Access For Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Research Articles

Single arterial access versus standard access in TAVI: results from a large multicenter registry

Abstract Background The transfemoral approach has become the gold standard primary access for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) due to low complication rates. An additional secondary access (ScA) is used for angiographic guidance of the procedure. Recently, small, single-center studies demonstrated feasibility of single-access for transfemoral TAVI without a secondary access. However, comparative and large-scale data are missing. Purpose We assessed vascular and bleeding complications of ScA and Single access (SA) approaches in a large multicenter registry to evaluate both strategies. Methods The PULSE registry (Plug or sUture based vascuLar cloSurE after TAVI) retrospectively evaluated data of 10,120 patients who underwent transfemoral TAVI at 10 high-volume German heart centers from 2016 to 2021. In 9,457 patients who qualified for analysis ScA (80.7% femoral, 19.3% radial) were performed in 8709 (92%) and SA in 748 (8%). Outcomes were evaluated in accordance with the Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC-3) definitions. Results Median age was 81.9[IQR 78.2, 85.1] years and 48.9% of patients were female (median logistic EuroSCORE II: 3.3% [IQR 2.1, 5.6]). Peripheral artery disease was comparable between groups (13.5 vs. 14.0%, p=0.73). While overall major access-related vascular complications did not differ significantly (6.1% vs. 4.8%, p=0.20), there was a higher incidence of minor complications for ScA compared to SA (9.0% vs. 2.8%, p<0.001). Secondary access complications amounted to 2.7% in the ScA group and were mainly characterized as bleeding (1.2%) and pseudoaneurysms (1.2%) mostly treated conservatively (1.2%), yet in some cases surgical repair was needed (0.8%). No significant difference was observed regarding type III/IV bleeding (4.1% vs. 4.3%, p=0.91), stroke rate (2.4% vs. 3.6%, p=0.05), stage III/IV acute kidney injury (2.4% vs. 2.4%, p=1.00) or all-cause 30-day mortality (5.8% and 5.7%, p=0.99) for ScA compared to SA groups. Conclusion In patients treated with transfemoral TAVI, a single access approach was associated with lower rates of minor access-related vascular complications without compromising overall outcomes, suggesting potential benefits of a minimally-invasive TAVI approach with the omission of additional vascular access.

Procedural and clinical outcomes according to ultrasound-guided access in TAVI: a propensity-matched comparative sub-analysis from the PULSE registry

Abstract Background Access-related vascular and bleeding complications during transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Ultrasound-guided (USG) puncture may reduce the incidence of these events, particularly in large-bore arterial access. However, large-scale data on this approach are limited and it has not yet fully been implemented into standard clinical practice during TAVI. Purpose We compared access-related vascular and bleeding complications in USG versus fluoroscopy-guided (FG) access from a large multicenter TAVI registry. Methods The PULSE registry (Plug or sUture based vascuLar cloSurE after TAVI) retrospectively evaluated data of 9,295 patients who underwent transfemoral TAVI at 10 high-volume German heart centers from 2016 to 2021. USG and FG access were performed in 1,992 (21.4%) and 7,303 (78.6%) patients, respectively. A propensity score was used to match 1,023 FG with 1,023 USG access patients in a 1:1 fashion. The primary endpoint was a composite of minor and major vascular complications at the TAVI-access site or bleeding type II-IV. Outcomes were evaluated in accordance with the Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC-3) definitions. Results Mean age was 81.9±6.25 years and 48.0% of patients were female. Comorbidities and clinical variables were well-balanced in matched groups. The overall risk profile was comparable in USG vs. FG (mean EuroSCORE II: 3.4 [2.1, 6.4] vs. 3.6 [2.2, 5.7], p=0.54). The primary end point occurred in 12.0% in the USG and 17.7% in the FG group, p<0.001. While major large bore access-related vascular complications did not differ significantly (3.5% vs. 4.2%, p=0.49), there was a trend towards lower minor complications for USG compared to FG (5.9% vs. 7.8%, p=0.096). Large bore access-related bleeding occurred in 5.5% versus 7.8% (p=0.04) of patients. Endovascular balloon inflation was required in 0.6% and 3.3% (p<0.001) of all large-bore access vascular complications. Stroke (1.7% vs. 1.5%, p=0.86) and stage III/IV acute kidney injury (3.0% vs. 2.2%, p=0.42) were similar in both groups. Conclusion In patients treated with transfemoral TAVI, ultrasound-guidance for gaining access was associated with lower rates of access-related vascular complications or type II-IV bleeding. Endovascular treatment was required more frequently in case of a fluoroscopy-guided approach. These findings challenge the fact that most TAVI procedures were performed with fluoroscopy-guidance.

Long-term clinical and imaging outcomes of patients undergoing percutaneous femoral intervention following TAVI-related vascular access complications

Abstract Introdcution: Vascular access complications (VAC) are the most common in-hospital adverse event following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Often, ileo-femoral VAC requires bail-out percutaneous interventions with either prolonged balloon inflation and/or stent implantation. The long-term outcomes of these procedures have not been characterized. We aim to assess the clinical and imaging outcomes of patients who underwent bailout percutaneous vascular interventions due to VAC following TAVI. Methods Single-centre prospective study including all consecutive patients with a VAC following trans-femoral TAVI, between 2015-July 2023. VAC was defined as uncontrolled bleeding, acute occlusion or flow limiting stenosis of the femoral vessel leading to percutaneous treatment. Clinical and imaging follow-up was performed with bilateral arterial ultrasound (US) Doppler to assess patency and peak systolic velocity of common femoral arteries. Results A total of 1518 patients underwent TF-TAVI, of which 107 (7%) underwent concomitant ileo-femoral percutaneous angioplasty (PTA) intervention in the same day as TAVI. In patients submitted to PTA, 7 were treated to gain access for TAVI, and 100 (7%) were performed to treat vascular access complications. At a mean follow-up time of 23±3 months, 37 patients died (37%), 6 (16%) from in-hospital complications and 31 (84%) from non-vascular causes after discharge. From the surviving 63 patients (study group) – mean age 83±6 years-old, 29% male, 46% with previous peripheral arterial disease –, 24 underwent bilateral US. Unable to perform imaging on 39 patients due to geographical or mobility issues. At a mean follow-up time of 30±23 months, only 6 patients (10%) reported intermittent claudication, of which 4 (67%) had pre-TAVI symptoms. No patient had at rest symptoms or amputation history. All but one had patent vessel on US. The mean peak systolic velocity of the treated vessel and the contralateral vessel were 71.1±22.9cm/s and 73.1±23.8cm/s, respectively, with no statistically significant difference between them in each patient (mean difference 1.9±25.4, p=0.709). We found no statistically significant differences between peak systolic velocities between both vessels in each patient, accordingly with the treated vessel (Table 2). Conclusion This prospective study shows that patients submitted to percutaneous bailout iliofemoral interventions have a very low rate of lower limb adverse events with very good patency rates at mean follow up of 2.5 years.

Independent association between radial secondary access and stroke in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Abstract Background Radial access has become the primary approach for invasive coronary angiography due to its lower complication rate than femoral access. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) frequently requires a secondary access, which has traditionally been femoral access. However, radial access for TAVI is feasible and gaining popularity, but data on its safety and complication rates is still limited. Purpose To evaluate the occurrence of stroke rate in patients undergoing a TAVI procedure with femoral or radial secondary access. Methods A prospective single-center TAVI registry of 2327 patients who received a TAVI procedure between 2019 and 2022 was conducted. All procedures had the primary access over the femoral route. 337 (14.5%) patients had a secondary access over the radial route, whereas 1990 (85.5%) received a femoral secondary access. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of stroke within the hospital stay. Both groups were compared using the t-test or the Mann-Whitney U test according to the distribution of the data. In a second step, a multivariable model was created in which parameters were included that were associated with the endpoint in the previous analysis, as well as parameters that are known to be associated with stroke. Results: Patients were 81.1 ± 6.3 years old, with a Euroscore II of 5.3 ± 6. A total of 610 (26.2%) patients received a balloon-expandable valve. The primary endpoint (stroke within 30 days of the TAVI procedure) was met by 94 (4%) of all patients. Stroke occurred more often in the group with radial secondary access (6.6% (22) vs. 3.6%(72), p = 0.012). Other significant differences between the two groups included (radial vs. femoral access): burden of atrial fibrillation (36.8% vs. 44.6%, p = 0.007), arterial hypertension (87.4% vs. 92%, p = 0.007), Euroscore II (4.6 vs. 5.5, p = 0.006), and frailty (25.2% vs. 40%, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of secondary diagnosis of diabetes or coronary artery disease, age, occurrence of NYHA class III/IV, gender, or cerebral artery disease. In the multivariate analysis including Age, Euroscore II, NYHA class, gender, secondary diagnosis of arterial Hypertension, diabetes or cerebral artery disease, arterial fibrillation, Frailty and radial secondary access, only radial secondary access was independently associated with in-hospital stroke (p = 0.01). Conclusion Radial secondary access was significantly associated with an increased risk of in-hospital stroke following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in our study population. Intense manipulation of the guidewire and catheter to reach the ascending aorta at the beginning of the procedure and to reach the descending aorta for the final angiogram of the primary access vessel may be causative and should be minimized.

TCT-897 Experience Using Brachiocephalic Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Access as an Alternative Option for Patients Unsuitable for Transfemoral or Left Subclavian Approach: A Two-Center Series

TCT-897 Experience Using Brachiocephalic Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Access as an Alternative Option for Patients Unsuitable for Transfemoral or Left Subclavian Approach: A Two-Center Series

Exploring Optimal Strategies for Surgical Access in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has revolutionised the management of severe aortic stenosis, particularly for patients deemed high risk or inoperable for traditional surgical aortic valve replacement. The transfemoral approach is the preferred route whenever feasible, attributed to its minimally invasive nature, reduced procedural morbidity, and shorter recovery times. In total, 80-90% of TAVI procedures are performed via the transfemoral route. However, anatomical constraints such as severe peripheral arterial disease, small vessel diameter, or significant vessel tortuosity can preclude the use of this access site. In such cases, alternative access strategies must be considered to ensure the successful implantation of the valve. This review aims to provide a comprehensive summary of the various surgical techniques available for TAVI access, exploring the rationale, technical aspects, and challenges associated with each method. We will explore alternative routes, including the transapical, transaortic, transaxillary, and transcarotid approaches, highlighting their respective benefits and limitations.

Importance of pseudoaneurysms after TAVI - a retrospective analysis of 2063 patients.

Background: Bifemoral arterial access is common in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), with a primary treatment access (TAVI access) and a secondary non-TAVI access. Pseudoaneurysm (PSA) is an important complication of femoral arterial puncture. Major vascular complications after TAVI are well described, but little is known about PSA. Patients and methods: A total of 2063 patients underwent transfemoral TAVI between January 2014 and January 2020. Vascular ultrasound of the common femoral artery was assessed before and after TAVI. We compared patient characteristics, periprocedural risk scores, procedural characteristics, and access site bleeding events according to Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 (VARC-3) criteria, length of stay (LOS), and all-cause mortality at one year between patients with (46) and without (2017) PSA. Results: The incidence of PSA after TAVI was 2.2% (46/2063). All PSA were successfully treated with ultrasound-guided manual compression (UGMC) or thrombin injection (UGTI) without complications. Patients with PSA had lower platelet counts (210×1000/μl vs. 234×1000/μl; p<0.05), more heart failure symptoms on admission (91% vs. 25%; p<0.05), were more often treated with (N)OACs for atrial fibrillation (AF; 54% vs. 38%; p <0.05), and were less often treated with aspirin (35% vs. 51%; p<0.03). Multivariate analysis identified secondary access site (odds ratio [OR] 8.11; p<0.001) and (N)OAC therapy (OR 1.31; p = 0.037) as risk factors for PSA development. PSA is associated with VARC-3 type 1-3 access site bleeding and longer LOS (15.2 ± 11.3 d vs. 11.6 ± 8.9 d; p<0.01), but this did not affect one year mortality (17% vs. 14%; p = 0.53). Conclusions: Pseudoaneurysms are an important complication after TAVI and are associated with access site bleeding and prolonged hospital stay. (N)OAC therapy and secondary access are important risk factors. Pseudoaneurysms can be safely and effectively treated with thrombin injection and do not affect one-year mortality.

The role of external iliac artery diameter indexed to BSA score in predicting vascular access complications after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Aortic stenosis is the most common primary valve disease and requires invasive treatment. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) from a transfemoral access is a routine intervention worldwide. To investigate the correlation between external iliac artery diameter (EIAD) indexed to body surface area (BSA) (EIAD-BSA) and access site complications in patients undergoing TAVI via transfemoral access (TF) (TF-TAVI). Patients underwent TF-TAVI in 2017-2019 at the Upper-Silesian Medical Center in Katowice. Based on the preoperative multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT), pre-specified measurements of the ilio-femoral vessels were performed. The results were indexed to BSA and body mass index (BMI). Complications after TAVI were defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 (VARC-3). The primary outcome regarding the adverse events after TAVI was the composite of access site complications requiring surgical intervention or blood transfusion. The registry included 193 unselected patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. Vascular and access-related complications including bleeding occurred in 17.1% of patients. Major TAVI access site complications (VARC-3) were reported in 5.7% of patients, while minor complications (VARC-3) occurred in 2.6%. EIAD-BSA demonstrated a positive correlation with the access site complications primary endpoint. Patients with greater EIAD-BSA had a numerically higher number of access site adverse events requiring surgical intervention or blood transfusion: n = 12 (5%) vs. n = 4 (4%), p = 0.011. External iliac artery diameter indexed to BSA could be an underestimated indicator of unfavorable outcomes after TF-TAVI, predicting periprocedural access site complications.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Access Sites: Same Goals, Distinct Aspects, Various Merits and Demerits.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been established as a safe and efficacious treatment for patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS). Despite being initially developed and indicated for high-surgical-risk patients, it is now offered to low-risk populations based on the results of large randomized controlled trials. The most common access sites in the vast majority of patients undergoing TAVI are the common femoral arteries; however, 10-20% of the patients treated with TAVI require an alternative access route, mainly due to peripheral atherosclerotic disease or complex anatomy. Hence, to achieve successful delivery and implantation of the valve, several arterial approaches have been studied, including transcarotid (TCr), axillary/subclavian (A/Sc), transapical (TAp), transaortic (TAo), suprasternal-brachiocephalic (S-B), and transcaval (TCv). This review aims to concisely summarize the most recent literature data and current guidelines as well as evaluate the various access routes for TAVI, focusing on the indications, the various special patient groups, and the advantages and disadvantages of each technique, as well as their adverse events.

Transaxillary versus transfemoral access as default access in TAVI: A propensity matched analysis

BackgroundTransfemoral (TF) access is default in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Transaxillary (TAx) access has been shown to be a safe alternative in case of prohibitive iliofemoral anatomy, but whether TAx as preferred access has similar safety and efficacy as TF access is unknown. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes between patients treated with self-expanding devices using TF or TAx route as preferred access in TAVI. MethodsA single center cohort of 354 patients treated using TAx as preferred access and a multi-center cohort of 5980 patients treated using TF access were compared. Propensity score matching was used to reduce selection bias and potential confounding. After propensity score matching, each group consisted of 322 patients. Clinical outcomes according to VARC-2 were compared using chi-square test. ResultsIn 6334 patients undergoing TAVI, mean age was 81.4 ± 7.0 years, 57% was female and median logistic EuroSCORE was 14.7% (IQR 9.5–22.6). In the matched population (age 79.3 ± 7.0, 50% female, logistic EuroSCORE 13.4%, IQR 9.0–21.5), primary outcomes 30-day and one-year all-cause mortality were similar between Tax and TF groups (30 days: 5% versus 6%, p = 0.90; 1 year: 20% versus 16%, p = 0.17). Myocardial infarction was more frequent in patients undergoing Tax TAVI compared with TF (4% versus 1%, p = 0.05), but new permanent pacemakers were less frequently implanted (12% versus 21%, p = 0.001). ConclusionTAx as preferred access is feasible and safe with outcomes that are comparable to TF access.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Using the Transcervical Vascular Access (from a 7-Year Experience from a Swiss Tertiary Center)

The gold-standard transfemoral (TF) access for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is not suitable in 10% to 15% of patients, and alternative accesses are needed. Studies have suggested that the transcervical (TC) access might yield outcomes comparable to the TF access. In our center, TC-TAVI is the first-line alternative to TF-TAVI. We herein present our 7-year experience regarding the use of the TC access in TAVI. We included all consecutive patients referred for TC-TAVI between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2022. Data regarding the patients' characteristics,perioperative and 30-day outcomes were prospectively collected. Patients were separated into 2 temporal groups (group 1: January 1, 2016 to June 30, 2019; group 2: July 1, 2019 to December 31, 2022) to assess the changes of their characteristics and outcomes over time. A total of 95 patients were included, with more belonging to group 2 (n=56 vs n=39 in group 1). Patients in group 2 were significantly younger (81.0 [interquartile range 77.0 to 87.0] vs 89.0 [interquartile range 83.0 to 92.0] years, p <0.001) and had a higher prevalence of hypertension (87.5% vs 66.7%, p=0.028) and chronic pulmonary disease (35.7% vs 15.4%, p=0.029). There was no significant difference regarding other co-morbidities or surgical scores. All-cause mortality and the risk of stroke at 30days were low and similar (group 2 vs group 1, 3.6% vs 2.5%, p=0.787 and 1.8% vs 0%, p=0.397, respectively), as were the risks of permanent pacemaker implantation, postoperative acute kidney injury, cardiac tamponade, life-threatening bleeding, and major vascular complications. In conclusion, the use of the TC access increased over time. The rates of adverse events did not change, despite patients from mid-2019 onward having slightly more co-morbidities.

Nationwide experience with transcarotid transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Insights from the POL-CAROTID registry.

The carotid artery is an alternative access route for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), especially useful in patients unsuitable for traditional access routes including transfemoral (TF), subclavian, transapical, and aortic. To investigate the feasibility and safety of transcarotid (TC) access for TAVI in comparison to the TF approach in a multicenter setting. A total of 41 patients, treated between December 2014 and December 2018, were retrospectively reported to the Polish Registry of Common Carotid Artery Access for TAVI (POL-CAROTID). The median follow-up time was 619 (365-944) days, and Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) definitions were applied. Clinical outcomes were compared with 41 propensity-matched TF-TAVI patients. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) patients' age was 78.0 (7.2) years, and 29 patients (70.7%) were men. Prohibitive iliofemoral anatomy and/or obesity (46.3%) and/or the presence of a stent graft in the abdominal aorta (31.7%) were the most common indications for TC-TAVI. Device success for TC-TAVI was comparable with the matched TF-TAVI group (90.2% vs. 95.3%, respectively, P = 0.396), and no periprocedural mortality was observed. Moreover, early safety was similar between the two groups (92.7% vs. 95.3%, respectively, log-rank P = 0.658) with only 1 case of non-disabling stroke during the first month after TC-TAVI. Consequently, no cerebrovascular events were observed in the mid-term, and the clinical efficacy of TC-TAVI corresponded well with TF-TAVI (90.2% vs. 92.7%, respectively, log-rank P = 0.716). A total of 4 (9.8%) deaths were noted in the TC-TAVI cohort in comparison to 3 (7.3%) in the TF-TAVI group. The results of the study indicated that the first cohort of Polish patients with implantations of second-generation transcarotid transcatheter heart valves had a similar prognosis to TF-TAVI with regard to safety and feasibility. TC access may be considered an optimal alternative for patients in whom the TF approach is precluded.

Combined CT Coronary Artery Assessment and TAVI Planning.

Computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the aorta and the iliofemoral arteries is crucial for preprocedural planning of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS), because it provides details on a variety of aspects required for heart team decision-making. In addition to providing relevant diagnostic information on the degree of aortic valve calcification, CTA allows for a customized choice of the transcatheter heart valve system and the TAVI access route. Furthermore, current guidelines recommend the exclusion of relevant coronary artery disease (CAD) prior to TAVI. The feasibility of coronary artery assessment with CTA in patients scheduled for TAVI has been established previously, and accumulating data support its value. In addition, fractional flow reserve determined from CTA (CT-FFR) and machine learning-based CT-FFR were recently shown to improve its diagnostic yield for this purpose. However, the utilization of CTA for coronary artery evaluation remains limited in this specific population of patients due to the relatively high risk of CAD coexistence with severe AS. Therefore, the current diagnostic work-up prior to TAVI routinely includes invasive catheter coronary angiography at most centers. In this article, the authors address technological prerequisites and CT protocol considerations, discuss pitfalls, review the current literature regarding combined CTA coronary artery assessment and preprocedural TAVI evaluation, and provide an overview of unanswered questions and future research goals within the field.

Left Axillary Access for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in a Patient With Two Dependent Internal Mammary Artery Grafts and a Permanent Left-Sided Implanted Pacemaker

Transfemoral access has been established as the gold standard approach for the majority of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). However, in cases with anatomical difficulties or severely diffused peripheral arterial disease, alternative vascular access may be considered such as the transaxillary approach. We present the case of a 92-year-old gentleman with exertional dyspnea due to severe symptomatic aortic stenosis and a history of peripheral femoro-femoral bypass surgery, coronary arterial bypass surgery and a permanent dual-chamber left-side implanted pacemaker. Due to the high surgical risk and the severe anatomical difficulties, the method of TAVI using the left axillary approach was opted. A 14-F vascular sheath was inserted with surgical cutdown and with fluoroscopic guidance while small injections of contrast confirmed the non-occlusive position and the patency of the left internal mammary artery (LIMA) graft. A stiff guidewire was used to cross the heavily calcified aortic valve and subsequently was placed into the left ventricle. Balloon aortic valvuloplasty was performed followed by a successful TAVI with no significant aortic regurgitation or paravalvular leak. The patient recuperated uneventfully and was discharged after 72 h. Axillary access for TAVI is a feasible option for high-risk patients with extended peripheral arteriopathy. To our knowledge this is the first case report describing the implantation of a newer type of intra-annular self-expanding valve platform in a nonagenarian patient with severe comorbidities and such a remarkable history of multiple previous interventions in the selected access site. Meticulous upfront strategy planning and efficient collaboration between specialties is of outmost importance in hybrid procedures for favorable clinical outcomes, especially in cases with challenging anatomies.

Emergent transcatheter aortic valve implantation combined with enterectomy for acute decompensated heart failure caused by severe aortic stenosis and strangulated femoral hernia.

A 74-year-old female was admitted to our department with orthopnea, oliguria, and vomiting. She had a pacemaker implanted two years ago. Physical examination revealed an 8 cm × 6 cm bulge in the right groin. The transthoracic echocardiography showed that the area of aortic orifice was 0.4 cm2 and the left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) was 25%. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons score was 25.6%. Abdominal ultrasound demonstrated right femoral hernia with intestinal obstruction. Because of hemodynamic instability and the risk of intestinal necrosis, emergent transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) combined with hernia repair was scheduled to perform. The procedure was performed under general anesthesia with intubation. The transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) showed that the maximal and mean pressure gradient was 64 and 35 mmHg, respectively (Panels A–C); coronary angiography indicated no coronary artery stenosis. We chose left femoral artery access for TAVI through a totally percutaneous approach. According to TEE, aortic root angiography and based on the balloon pre-dilation (Panel D), 26 Venus-A self-expandable valve was successfully implanted (Panel F). And then, the right oblique cutdown was performed, and a tense hernial sac was revealed, in which we observed an 8-cm-long necrotic bowel (Panel E). The gastrointestinal surgeon had to resect the strangulated and anastomose the normal bowel. TEE showed that the maximal and mean aortic pressure gradient was 13 and 7 mmHg, respectively (Panels G and H). Thirteen days later after the operation, the patient was discharged from the hospital with no complications. Follow-up echocardiography demonstrated that the device position was appropriate, no perivalvular leakage, and the LVEF increased to 50%.

Using Intravascular Lithotripsy to Facilitate Transfemoral Arterial Access for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

Peripheral vascular assessment is important in pre-procedural planning for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). While alternative vascular access sites have been used in patients with hostile iliofemoral anatomy, femoral access has been established as the superior access method for procedural outcomes. Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) can facilitate transfemoral access for TAVI in patients with calcific stenoses of the iliofemoral arteries. This How-To-Do-It article describes the procedural planning and methods for performing IVL in these patients.

Clinical outcomes following single access transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

We describe the first experience using calcification of anatomical landmarks to obviate the need for transcatheter aortic valve implantation(TAVI) alignment aortography and secondary TAVI access. TAVI alignment conventionally involves secondary femoral access for contrast aortography using a second catheter. Secondary femoral access accounts for up to 25% of all vascular complications. Heavily calcified aortic leaflets are often visible fluoroscopically and can act as markers for TAVI alignment. We considered 100 consecutive patients for transfemoral TAVI. The first group was considered for a conventional dual access technique and the subsequent group was considered for a single access technique. Relevant baseline, and procedural and outcome measures were recorded. Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. Balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valves(THV)were used in all cases. THV implantation was successful in 100% of cases with no procedural or in-hospital mortality. Procedural time and contrast use were lower in the single access group. There were no Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-2major vascular complications with the single access technique. This is the first study describing the use of calcification of anatomical landmarks to obviate the need for secondary TAVI access. Notable observations included successful device implantation in all cases, no VARC-2 major vascular complications, comparable rates of paravalvular leak and permanent pacemaker requirement, shorter procedural times, and lower contrast use. Single access TAVI is a viable alternative technique to minimize vascular access, contrast use, and procedural duration in experienced centers and with selected patients, allowing successful device implantation and low complication rates while further streamlining TAVI workflow.

Vascular Access for TAVI in the Era of Intravascular Lithotripsy

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an established alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) across a range of indications and surgical risk categories [1]. Peripheral vascular assessment is important in pre-procedural planning for TAVI, as femoral access has been established as the superior access method for procedural outcomes [2,3]. Unfortunately, severe calcific iliofemoral disease can impede femoral access, and alternative access methods, which carry higher risks of peri-procedural complications, were previously used in these cases.

Distal Radial Secondary Access for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: The Minimalistic Approach

BackgroundAlthough not yet recommended by the guidelines, distal radial access, a new site for cardiovascular interventions, has been rapidly acknowledged and adopted by many centers due to its high rate of success, safety and fewer complications. We present our experience using secondary distal radial access during transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), proposing a new, even more minimal approach. MethodsAs of November 2020, a systematic distal radial approach as secondary access site for TAVI was adopted in our center. Primary endpoints were technical success and major adverse events (MAEs). Secondary endpoints: the access site complication rate, hemodynamic and clinical results of the intervention, procedural related factors, crossover rate to the femoral access site, and hospitalization duration (in days). ResultsFrom November 2020, 41 patients underwent TAVI using this strategy. Patients had a mean age of 76 ± 11.2 years, 41% were male. Six (14.63%) patients received a balloon-expandable valve and 35 (85.37%) received a self-expandable valve. TAVI was successful in all cases. No complications occurred due to transradial access. Puncture success, defined as completed sheath placement was maximum (N = 41/41,100%) and emergent transfemoral secondary access was not required in any case. Primary transfemoral vascular access site complications occurred in 7 cases (17%) of which 4 (13.63%) were resolved through distal radial access: one occlusion, two flow-limiting stenoses and four perforations of the common femoral artery. There were no additional major vascular complications at 30 days. Overall MACE rate was 2.4%. ConclusionThe use of the distal radial approach for secondary access in TAVI is safe, feasible and has several advantages over old access sites.

TAVI via alternative access routes: patient selection and 10-year center experience

Abstract Background Femoral access is considered the gold standard for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). However, this route might be precluded due to the presence of tortuosity, small vessel diameter and/or peripheral artery disease. We aimed to investigate TAVI through an alternative access (AA), focusing on the selection criteria and clinical outcomes compared to the femoral route (TF). Methods We conducted an all-comers longitudinal single-centre prospective registry in whom a TAVI was performed. The feasibility, safety and efficacy of TAVI by means of an access route other than standard TF was assessed, according to the VARC-2 criteria. The prospective surgical criteria used at our institution to accept an AA route were: a) TF deemed inappropriate; b) acceptable haemorrhagic risk; c) acceptable general anaesthesia risk; and d) adequate anatomy and diameter within acceptable range (subclavian, axillar, transaortic) or e) age &amp;lt;85 years and non-frail patient (transapical). The primary endpoint was all-cause death at 1-year. Results From 2008 to 2018, there were 548 patients submitted to TAVI [median age 84 (79–87) years, males 45.4%]. An AA route was used in 100 patients (79 trans-apical, 9 trans-aortic, and 12 trans-subclavian), with a decreasing rate over follow-up (−11% per year). Compared to TF, these patients were younger [80 (77–84) vs. 85 (80–87) years; p&amp;lt;0.001) with a similar baseline surgical risk as per EuroSCORE II [5.1 (3.3–9.0) vs. 4.7 (3.3–7.0); p=0.410). AA patients presented a higher burden of atherosclerotic disease, namely coronary (54.0 vs. 41.3%; p&amp;lt;0.001) and peripheral artery disease (35.0 vs. 16.5%, p&amp;lt;0.001) despite a lower number of other comorbidities (e.g. glomerular filtration rate &amp;lt;50mL/min: 53.1 vs. 64.8%; p=0.030). Left ventricular ejection fraction (56±13 vs 55±12%; p=0.203) and aortic stenosis severity (e.g. valve area: 0.70±0.19 vs. 0.67±0.18cm2; p=0.302) were similar between groups. Haemorrhagic events (minor or major) following TAVI were less often documented in the AA group (11.0 vs 21.7%; p=0.015), contrasting with de novo atrial fibrillation (18.5 vs 7.6%; p=0.048). Overall, 67 patients met the primary endpoint (18.8 vs 16.2%; p=0.584). After adjusted multivariate analysis, the independent predictors of one-year mortality did not include the TAVI access route. Conclusion In the first 10 years of experience, 1 in every 6 patients was treated with a TAVI by means of an AA, most often trans-apically initially and, nowadays, via a trans-subclavian approach. The use of meticulous prospective selection criteria seems to explain the one-year similar results, regardless of the access route. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.