Absence Of Hepatitis B Surface Antigen Research Articles

Genetic risk assessment based on association and prediction studies

The genetic basis of phenotypic emergence provides valuable information for assessing individual risk. While association studies have been pivotal in identifying genetic risk factors within a population, complementing it with insights derived from predictions studies that assess individual-level risk offers a more comprehensive approach to understanding phenotypic expression. In this study, we established personalized risk assessment models using single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data from 200 Korean patients, of which 100 experienced hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seroclearance and 100 patients demonstrated high levels of HBsAg. The risk assessment models determined the predictive power of the following: (1) genome-wide association study (GWAS)-identified candidate biomarkers considered significant in a reference study and (2) machine learning (ML)-identified candidate biomarkers with the highest feature importance scores obtained by using random forest (RF). While utilizing all features yielded 64% model accuracy, using relevant biomarkers achieved higher model accuracies: 82% for 52 GWAS-identified candidate biomarkers, 71% for three GWAS-identified biomarkers, and 80% for 150 ML-identified candidate biomarkers. Findings highlight that the joint contributions of relevant biomarkers significantly influence phenotypic emergence. On the other hand, combining ML-identified candidate biomarkers into the pool of GWAS-identified candidate biomarkers resulted in the improved predictive accuracy of 90%, demonstrating the capability of ML as an auxiliary analysis to GWAS. Furthermore, some of the ML-identified candidate biomarkers were found to be linked with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), reinforcing previous claims that HCC can still occur despite the absence of HBsAg.

The Prevalence of Occult Hepatitis B Infection among Blood Donors in Lagos, Nigeria.

Background:In occult hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, the HBV DNA is present in the blood or liver tissue in patients negative for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) with or without anti-HBV antibodies. Thus, the absence of HBsAg in the blood only reduces the risk of transmission and is not sufficient enough to ensure the absence of HBV infection.Aim:This study was aimed at determining the prevalence of occult HBV infection among blood donors in Lagos.Study Designs:A cross-sectional study was done among 101 consenting blood donors at Lagos State University Teaching Hospital, Ikeja, between November 2016 and January 2017.Materials and Methods:HBV DNA analysis and viral load were done at the Molecular Laboratory of National Sickle Cell Centre, Idi Araba, Lagos, for all the HBsAg negative blood donors screened by rapid kit at Ikeja.Results:The prevalence of occult HBV DNA among the participants was 3% consisting of 3% prevalence of HBV DNA surface antigen and 0% prevalence for precore and core of the HBV DNA.Conclusion:The low prevalence (3%) of occult HBV seen in our study does not make it cost-effective to routinely screen blood donors or the general population for HBV infection using DNA polymerase chain reaction.

Reactivation of Occult HBV Infection in Patients Cured of HCV With Direct-Acting Antivirals

The era of hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment with direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy has remarkably improved liver-related morbidity and overall mortality with patients achieving rapid and sustained clearance of HCV infection. The initial DAA clinical trials excluded patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) co-infection, and thus potential complications were unforeseen until case reports of HBV reactivation associated with DAA therapy began to emerge. A recent United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) drug safety communication has brought public attention to the issue of HBV reactivation in patients treated with DAA for HCV co-infection. Reactivation of HBV is well known to occur with a variety of immune-suppressive therapies notably in the context of cancer, rheumatologic treatments, and organ transplantation. While HBV reactivation in the setting of DAA therapy remains rare, the severity of hepatitis can be profound and deadly. Early recognition and treatment are keys to improving patient outcomes. Therefore, it is currently recommended to screen all patients for current or prior HBV infection prior to starting DAA therapy. If either hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) or hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc) is positive, HBV DNA should be obtained. With active viremia, prophylactic therapy should be started with DAA treatment with an agent with a high barrier for resistance. If there is no evidence of active viremia, the risks and benefits of prophylactic therapy should be weighed. Those with positive HBsAg should consider prophylactic therapy. Those with an isolated anti-HBc in the absence of HBsAg have an option of monitoring their liver enzymes, HBV DNA, and HBsAg at regular intervals during DAA therapy. If prophylactic HBV therapy is initiated, it should be continued for at least 3 months after DAA therapy is complete. After this period, the risks and benefits of continuing their HBV therapy should be re-addressed.

Hepatitis B Surface Antigen Should Not Be the Only Sought Marker to Distinguish Blood Donors towards Hepatitis B Virus Infection in High Prevalence Area

Since its discovery by Blumberg in 1965, the hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) is used as the fingerprint of hepatitis B infection. Occult hepatitis B infection (OBI) is defined by a viral replication (DNA detectable) in the absence of HBsAg. Burkina Faso is a high endemic area where the prevalence is higher than 14%. At the National Center for Blood Transfusion (NCBT) of Ouagadougou, HBsAg is the only sought marker used to distinguish donors towards Hepatitis B Virus (HBV). Acceptation of blood donation is based specifically on the absence of HBsAg, which exposes to the risk of HBV transmission during transfusion. The goal of this study is to evaluate this risk by determining the prevalence of OBI in blood donors. Patients and Methods: It was a five-month prospective study on blood donations collected from January to May 2016. The HBc antibody has been sought in the serums of negative HBsAg donors. The measure of B DNA by Real Time PCR (polymerase chain reaction) and that of antibodies anti-HBs have been proposed to anti-HBc positive donors. Abdominal ultrasound, the transaminases, prothrombin level, alphafeto-proteins, hepatic fibrosis have been proposed to donors who were detectable for the DNA. Sociodemographic parameters have been collected. The test costs were borne by donors who were recalled by phone to adhere to the study. Results: Among 1980 negative donors HBsAg, 872 (44%) were positive for anti-HBc. 160 on 872 donors were received for consultation, among which 76 (76/160) were able to realise DNA which was detectable in 25 donors on 76, thus a prevalence of 32.8%. The mean value of DNA was 953 IU/ml. Physical examination and hepatic ultrasounds were normal except a case where hepatic steatosis was found. The biologic standard hepatic results were in normal range. None of the patient was able to realise hepatic fibrosis evaluation. A case of co-infection HIV/OBI was noted. Conclusion: This study shows that in Burkina, almost half of blood bags transfused are anti-HBc positive and around one third (32.8%) probably have HBV DNA. This poses a potential risk of contamination for non-immunized recipient. It is thus important that, in addition to HBsAg, Anti-HBc should be systematically sought in order to minimize the risk.

Clinical and virological features of occult hepatitis B in patients with HBsAg seroclearance post‐treatment or spontaneously

Occult hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection (OHB) may exist in patients experiencing hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seroclearance. We examined the clinical and virological features of OHB in patients who lost HBsAg post-treatment or spontaneously. We collected 44 patients with HBsAg seroclearance: 15 patients with dual HBV/hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection who lost HBsAg after peginterferon alfa-2a (PEG-IFN) plus ribavirin therapy; 13 HBV mono-infected patients who lost HBsAg after various oral antiviral therapies; and 16 patients who lost HBsAg spontaneously. OHB was defined as detectable serum HBV DNA in the absence of HBsAg. Viral mutations associated with OHB were identified by comparison with matched controls that remained positive for HBsAg, and further characterized in vitro. The prevalence of OHB was 34.1% (15/44) in all patients, which was not significantly different among three groups. One mutation in surface promoter/polymerase region, C3050T (preS1T68I), was identified to be associated with the seroclearance of HBsAg in six cases. This mutation does not change the amino acid sequence of the polymerase protein. The S promoter activity was significantly lower in the construct containing C3050T mutation as compared with the wild-type (P=0.0008). However, this mutation did not affect HBV replication, transcription and translation in the context of the full-length HBV genome. OHB was not rare in patients with HBsAg seroclearance. One mutation, C3050T (preS1T68I), decreased S promoter activity; nevertheless, other factors may play more important role in the clearance of HBsAg in these OHB patients.

Treatment of Chronic Delta Hepatitis

Abstract This article does not have abstract.

Criteria for hepatitis B virus screening and validation of blood components in Italy: the position of the SIMTI HBV working group.

The screening strategies for the detection of blood donors potentially able to transmit an infection to the recipient of their blood or blood products have always included clinical, behavioural and laboratory criteria in an attempt to construct a multi-barrier system that most effectively guarantees transfusion safety1. These criteria are necessarily modified over time as further knowledge is acquired and new laboratory tests become available. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) causes the blood-borne viral infection for which serological markers for screening have been available for the longest time. Indeed, the introduction of a test to detect the hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) at the beginning of the 1970s certainly contributed to a drastic reduction in the number of HBV transfusion-transmitted infections. However, despite continuous improvements in the sensitivity of this test, transfusion-related transmission of hepatitis B has not been completely eliminated and in some countries an additional serological investigation (the search for antibodies against HBV core antigen, anti-HBc) was introduced. Testing for these antibodies was initially used as a surrogate marker for the detection of non-A, non-B hepatitis in the mid-1980s, but after the availability of a specific test for hepatitis C virus (HCV), it returned to being of specific relevance in the screening for HBV infection. More recently, a test to detect HBV DNA was introduced for the screening of blood donors. Crucially, this test can detect an acute HBV infection earlier than HBsAg and anti-HBc tests, thus reducing the so called window period during which an infected donors may harbour large amounts of infectious viral particles in the absence of serological markers and/or signs and symptoms of an ongoing infection2. Furthermore, DNA testing allows the identification of a number of donors -including periodic donors-characterised by the absence of HBsAg in the presence of HBV DNA with or without anti-HBs, anti-HBc and/or anti-HBe antibodies. These latter serological profiles are defined as occult HBV infection (OBI) in agreement with the Consensus Conference held in Taormina in 20083. In these cases, the amount of HBV DNA -when detectable- is usually very low (<100–200 IU/mL). On the basis of the serological profile, OBI can be distinguished into seropositive (anti-HBc and/or anti-HBs positive) or seronegative (anti-HBc and anti-HBs negative) types3. The tests that, at present, are mandatory in Italy for the prevention of transfusion-related transmission of HBV include HBsAg (using several commercially available last-generation immunoassays kits) and HBV DNA detection (50% of blood units are tested in pools of 6 samples by Roche Cobas Taqscreen MPX on the Cobas s 201 platform [Roche Instruments Center, Rotkreuz, Switzerland] and 50% in single tests by Novartis Ultrio [Emerville, CA] with comparable analytical and clinical sensitivity4,5). In addition, other serological tests are performed, with a heterogeneous distribution across the country, in part as an additional criterion for the validation of blood components (i.e. anti-HBc) and in part as an evaluation of the immunological status of the donor (i.e. anti-HBs). A national survey organised by the Italian Society of Transfusion Medicine and Immunohaematology (SIMTI) in 20096 found that 78 (43%) of 181 Transfusion Services (TS) that replied to a specific questionnaire routinely performed anti-HBc and that 53 of these 78 (68%) TS were located in Northern Italy Regions. In most of the TS (81%) participating in the study, this test was carried out in first-time donors only, while in the remaining (19%) it was carried out in all donors. Fifty percent of the TS that performed this test used a positive result for anti-HBc as a criterion to exclude antibody-positive donors from donating while the remaining TS did not. Thus, there are profound differences in the behaviour of TS, resulting from the persistence of criteria based on serological parameters and criteria derived from the introduction of the new molecular biology tests. In the light of this, SIMTI set up a Working Group charged with the task of defining the screening tests for HBV capable of guaranteeing the highest levels of safety compatible with the possibility of ensuring timely and appropriate transfusion therapy in the specific Italian epidemiological context, with the currently available technology.

Markers for hepatitis A, B and C in methadone maintained patients: an unexpectedly high co-infection with silent hepatitis B.

To determine the prevalence of hepatitis A, B and C viruses in patients attending a methadone maintenance clinic in New York City. Cross-sectional. The Adult Services Clinic of Weill Cornell Medical College, an urban hospital-affiliated methadone program. Former heroin addicted adults (n = 103) on methadone maintenance therapy. Markers for hepatitis A virus [HAV immunoglobulin M (IgM) and imunoglobulin G (IgG)], hepatitis B [hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B surface antibody (HBsAb) and hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb)] and hepatitis C virus (HCVAb). Serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and quantitative HCV RNA were also obtained. Qualitative detection of HBV DNA and HCV genotype were obtained in a subset of subjects. More than 40% of subjects had markers for all three viruses. HCVAb was the most prevalent (83.5%), followed by HBcAb (65.0%), HAV IgG (46.1%) and HBsAb (41.1%). Hepatitis C RNA was detected in 70.6% of HCVAb positive subjects. While no subject had HBsAg, HBV DNA was detected in 26.4% of subjects who underwent this measure; all (n = 20) had HBcAb as their only HBV marker. The presence of HBV DNA did not influence ALT. Subjects with HCV RNA had higher ALTs than those without HCV RNA. Most methadone-maintained subjects had at least one marker for viral hepatitis, with 41.8% having markers for HAV, HBV and HCV. A quarter of subjects had silent HBV infection, defined as the presence of HBV DNA in the absence of HBsAg. These subjects should be considered infectious and pose a public health risk.

Therapeutic efficacy of sequential and simultaneous treatments with interferon‐α and lamivudine in children with chronic hepatitis B

Interferon (IFN)-alpha and lamivudine (LAM), a nucleoside analog, are frequently used drugs for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB), and their combined therapy has been shown to be effective. The purpose of the present study was to examine the therapeutic efficacy of sequential and simultaneous combination therapies of IFN-alpha and LAM in children with CHB. A total of 45 children with CHB, whose antibody status was positive for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B envelope antigen (HBeAg), and HBV-DNA at least for 6 months; who had alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels 1.5-fold higher than normal and hepatic activity index scores higher than 6, were allocated to two groups. The first group included 24 children who were given standard dose IFN-alpha (5 MU/m(2) s.c., thrice weekly) for 6 months, followed by LAM (4 mg/kg per day per oral, maximum 100 mg/day) for an additional 6 months (sequential therapy group). The second group included 21 children who were given IFN-alpha and LAM therapy simultaneously for 6 months and who continued with LAM alone for another 6 months (simultaneous therapy group). Partial response was defined as normalization of ALT and eradication of HBV-DNA. Complete response was defined as normalization of ALT, eradication of HBV-DNA and e seroconversion. Non-responders were defined as having positive HBV-DNA and abnormal ALT levels. Sustained response was defined as absence of HBsAg and presence of hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs). The mean age of the sequential therapy group was 12.7 +/- 4.1 years, and 16 (66.7%) of the patients were male. The mean age of the simultaneous therapy group was 14.8 +/- 4.6 years, and 15 (71.4%) were male. In the first group, 13 patients (54.2%) were non-responders; partial response was observed in five patients (20.8%), and complete response was seen in six patients (25%). Despite the occurrence of e seroconversion, normalization of ALT was not achieved in one case. In the second group, which consisted of 21 patients, 11 subjects (52.4%) were non-responders; partial response was observed in one case (4.8%), and complete response was seen in seven (33.3%). Sustained response was found in two patients (9.5%). There were no significant differences between the groups (P > 0.05). When the therapeutic efficiency of two different treatment regimens applied for 1 year was evaluated in childhood CHB therapy, it was remarkable that there was a sustained response and a higher complete response in group 2, although there was no considerable difference between the therapy results of both groups.

Reactivation of Hepatitis B Infection following Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplantation in a Hepatitis B-Immune Patient: Case Report and Review of the Literature

Reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection following allogeneic bone marrow transplantation is a rare phenomenon. Reverse seroconversion, defined as the clearance of antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAb) and the appearance of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) in a patient with resolved HBV infection (i.e., a HBsAg-negative, HBsAb-positive, hepatitis B core antibody-positive patient) following receipt of a bone marrow transplant is described. A review of related cases in the literature was undertaken to identify clinical features associated with this phenomenon. We present a case of reactivation of HBV infection in a 47-year-old man after receipt of an allogeneic bone marrow transplant for acute myelogenous leukemia. Before undergoing bone marrow transplantation, the presence of HBsAb and hepatitis B core antibody and the absence of HBsAg indicated clearance of natural HBV infection. The donor was HBsAg and HBsAb negative. Twenty-nine months after bone marrow transplantation, the patient developed transaminitis and evidence of active HBV infection (the patient had test results positive for HBsAg, negative for HBsAb, and positive for HBV DNA). A total of 28 other cases of reverse seroconversion have been described in the literature, 11 of which provided adequate information to be summarized in detail together with the present case. Reactivation of HBV infection following bone marrow transplantation appears to occur almost exclusively in patients who have received marrow from an HBsAb-negative donor and have experienced graft-versus-host disease, the onset of which is associated with tapering of immunosuppressive therapy. Although HBV reverse seroconversion is an uncommon event, understanding the clinical features associated with the development of HBV reverse seroconversion may provide insight into how such a potentially fatal complication may be avoided.

SEN virus infection in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

Although most cases of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are associated with either the hepatitis B or C viruses (HBV, HCV), about 10-20% of HCCs occur in patients with chronic hepatitis that is aetiologically undefined. The aim of the present study was to determine the prevalence of the transfusion-transmitted SEN virus (SEN-V) in patients with HCC, including those patients who do not otherwise appear to be infected with HBV or HCV. Fragments of SEN-V subtypes D and H were amplified separately by PCR from the sera of 50 patients with HCC (31 from Canada and 19 from Japan) as well as from HCC and adjacent nontumourous liver tissues from eight of the Canadian patients. SEN-V DNA was found in the serum of 10 of 31 (32%) Canadian patients and eight of 19 (42%) Japanese patients [overall, 18 of 50 (36%) HCC patients]. SEN-V DNA was detected in the serum of 10 of 23 (43%) HCC patients with antibody to HCV (anti-HCV), six of 11 (55%) with hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), and two of 16 (12%) without detectable anti-HCV or HBsAg. Twenty-three HCC patients in this study had 'silent HBV,' characterized by the detection of HBV DNA in the absence of HBsAg; eight of these (35%) also had SEN-V infections. SEN-V DNA was detected in HCC patients most typically in those with coexistent HBV or HCV infection. SEN-V was found in only one of seven HCC patients without HBV (without HBsAg or HBV DNA) or HCV and thus does not appear to be an important cause of 'cryptogenic' HCC.

High prevalence of hepatitis delta virus infection detectable by enzyme immunoassay among apparently healthy individuals in Mongolia

A previous study revealed a high prevalence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and hepatitis delta virus (HDV) RNA among 249 apparently healthy individuals (mean+/-standard deviation age, 48.4+/-13.9 years; 126 males and 123 females) in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia. To investigate further the prevalence of HDV infection there, the same serum samples obtained from the cohort were tested for the presence of immunoglobulin G (IgG) class antibody to HDV (anti-HDV) by a newly developed enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using recombinant hepatitis delta antigen protein expressed in the pupae of silkworm as the antigen probe. Anti-HDV was detected in 42 persons (16.9%), among whom 22 (52.4%) were positive for HBsAg and 20 (47.6%) had detectable HDV RNA. Among 170 persons with anti-HBc in the absence of HBsAg, 20 (11.8%) tested positive for anti-HDV, and 1 of the 20 subjects was positive for HDV RNA. Of note, none of 55 anti-HBc-negative persons had anti-HDV, supporting the specificity of the anti-HDV assay. The optical density (OD) value of anti-HDV was significantly higher among HDV RNA-positive subjects (n=21) than among HDV RNA-negative subjects (n=21) (2.513+/-0.514 vs. 0.836+/-0.550, P<0.0001). The present study confirmed the extremely high prevalence of HDV infection in Mongolia, and identified a person who was positive for both anti-HDV and HDV RNA despite negativity for HBsAg and HBV DNA probably due to viral interference. The anti-HDV assay may be useful for further epidemiological studies on HDV infection in larger cohorts in urban and rural areas of Mongolia, where elucidation of the transmission route of HDV is required urgently.

Use of liver grafts from donors positive for antihepatitis B-core antibody (anti-HBc) in the era of prophylaxis with hepatitis-B immunoglobulin and lamivudine.

The increasing demand for transplantation has resulted in a trend toward using virologically compromised donors. We reviewed our experience with liver grafts from hepatitis-B surface antigen (HBsAg)(-), antibody to core antigen (anti-HBc)(+) donors. Sixty-two liver transplants using HBsAg(-), anti-HBc(+) donors were studied. The decision to use prophylaxis was based on the presence or absence of donor and recipient risk factors for posttransplant hepatitis-B virus (HBV) transmission or reinfection. If the donor or recipient showed positive HBVDNA, hepatitis-B immunoglobulin (HBIg) and lamivudine were used. If both donor and recipient HBVDNA were negative, a choice between lamivudine and no prophylaxis was made on the basis of presence or absence of HBsAg and antibody to the surface antigen (anti-HBs) in the recipient. No death or graft loss could be ascribed to HBV. Mild HBV infection occurred in two patients who were not taking the recommended prophylaxis. Among the other 60 patients, 1 showed positive e antigen (HBeAg) early after transplantation, and 2 (1 with recurrent cancer, 1 with HIV infection) showed HBsAg(+). None of the three patients had any other evidence of HBV infection. Forty-seven patients underwent liver biopsies. Changes consistent with hepatitis were observed in 26, and 24 had HCV infection; immunostains for HBV antigens were negative in all cases, and 7 showed positive HBVDNA. A selective protocol based on donor and recipient risk factors for post-liver transplant HBV infection can prevent hepatitis-B infection and avoid unnecessary administration of antiviral prophylaxis in recipients of HBsAg(-), anti-HBc(+) liver allografts.

Role of silent hepatitis B virus in chronic hepatitis B surface antigen(−) liver disease

Despite a number of studies documenting hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in the absence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) a causal relationship between silent HBV infection and liver disease remain difficult to establish. In particular, both the prevalence and clinical significance of this observation are poorly understood. Why is HBV replication apparently so low in these patients? A number of studies have tried to elucidate the mechanism of HBsAg negative infections, and considerable data documenting HBV infectivity or reinfection in the absence of detectable HBsAg support the hypothesis that in some of these cases, HBV is undergoing low-level replication in the liver and this, in several situations including: (1) chronic liver disease, alcoholic liver disease, hepatocellular carcinoma; (2) viral reactivation following cancer chemotherapy or immunosuppression and (3) transmission via transfusion or from human serum to chimpanzees. In a recent study including 50 patients with chronic liver disease of unknown etiology we could detect serum HBV DNA by nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in 15/50 patients (50% at the cirrhosis stage) in the absence of HBsAg; in the liver of the 15 patients both HBcAg and/or HBsAg can be detected at very low-level. Viral host factors allowing HBV persistence in the absence of HBsAg can depend on several mechanisms. Coinfections with HCV can explain only a proportion of HBsAg(−) HBV infections. Secondly, HBV mutations in the core promotor region leading to a minimal viral replication, or mutations in the HBsAg-encoding region might explain the absence of serological recognition. Finally, it is possible that in some cases host immune mechanisms can maintain HBV infection in a latent state until transmission to another individual who subsequently develops a more active infection especially when immunosuppressive therapy is employed. Existence of HBsAg(−) HBV infections should be taken into account by the use of sensitive PCR tests for prevention of viral transmission in the settings of blood donations and organ transplants.

Incidence of hepatitis C in patients receiving different preparations of hepatitis B immunoglobulins after liver transplantation.

Recurrence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection after liver transplantation is a clinical problem. Polyclonal immunoglobulins against hepatitis B surface antigen (HBIGs) prevent the recurrence of HBV infection, but no effective prophylaxis is available for HCV infection. Before screening of blood donors was introduced in France, HBIGs may have contained antibody to HCV (anti-HCV). To determine the influence of HBIG on the occurrence of hepatitis C after liver transplantation before and after 1990. Retrospective cohort study. Liver transplantation unit of a university hospital. 428 consecutive patients who had liver transplantation because of cirrhosis between 1984 and 1994. Detection of serum HCV RNA before and 1 year after transplantation and findings on liver graft biopsy. Among the 218 patients who had HCV infection before transplantation, the incidence of HCV viremia after transplantation was lower in those receiving HBIG than in those not receiving HBIG (25 of 46 patients [54%] compared with 162 of 172 patients [94%]; P < 0.001). In patients receiving HBIG, the incidence of HCV viremia after transplantation was lower among those who had transplantation before March 1990 than among those who had transplantation after this date (15 of 33 patients [45%] compared with 10 of 13 patients [77%]; P = 0.05). Among the 210 patients without HCV infection before transplantation, acquired infection was significantly less frequent in those receiving HBIG than in those not receiving HBIG (18 of 68 patients [26%] compared with 40 of 86 patients [47%]; P < 0.001). Passively transmitted anti-HCV was transiently detected in patients receiving HBIG before March 1990. Multivariate analysis in patients with HCV infection before transplantation showed that the absence of HBIG and transplantation after March 1990 were independent significant risk factors for chronic hepatitis C after transplantation. Polyclonal immunoglobulins that are treated for viral decontamination and contain anti-HCV could prevent HCV infection.

Presence of antibodies to the hepatitis B surface antigen is associated with an excess risk for hepatocellular carcinoma among non-Asians in Los Angeles County, California

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) exhibits a more than 50-fold variation in incidence worldwide. High-risk regions include East Asia and sub-Saharan Africa, while non-Asians in the United States constitute a low-risk population. We assessed 111 cases of histologically confirmed HCC and 128 community control subjects among non-Asians of Los Angeles County for the presence in serum of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), antibodies to HBsAg (anti-HBs), antibodies to the hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc), HBV DNA, and antibodies to the hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV). Anti-HCV positivity was significantly associated with a 12.6-fold increase in HCC risk (95% confidence limits = 4.7, 33.6). As expected, the presence of serum HBsAg and the presence of anti-HBc in the absence of anti-HBs were both positively associated with the risk of HCC. But most interestingly, among our study subjects, the presence of anti-HBs in the absence of HBsAg and HBV DNA (indicative of a resolved infection) was significantly related to a 4.7-fold increased risk for HCC (95% confidence limits = 2.2, 9.4). Overall, any serological evidence of prior HBV exposure was associated with a 9.4-fold elevation in HCC risk (95% confidence limits = 4.7, 18.7). The data also demonstrate a synergistic effect of HBV and HCV infections on the risk of HCC. We estimate that about 55% of HCC cases occurring in non-Asians of Los Angeles can be attributed to infection by the hepatitis B and/or C viruses.(Hepatology 1997 Jan;25(1):226-8)

Presence of antibodies to the hepatitis B surface antigen is associated with an excess risk for hepatocellular carcinoma among non-Asians in Los Angeles County, California.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) exhibits a more than 50-fold variation in incidence worldwide. High-risk regions include East Asia and sub-Saharan Africa, while non-Asians in the United States constitute a low-risk population. We assessed 111 cases of histologically confirmed HCC and 128 community control subjects among non-Asians of Los Angeles County for the presence in serum of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), antibodies to HBsAg (anti-HBs), antibodies to the hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc), HBV DNA, and antibodies to the hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV). Anti-HCV positivity was significantly associated with a 12.6-fold increase in HCC risk (95% confidence limits = 4.7, 33.6). As expected, the presence of serum HBsAg and the presence of anti-HBc in the absence of anti-HBs were both positively associated with the risk of HCC. But most interestingly, among our study subjects, the presence of anti-HBs in the absence of HBsAg and HBV DNA (indicative of a resolved infection) was significantly related to a 4.7-fold increased risk for HCC (95% confidence limits = 2.2, 9.4). Overall, any serological evidence of prior HBV exposure was associated with a 9.4-fold elevation in HCC risk (95% confidence limits = 4.7, 18.7). The data also demonstrate a synergistic effect of HBV and HCV infections on the risk of HCC. We estimate that about 55% of HCC cases occurring in non-Asians of Los Angeles can be attributed to infection by the hepatitis B and/or C viruses.

Hepatitis B core antibody screening of voluntary blood donors: an extended pilot study using a modified passive haemagglutination assay

Summary. Screening for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), even by the most sensitive techniques, fails to detect all carriers of the hepatitis B virus (HBV). The presence of hepatitis B core antibody (anti‐HBc) in the absence of HBsAg is a common finding in donors implicated in cases of post‐transfusion hepatitis B (PTHB), and viral DNA may also be demonstrated in many of these individuals. An extended pilot study of routine screening of all donations for anti‐HBc in addition to HBsAg was introduced into the Mersey and North Wales Regional Transfusion Service in November 1991 to improve surveillance for carriers of HBV. In order to reduce costs a modified passive haemagglutination assay was evaluated and found to have a sensitivity of 99% and specificity of 98% compared with a conventional assay. In the first 6 months 60 530 donations were tested and 12 (0–02%) were found to have anti‐HBc in the absence of HBsAg or adequate antibodies to HBsAg (anti‐HBs). These sera will later be submitted for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing in order to determine their infectivity or otherwise by the detection HBV DNA sequences.

Hepatitis C virus infection, HBsAg carrier state and hepatocellular carcinoma: Relative risk and population attributable risk from a case-control study in Italy

In 1990, a case-control study was conducted in Italy to investigate the possible association between HCV infection and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Serum samples from 65 subjects with newly diagnosed hepatocellular carcinoma and 99 hospital control subjects were tested for the presence of anti-HCV by second-generation ELISA test; positive sera were assayed by RIBA anti-HCV second-generation test. In addition, samples were tested for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), antibodies to the hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc), and antibodies to HBsAg (anti-HBs). The presence of HCV and/or HBsAg serologic markers was significantly associated with hepatocellular carcinoma risk: the relative risk (RR) of HCC was 21.3 (95% CI = 8.8–51.5) for anti-HCV positivity in the absence of HBsAg; the relative risk of HCC was 13.3 (95% CI = 5.5–32.2) for the presence of HBsAg in the absence of anti-HCV. A higher risk (77.0) was observed when both markers were present. These findings indicate that HCV and HBsAg are independent risk factors for HCC. The results of multivariate analysis showed that the adjusted RR linking anti-HCV and HCC was 26.9 (95% CI = 9.9–72.5), the adjusted RR linking HBsAg and HCC was 11.4 (95% CI = 3.1–41.4), whereas no association (RR 1.5; 95% CI = 0.6–3.6) was found to link HCC with anti-HBc and/or anti-HBs positivity. Through the computation of population attributable risk we estimate that 25% of HCC cases occurring in Italy could be attributed to anti-HCV positivity alone and 20% to HBsAg carrier state alone. These data provide evidence that HCV infection plays a major role in the development of HCC in Italy.

Correlation of hepatitis B surface antigen clearance with the route of hepatitis B virus infection

We studied 563 consecutive adults with acute hepatitis B hospitalized from May 1981 to May 1983 and their habitual heterosexual partners. Radio-immunoassays for the detection of serological markers of hepatitis A virus (HAV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) and enzyme-immunoassay for the detection of IgM antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (IgM anti-HBc) were used. Of the 563 patients, 503 (89.7%) were hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positive and 60 (10.7%) were HBsAg negative on admission. Absence of HBsAg on admission was observed significantly more frequently in patients infected possibly by the heterosexual route than in the remaining patients (23.3% versus 6.6%; P less than 0.001). This finding was independent of sex. These data show that the route of HBV infection rather than the sex appears to have a more important role in the rapid clearance of HBsAg.