Schools of the future will involve parents, will empower principals and teachers, will emphasize early childhood education, and will strengthen curricula in mathematics, science, English, foreign languages, and the social sciences, Mr. Cavazos predicts. Most of all, schools of the future will have more sensitivity to the differing needs of an increasingly diverse population. WHEN President Ronald Reagan asked me to join his Cabinet as secretary of education, I was delighted. My involvement in elementary and secondary education had been minimal, but I knew that our public elementary and secondary schools needed revitalization and restructuring. I was especially interested in enhancing the education of minorities. This aim had been a major focus of my tenure as a medical school dean and a university president. With my appointment as secretary, I brought to the office many years of experience in medical, graduate, and undergraduate education and a sharp focus on minority education. Growing up in Texas, I received my early childhood education in two schools. One was a two-room school on a South Texas ranch, and the other was in a small town nearby. In both places, the school was a justified source of local pride. When I joined the Cabinet, I believed that the nation's future depended on what happened in the schoolhouse, and I remain convinced that there is no more important job than the education of our children. When I assumed office, I knew that the major item on my agenda as secretary would be to provide leadership at the federal level that would help improve our public elementary and secondary education system. It was obvious to me that I would have to create an alliance of people committed to enhancing education. This alliance would have to include teachers, parents, students, school administrators, school board members, governors, and businesspeople. I believed then and I still believe that education is the source that nurtures the freedoms we enjoy in all aspects of our lives. The idea of universal education, which spread across America in the 19th century, thanks to the pioneering efforts of Horace Mann, was critical for the building of a prosperous and democratic nation. As secretary I sought to have all Americans renew their commitment to universal education. I wanted to ensure that all people -- regardless of race, gender, disabilities, or economic circumstances -- would have access to schools of excellence. During my tenure as secretary, I found that many educators, parents, employers, and teachers were aware of the need to enhance our school systems, and they worked diligently to improve the system. The need for this renewal had long been acknowledged. In 1983, under the leadership of Secretary Terrel Bell, the department published A Nation at Risk, which urged us to find ways to improve education. Still, up to the time of my appointment, the nation had failed to undertake the thorough restructuring needed to reverse our educational decline. By restructuring, I mean fundamental, radical changes in the organization of our schools. The ultimate purpose of restructuring is to create schools that continuously change and adapt in response to the needs of both students and society. To me, academic restructuring is not an end but a process, leading to constant renewal of both schools and teaching. The precise nature of these changes must depend on local conditions and circumstances, but they have only one purpose: to allow parents, teachers, and administrators to respond to the needs of students rather than to the requirements of a bureaucracy. Prior to my appointment, many efforts had been made to improve education, but we seemed to have just tinkered around the margins of real reform. Significant improvement of students' performance had not occurred. Perhaps my major achievement as secretary and the principal issue that confronted me during my tenure was the establishment of the national education performance goals. …