ABL Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Research Articles

Outcome of 3q26.2/MECOM rearrangements in chronic myeloid leukemia.

To evaluate the outcomes of patients with 3q26.2/MECOM-rearranged chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). We reviewed consecutive adult patients with 3q26.2/MECOM-rearranged CML between January 1, 1998 and February 16, 2023. Rearrangements of 3q26.2/MECOM were confirmed by conventional cytogenetics, and fluorescence in situ hybridization starting in 2015. We identified 55 patients with MECOM-rearranged CML, including 23 in chronic phase (CP) or accelerated phase (AP) and 32 in blast phase (BP). Nine patients (16%) achieved a major cytogenetic response (MCyR) or deeper. At a median follow-up of 89months, median survival was 14months. The 5-year survival rate was 19% overall, 23% in CML-CP/AP, and 15% in CML-BP. In the 6-month landmark analysis, the 5-year survival rate was 41% for allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) recipients versus 17% for non-recipients (P = 0.050). Multivariate analysis showed that the percentage of marrow blasts and achievement of MCyR or deeper could predict survival. Outcomes of 3q26.2/MECOM-rearranged CML are poor despite the availability of multiple BCR::ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Third-generation TKIs in combination with novel agents and possible allo-SCT could be considered given the poor outcomes and resistance to second-generation TKIs.

Ponatinib-review of historical development, current status, and future research.

Ponatinib is a third-generation BCR::ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with high potency against Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-positive leukemias, including T315I-mutated disease, which is resistant to first- and second-generation TKIs. Ponatinib was approved for T315I-mutated chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), CML resistant/intolerant to ≥2 prior TKIs, advanced phase CML and Ph-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) where no other TKIs are indicated, and T315I-mutated CML and Ph-positive ALL. The response-based dosing of ponatinib in chronic phase CML (CP-CML) improved treatment tolerance and reduced the risk of toxicities, including cardiovascular risks. Ponatinib-based therapy also resulted in significantly better outcomes in frontline Ph-positive ALL compared with prior TKIs and is becoming a new standard of care in this setting. As the clinical development of third-generation TKIs and their rational combinations progresses, we envision further transformative changes in the treatment of CML and Ph-positive ALL.

Ponatinib vs Imatinib in Frontline Philadelphia Chromosome–Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

In newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), disease progression due to acquired resistance to first- or second-generation BCR::ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors is common. Ponatinib inhibits BCR::ABL1 and all single-mutation variants, including T315I. To compare frontline ponatinib vs imatinib in adults with newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL. Global registrational, phase 3, open-label trial in adults aged 18 years or older with newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL. From January 2019 to May 2022, eligible patients at 77 sites were randomized 2:1 to ponatinib (30 mg/d) or imatinib (600 mg/d) with reduced-intensity chemotherapy, followed by single-agent ponatinib or imatinib after the cycle 20 phase of the trial. The last date of follow-up for this analysis was August 12, 2022. Patients received ponatinib, 30 mg/d, or imatinib, 600 mg/d, with reduced-intensity chemotherapy, followed by single-agent ponatinib or imatinib after cycle 20. The ponatinib dose was reduced to 15 mg on achievement of minimal residual disease-(MRD) negative complete remission. The primary end point of this interim analysis was MRD-negative complete remission (≤0.01% BCR::ABL1 [MR4] centrally assessed by reverse transcriptase-quantitative polymerase chain reaction), with complete remission maintained for at least 4 weeks at the end of cycle 3. The key secondary end point was event-free survival. Of 245 patients randomized (median age, 54 years; 133 [54.3%] female), 232 (ponatinib, n = 154; imatinib, n = 78) who had p190 or p210 dominant isoforms verified by the central laboratory were analyzed for the primary end point. The MRD-negative complete remission rate (primary end point) was significantly higher with ponatinib (34.4% [53/154]) vs imatinib (16.7% [13/78]) (risk difference, 0.18 [95% CI, 0.06-0.29]; P = .002). At the data cutoff, event-free survival had not met the prespecified number of events. Median event-free survival was not reached in the ponatinib group and was 29 months in the imatinib group. The most common adverse events were similar between treatment groups. Arterial occlusive events were infrequent and comparable between groups (ponatinib, 2.5%; imatinib, 1.2%). Ponatinib demonstrated a superior rate of MRD-negative complete remission at the end of induction vs imatinib when combined with reduced-intensity chemotherapy in adults with newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL. The safety profile of ponatinib was comparable with imatinib. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03589326.

Combination of an aurora kinase inhibitor and the ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitor asciminib against ABL inhibitor-resistant CML cells

The development of BCR::ABL1-targeting tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has improved the prognosis of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). However, resistance to ABL TKIs can develop in CML patients due to BCR::ABL1 point mutations and CML leukemia stem cell (LSC). Aurora kinases are essential kinases for cell division and regulate mitosis, especially the process of chromosomal segregation. Aurora kinase members also promote cancer cell survival and proliferation. This study analyzed whether aurora kinases were regulated in the progression of CML. It also evaluated the efficacy of the ABL TKI asciminib and the aurora kinase inhibitor LY3295668. The expressions of AURKA and AURKB were higher in the CML cells compared with normal cells using a public database (GSE100026). Asciminib or LY3295668 alone inhibited CML cells after 72 h, and cellular cytotoxicity was increased. The combined use of Asciminib and LY3295668 increased superior efficacy compared with either drug alone. Colony formation was reduced by cotreatment with asciminib and LY3295668. In the cell-cycle analyses, LY3295668 induced G2/M arrest. Cell populations in the sub-G1 phase were observed when cotreating with asciminib and LY3295668. The combination treatment also changed the mitochondrial membrane potential. In addition, AURKA shRNA transfectant cells had increased asciminib sensitivity. Combining asciminib and aurora kinase inhibition enhanced the efficacy and is proposed as a new therapeutic option for patients with CML. These findings have clinical implications for a potential novel therapeutic strategy for CML patients.

Clinical Insights into Structure, Regulation, and Targeting of ABL Kinases in Human Leukemia.

Chronic myeloid leukemia is a multistep, multi-lineage myeloproliferative disease that originates from a translocation event between chromosome 9 and chromosome 22 within the hematopoietic stem cell compartment. The resultant fusion protein BCR::ABL1 is a constitutively active tyrosine kinase that can phosphorylate multiple downstream signaling molecules to promote cellular survival and inhibit apoptosis. Currently, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), which impair ABL1 kinase activity by preventing ATP entry, are widely used as a successful therapeutic in CML treatment. However, disease relapses and the emergence of resistant clones have become a critical issue for CML therapeutics. Two main reasons behind the persisting obstacles to treatment are the acquired mutations in the ABL1 kinase domain and the presence of quiescent CML leukemia stem cells (LSCs) in the bone marrow, both of which can confer resistance to TKI therapy. In this article, we systemically review the structural and molecular properties of the critical domains of BCR::ABL1 and how understanding the essential role of BCR::ABL1 kinase activity has provided a solid foundation for the successful development of molecularly targeted therapy in CML. Comparison of responses and resistance to multiple BCR::ABL1 TKIs in clinical studies and current combination treatment strategies are also extensively discussed in this article.

Результаты применения асциминиба, первого аллостерического ингибитора BCR::ABL1-тирозинкиназы, у больных хроническим миелолейкозом со множественной резистентностью к предшествующей терапии

Currently, there is a crucial need for new treatment approaches to overcome the resistance and intolerance of several tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy lines in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients. Asciminib, the first in its class BCR::ABL1-tyrosine kinase inhibitor specifically targeting ABL myristoyl pocket (STAMP), demonstrated efficacy and safety in CML patients with prior TKI therapy failure, including the cases with pan-resistant T315I mutation in the chimeric BCR::ABL1 gene. The present review focuses on the asciminib mechanism of action, the results of both preclinical and clinical phase I and III studies. Due to the favorable cardiovascular toxicity profile of asciminib, the scope of its application can be extended to patients with cardiovascular co-morbidities. Asciminib is registered in the Russian Federation in January 2023, so treatment algorithms for CML patients with ineffectiveness or intolerance of prior therapy should be updated in line with this new option.

Navigating the Management of Chronic Phase CML in the Era of Generic BCR::ABL1 Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors.

Over the past several years, advances in research, treatment, and market dynamics have impacted treatment strategies in chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP). They include the broader availability of cost-effective generic imatinib, and soon other generic second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Access to affordable generics means that all patients with CML-CP should have access to safe and highly effective lifelong therapies. When overall survival is the treatment endpoint, imatinib provides a good treatment value. Second-generation TKIs may be the best frontline strategy when treatment-free remission is the goal. Recent studies have shown maintained efficacy and reduced toxicity when TKIs are used at reduced dosing. Reduced-dose schedules of second-generation TKIs (which are less toxic and induce faster deep molecular responses) may render generic second-generation TKIs a more attractive treatment option. Adjusting the dose of TKI in the presence of mild-to-moderate, or even severe but reversible, adverse events may be preferable to switching to a different TKI. The selection of second-line and beyond therapies depends on the evolving patterns observed with frontline treatment. Dose-adjusted ponatinib schedules have demonstrated improved efficacy and safety in patients resistant to second-generation TKIs or those with T315I-mutated disease. For asciminib, longer-term follow-up is needed to better evaluate its safety and efficacy compared with ponatinib. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation represents a valid alternative to newer-generation TKIs, with a better treatment value when TKIs are priced at >$40,000/year.

BCR-ABL Kinase Domain Mutations in CML patients, Experience from a tertiary care center in North India.

Background: Chronic Myeloid Leukemia is characterized by the presence of the Philadelphia Chromosome (Ph) which contains the BCR::ABL1 fusion gene that occurs due to a reciprocal translocation between chromosomes 9 and 22. This accounts for up to 15% of all adult leukemias [1]. Most patients treated with first line tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) imatinib achieve durable response but may undergo relapse at some stage [2]. The most important mechanism that may confer imatinib resistance is point mutation within BCR::ABL kinase domain. Other generation ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as dasatinib, nilotinib, bosutinib and ponatinib help to overcome imatinib resistance [3]. Sensitivity of the patient to each of the above TKIs depends upon the individual candidate mutation present. Thus, it is important to perform mutation analysis for effective therapeutic management of CML patients once they show imatinib resistance. We used direct sequencing to identify the different types of mutations responsible for resistance of imatinib treatment from north India. Methods: In this study, the patient resistance for the imatinib were analyzed for BCR::ABL kinase domain mutation by direct sequencing and the detected mutations along with their percentage prevalence were reported. Results: 329 patients with CML-CP were analyzed for BCR::ABL kinase domain mutation. Total 66 (20.06%) patients out of 329 had mutation in at least one of the domains of BCR::ABL conferring resistance to different generations of TKI. Mutations in BCR::ABL kinase domain was observed in different domain of BCR::ABL. ATP binding P-Loop (42.42%), Direct binding site (36.36%), C-Loop (10.60%), A-Loop (6.06%), SH2 contact (3.03%), SH3 contact (1.51%). Conclusion: Total 20.06% patients (66/329) show mutation in at least one of the structural motifs of BCR-ABL kinase domain, which further confer the resistance to a particular generation of TKI.

Overcoming BCR::ABL1 dependent and independent survival mechanisms in chronic myeloid leukaemia using a multi-kinase targeting approach

BackgroundDespite improved patient outcome using tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) patients require life-long treatment due to leukaemic stem cell (LSC) persistence. LSCs reside in the bone marrow (BM) niche, which they modify to their advantage. The BM provides oncogene-independent signals to aid LSC cell survival and quiescence. The bone-morphogenetic pathway (BMP) is one pathway identified to be highly deregulated in CML, with high levels of BMP ligands detected in the BM, accompanied by CML stem and progenitor cells overexpressing BMP type 1 receptors- activin-like kinases (ALKs), especially in TKI resistant patients. Saracatinib (SC), a SRC/ABL1 dual inhibitor, inhibits the growth of CML cells resistant to the TKI imatinib (IM). Recent studies indicate that SC is also a potent ALK inhibitor and BMP antagonist. Here we investigate the efficacy of SC in overcoming CML BCR::ABL1 dependent and independent signals mediated by the BM niche both in 2D and 3D culture.MethodsCML cells (K562 cell line and CML CD34+ primary cells) were treated with single or combination treatments of: IM, SC and the BMP receptors inhibitor dorsomorphin (DOR), with or without BMP4 stimulation in 2D (suspension) and 3D co-culture on HS5 stroma cell line and mesenchymal stem cells in AggreWell and microfluidic devices. Flow cytometry was performed to investigate apoptosis, cell cycle progression and proliferation, alongside colony assays following treatment. Proteins changes were validated by immunoblotting and transcriptional changes by Fluidigm multiplex qPCR.ResultsBy targeting the BMP pathway, using specific inhibitors against ALKs in combination with SRC and ABL TKIs, we show an increase in apoptosis, altered cell cycle regulation, fewer cell divisions, and reduced numbers of CD34+ cells. Impairment of long-term proliferation and differentiation potential after combinatorial treatment also occurred.ConclusionBMP signalling pathway is important for CML cell survival. Targeting SRC, ABL and ALK kinases is more effective than ABL inhibition alone, the combination efficacy importantly being demonstrated in both 2D and 3D cell cultures highlighting the need for combinatorial therapies in contrast to standard of care single agents. Our study provides justification to target multiple kinases in CML to combat LSC persistence.

Highly Sensitive Chip-Based Digital PCR Platform for Quantitative Detection of BCR::ABL1 Transcripts throughout CML Treatment

Introduction: With various BCR::ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has become a manageable disease and current therapeutic goal is treatment-free remission (TFR). To achieve a successful TFR in more patients, a precise assessment of minimal residual disease (MRD) is one of the prerequisite requirements. Since undetectable BCR::ABL1 fusion transcripts by conventional Taqman™-based quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) is not an indicator for complete eradication of the CML clone, it requires the development of more sensitive technologies. Currently, to overcome some limitations of conventional qPCR, such as rigorous standardization process and variations in sensitivity between laboratories, digital quantitative-PCR (dqPCR) methods have been developed for accurate and precise detection and its use in the routine clinical practice is gradually expanding. However, current dqPCR methods require the inclusion of one or more negative partitions to calculate the concentration using Poisson distribution. Consequently, this leads to a more than a 10-fold decrease in the maximum detectable concentration in a single test compared to conventional qPCR. Therefore, we have developed a novel technology, High Dynamic Range Digital Real-time PCR (so called HDR-drPCR) to achieve wider dynamic range, which allows more stable, accurate and sensitive monitoring of BCR::ABL1 in a timely manner. Methods: For linearity assessment, we used BCR::ABL1 positive (e14a2) K562 cell line diluted to 7 points by 10-fold serial dilutions from 25 to 2.5x10 -5 %IS with BCR::ABL1 negative HL60 cells. In HDR-drPCR, the GUSB gene was employed as a control gene to determine %IS values. For this purpose, the 1 st WHO international genetic reference panel was utilized to calculate the correction factor (CF). With the results from cell lines, we also evaluated equivalence between conventional qPCR and HDR-drPCR using 219 clinical specimens. Among them, 100 samples were determined as DMR (<0.01%IS) based on the qPCR test results In detail, conventional qPCR was performed using Transcriptor First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Roche, USA) for cDNA synthesis and Real-Q BCR-ABL Quantification Kit (Biosewoom, South Korea) for qPCR. For HDR-drPCR (1-step reverse transcriptase PCR), 10 6 to 10 7 copies per reaction of GUSB gene were applied to disposable cartridges of Genotizer™ HDR BCR::ABL1 Major IS detection kit (Optolane Technologies, South Korea) with LOAA platform (Optolane Technologies, Korea). Based on the results, correlation analysis between qPCR and HDR-drPCR was performed using correlation graphs and Blend-Altman plots. Results: Linearity was assessed by the dilution of RNA of K562 with RNA of HL60 using 10-fold serial dilution of up to - 7 log. The result showed accurate linearity (R 2 = 0.9972) at the range of BCR::ABL1/GUSB ratio of 10 1 to 10 -5(%). Notably, HDR-drPCR technology allowed to detect the level of BCR::ABL1 transcript of MR 6.34 (0.00005 %IS) (Figure 1A). The correlation analysis for 209 clinical samples showed that measured values from both qPCR and HDR-drPCR were closely correlated with the R 2 of 0.973 1 (Figure 1B) . The Bland-Altman plot showed a mean bias of 0.159, and the limit of agreement at the 95% confidence interval (LOA95) was calculated as -0.387 to 0.705. Furthermore, the concordance rate between the two methods was 96.17%, as measured by the proportion of samples in which the difference between the two methods was within a factor of 5. This indicates a strong concordance between the two methods. HDR-drPCR reliably detected BCR::ABL1 transcripts in all 90 clinical specimens measured below 0.01%IS (DMR) using qPCR. Additionally, HDR-drPCR detected trace amounts of BCR::ABL1 transcripts in 6 out of 10 specimens that were not detected by qPCR, showcasing its improved sensitivity compared to the conventional qPCR method. Conclusion: Taken together, we believe our high dynamic range real-time digital PCR(HDR-drPCR) may minimize false positive results and maximize the analytical sensitivity of detecting BCR::ABL1 fusion transcripts and thus, would be useful for accurately assessing treatment in routine clinical practice and facilitating the application of treatment-free remission (TFR). We will include these results in further intensive studies focusing on DMR clinical specimens Study support: Funded by Korea Research Foundation

Ponatinib Versus Imatinib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Ph+ ALL: Subgroup Analysis of the Phase 3 Phallcon Study

Background: BCR::ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in combination with chemotherapy or steroids remain the standard of care in patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Most patients treated with first- or second-generation TKIs eventually experience disease progression due to treatment resistance. Ponatinib is the only currently approved pan-BCR::ABL1 inhibitory TKI that potently inhibits wild-type and single resistance mutation variants of BCR::ABL1, including T315I. Multiple studies have shown promising minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity (neg) rates and survival outcomes with ponatinib in combination with chemotherapy or chemotherapy-free regimens. PhALLCON (NCT03589326) is the first randomized study comparing frontline TKIs in adults with Ph+ ALL. The primary endpoint for PhALLCON was met, with a clinically significantly higher MRD-neg complete remission (CR) rate at end of induction (EOI) with ponatinib vs imatinib (34.4% vs 16.7%; risk difference: 0.18 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.06‒0.29]; P=0.0021) and a manageable safety profile comparable with imatinib. Here we report subgroup efficacy analyses from PhALLCON. Methods: This global, registrational, phase 3, open-label study randomized newly diagnosed adult patients with Ph+ ALL 2:1 to receive ponatinib (30 mg once daily [QD]) or imatinib (600 mg QD) plus reduced-intensity chemotherapy through EOI (Cycles 1-3), consolidation (Cycles 4-9), and post-consolidation (Cycles 10-20). Following post-consolidation, patients continued to receive single-agent ponatinib or imatinib until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The composite primary endpoint was MRD-neg ( BCR:: ABL1 ≤0.01% [MR4])CR for 4 weeks at EOI. Event-free survival (EFS; any-cause death, failure to achieve CR by EOI, relapse from CR) was a key secondary endpoint. A post-hoc analysis of progression-free survival (PFS; EFS-defined events, failure to achieve MRD-neg by the end of treatment, and loss of MRD-neg) was conducted. Subgroup analyses were performed relative to baseline demographic and disease characteristics. Results: Of 245 randomized patients, 232 (ponatinib, n=154; imatinib, n=78) had baseline BCR::ABL1 p190/p210 variants verified by central lab (efficacy-evaluable population); median age was 54 years (37.1% ≥60 years). As of Aug 2022, 78 patients (ponatinib/imatinib: 68 [41.5%]/10 [12.3%]) remained on study treatment; the top 3 reasons for discontinuation were hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT; 30.5%/37.0%), adverse events (12.2%/12.3%), and lack of efficacy (7.3%/25.9%). Median follow-up in the ponatinib and imatinib arms was 20 months and 18 months, respectively. Benefit for ponatinib was observed across all subgroups analyzed ( Table). All age subgroups had higher rates of MRD-neg CR with ponatinib vs imatinib, with the greatest benefit observed in patients ≥60 years (40.0% ponatinib vs 10.3% imatinib; P=0.0005). MRD-neg CR rate was higher for ponatinib vs imatinib among those with the BCR::ABL1 p190 variant (38.6%/17.0%; P=0.0017); it was higher for the p210 variant as well, but not significantly (22.5% vs 16.0%; P=0.51). Median PFS was longer with ponatinib vs imatinib regardless of age, with the greatest difference observed in the subgroup of patients ≥60 years (22.5 months for ponatinib vs 8.3 months for imatinib; hazard ratio: 0.594 [95% CI: 0.332-1.063]). Conclusions: Ponatinib was superior to imatinib in combination with reduced-intensity chemotherapy in the front-line setting for patients with Ph+ ALL, with a clinically significantly higher MRD-neg CR rate at EOI. Benefit was observed across all subgroups, particularly for patients ≥60 years and for those with the BCR::ABL1 p190 variant.

Improvement of Treatment-Free Remission Rate Following Discontinuation of BCR::ABL1 Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Chronic Phase, Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

Backgrounds: Several studies have shown that approximately one-half of patients with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML) who receive sufficient tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and achieve and maintain a deep molecular response (DMR) are able to successfully discontinue therapy. The main factors affecting Treatment free remission (TFR) are the duration of TKIs treatment and the duration of DMR maintenance during TKI treatment. Aims: To investigate impact of longer duration of DMR, we analyzed the outcome of patients with CP-CML who maintained DMR for more than 6 years during TKIs treatment and discontinued TKIs. The clinical and molecular immunological application criteria were also investigated for safer and more successful TFR. Methods: Among patients newly diagnosed with CP-CML and treated at least one of TKIs (Imatinib, Nilotinib, Dasatinib, Bosutinib, and Radotinib) as the first treatment, patients who maintained MR4.5 (BCR::ABL1 IS ≤0.0032%) continuously for at least 6 years through qRT-PCR tests were enrolled in this study. After discontinuation, molecular responses were monitored for up to six months per month, up to 12 months every two months, and every three months thereafter using the qRT-PCR method. In the case of relapse, defined as loss of major molecular response (MMR), the last TKI therapy was reintroduced and molecular responses after resumption were monitored monthly until achievement of MMR using qRT-PCR. Results: Altogether 116 patients (50 males and 66 females) discontinued TKI. Median age at diagnosis was 43.0 years (range, 40.8-45.3) and the percentages of patients with low, intermediate and high Sokal risk scores ware 58 (50.0%), 35 (30.2%) and 18 (15.5%) patients, respectively with unknown Sokal risk scores in 5 (4.3%) patients. Prior to discontinuation, all patients received TKIs for a median of 120.6 months (range, 113.9-127.3), and the duration of sustained MR4.5 was 75.0 months (range, 70.7-79.3). At the time of discontinuation, 93 patients (80.2%) were receiving their first TKI (70 imatinib, 13 nilotinib, 6 radotinib, and 4 dasatinib) while 13 (11.2 %) and 10 (8.6%) patients were receiving their second and more than three TKIs respectively. All patients who received more than one TKI had changed to adverse events. After a median follow-up from treatment discontinuation of 42.2 months (range, 35.3-49.1), 28 (24.1%) patients have lost their response at a median of 8.4 months (range, 4.9-11.9) after discontinuation; 18 (64.3%) patients had molecular relapse within 6 months of TKI discontinuation and 7 (25.0%) patients lost MMR after 12 months from discontinuation. TFR rates at 12, 24, and 48 months were 81.9%, 76.0%, and 71.0%, respectively. No progression toward advanced-phase CML occurred, and when 28 patients who lost MMR were retreated with same TKI, 26 patients (92.9%) re-achieved MMR with a median of 5.6 months (range, 4.0-7.2). By univariate analysis, a TKI treatment duration of 10 years or more was the only significant predictor for maintained response (P<0.048). Conclusion: Our result demonstrates that TFR rate can be improved in patients who received TKI treatment for approximately 10 years and maintained DMR for more than 6 years regardless of the type of TKI. Based on results, we can confirm one of important factors for safer TFR in CP-CML patients.

Update of Olverembatinib (HQP1351) Overcoming Ponatinib and/or Asciminib Resistance in Patients (Pts) with Heavily Pretreated/Refractory Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) and Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (Ph + ALL)

Background Olverembatinib, a novel, potent BCR::ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), shows strong antitumor activity in pts with CML and Ph + ALL. Here, we report on the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles of olverembatinib in pts with CML (all phases) and Ph + ALL outside of China, particularly in pts previously treated with ponatinib and/or asciminib. Methods Olverembatinib was administered orally once every other day (QOD) in continuous 28-day cycles. In the monotherapy cohort, pts were enrolled after treatment failure on at least 2 prior TKIs and randomized to olverembatinib QOD 30, 40, or 50 mg. In the combination cohort, pts with Ph + B-cell precursor (BCP) ALL or lymphoid CML-BP (CML-LBP) resistant to at least 1 TKI were enrolled and received olverembatinib (30 or 40 mg) QOD in combination with blinatumomab. Results As of June 30, 2023, 76 pts were enrolled, including 57 with CML-CP and 19 with advanced Ph + leukemia. The median (range) age was 54.5 (21-80) years, and 56.6% of pts were male. In all, 11 (14.5%), 23 (30.3%), and 39 (51.3%) pts had received 2, 3, and ≥ 4 prior TKIs, respectively. A total of 52.6% of pts were previously treated with ponatinib, of whom 67.5% were resistant and 25.0% intolerant to the drug, and 7.5% experienced treatment failure for other reasons. A total of 27.6% of pts were previously treated with asciminib, of whom 71.4% were resistant and 19.1% intolerant to the agent, and 9.5% experienced treatment failure for other reasons. At baseline, 32% of pts had T315I mutations, 38% hypertension, and 17.1% other cardiovascular comorbidities. Median (range) treatment duration was 24.1 (0-134) weeks, and PK profiles were similar to historical PK data on Chinese pts. Twelve pts with CML-CP and 7 with advanced Ph + leukemia discontinued treatment: 4 because of AEs, 7 disease progression, and 8 other reasons. A total of 54 of 65 (83.1%) pts who received ≥ 1 dose of olverembatinib experienced any-grade TRAEs. Grade ≥ 3 AEs occurring in ≥ 3 pts (≥ 4.6% incidence) included thrombocytopenia (17%); neutropenia (13.8%); elevated blood creatine phosphokinase (13.8%); leukopenia (7.7%); and anemia and elevated lipase (4.6% each). Ten (15.4%) pts experienced olverembatinib treatment-related serious AEs, of which each were experienced by 1 (1.5%) pt. Two (3.1%) pts discontinued the study because of TRAEs. No TRAE-associated deaths were reported. Olverembatinib showed sustained antileukemic activity in pts with CML and Ph + ALL (Table 1). Among 50 efficacy-evaluable pts with CML-CP, the rate of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) was 57% (25/44) and major molecular response (MMR) 43% (21/49). Efficacy improved over time; the MMR rate in pts with CML-CP treated for 6 months was 66% and 88% in pts treated for 12 months. Among pts whose disease failed ≥ 4 prior TKIs, CCyR and MMR rates were 57% (13/23) and 42% (11/26), respectively. In pts with CML-CP harboring the T315I mutation, rates of CCyR and MMR were 60% (9/15) and 44% (7/16), respectively, and 55% (16/29) and 42% (14/33) in pts without the T315I mutation. Among evaluable ponatinib-failed pts, 8/15 (53%) achieved CCyR and 6/16 (38%) MMR. Among pts who failed asciminib therapy, 3/7 (43%) achieved CCyR and 3/8 (38%) MMR. Of 8 pts with CML-CP who had prior exposure to both ponatinib and asciminib, 2 (25%) achieved MMR. At 24 months, PFS was 75% (95% CI, 56.1-86.7) and OS was 97.6% (95% CI, 90.8-99.4). Thirteen pts with advanced Ph + leukemia were efficacy-evaluable, of whom 3 (23%) achieved MMR; only 1 of 3 pts with the T315I mutation achieved MMR; the other 2 were also resistant to ponatinib treatment. The median (95% CI) PFS of efficacy-evaluable pts with advanced leukemia was 12.7 (4-19.5) months. In the combination cohort, 2 pts with Ph + BCP ALL received olverembatinib 30 mg QOD with blinatumomab; both achieved CCyR and 1 achieved a negative MRD status after 1 treatment cycle. Conclusions Olverembatinib alone or combined with blinatumomab was efficacious and well tolerated in pts with heavily pretreated CML or Ph + ALL . Olverembatinib monotherapy was potent in pts who were either resistant or intolerant to ponatinib and/or asciminib, regardless of T315I mutation status. Olverembatinib may provide an effective new treatment option for pts after failure of 2 or more TKIs. Internal study identifier: HQP1351-CU101. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04260022.

Lower-Initiating Dose of Bosutinib for Resistant or Intolerant to Prior Therapy Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients (BOGI trial): A Single-Arm, Multicenter, Phase II Trial

Introduction: The introduction of ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has markedly improved the survival outcomes in patients with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP). Second-generation TKIs are highly active for patients with newly diagnosed and resistant/intolerant CML-CP. Although bosutinib is generally safe, drug-related toxicities (DRTs) such as diarrhea or increased transaminase leading to treatment discontinuation, are often observed. The standard initial daily dosage of bosutinib is 400 mg for newly diagnosed or 500 mg for resistant/intolerant patients with CML-CP, whereas some experts suggest lower dose (200-300 mg) initiation is recommended to reduce adverse events (AEs). However, the safety and efficacy of lower dose initiation of bosutinib are unknown. Hence, we conducted a phase 2 study of BOsutinib Gradual Increase as a second/third-line treatment for CML-CP (BOGI trial, UMIN 000032282) to clarify whether a lower initiating dose of bosutinib (200 mg daily) would reduce discontinuation or interruption of treatment due to DRTs. Patients and methods We included CML patients who developed at least one line of treatment failure (resistant or intolerant), aged >18 years with an ECOG performance status of 0-2 and adequate organ function. After enrollment, the patients initiated 200 mg of bosutinib daily; subsequently, dose escalation was performed by 100 mg daily (up to 500 mg daily) every 2 weeks if no grade 3 or higher AEs occurred. BCR::ABL1 mRNA levels were measured by the standardized international scale at a central laboratory at 3, 6, 9, and 12 month since treatment initiation. The primary endpoint was the treatment discontinuation rate due to DRTs at 12 months. Secondary endpoints included the treatment interruption rate, mean bosutinib dosage, dosing days and relative dose intensity until 12 months, achievement of cytogenetic response (CCyR), cumulative rates of major molecular response (MMR) or deep molecular response (DMR). Sample size calculation was performed by research and biostatistics SWOG statistical tools (at null proportion = 0.32, alternative proportion = 0.14, one-sided α error = 5% and β error = 20%, power 80%) with the discontinuation rate of the previous Japanese phase 1/2 study of bosutinib as a reference (Nakaseko C, et al. Int J Hematol. 2015). Considering protocol deviations, sample size was 35 participants. Results Between Feb 4, 2019, and May 24, 2022, 35 patients enrolled from four Japanese hospitals. The median age was 61 years (range, 26 - 81 years); 19 patients were male and 16 were female and 16, 12, and 7 patients had low,intermediate, and high Sokal scores, respectively. Ten patients had hypertension, five had diabetes millitus, three had chronic heart disease, two had solid tumor, and one had cerebrovascular disease, respectively. Numbers of patients with previous TKIs were one for 19 (54%), two for 12 (34%) and three for 4 (11%), respectively and prior TKIs are imatinib (8, 23%), dasatinib (27, 77%), nilotinib (16, 46%) and bosutinib (1, 3%), respectively. In the intention to treat population, the bosutinib discontinuation rate at 12 months was 25.7% (95% CI, 15.6-39.3%) which is significantly lower than that of the previous report (v.s. 43.0%, p=0.019). Similarly, bosutinib discontinuation rate due to DRTs was 11.4% (95% CI, 5.2 - 23.2%), which is also significantly lower (v.s. 32%, p = 0.005). These results suggest lower initiating dose of bosutinib reduced bosutinib discontinuation rate due to DRTs, thus the primary endpoint was met. A total of 22 patients (62.9%) interrupted bosutinib at least once. Median bosutinib dosage, bosutinib dosing days and relative dose intensity until 12 months were 391.7 (204.9-477.3) mg/day, 351.0 (20-365) days and 78% (41-95), respectively. 28 patients (80.0%) achieved cytogenetic response (CCyR) at 6 months; cumulative incidence of MMR and DMR at 12 months were 23 (65.7%; 95%CI, 49.2-79.2%) and 15 (42.9%; 95%CI, 28.0-59.1%), indicating these secondary endpoints were comparable with the previous report. Grade 3 to 4 transaminase elevation was 20% which is comparable with the previous report (v.s. 29%, p=0.427), while a lower rate of diarrhea (3%; v.s. 25%, p=0.009) was notable. Conclusion The lower initiating dose followed by a gradual dose increase of bosutinib reduced the drug discontinuation rate due to severe DRTs, especially diarrhea, while efficacy was assured.

Targeting FLT3-TAZ signaling to suppress drug resistance in blast phase chronic myeloid leukemia

BackgroundAlthough the development of BCR::ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) rendered chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) a manageable condition, acquisition of drug resistance during blast phase (BP) progression remains a critical challenge. Here, we reposition FLT3, one of the most frequently mutated drivers of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), as a prognostic marker and therapeutic target of BP-CML.MethodsWe generated FLT3 expressing BCR::ABL1 TKI-resistant CML cells and enrolled phase-specific CML patient cohort to obtain unpaired and paired serial specimens and verify the role of FLT3 signaling in BP-CML patients. We performed multi-omics approaches in animal and patient studies to demonstrate the clinical feasibility of FLT3 as a viable target of BP-CML by establishing the (1) molecular mechanisms of FLT3-driven drug resistance, (2) diagnostic methods of FLT3 protein expression and localization, (3) association between FLT3 signaling and CML prognosis, and (4) therapeutic strategies to tackle FLT3+ CML patients.ResultsWe reposition the significance of FLT3 in the acquisition of drug resistance in BP-CML, thereby, newly classify a FLT3+ BP-CML subgroup. Mechanistically, FLT3 expression in CML cells activated the FLT3-JAK-STAT3-TAZ-TEAD-CD36 signaling pathway, which conferred resistance to a wide range of BCR::ABL1 TKIs that was independent of recurrent BCR::ABL1 mutations. Notably, FLT3+ BP-CML patients had significantly less favorable prognosis than FLT3− patients. Remarkably, we demonstrate that repurposing FLT3 inhibitors combined with BCR::ABL1 targeted therapies or the single treatment with ponatinib alone can overcome drug resistance and promote BP-CML cell death in patient-derived FLT3+ BCR::ABL1 cells and mouse xenograft models.ConclusionHere, we reposition FLT3 as a critical determinant of CML progression via FLT3-JAK-STAT3-TAZ-TEAD-CD36 signaling pathway that promotes TKI resistance and predicts worse prognosis in BP-CML patients. Our findings open novel therapeutic opportunities that exploit the undescribed link between distinct types of malignancies.Graphical

A Combination of Alectinib and DNA-Demethylating Agents Synergistically Inhibits Anaplastic-Lymphoma-Kinase-Positive Anaplastic Large-Cell Lymphoma Cell Proliferation.

The recent evolution of molecular targeted therapy has improved clinical outcomes in several human malignancies. The translocation of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) was originally identified in anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALCL) and subsequently in non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). Since ALK fusion gene products act as a driver of carcinogenesis in both ALCL and NSCLC, several ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been developed. Crizotinib and alectinib are first- and second-generation ALK TKIs, respectively, approved for the treatment of ALK-positive ALCL (ALK+ ALCL) and ALK+ NSCLC. Although most ALK+ NSCLC patients respond to crizotinib and alectinib, they generally relapse after several years of treatment. We previously found that DNA-demethylating agents enhanced the efficacy of ABL TKIs in chronic myeloid leukemia cells. Moreover, aberrant DNA methylation has also been observed in ALCL cells. Thus, to improve the clinical outcomes of ALK+ ALCL therapy, we investigated the synergistic efficacy of the combination of alectinib and the DNA-demethylating agent azacytidine, decitabine, or OR-2100 (an orally bioavailable decitabine derivative). As expected, the combination of alectinib and DNA-demethylating agents synergistically suppressed ALK+ ALCL cell proliferation, concomitant with DNA hypomethylation and a reduction in STAT3 (a downstream target of ALK fusion proteins) phosphorylation. The combination of alectinib and OR-2100 markedly altered gene expression in ALCL cells, including that of genes implicated in apoptotic signaling, which possibly contributed to the synergistic anti-ALCL effects of this drug combination. Therefore, alectinib and OR-2100 combination therapy has the potential to improve the outcomes of patients with ALK+ ALCL.

Outcome of Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia in the United States since the introduction of imatinib therapy-The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, 2000-2019.

Since the introduction of BCR::ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in 2000, the treatment of Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-positive chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has improved significantly. This study aimed to evaluate Ph-positive CML outcomes in the TKI therapy era, considering factors like age, ethnicity, and income. Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, 2857 patients with Ph-positive CML diagnosed from 2000 to 2019 were analyzed. The overall 5-year survival rates in Ph-positive CML increased to above 80%, compared with pre-TKIs historical data reporting 5-year overall survival (OS) rates of less than 50%. The 5-year OS rate was 73% for patients diagnosed in 2000-2004, 82% in 2005-2009, and 78% in 2010-2014; the 4-year OS rate was 83% in 2015-2019. The 5-year OS rate for younger patients (<60years old) was 88% in 2000-2009 and 90% in 2010-2019 (p value .426). In older patients (60+ years old), the 5-year OS rates were 64% and 65%, respectively (p value, .303). Lower household income was associated with inferior survival across the 2000-2019. These results are inferior to European studies where TKIs are universally available and affordable, and relative OS in CML is similar to age-matched normal populations. Although the outcome of Ph-positive CML has improved significantly since 2000, the SEER data still shows differences in outcomes among patient subsets, some anticipated (worse OS in older patients accounted by the relative OS), but others that suggest less than universal access and affordability of this therapy (among poorer patients) in the United States.

Effect of asciminib and vitamin K2 on Abelson tyrosine-kinase-inhibitor-resistant chronic myelogenous leukemia cells

BackgroundAbelson (ABL) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are effective against chronic myeloid leukemia (CML); however, many patients develop resistance during ABL TKI therapy. Vitamin K2 (VK2) is a crucial fat-soluble vitamin used to activate hepatic coagulation factors and treat osteoporosis. Although VK2 has demonstrated impressive anticancer activity in various cancer cell lines, it is not known whether VK2 enhances the effects of asciminib, which specifically targets the ABL myristoyl pocket (STAMP) inhibitor.MethodIn this work, we investigated whether VK2 contributed to the development of CML cell lines. We also investigated the efficacy of asciminib and VK2 by using K562, ponatinib-resistant K562 (K562 PR), Ba/F3 BCR–ABL, and T315I point mutant Ba/F3 (Ba/F3 T315I) cells.ResultsBased on data from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database, gamma-glutamyl carboxylase (GGCX) and vitamin K epoxide reductase complex subunit 1 (VKORC1) were elevated in imatinib-resistant patients (GSE130404). UBIA Prenyltransferase Domain Containing 1 (UBIAD1) was decreased, and K562 PR cells were resistant to ponatinib. In contrast, asciminib inhibited CML cells and ponatinib resistance in a dose-dependent manner. CML cells were suppressed by VK2. Caspase 3/7 activity was also elevated, as was cellular cytotoxicity. Asciminib plus VK2 therapy induced a significantly higher level of cytotoxicity than use of each drug alone. Asciminib and VK2 therapy altered the mitochondrial membrane potential.ConclusionsAsciminib and VK2 are suggested as a novel treatment for ABL-TKI-resistant cells since they increase treatment efficacy. Additionally, this treatment option has intriguing clinical relevance for patients who are resistant to ABL TKIs.

CML-487 First-in-Human Phase I Study of ELVN-001, an Oral, Selective BCR::ABL1 Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor, in Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Who Failed Prior Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

CML-487 First-in-Human Phase I Study of ELVN-001, an Oral, Selective BCR::ABL1 Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor, in Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Who Failed Prior Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

An Update on the Management of Advanced Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.

While most patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) present in a chronic phase and are expected to have a normal life expectancy, some patients present with or progress to a more aggressive accelerated phase (AP) or blast phase (BP) of CML. Herein, we discuss the diagnostic considerations of advanced phase CML and review its contemporary management. Later-generation, more potent BCR::ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as ponatinib may result in superior outcomes in patients with advanced phase CML. For CML-BP, combination approaches directed against the blast immunophenotype appear superior to TKI monotherapy. The role of allogeneic stem cell transplantation is controversial in CML-AP but has consistently been shown to improve outcomes for patients with CML-BP. Advanced phase CML, particularly CML-BP, remains a poor risk subtype of CML. However, novel combination approaches using later-generation TKIs are being explored in clinical trials and may lead to improved outcomes.