Academic Detailing Program Research Articles

Surfacing the causal assumptions and active ingredients of healthcare quality improvement interventions: An application to primary care opioid prescribing.

Efforts to maximize the impact of healthcare improvement interventions are hampered when intervention components are not well defined or described, precluding the ability to understand how and why interventions are expected to work. We partnered with two organizations delivering province-wide quality improvement interventions to establish how they envisaged their interventions lead to change (their underlying causal assumptions) and to identify active ingredients (behavior change techniques [BCTs]). The interventions assessed were an audit and feedback report and an academic detailing program. Both focused on supporting safer opioid prescribing in primary care in Ontario, Canada. Data collection involved semi-structured interviews with intervention developers (n = 8) and a content analysis of intervention documents. Analyses unpacked and articulated how the interventions were intended to achieve change and how this was operationalized. Developers anticipated that the feedback report would provide physicians with a clear understanding of their own prescribing patterns in comparison to others. In the feedback report, we found an emphasis on BCTs consistent with that assumption (feedback on behavior; social comparison). The detailing was designed to provide tailored support to enable physicians to overcome barriers to change and to gradually enact specific practice changes for patients based on improved communication. In the detailing materials, we found an emphasis on instructions on how to perform the behavior, for a range of behaviors (e.g., tapering opioids, treating opioid use disorder). The materials were supplemented by detailer-enacted BCTs (e.g., social support [practical]; goal setting [behavior]; review behavioral goal[s]). The interventions included a small range of BCTs addressing various clinical behaviors. This work provides a methodological example of how to apply a behavioral lens to surface the active ingredients, target clinical behaviors, and causal assumptions of existing large-scale improvement interventions that could be applied in other contexts to optimize effectiveness and facilitate scale and spread.

Can Educational Outreach Improve Experts’ Decision Making? Evidence from a National Opioid Academic Detailing Program

Can Educational Outreach Improve Experts’ Decision Making? Evidence from a National Opioid Academic Detailing Program

Evaluation of an Academic Detailing Program to Improve Blood Pressure Measurement and Hypertension Treatment in Urban Community Health Centers.

Hypertension is estimated at a prevalence of 30 to 50% in the United States. Only 54% of patients with hypertension have their condition adequately controlled. This study aimed to use academic detailing (AD) to improve practice team knowledge and confidence in blood pressure (BP) management, specifically in low-income, underresourced patient populations. AD was developed for five practices that care for high percentages of Medicaid-eligible patients. A needs assessment was administered to each site's practice champion to determine high-yield AD sessions for their team. Presession and postsession evaluations were completed by practice team members. Fifty providers and eight staff member participants completed evaluations over nine sessions for two AD topics at four practice sites. Statistical significance was found for several items within sessions including accurately choosing cuff sizes and identifying barriers to home BP monitoring. AD is a potentially financially efficient model to improve knowledge and confidence in hypertension care at the practice level. Tailoring session content to specific needs of a practice site, along with an identified practice champion, facilitated implementation of the program. This replicable model is one way to deliver evidence-based information to those who serve Medicaid-eligible patients.

Comparison of virtual to in-person academic detailing on naloxone prescribing rates at three U.S. Veterans Health Administration regional networks

IntroductionAcademic detailing, an educational outreach that promotes evidence-based practices to improve the quality of care for patients, has primarily been delivered using one-on-one in-person interactions. In 2018, the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Pharmacy Benefits Management implemented a pilot virtual academic detailing program to increase naloxone prescribing among veterans at risk for opioid overdose or death. The aim of this evaluation was to compare virtual and in-person academic detailing on naloxone prescribing rates at VA. MethodsA retrospective quasi-experimental pretest-posttest non-equivalent groups design was used to compare virtual academic detailing and in-person academic detailing on naloxone prescribing rates 12 months before and after providers received a naloxone-specific encounter at three VA regional networks between January 1, 2018 to May 31, 2020. Subgroup analysis was performed on rural providers. Generalized estimating equation models were constructed to compare the difference in naloxone prescribing rates before and after receiving virtual or in-person academic detailing controlling for provider-level characteristics. ResultsProviders who received virtual (N = 67) or in-person (N = 186) academic detailing had significant increases in naloxone prescribing, but the differences in the naloxone rates between the groups were not statistically significant (difference in changes in naloxone rates=+0.63; 95% CI: −2.23, 3.48). Similar findings were reported for rural providers. DiscussionProviders who received naloxone-related in-person or virtual academic detailing had increased naloxone prescribing rates; however, there were no differences between the two types of modalities. Virtual academic detailing is a viable alternative for delivering academic detailing and allows academic detailers to expand their reach to rural providers.

ESCV/PASCV Membership

Academic detailing, an educational outreach that promotes evidence-based practices to improve the quality of care for patients, has primarily been delivered using one-on-one in-person interactions. In 2018, the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Pharmacy Benefits Management implemented a pilot virtual academic detailing program to increase naloxone prescribing among veterans at risk for opioid overdose or death. The aim of this evaluation was to compare virtual and in-person academic detailing on naloxone prescribing rates at VA.A retrospective quasi-experimental pretest-posttest non-equivalent groups design was used to compare virtual academic detailing and in-person academic detailing on naloxone prescribing rates 12 months before and after providers received a naloxone-specific encounter at three VA regional networks between January 1, 2018 to May 31, 2020. Subgroup analysis was performed on rural providers. Generalized estimating equation models were constructed to compare the difference in naloxone prescribing rates before and after receiving virtual or in-person academic detailing controlling for provider-level characteristics.Providers who received virtual (N = 67) or in-person (N = 186) academic detailing had significant increases in naloxone prescribing, but the differences in the naloxone rates between the groups were not statistically significant (difference in changes in naloxone rates=+0.63; 95% CI: −2.23, 3.48). Similar findings were reported for rural providers.Providers who received naloxone-related in-person or virtual academic detailing had increased naloxone prescribing rates; however, there were no differences between the two types of modalities. Virtual academic detailing is a viable alternative for delivering academic detailing and allows academic detailers to expand their reach to rural providers.

Implementation of a pharmacy-led virtual academic detailing program at the US Veterans Health Administration.

To provide a summary of the implementation of a virtual academic detailing pilot program at the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). In September 2018, VA Pharmacy Benefits Management implemented a virtual academic detailing ("e-Detailing") pilot program across 3 regional networks. Academic detailing involves multifaceted collaborative outreach delivered by trained healthcare clinicians to other clinicians using targeted educational interventions that improve clinical decision-making. Across VA, academic detailing programs are primarily staffed by specially trained clinical pharmacist specialists. Implementation began with an in-person meeting to train academic detailers on using the virtual academic detailing platform (VA Video Connect) and virtual soft skills, which was followed by regular facilitation meetings to address issues and share experiences. During e-Detailing program implementation, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) emerged, prompting the US Department of Health and Human Services to declare a public health emergency. VA followed with restrictions on nonessential travel for all employees, thus hampering in-person academic detailing activities. Fortunately, e-Detailing provided an alternative channel for academic detailers across VA to continue delivering critical outreach to providers during the pandemic. Qualitative assessment of academic detailers' and providers' perceptions on e-Detailing highlighted the need for local leadership support for e-Detailing and telehealth, the efficiency of virtual compared to in-person visits, and potential time savings resulting from avoidance of long commutes. The timing of e-Detailing implementation during the COVID-19 pandemic illustrates the need and potential for a virtual platform to deliver timely provider outreach.

Implementation of academic detailing for pharmacists on opioid use disorder and harm reduction

BackgroundThe United States is experiencing an opioid crisis, substantially worsened by the pandemic. Pharmacists play a critical role in expanding access to care through harm reduction efforts and medications to treat opioid use disorder (mOUD), yet lack necessary education and resources. Academic detailing is a one-on-one technique, which can effectively address educational gaps. ObjectiveThe purpose was to assess needs and equip pharmacy staff to address the health of people with substance use disorders (SUD). Practice descriptionCommunity pharmacists provide ongoing care for patients with SUD. Practice innovationBased on needs’ assessment findings, an academic detailing program was designed to provide education and resources for community pharmacies. The project sought to assess current practice and needs and address pharmacists' skills in managing patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) and/or at risk for overdose (OD). Visits were scheduled in high-risk regions. Coaching and materials were provided. Evaluation methodsDetailers completed visits reports. Discrete variables were reported using descriptive statistics. Associations between discrete variables were detected with Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test. ResultsDetailers visited 136 pharmacies. Most stocked naloxone (86.8%), mOUD (94.9%) and would sell syringes (64%) per state law. Fifty-seven percent of pharmacies provided all of these services. However, additional education and resources were needed. Only 27.9% had naloxone signage and/or handouts; 22.1% had supplemental materials; and 25% had referral information. When asked to explain barriers, frequently cited themes included providing resources/help, financial issues, stigma, and transportation. ConclusionPharmacists routinely care for patients at risk for OD and diagnosed with OUD. Academic detailing is a well-received strategy to disseminate education and materials, while gathering information about pharmacist needs and barriers. However, there remains room for expansion of services and opportunities for improved care. Further efforts should incorporate ongoing training and access to materials with visual cues, as well as referral and cost savings information.

Secondary effects of an opioid-focused academic detailing program on non-opioid controlled substance prescribing in primary care

Background: Educational outreach programs that focus on safe opioid prescribing and awareness of state prescription monitoring programs may modify clinicians’ prescribing behavior. The objective of this study was to evaluate the secondary effects of an opioid-focused academic detailing (AD) program on non-opioid controlled substance prescribing in primary care. Methods: A quasi-experimental pre-post study of primary care clinicians exposed and unexposed to the AD program was conducted using data from the Illinois Prescription Monitoring Program from December 2017 to February 2019. Outcomes were mean monthly prescriptions for benzodiazepines (BZD), non-BZD sedative-hypnotics, and carisoprodol, per clinician. A difference-in-differences (DID) approach utilizing repeated-measures mixed-effects linear regression models was used to compare changes in outcomes six-months before and after the program. Results: Mean monthly BZD prescriptions declined in both groups of clinicians (AD-exposed n = 151; controls n = 399) after implementation of the AD program. Although the mean monthly number of BZD prescriptions decreased in both groups after the AD program, BZD prescribing in the AD-exposed group declined at a slower rate following the AD program (DID = 0.73; 95% CI: 0.14, 1.31). The AD-exposed group had a 0.06 (95% CI: −0.11, −0.01) lower rate of mean monthly carisoprodol prescriptions compared to the control group following the AD program. There was no change in the rate of mean monthly non-BZD sedative-hypnotic prescriptions between the two groups. Conclusions: The higher relative rate of BZD prescribing in the AD-exposed group compared to the control group following the AD program may be reflective of an unintended consequence of opioid-focused AD programs as clinicians learn to be cautious about opioid prescribing. Our findings may suggest the need for incorporation of targeted education on appropriate BZD prescribing into opioid-focused AD programs as a featured component. These findings warrant further consideration and investigation before large-scale implementation of opioid-focused educational outreach programs.

Impact of Implementing an Academic Detailing Program on Opioid-Benzodiazepine Co-Prescribing Trends at the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.

To assess the process and outcomes of academic detailing to enhance the Opioid Safety Initiative and the Psychotropic Drug Safety Initiative to reduce co-prescribing of opioid-benzodiazepine combinations in veterans. A retrospective cohort design was conducted to evaluate the impact of implementing an academic detailing program on opioid-benzodiazepine co-prescribing between October 2014 through March 2019 at the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). The primary outcome was the monthly prevalence of veterans (number per 1,000 population) who were co-prescribed opioid-benzodiazepine combination. Process measure was evaluated using implementation reach (proportion of providers who received academic detailing). Station-level analysis was performed using a linear fixed effects regression model to evaluate the rate of change in the prevalence of veterans co-prescribed opioid-benzodiazepine. Altogether 130 VA stations was included for analysis; 119 stations implemented opioid-related or benzodiazepine-related academic detailing, and 11 stations did not. Stations that had implemented academic detailing had a 33% greater monthly reduction on the opioid-benzodiazepine co-prescribing prevalence compared to stations that did not implement academic detailing (P = .036). In the linear fixed effects regression model, stations that were expected to have 100% of providers exposed to academic detailing were statistically associated with a greater decrease in the monthly prevalence of Veterans co-prescribed opioid-benzodiazepine by 4.9 veterans per 1,000 population (P < .001) compared to stations with 0% of providers exposed to academic detailing. Stations that implemented academic detailing and had a higher proportion of providers who were exposed to opioid- or benzodiazepine-related academic detailing had a significant decrease in the monthly prevalence of Veterans co-prescribed opioid-benzodiazepine combinations.

Academic detailing with ambulatory pharmacists to support naloxone counseling

BackgroundPharmacists are critical to public health in supporting safe use of prescription opioids by ensuring that all patients are offered and counseled on naloxone. Academic detailing may be an effective educational outreach strategy for improving pharmacists’ knowledge and behavior related to naloxone. ObjectiveTo describe an academic detailing program to pharmacists on the topic of counseling and promoting naloxone to patients. MethodsPharmacists were recruited by convenience sampling. Three pharmacists who were experienced with academic detailing techniques provided the education. Survey data were collected to evaluate the program. ResultsThirty-three pharmacists participated, including 16 sessions that were delivered virtually. The pharmacists worked in a variety of ambulatory settings, including chain or corporate-owned pharmacies (58%), hospital-owned specialty pharmacies (15%), hospital-owned community pharmacies (15%), and independently owned or other pharmacies (12%). Twenty-eight pharmacists (85%) completed an immediate post-session evaluation survey. Twenty-seven pharmacists (96%) indicated they felt the information presented will impact their practice or patient care. Eleven pharmacists (33%) completed a second post-session survey, self-reporting improvements related to counseling patients about naloxone. Conclusion: Participating in academic detailing supports community pharmacists’ providing patient counseling about naloxone. Further study, particularly related to virtual academic detailing, is necessary to understand the full potential of academic detailing to pharmacists.

Feasibility and acceptability of virtual academic detailing on opioid prescribing

IntroductionSocial distancing requirements during COVID-19 pose a challenge to conducting traditional academic detailing, which typically involves in-person peer education visits to improve patient outcomes. The main alternative is to conduct virtual academic detailing delivered through web-based technology, but this approach is fraught with many challenges. This study aimed to examine the feasibility and acceptability of a virtual academic detailing program implemented among health care providers. MethodsThe academic detailing program focused on appropriate opioid prescribing and chronic non-cancer pain management among a sample of providers. An initial in-person visit was followed by a virtual visit up to 8 weeks later. Videoconferencing was used to conduct the virtual visit with telephone as a backup. Feasibility was assessed whether the virtual visits could happen, and acceptability was assessed by provider satisfaction. Validated measures of Provider Satisfaction with Academic Detailing (PSAD) and Detailer Assessment of Visit Effectiveness (DAVE) with a 5-point Likert-type scale were used. Higher scores corresponded to higher satisfaction and greater perceived effectiveness. Non-parametric and parametric statistical tests were used to compare instrument summary scores across visits and between groups. Pairwise analyses across visits only included instrument responses for providers who participated in both visits and completed both surveys in their entirety. ResultsThere were 127 (90 %) initial in-person visits completed out of 141 visits scheduled, with a survey response rate of 96 %. Out of 120 virtual follow-up visits scheduled, 92 (77 %) were conducted, and 56 surveys (61 %) were collected. There was a high level of satisfaction with the initial and follow up virtual academic detailing visits, though, among providers who participated in both visits and had completed surveys (n = 50), initial visits had slightly higher scores (mean difference = −2.94 [95 % Confidence intervals: −4.38, −1.50], p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in detailer perception across the two visits as seen in the scale summary score (0.05 [−0.56, 0.66], p = 0.86) and two individually reported items related to feasibility (0.07 [−0.29, 0.42], p = 0.72) and conversation (−0.05 [−0.28, 0.17], p = 0.63). Forty-one (44.6 %) virtual visits were conducted using WebEx, where video and screen sharing of visit content was possible, while the remaining 51 (55.4 %) were conducted using a telephone. There was no significant difference in provider satisfaction between WebEx vs. telephone visits (-1.47 [-4.99, 2.05], p = 0.82). Provider satisfaction was also not impacted by any technical difficulties as reported by the detailer (-0.04 [-3.30, 3.38], p = 0.98). ConclusionThe results slightly favor in-person visits and suggest that virtual detailing visits need to incorporate strategies that minimize technical difficulties and prevent participants from defaulting to less favorable technology. Future research opportunities include evaluating the effectiveness of a virtual versus in-person delivery of AD program on outcomes such as providers’ opioid prescribing behavior.

PP406 Academic Detailing For Judges: Concepts Of Evidence-Based Medicine And Health Policies Adopted In Brazil

IntroductionThe Brazilian health system has not been able to enforce the constitutional Right to Health for the entire population, leaving litigation as the last alternative for the fulfillment of the right. In order to harmonize and underpin the decision making of federal judges, an Academic Detailing (AD) program with concepts of evidence-based medicine and health policies for federal judges will be conducted nationwide in Brazil. AD is a strategy to provide information, combining an interactive outreach approach with the best evidence. This study reports the method used to define key messages to be used during visits.MethodsGovernment, federal judges and academy representatives were invited to a workshop on health litigation in Brazil. They were divided into six groups to discuss five hypothetical scenarios. In each scenario, groups listed two possible key messages to disseminate during AD, addressing the legal, scientific, economic or ethical dimensions. After the definition, a vote was taken, according to the importance that each participant attributed to them (1 to 10), and then a score was generated.ResultsOf the thirty-one participants, five were from the judiciary, three prosecutors, one health insurance representative, nine managers and thirteen from the academy. From the case study presented, fifty-five key messages were suggested. After removing duplicates, twenty-five were selected to assign importance values by each participant. The key messages were sorted from highest to lowest score, the most important being “Explain what evidence-based medicine means and what scientific evidence means”.ConclusionsKnowledge of theoretical concepts of evidence-based medicine, health policies and the technology incorporation process seem to be of fundamental importance to federal judges. This information will serve as a basis for decision making regarding litigious proceedings involving the constitutional Right to Health in Brazil. From the selected key messages, bulletins to the academic detailing program to federal judges shall be produced.

Academic detailing program for rheumatoid arthritis: a contribution to Brazilian public health system sustainability

Abstract Objectives In Brazil, specialty medicines for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment are provided by the national health system (NHS) according to mandatory protocols. Knowing the rules for prescription of these biological agents is crucial to ensuring patient access to treatment. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of an academic detailing strategy to promote the quality use of the medicines available in NHS among prescribers. Methods Forty-three specialists and general practitioners were visited by researchers to perform an academic detailing of the Clinical Protocols and Therapeutic Guidelines (PCDT) for RA adopted by NHS. After the visits, a survey was performed with prescribers to measure their perception in terms of satisfaction and information reliability with the academic visits. At the end, we perform a cost analysis to permit comparisons of this strategy with other educational activities. Key findings From 43 physicians that were visited, 28 responded to the telephone survey. Of these, 68% were very satisfied with the visit, 50% rated the content of the visit relevant to their practice, 64.3% agreed the duration of the visit did not affect their work, 60.7% agreed the distributed material would be useful for their professional practice, and 57.1% agreed that the visits added to their knowledge. A total of USDPPP 162.96 per prescriber (USDPPP 7,007.20, BRL14,185.00) were spent on the program. Conclusion The prescribers visited represent a large number of deferrals for the Specialized Component of Pharmaceutical Care (CEAF) drug applications. Therefore, the total amount spent on the implementation of this program and its potential for improving access to these medicines has the possibility to have a positive impact on the targeting of public expenditures and avoiding litigation against NHS. Academic detailing has the capability to become an effective strategy for PCDT dissemination and implementation.

Providers' perceptions on barriers and facilitators to prescribing naloxone for patients at risk for opioid overdose after implementation of a national academic detailing program: A qualitative assessment.

Academic detailing is an educational outreach program that aligns providers' prescribing with evidence-based practice. The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Opioid Overdose Education and Naloxone Distribution (OEND) Program partnered with the VA Pharmacy Benefits Management National Academic Detailing Service to deliver naloxone education to providers who cared for patients at risk of opioid overdose. In this pilot study, we interviewed providers' who received academic detailing to capture their perceptions of facilitators and barriers to prescribing naloxone. To identify providers' perceptions of facilitators and barriers to prescribing naloxone for patients at risk for opioid overdose after implementation of a national academic detailing program. This was a hybrid inductive-deductive qualitative pilot using semi-structured interviews with VA providers to explore constructs associated with facilitators and barriers to prescribing take-home naloxone to patients at risk for opioid overdose from August 2017 to April 2018. Eleven participants were interviewed, six physicians, three clinical psychiatric pharmacists, and two nurse practitioners. Participants identified patient-level barriers (social stigma and lack of homeless patient support), poor data integration, and burden of data validation as barriers to prescribing naloxone. However, they also identified patient lists, repeat visits, and face-to-face/one-on-one video conferencing visits as important facilitators for naloxone prescribing. Academic detailing will need to address issues of social stigma regarding naloxone, educate providers about existing support systems for homeless veterans, and develop tools for data integration to improve naloxone access for veterans at risk for an opioid overdose.

Pharmacist-led academic detailing improves statin therapy prescribing for Malaysian patients with type 2 diabetes: Quasi-experimental design.

ObjectivePrevious reports have highlighted the suboptimal utilization and prescription of statin therapy among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in the Malaysian clinical practice. This study aims to test the impact of a pharmacist-led academic detailing program on improving the overall statin therapy prescribing in Malaysian hospital and primary care settings.MethodsAs a quasi-experimental design with a control group and pre-tests., we examined 1,598 medical records of T2DM subjects in six healthcare facilities in the state of Pahang, Malaysia. In all study sites, there was a pre and post-intervention assessment of the percentage of appropriate statin therapy prescribing that complied with the clinical guidelines with no potential safety issues. The intervention was an academic detailing program offered to the health care providers in three study sites, while the other three sites served as the control group. A comparison of the overall percentage of appropriate statin therapy prescribing before and after the academic detailing was performed in all intervention and control sites.ResultsOverall, 797 medical records were examined in the pre-intervention phase, and 801 records were evaluated in the post-intervention phase. The academic detailing program was associated with a statistically significant difference in the proportion of appropriate statin therapy prescribing between the post-intervention phase compared to the pre-intervention phase (n = 246, 61.7% versus n = 188, 47.1%), p = 0.001. Whereas, the appropriate statin therapy prescribing in the control study sites experienced a modest change from 53.8% (214/398) to 56.7% (228/402), p = 0.220. The academic detailing showed significant increases in the proportions of appropriate statin therapy prescribing in both hospital and primary care settings.ConclusionsThe academic detailing program was found to be significantly associated with a positive impact on the overall statin therapy prescribing among patients with T2DM in Malaysian hospital and primary care settings.

Comparison of rapid vs in-depth qualitative analytic methods from a process evaluation of academic detailing in the Veterans Health Administration

BackgroundIt is challenging to conduct and quickly disseminate findings from in-depth qualitative analyses, which can impede timely implementation of interventions because of its time-consuming methods. To better understand tradeoffs between the need for actionable results and scientific rigor, we present our method for conducting a framework-guided rapid analysis (RA) and a comparison of these findings to an in-depth analysis of interview transcripts.MethodsSet within the context of an evaluation of a successful academic detailing (AD) program for opioid prescribing in the Veterans Health Administration, we developed interview guides informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and interviewed 10 academic detailers (clinical pharmacists) and 20 primary care providers to elicit detail about successful features of the program. For the RA, verbatim transcripts were summarized using a structured template (based on CFIR); summaries were subsequently consolidated into matrices by participant type to identify aspects of the program that worked well and ways to facilitate implementation elsewhere. For comparison purposes, we later conducted an in-depth analysis of the transcripts. We described our RA approach and qualitatively compared the RA and deductive in-depth analysis with respect to consistency of themes and resource intensity.ResultsIntegrating the CFIR throughout the RA and in-depth analysis was helpful for providing structure and consistency across both analyses. Findings from the two analyses were consistent. The most frequently coded constructs from the in-depth analysis aligned well with themes from the RA, and the latter methods were sufficient and appropriate for addressing the primary evaluation goals. Our approach to RA was less resource-intensive than the in-depth analysis, allowing for timely dissemination of findings to our operations partner that could be integrated into ongoing implementation.ConclusionsIn-depth analyses can be resource-intensive. If consistent with project needs (e.g., to quickly produce information to inform ongoing implementation or to comply with a policy mandate), it is reasonable to consider using RA, especially when faced with resource constraints. Our RA provided valid findings in a short timeframe, enabling identification of actionable suggestions for our operations partner.

The Effect of Pharmacy-Led, Small-Group Academic Detailing on Prescribing Patterns in an Ambulatory Care Clinic.

Background: While academic detailing seems to be the most promising intervention to improve prescribing patterns, implementation could be challenging for small community practices. Objective: A pharmacy-led, interactive, and tailored small-group academic detailing in a federally qualified health center is described. The primary objective of the study was to determine if the small-group academic detailing improved the prescribing patterns of the medical providers for select disease states: type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), hyperlipidemia (HLD), and essential hypertension (HTN). Methods: Prescribing patterns in a federally qualified health center were examined in relation to small-group academic detailing sessions from April 2010 to March 2015. The markers for improvement were the increase in utilizing metformin and statins in patients diagnosed with T2DM and HLD, respectively, and the reduction of β-blocker use in patients diagnosed with essential HTN. Changes in prescribing patterns were evaluated using Pearson's χ2 and Fisher's exact tests. Results: The average number of active, adult patients with T2DM, HLD, and essential HTN was 839, 1768, and 2547, respectively. Utilization of metformin in T2DM increased from 5.5% at baseline to 37.7%, statin utilization in HLD increased from 77.1% to 86.9%, and β-blocker use in HTN decreased from 17.9% to 13.8% (P < .005). Conclusions: A pharmacy-led, small-group academic detailing program improved and maintained appropriate prescribing patterns in an underserved community practice. This study serves as a successful pilot emphasizing the pharmacist's role as an educator and a resource to medical providers regarding appropriate medication use.

A pharmacist-driven academic detailing program to increase adult pneumococcal vaccination

ObjectivesTo describe our statewide, pharmacist-led education campaign to increase knowledge and awareness of pneumococcal immunization recommendations. SettingImmunization providers and residents in the state of Rhode Island. Practice descriptionA clinical pathway (i.e., decision-support tool) was developed to educate health professionals about appropriate indications, administration schedules, and frequently asked questions for the 2 different adult pneumococcal vaccines. Academic detailing and distribution of the clinical pathway to health professionals was conducted across Rhode Island. Community outreach activities included radio ads as well as distribution of patient handouts and wallet cards at community events. Practice innovationTo our knowledge, this was the first statewide, pharmacist-driven academic detailing and community outreach campaign to promote adult pneumococcal vaccination. EvaluationAcademically detailed immunization providers received a 6-question survey. Pneumococcal disease rate differences between the study periods were evaluated with the use of Fisher exact tests, whereas changes in vaccination were assessed with the use of chi-square tests. ResultsFrom November 2013 through July 2015, our academic detailers visited and distributed our vaccination pathway materials to more than 400 practice sites across Rhode Island, including 68% of community pharmacies and all adult acute care hospitals. Of the 413 surveys completed, 92% of respondents agreed that their knowledge of the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, 13-valent and pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine, 23-valent had improved. Pneumococcal vaccination increased significantly (absolute difference 3.9%, percentage change in proportion 5.4%; P = 0.01), and pneumococcal disease decreased significantly between the preintervention and intervention periods (−2.74/10,000 discharges [95% CI −5.15 to −0.32], P = 0.02). Invasive pneumococcal disease decreased by 21 cases per 1,000,000 population per year between the preintervention and postintervention periods (−42.25 to 0.14, P = 0.05). ConclusionOur statewide, pharmacist-driven pneumococcal vaccination educational outreach program resulted in favorable provider feedback relative to knowledge change and perceptions. Vaccination increased and pneumococcal disease decreased during the study period.

Multifaceted academic detailing program to increase pharmacotherapy for alcohol use disorder: interrupted time series evaluation of effectiveness.

BackgroundActive consideration of effective medications to treat alcohol use disorder (AUD) is a consensus standard of care, yet knowledge and use of these medications are very low across diverse settings. This study evaluated the overall effectiveness a multifaceted academic detailing program to address this persistent quality problem in the US Veterans Health Administration (VHA), as well as the context and process factors that explained variation in effectiveness across sites.MethodsAn interrupted time series design, analyzed with mixed-effects segmented logistic regression, was used to evaluate changes in level and rate of change in the monthly percent of patients with a clinically documented AUD who received naltrexone, acamprosate, disulfiram, or topiramate. Using data from a 20 month post-implementation period, intervention sites (n = 37) were compared to their own 16 month pre-implementation performance and separately to the rest of VHA.ResultsFrom immediately pre-intervention to the end of the observation period, the percent of patients in the intervention sites with AUD who received medication increased over 3.4 % in absolute terms and 68 % in relative terms (i.e., 4.9–8.3 %). This change was significant compared to the pre-implementation period in the intervention sites and secular trends in control sites. Sites with lower pre-implementation adoption, more person hours of detailing, but fewer people detailed, had larger immediate increases in medication receipt after implementation. The average number of detailing encounters per person was associated with steeper increases in slope over time.ConclusionsThis study found empirical support for a multifaceted quality improvement strategy aimed at increasing access to and utilization of pharmacotherapy for AUD. Future studies should focus on determining how to enhance the programs effects, especially in non-responsive locations.

Implementation of clinical guidelines in Brazil: should academic detailing be used?

Objective: The Brazilian National Health System provides high cost medicines through the Specialized Component of Pharmaceutical Assistance in accordance with adherence to agreed Clinical Guidelines. However, physician compliance to these Guidelines, as well as the barriers and facilitators related to them and the influence on the subsequent quality of care provided is unknown. Consequently, the objectives of this paper are to undertake a review of international experiences and scientific publications of a strategy to disseminate and communicate guidelines to physicians through Academic Detailing. Subsequently use the findings to develop and conduct a pilot Academic Detailing Program in Brazil targeting specialists who prescribe medicines for patients with Alzheimer’s disease, which are part of the Specialized Component of Pharmaceutical Assistance. Methods: Review international experiences and scientific publications relating to academic detailing based on a thorough review of available literature including publications known to the co-authors. Develop and monitor physician acceptance of academic detailing for patients with Alzheimer’s Disease and the impact on future prescribing. Key findings: Based on the lessons learnt from the international experience and review, coupled with the initial experiences in Brazil, we conclude that conducting academic detailing to enhance the implementation and dissemination of clinical protocols and therapeutic guidelines in Brazil is worthwhile. We will be closely monitoring the outcome of the pilot academic detailing programme as a basis for developing future programmes to further improve the quality of prescribing in Brazil. Conclusion: Findings from the experiences are encouraging. This will be further explored to provide a basis for this approach in the future.