Abd-B Gene Research Articles

The Drosophila Fab-7 boundary modulates Abd-B gene activity by guiding an inversion of collinear chromatin organization and alternate promoter use

Hox genes encode transcription factors that specify segmental identities along the anteroposterior body axis. These genes are organized in clusters, where their order corresponds to their activity along the body axis, a feature known as collinearity. In Drosophila, the BX-C cluster contains the three most posterior Hox genes, where their collinear activation incorporates progressive changes in histone modifications, chromatin architecture, and use of boundary elements and cis-regulatory regions. To dissect functional hierarchies, we compare chromatin organization in cell lines and larvae, with a focus on the Abd-B gene. Our work establishes the importance of the Fab-7 boundary for insulation between 3D domains carrying different histone modifications. Interestingly, we detect a non-canonical inversion of collinear chromatin dynamics at Abd-B, with the domain of active histone modifications progressively decreasing in size. This dynamic chromatin organization differentially activates the alternative promoters of the Abd-B gene, thereby expanding the possibilities for fine-tuning of transcriptional output.

Identification and characterization of homeobox gene clusters in harpacticoid and calanoid copepods.

In this study, we have identified the entire complement of typical homeobox (Hox) genes (Lab, Pb, Dfd, Scr, Antp, Ubx, Abd-A, and Abd-B) in harpacticoid and calanoid copepods and compared them with the cyclopoid copepod Paracyclopina nana. The harpacticoid copepods Tigriopus japonicus and Tigriopus kingsejongensis have seven Hox genes (Lab, Dfd, Scr, Antp, Ubx, Abd-A, and Abd-B) and the Pb and Ftz genes are also present in the cyclopoid copepod P. nana. In the Hox gene cluster of the calanoid copepod Eurytemora affinis, all the Hox genes were present linearly in the genome but the Antp gene was duplicated. Of the three representative copepods, the P. nana Hox gene cluster was the most compact due to its small genome size. The Hox gene expression profile patterns in the three representative copepods were stage-specific. The Lab, Dfd, Scr, Pb, Ftz, and Hox3 genes showed a high expression in early developmental stages but Antp, Ubx, Abd-A, and Abd-B genes were mostly expressed in later developmental stages, implying that these Hox genes may be closely associated with the development of segment identity during early development.

Drosophila architectural protein CTCF is not essential for fly survival and is able to function independently of CP190

CTCF is the most likely ancestor of proteins that contain large clusters of C2H2 zinc finger domains (C2H2) and is conserved among most bilateral organisms. In mammals, CTCF functions as the main architectural protein involved in the organization of topology-associated domains (TADs). In vertebrates and Drosophila, CTCF is involved in the regulation of homeotic genes. Previously, it was found that null mutations in the dCTCF gene died as pharate adults, which failed to eclose from their pupal case, or shortly after hatching of adults. Here, we obtained several new null dCTCF mutations and found that the complete inactivation of dCTCF appears is limited mainly to phenotypic manifestations of the Abd-B gene and fertility of adult flies. Many modifiers that are not associated with an independent phenotypic manifestation can significantly enhance the expressivity of the null dCTCF mutations, indicating that other architectural proteins are able to functionally compensate for dCTCF inactivation in Drosophila. We also mapped the 715–735 aa region of dCTCF as being essential for the interaction with the BTB (Broad-Complex, Tramtrack, and Bric a brac) and microtubule-targeting (M) domains of the CP190 protein, which binds to many architectural proteins. However, the mutational analysis showed that the interaction with CP190 was not important for the functional activity of dCTCF in vivo.

Complete reconstitution of bypass and blocking functions in a minimal artificial Fab-7 insulator from Drosophila bithorax complex

Boundaries in the bithorax complex (BX-C) delimit autonomous regulatory domains that drive parasegment-specific expression of the Hox genes Ubx, abd-A, and Abd-B The Fab-7 boundary is located between the iab-6 and iab-7 domains and has two key functions: blocking cross-talk between these domains and at the same time promoting communication (boundary bypass) between iab-6 and the Abd-B promoter. Using a replacement strategy, we found that multimerized binding sites for the architectural proteins Pita, Su(Hw), and dCTCF function as conventional insulators and block cross-talk between the iab-6 and iab-7 domains; however, they lack bypass activity, and iab-6 is unable to regulate Abd-B Here we show that an ∼200-bp sequence of dHS1 from the Fab-7 boundary rescues the bypass defects of these multimerized binding sites. The dHS1 sequence is bound in embryos by a large multiprotein complex, Late Boundary Complex (LBC), that contains the zinc finger proteins CLAMP and GAF. Using deletions and mutations in critical GAGAG motifs, we show that bypass activity correlates with the efficiency of recruitment of LBC components CLAMP and GAF to the artificial boundary. These results indicate that LBC orchestrates long-distance communication between the iab-6 regulatory domain and the Abd-B gene, while the Pita, Su(Hw), and dCTCF proteins function to block local cross-talk between the neighboring regulatory domains iab-6 and iab-7.

Different Evolutionary Strategies To Conserve Chromatin Boundary Function in the Bithorax Complex.

Chromatin boundary elements subdivide chromosomes in multicellular organisms into physically independent domains. In addition to this architectural function, these elements also play a critical role in gene regulation. Here we investigated the evolution of a Drosophila Bithorax complex boundary element called Fab-7, which is required for the proper parasegment specific expression of the homeotic Abd-B gene. Using a “gene” replacement strategy, we show that Fab-7 boundaries from two closely related species, D. erecta and D. yakuba, and a more distant species, D. pseudoobscura, are able to substitute for the melanogaster boundary. Consistent with this functional conservation, the two known Fab-7 boundary factors, Elba and LBC, have recognition sequences in the boundaries from all species. However, the strategies used for maintaining binding and function in the face of sequence divergence is different. The first is conventional, and depends upon conservation of the 8 bp Elba recognition sequence. The second is unconventional, and takes advantage of the unusually large and flexible sequence recognition properties of the LBC boundary factor, and the deployment of multiple LBC recognition elements in each boundary. In the former case, binding is lost when the recognition sequence is altered. In the latter case, sequence divergence is accompanied by changes in the number, relative affinity, and location of the LBC recognition elements.

Following the intracellular localization of the iab-8ncRNA of the bithorax complex using the MS2-MCP-GFP system

Homeotic genes are aligned on the chromosome in the order of the segments that they specify along the antero-posterior axis of the fly. In general the genes affecting the more posterior segments repress the more anterior genes, a phenomenon known as “posterior dominance”. There is however a noticeable exception to this rule in the central nervous system of Drosophila melanogaster where the posterior Abd-B gene does not repress the immediately more anterior abd-A gene. Instead, abd-A repression is accomplished by a 92kb-long ncRNA (the iab-8ncRNA) that is transcribed from the large inter-genic region between abd-A and Abd-B. This iab-8ncRNA encodes a microRNA to repress abd-A and also a second redundant repression mechanism acting in cis and thought to be transcriptional interference with the abd-A promoter. Using in situ hybridization, a previous work suggested that the iab8ncRNA transcript forms discrete foci restricted to the nuclear periphery and that this localization may be important for its function. In order to better characterize the intra-cellular localization of the iab-8ncRNA we used the MS2-MCP system, which allows fluorescent labeling of RNA in cells and relies on the interaction between GFP-tagged MS2 coat protein (MCP-GFP) and MS2 RNA stem loops. Our results indicate that the large foci seen in previous studies correspond to the site of iab8ncRNA transcription and that the foci seen may simply be an indication of the level of transcription at the locus. We find no evidence to suggest that this localization is important for its function on abd-A repression. We discuss the idea that the iab-8ncRNA may be a relic of a more general ancient mechanism of posterior dominance during the emergence of the hox clusters that was mediated by transcriptional interference.

Functional interaction between an insulator and a Pc-dependent silencer by the example of the Mcp boundary of the Drosophila melanogaster Abd-B gene

Insulators are cis-regulatory elements that prevent improper gene activation and heterochromatin spreading. An insulator is contained in the Mcp boundary from the regulatory region of the Drosophila melanogaster Abd-B gene. The barrier function of the Mcp insulator was studied and proved to be due to two modules. One is responsible for long-distance interactions and the capability of blocking enhancers. The other is essential for blocking Pc-dependent repression. It was observed for the first time that an insulator increased the repressor activity of a neighbor silencer.

Drosophila castor is regulated negatively by the Ubx and abdA genes, but positively by the AbdB gene

The ventral nerve cord (VNC) of Drosophila exhibits significant segmental-specific characteristics during embryonic development. Homeotic genes are expressed over long periods of time and confer identity to the different segments. castor (cas) is one of the genes which are expressed in neuroblasts along the VNC. However, at late embryonic stages, cas transcripts are found only in head and thoracic segments and terminal abdominal segments, while Cas protein lasts longer in all segments. In this study, we investigated the regulation of temporal and spatial expression of cas by the bithorax complex genes. In the loss-of-function mutants of Ultrabithorax (Ubx) and abdominal-A (abdA), cas transcripts were ectopically expressed in abdominal segments at late embryonic stage. However, unlike in Ubx and abdA mutants, in Abdominal-B (AbdB) loss-of-function mutant embryos, cas disappeared in the terminal region. Ectopic Ubx and abdA suppressed cas expression, but ectopic AbdB activated cas expression in most abdominal segments. Moreover, cas was co-expressed in the cells in which AbdB was normally expressed, and overexpressed in the ectopically expressed AbdB embryos. These results suggest that the expression of cas is segment-specifically regulated negatively by Ubx and abdA genes, but positively by the AbdB gene.

Genome wide ChIP-chip analyses reveal important roles for CTCF in Drosophila genome organization

Insulators or chromatin boundary elements are defined by their ability to block transcriptional activation by an enhancer and to prevent the spread of active or silenced chromatin. Recent studies have increasingly suggested that insulator proteins play a role in large-scale genome organization. To better understand insulator function on the global scale, we conducted a genome-wide analysis of the binding sites for the insulator protein CTCF in Drosophila by Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) followed by a tiling-array analysis. The analysis revealed CTCF binding to many known domain boundaries within the Abd-B gene of the BX-C including previously characterized Fab-8 and MCP insulators, and the Fab-6 region. Based on this finding, we characterized the Fab-6 insulator element. In genome-wide analysis, we found that dCTCF-binding sites are often situated between closely positioned gene promoters, consistent with the role of CTCF as an insulator protein. Importantly, CTCF tends to bind gene promoters just upstream of transcription start sites, in contrast to the predicted binding sites of the insulator protein Su(Hw). These findings suggest that CTCF plays more active roles in regulating gene activity and it functions differently from other insulator proteins in organizing the Drosophila genome.

The nuclear organization of Polycomb/Trithorax group response elements in larval tissues of Drosophila melanogaster

We analysed the nuclear organization of the Polycomb/Trithorax group response element (PRE/TRE) Fab-7 and of other PRE/TREs in larval tissues of D. melanogaster. The results show that pairing/clustering of transgenic and endogenous Fab-7 elements and of other endogenous PRE/TREs occurs only to a limited degree in a highly locus-specific and tissue-specific manner. However, transgenic Fab-7 elements as well as the Fab-7-regulated Abd-B gene and other endogenous loci preferentially occupied defined nuclear regions. Preferred association with the nuclear periphery was observed in the inactive state. However, also in the active state, Fab-7 was often found associated with the nuclear periphery as well as with the boundary of heterochromatin in a fly line- and tissue-specific manner. The boundary between heterochromatin and euchromatin revealed a highly complex architecture in the three-dimensional nuclear space with a close juxtaposition of active and repressed domains. The results suggest that such complex architectures create nuclear microenvironments sustaining specific states of activity of defined PRE/TREs. However, the data also show that the positional behaviour of the transgenic Fab-7 element does not apply to PRE/TREs in general. Altogether, this finding and the highly locus-, tissue-, and fly line-specific behaviour with regard to nuclear positioning and pairing/clustering suggest that the relationships between nuclear organization and functional regulation of PRE/TREs are highly complex and that simple models making general predictions might not be appropriate.

Functional interaction between the Fab-7 and Fab-8 boundaries and the upstream promoter region in the Drosophila Abd-B gene.

Boundary elements have been found in the regulatory region of the Drosophila melanogaster Abdominal-B (Abd-B) gene, which is subdivided into a series of iab domains. The best-studied Fab-7 and Fab-8 boundaries flank the iab-7 enhancer and isolate it from the four promoters regulating Abd-B expression. Recently binding sites for the Drosophila homolog of the vertebrate insulator protein CTCF (dCTCF) were identified in the Fab-8 boundary and upstream of Abd-B promoter A, with no binding of CTCF to the Fab-7 boundary being detected either in vivo or in vitro. Taking into account the inability of the yeast GAL4 activator to stimulate the white promoter when its binding sites are separated by a 5-kb yellow gene, we have tested the functional interactions between the Fab-7 and Fab-8 boundaries and between these boundaries and the upstream promoter A region containing a dCTCF binding site. It has been found that dCTCF binding sites are essential for pairing between two Fab-8 insulators. However, a strong functional interaction between the Fab-7 and Fab-8 boundaries suggests that additional, as yet unidentified proteins are involved in long-distance interactions between them. We have also shown that Fab-7 and Fab-8 boundaries effectively interact with the upstream region of the Abd-B promoter.

DmOAZ, the unique Drosophila melanogaster OAZ homologue is involved in posterior spiracle development

In this paper, we study DmOAZ, the unique Drosophila melanogaster homologue of the OAZ zinc finger protein family. We show partial conservation of the zinc finger organization between DmOAZ and the vertebrate members of this family. We determine the exon/intron structure of the dmOAZ gene and deduce its open reading frame. Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction analysis shows that dmOAZ is transcribed throughout life. In the embryo, strongest DmOAZ expression is observed in the posterior spiracles. We suggest that dmOAZ acts as a secondary target of the Abd-B gene in posterior spiracle development, downstream of cut and ems. In a newly created loss-of-function mutant, dmOAZ ( 93 ), the "filzkörper" part of the posterior spiracles, is indeed structurally abnormal. The dmOAZ ( 93 ) mutant is a larval lethal, a phenotype that may be linked to the spiracular defect. Given the dmOAZ ( 93 ) mutant as a new tool, the fruit fly may provide an alternative model for analyzing in vivo the functions of OAZ family members.

Yin Yang 1 Physically Interacts with Hoxa11 and Represses Hoxa11-dependent Transcription

Yin Yang 1 (YY1) plays an indispensable role in embryonic development. YY1 contains an evolutionarily conserved, 22-amino acid segment, the PHO homology region (PHR), which is located within its central domain (spacer) and has been shown previously to participate in the recruitment of Polycomb group of proteins and in YY1-mediated transcription. In this report, we show that the PHR physically interacts with several Abd-B-type Hox proteins. Although ectopic expression of Hoxa11 enhanced target promoter activity, overexpression of YY1 repressed this effect, which was abrogated by YY1 siRNA and the histone deacetylase inhibitor trichostatin A. We have further demonstrated that this suppression effect was the result of YY1-dependent recruitment of HDAC2 to the Hoxa11 target promoter. Taken together, our findings show that YY1 represses Hoxa11-dependent transcription via interactions with the Hox proteins and HDAC recruitment, providing a link between an Abd-type Hox protein and a Polycomb group protein at the level of direct protein-protein interactions. These findings not only provide a novel insight into YY1 function but also identify a new regulation of homeotic protein-mediated transcriptional regulation in general.

Hyped‐up for Hox in Hyderabad

The EMBO Workshop on Upstream and Downstream of Hox Genes took place in Hyderabad, India, between 14 and 17 December 2005, and was organized by R. Mishra and F. Karch. ![][1] For many years, EMBO workshops dealing with new insights into the regulation and function of Hox genes have been held in Switzerland. However, last year, the EMBO World Programme, together with the Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology (CCMB), held a workshop entitled Upstream and Downstream of Hox Genes in the CCMB's hometown of Hyderabad, India. Imagine beautiful gardens full of butterflies and palm trees, a delightful guest house neighbouring a state‐of‐the‐art research centre, all in a peaceful oasis surrounded by a pulsating and crowded Indian city. The question at the beginning of the meeting was whether the talks and discussions would match the stunning environment; it was answered rapidly and affirmatively. Hox genes have had an illustrious and curious history. Perhaps one of the most famous images in biology from the past century is the four‐winged mutant of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster caused by mutations in the Hox gene Ultrabithorax ( Ubx ). This fascinating mutant fly, discovered and characterized by Edward B. Lewis, has motivated many investigators to join the field to understand how these genes are responsible for such complex changes in morphology. Another highlight of Hox history was Matthew Scott's, William McGinnis's and Walter Gehring's discovery of the homeodomain—a 60‐amino‐acid DNA‐binding motif now known to be a key domain in hundreds of genes throughout the animal, fungal and plant kingdoms. Although a lot has been learned through experiments stemming from these important discoveries, there are still many open questions. Among the questions being debated in the field and at the meeting are: How is the regulation of the Hox genes initiated and maintained? How do Hox proteins … [1]: /embed/graphic-1.gif

The evolution of abdominal reduction and the recent origin of distinct Abdominal‐B transcript classes in Diptera

In insects, the Hox gene Abdominal-B (Abd-B) governs the development of the posterior-most segments, the number and fate of which differ within and between orders. A striking feature of insect evolution is a trend toward the reduction of posterior abdominal segments which is most pronounced in higher Diptera. In Drosophila melanogaster, two distinct Abd-B transcript classes and protein isoforms are expressed in non-overlapping domains and have discrete functions in patterning the posterior abdomen. It has been proposed that evolutionary changes in Abd-B structure and expression are responsible for the reduction of the dipteran abdomen. We have investigated the relationship between the evolution of the Abd-B gene and abdominal reduction by analyzing the structure and expression of homologs from four additional dipterans representing distinct clades within the order. The lower dipteran mosquito Anopheles gambiae expresses a single Abd-B transcript class, as do two species phylogenetically intermediate to mosquitoes and drosophilids. These results delimit the evolution of distinct functional Abd-B isoforms to within the dipteran radiation after the origin of the reduced abdominal morphology. Furthermore, we found that the spatial distribution of Abd-B transcripts in non-drosophilid Diptera is identical to the combined domains of the two D. melanogaster Abd-B transcripts. Therefore, neither the structural evolution nor changes in the spatial regulation of Abd-B account for the derived abdomen of higher Diptera. The recent subfunctionalization of this Hox gene has occurred without any apparent morphological correlate. We conclude that regulatory modifications to developmental programs downstream of or parallel to Abd-B are responsible for the evolutionary reduction of the higher dipteran postabdomen.

A subgroup of HOX Abd-B gene is differentially expressed in cervical cancer

The HOX genes are a family of transcription factors that bind to specific sequences of DNA in target genes regulating their expression. The role of HOX genes in adult cell differentiation is still obscure, but growing evidence suggests that they may play an important role in the development of cancer. In order to study the role of the HOX Abd-B genes in cervical cancer, we analyzed their expression in cervical tissues. Reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction and RNAin situhybridization were used to detect HOX Abd-B messenger RNA expression in nine normal cervical tissues and ten cervical carcinomas. The normal tissues were human papillomavirus (HPV) negative, whereas all invasive carcinomas included were HPV16 positive. In this study, we show that HOXA9, A10, A11, A13, B9, D11, and D13 genes are expressed in both the epithelium of normal tissues and neoplastic cells from squamous cervical carcinomas. Interestingly, the HOXC10 and D12 genes were not expressed in any cervical tissues; however, HOXB13, C9, C11, C12, C13, D9, and D10 genes were expressed only in the tumoral tissues but not in the normal cervix. Our findings suggest that the expression of HOXB13, D9, D10, and HOXC cluster (HOXC9, C11–C13) genes might be an important step involved in cervical cancer.

A subgroup of HOX Abd-B gene is differentially expressed in cervical cancer

The HOX genes are a family of transcription factors that bind to specific sequences of DNA in target genes regulating their expression. The role of HOX genes in adult cell differentiation is still obscure, but growing evidence suggests that they may play an important role in the development of cancer. In order to study the role of the HOX Abd-B genes in cervical cancer, we analyzed their expression in cervical tissues. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and RNA in situ hybridization were used to detect HOX Abd-B messenger RNA expression in nine normal cervical tissues and ten cervical carcinomas. The normal tissues were human papillomavirus (HPV) negative, whereas all invasive carcinomas included were HPV16 positive. In this study, we show that HOXA9, A10, A11, A13, B9, D11, and D13 genes are expressed in both the epithelium of normal tissues and neoplastic cells from squamous cervical carcinomas. Interestingly, the HOXC10 and D12 genes were not expressed in any cervical tissues; however, HOXB13, C9, C11, C12, C13, D9, and D10 genes were expressed only in the tumoral tissues but not in the normal cervix. Our findings suggest that the expression of HOXB13, D9, D10, and HOXC cluster (HOXC9, C11-C13) genes might be an important step involved in cervical cancer.

Search for new regulatory elements of the Bithorax complex in Drosophila melanogaster

The Ultrabithorax (Ubx), Abdominal-A (Abd-A), and Abdominal-B (Abd-B) homeotic genes of the Bithorax complex are responsible for the development of body segments in Drosophila melanogaster. Their regulatory region of approximately 300 kb harbors a series of specific enhancers, each regulating expression in a single parasegment. Molecular genetic analysis of the Abd-B gene revealed the regulatory modules MCP, Fab-7, and Fab-8, which contain insulators with adjacent silencers. The present work was aimed at searching for similar regulatory elements in the promoter regions of the Abd-A and Abd-B genes and new regulatory modules in the Abd-B gene region. Four DNA fragments, each containing numerous specific sequences characteristic of regulatory modules, were tested for the ability to suppress transcription of the yellow and white genes and for the interaction with MCP. The DNA fragment of the Abd-A promoter region proved to act as an effective silencer. The fragment of the iab4 domain showed insulator properties. The fragment of the Abd-B promoter region interacted with MCP in providing for communication between the enhancer and promoter of the white gene.

Replacement of Fab-7 by the gypsy or scs Insulator Disrupts Long-Distance Regulatory Interactions in the Abd-B Gene of the Bithorax Complex

Chromatin domain boundaries, like scs or gypsy insulators in Drosophila, have been identified in transgene assays through their enhancer-blocking activity. Boundary elements in the bithorax complex (BX-C), such as Fab-7 and Fab-8, have been identified genetically and been shown to have insulator activity in transgene assays. However, it is not clear whether boundary elements identified in transgene assays will function appropriately in chromosomal contexts such as BX-C. Using gene conversion, we have substituted the scs or gypsy insulators for Fab-7. We find that both scs and gypsy are very potent insulators in the ectoderm, but surprisingly, the insulating activity of gypsy (but not scs) is lost in the CNS. Our results reveal that the Fab-7 boundary must have special properties that scs and gypsy lack, which allow it to function appropriately in BX-C regulation.

The Paralogous Hox Genes Hoxa10 and Hoxd10 Interact to Pattern the Mouse Hindlimb Peripheral Nervous System and Skeleton

The most 5′ mouse Hoxa and Hoxd genes, which occupy positions 9–13 and which are related to the Drosophila AbdB gene, are all active in patterning developing limbs. Inactivation of individual genes produces alterations in skeletal elements of both forelimb and hindlimb; inactivation of some of these genes also alters hindlimb innervation. Simultaneous inactivation of paralogous or nonparalogous Hoxa and Hoxd genes produces more widespread alterations, suggesting that combinatorial interactions between these genes are required for proper limb patterning. We have examined the effects of simultaneous inactivation of Hoxa10 and Hoxd10 on mouse hindlimb skeletal and nervous system development. These paralogous genes are expressed at lumbar and sacral levels of the developing neural tube and surrounding axial mesoderm as well as in developing forelimb and hindlimb buds. Double-mutant animals demonstrated impaired locomotor behavior and altered development of posterior vertebrae and hindlimb skeletal elements. Alterations in hindlimb innervation were also observed, including truncations and deletions of the tibial and peroneal nerves. Animals carrying fewer mutant alleles show similar, but less extreme phenotypes. These observations suggest that Hoxa10 and Hoxd10 coordinately regulate skeletal development and innervation of the hindlimb.