Reviewed by: Ghost of Colonies Past and Present: Spanish Imperialism in the Fiction of Benito Pérez Galdós by Mary L. Coffey Ana Mateos MARY L. COFFEY. Ghost of Colonies Past and Present: Spanish Imperialism in the Fiction of Benito Pérez Galdós. Liverpool, Liverpool University Press, 2020. 344 pp. In Ghosts of Colonies Past and Present, Mary L. Coffey contests the prevailing view that Spain systematically ignored the independence movements of its colonies in continental America until finally forced to acknowledge its diminished role in the new political configuration brought about by the independence of the last remaining overseas territories in 1898. Coffey attributes this opinion in large part to two "dominant explanatory paradigms" in historical studies (23). First, modern academic historiography, which first developed in France and Great Britain, privileged their own imperial histories, and neglected Spain's unique history, something still felt in the so-called imperial turn in today's academic scholarship. Second, guided by traditional historiographical paradigms, scholars have been looking for the wrong types of collective responses to the independence movements and thus have, for the most part, failed to appreciate a collective trauma in the works of nineteenth-century Spain's leading author, Benito Pérez Galdós, one that is of a completely different nature from the "disaster" of 1898 and which "historians might not always recognize" (22). Why should Galdós hold the key to Spain's engagement with its colonial past? Coffey's answer is clear: Galdós is significant not only as a fiction writer but also because his novels played an extraordinarily influential role in constructing modern Spain's national identity. The book offers an impressive and unprecedented journey through Galdós's enormous fictional output, which exhibits the writer's "lifelong engagement with Spain's imperial past" (4), and more specifically, the different forms that this engagement took on, depending on how tumultuous political changes variously affected Galdós's perceptions of the past. Particular attention is given to the writer's early and less studied works since, according to the author, they provide the fundamental framework in which his later fiction addressed Spain's imperial past and present. The six main chapters of the book alternate between general presentations, generally of better-known novels––occasionally, as with the novelas contemporáneas, focusing primarily on previous scholarly interpretations––and original close readings, generally of lesser studied novels. The Introduction, "Managing the Loss of Empire", analyzes the historical complexities and peculiarities of Spain's experience of the "imperial losses" of the 1820s, which not only made Spain the first European power to face the loss of its empire but also, as Coffey maintains, had an intense emotional effect that was felt in a psychologically idiosyncratic way. Coffey supports this central thesis, which draws on a Freudian framework, by appealing to two factors. First, Spaniards largely regarded Americans as part of the same Spanish family and implicitly viewed the wars of independence as "family quarrels." As in family quarrels, the early imperial losses were felt as incredibly profound, but also could not be immediately acknowledged or openly discussed (22). Thus, Coffey's main methodological approach is to look beyond the more immediate national discourse at the surface, on which scholars have traditionally focused, to an underlying imperial theme coded in allegories and metaphors and sometimes [End Page 239] interwoven with the stories of the secondary characters, less visible to the reader. In this coded language that says one thing on the surface but has another meaning at a deeper layer, Galdós found a way of dealing with a pain that was too profound to be directly confronted and accepted. Second, Spaniards did not experience the independence of the American territories immediately, mostly due to the censorship imposed by Fernando VII on news coming from overseas during the 1820s. Spain became aware of those changes after 1833, nine years after the 1824 battle of Ayacucho (37). This belated awareness softened the initial emotional impact of the imperial loss but enabled a decades-long awakening to a new political reality. It is not surprising, then, that fifty years after the Spanish defeat in Ayacucho, Galdós is still...
Read full abstract