Abnormal Esophageal Motor Function Research Articles

Diagnosis and Management of Achalasia: Updates of the Last Two Years.

Achalasia is a rare neurodegenerative disorder causing dysphagia and is characterized by abnormal esophageal motor function as well as the loss of lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation. The assessment and management of achalasia has significantly progressed in recent years due to the advances in high-resolution manometry (HRM) technology along with the improvements and innovations of therapeutic endoscopy procedures. The recent evolution of HRM technology with the inclusion of an adjunctive test, fluoroscopy, and EndoFLIP has enabled more precise diagnoses of achalasia to be made and the subgrouping into therapeutically meaningful subtypes. Current management possibilities include endoscopic treatments such as Botulinum toxin injected to the LES and pneumatic balloon dilation. Surgical treatment includes laparoscopic Heller myotomy and esophagectomy. Furthermore, in recent years, per oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has established itself as a principal endoscopic therapeutic alternative to the traditional laparoscopic Heller myotomy. The latest randomized trials report that POEM, pneumatic balloon dilatation, and laparoscopic Heller’s myotomy have comparable effectiveness and complications rates. The aim of the current review is to provide a practical clinical approach to dysphagia and to shed light on the most recent improvements in diagnostics and treatment of achalasia over the last two years.

Reduced Esophageal Contractility Is Associated with Dysplasia Progression in Barrett's Esophagus: A Multicenter Cohort Study.

The incidence of Barrett's esophagus (BE) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) continues to rise, and risk stratification of patients with BE is needed. Impaired esophageal motility is associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease; however, whether esophageal dysmotility is a risk factor for dysplasia progression in BE is incompletely understood. This study aimed to characterize esophageal motility patterns in patients with BE and identify physiologic factors associated with dysplasia progression in BE. This multicenter retrospective study assessed data from adult patients with histologically confirmed BE who underwent high-resolution esophageal manometry from 1/2014 to 1/2018 at four tertiary care centers. Longitudinal data were collected when available among patients with non-dysplastic BE (NDBE) and separated as: no dysplastic progression or positive dysplastic progression. Multivariable logistic regression assessed for independent predictors of dysplasia progression. Among 193 patients, histology at index endoscopy identified 152 (79%) NDBE, 23 (12%) low-grade dysplasia, 14 (7%) high-grade dysplasia, and 4 (2%) EAC. Ninety-eight (51%) had abnormal esophageal motor function on manometry. Longitudinal data were available for 84 of 152 patients with initial NDBE. Twelve (14%) exhibited dysplastic progression to low-grade (6) or high-grade (6) dysplasia. Mean esophageal distal contractile integral was lower for patients that progressed [455mmHgscm (SD 515)] compared with patients who did not progress [987mmHgscm (SD 953); aOR 1.21 (95% CI 1.01, 1.44)]. In this retrospective study of 193 BE patients, the majority exhibited abnormal esophageal motor function. Reduced esophageal contractility was independently associated with dysplastic progression in BE. Characterizing esophageal physiology in BE may help to risk stratify patients.

Chaotic peak propagation in patients with Jackhammer esophagus.

The contractile activity of Jackhammer esophagus(JE) is heterogeneous and abnormalities in the balance of pre- and post-peak contractile activity has been reported. We observed that the progression of the peak contraction is disordered in JE patients, which reflect underlying abnormalities in the inhibitory and excitatory influence in esophageal contraction. In order to better define this abnormality, we developed novel time metrics to define trajectory of the pressure wave peak and assessed it in healthy controls and JE patients. 38 patients with JE (ages 43-70, 19 females) and 71 asymptomatic controls (ages 19-48; 33 females) were retrospectively evaluated. High resolution manometry was performed in all subjects with 10 supine liquid swallows. The first 5 intact supine swallows and supine swallow with the greatest DCI were analyzed using ManoView™ software and customized MATLAB program. The time distance, negative time distance sum and chaotic ratio were calculated. JE patients were subcategorized by the Brief Esophageal Dysphagia Questionnaire (BEDQ) with cut-off of 6. Jackhammer patients had longer time distance, longer negative time distance, and higher chaotic ratio than controls( p < 0.001). The distribution of the number of negative time distances differed between JE patients with BEDQ>6 and BEDQ≤6. The trajectory of the pressure wave peak propagation commonly occurred in an unordered fashion in JE, but rarely in controls. Additionally, differences in pressure propagation trajectory was associated with higher symptom scores thus trajectory of the pressure wave peak may be an important marker of abnormal esophageal motor function.

Evaluation of Esophageal Motor Function With High-resolution Manometry

For several decades esophageal manometry has been the test of choice to evaluate disorders of esophageal motor function. The recent introduction of high-resolution manometry for the study of esophageal motor function simplified performance of esophageal manometry, and revealed previously unidentified patterns of normal and abnormal esophageal motor function. Presentation of pressure data as color contour plots or esophageal pressure topography led to the development of new tools for analyzing and classifying esophageal motor patterns. The current standard and still developing approach to do this is the Chicago classification. While this methodical approach is improving our diagnosis of esophageal motor disorders, it currently does not address all motor abnormalities. We will explore the Chicago classification and disorders that it does not address.

Manometric features of eosinophilic esophagitis in esophageal pressure topography

Although most of the patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) have mucosal and structural changes that could potentially explain their symptoms, it is unclear whether EoE is associated with abnormal esophageal motor function. The aims of this study were to evaluate the esophageal pressure topography (EPT) findings in EoE and to compare them with controls and patients with gastro-esophageal disease (GERD). Esophageal pressure topography studies in 48 EoE patients, 48 GERD patients, and 50 controls were compared. The esophageal contractile pattern was described for ten 5-mL swallows for each subject and each swallow was secondarily characterized based on the bolus pressurization pattern: absent, pan-esophageal pressurization, or compartmentalized distal pressurization. Thirty-seven percent of EoE patients were classified as having abnormal esophageal motility. The most frequent diagnoses were of weak peristalsis and frequent failed peristalsis. Although motility disorders were more frequent in EoE patients than in controls, the prevalence and type were similar to those observed in GERD patients (P=0.61, chi-square test). Pan-esophageal pressurization was present in 17% of EoE and 2% of GERD patients while compartmentalized pressurization was present in 19% of EoE and 10% of GERD patients. These patterns were not seen in control subjects. The prevalence of abnormal esophageal motility in EoE was approximately 37% and was similar in frequency and type to motor patterns observed in GERD. Eosinophilic esophagitis patients were more likely to have abnormal bolus pressurization patterns during swallowing and we hypothesize that this may be a manifestation of reduced esophageal compliance.

Megaösophagus infolge eines ösophagealen Leiomyoms und Ösophagitis beim Hund

A 13-year-old male intact Golden Retriever was presented for chronic regurgitation and vomitus. The only clinical abnormality was halitosis, a neurological examination was normal. Thoracic radiography revealed a moderately distended, air-filled esophagus and a presumptive diagnosis of idiopathic megaesophagus was made. No other disorder causing abnormal esophageal motor function could be identified. As supportive and anticholinergic therapy failed to improve the dogs condition and ongoing regurgitation worsened, owners opted for euthanasia. Postmortem examination revealed a small (1.5 cm diameter) mass in the terminal esophagus. Microscopically a leio-myoma with mild multifocal mixed-cell esophagitis was diagnosed. This report illustrates how a potentially curable disease such as leiomyoma can clinically mimic acquired idiopathic megaesophagus and emphasizes that additional diagnostic procedures (contrast study, esophagoscopy) can be indicated in individual cases.

Esophageal Dysmotility in Children With Eosinophilic Esophagitis

The pathophysiology of dysphagia in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is unknown but may be related to abnormal esophageal motor function. Symptoms rarely occur during stationary esophageal manometry, so it has been difficult to establish an association between symptoms and motor events. Our aim was to evaluate esophageal motor function in children with EoE with the use of stationary manometry and ambulatory prolonged esophageal manometry and pH-metry (PEMP). PEMP was performed in children with EoE and compared with controls and children with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Peristalsis was considered effective when the esophageal contractions had a normal amplitude and propagation. Results are expressed as mean+/-s.e. Seventeen patients with EoE, 13 with GERD, and 11 controls were studied. Values are expressed as mean+/-s.e. Stationary manometry identified abnormal peristalsis in 41% of children with EoE. During PEMP, children with EoE had an increased number of isolated (16.7+/-3.8 vs. 9.5+/-1.6 vs. 6.5+/-1.1; P<0.03) and high-amplitude contractions (4.1+/-1.2 vs. 1.8+/-0.8 vs. 0.1+/-0.1; P<0.03), and higher percentage ineffective peristalsis both during fasting (70.5%+/-2.5 vs. 57.8%+/-3.0 vs. 53.8%+/-1.9; P<0.05) and during meals (68.4+/-3.4 vs. 55.3+/-2.8 vs. 48.1+/-2.8; P<0.05) when compared with children with GERD and controls. Thirteen patients with EoE experienced 21 episodes of dysphagia, and all correlated with simultaneous abnormal motor function. PEMP allowed the detection of ineffective peristalsis in children with EoE. Symptoms observed in children with EoE may be related to esophageal motor dysfunction.

T1236 Apple Sauce Improves the Detection of Abnormal Esophageal Motor Function During High Resolution Manometry Evaluation of Dysphagia

T1236 Apple Sauce Improves the Detection of Abnormal Esophageal Motor Function During High Resolution Manometry Evaluation of Dysphagia

Complete fundoplication is not associated with increased dysphagia in patients with abnormal esophageal motility

Abnormal esophageal motility is a relative contraindication to complete (360-degree) fundoplication because of a purported risk of postoperative dysphagia. Partial fundoplication, however, may be associated with increased postoperative esophageal acid exposure. Our aim was to determine if complete fundoplication is associated with increased postoperative dysphagia in patients with abnormal esophageal motor function. Medical records of 140 patients (79 females; mean age 48 ± 1.1 years) who underwent fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) were reviewed retrospectively to document demographic data, symptoms, and diagnostic test results. Of the 126 patients who underwent complete fundoplication, 25 met manometric criteria for abnormal esophageal motility (≤30 mm Hg mean distal esophageal body pressure or ≤80% peristalsis), 68 had normal esophageal function, and 33 had incomplete manometric data and were therefore excluded from analysis. Of the 11 patients who underwent partial fundoplication, eight met criteria for abnormal esophageal motility, two had normal esophageal function, and one had incomplete data and was therefore excluded. After a median follow-up of 2 years (range 0.5 to 5 years), patients were asked to report heartburn, difficulty swallowing, and overall satisfaction using a standardized scoring scale. Complete responses were obtained in 72%. Sixty-five patients who underwent complete fundoplication and had manometric data available responded (46 normal manometry; 19 abnormal manometry). Outcomes were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. After complete fundoplication, similar postoperative heartburn, swallowing, and overall satisfaction were reported by patients with normal and abnormal esophageal motility. Likewise, similar outcomes were reported after partial fundoplication. This retrospective study found equally low dysphagia rates regardless of baseline esophageal motility; therefore a randomized trial comparing complete versus partial fundoplication in patients with abnormal esophageal motility is warranted.

Solid phase radionuclide esophageal motility in polymyositis and dermatomyositis.

Polymyositis (PM) and dermatomyositis (DM) may be associated with motor dysfunction of the entire gastrointestinal tract. Abnormal esophageal motor function is a well-recognized complication of these diseases. In this study, we used a solid phase esophageal study to evaluate the motor function in patients with PM or DM. Twenty-three patients and 36 age-matched normal volunteers were studied. Each subject was placed in a supine position above a gamma camera linked to a computer and was given a 4-ml bolus of solid gelatin containing 1 mCi of Tc-99m phytate. Data were acquired in the list mode. A computer method modified from Kelim and Wald and Russell et al. was used to calculate the following: A) total mean transit time (MTT); B) residual fraction after the first swallow (RF); and C) retrograde index (RI). All values are presented as mean +/- standard deviation (SD). The Student's t-test was used to test statistical significance. Our preliminary results suggest: 1) delayed esophageal emptying is common (17/23) in PM/DM, indicating frequent malfunction of the smooth muscle of the upper gastrointestinal tract in PM/DM and 2) measurement of esophageal motility may monitor disease activity in PM/DM.

Indications, technique, and clinical use of ambulatory 24-hour esophageal motility monitoring in a surgical practice.

The development of miniaturized electronic pressure transducers and portable digital data recorders with large storage capacity has made ambulatory monitoring of esophageal motor function over an entire circadian cycle possible. The broad clinical application of this new technology in a large number of asymptomatic normal volunteers and patients with primary esophageal motor disorders or gastroesophageal reflux disease provides new insights into esophageal motor function in health and disease under a variety of physiologic conditions. In normal volunteers and symptomatic patients, esophageal motor activity increases with both the state of consciousness and eating activity, i.e., from sleep to awake to meal periods. In the normal situation there is a higher prevalence of nonperistaltic esophageal contractions than appreciated on stationary manometry. Compared with standard manometry, ambulatory esophageal manometry provides a more than 100-fold larger database for the classification and quantitation of abnormal esophageal motor function and leads to a change in the diagnosis in a substantial portion of patients with symptoms suggestive of a primary esophageal motor disorder. In patients with nonobstructive dysphagia, the circadian esophageal motility pattern is characterized by an inability to organize the motor activity into peristaltic contractions during meal periods. In patients with noncardiac chest pain, ambulatory motility monitoring can document a direct correlation of abnormal esophageal motor activity with the symptom and shows that the abnormal motor activity immediately preceding the pain episodes is characterized by an increased frequency of simultaneous, double- and triple-peaked, high-amplitude, and long-duration contractions. A long esophageal myotomy can abolish the ability of the esophagus to produce this abnormal motor pattern. In patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease, ambulatory motility monitoring shows that the contractility of the esophageal body deteriorates with increasing severity of esophageal mucosal injury, compromising the clearance function of the esophageal body. These data suggest that ambulatory esophageal motility monitoring allows for a more precise classification of esophageal motor disorders than standard manometry and can identify abnormal esophageal motor pattern associated with nonobstructive dysphagia, noncardiac chest pain, or gastroesophageal reflux. Ambulatory esophageal manometry therefore should replace standard manometry in the assessment of esophageal body function and has potential to improve the diagnosis and management of patients with esophageal motor abnormalities. The combination of ambulatory 24-hour esophageal manometry with esophageal and gastric pH monitoring is currently the most physiologic way to assess patients with functional foregut disorders.

Radiologic assessment of abnormal oral and pharyngeal phases of swallowing.

Our purpose here is to review abnormalities of the first two phases of swallowing. The most frequent symptoms of abnormal oral or pharyngeal swallowing include difficulty initiating swallowing, cervical dysphagia, nasal regurgitation, coughing, and choking. Generally, abnormal oral or pharyngeal swallowing function is associated with high cervical dysphagia in the upper neck, whereas the abnormal esophageal motor function or obstructive morphology may be in the retrosternal area or lower neck

The pathogenesis of gastroesophageal reflux disease

Reflux disease is a complex process in which different factors may contribute to the final common pathway of esophageal mucosal injury. Individual patients are heterogeneous with respect to the main determinants that contribute to the development of their symptomatic condition. Gastroesophageal reflux occurs by means of several different mechanisms that vary among patients. In many patients, resting LES tone is normal and reflux occurs via transient LES relaxations. In others with a hypotensive LES, acid reflux occurs mainly as stress of free reflux. Only this latter group is likely to exhibit barium reflux during fluoroscopy. Total esophageal exposure to acid material depends on a number of factors, including the rate of reflux, volume and potency of the refluxate, and efficacy of esophageal acid clearance. Abnormal esophageal exposure to acid refluxate depends on increased gastroesophageal reflux, delayed esophageal clearance, or both. Impaired esophageal acid clearance is generally caused by abnormal esophageal motor function that generally can be detected on barium-swallow examination.

Long-term esophageal function following repair of esophageal atresia.

Primary repair of esophageal atresia restores gastrointestinal continuity, but does not ensure normal esophageal function. To date 22 patients, six to 32 (average 15) years after repair of their esophageal atresias, have been evaluated by personal interview and esophageal manometrics and acid reflux testing. Previous barium swallow examinations had demonstrated varying degrees of anastomotic narrowing (12 patients), abnormal esophageal motor function (11 patients), gastroesophageal reflux (two patients), and hiatal hernia (one patient). Ten patients experience intermittent dysphagia for solid foods. Seven have typical symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux. Esophageal function tests including manometry and intraesophageal pH recording, have demonstrated varying abnormalities of esophageal motility in 21 patients and moderate to severe gastroesophageal reflux in 13. Two patients have required reconstruction of the esophagogastric junction for control of severe reflux esophagitis. The unexpected high incidence of gastroesophageal reflux in these patients, coupled with their abnormal esophageal motility which impairs normal acid clearing, renders them more prone to reflux esophagitis. Careful long-term evaluation for gastroesophageal reflux and its complications is indicated following primary repair of esophageal atresia. Evaluation of esophageal function with intraesophageal pressure and pH recordings is a far more sensitive indicator of esophageal physiology than the barium swallow examination.