Acceleration-selective Arterial Spin Labeling Research Articles

Turbo spin-echo-based enhanced acceleration-selective arterial spin labeling without electrocardiography or peripheral pulse unit triggering and contrast enhancement for lower extremity MRA

PurposeLower extremity magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) without electrocardiography (ECG) or peripheral pulse unit (PPU) triggering and contrast enhancement is beneficial for diagnosing peripheral arterial disease (PAD) while avoiding synchronization failure and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of turbo spin-echo-based enhanced acceleration-selective arterial spin labeling (eAccASL) (TSE-Acc) of the lower extremities with that of turbo field-echo-based eAccASL (TFE-Acc) and triggered angiography non-contrast enhanced (TRANCE). MethodsNine healthy volunteers and a patient with PAD were examined on a 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system. The artery-to-muscle signal intensity ratio (SIR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated. The arterial visibility (1: poor, 4: excellent) and artifact contamination (1: severe, 4: no) were independently assessed by two radiologists. Phase-contrast MRI and digital subtraction angiography were referenced in a patient with PAD. Friedman's test and a post-hoc test according to the Bonferroni-adjusted Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used for the SIR, CNR, and visual assessment. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. ResultsNo significant differences in nearly all the SIRs were observed among the three MRA methods. Higher CNRs were observed with TSE-Acc than those with TFE-Acc (anterior tibial artery, p = 0.014; peroneal artery, p = 0.029; and posterior tibial artery, p = 0.014) in distal arterial segments; however, no significant differences were observed upon comparison with TRANCE (all p > 0.05). The arterial visibility scores exhibited similar trends as the CNRs. The artifact contamination scores with TSE-Acc were significantly lower (but within an acceptable level) compared to those with TFE-Acc. In the patient with PAD, the sluggish peripheral arteries were better visualized using TSE-Acc than those using TFE-Acc, and the collateral and stenosis arteries were better visualized using TSE-Acc than those using TRANCE. ConclusionPeripheral arterial visualization was better with TSE-Acc than that with TFE-Acc in lower extremity MRA without ECG or PPU triggering and contrast enhancement, which was comparable with TRANCE as the reference standard. Furthermore, TSE-Acc may propose satisfactory diagnostic performance for diagnosing PAD in patients with arrhythmia and chronic kidney disease.

Optimized enhanced acceleration selective arterial spin labeling (eAccASL) for non-gated and non-enhanced MR angiography of the hands

PurposeEnhanced acceleration selective arterial spin labeling (eAccASL) was introduced as non-enhanced and non-gated magnetic resonance angiography (MRA). This technique has not been applied to hand MRA. The objective of this study was to optimize the eAccASL for MRA of the hands and to investigate the factors for MRA visibility of the hands. MethodsTwenty healthy volunteers were examined on a 1.5 T MR system. To evaluate arterial visualization, we compared four different acceleration-encoding (AENC) values (i.e., 0.12, 0.29, 0.58, and 0.87 m/s2). Image quality score regarding the MRA depiction of the proximal artery (range, 0–10), the distal artery (0–5), and venous contamination (0–5) was evaluated by three radiologists. We measured the peak to peak arterial blood flow velocity (Vpp) measured by phase contrast cine MRI and hand temperature as the factors for arterial visualization. Qualitative scores were compared with Friedman's tests. Spearman's correlation of qualitative scores with Vpp and hand temperature was performed to analyze influencing factors. ResultsFor the distal arterial depiction, scores at AENC 0.12 (median, 9.0) and AENC 0.29 (8.0) were significantly better (both P < 0.0001) than those at AENC 0.87 (5.5). For the proximal arterial depiction, scores at AENC 0.12 (2.25) and AENC 0.29 (2.0) were significantly better (P < 0.001 and P < 0.01, respectively) than those at AENC 0.87 (1.5). Conversely, venous contamination scores at AENC 0.12 (3.0) and AENC 0.29 (3.0) were significantly worse (both P < 0.0001) than those at AENC 0.87 (4.0). There were significantly negative correlations between venous contamination and Vpp at AENC 0.12 (ρ = −0.56, P = 0.01), and 0.29 (ρ = −0.68, P = 0.001), whereas hand temperatures were not significantly correlated with scores (all P > 0.05). ConclusioneAccASL MRA of the hands was optimized by using low AENC values (0.12–0.29 m/s2). Venous contamination may increase with elevation of arterial blood flow.

Multi-organ comparison of flow-based arterial spin labeling techniques: Spatially non-selective labeling for cerebral and renal perfusion imaging.

PurposeFlow‐based arterial spin labeling (ASL) techniques provide a transit‐time insensitive alternative to the more conventional spatially selective ASL techniques. However, it is not clear which flow‐based ASL technique performs best and also, how these techniques perform outside the brain (taking into account eg, flow‐dynamics, field‐inhomogeneity, and organ motion). In the current study we aimed to compare 4 flow‐based ASL techniques (ie, velocity selective ASL, acceleration selective ASL, multiple velocity selective saturation ASL, and velocity selective inversion prepared ASL [VSI‐ASL]) to the current spatially selective reference techniques in brain (ie, pseudo‐continuous ASL [pCASL]) and kidney (ie, pCASL and flow alternating inversion recovery [FAIR]).MethodsBrain (n = 5) and kidney (n = 6) scans were performed in healthy subjects at 3T. Perfusion‐weighted signal (PWS) maps were generated and ASL techniques were compared based on temporal SNR (tSNR), sensitivity to perfusion changes using a visual stimulus (brain) and robustness to respiratory motion by comparing scans acquired in paced‐breathing and free‐breathing (kidney).ResultsIn brain, all flow‐based ASL techniques showed similar tSNR as pCASL, but only VSI‐ASL showed similar sensitivity to perfusion changes. In kidney, all flow‐based ASL techniques had comparable tSNR, although all lower than FAIR. In addition, VSI‐ASL showed a sensitivity to B1‐inhomogeneity. All ASL techniques were relatively robust to respiratory motion.ConclusionIn both brain and kidney, flow‐based ASL techniques provide a planning‐free and transit‐time insensitive alternative to spatially selective ASL techniques. VSI‐ASL shows the most potential overall, showing similar performance as the golden standard pCASL in brain. However, in kidney, a reduction of B1‐sensitivity of VSI‐ASL is necessary to match the performance of FAIR.

Non-enhanced and Non-gated MR Angiography for Robust Visualization of Peripheral Arteries Using Enhanced Acceleration-selective Arterial Spin Labeling (eAccASL).

This study aimed to assess the feasibility for applying enhanced acceleration-selective arterial spin labeling (eAccASL) to non-electrocardiogram-gated and non-enhanced peripheral MRA. We compared eAccASL and background suppressed single shot turbo field echo (TFE)-triggered angiography non-contrast-enhanced sequence (BASS TRANCE) required electrocardiographic-gating in eight volunteers and three patients. In the volunteer study, eAccASL demonstrated a comparable arterial visualization compared with BASS TRANCE. In patient observation, the advantages with eAccASL were found in arterial visualization on the collateral vessels and without artifacts affected by arrhythmia events.

Influence of the cardiac cycle on velocity selective and acceleration selective arterial spin labeling.

PurposeIn this study, the influence of the cardiac cycle on the amount of label produced by a velocity‐selective (VSASL) and acceleration‐selective arterial spin labeling (AccASL) module was investigated.MethodsA short‐PLD sequence was developed where a single VSASL‐ or AccASL‐module was preceded by pCASL labeling to isolate the arterial blood pool. ASL subtraction was performed with label/control images with similar cardiac phase and time‐of‐measurement, followed by retrospective binning in 10 cardiac phase bins. ASL signal variation over the heart cycle was evaluated and tested for significance using a permutation test.ResultsVSASL and AccASL showed significant arterial signal fluctuations over the cardiac cycle of up to ~36% and ~64%, respectively, mainly in areas containing large arteries. pCASL also showed significant signal fluctuations, of up to ~25% in arteries. Raw label/control images confirmed that the observed signal fluctuations were caused by the amount of label produced during the cardiac cycle, rather than inflow‐effects, because the raw images did not all show equal cardiac phase dependence.No significant effects of the cardiac cycle were found on the gray matter ASL‐signal.ConclusionSignificant influence of the cardiac cycle on the generated label was found for spatially nonselective ASL‐sequences. Hence, to become independent of the cardiac cycle, sufficient averages need to be taken. Alternatively, these findings could be highly interesting for the purpose of quantifying pulsatility more distally in the vascular tree.

Abstract TP62: Acceleration-Selective Asl Perfusion Imaging as an Alternative for Dsc in an Acute Stroke Population

Introduction: Differentiation of core, penumbra, and benign oligemia (based on capillary perfusion) is of increasing importance in treating acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Both CT and DSC perfusion MRI rely on similar kinetics which may be influenced by arrival delay. Arterial spin labeling (ASL) MRI serves as a non-invasive alternative but similarly suffers from delayed arrival. Here we explore acceleration-selective ASL (accASL), a method not dependent on arrival delay, for identifying regions of critically low perfusion. Methods: Forty-four patients with AIS and pre-treatment MRI including DWI, DSC and accASL MRI were included in this study. Perfusion and diffusion lesions were qualitatively and quantitatively (i.e. through manual delineation) rated on blinded DSC-DWI and AccASL-DWI image pairs. The mean transit time (MTT) map was used for DSC perfusion evaluation. Results: Only 43 patients were included in our analysis due to uninterpretable MTT maps in one patient. A perfusion lesion was identified on 38 of the MTT maps and 32 of the accASL images. The mean perfusion lesion volume was larger (p&lt;0.001) on MTT than on the accASL images; 120 (±103) versus 32 (±52) ml, respectively. The mean lesion on DWI was 10 (±13) ml, and accASL detected perfusion deficit related better to DWI lesion than MTT (R 2 of 0.20 and 0.08, respectively). MTT identified a perfusion lesion in 8 patients where accASL did not. The median MTT perfusion lesion in these patients was 103 (3-198) ml and the median DWI lesion volume was 2 (0-7) ml. Two patients demonstrated a perfusion deficit on the accASL images (5 and 49 ml) but not on the MTT images, the DWI lesion volume in these patients was 1 and 2 ml. Conclusion: AccASL could identify a perfusion deficit in more than 75% of patients with a perfusion deficit on the MTT maps. Lesions on accASL images were closer in volume to those seen on DWI, suggesting a more specific measure of ischemia that is less influenced by delays due to proximal occlusion or stenosis. Future work will investigate the relation between accASL perfusion deficit and final infarct.

Insight into the labeling mechanism of acceleration selective arterial spin labeling

ObjectivesAcceleration selective arterial spin labeling (AccASL) is a spatially non-selective labeling technique, used in traditional ASL methods, which labels spins based on their flow acceleration rather than spatial localization. The exact origin of the AccASL signal within the vasculature is not completely understood. To obtain more insight into this, the acceleration selective module was performed followed by a velocity selective module, which is used in velocity selective arterial spin labeling (VS-ASL).Materials and methodsNine healthy volunteers were scanned with various combinations of the control and label conditions in both the acceleration and velocity selective module. The cut-off acceleration (0.59 m/s2) or velocity (2 cm/s) was kept constant in one module, while it was varied over a large range in the other module. With the right subtractions this resulted in AccASL, VS-ASL, combined AccASL and VS-ASL signal, and signal from one module with crushing from the other.ResultsThe label created with AccASL has an overlap of approximately 50% in the vascular region with VS-ASL, but also originates from smaller vessels closer to the capillaries.ConclusionAccASL is able to label spins both in the macro- and meso-vasculature, as well as in the microvasculature.

Acceleration-selective arterial spin labeling for intracranial MR angiography with improved visualization of cortical arteries and suppression of cortical veins.

A new approach for intracranial MR angiography (MRA) is introduced, using acceleration-selective arterial spin labeling (AccASL). The aim of this study was to investigate the arterial visualization and venous suppression using AccASL. Intracranial MRA images obtained by AccASL and time-of-flight (TOF) were compared in seven healthy volunteers and one patient with occlusion of the terminal portion of the left internal carotid artery. The volunteer images were assessed by measuring the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) between the middle cerebral artery (MCA) and white matter (WM) and between the confluence of sinuses and WM. Additionally, visualized peripheral arteries were counted and qualitative scoring of the MCA visualization and vein signal contamination was conducted. The CNR at the M4 branch and the number of visualized arteries was significantly higher using AccASL compared with that in TOF (P < 0.05). In the qualitative comparison, the score for artery visualization was higher using AccASL (P < 0.05), while minimizing signal contamination by cortical veins. Additionally, in patient examination, the collateral flow visualization was better with AccASL. AccASL enables better efficiency for visualizing peripheral arteries compared with TOF, while suppressing cortical vein signal. Magn Reson Med 77:1996-2004, 2017. © 2016 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Acceleration‐selective arterial spin labeling

In this study, a new arterial spin labeling (ASL) method with spatially nonselective labeling is introduced, based on the acceleration of flowing spins, which is able to image brain perfusion with minimal contamination from venous signal. This method is termed acceleration-selective ASL (AccASL) and resembles velocity-selective ASL (VSASL), with the difference that AccASL is able to discriminate between arterial and venous components in a single preparation module due to the higher acceleration on the arterial side of the microvasculature, whereas VSASL cannot make this distinction unless a second labeling module is used. A difference between AccASL and VSASL is that AccASL is mainly cerebral blood volume weighted, whereas VSASL is cerebral blood flow weighted. AccASL exploits the principles of acceleration-encoded magnetic resonance angiography by using motion-sensitizing gradients in a T2 -preparation module. This method is demonstrated in healthy volunteers for a range of cutoff accelerations. Additionally, AccASL is compared with VSASL and pseudo-continuous ASL, and its feasibility in functional MRI is demonstrated. Compared with VSASL with a single labeling module, a strong and significant reduction in venous label is observed. The resulting signal-to-noise ratio is comparable to pseudo-continuous ASL and robust activation of the visual cortex is observed.