Accelerator-based Intensity-modulated Radiation Therapy Research Articles

Dosimetric Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance–Image Guided Radiation Therapy 3-Source Co-60 and Linear Accelerator–Based Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Plans for Pancreas Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

Dosimetric Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance–Image Guided Radiation Therapy 3-Source Co-60 and Linear Accelerator–Based Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Plans for Pancreas Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

Feasibility of magnetic resonance imaging–guided liver stereotactic body radiation therapy: A comparison between modulated tri-cobalt-60 teletherapy and linear accelerator–based intensity modulated radiation therapy

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to investigate the dosimetric feasibility of liver stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) using a teletherapy system equipped with 3 rotating 60Co sources (tri-60Co system) and a built-in magnetic resonance imager (MRI). We hypothesized tumor size and location would be predictive of favorable dosimetry with tri-60Co SBRT. Methods and materialsThe primary study population consisted of 11 patients treated with SBRT for malignant hepatic lesions whose linear accelerator (LINAC)–based SBRT plans met all mandatory Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 1112 organ-at-risk (OAR) constraints. The secondary study population included 5 additional patients whose plans did not meet the mandatory constraints. Patients received 36 to 60 Gy in 3 to 5 fractions. Tri-60Co system SBRT plans were planned with ViewRay system software. ResultsAll patients in the primary study population had tri-60Co SBRT plans that passed all RTOG constraints, with similar planning target volume coverage and OAR doses to LINAC plans. Mean liver doses and V10Gy to the liver, although easily meeting RTOG 1112 guidelines, were significantly higher with tri-60Co plans. When the 5 additional patients were included in a univariate analysis, the tri-60Co SBRT plans were still equally able to pass RTOG constraints, although they did have inferior ability to pass more stringent liver and kidney constraints (P < .05). A multivariate analysis found the ability of a tri-60Co SBRT plan to meet these constraints depended on lesion location and size. Patients with smaller or more peripheral lesions (as defined by distance from the aorta, chest wall, liver dome, and relative lesion volume) were significantly more likely to have tri-60Co plans that spared the liver and kidney as well as LINAC plans did (P < .05). ConclusionsIt is dosimetrically feasible to perform liver SBRT with a tri-60Co system with a built-in MRI. Patients with smaller or more peripheral lesions are more likely to have optimal liver and kidney sparing, with the added benefit of MRI guidance, when receiving tri-60Co–based SBRT.

Dosimetric effect of small bowel oral contrast on conventional radiation therapy, linear accelerator–based intensity modulated radiation therapy, and helical tomotherapy plans for rectal cancer

PurposeThis study evaluated the dosimetric effect of small bowel oral contrast on conventional radiation therapy, linear accelerator--based intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and helical tomotherapy (HT) treatment plans. Methods and materialsThirteen patients with rectal cancer underwent computed tomography (CT) simulation with oral contrast (CCT) in preparation for chemoradiation therapy. The contrast in the small bowel was contoured, and a noncontrast CT scan (NCCT) was simulated by reassigning a CT number of 0 Hounsfield units to the contrast volume. Conventional, IMRT, and HT plans were generated with the CCT. The plan generated on the CCT was then recalculated on the NCCT, maintaining the same number of monitor units for each field, and the plans were not renormalized. Dosimetric parameters representing coverage of the planning target volume with 45 Gy (D98%, D95%, D50%, and D2%) and sparing of the bladder and peritoneal cavity (D50%, D30%, and D10%) were recorded. The ratio of dose calculated in the presence of contrast to dose with contrast edited out was recorded for each parameter. A paired Student t test was used for comparison of plans. ResultsFor conventional plans, there was <0.1% variance in the dose ratio for all volumes of interest. For IMRT plans, there was a 1% decrease in the mean dose ratio, and the range of dose ratios for all volumes was greater than that for HT or conventional plans. For HT plans, for all volumes of interest, the mean dose ratio was <0.2%, and the range for all patients was <1%. For all IMRT dosimetric parameters, the difference was in the order of 1% of the mean dose (P < .05). The dose difference was not statistically significant for the conventional or HT plans. ConclusionsThe use of CCT during CT simulation has no clinically significant effect on dose calculations for conventional, IMRT, and HT treatment plans and may not require replacement of the contrast with a CT number of 0 Hounsfield units.

Helical tomotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: Dosimetric comparison with linear accelerator-based step-and-shoot IMRT

Linear Accelerator-based Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT), either as step-and shoot (SS) or in dynamic mode, is now considered routine in the definitive management of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Helical TomoTherapy (HT) is a new platform to deliver IMRT. This study aims to compare step-and-shoot Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (SS IMRT) with dynamic Helical TomoTherapy (HT) dosimetrically in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Twelve patients with HNSCC, previously treated with SS IMRT, were re-planned on HT using the same CT dataset. Plans were compared for target coverage and organs-at-risk (OARs) sparing. Sparing of parotids was assessed after stratifying for side (contralateral vs. ipsilateral) and site of disease (laryngopharynx vs. oropharynx). Normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCP) were also compared for the parotid glands. All HT plans showed improvement in target coverage and homogeneity, and reduction in OAR doses as compared to SS IMRT plans. For PTV 66, the mean V 99 improved by 14.65% ( P = 0.02). Dose Homogeneity (D 10-90 ) was significantly better in the HT plans (mean 2.07Gy as compared to 4.5Gy in the SS IMRT plans, P = 0.02). HT resulted in an average reduction of mean parotid dose of 12.66Gy and 18.28Gy for the contralateral and ipsilateral glands ( P = 0.003) respectively. This translated into a 24.09% and 35.22% reduction in Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP) for the contralateral and ipsilateral parotids respectively ( P < 0.01). Site of disease (laryngopharynx vs. oropharynx) did not have any significant impact on parotid sparing between SS IMRT and HT. The maximum dose to the spinal cord showed a mean reduction of 12.07Gy in HT plans ( P = 0.02). Helical Tomotherapy achieved better target coverage with improved OAR sparing as compared to SS IMRT. The significant reduction in mean parotid doses translated into meaningful reduction in NTCP, with potential clinical implications in terms of reduction in Xerostomia and improved quality of life in patients with HNSCC.

The use of film dosimetry of the penumbra region to improve the accuracy of intensity modulated radiotherapy

Accurate measurements of the penumbra region are important for the proper modeling of the radiation beam for linear accelerator-based intensity modulated radiation therapy. The usual data collection technique with a standard ionization chamber artificially broadens the measured beam penumbrae due to volume effects. The larger the chamber, the greater is the spurious increase in penumbra width. This leads to inaccuracies in dose calculations of small fields, including small fields or beam segments used in IMRT. This source of error can be rectified by the use of film dosimetry for penumbra measurements because of its high spatial resolution. The accuracy of IMRT calculations with a pencil beam convolution model in a commercial treatment planning system was examined using commissioning data with and without the benefit of film dosimetry of the beam penumbrae. A set of dose-spread kernels of the pencil beam model was calculated based on commissioning data that included beam profiles gathered with a 0.6-cm-i.d. ionization chamber. A second set of dose-spread kernels was calculated using the same commissioning data with the exception of the penumbrae, which were measured with radiographic film. The average decrease in the measured width of the 80%-20% penumbrae of various square fields of size 3-40 cm, at 5 cm depth in water-equivalent plastic was 0.27 cm. Calculations using the pencil beam model after it was re-commissioned using film dosimetry of the penumbrae gave better agreement with measurements of IMRT fields, including superior reproduction of high dose gradient regions and dose extrema. These results show that accurately measuring the beam penumbrae improves the accuracy of the dose distributions predicted by the treatment planning system and thus is important when commissioning beam models used for IMRT.