The taxonomic history of the colubrid genera Conopsis and Toluca is complex and has been reviewed by Goyenechea and Flores-Villela (2000). The single character purportedly differentiating them has been called into question by several authors (e.g., Bogert and Oliver, 1945). Some workers recognize just one genus for this group (Bogert and Oliver, 1945; Goyenechea, 1995), whereas others have regarded the two genera as valid (Boulenger, 1894; Duges, 1896; Duellman, 1961). Taylor and Smith (1942) reviewed these genera and concluded that each was valid. According to these authors, species of Toluca have a groove on each posterior maxillary tooth, that is lacking in species of Conopsis. In spite of the review by Taylor and Smith (1942), the generic status of Conopsis and Toluca was questioned by Bogert and Oliver (1945) because the latter did not consider the putative diagnostic character sufficient for recognizing the genus Toluca. In addition to the presence or absence of grooves in the posterior maxillary teeth, another morphological character purportedly differentiating these genera is the condition of the loreal scale (Taylor and Smith, 1942). In Conopsis, the loreal scale may be present or fused with the nasal, whereas it is completely absent in Toluca. As part of revisionary work on these snakes, we reevaluated these putative, diagnostic features in all recognized taxa of both genera to assess their taxonomic utility, since the only way to allocate specimens to particular species has been on the basis of geographic provenance. We examined 659 museum specimens, including 199 Conopsis and 460 Toluca that represented all known taxa (10 species and subspecies) from throughout the geographical range of both genera (both are endemic to Mexico, distributed from Chihuahua to Oaxaca), in order to reevaluate their taxonomic status. The following characters were recorded: snout-vent length (SVL), total length (TL), diameter of the body (DIAM), number of ventral and subcaudal scales, supralabials, infralabials, presence-absence of the nasal, loreal, preocular, postocular, frontal, and genial scales, temporal formula, shape of the hemipenis, and dorsal and ventral color pattern. To determine the presence or absence of tooth grooves, maxillae were dissected on 43 specimens (Appendix 1) representing all recognized species and subspecies of each genus. One maxilla