Absence Of Surgical Resection Research Articles

Factors Associated With Long-term Survival in Children With Bronchial and Lung Carcinoid Tumors

Background and aimsBronchial carcinoids are rare in children and the treatment is based on tumor behavior in adults. The purpose of this study was to determine factors and management strategies associated with long-term survival in the pediatric population using a national cohort. MethodsPatients aged ≤20 years with bronchial carcinoid tumors were identified in the 2004–2020 National Cancer Database using ICD-O-3 codes. Tumor characteristics and management were compared among typical (TC) and atypical (AC) histological subtypes using Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. Kaplan–Meier and univariate Cox proportional hazards analyses were used to assess survival. ResultsOf 273 patients, 251 (92%) had TCs, and 22(8%) had ACs. The median (IQR) age was 18 (16,19) years. Most patients underwent lobectomy or bilobectomy (67%), followed by sublobar resection (17%), no resection or bronchoscopic excision or ablation (8%), and pneumonectomy (7.7%). Margins were negative in 96%. Lymph node (LN) assessment was performed in 216 patients (84%) with a median (IQR) of 7(3,13) LNs, and 50 (23%) had ≥1 positive LN. There was no difference in age, resection, margin status, LN assessment, or positivity between TC and AC (all p > 00.05). Detection of nodal metastasis did not increase beyond the resection of 1–3 LNs (p = 0.72). Ten-year survival was worse for AC than TC (79% (41, 100) vs 98% (95, 100), HR = 6.9 (95% CI: 1.2–38.3, p = 0.03). Ten-year survival among those with and without LN assessment was 97% (94, 100) vs 91% (81, 100), HR = 4.0, 95% CI: 0.8–19.9, p = 0.09). There were no deaths in those with negative LN while 10-year survival was 89% (72, 100) in those with ≥1 positive LN. ConclusionAmong children with bronchial carcinoids, survival is excellent with TC or negative LN. Atypical histology and positive LN have poor survival and should prompt close monitoring. These risk factors may be missed in the absence of surgical resection and lymph node sampling. Level of EvidenceIII. Type of StudyRetrospective Study.

Factors associated with surgical resection in patients with Crohn's disease: long-term evaluation.

To evaluate patient characteristics and factors associated with surgical resection in patients with Crohn's disease (CD). An analysis was performed on data from 295 patients with CD in follow-up from 2001 to 2018. Medical record data comprised age, gender, location, behavior and duration of the CD, smoking, and extraintestinal manifestation. Patients were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of surgical resection. Out of the 295 patients with CD, 155 underwent surgical resection (53.2% male, mean age: 43.88 ± 14.35 years). The main indications for surgery were stenosis (44.5%), clinical intractability (15.5%), and intra-abdominal fistulas (15.5%). Smoking (p < 0.001), longer CD duration (p < 0.0001), ileo-colonic location (p = 0.003), stenosing behavior (p < 0.0001), and fistulizing behavior (p < 0.0001) were significantly associated with surgical resection. Initial use of biological was significantly more frequent in the group of patients without surgical resection (p < 0.001). Patients with CD still frequently need surgical treatment. Smoking (current or past), longer disease time, stenosing and fistulizing behavior, and ileo-colonic localization in CD patients were associated with a higher risk of surgery. Awareness about factors associated with unfavorable outcome allows such patients to be treated more appropriately.

Proton Therapy With Concurrent Chemotherapy for Thoracic Esophageal Cancer: Toxicity, Disease Control, and Survival Outcomes.

When treating esophageal cancer with radiation therapy, it is critical to limit the dose to surrounding structures, such as the lung and/or heart, as much as possible. Proton radiation therapy allows a reduced radiation dose to both the heart and lungs, potentially reducing the risk of cardiopulmonary toxicity. Here, we report disease control, survival, and toxicity outcomes among patients with esophageal cancer treated with proton radiation therapy and concurrent chemotherapy (chemoradiation therapy; CRT) with or without surgery. We enrolled 17 patients with thoracic esophageal carcinoma on a prospective registry between 2010 and 2021. Patients received proton therapy to a median dose of 50.4-GyRBE (range, 50.4-64.8) in 1.8-Gy fractions.Acute and late toxicities were graded per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0 (US National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland). In addition, disease control, patterns of failure, and survival outcomes were collected. Nine patients received preoperative CRT, and 8 received definitive CRT. Overall, 88% of patients had adenocarcinoma, and 12% had squamous cell carcinoma. With a median follow-up of 2.1 years (range, 0.5-9.4), the 3-year local progression-free, disease-free, and overall survival rates were 85%, 66%, and 55%, respectively. Two patients (1 with adenocarcinoma and 1 with squamous cell carcinoma) recurred at the primary site after refusing surgery after a complete clinical response to CRT. The most common acute nonhematologic and hematologic toxicities, respectively, were grades 1 to 3 esophagitis and grades 1 to 4 leukopenia, both affecting 82% of patients. No acute cardiopulmonary toxicities were observed in the absence of surgical resection. Reagarding surgical complications, 3 postoperative cardiopulmonary complications occurred as follows: 1 grade 1 pleural effusion, 1 grade 3 pleural effusion, and 1 grade 2 anastomotic leak. Two severe late CRT toxicities occurred: 1 grade 5 tracheoesophageal fistula and 1 grade 3 esophageal stenosis requiring a feeding tube. Proton radiation therapy is a safe, effective treatment for esophageal cancer with increasing evidence supporting its role in reducing cardiopulmonary toxicity.

Clinical features and overall survival of osteosarcoma of the mandible

Osteosarcoma is the most common bone sarcoma and is typically found in the distal femur, proximal tibia, and proximal humerus. While several factors are known to influence survival, less is known regarding the influence of primary tumor location. This study describes the clinical features and prognosis of mandibular osteosarcoma. The SEER database was utilized to identify cases of mandibular osteosarcoma diagnosed between 2004 and 2015. Sex, age, grade, histological subtype, tumor size, tumor extension, presence of metastasis at diagnosis, and therapeutic intervention were determined. Osteosarcomas originating from other sites were assessed for comparison. There were 164 cases of mandibular osteosarcoma identified, representing 5.5% of all surveyed osteosarcomas. The 2-, 5-, and 10-year overall survival rates were 79.9%, 65.6% and 58.5%, respectively. Survival was worse for patients with older age, larger tumor size, metastatic disease, and absence of surgical resection. Compared to other sites, mandibular osteosarcomas were significantly smaller tumors and were far less likely to metastasize. Mandibular osteosarcoma manifested at an older age than the more common extremity osteosarcomas and presented with smaller tumors. Rates of metastasis of jaw osteosarcoma were much lower than osteosarcoma found in the extremities, while mortality rates were comparable.

Surgery after sunitinib administration to improve survival of patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms.

BackgroundLittle research is available regarding the treatments combining surgical resection with systemic chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm patients. We retrospectively elucidated whether sunitinib administration before surgery in advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm (Pan‐NEN) patients increases survival.MethodsThis study included 106 of 326 Pan‐NEN patients with distant metastases and/or unresectable locally advanced tumors who visited our department to receive sunitinib for more than 1 mo during April 2002 to December 2019. Risk factors for overall survival (OS) and disease‐free survival (DFS) were analyzed.ResultsThe median duration of preoperative sunitinib administration and observation time after sunitinib were 6 and 26.5 mo, respectively. Of 106 patients, 31 (29.2%) underwent surgery following sunitinib administration. Hepatectomy, synchronous hepatopancreatectomy, pancreatectomy, and lymphadenectomy were performed for 13, 12, 5, and 1 patient, respectively. The 5‐y OS rates in the resected and nonresected groups were 88.9% and 14.1%, respectively (P < .001). In the multivariate analysis, the absence of surgical resection following sunitinib (hazard ratio [HR], 13.1; P = .001), poor differentiation (HR, 5.5; P = .007), and bilateral liver metastases (HR, 3.7; P = .048) were independent risk factors for OS, although large liver tumor volumes were more evident in the nonresected group, as patient characteristics. The median DFS was 16.1 mo in 22 patients who underwent R0/1 resections, and risk factors for postoperative recurrence were Ki‐67 index >7.8% (HR, 7.4; P = .02) and R1 resection (HR, 4.4; P = .04).ConclusionSurgical resection after sunitinib administration improved OS in advanced Pan‐NENs.

Clinicopathologic characteristics, laboratory parameters, treatment protocols, and outcomes of pancreatic cancer: a retrospective cohort study of 1433 patients in China.

ObjectivesThe prognosis of people with pancreatic cancer is extremely unfavorable. However, the prognostic factors remain largely undefined. We aimed to perform comprehensive analyses of clinicopathologic characteristics, laboratory parameters, and treatment protocols for exploring their role as prognostic factors of pancreatic cancer.MethodsPatients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer and hospitalized at the China National Cancer Center between April 2006 and May 2016 were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study. Clinicopathologic characteristics, laboratory parameters, and treatment protocols were compared among patients at different stages of the disease. The association between these factors and overall survival (OS) was analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model.ResultsThe present study included 1,433 consecutive patients with pancreatic cancer. Median OS was 10.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 9.8–11.3 months), with 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates of 43.7%, 14.8%, and 8.8%, respectively. Cox multivariate analysis findings identified the following factors as independent predictors of OS: gender (female vs male, hazard ratio 0.72, 95% CI [0.54–0.95]); elevated total bilirubin (TBil; 1.82, 1.34–2.47); elevated carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9; 1.72, 1.17–2.54); tumor being located in pancreatic body and tail (1.52, 1.10–2.10); advanced T stage (T3-4 vs T1-2, 1.62, 1.15–2.27); lymph node metastasis (1.57, 1.20–2.07); distant metastasis (1.59, 1.12–2.27); the presence of surgical resection (0.53, 0.34–0.81); and the presence of systemic chemotherapy (0.62, 0.45–0.82).ConclusionsBeing male, elevated TBil and carcinoembryonic antigen, tumor being located in pancreatic body and tail, advanced T stage, lymph node and distant metastasis, the absence of surgical resection, and the absence of systematic chemotherapy were associated with worse OS in patients with pancreatic cancer.

The changing paradigm of management in melanoma brain metastases.

e21027 Background: Brain metastases (BM) are a frequent complication in patients with metastatic melanoma (MM). We aimed to explore the outcome of these patient with modern therapeutic options. Methods: We retrospectively analysed 142 patients diagnosed with BM at a single site in Brisbane, QLD, Australia during 2009-2016. Basic clinico-pathological parameters, treatments used and mortality data were collected. Results: Patient characteristics included a median age of 57(17-82) years, presence of seizures (N = 18), dexamethasone use (N = 106) and BRAF mutant mm (N = 117). BM were categorised as solitary (N = 45), 2-6 (N = 65), more than 6 (N = 28) and leptomeningeal only (N = 4). BM were found on systemic treatment in 62 patients. Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) was used after the diagnosis of BM (N = 50). Management of BM included surgical resection (N = 39), Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) (N = 33) and Whole Brain Radiotherapy (N = 45). Immunotherapy with Ipilimumab (N = 35), Pembrolizumab (N = 36) and Nivolumab (N = 21) was used. With a median follow up of 8 months, 115 patients had died, 112 from MM. Death occurred due to progressive disease in the brain (N = 66), systemically (N = 13) or both (N = 33). The number of patients dying of mm were statistically higher on dexamethasone, increasing number of BM, BRAF mutants, absence of surgical resection or SRS and absence of immunotherapy use. Statistically Improved OS were found with solitary BM, treatment naive patients and surgical management of BM. In BRAF mutant patients who were TKI naïve at diagnosis of BM the mean OS was 14.7 versus 6.5 months in patients on TKI treatment (P &lt; 0.05). In BRAF wild type patients mean OS was 11.7 months with PD1 use versus 8.3 months without PD1 use (Not Significant). Conclusions: Despite improvements in systemic treatment for mm the outcomes of those with BM remains poor. Solitary BM amenable to resection or ablation provides optimal treatment. The use of TKIs in BRAF mutant mm post BM diagnosis and the use of immunotherapy are effective treatment options.

Comparison of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with carboplatin/paclitaxel (CP) versus cisplatin/5-FU (CF) for esophageal or junctional cancer: Experience from the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre.

126 Background: The optimal CRT regimen for neoadjuvant or definitive treatment of locoregional esophageal or gastroesophageal junctional (GEJ) cancer is uncertain. There has been no direct comparison between concurrent Cisplatin/5-FU (CF) as per the CALGB 9781 trial (50.4 Gy) or Carboplatin/Paclitaxel (CP) as per the CROSS trial (41.4 Gy). Methods: A retrospective analysis comparing CF and CP was performed in all patients (pts) with locoregional esophageal or GEJ cancer treated in 2012-2014. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were assessed via uni- and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression, adjusting for age, performance status and Charlson comorbidity index. Pathological complete response (pCR) rates were compared using Fisher’s exact test. Results: 64/86 (74%) pts were male. Median age was 64 years (range: 34-84). Primary sites were esophageal (56%, with 60% squamous histology) and GEJ (44%, with 11% squamous). 22 pts received CRT in 2012 (100% CF), 33 pts in 2013 (58% CF, 42% CP) and 31 pts in 2014 (16% CF, 84% CP). Surgery was undertaken in 19 (41%) CF and 27 (68%) CP pts. Median follow-up was 38 months. We found no significant OS difference between CF and CP overall (HR 0.82, 95% CI: 0.43-1.56, p = 0.55) or in the subgroup having surgery (n = 46; HR 2.01, 95% CI: 0.62-6.55, p = 0.25). However, in the subgroup without surgery (n = 40), CF (n = 27) was superior to CP (n = 13)(HR 0.11, 95% CI: 0.03-0.38, p &lt; 0.001). OS was similar by histology (adenocarcinoma/squamous) in all-comers (p = 0.96), and in CF (p = 0.66) and CP subgroups (p = 0.66). DFS results were similar to OS. There was a non-significant numerical difference in pCR rates between CF (31%) and CP (18%) (p = 0.45). Conclusions: Survival is similar for CF and CP CRT regimens in patients undergoing trimodality therapy. pCR rates were comparable but lower than previously reported. In contrast, in the absence of surgical resection, CP given for CRT results in significantly inferior outcomes. Clinicians may prefer CP for surgical candidates given its toxicity profile. However, when treating with definitive CRT, CF may be preferable to CP as a standard regimen.

Neoadjuvant interferon‐based chemoradiation for borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreas cancer: a Phase II pilot study

ObjectivesNeoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is a viable treatment strategy for patients with pancreatic cancer. This study was conducted to evaluate the Virginia Mason Protocol (5‐fluorouracil, cisplatin, interferon‐α and radiation) given in the neoadjuvant setting for the treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer. MethodsA Phase II pilot study evaluating interferon‐based neoadjuvant CRT in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer was performed. ResultsA total of 23 patients were enrolled. The mean age of the patients was 58.6 years. Of the 23 patients, seven (30.4%) completed all treatments. In the remaining 16 (69.6%) patients, treatment was interrupted as a result of toxicity. The most commonly reported effects of toxicity were leucopoenia/cytopoenia (n = 19, 82.6%) and gastrointestinal effects (n = 19, 82.6%). Surgical resection was successful in seven (30.4%) patients. Margins were negative in six (85.7%) of these seven patients. Positive lymph nodes were identified in three (42.9%) of seven patients. Overall survival was 11.5 months. Surgery provided improved survival (22.6 months) compared with CRT alone (8.8 months). Disease‐free survival in resected patients was 17.2 months. ConclusionsInterferon‐based neoadjuvant CRT may allow for resection of locally advanced pancreatic cancer, but with significant toxicity. In the absence of surgical resection, survival remains dismal.

Reply

Reply

Neoadjuvant interferon-based chemoradiation for locally advanced pancreas cancer: A phase II pilot study.

266 Background: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is a viable treatment strategy for patients with locally advanced pancreas cancer. We evaluated the Virginia Mason Protocol (5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, interferon-α and radiation) given in the neoadjuvant setting for the treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Methods: We performed a phase II pilot study treating patients with locally advanced pancreas cancer, including borderline resectable and initially non-resectable cases. Patients with evidence of metastases, previous chemotherapy, ECOG performance status &gt;1, or inadequate hematologic, renal or hepatic function were excluded. Results: We enrolled 23 patients between 1/2005 and 10/2010. Mean age at enrollment was 58.6 years. Males made up 73.4% of the cohort. Of 23 patients, 7 (30.4%) completed all treatments. The remaining 16 (69.6%) patients did not receive all scheduled treatments due to severe side effects (n=7, 30.4%), progressive disease (n=3, 13%), alternative treatment (n=3, 13%), patient withdrawal (n=1, 4.3%), other disease (n=1, 4.3%), and death on study (n=1, 4.3%). Hospitalization was required due to toxicity for 47.8% (n=11) of patients. The most commonly reported grade 3 or 4 toxicities were leucopenia/cytopenia (n=19, 82.6%) and gastrointestinal (n=19, 82.6%). Other toxicities were much less common (fatigue, weight loss, pain, skin rash, all n&lt;3). Tumor regression was not seen in any patient. Surgical resection was ultimately successful in 7 (30.4%) cases. Surgical margins were negative in 6 of 7 cases (85.7%). The mean lymph node count was 11. Positive lymph nodes were identified in 3 of 7 cases (42.8%). Overall survival for all patients was 11.5 months. Surgical resection provided significantly improved survival (22.6 months) compared to CRT alone (8.8 months). Disease free survival in resected patients was 17.2 months. Conclusions: Aggressive neoadjuvant CRT with immunotherapy may allow for resection of initially non-resectable, locally advanced pancreas cancer, but with significant toxicity. Overall survival was similar to other, less toxic regimens. In the absence of surgical resection, survival remains dismal.

Maintenance of Remission Among Patients With Crohn's Disease on Antimetabolite Therapy After Infliximab Therapy Is Stopped

It is important to determine whether infliximab therapy can be safely interrupted in patients with Crohn's disease who have undergone a period of prolonged remission. We assessed the risk of relapse after infliximab therapy was discontinued in patients on combined maintenance therapy with antimetabolites and identified factors associated with relapse. We performed a prospective study of 115 patients with Crohn's disease who were treated for at least 1 year with scheduled infliximab and an antimetabolite and had been in corticosteroid-free remission for at least 6 months. Infliximab was stopped, and patients were followed up for at least 1 year. We associated demographic, clinical, and biologic factors with time to relapse using a Cox model. After a median follow-up period of 28 months, 52 of the 115 patients experienced a relapse; the 1-year relapse rate was 43.9% ± 5.0%. Based on multivariable analysis, risk factors for relapse included male sex, the absence of surgical resection, leukocyte counts >6.0 × 10(9)/L, and levels of hemoglobin ≤145 g/L, C-reactive protein ≥5.0 mg/L, and fecal calprotectin ≥300 μg/g. Patients with no more than 2 of these risk factors (approximately 29% of the study population) had a 15% risk of relapse within 1 year. Re-treatment with infliximab was effective and well tolerated in 88% of patients who experienced a relapse. Approximately 50% of patients with Crohn's disease who were treated for at least 1 year with infliximab and an antimetabolite agent experienced a relapse within 1 year after discontinuation of infliximab. However, patients with a low risk of relapse can be identified using a combination of clinical and biologic markers.

Expérience de l’irradiation encéphalique totale avec escalade de dose focalisée pour le traitement des métastases cérébrales uniques d’un carcinome bronchopulmonaire

Purpose To assess the potential benefit of a boost in patients treated with whole brain irradiation by a conventional linear accelerator for lung cancer solitary brain metastasis. Patients and methods From 2002 to 2006, a retrospective analysis was carried out from 64 unselected consecutive patients with secondary brain metastasis from lung cancer, treated with whole brain irradiation without surgical resection. Thirty patients (47%) received a boost in their brain metastases. Three potential prognostic factors were studied: sex, RPA score and improvement of neurological symptoms after radiotherapy. An analysis was conducted to determine whether an additional dose may improve survival in the absence of surgical resection. Results The mean follow-up was 4.9 months. The median overall survival was 8.5 months (6.4 to 10.7 months). The total dose of radiotherapy was the only significant prognostic factor for overall survival. The median overall survival was 6.2 months for patients without additional radiation versus 11.2 months for patients receiving a boost dose ( p = 0.011). Sex, RPA score and improvement of neurological symptoms after radiotherapy were not found as prognostic factors for overall survival. Conclusions Boost delivered after whole brain radiation therapy by a conventional particle accelerator may provide a benefit in selected patients, especially for centres that do not have radiotherapy techniques in stereotactic conditions. This warrants further prospective assessment.

Surgery for renal cell carcinoma metastases

Despite the emergence of molecular targeted systemic therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma, cure is uncommonly achieved in the absence of surgical resection. We review the current role of metastasectomy and factors associated with outcome. Recent publication of large observational studies has better defined the expected prognosis of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma with or without metastasectomy. These data have highlighted prognostic factors for survival in patients treated with metastasectomy. Patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma should be considered for multimodal therapy, including surgery. A proportion of patients will achieve long-term survival with aggressive surgical resection.

Systemic chemotherapy of liver tumors

Primary and secondary liver tumors have a reputation for being resistant to chemotherapy and, in the absence of surgical resection, rapidly fatal. Until recently, such a reputation was well justified: response rates above 20% were not seen, and complete responses were distinctly rare. Over the past 5 years, the mood of those in the field has become rather more optimistic and a pattern of effective therapy is emerging. This involves combination therapy in patients with unresectable disease to increase the operative rates, and postoperative adjuvant therapy to decrease the high relapse rate which is so characteristic of both primary and secondary liver tumors. In the case of hepatocellular carcinoma, the combination therapy involves cytotoxic drugs and interferon. With secondary colorectal cancer (CRC), the combination of 5-fluorouracil (FU) and leucovorin, together with one of the new cytotoxic agents such as oxaliplatin or irenotecan, is producing much higher response rates and prolonged survival, and permitting a higher resection rate. Postoperative treatment is also showing promise in decreasing the relapse rate. With CRC metastatic to the liver, this involves hepatic artery infusion (HAI), systemic 5-FU, and leucovorin. Adjuvant systemic therapy of HCC has not yet been widely tested, but success with locoregional lipiodol iodine131 is proof of principle. The coming decade should see a significant improvement in the outlook of patients with malignant liver tumors as multimodality treatment becomes more widely investigated and practiced.

Ewing's sarcoma: surgical resection as a prognostic factor

A retrospective review of 46 cases of Ewing's (43) and extraosseous Ewing's (3) sarcoma was performed to examine for prognostic factors. Follow-up ranged from 27 to 135 months with a mean of 77.6 months, 86% greater than 36 months. Nine (20%) patients presented with distant metastases, 98% received multiagent chemotherapy, and 98% received radiation therapy. Overall actuarial survival and local control at 5 years were .52 ± .08 and .78 ± .07, respectively. The freedom from relapse or treatment related mortality at 5 years was .46 ± .08. In 12 (26%) patients, surgical resection of the involved bone or soft tissue was part of the initial treatment plan. Ninety-two percent ( 11 12 ) of these patients also received radiation therapy. In addition to surgical resection, tumor size (<500 cc vs. ≥500 cc), primary site (central vs. other), and stage were also analyzed for prognostic significance, and where appropriate, were included in Cox multivariate analyses. Considering all patients, the 5-year actuarial survival was .92 ± .08 vs. .37 ± .09 for patients receiving and not receiving surgical resection, respectively ( p = .001 by logrank, p = .02 by Cox). To make the groups more comparable, 8 patients with local failure and 5 patients with non-evaluable primary sites were excluded. After these exclusions, the presence or absence of surgical resection had decreased significance: .92 ± .08 vs. .59 ± .11, respectively; p = .01 by logrank, p = .07 by Cox. Only primary site remained statistically significant: .86 ± .08 for noncentral sites vs. .38 ± .16 for central sites, p < .0002 by logrank, p = .0004 by Cox. Surgical resection when added to local irradiation has prognostic significance in this retrospective review. The reason for this is not clear, but may be related to a decrease in local failure after resection.