Abbreviated Protocol Research Articles

The diagnostic value of abbreviated MRI protocol in the surveillance of Branch-Duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm

PurposeTo assess the diagnostic value of abbreviated protocol (AP) MRI to detect the degeneration signs in branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (BD-IPMNs) in patients undergoing a routine MRI follow-up. MethodsThis dual-center retrospective study include patients with BD-IPMN diagnosed on initial comprehensive protocol (CP) MRI who underwent routine MRI follow-up. CP included axial and coronal T2-weighted images (T2WI), axial T1-weighted images (T1WI) before and after contrast administration, 3D MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and diffusion-weighted images (DWI). Two APs, eliminating dynamic sequences ± DWI, were extracted from CP. Two radiologists evaluated the APs separately for IPMN degeneration signs according to Fukuoka criteria and compared the results to the follow-up CP. In patients who underwent EUS, imaging findings were correlated with pathological results. Per-patient and per-lesion sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of APs were calculated. Additionally, the acquisition time for different protocols was calculated. ResultsOne hundred-fourteen patients (56.1 % women, median age: 71 years) with 256 lesions were included. Degeneration signs were observed in 24.6 % and 12.1 % per-patient and per-lesion, respectively. Regarding APs, the per patient sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy in the detection of the degeneration signs were 100 %, 93.5 %, 83.3 %, 100 %, and 95.1 %, respectively. No additional role for DWI was detected. AP without DWI economized nearly half of CP acquisition time (388 versus 663 s, respectively). ConclusionAP can confidently replace CP for BD-IPMN follow-up with high sensitivity and PPV while offering benefits such as patient comfort, improved MRI accessibility, and reduced dedicated time for image analysis. DWI necessitates special consideration. Clinical Relevance StatementOur data suggest that APs safely detect all degeneration signs of IPMN. While there is an overestimation of mural nodules due to the lack of contrast injection, this occurs in a negligible number of patients.

Can the abbreviated MRI protocol replace the standard full protocol in the detection and characterization of breast non-mass enhancement?

BackgroundBreast MRI full diagnostic protocol (FDP) showed great value in detecting and characterizing non-mass enhancement (NME); however, it is costly and time-consuming. MRI abbreviated protocol (AP) showed comparable accuracy to FDP in various indications but has not been specifically tested in NME. Our study purpose is to assess the accuracy of the AP in the detection and characterization of breast NME in comparison with the FDP and to perform time analysis of the AP.MethodsPatients who demonstrated NME in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI were included to be assessed using AP and FDP. Image analysis was performed blindly and independently. Firstly, reconstructed images from the pre- and first post-contrast T1WI (first maximum intensity projection and subtraction) were made available as AP. Later, the time/signal intensity curve and remaining images of the FDP were added to the assessment. Both protocols were compared regarding acquisition time, interpretation time, BI-RADS scores and accuracy in the detection and characterization of NME in correlation to histopathology and/or follow-up. Validity statistics, Cohen-Kappa and ROC curve were used.ResultsFifty-nine NME lesions were identified. AP acquisition and interpretation times were significantly shorter than those of the FDP (3.3 vs. 35 min) and (45 “25–75 s” vs. 108 “80–150 s”) (P < 0.001), respectively. There was almost perfect agreement between the two protocols in the BIRADS grading of NME (k = 0.950, P < 0.001). In ROC curve analysis, the FDP was insignificantly more accurate than the AP (84.8% vs. 81.4%, P = 0.144).ConclusionsBreast MRI–AP is comparable to the FDP in the detection and characterization of breast NME with advantageous time saving.

Diagnostic validity of abbreviated breast MRI in the diagnosis of breast cancer: a comparative study to the full breast MRI protocol using BI-RADS.

This work aimed to determine the diagnostic performance of the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) breast abbreviated protocol (AP) in diagnosing malignant breast lesions using BI-RADS compared with the diagnostic accuracy of the full diagnostic protocol (FDP). A prospective single-centre study was conducted. A total of 125 female patients with suspicious breast masses underwent MRI with the AP and the FDP. The images of AP and FDP were independently interpreted by 2 radiologists with 10 years of experience in breast imaging, and any disagreement was resolved with a third one. Using the histopathological examination as a reference test, the diagnostic effectiveness of both FDP and AP in breast cancer screening was calculated. ROC curve was utilised to estimate the optimal BI-RADS cut-off for prediction of malignancy. The difference in image interpretation time between both protocols was estimated using the Mann-Whitney test. Moreover, the inter-test agreement between both protocols was assessed using Cohen's κ test. The study included 83 malignant and 42 benign lesions. AP indicated a specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy of 90.5%, 96.4%, and 94.4%, while the FDP showed a specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy of 92.9%, 100%, and 97.6%, respectively. BI-RADS 3 category was the best cut-off for prediction of malignancy. There was a significant difference between both protocols concerning the interpretation time (p < 0.001). There was excellent agreement between both protocols, with a κ of 0.915. Breast MRI AP may be employed instead of FDP to identify breast cancer with similar diagnostic performance. Moreover, it reduces the interpretation time and the scan cost.

Diagnostic value of combined use of abbreviated breast MRI and diffusion-weighted MRI in the prediction of breast cancer

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic performances of abbreviated protocol (AP) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), AP combined with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and full dynamic protocol (FDP) in the differentiation of breast cancers from benign breast diseases.&#x0D; Materials and Methods: The total study population consisted of 68 patients who underwent breast MRI (1.5 Tesla) between January 2016 and December 2021 for the evaluation of suspicious findings on mammography or ultrasonography. All lesions were evaluated by 2 radiologists using AP, AP+DWI, and FDP. The reader sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were analyzed using the “Chi-squared” test. The inter-observer agreement (IOA) between the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category assessments of the two readers was evaluated by using the “Kappa statistics”.&#x0D; Results: Sixty-eight patients with 72 lesions (31 malignant and 41 benign) were analyzed. The sensitivity/specificity for AP and AP+DWI for reader 1 was 67.7/90.2% and 80.6/87.8%, respectively, and for reader 2 was 67.7/92.6% and 70.9/90.2%, respectively. The sensitivity/specificity for FDP for reader 1 was 83.7/85.3% and for reader 2 was 80.6/90.2%. The IOA in the BI-RADS category assessment was almost perfect in all models between two readers (the kappa value was 0.907, 0.825, and 0.858 in AP, AP+DWI, and FDP, respectively).&#x0D; Conclusion: FDP showed greater diagnostic efficiency in the characterization of tumor biology as compared to AP and AP +DWI. Combining AP with DWI improved the diagnostic performance of MRI for the determination of malignancy.

Abbreviated and Standard Breast MRI in Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response Evaluation: A Comparative Study.

This study aims to investigate the efficacy of abbreviated breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) response evaluation. MR images of 50 locally advanced breast cancer patients who underwent standard protocol (SP) breast MRI before and after NAC were re-evaluated retrospectively. Abbreviated protocol (AP) was obtained by extracting images from SP and then evaluating them in a separate session. Protocols were compared with the histological findings after surgery as the reference standard. A statistically significant difference was found between the two protocols in response evaluation by the McNemar test (p=0.018). However, the Kappa value was 0.62 (p<0.001), which indicates substantial agreement. No statistically significant differences were found between the two protocols (AP and SP) and pathological results in the McNemar test (p=0.12, p=0.60, respectively). Kappa values were 0.48 (p<0.001) and 0.60 (p<0.001), respectively, which indicates moderate agreement for both protocols with higher values by SP evaluation. The residual maximum median diameters were smaller than the pathology, with both protocols (p<0.001). Despite the statistical differences, there was a significant correlation in response evaluation between the two protocols. The pathological results were moderately correlated with both protocols, with SP slightly higher. However, the residual maximum median diameters were smaller than the pathology with both protocols. These results may limit the use of AP in evaluating the local extent of the tumor, especially in patients who will undergo breast-conserving surgery.

Diagnostic protocols in oncology: workup and treatment planning. Part 2: Abbreviated MR protocol.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a non-invasive imaging technique (non-ionizing radiation) with superior soft tissue contrasts and potential morphological and functional applications. However, long examination and interpretation times, as well as higher costs, still represent barriers to MRI use in clinical routine. Abbreviated MRI protocols have emerged as an alternative to standard MRI protocols. Abbreviated MRI protocols eliminate redundant sequences that negatively affect cost, acquisition time, patient comfort. However, the diagnostic information is generally not compromised. Abbreviated MRI protocols have already been utilized for hepatocellular carcinoma, for prostate cancer detection, and for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease screening.

Abbreviated protocol combining quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging: a new strategy increasing diagnostic accuracy for breast magnetic resonance imaging?

To compare the diagnostic accuracy of an abbreviated protocol (AP) with or without quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and a full diagnostic protocol (FDP) in terms of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) classification of breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Our study sample consisted of 436 patients undergoing breast MRI from January to October 2015 in a clinical setting. The three reviews included a pre-contrast and the first single post-contrast T1-weighted (T1W) sequences (AP1), AP1 combined with quantitative DWI (AP2), and the FDP, the AP1 of which were assessed independently by a junior and senior radiologist. Agreement on the evaluation of the BI-RADS classifications (between the junior and senior radiologists, between AP1 and FDP, and between AP2 and FDP) was assessed using the kappa test statistic. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were compared between AP1 and FDP plus between AP2 and FDP. Diagnostic parameters of these reviews were examined using the McNemar test. The study included 436 patients, with 251 breast cancers, 99 benign lesions, and 86 patients with benign or no lesions and followed up for at least 24 months. The agreement of the BI-RADS classifications between the junior and senior radiologists was very good (kappa =0.847). The agreement between AP2 and FDP (kappa =0.931) was higher than the agreement between AP1 and FDP (kappa =0.872) on evaluating the BI-RADS benign and malignant classifications. The sensitivity/specificity/PPV/NPV was 95.6%/83.8%/88.9%/93.4% for AP1, 98.0%/83.8%/89.1%/96.9% for AP2, 98.8%/83.8%/89.2%/98.1% for FDP, respectively. The addition of quantitative DWI to the abbreviated MRI protocol based on the pre-and first post-contrast sequence improved diagnostic performance for characterizing breast lesions. Quantitative DWI may be a useful adjunct to dynamic contrast enhancement (DCE) of breast MRI.

Abbreviated Protocol Breast MRI.

OBJECTIVE. Patients with dense breast tissue are seeking supplemental screening because of the limited sensitivity of mammography. Abbreviated protocol (AP) breast MRI is attractive because it offers a higher cancer detection rate, shorter scan time, and lower cost than full MRI. This article explores the issues of balancing the benefits of AP MRI with safety concerns about gadolinium-based contrast agents, lack of standardization of protocols and field strengths, potential decrease in performance metrics, and potential for overdiagnosis. CONCLUSION. Important questions need to be addressed before AP MRI can be used routinely for breast cancer screening. Evidence is lacking from well-designed prospective trials that can confirm the accuracy and efficacy of AP MRI are comparable with those of other breast imaging modalities. Determining which patients benefit most from AP MRI will help shape future screening guidelines.

Breast magnetic resonance imaging for estimation of the tumour extent in patients with pure ductal carcinoma in situ: Comparison between full diagnostic and abbreviated protocols

PurposeTo evaluate the rate of concordance between pathology and preoperative breast MRI performed with an abbreviated protocol (AP) or a full diagnostic protocol (FDP) for estimation of the tumour extent in patients with pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). MethodsThis retrospective study included 164 patients with pathologically proven DCIS who underwent preoperative breast MRI. Two radiologists independently evaluated the tumour extent on MRI with (FDP) and without the delayed phase (AP) and compared the readings with the pathological tumour extent. The background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) and morphology were also evaluated. Furthermore, the influence of the degree of BPE, presence or absence of B2 and B3 lesions, and pathological DCIS grade on the accuracy of MRI findings was assessed. Concordance between MRI and pathology was evaluated using correlation analysis. ResultsSpearman’s rank correlation coefficients for the concordance between MRI and pathology were 0.63 (reader 1) and 0.69 (reader 2) with AP and 0.65 and 0.73 (readers 1 and 2, respectively) with FDP. For both readers, the difference in the measured value between FDP and pathology was significantly smaller than that between AP and pathology (p < 0.001). The inter-reader variation in the measured tumour extent was larger with FDP than with AP. The presence of B3 lesions, low-grade DCIS, and moderate/marked BPE lowered the rate of concordance between MRI and pathology. ConclusionsOur findings suggest that preoperative MRI with FDP is more accurate than that with AP alone for estimation of the tumour extent in patients with pure DCIS.

Abbreviated breast dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging for lesion detection and characterization: the experience of an Italian oncologic center.

To evaluate the performance of an abbreviated dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging (MRI) protocol for breast cancer detection; a comparison with the complete diagnostic protocol has been conducted. A retrospective analysis on 508 patients was performed. Abbreviated protocol (AP) included one pre-contrast and the first post-contrast T1-weighted series. Complete protocol (CP) consisted of four post-contrast and one pre-contrast T1-weighted series. Diagnostic performance was assessed for AP and CP. Performance comparison was made using McNemar's test for sensitivity and specificity and Moskowitz and Pepe's method as regards negative predictive value (NPV) and positive predictive value (PPV). AP has been realized in two different ways (AP1 and AP2) and they were compared by means of Cohen's κ. Both CP and AP revealed 206 of 207 cancers. There were no statistically significant differences between AP and CP diagnostic performance (P>0.05). NPVs of CP and both versions of AP (99.57 vs. 99.56%, P=0.39), as well as the specificity (77.08 vs. 75.42%, P=0.18), were substantially equivalent. Relative predictive value method did not reveal the presence of a statistically significant difference between the PPV of CP and both versions of AP (74.91 vs. 73.57%, P=0.099). Analysis for single lesion confirmed that both CP and AP had equivalent results: CP and AP revealed 280 of 281 malignancies. NPVs of CP and both AP versions, as well as the specificity (P>0.05), were substantially equivalent. Relative predictive value method did not reveal the presence of a significant difference between the PPV of CP and both AP versions (70.89 vs. 70.18%, P=0.25; 70.89 vs. 70.00%, P=0.13). Abbreviated approach to breast MRI examination reduces the image acquisition and the reading time associated with MR substantially without influencing the diagnostic accuracy (high sensitivity and NPV >99.5%). AP could translate into cost-savings and could enable a higher number of examinations within the same MR session.

Systematic development of an abbreviated protocol for screening breast magnetic resonance imaging

Rationale & objectivesWe sought to develop an abbreviated protocol (AP) for breast MRI that maximizes lesion detection by assessing each lesion not seen on mammography by each acquisition from a full diagnostic protocol (FDP).Materials & methods671 asymptomatic women (mean 55.7 years, range 40–80) with a negative mammogram were prospectively enrolled in this IRB approved study. All lesions on MRI not visualized on mammography were analyzed, reported, and suspicious lesions biopsied. In parallel, all FDP MRI acquisitions were scored by lesion to eventually create a high-yield AP.ResultsFDP breast MRI detected 452 findings not visible on mammography, including 17 suspicious lesions recommended for biopsy of which seven (PPV 41.2%) were malignant in six women. Mean size of the four invasive malignancies was 1.9 cm (range 0.7–4.1), all node negative; three lesions in two women were ductal carcinoma in situ. Nine biopsied lesions were benign, mean size 1.2 cm (range 0.6–2.0). All biopsied lesions were in women with dense breasts (heterogeneously or extremely dense on mammography, n = 367), for a cancer detection rate of 16.3/1000 examinations in this subpopulation. These data were used to identify four high-yield acquisitions: T2, T1-pre-contrast, T11.5, and T16 to create the AP with a scan time of 7.5 min compared to 24 min for the FDP.ConclusionsOur analysis of a FDP MRI in a mammographically negative group identified four high-yield acquisitions that could be used for rapid screening of women for breast cancer that retains critical information on morphology, histopathology, and kinetic activity to facilitate detection of suspicious lesions.

Application of Abbreviated Protocol of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Breast Cancer Screening in Dense Breast Tissue

The study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of an abbreviated protocol (AP) of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in comparison to a full diagnostic protocol (FDP) of MRI in the breast cancer screening with dense breast tissue. There are 478 female participants with dense breast tissue and negative mammography results, who were imaged with MRI using AP and FDP. The AP and FDP images were analyzed separately, and the sensitivity and specificity of breast cancer detection were calculated. The chi-square test and receiver operating characteristics curves were used to assess the breast cancer diagnostic capabilities of the two protocols. Sixteen cases of breast cancer from 478 patients with dense breasts were detected using the FDP method, with pathologic confirmation of nine cases of ductal carcinoma in situ, six cases of invasive ductal carcinoma, and one case of mucinous carcinoma. Fifteen cases of breast cancer were successfully screened using the AP method. The sensitivity showed no obvious significant difference between AP and FDP (χ2 = 0.592, P = 0.623), but the specificity showed a statistically significant difference (χ2 = 4.619, P = 0.036). The receiver operating characteristics curves showed high efficacy of both methods in the detection of breast cancer in dense breast tissue (the areas under the curve were 0.931 ± 0.025 and 0.947 ± 0.024, respectively), and the ability to diagnose breast cancer was not statistically significantly different between the two methods. The AP of MRI may improve the detection rate of breast cancer in dense breast tissue, and it may be useful in efficient breast cancer screening.

Abbreviated breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): first postcontrast subtracted images and maximum-intensity projection-a novel approach to breast cancer screening with MRI.

We investigated whether an abbreviated protocol (AP), consisting of only one pre- and one postcontrast acquisition and their derived images (first postcontrast subtracted [FAST] and maximum-intensity projection [MIP] images), was suitable for breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) screening. We conducted a prospective observational reader study in 443 women at mildly to moderately increased risk who underwent 606 screening MRIs. Eligible women had normal or benign digital mammograms and, for those with heterogeneously dense or extremely dense breasts (n = 427), normal or benign ultrasounds. Expert radiologists reviewed the MIP image first to search for significant enhancement and then reviewed the complete AP (consisting of MIP and FAST images and optionally their nonsubtracted source images) to characterize enhancement and establish a diagnosis. Only thereafter was the regular full diagnostic protocol (FDP) analyzed. MRI acquisition time for FDP was 17 minutes, versus 3 minutes for the AP. Average time to read the single MIP and complete AP was 2.8 and 28 seconds, respectively. Eleven breast cancers (four ductal carcinomas in situ and seven invasive cancers; all T1N0 intermediate or high grade) were diagnosed, for an additional cancer yield of 18.2 per 1,000. MIP readings were positive in 10 (90.9%) of 11 cancers and allowed establishment of the absence of breast cancer, with a negative predictive value (NPV) of 99.8% (418 of 419). Interpretation of the complete AP, as with the FDP, allowed diagnosis of all cancers (11 [100%] of 11). Specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) of AP versus FDP were equivalent (94.3% v 93.9% and 24.4% v 23.4%, respectively). An MRI acquisition time of 3 minutes and an expert radiologist MIP image reading time of 3 seconds are sufficient to establish the absence of breast cancer, with an NPV of 99.8%. With a reading time < 30 seconds for the complete AP, diagnostic accuracy was equivalent to that of the FDP and resulted in an additional cancer yield of 18.2 per 1,000.