Abbreviated Injury Scale Values Research Articles

Settlement Is at the End-Common Trauma Scores Require a Critical Reassessment Due to the Possible Dynamics of Traumatic Brain Injuries in Patients' Clinical Course.

Background: Scientific studies on severely injured patients commonly utilize the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) and the Injury Severity Score (ISS) for injury assessment and to characterize trauma cohorts. However, due to potential deterioration (e.g., in the case of an increasing hemorrhage) during the clinical course, the assessment of injury severity in traumatic brain injury (TBI) can be challenging. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate whether and to what extent the worsening of TBI affects the AIS and ISS. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 80 polytrauma patients admitted to the trauma room of our level I trauma center with computed-tomography-confirmed TBI. The initial AIS, ISS, and Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) values were reevaluated after follow-up imaging. Results: A total of 37.5% of the patients showed a significant increase in AIShead (3.7 vs. 4.1; p = 0.002) and the ISS (22.9 vs. 26.7, p = 0.0497). These changes resulted in an eight percent reduction in their TRISS-predicted survival probability (74.82% vs. 66.25%, p = 0.1835). Conclusions: The dynamic nature of intracranial hemorrhage complicates accurate injury severity assessment using the AIS and ISS, necessitating consideration in clinical studies and registries to prevent systematic bias in patient selection and subsequent data analysis.

Does a given abbreviated injury scale value in different body regions contribute to the same risks of in-hospital mortality and ICU admission in trauma patients?

Objective: We aimed to investigate the hypothesis that identical abbreviated injury scale (AIS) scores may lead to varying risks of in-hospital mortality and admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) depending on the specific body region affected. Methods: This study focused on hospitalized trauma patients with moderate to serious injuries (AIS=2, 3). The final sample was stratified based on the injured body regions. To determine the impact of these injuries on mortality and ICU admission, we conducted binary logistic regression after adjusting for confounding factors. Results: Overall, 16,040 trauma patients with moderate injury (AIS=2) and 1,338 trauma patients with serious injury (AIS=3) were included in this study. When comparing outcome of trauma patients in different body region, there was no significant difference in the odds of two main outcomes in various injury sites, except for extremities (P values>0.05). When the AIS=2 patients were controlled for confounding factors, the adjusted odds of mortality were significantly higher for head, face, and neck injuries, as well as spine/back, thoracic, and abdominal injuries, compared to extremity injuries (adjusted odds ratio (aOR)s=9.81,8.78, 8.11, and 3.96, respectively; P-values<0.05). Among those with AIS=3, the odds of mortality were significantly greater for abdominal (aOR=7.05, P-value=0.009) and head, face, and neck injuries (aOR=2.73, P-value=0.001) than for extremity injuries. Conclusion: Injuries with the same AIS (=2, 3) value almost indistinguishably confer the same mortality risk and ICU admission, except for extremities. The unique AIS value assigned to various body sites almost consistently indicate the same likelihood of negative outcomes.

Does an early, balanced resuscitation strategy reduce the incidence of hypofibrinogenemia in hemorrhagic shock?

ObjectivesSome centers have recommended including concentrated fibrinogen replacement in massive transfusion protocols (MTPs). Given our center’s policy of aggressive early balanced resuscitation (1:1:1), beginning prehospital, we hypothesized that our rates...

Dynamics of frontal crash in/without the presence of passive safety systems

The paper aims to debate on experimental retrieved accelerations from real crash tests, based on different scenarios, to enable assessment on driver potential injury. Scenarios included the presence of passive safety systems (e.g., airbag, seat belt) and test data are being processed to estimate the head injury criteria (HIC) followed by its correlation with abbreviated injury scale values (AIS). A dummy, average male resemblance, was developed in-situ and used in the experimental configuration. Signals were being acquired by few accelerometers disposed on the dummy’s head and thorax using a Pic DAQ system (DSD, Linz, Austria). Data processing and values of injury criteria underline the importance of passive safety systems proven HIC experienced a consistent decrease in the presence of both air-bag and seatbelt.

Non-operative management of blunt splenic injury: is it really so extensively feasible? a critical appraisal of a single-center experience.

IntroductionThe spleen is one of the most commonly injured organ following blunt abdominal trauma. Splenic injuries may occur in isolation or in association with other intra-and extra-abdominal injury. Nonoperative management of blunt injury to the spleen has become routine in children. In adult most minor splenic injuries are readily treated nonoperatively but controversy exists regarding the role of nonoperative management for higher grade injuries above all in multi-trauma patients. The aim of this study is the assessment of splenic trauma treatment, with particular attention to conservative treatment, its limits, its efficiency, and its safety in multi-trauma patient or in a severe trauma patient.MethodsThe present research focused on a retrospective review of patients with splenic injury. The research was performed by analyzing data of the trauma registry of St. Andrea University Hospital in Rome. The St. Andrea University Hospital trauma registry includes 1859. The variables taken into account were spleen injury and general injuries, age, sex, cause and dynamic of trauma, hemoglobin, hematocrit, white blood cells count, INR, number and time blood transfusion, hemodynamic stability, type of treatment provided, hospitalization period, morbidity and mortality. Assessment of splenic injuries was evaluated according to Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS).ResultsThe analysis among the general population of spleen trauma patients identified 68 patients with a splenic injury representing the 41.2% of all abdomen injury. The Average age was of 37.01 ± 17.18 years. The Average ISS value was of 22.88 ± 12.85; mediana of 24.50 (range 4-66). The average Spleen AIS value was of 3.13 ± 0.88; mediana 3.00 (range 2-5). The overall mortality ratio was of 19.1% (13 patients). The average ISS value in patients who died was of 41.92 ± 12.48, whereas in patients who survided was of 23.33 ± 10.15. The difference was considered to be statistically significant (p <0.001). The relashionship between the ISS and AIS values in patients who died was considered directly proportional but not statistically significant (Pearson test AIS/ISS = 0.132, p = n.s.). The initial management was a conservative treatment in 27 patients (39.7%) of them 4 patients (15%) failed, in the other 41 cases urgent splenectomies were performed. The average spleen AIS in all the patients who underwent splenectomy was 3.61 ± 0.63 whereas in the patients who were not treated surgically was 2.42 ± 0.69. The difference was deemed statistically significant (p <0.001).ConclusionSplenic injury, as reported in our statistic as well as in literature, is the most common injury in closed abdominal trauma. Nonoperative management of blunt injury to the spleen in adults has been applied with increasing frequency. However, the criteria for nonoperative management are controversial. The preference of a conservative treatment must be based on the hemodynamic stability indices as well as on the spleen lesion severity and on the general trauma severity. The conservative treatment represent a feasible and safe therapeutic alternative even in case of severe lesions in politrauma patients, but the choice of the treatment form requires an assessment for each singular case.

Trauma patients are safe to fly 72 hours after tube thoracostomy removal.

Current recommendations for safe air travel following traumatic pneumothorax are 2 to 3 weeks after radiographic resolution. These recommendations are based on several small observational studies and expert consensus, which cite a theoretical risk of recurrence and hypoxia because of decreased oxygen tension at altitude. We sought to systematically study the timing of chest drain removal after traumatic pneumothorax and risk of recurrence in relation to air travel. A retrospective cohort study of consecutively admitted patients who sustained a traumatic chest injury treated with tube thoracostomy over a 5-year period was undertaken. Adult patients with a postremoval expiratory chest x-ray demonstrating absence of pneumothorax and at least a 24-hour observation period before flight were eligible for study. All patients were transferred to a participating medical center for continued care. In-flight medical monitoring was available for all patients. Baseline patient characteristics, interval period from drain removal to flight, in-flight medical records, and incidence of radiographic or clinical recurrence of pneumothorax at the destination facility were recorded. Seventy-three patients who met the inclusion criteria were studied. All were male with a median age of 24 years (interquartile range [IQR], 22-26 years), injury severity score of 30 (IQR, 24-38), and chest abbreviated injury scale value of 3 (IQR, 2-4). The majority of patients sustained a penetrating injury (74%). The median duration of tube thoracostomy was 4 days (IQR, 3-6 days). The median period between thoracostomy tube removal and flight was 2.5 days (IQR, 1.5-4 days). Twenty-nine patients (40%) remained mechanically ventilated during transport. There were no reported in-flight medical emergencies for the entire cohort. There were no reported postflight radiographic or clinical recurrences during the subsequent 30 days. After a 72-hour period of observation, air travel after tube thoracostomy removal appears safe for both mechanically ventilated and nonventilated patients. Therapeutic, level IV.

The significance of the levels of fibrin/fibrinogen degradation products for predicting trauma severity

Background: On initial treatment in the emergency room, trauma patients should be assessed using simple clinical indicators that can be measured quickly. Objectives: The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between the injury severity score and blood test parameters measured on emergency room arrival in trauma patients. Methods: Trauma patients transferred to Gunma University Hospital between May 2013 and April 2014 were evaluated in this prospective, observational study. Blood samples were collected immediately on their arrival at our emergency room and their hematocrit, platelet, international normalized ratio of prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, fibrin/fibrinogen degradation products, and D-dimer were measured. We evaluated the correlations between the injury severity score and those biomarkers, and examined whether the correlation varied according to the injury severity score value. We also evaluated the correlations between the biomarkers and the abbreviated injury scale values of six regions. Results: We analyzed 371 patients. Fibrin/fibrinogen degradation products and D-dimer showed the greatest coefficients of correlation with injury severity score (0.556 and 0.543, respectively). The area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic was larger in patients with injury severity score ⩾ 9 than in those with injury severity score ⩾ 4; however, patients with injury severity score ⩾ 9 or ⩾16 showed no significant differences. The area under the curve of fibrin/fibrinogen degradation products was larger than that of D-dimer at all injury severity score values. The chest abbreviated injury scale had the strongest relationship with fibrin/fibrinogen degradation products. Conclusion: Fibrin/fibrinogen degradation products and D-dimer were positively correlated with injury severity score, and the relationships varied according to trauma severity. Chest trauma contributed most strongly to fibrin/fibrinogen degradation product elevation.

Blunt Cerebrovascular Artery Injury and Stroke in Severely Injured Patients: An International Multicenter Analysis.

Blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) is considered to be a rare entity in patients with high-energy trauma and is a potentially preventable cause of secondary brain damage. If it occurs, it may be fatal or associated with poor outcomes related to devastating complications. We hypothesized that analyses of epidemiology and concomitant injuries may predict the development of BCVI and associated complications. The TraumaRegister DGU® (TR-DGU), a prospectively maintained database, was used for retrospective data analysis (01/2009-12/2015). adult trauma patients (≥16years) with severe injuries (ISS≥16 points) with and without BCVI. Subgroups: carotid artery injury (CAI) and vertebral artery injury (VAI). The degree of vascular injury was classified according to the Abbreviated Injury Scale values. Demographic, injury, therapy and outcome characteristic data (length of stay, stroke, multiple organ failure and mortality) were collected and analyzed for each patient with SPSS statistics (Version 23, IBM Inc., Armonk, NY). Out of 76,480 individuals, a total of 786 patients with BCVI (1%) were identified. The 435 CAI patients included 263 dissections, 78 pseudoaneurysms and 94 bilateral injuries. The 383 VAI patients presented with 198 dissections, 43 pseudoaneurysms, 122 thrombotic occlusions and 20 bilateral injuries. The risk for stroke was excessive in BCVI patients versus controls (11.5 vs. 1.1%, p<0.001) and increased with vascular injury severity, up to 24.1% in CAI patients and 30.0% in VAI patients. We confirmed that cervical spine injuries were a major BCVI predictor (OR 6.46, p<0.001, 95% CI 5.34-7.81); furthermore, high-energy mechanisms (OR 1.79), facial fractures (OR 1.56) and general injury severity (OR 1.05) were identified as independent predictors. Basilar skull fractures (BSF) were found with comparable frequency (p=0.63) in both groups, and the predictive value was found to be insignificant (OR 1.1, p=0.36, 95% CI 0.89-1.37). Age≥60years was associated with a decreased risk for BCVI (OR 0.54, p<0.001, 95% CI 0.45-0.65); however, in BCVI patients over 60years of age, mortality was excessive (OR 4.33, p<0.001, 95% CI 2.40-7.80). Even after adjusting for head injuries, BCVI-associated stroke remained a significant risk factor for mortality (OR 2.52, p<0.001, 95% CI 1.13-5.62). Our data validated cervical spine injuries as a major predictor, but the predictive value of BSF must be scrutinized. Patient age appears to play a contradictory role in BCVI risk and BCVI-associated mortality. Predicting which patients will develop BCVI remains an ongoing challenge, especially since many patients do not present with concomitant injuries of the head or spine and therefore might not be captured by standard screening criteria.

Same Abbreviated Injury Scale Values May Be Associated with Different Risks to Mortality in Trauma Patients: A Cross-Sectional Retrospective Study Based on the Trauma Registry System in a Level I Trauma Center.

The Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) measures injury severity of a trauma patient with a numeric method for ranking anatomy-based specific injuries. The summation of the squares of the three most severe injuries in the AIS of six predefined body regions comprises the Injury Severity Score (ISS). It assumes that the mortality of a given AIS value is similar across all body regions. However, such an assumption is less explored in the literature. In this study, we aimed to compare the mortality rates of the patients with the same AIS value in different injured body regions in a level I trauma center. Hospitalized adult trauma patients with isolated serious to critical injury (AIS of 3 to 5) between 1 January 2009, and 31 December 2016, from the Trauma Registry System in a level I trauma center were grouped according to the injured body regions (including, the head/neck, thorax, abdomen, or extremities) and were exclusively compared according to their AIS stratum. Categorical data were compared using the two-sided Fisher exact or Pearson chi-square tests. ANOVA with Games-Howell post hoc test was performed to assess the differences in continuous data of the patients with injury in different body regions. The primary outcome of the study was in-hospital mortality. The adjusted odds ratios (AORs) were estimated using a stepwise selection of a multivariable regression model adjusted by controlling the confounding variables such as sex, age, comorbidities, and ISS. Survival curves were estimated with the Kaplan–Meier approach with a corresponding log-rank test. The patients with AIS of 5 for abdomen injury and those with AIS of 3 for extremity injury had a significantly lower odds of adjusted mortality (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 0.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.01–0.39, p = 0.004 and AOR 0.3, 95% CI 0.15–0.51, p < 0.001, respectively) than that of the patients with head/neck injury. However, the patients with AIS of 4 for extremity injury demonstrated significantly higher odds of adjusted mortality (AOR 8.4, 95% CI 2.84–25.07, p < 0.001) than the patients with head/neck injury. This study found that the risks to mortality in the patients with a given AIS value of serious to critical injury in different injured body regions were not the same, even after controlling for confounding variables such as sex, age, comorbidities, and ISS.

The Value of Injury Severity Score and Abbreviated Injury Scale in the Management of Traumatic Injuries of Parenchymal Abdominal Organs

The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of etiology, types of injury, levels of consciousness and the Injury Severity Score (ISS) and Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) values on the selection of treatment modality and survival in patients with injuries of parenchymal abdominal organs. Case records of 224 patients treated for traumatic injury of parenchymal abdominal organs from January 2003 until December 2015 were reviewed. Th e values of ISS and AIS of injury severity were calculated and compared to the values obtained according to the etiology, state of consciousness and survival. Of the 224 patients, 172 (76.8%) were treated by surgical approach and 52 (23.2%) were treated conservatively. Th e mean patient age was 40.1}18.3 years. Th ere were 97 (43.3%) polytrauma cases. Of the 224 injured patients, 143 (63.8%) were treated with transfusions of blood products. Two hundred and six (92%) patients survived. Th e mean AIS and ISS values were significantly lower in patients that survived (AIS=3; ISS=28) than in those that died (AIS=5; ISS=34) (p< 0.001). There was a statistically significant difference in AIS and ISS values between conscious (AIS=2.7; ISS=25.9) and unconscious (AIS=3.2; ISS=33) patients (p< 0.001). Of the 224 patients that did not survive, 18 (8%) were hemodynamically unstable. Survival depended on hemodynamic stability at admission; the ISS and AIS values were associated with the injuries and state of consciousness at admission. Hemodynamic stability, state of consciousness, and ISS and AIS values were the quality predictors of survival after abdominal traumatic injury.

The exponential function transforms the Abbreviated Injury Scale, which both improves accuracy and simplifies scoring.

We present here the exponential function which transforms the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS). It is called the Exponential Injury Severity Score (EISS), and significantly outperforms the venerable but dated New Injury Severity Score (NISS) and Injury Severity Score (ISS) as a predictor of mortality. The EISS is defined as a change of AIS values by raising each AIS severity score (1-6) by 3 taking a power of AIS minus 2 and then summing the three most severe injuries (i.e., highest AIS), regardless of body regions. EISS values were calculated for every patient in two large independent data sets: 3,911 and 4,129 patients treated during a 6-year period at the Class A tertiary hospitals in China. The power of the EISS to predict mortality was then compared with previously calculated NISS values for the same patients in each of the two data sets. We found that the EISS is more predictive of survival [Zhejiang: area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC): NISS=0.932, EISS=0.949, P=0.0115; Liaoning: AUC: NISS=0.924, EISS=0.942, P=0.0139]. Moreover, the EISS provides a better fit throughout its entire range of prediction (Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic for Zhejiang: NISS=21.86, P=0.0027, EISS=13.52, P=0.0604; Liaoning: NISS=23.27, P=0.0015, EISS=15.55, P=0.0164). The EISS may be used as the standard summary measure of human trauma.

Analysis of child–vehicle collision injuries by vehicle type

PurposeThis study aimed to determine the severity of injuries to each body region of child pedestrians struck by different types of vehicles. MethodsWe collected in-depth data from the Institute for Traffic Accident Research and Data Analysis on pedestrians younger than 13 years with any bodily injuries from collisions with vehicles between 1993 and 2004. ResultsSixty-eight patients with a mean age of 6.9 ± 2.4 years were included in the study. In collisions, vehicles caused higher Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) scores than those from impact with the road. Injury Severity Score and AIS values were higher with one-box or sports utility vehicles compared with those in sedan vehicles, but the differences were not statistically significant. The mean AIS score of head injuries was significantly higher with one-box or sports utility vehicles than that with sedans (1.6 ± 2.1 vs 0.5 ± 1.1, P < .05). The mean AIS score of the lower extremities was significantly higher with sedans than that with one-box or sports utility vehicles (1.2 ± 1.0 vs 0.5 ± 0.9, P < .05). ConclusionsThe type and severity of injuries in child–car collisions vary by type of vehicle and pedestrian kinematics.

A Changing of the Abbreviated Injury Scale that Improves Accuracy and Simplifies Scoring

Objective We present here a changing of the abbreviated injury scale (AIS). It is called the changed injury severity score (CISS), and significantly outperforms the venerable but dated the injury severity score (ISS) and the new injury severity score (NISS) as a predictor of mortality. Methods The CISS is defined as a change of AIS values by raising each AIS severity score (1-6) by a power of 4.12 divided by 30.33 and then summing the three most severe (i.e. highest AIS) regardless of body regions. CISS values were calculated for every patient in two large independent data sets: 3455, 3900 patients treated during a five-year period at the class A grade III comprehensive hospitals in Affiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University (Hangzhou) and Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Zhejiang). The power of CISS to predict morality was then compared with previously calculated NISS values of the same group patients in the two hospitals. Results We found CISS was more accurate than NISS to predict the survival. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) of NISS and CISS in Hangzhou were 0.919 and 0.937 respectively (p=0.026), whereas for Zhejiang were 0.917 and 0.940 respectively (p=0.022). Moreover, CISS provided a better fit throughout its entire range of prediction. Hosmer-Lemeshow (H-L) statistic for NISS and CISS in Hangzhou were 24.00 (p=0.002) and 19.38 (p=0.007), whereas in Zhejiang were 22.70 (p=0.001) and 18.43 (p=0.005) respectively. Conclusions CISS is a modified version of NISS/ISS with better statistical property and can be considered in trauma research.

Differences Between Groups

Compared with the group of normotensive patients (group “Normotension”), the group of patients with persistent hypertension (“Hypertension”) showed the worst results, except for hypotensive patients (“Hypotension”). The fact that hypotension in trauma patients is correlated with a poorer outcome is hardly the subject of controversy (1). Closer consideration of the groups “Normotension” and “Hypertension” raises attention for the fact that two dissimilar groups were compared: The patients in the “Hypertension” group had more combination injuries. The relative sum of separate injury entities to the cranium (for example, epidural hematoma, subdural hematoma, cranial fracture) was 136.2% compared with 107.9% in the “Normotension” group. The main reason for this is the high proportion of subdural hematomas in the “Hypertension” group (41% vs. 24.4%). Mortality due to acute subdural hematoma is high, in spite of early surgical treatment, at 40–60% (2). Unfortunately, the proportional distribution of the Abbreviated Injury Scale values for the head was not further analyzed in the respective subgroups. An explanation for the fact that the patients in the “Hypertension” group had a lower injury severity score, in spite of their suspected more serious head injuries, may be the lower frequency of severe comorbid injuries (AIS =3) to the thorax, abdomen, and extremities (37.7% vs. 75.1%). Furthermore, the average age of patients in the hypertension group was notably higher (59.7 years vs. 41.2 years). This is a further factor for a poorer prognosis (3). It remains unclear whether the lower rate of preclinical intubations in the “Hypertension” group affected the result. I am not intending to call into question a possible association between hypertension and poor outcomes after traumatic brain injury. However, the conclusion reached by the authors is not supported by their data. The subgroups are far too lacking in homogeneity for confounders to be ruled out.

The Natural Logarithm Transforms the Abbreviated Injury Scale That Improves Accuracy Scoring

The Injury Severity Score (ISS) and the New Injury Severity Score (NISS) are widely used for anatomic severity assessments, but they do not display a linear relation to mortality. The mortality rates are significantly different between pairs of the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) triplets that generate the same ISS/NISS total. The Logarithm Injury Severity Score (LISS) is defined as a change in AIS values by raising each AIS severity score (1-6) by taking the natural logarithm to a power of 5.53 multiplied by 1.7987 and then adding the three most severe injuries (i.e. highest AIS), regardless of body region. LISS values were calculated for every patient in three large independent data sets: 3,784, 4,436, and 4,018 patients treated over a six-year period at Class A tertiary comprehensive hospitals in China. The power of LISS to predict morality was then compared with previously calculated NISS values for the same patients in each of the three data sets. We found that LISS is more predictive of survival as well (Hangzhou: receiver operating characteristic (ROC): NISS=0.931, LISS=0.949, p=0.006; Similarly, Zhejiang and Shenyang: ROC NISS vs. LISS, p<0.05). Moreover, LISS provides a better fit throughout its entire range of predicting (Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic for Hangzhou NISS=15.76, p=0.027; LISS=13.79, p=0.055; Similarly, for Zhejiang and Shenyang). LISS should be used as the standard summary measure of human trauma.

Specific Abbreviated Injury Scale Values Are Responsible for the Underestimation of Mortality in Penetrating Trauma Patients by the Injury Severity Score

The Injury Severity Score (ISS) is widely used as a method for rating severity of injury. The ISS is the sum of the squares of the three worst Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) values from three body regions. Patients with penetrating injuries tend to have higher mortality rates for a given ISS than patients with blunt injuries. This is thought to be secondary to the increased prevalence of multiple severe injuries in the same body region in patients with penetrating injuries, which the ISS does not account for. We hypothesized that the mechanism-based difference in mortality could be attributed to certain ISS ranges and specific AIS values by body region. Outcome and injury scoring data were obtained from transfused patients admitted to 23 Level I trauma centers. ISS values were grouped into categories, and a logistic regression model was created. Mortality for each ISS category was determined and compared with the ISS 1 to 15 group. An interaction term was added to evaluate the effect of mechanism. Additional logistic regression models were created to examine each AIS category individually. There were 2,292 patients in the cohort. An overall interaction between ISS and mechanism was observed (p = 0.049). Mortality rates between blunt and penetrating patients with an ISS between 25 and 40 were significantly different (23.6 vs. 36.1%; p = 0.022). Within this range, the magnitude of the difference in mortality was far higher for penetrating patients with head injuries (75% vs. 37% for blunt) than truncal injuries (26% vs. 17% for blunt). Penetrating trauma patients with an AIS head of 4 or 5, AIS abdomen of 3, or AIS extremity of 3 all had adjusted mortality rates higher than blunt trauma patients with those values. Significant differences in mortality between blunt and penetrating trauma patients exist at certain ISS and AIS category values. The mortality difference is greatest for head injured patients.

Serial White Blood Cell Counts in Trauma: Do They Predict a Hollow Viscus Injury?

The significance of serial white blood cell (WBC) counts in trauma patients with a suspected hollow viscus injury (HVI) is unknown. The purpose of this study was to examine the role of serial WBC counts in the diagnosis of a HVI. After institutional review board approval, all injured patients admitted to a Level I trauma center from January 2003 to December 2007 with at least one WBC measurement were included in a retrospective analysis. The WBC profiles for patients with a HVI were compared against those without HVI. All WBC counts are reported as [x10(3)/microL]. The mean WBC count of the overall study population (n = 5,950) on admission was 11.6 +/- 5.3. Overall, 59.2% had an elevated WBC count on admission. A significant relationship between increasing Injury Severity Score and increasing WBC count on admission was found by linear regression. When comparing patients with HVI (n = 267) with patients without HVI (n = 5,683), no significant difference was found for admission WBC count. The highest WBC count within the first 24 hours for patients with HVI was 16.7 +/- 4.7. This was significantly higher than that for the 4,520 patients without any intraabdominal injury (13.0 +/- 5.2, adjusted p < 0.001). Penetrating injury, a concomitant severe thoracic trauma (chest Abbreviated Injury Scale value >or=3), and highest WBC count >or=20.0 in the first 24 hours were independent risk factors for HVI. A maximal WBC count <or=12.5 in the first 24 hours was independently associated with a lower incidence of HVI. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the highest WBC count in the first 24 hours for predicting HVI was 0.723 (95% CI: 0.656-0.790). Multiple variables likely impact the WBC count in trauma patients. WBC count elevation on admission is nonspecific and does not predict the presence of a HVI. With serial measurements, WBC counts >or=20.0 are independently associated with a HVI, whereas counts <or=12.5 rule against the presence of HVI. However, the sensitivity of these cutoff values to predict a HVI is poor. The diagnostic value of serial WBC counts for predicting a HVI within the first 24 hours after trauma is very limited.

Proximal external carotid artery embolization as a damage control resuscitation technique for combined severe traumatic brain injury with uncontrolled oronasal haemorrhage and severe pelvic fracture in haemorrhagic shock

calculated as heart rate/systolic blood pressure) was 1.5. The patient received nasal packing and initial fluid administration of 2 l of Ringer’s lactate, and subsequently recovered haemodynamically stable. The findings of focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) and chest X-ray were interpreted as normal. Pelvic X-ray showed the multiple pelvic fractures. Cranial computed tomography (CT) scan showed traumatic sabarachnoid haemorrhage, cerebral contusion and facial fractures. Enhanced CT scan from the chest, abdomen, and pelvis showed left pneumohaemothorax, left lung contusion, right renal injury and pelvic fractures with large haematoma that compressed the bladder with contrast medium extravasation. The injury severity score (ISS), which was based on the abbreviated injury scale (AIS) severity values and derived from the sum of the squares of the highest AIS values from each of three most severity injured body regions was 48. 10 The AIS was 4 for the head, 4 for the chest, and 4

Risk factors for blunt thoracic aortic injury in children

Background/Purpose Because blunt thoracic aortic injury is rare in children, a high index of suspicion is needed to identify this injury. The purpose of this study was to use a large national trauma database to define the risk factors for blunt thoracic aortic injury in children. Methods Using the National Trauma Database, the authors compared patient demographics, mechanism of injury, and associated injuries between children sustaining blunt trauma with and without a thoracic aortic injury. Factors independently associated with this injury were identified using multivariate methods. Results Among 26,940 children with a blunt mechanism of injury, 34 (0.1%) children sustained a thoracic aortic injury, 14 (41%) of whom died. Thoracic aortic injuries were independently associated with age, injury sustained as an occupant in a motor vehicle crash, and severe injuries (Abbreviated Injury Scale value of ≥3) involving the head, thorax (other than aorta), abdomen, and lower extremities. Conclusions Older children involved in a motor vehicle crash with severe head, torso, and lower extremity injuries are a group at high risk for injury to the thoracic aorta. These easily identifiable risk factors may facilitate more rapid identification of this rare and potentially fatal injury.

Too many pediatric trampoline injuries.

Recent reports note a dramatic increase in the number of pediatric trampoline injuries (PTI) during the past several years. In 1996, the US Consumer Product Safety Commission estimates that 83 000 patients received treatment for trampoline injuries in US hospital emergency departments (EDs), and that approximately 75% of these patients were <15 years of age. We sought to review our experience with PTI since our previous report (Pediatrics 1992;89:849), and to determine if the American Academy of Pediatrics' current (Pediatrics 1981;67:438) safety recommendations are adequate. Retrospective medical record review of all PTI patients presenting to the pediatric ED from November 1990 through November 1997. A total of 727 PTI patients were included; medical records were unavailable for 3 patients. The annual number of PTI nearly tripled during the study period, from 51 in 1991 to a peak of 148 in 1996. PTI patients were 53% female, with a median age of 7 years; 37% were <6 years of age. Privately owned trampolines accounted for 99% of PTI. Most injuries (66%) occurred on the trampoline, 28% resulted from falls off, and 4% from imaginative mechanisms. One hundred eleven patients (15%) suffered severe injury (1990 Abbreviated Injury Scale value >/=3), usually of an extremity (89 out of 111). Fractures occurred in 324 patients (45%). Spinal injuries were common (12%), including 7 patients with cervical or thoracic fractures, and 1 with C7 paraplegia. Fractures were more frequently associated with falls off the trampoline, whereas spinal injuries more frequently occurred on the trampoline. Eighty patients (11%) required prehospital medical transport to our ED, 584 (80%) had ED radiographs, and 382 (53%) required pediatric surgical subspecialty involvement. Seventeen percent of PTI patients (125 out of 727) were admitted to the hospital, including 9 to the pediatric intensive care unit; 99 (14%) required one or more operations. Mean hospital stay was 2 days (range, 1-63 days); 24 stays (19%) were for >/=3 days. We estimate that the hospital charges for the acute medical care of PTI study patients at our institution totaled approximately $700 000. PTI are dramatically increasing in number, and result in considerable childhood morbidity. Most PTI occur on privately owned trampolines. Few, if any, safety recommendations for the trampoline are followed. We support recommendations for a ban on the recreational, school, and competitive pediatric use of trampolines.