Abbreviated New Drug Application Research Articles

Lifecycle Management of Generic product in US market

In the US Market, lifecycle management for generic products includes developing and implementing plans to maximize an item’s market potential from launch to decline. It starts with market research and approval of regulatory involving submission of an Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) to demonstrate bioequivalence to the branded product followed by comprehensive market analysis to identify opportunities and assess rivals. Companies use aggressive pricing and marketing techniques to swiftly increase their market share after a product is approved. Continuous monitoring and adaptability to changes in the market, updates to regulations, and competitive actions are crucial throughout the lifecycle. This review focuses on Market entry strategy, Product launch, Market landscape of Generic Drugs in US.

Patient Safety and Efficacy Considerations in Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) Evaluation: Balancing Access and Regulation

Patient Safety and Efficacy Considerations in Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) Evaluation: Balancing Access and Regulation

Evaluation of the Generic Drug User Fee Act (GDUFA) Program for Fiscal Years 2013-2022.

The effectiveness of the regulatory initiatives, strategies, and incentives put forth in the first two authorizations of the Generic Drug User Fees Act (GDUFA) were evaluated using factors including the number of Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) withdrawals and first-cycle approvals. GDUFA was originally authorized in 2012 for FY 2013-2017 (GDUFA I) and reauthorized for FY 2018-2022 (GDUFA II). ANDA approvals were analyzed from the Drugs @ FDA database covering 2013-2022. From the applications, the approval time, dosage form and route of administration (ROA), product indication, market status of the product, first generic status, company and company size filing the ANDA were noted. Despite the COVID pandemic, there was more than a 40% increase in ANDA approvals during GDUFA II relative to GDUFA I. Oral and parenteral drugs were the two leading categories of approved generics during both iterations of GDUFA. There was more than a 120% increase in withdrawn applications during GDUFA II, which reflects the partial refund that is now offered to incentivize companies to withdraw inadequate applications prior to review. This also appears to have contributed to an increase in the number of first-cycle approvals, which increased by 100% between GDUFA I and II. Due to the COVID-19 public health emergency, there was a decrease in activity within the generic drug program and market. Therefore, it is important to consider this impact when observing actual trends from this study.

Pre-ANDA strategy and Human Factors activities to de-risk pharmaceutical companies ANDA submission of drug–device combination products: case study of a formative Comparative Use Human Factors study

ABSTRACT Background This article presents a strategy that a Drug Delivery Device Developer (DDDD) has adopted to support Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) submissions of drug–device combination products. As per the related FDA guidance, a threshold analysis should be compiled. If ‘other differences’ between the Reference Listed Drug (RLD) and the generic drug devices are identified, a Comparative Use Human Factors (CUHF) study may be requested. Methods The DDDD performed task analysis and physical comparison to assess the pen injector design differences. Then, a formative CUHF study with 25 participants simulating injections using both RLD and the generic pen injectors was conducted. Results After each participant completed four simulated injections, similar type and rates of use error between the RLD (0.70) and generic (0.68) pen injectors were observed. Conclusion DDDDs can support pharmaceutical companies in the ANDA submission strategy of their drug–device combination product by initiating comparative task analysis and physical comparison of the device as inputs for the threshold analysis. If ‘other differences’ are identified, a formative CUHF study can be performed. As shown in our case study, this approach can be leveraged to support the sample size calculation and non-inferiority margin determination for a CUHF study with the final combination product.

Competitive Landscape and Brand Equivalents: Implications for ANDA (Abbreviated New Drug Application) Approval

Generic drugs stand as a beacon of hope within the realm of medicine, offering a pragmatic and wallet-friendly solution for patients seeking essential treatments. They open the doors to the same therapeutic benefits as their brand-name counterparts, all without imposing exorbitant financial burdens. This revolutionary journey begins with the Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA), a pivotal gateway into the stringent regulatory landscape overseen by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Unlike the labyrinthine process faced by novel drugs, generics enjoy a streamlined path to approval, showcasing their equivalence to the original through meticulous validation of identical active ingredients and efficacy. This efficient route not only saves precious time but also preserves valuable financial resources, sidestepping the need for redundant testing mandated for new drugs. With the coveted FDA seal of approval, these generic marvels burst onto the market, offering patients a cost-effective alternative without any compromise on quality or effectiveness. In essence, generic drugs emerge as beacons of accessibility, ensuring that essential treatments reach the masses while steadfastly upholding the highest standards of safety and efficacy. They represent not just a practical solution, but a transformative force in democratizing healthcare access for all.

A Comparative Analysis of Generic Drug Assessment and Regulatory Approval in the USA, Europe and India.

The Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) is used for the regulatory submission of generic drugs, which are pharmaceutical equivalents to brand-name drugs and distributed without patent protection. Different countries have their own regulatory requirements for the approval of generic drugs, enforced by authorities such as the CDSCO in India, EDQM in Europe, and USFDA in the United States. This review aims to compare the regulatory processes and requirements for generic drug approval in India, Europe, and the US, highlighting key differences and challenges. The involvement of regulatory authorities in the drug development process is crucial for expediting approval and addressing queries, helping to minimize delays. The Common Technical Document (CTD) format is employed across regions to harmonize submission requirements. This study underscores the differences in dossier submission for generics across the three regions, illustrating India's position in the global generic drug approval landscape. By comparing approval requirements, this work provides insight into the hurdles India must overcome to streamline its approval process. The ANDA allows generic manufacturers to submit bioequivalence studies, using the original innovator's safety and efficacy data. However, obtaining approval simultaneously from multiple regulatory authorities remains a challenging task. Careful review of regulatory documents by skilled personnel can reduce regulatory queries, ultimately accelerating the market launch of generic drugs. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the generic drug approval process, emphasizing the need for harmonization and improved efficiency in India's regulatory framework.

Assessing the immunogenicity risk of salmon calcitonin peptide impurities using in silico and in vitro methods.

Advances in synthetic peptide synthesis have enabled rapid and cost-effective peptide drug manufacturing. For this reason, peptide drugs that were first produced using recombinant DNA (rDNA) technology are now being produced using solid- and liquid-phase peptide synthesis. While peptide synthesis has some advantages over rDNA expression methods, new peptide-related impurities that differ from the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) may be generated during synthesis. These impurity byproducts of the original peptide sequence feature amino acid insertions, deletions, and side-chain modifications that may alter the immunogenicity risk profile of the drug product. Impurities resulting from synthesis have become the special focus of regulatory review and approval for human use, as outlined in the FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research guidance document, "ANDAs for Certain Highly Purified Synthetic Peptide Drug Products That Refer to Listed Drugs of rDNA Origin," published in 2021. This case study illustrates how in silico and in vitro methods can be applied to assess the immunogenicity risk of impurities that may be present in synthetic generic versions of the salmon calcitonin (SCT) drug product. Sponsors of generic drug abbreviated new drug applications (ANDAs) should consider careful control of these impurities (for example, keeping the concentration of the immunogenic impurities below the cut-off recommended by FDA regulators). Twenty example SCT impurities were analyzed using in silico tools and assessed as having slightly more or less immunogenic risk potential relative to the SCT API peptide. Class II human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-binding assays provided independent confirmation that a 9-mer sequence present in the C-terminus of SCT binds promiscuously to multiple HLA DR alleles, while T-cell assays confirmed the expected T-cell responses to SCT and selected impurities. In silico analysis combined with in vitro assays that directly compare the API to each individual impurity peptide may be a useful approach for assessing the potential immunogenic risk posed by peptide impurities that are present in generic drug products.

A Review Process of ANDA Filling in PMDA (Japan) and Calibration of UV in Accordance to its Regulatory Guidelines

The Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) filing system is an important regulatory process in Japan for the approval of generic drugs. This system allows pharmaceutical companies to submit an application for the marketing and sale of a generic drug, which has already been approved by the regulatory agency in another country. The ANDA system in Japan is similar to that of the United States and Europe, but there are some unique aspects that must be taken into account. For example, in Japan, the regulatory agency requires a separate drug master file for each active pharmaceutical ingredient, which can be a time-consuming process. UV spectrophotometry is a widely used analytical technique for the characterization of pharmaceuticals, including active pharmaceutical ingredients and finished dosage forms. The Shimadzu UV-1800 spectrophotometer is a popular instrument for this purpose, which is widely used in Japan. This instrument has a range of features that make it particularly useful for pharmaceutical analysis, including a wavelength range of 190-1100 nm, a double beam optical system, and a low stray light level. The Shimadzu UV 1800 is also compatible with a range of accessories, such as a multicell holder, which allows for the simultaneous measurement of multiple samples. The combination of the ANDA filing system and UV spectrophotometry using the Shimadzu UV-1800 is an important tool for the development and approval of generic drugs in Japan. The ANDA system allows for a streamlined regulatory process for generic drug approval, while UV spectrophotometry provides a reliable and accurate method for the characterization of pharmaceuticals. Together, these tools help to ensure the safety and efficacy of generic drugs in Japan.

Utility of in vitro release testing (IVRT) to assess ‘sameness’ of 1% clotrimazole creams for use as a biowaiver

The October 2022 draft United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance presents an option of in vitro release test (IVRT) studies as a biowaiver for topical drug products submitted in abbreviated new drug applications (ANDAs). However, the product-specific guidance (PSG) for 1% clotrimazole (CLZ) topical cream does not provide an in vitro option for biowaiver and requires a clinical endpoint study to demonstrate bioequivalence (BE). Therefore, the main objective was to use IVRT to investigate pharmaceutical equivalence of several 1% CLZ topical creams from two countries — South Africa (SA) and Canada. This investigation aims at demonstrating the utility of IVRT to determine ‘sameness’ and/or differences between topical creams containing 1% CLZ and the potential of IVRT for supporting biowaivers, thereby obviating the necessity to conduct clinical endpoint studies in patients. A validated IVRT method was applied to conduct comparative IVRT runs on five generic products marketed in SA and one Canadian generic, which were compared against a relevant comparator product from their country of origin in accordance with the FDA’s acceptance criteria of 75–133.33%. All five SA-marketed generic creams showed pharmaceutical inequivalence to the SA comparator product indicating Q1/Q2/Q3 differences. Despite containing the same excipients as both comparator products, the Canadian generic showed substantially lower release rate compared to the comparator products which could be attributed to Q2/Q3 differences. The IVRT method displayed the requisite ability to assess the various 1% CLZ creams and confirmed the potential of the IVRT method to support a biowaiver for 1% CLZ topical creams.Graphical

Common chemistry, manufacturing, and control deficiencies in abbreviated new drug applications assessed by the US Food and drug administration: Hurdle to access cost-effective medicines

To market a generic product in the United States, it must be registered in Common Technical Document (CTD) format with the US Food and Drug Administration. The Generic Drug User Fee Act went into force in 2012, to expedite the timely review of Abbreviated New Drug Applications (ANDA) by communicating potential defects in the application to the applicant through deficiency letters at different time intervals during the review cycle. This often delays product approval since these deficiencies must be resolved before the product can be approved. In the present study, a study was performed to analyze the recurrent queries for ANDA applications in the CTD quality module from 2013 to 2020, and the probable corrective and preventive action to be taken was drafted. The most frequently occurring queries were observed in the sections titled “Description of manufacturing process and process controls”, “Controls of critical steps and intermediates”, “Specifications (Control of drug product)”, and “Stability data”.

Switching patterns of immediate-release forms of generic mixed amphetamine salts products among privately and publicly insured individuals aged 15-64 years in the United States, 2013-2019.

Immediate-release forms of generic mixed amphetamine salts (MAS) have been the subject of passive surveillance reports signaling lack of effectiveness. We examined switching patterns that might suggest whether long-term users of specific MAS are more likely to switch away or switch back after use of the MAS of interest in the FDA's Sentinel Distributed Database. We required at least 60-day continuous supply of selected MAS grouped by Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) to describe patterns of switching away from and to generics approved under the ANDAs of interest among individuals ages 15-64 years with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder or narcolepsy during 2013-2019. We observed the greatest number of treatment episodes for ANDA 040422 (n = 525 771), followed by ANDA 202424 (n = 181 693), ANDA 040439 (n = 62 363), ANDA 040440 (n = 21 143), and ANDA 040480 (n = 8792). Of those with switches away from their original ANDA, episodes initiated on generic products under ANDA 040422 (48.6%) and ANDA 202424 (43.0%) were most likely to switch back, while those initiated on generic product under ANDA 040480 were least likely (24.1%). Of those episodes with switches to a generic under an ANDA of interest, about one-third (range 27.1% to 37.0%) switched back to the same product. These switches back had a median time to switch of about 30 days. These descriptive analyses, although subject to limitations, did not suggest increased switching away or switching back after use of the generics of interest. Continued post-marketing surveillance is warranted.

A Comparative Study on Approval of Follow-on Version of Sevelamer Carbonate and Glatiramer Acetate (GA) in US, EU

Abstract: Many non-biological drugs, different in terms of their structure and mode of action, pharmacological classification, and therapeutic indication, have a common factor of structural complexity and are grouped as non-biological complex drugs (NBCDs). When an innovator drug nears the time of off-patent, different manufacturers attempt to produce its subsequent version, so the patients will have a cost-effective therapeutic equivalent. Since the innovator molecule is complex, its follow-on drug can be called its true generic version, if its bioavailability, bioequivalence and therapeutic equivalence to the innovator drug are demonstrated. However, it is observed that a case-to-case basis approach is implemented by European Medicines Agency (EMA) and Food and Drug Administration, US (USFDA) in the approval of such drugs and there is no uniformity observed between the two. : In this study, an attempt is made to study the complexity of molecules compare and understand the data requirements, and procedures adopted for the review and approval of such complex products. Therefore, drug sevelamer carbonate and glatiramer acetate are selected for the study. A methodical approach was followed. European assessment reports and drug approvals available in the orange book database of the former two regulatory agencies were studied. It is observed that the generic version of glatiramer acetate is approved as an abbreviated new drug application (ANDA) by Food and Drug Administration whereas the same was approved as the hybrid application by European Medicines Agency requiring the applicant to generate and submit more data. Thus, harmonization of the regulatory requirements for the approval of follow-on versions of such complex drugs is essential for better understanding, predictability of the regulatory process, and acceleration of the drug approval process, in the interest of patients. This will help the faster access of the drugs to the patients and allow interchangeability of the innovator drugs with its cost-effective generic version.

The Prevalence of Several Treatments in Preventing the Back Conversion of Acyl Glucuronide Metabolites in Abbreviated New Drug Applications.

The bioanalysis of drugs that undergo acyl glucuronidation presents an analytical challenge due to poor stability of acyl glucuronide metabolites in biological matrices. The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of back conversion of acyl glucuronide metabolites on drug concentration measurement in bioequivalence (BE) studies submitted to Abbreviated New Drug Applications (ANDAs). The prevalence of several treatments for preventing the back conversion of acyl glucuronide metabolites and the results of incurred sample reanalysis (ISR) were analyzed. In total, 322 ANDAs for 26 drugs known to generate acyl glucuronide metabolites were surveyed. Many studies have applied multiple preventive treatments during the clinical and bioanalytical phases. More than two-thirds (67.2%) of the studies utilized procedures of lowering the temperature for sample collection during clinical phase. Fewer studies have utilized procedures for lowering the pH of plasma samples (12.3%) or adding enzyme inhibitors (4.4%) in the clinical phase. A small fraction (16.9%) validated the pre-study method in the presence of the acyl glucuronide metabolites. The majority (62.2%) of the studies employed the procedure of lowering the pH during the sample extraction process in the bioanalytical phase. Among the studies that had significantly higher (p-value < 0.01 by sign test) ISR results than the corresponding original concentration values, 41 BE studies did not carry out any preventive treatments during the bioanalysis phase, suggesting that back conversion of acyl glucuronide metabolites to parent drugs may be present in these studies. The awareness of appropriate treatments of study samples for possible back-conversions of acyl glucuronide metabolites is expected to assist generic drug applicants in improving the quality of their future applications.

Increasing impact of quantitative methods and modeling in establishment of bioequivalence and characterization of drug delivery.

Increasing impact of quantitative methods and modeling in establishment of bioequivalence and characterization of drug delivery.

Modeling Approaches to Reimagine Stability (MARS) for Enabling Earlier Access to Critical Drugs for Patients with Unmet Medical Needs

FDA's experience to date has shown that completion of stability data requirements is one of the most observed challenges for applicants of New Drug Applications (NDAs) with an expedited review designation. Since NDAs submitted under these expedited pathways often have limited available real-time stability data from the primary batches, Modeling Approaches to Reimagine Stability (MARS) have been proposed to support establishment of tentative retest periods of the drug substance and/or expiration dating period (shelf-life) of the drug product. MARS incorporate statistical principles and available tools as a part of the predictive models. In this study, a data mining exercise has been conducted with regulatory submissions of Investigational New Drug (IND) Applications, NDAs, and Abbreviated New Drug Applications (ANDAs) containing MARS data. The case studies presented herein demonstrate how MARS data has been applied to regulatory scenarios involving prediction of retest and/or shelf-life, bridging major development changes, and confirming that no degradation has been observed or predicted. Using the assumption of a linear time trend for those cases that do not display sufficient degradation to conduct MARS for projection of an expiration date, an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model is developed and described herein to test the hypothesis of zero slope by a p-value method. Our results show that the application of MARS adequately supported establishment of a tentative commercially viable retest date/shelf-life, thus enabling earlier access to critical drugs for patients with unmet medical needs.

Reconciling sprinkle administration information in approved NDA labeling with sprinkle bioequivalence study recommendations in FDA product-specific guidances for generic drug development

Objectives: Certain patient populations (e.g., children and the elderly) may not be able to swallow solid oral dosage forms. In the absence of availability of a dosage form that is appropriate for these patient groups, liquids and/ or soft foods as described in the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved product labeling can be used as a suitable vehicle(s) for oral administration of the specific drug product. The approved labeling of some new drug application (NDA) products contains information for sprinkle administration on liquids or soft foods. Since abbreviated new drug application (ANDA) products must demonstrate bioequivalence (BE) to the reference listed drug (RLD) products, and since the generic drug labeling is the same as RLD, generic applicants are recommended to conduct in vivo BE sprinkle study using one of the soft foods mentioned in RLD labeling. The current FDA guidance specifically recommends that generic applicants conduct a sprinkle BE study if the labeling of a modified-release (MR) RLD product states that the product can be administered sprinkled on soft foods. For ANDAs, such recommendations for in vivo BE sprinkle studies for MR products are routinely communicated in the respective product-specific guidance (PSG) published by FDA and readily available for prospective ANDA applicants. FDA guidance does not recommend sprinkle BE study for an immediate-release (IR) product since the formulation differences between IR generic and RLD products are not expected to impact administration with food vehicle. Materials and Methods: FDALabel and PSG databases were searched for current NDAs with sprinkle labeling and individual PSGs with recommendations for an in vivo sprinkle BE study, respectively. Results from FDALabel were narrowed to NDAs for oral solid dosage forms with approved labeling for sprinkle administration on food vehicles. Only MR NDAs with sprinkle labeling were included in the final analysis as recommended by FDA for inclusion of in vivo sprinkle BE study recommendations in PSGs for generic products. We searched the FDA external PSG database for availability of respective PSGs containing in vivo sprinkle study recommendations for those MR products with approved NDA labeling for sprinkle administration. Results: Of the 57 NDAs with FDA-approved drug products that are labeled to include sprinkle administration, 45 NDAs were MR (tablet, capsule, and granule) products. Forty-two (93%) of the 45 MR products have PSGs with in vivo sprinkle BE study recommendations. Standardized data extraction sheets created by Microsoft Excel 2019 for data extraction were utilized. Conclusion: FDA has a sprinkle-study PSG for almost all currently approved MR NDAs. The results of our study show that in vivo BE study recommendations in PSGs closely match information in the approved drug labeling. Applicants who plan to develop MR generic products should visit the FDA public web page for the availability of the product-specific BE recommendations for the proposed products.

OP55 Classification System For Innovative Medicines In The Pipeline: New Or Repurposed?

IntroductionWhile various criteria exist to define or categorize innovative medicines as new or repurposed, to our knowledge there are no standardized systems that sufficiently capture the range of pipeline products. The National Institute for Health and Care Research Innovation Observatory (NIHR IO) undertakes routine horizon scanning to support health technology assessment (HTA) in England and maintains a comprehensive Medicines Innovation Database (MInD). The aim of this project is to develop a ‘technology type’ (new versus repurposed) classification system for application within the MInD and to provide a high-level analysis of the emergent data.MethodsWe reviewed gray literature, regulatory websites, and drug repositories to identify existing ‘technology type’ classification criteria. Preliminary definitions and classifications for use on the MInD were discussed, refined, and agreed by consensus. Innovative medicines on the MInD were classified as either new or repurposed based on their regulatory approval status (Marketing Authorization) using data from the electronic medicines compendium. For repurposed medicines, further classification was undertaken using abbreviated new drug application (ANDA) data from the FDA Orange Book to identify generic medicines (patency and exclusivity status). We combined a range of semi-automated and manually derived data during this process.ResultsSix technology types were identified and applied to the MInD: (i) new technology; (ii) repurposed technology (on-patent/branded); (iii) repurposed drug (off-patent/generic); (iv) repurposed technology (never commercialized); (v) new and repurposed technology (combinations); and (vi) repurposed technology (combinations). Preliminary analysis of a subset of MInD records identified in July 2021 (n = 113) found mainly 52 percent new technologies, 27 percent new and repurposed technologies (combinations) and 14 percent repurposed technology (never commercialized). Further analysis of approximately 7000 MInD records are ongoing and will report temporal trends, regulatory status, and key challenges.ConclusionsOur novel evidence-based approach to developing classifications for technology types of innovative medicines resulted in six mutually exclusive states that can be applied to a larger dataset. We believe this offers HTA stakeholders a mechanism to gain valuable insights into the innovation trends, gaps, and areas of unmet need.

Exploring drug patent linkage and the first ANDA litigation in China

ABSTRACT Introduction Drug patent linkage is an important mechanism for the early resolution of patent disputes in the pharmaceutical field. Since its establishment in China in mid-2021, the patent linkage system has drawn national and international attention. Areas covered Starting with the development of patent linkage in China, this paper provides an overview of the patent linkage system in connection with the first Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) litigation in China, in which the first-instance and second-instance trials were efficiently finished within the period for the stay of generic approval, and the Intellectual Property Tribunal of China’s Supreme People’s Court made a final decision in August 2022. The U.S. and Chinese patent linkage systems are compared. In addition, current judicial and administrative proceedings of the patent linkage system in China are examined. Expert Opinion The legal framework and infrastructures required for the patent linkage system, including a platform for patent listing, patent certification, stay on generic approval, and first generic exclusivity, have been established in China. Furthermore, the New Drug Application (NDA) holders and ANDA filers are effectively utilizing the system. Accordingly, it has been found that the patent linkage system in China is running efficiently.

Assessment of Manufacturing Related Deficiencies for Modified Release Tablet in Abbreviated New Drug Applications.

Generic drugs play an important role in public health. However, the first review cycle approval rate for Abbreviated New Drug Applications (ANDAs) is generally low. To identify if the drug product (DP) manufacturing related deficiencies are the potential root causes of low first review cycle approval of the modified release (MR) tablet ANDAs, we collected and analyzed the review recommendations from each review discipline and the DP manufacturing (process and facility) related deficiencies for original MR tablet ANDAs submitted between FY17 and FY19. We identified 193 original MR tablet ANDAs. The analysis showed that 12% of the applications were approved in first review cycle, while 88% received complete responses (CR). Of the 169 CR applications, 91% were found inadequate for multiple review disciplines. A total of 1345 DP manufacturing process-related deficiencies were issued to 184 ANDAs during the first review cycle. We have identified common deficiencies across ANDAs based on DP manufacturing process categories. The top deficiencies cited reasons include facilities are out of compliance/not ready to commercialize/not ready for inspection; critical process parameter (CPP) ranges are not proposed/proposed CPP ranges are too wide and/or not supported by studied range and no in-process controls (IPCs) are proposed/proposed IPCs acceptance criteria (limits) are too wide and/or not supported by observed data etc. Avoiding the common DP manufacturing deficiencies may reduce the need for issuing DP manufacturing related deficiencies in information requests (IRs), discipline review letters (DRLs), and CRs for MR tablet ANDAs.

Scientific Considerations for Stability Studies of Drug Substances Supporting Abbreviated New Drug Applications (ANDAs).

We have summarized five high impact issues related to the stability studies for drug substances that are documented in the Type II drug master files (DMFs) supporting Abbreviated New Drug Applications (ANDAs). We intend to provide the scientific considerations for the regulatory policies which bear upon such high-impact issues. We have also provided our perspective to avoid such issues, to reduce the DMF review time, and subsequently to accelerate the approvals of the supporting ANDAs.