There are two components to absolute pitch (AP): Absolute pitch memory, the ability to produce or aurally recognize a familiar tone without an external reference; and absolute pitch labeling, the ability to identify the tone with a specific label (Levitin, 1994). The incidence of AP is rare, with a rate of occurrence of about 0.01% for the general population (Profita & Bidder, 1988; Takeuchi & Hulse, 1993) and about 10% to 15% for professional musicians (Baharloo, Johnston, Service, Gitschier, & Freimer, 1998). However, AP is not all-or-nothing, as many people possess some characteristics of AP (Levitin & Rogers, 2005). For example, not all who can aurally recognize a familiar tone can also produce the tone, although these abilities tend to be highly correlated (Dohn, Garza-Villarreal, Ribe, Wallentin, & Vuust, 2014; Levitin, 1999; Takeuchi & Hulse, 1993). One may possess AP for a single tone, such as the orchestral tuning pitch A (Bachem, 1937; Levitin, 1999; Parncutt & Levitin, 2001), a dial tone (Smith & Schmuckler, 2008), or a short-term reference pitch for unaccompanied solo singing (Mauch, Frieler, & Dixon, 2014). It is also possible to produce or aurally recognize the pitch level of familiar songs without reference to specific labels. This type of absolute pitch memory has been identified by different names, including pieceAP, residual AP, implicit AP, and latent AP (Deutsch, 2013; Parncutt & Levitin, 2001; Takeuchi & Hulse, 1993; Terhardt & Seewann, 1983; Terhardt & Ward, 1982).Studies of latent AP show that it is more common than AP among the general population. In a study by Halpern (1989),22 undergraduate students were recorded singing familiar folk songs in sessions 48 hr apart. The pitch levels of the songs were consistent among multiple performances, differing in pitch by an average of 1.28 semitones. Bergeson and Trehub (2002) recorded 15 mothers singing folk songs and lullabies to their infants in sessions approximately 1 week apart. The performances, from session to session, differed in pitch by an average of 0.82 semitones. Levitin (1994) noted that folk songs do not occur in any one standard key and could be encountered in a number of different keys, which may lead to less accuracy in production. For his study, Levitin asked 46 undergraduate and graduate students to choose a CD that contained a familiar song. By using commercial recordings on CD, the assumption was that there was one correct pitch level for the song, which would give an objective standard for judging pitch memory. In two separate trials, students were instructed to hold the CD while imagining a song, and then to sing the song. On average, the performances differed in pitch from the original recordings by ^1 semitone. Also, 40% of the participants sang at least one song at the correct pitch, and 12% sang both songs at the correct pitch. Frieler et al. (2013) replicated Levitin's study with 277 participants and found a similar, albeit smaller, effect: 25% of the participants sang at least one song at the correct pitch, and 4% sang both songs at the correct pitch, with a considerable difference in results among the six participating labs. The results of both studies were above chance levels, which were 17% for singing at least one song at the correct pitch, and 0.7% for singing both songs at the correct pitch. Frieler et al. noted that the smaller effect in their study may have been caused by the availability of popular songs on the Internet; in particular, pitch levels for the same recording may differ on streaming Web sites, resulting in multiple correct pitch levels (also noted in Jakubowski & Mullensiefen, 2013; Plazak, 2012).Listening-based studies of latent AP have found that persons who do not possess AP can discern whether a familiar song is in its original key or transposed, even if the level of transposition is only 1 semitone. In Schellenberg and Trehub's (2003) study, 48 college students listened to 5-s instrumental excerpts of theme songs from popular TV shows. …