Abstract Background and Aims The routine evaluation of VA involves visual, palpatory, and auscultatory examinations, as well as monitoring of venous pressure and other parameters. Surveillance indices include Flow Volume (FV) and Resistance Index (RI) obtained by Doppler ultrasound (DU) and Access Blood Flow (Qa) obtained by the Ultrasound Dilution Method (UDM) are well known. On the other hand, the MSS-U11C electronic stethoscope (Fig. 1) and dedicated application (Fig. 2) developed by Pioneer Inc. converts vascular sound into digital data and calculates the INDEX value obtained from the sound intensity (dB) analyzed by the vascular sound visualization system. In this study, we examined the correlation between INDEX values and conventional surveillance indices. Method 1. Eighty-three cases in which INDEX, FV, RI, and Qa were simultaneously measured in hemodialysis patients with AVF at the Artificial Kidney Department of Osaka Metropolitan University Hospital were included. 2. The measurement site for INDEX was just above the anastomosis of the AVF. 3. FV and RI were measured using a KONICA MINOLTA SONIMAGE HS2 diagnostic ultrasound system with the brachial artery as the measurement site. 4. Measurements were expressed in Median [IQR], and for statistical examination, Pearson's correlation coefficient was used for the correlation of each measurement, transformed to the natural logarithm to satisfy the assumption of normality of the residuals. The significance level for all hypothesis tests was 5%. For statistical analysis, R version 4.2.1 (https://www.r-project.org/foundation/) with the “rms” and “RcmdrPlugin.EZR ” packages were used. 5. This study protocol was conducted in accordance with the Principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The ethics review boards of Osaka Metropolitan University approved the study (No. 2021-243). Opt-out consent was obtained instead of written informed consent. Results INDEX showed a significant positive correlation with Qa and FV (R = 0.449, P = 0.002 / R = 0.484, P < 0.001, respectively), INDEX showed a significant negative correlation with RI (R = −0.336, P = 0.002). Conclusion INDEX measurement using an electronic stethoscope is a monitoring index and showed a positive correlation with FV and Qa, which are established surveillance indices, and a weak negative correlation with RI. In Japan, FV and RI are commonly used as surveillance indices, but it has been reported that these indices can be underestimated or overestimated depending on the skill of the examiner, and that Qa requires specialized equipment and cannot be measured depending on the puncture site. We believe that monitoring by stethoscope is influenced by subjective factors of staff members, which may lead to differences in evaluation, but INDEX could become a more quantitative and standardized indicator. In addition, the electronic stethoscope could be used without any difference compared to the stethoscope currently in clinical use.
Read full abstract