIS uptake. Qualitatively, health facilities reported a shortage of human resources, such as midwives and nurses, for PHC service delivery. Triangulating quantitative and qualitative results show that healthcare supplies and skilled professionals are essential for NHIS uptake and access to PHC services. This study recommends that Government of Ghana prioritise expanding healthcare facilities, recruiting and retaining skilled practitioners, procuring medical equipment, and equitably distributing essential medications to improve access to essential healthcare services in underserved areas.