Purpose: This study evaluates whether photoacoustic (PA), sound touch elastography (STE), and viscoelasticity (VE) can distinguish between normal and abnormal post-radiotherapy breast skin and compare these methods with RTOG criteria at a 20 Gy threshold. Methods: Patients meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria underwent PA, STE, and VE on the same day. Collected data included radiation dose, molecular type, RTOG, Fitzpatrick skin type, pathology, neoadjuvant chemotherapy status, TNM classification, surgical procedures, primary breast cancer location, BMI, and age. A sample of 41 patients was determined using a two-sample t-test. Statistical tools like T-tests, variance analysis, rank sum tests, and chi-square tests, along with random forest analysis and ROC curves, were used to evaluate the radiation dose effects. Results: Data from 66 patients showed significant differences in parameters such as dermis and subcutaneous tissue oxygen saturation, dermal thickness, and skin elasticity (p-values < 0.05). However, minimum values of oxygen saturation and some photoacoustic measures were not significantly different. Notably, at a 20 Gy radiation threshold, significant variations in oxygen saturation, abnormal dermal thickness, and skin STE and VE were observed, proving more accurate than RTOG grading. Conclusion: The study confirms the effectiveness of PA and elastography imaging in differentiating normal from abnormal breast tissue and assessing radiation-induced changes, highlighting the potential of these imaging techniques.