Abutment Fracture Research Articles

Maintenance Costs, Time, and Efforts Following Implant Therapy With Fixed Restorations Over an Observation Period of 10 Years: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

To assess the costs and efforts of maintenance therapy following implant treatment with fixed restoration over an observation period of 10 years. This randomized controlled clinical trial included 64 patients who were randomly assigned to receive one of two implant systems (AST or STM) and fixed restoration. Patients were included in a regular maintenance program and were examined at loading, 1, 3, 5, 8, and 10 years. Outcome measures included technical and biological complications, time, efforts, and costs to resolve them. A total of 97 implants were placed in 64 patients (AST: 54, STM: 43). Patient recall rates at 5 and 10 years were 89% and 67%. In general, technical complications were resolved within one to two appointments (mean = 1.5), and biological complications required a mean of 1.3 appointments. The overall regular maintenance time for the period of 10 years amounted to 77 min per year. Technical complications occurred in 39.5% of the patients, with screw-loosening being the most common one (43.4% of all complications). The most time-consuming technical complication was abutment fracture (94 min ± 68), followed by screw fracture (84 min ± 38). The prevalence of peri-implant mucositis on the patient level was 30.2%, and it was 9.3% for peri-implantitis. The average annual maintenance costs amounted to 9% of the initial cost of the implant treatment over the period of 10 years. Additional regular maintenance costs and costs due to the treatment of potential complications have to be taken into consideration when placing dental implants. The majority of technical complications could be resolved within one appointment, whereas the time needed to treat biological complications varied between one and three appointments for peri-implantitis.

Mandibular Implant-Supported Overdentures Using Telescopic Crowns and Immediate Loading Protocol: A 2-Year Prospective Follow-up Study.

Implant-supported overdentures have been an effective treatment method for edentulous mandibles. However, the loading time after implant placement is still controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of implant-supported overdentures using telescopic crowns for the treatment of edentulous patients with immediate loading protocol. This study was conducted on 22 edentulous mandibular patients visiting the Department of High Technique, National Hospital of Odonto - Stomatology, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam for prosthodontic rehabilitation. Each patient received four interforaminal implants. Immediate loading protocol was applied, and Ankylos Syncone copings systems was used to connect the prosthesis and the implants. The survival rate of implants and prostheses, as the primary outcome, were evaluated at 6 months, 01 year, and 02 years post-surgery. Peri-implant tissue condition, peri-implant bone loss, and patient satisfaction were the secondary outcomes. The implant survival rate was 98.9% with 01 failed implant. The peri-implant bone loss changes after 6 months, 01 year, and 02 years were 0.07 ± 0.22 mm, 0.12 ± 0.3 mm, and 0.15 ± 0.2 mm, respectively. No gingival hyperplasia was recorded. The prosthesis survival rate was 86.4% with 1 fractured overdenture, 1 overdenture relining and 1 abutment fracture. Mandibular rehabilitation using implant-supported overdenture with telescopic crowns and immediate loading protocol showed high survival rates of both implant and prosthesis in 2-year follow-up.

Retrospective study on the clinical and radiographic outcomes of 2.8 mm diameter implants supporting fixed prostheses up to 11 years.

This study aimed to report the clinical and radiographic results of 2.8 mm two-piece narrow diameter implant (NDI) supporting fixed restorations. Clinical and radiographic data of 54 NDIs in 32 patients were retrospectively assessed after 2 to 11 (mean 8.17) years of follow-up. Clinical and radiographic measurements were taken. Survival rate, implant and prosthesis failure, pink aesthetic scores (PES), white aesthetic scores (WES), bleeding on probing (BOP), probing depth (PD), marginal bone loss (MBL), and mechanical and biological complications were evaluated. An implant failed during the follow-up period, resulting in a cumulative survival rate of 98.15% at the implant level and 96.88% in the patient. The total mean values of PES and WES for 2.8 mm NDIs were 7.09 ± 1.15 (range: 3.33-9.00) and 7.42 ± 1.03 (range: 3.67-9.33). The prevalence of sites with positive BOP was 38.14 ± 29.77%. The mean PD value was 2.46 ± 0.62 mm. The average MBL was 1.15 ± 0.74 mm (range: 0.25-4.03 mm). No implant or abutment fracture was detected. A veneer chipping was present in one patient, and a loose crown appeared in another patient. Two implants (3.7%) and two patients (6.3%) were diagnosed with peri-implantitis. Within the limitation of the study, the results indicate that the use of two-piece 2.8 mm NDI for the fixed prosthetic rehabilitation of edentulous regions with reduced interdental and/or buccal-lingual width is viable.

Seven-Year Retrospective Study on Conometric Retention for Complete Fixed Prosthesis

The aim of the present work was to evaluate retrospectively, after seven years of function, the efficacy of a conometric retention to stabilize complete prostheses (CPs) on four implants. Data from twenty-three patients with CPs supported by four implants, with at least seven years of follow up were retrieved. All the CPs were immediately fixed to the implants using a conometric retention. Outcome measures were prosthesis and implant success, biological and prosthetic complications, probing pocket depth changes, marginal bleeding, and plaque index changes. A total of 92 implants were evaluated. No fixture or abutment fractures were reported. No abutment unscrewing was reported. Four framework fractures occurred after three, four, six, and seven years of function. The overall success rate of the rehabilitation was 82.6%. Mucositis was observed in eight patients and 13 implants. No peri-implantitis was recorded. A 0.55 mm difference of PPD and 0.74 mm of MBL was recorded after seven years (p < 0.001). The present implant-supported conometric retention system proved to be effective in giving fixed retention to a CP supported by four implants. Biological complications were easily detected and treated. An adequate metal framework should be provided to the definitive restoration to avoid fractures in the long term.

Utilizing Intraoral Scanning and Computer-Aided Design/Manufacturing for Creating a New Dental Crown to Match an Existing Removable Prosthesis: A Case Report

This clinical report demonstrates the successful dental crown treatment for a 39-year-old female patient with a fractured posterior lower right second molar wearing a removable partial prosthesis and refusing to make a new one. The patient's preference for a new dental crown on her lower right second molar was respected, and an intraoral scanner (IOS) was employed to capture the fractured abutment's anatomy, which also serves as part of her removable denture. Following abutment preparation, a second IOS scan recorded the modified abutment. A temporary crown of the abutment was fabricated and secured to protect the prepared abutment. Comprehensive data, including an intraoral scan with an existing removable denture file, an intraoral scan without a removable denture, an intraoral scan of an unprepared abutment file, an intraoral scan of prepared abutment, and a digital photo of shade selection were transmitted to the dental laboratory. Utilizing computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing technology, a new dental crown compatible with the existing removable prosthesis was created. After fitting the new crown, occlusion, aesthetics, function, and attachment assessments were conducted to ensure optimal results. Subsequent follow-ups confirmed the patient's satisfaction with the functionality, aesthetics, and fit of her removable partial denture with the new dental crown.

An In Vitro Investigation of the Role of Implant Abutment Materials on the Fracture Resistance and Failure Mode of Implant-Supported Restorations.

Implant-supported restorations have gained popularity in modern dentistry, and the choice of abutment material is crucial for their long-term success. This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the fracture resistance and failure mode of implant-supported restorations using different abutment materials. Ninety standardized implant-supported restorations were included in the study. Abutments made of titanium, zirconia, and a hybrid material (titanium base with a zirconia veneer) were evaluated. Standardized abutments were fabricated, and screw-retained restorations were fabricated using a resin-based composite material. Cyclic loading was applied using a universal testing machine to simulate masticatory forces. Fracture resistance was measured in terms of the number of cycles to failure (NCF), and failure modes were analyzed. The findings indicate that zirconia abutments exhibited higher fracture resistance compared to titanium and hybrid abutments. Longer implants demonstrated higher fracture resistance, suggesting improved stability and resistance to mechanical forces. Increased loading angles resulted in decreased fracture resistance of implant-supported restorations, emphasizing the need for proper occlusal adjustment. Central loading showed higher fracture resistance than lateral and posterior loading locations. The distribution of failure modes varied among the abutment materials, with bulk prosthesis fracture being the most common in the titanium group, while abutment fracture was predominant in the zirconia and hybrid groups. This in vitro study demonstrated that the choice of abutment material significantly influenced the fracture resistance and failure mode of implant-supported restorations. Zirconia abutments exhibited the highest fracture resistance, followed by hybrid and titanium abutments. The failure mode analysis revealed different patterns of failure for each abutment material.

Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Single Implant-Supported Zirconia Crowns Following a Digital and Conventional Workflow: Four-Year Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of single posterior screw-retained monolithic implant crowns following a digital and conventional workflow and to report on the survival/complication rate after a mean 4-year follow-up. Thirty patients with a single posterior tooth missing were rehabilitated with a bone-level implant. After a healing period of ≥3 months, they were subjected to both a digital and conventional workflow to fabricate two screw-retained monolithic implant crowns. The quantitative clinical adjustments to both crowns (intrasubject comparison) and a questionnaire were recorded at try-in. Thereafter, a crown of the digital and conventional workflows was randomly inserted. At the last follow-up, the marginal bone level (MBL), peri-implant health-related parameters (bleeding on probing (BoP), plaque, pocket probing depth (PPD)), and functional implant prosthodontic score (FIPS) were assessed. Furthermore, the implant survival and success rates and technical complications were evaluated. A total of 27 patients were followed for a mean period of 4.23 ± 1.10 years. There was no significant difference between the digital and conventional workflows regarding clinical adjustments and questionnaire outcomes. More than twice as many participants recommended digital (n = 16) compared to conventional impressions (n = 7) to friends. The implant survival and success rate were 100% and 96.3%, respectively. Furthermore, two de-cementations and one fracture of the ti-base abutment occurred. There were no significant differences in BoP, plaque, and PPD metrics between the two groups. The changes in the MBL between implant crown insertion (baseline) and the last follow-up were 0.07 ± 0.19 mm and 0.34 ± 0.62 mm in the digital and conventional groups, respectively (p = 0.195). The mean overall FIPS score was 8.11 ± 1.37 (range: 5-10). The clinical and radiographic outcomes of single screw-retained monolithic implant crowns were similar between both workflows after a mean of 4 years of service. The patients did not clearly prefer an impression technique for their restoration, although they would recommend the digital impression more often to friends. Thus, decision regarding clinical workflows may be based on the patient's and/or clinician's preference.

Prosthetic Complications of Single Screw-Retained Implant-Supported Metal-Ceramic Fixed Prostheses: A Retrospective Observational Study.

To analyze prosthetic complications of single screw-retained implant-supported metal-ceramic fixed prostheses (SSIMCFPs). A total of 457 medical records of patients treated with implants at the University Dental Clinic of the European University of Valencia from 2016 to 2022 were reviewed. Of the 335 SSIMCFPs evaluated, 222 were included. The following data were collected from medical records: age, sex, prosthesis location, implant diameter, type of antagonist, date of prosthesis placement, type of prosthetic complications, and the date of the occurrence of complications. Statistical analysis was estimated at the patient level with a simple binary logistic regression and at the prosthesis level, a simple logistic regression with generalized estimating equation models (p < 0.05). A total of 222 SSIMCFPs were placed in 159 patients. The prevalence of complications was 23.3% at the patient level, equivalent to 21.6% of SSIMCFPs. A total of 48 complications were collected; screw loosening was the most frequent complication (16.2%), followed by ceramic fracture (3.1%), screw fracture (1.8%), and implant fracture (0.5%). There were no cases of abutment fracture. The mean time of the loosening of the screw was 10.5 months and ceramic fractures at 6.9 months. The factors that most influenced the occurrence of prosthetic complications were posterior position (p < 0.001), implant diameter from 3.5 to 4.8 mm (p < 0.01), and lower arch position (p < 0.05). The most frequent complication of SSIMCFP was loosening of the screw followed by ceramic fracture. The appearance of these complications usually occurred during the first year after SSIMCFP placement. Factors related to the occurrence of complications were mandibular posterior location and implant diameter from 3.5 to 4.8 mm.

Zirconia Abutment Fracture in the Anterior Region: Case Series

Zirconia Abutment Fracture in the Anterior Region: Case Series

The mechanical and clinical influences of prosthetic index structure in Morse taper implant-abutment connection: a scoping review

AimThe implant-abutment connection is a crucial factor in determining the long-term stability of dental implants. The use of a prosthetic index structure in the Morse taper implant-abutment connection has been proposed as a potential solution to improve the accuracy of this connection. This study aimed to provide a scoping review of the mechanical and clinical effects of the prosthetic index structure in the Morse taper implant-abutment connection.MethodsA systematic scoping review of articles related to "dental implants," "Morse taper," and "index" was conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Scopus databases, as well as a comprehensive literature search by two independent reviewers. Relevant articles were selected for analysis and discussion, with a specific focus on investigating the impact of prosthetic index structure on the mechanical and clinical aspects of Morse taper implant-abutment connections.ResultsFinally, a total of 16 articles that met the inclusion criteria were included for data extraction and review. In vitro studies have demonstrated that the use of a prosthetic index structure in the Morse taper implant-abutment connection can affect stress distribution, biomechanical stability, and reverse torque values, which may reduce stress within cancellous bone and help limit crestal bone resorption. However, retrospective clinical studies have shown that this structure is also associated with a higher risk of mechanical complications, such as abutment fracture and abutment screw loosening.ConclusionsTherefore, the clinical trade-off between preventing crestal bone resorption and mechanical complications must be carefully considered when selecting appropriate abutments. The findings suggest that this structure can improve the accuracy and stability of the implant-abutment connection, but its use should be carefully evaluated in clinical practice.

Evaluation of different debridement strategies for implant-abutment connections: An in vitro study

Statement of problemTechnical complications, including abutment fracture, are a clinical reality. After retrieving failed components, re-establishing a reliable implant-abutment connection is essential, but recommendations on how to clean the interface are lacking. PurposeThe purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate different clinical debridement strategies for removing titanium powder from an implant-abutment interface with regard to their efficacy and associated risk of damaging the interface. Material and methodsSpecimens (n=5) were assembled from previously cut implant halves, which were then contaminated by placing titanium powder inside the implant-abutment connection. Activated rinsing, airflow, and an ultrasound scaler, as well as combinations thereof, were then used to clean the implant-abutment connections. Both parts of each specimen were rated under a light microscope with respect to contamination and damage. In addition, abutments were placed in intact implants (n=10), which had previously been contaminated and cleaned, to record torque curves and abutment stability. Statistical analysis of ratings was based on Kruskal-Wallis tests and the Nemenyi All Pairs test with single-step P value correction, while abutment stability and torque were analyzed using analysis of variance and Tukey HSD tests (α=.05). ResultsErythritol as an abrasive medium led to significantly greater contamination than the scaler (P=.002), activated rinsing (P=.021), and airflow with sodium bicarbonate combined with either conventional (P=.002) or activated rinsing (P=.007). Greater damage was also observed with erythritol because of accumulations of the abrasive media, while scratches were seen after scaler application. Airflow using sodium bicarbonate in combination with activated rinsing showed the lowest level of damage (versus scaler P=.030). Using conventional (P=.010) or activated (P=.029) rinsing, airflow treatment led to a significant reduction in contamination. The scaler led to a significant decrease in abutment stability (P=.048), while activated rinsing and the combination of airflow and activated rinsing did not significantly affect abutment stability. Abutments placed in implants previously contaminated and cleaned required greater torque as compared with original implants (versus activated rinsing, P=.009). ConclusionsActivated rinsing constituted the best technique for cleaning implant-abutment connections. Cleaning efficiency can be enhanced with airflow using sodium bicarbonate as an abrasive medium.

Systemic observation and measurement of microgap formation in dental implant–abutment connection interface under fatigue

Abstract Today, a variety of implant designs with different attachment types are widely used in dental implant systems to eliminate connection problems. However, there are still design issues that can significantly affect the long-term success of dental implants. One of these problems is the formation of a microgap in the abutment–implant interface, which can lead to abutment screw loosening, screw fracture, and abutment fracture under masticatory loading. In this in vitro study, the effects of gingival height, dental implant diameter, and abutment type (solid, digital, and ball) on microgap formation were observed after repetitive fatigue tests using an experimental design. After the tests, the optimal design factors were determined to minimize microgap formation. According to the results of the experimental design, the abutment type was found to be the most influential parameter on microgap formation. An implant diameter of 4.1 mm, the smallest gingival height of 0.5 mm, and a digital attachment combination were identified as the optimal design parameters based on the statistical approach (R 2 = 85.3 %).

The effect of different abutment materials on peri-implant tissues-A systematic review and meta-analysis.

In patients with dental implants, what is the effect of transmucosal components made of materials other than titanium (alloys) compared to titanium (alloys) on the surrounding peri-implant tissues after at least 1 year? This systematic review included eligible randomized controlled trials identified through an electronic search (Medline, Embase and Web of Science) comparing alternative abutment materials versus titanium (alloy) abutments with a minimum follow-up of 1 year and including at least 10 patients/group. Primary outcomes were peri-implant marginal bone level (MBL) and probing depth (PD), these were evaluated based on meta-analyses. Abutment survival, biological and technical complications and aesthetic outcomes were the secondary outcomes. The risk of bias was assessed with the RoB2-tool. This review is registered in PROSPERO with the number (CRD42022376487). From 5129 titles, 580 abstracts were selected, and 111 full-text articles were screened. Finally, 12 articles could be included. Concerning the primary outcomes (MBL and PD), no differences could be seen between titanium abutment and zirconia or alumina abutments, not after 1 year (MBL: zirconia: MD = -0.24, 95% CI: -0.65 to 0.16, alumina: MD = -0.06, 95% CI: -0.29 to 0.17) (PD: zirconia: MD = -0.06, 95% CI: -0.41 to 0.30, alumina: MD = -0.29, 95% CI: -0.96 to 0.38), nor after 5 years. Additionally, no differences were found concerning the biological complications and aesthetic outcomes. The most important technical finding was abutment fracture in the ceramic group and chipping of the veneering material. Biologically, titanium and zirconia abutments seem to function equally up to 5 years after placement.

Retrieval of a fractured implant abutment using a modified cover screw removal instrument: A clinical report

Implant abutment fractures are an uncommon mechanical complication, and the removal of the abutment fragment and replacement with a new prosthesis is the best solution. However, successful retrieval of the fractured abutment fragment from the implant is challenging, and effective rescue kits are lacking. This clinical report describes the retrieval of a fractured implant abutment in a conical connection implant using a modified manufacturer-specific instrument.

Management of a Fractured Implant Abutment Screw: A Case Report

In an abutment - Implant fracture, it is generally a challenge for the clinician to remove the fractured fragments. A fractured abutment screw of a single crown or fixed dental prostheses supported by an endosseous implant is a complication. In some cases, the screw cannot be removed, and alternative solutions should be considered. This clinical report describes a fractured abutment screw prostheses and cold welded screw , which was impossible to retrieve.

Using the foundation restoration as a blueprint: An uncomplicated approach to retrofitting crowns to existing removable partial dentures using CAD-CAM technology

Removable partial dentures have been used to rehabilitate partially edentulous patients for decades. A challenging but commonly encountered procedure is retrofitting a crown to an existing removable partial denture. Several techniques have been proposed for fabricating these complex prostheses, some involving the intraoral application of polymers to the abutment tooth or making impressions of the preparation with the removable prosthesis seated. The present technique presents an approach that simplifies the design and fabrication of retrofitted crowns for fractured abutment teeth needing foundation restorations. This approach involves the implementation of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing technology to record and utilize the contours of the foundation restoration established intraorally as a blueprint for the retrofitted crown.

Reliability and Failure Mode of Ti-Base Abutments Supported by Narrow/Wide Implant Systems.

To assess the reliability and failure modes of Ti-base abutments supported by narrow and wide-diameter implant systems. Narrow (Ø3.5 × 10 mm) and wide (Ø5 × 10 mm) implant systems of two different manufacturers with internal conical connections (16°) and their respective Ti-base abutments (3.5 and 4.5 mm) were evaluated. Ti-base abutments were torqued to the implants, standardized metallic maxillary incisor crowns were cemented, and step stress accelerated life testing of eighteen assemblies per group was performed in three loading profiles: mild, moderate, and aggressive until fracture or suspension. Reliability for missions of 100,000 cycles at 100 and 150 N was calculated, and fractographic analysis was performed. For missions at 100 N for 100,000 cycles, both narrow and wide implant systems exhibited a high probability of survival (≥99%, CI: 94-100%) without significant differences. At 150 N, wide-diameter implants presented higher reliability (≥99%, CI: 99-100%) compared to narrow implants (86%, CI: 61-95%), with no significant differences among manufacturers. Failure mode predominantly involved Ti-base abutment fractures at the abutment platform. Ti-base abutments supported by narrow and wide implant systems presented high reliability for physiologic masticatory forces, whereas for high load-bearing applications, wide-diameter implants presented increased reliability. Failures were confined to abutment fractures.

Incorrect management of a broken abutment screw

&#x0D; Implant abutment screw fracture is an uncommon though challenging complication. A fractured abutment screw should be removed without damaging the threads of the screw channel to reuse the prosthesis.&#x0D; &#x0D; &#x0D; To retrieve the fractured part without severing the threads, various procedures have been proposed, such as to try to unscrew the fractured part using a strong, straight and pointed probe, or to prepare a small dent into the center of the fractured part using a small round diamond burr or a fissure burr in a counter clockwise motion. Various screw removal kits have been introduced to this aim, but with inconsistent results. &#x0D; &#x0D; &#x0D; When a physician does not manage to remove the fractured screw in either way, he/she often chooses to either replace the implant, which can be an expensive option, or abandon the implant and cover it with soft tissue, which may lead to compromised function, phonetics, or esthetics. Instead, saving the implant would great benefit patients. To this aim, the conversion of the screw chamber into a dowel space for a dowel-core and crown restoration has been proposed, thanks to the aid of laser-welded titanium for example. Instead, other techniques do not seem to have been commonly accepted. &#x0D; &#x0D; &#x0D; The aim of the present article is to present the incorrect management of a fractured abutment screw by a classic surtex post. &#x0D;

A Retrospective Clinical Evaluation Of Narrow Diameter Implant Supported Dental Prosthesis: Early Results

Background: Narrow-diameter implants are planned for specific clinical conditions as locator implants between adjacent teeth with a narrow bone width or with only a narrow area in between. They are especially advantageous when restoring narrow teeth like lateral maxillary and mandibular incisors and first premolars.&#x0D; Methods: In the period between 2018 and 2019, 21 patients were rehabilitated with implant treatment. A total of 32 implants were placed (The Straumann® Bone Level Tapered Implants, ∅ 2.9 mm). The survival rates of the implants were analyzed and prosthetic complications were evaluated.&#x0D; Results: The accumulative 36-month survival rate of the implants was 96.9%. Prosthetic complications were mainly limited to loosening occlusal screws. No implant abutment fractures, screw fractures, or porcelain chipping were observed.&#x0D; Conclusion: The results show that narrow implants provide satisfactory treatment outcomes. Narrow implants can be preferred in cases, where the dental operation area is not wide enough.&#x0D; Keywords: Narrow Diameter Implants, Fixed Dental Prosthesis, Survival Rate.

Screw-retained internal connection zirconia CAD-CAM abutments in single implant reconstructions: Results of a 1-year prospective case series study.

To evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of single-tooth implant restorations using one-piece, internally connected, screw-retained, computer-aided design and computer-aided manufactured monolithic zirconia restorations fabricated on regular diameter implants. Following a 2-stage surgical procedure, 22 implants placed in anterior and posterior areas in 21 partially edentulous patients (mean age of 55 years; 9 males/12 females) were evaluated in terms of plaque index, pocket probing depth, bleeding on probing, level of oral hygiene (OH), signs of mucositis/peri-implantitis, esthetic score (ES), gingival zenith position (GZP), papilla index score, the thickness of peri-implant gingiva, radiographic marginal bone loss, and technical complications. Implants and restorations were prospectively followed from the insertion of the restoration (baseline), up to 12-months post-loading. A 100% implant survival rate resulted after loading; one implant was lost before loading. Clinically, patients performed an adequate OH, and tissues were kept healthy. Probing depth showed a slightly lower value at baseline compared to any follow-up examination (2.26 [0.94] at baseline vs. 2.53 [0.66]mm at 12 months). ES, GZP, and the thickness of the peri-implant gingiva improved throughout the course of the study. Radiographically, average marginal bone level (MBL) was 0.40 (0.40)mm after 1-year follow-up with no differences in average MBL at all time points. Technically, after 1 year of clinical function, neither abutment fracture nor any other serious complications occurred. Hence, prosthetic reconstruction survival rate was 100%. Clinical outcomes of single-tooth implant restorations using internally connected, screw-retained, computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing monolithic zirconia abutments can be considered a reliable treatment alternative after 1-year clinical observation.