The reaction energy profile for H2 + OH → H + H2O was computed using HF, MP2, MP4, QCISD, G1, G2, and G2MP2 ab initio methods. In addition, the B3LYP, B3P86, B3PW91, BLYP, BP291, and SVWN density functional theory (DFT) methods were also used. All the ab initio methods, with the exception of the G series, produced much higher activation barriers and heats of reaction than the experimental values. On the other hand, the DFT methods produced negative forward and reverse barriers which were too low, with the exception of the hybrid DFT methods. The G2 ab initio method generated energies which deviated from the experimental values by ∼ 1 kcal/mol and therefore should be considered a very accurate computational method. The hybrid DFT methods produced positive forward reaction barriers with energies that were 2–4 kcal/mol lower than the experimental values. The geometries of the transition state and energies computed by the ab initio and DFT methods were compared. These results suggest that, in the hybrid exchange functional, the portion of the Slater exchange term should be increased. This may be the reason why the computed energies were too low. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Int J Quant Chem 62: 639–644, 1997
Read full abstract