AAA-related Deaths Research Articles

Mortality trends, gender, and racial disparities in older adults due to abdominal aortic aneurysm: A nationwide cross-sectional analysis

Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) are a significant vascular pathology in older adults, often asymptomatic but with high mortality upon rupture. Despite advancements in diagnostic imaging and surgical interventions, AAAs remain a public health concern. This research letter analyzed CDC WONDER data on AAA-related deaths (ICD-10 I71.3 and I71.4) among US adults aged 65+ from 1999 to 2020. Age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) and annual percent change (APC) were calculated by year, gender, age group, race/ethnicity, geography, and urbanization status. Between 1999 and 2020, there were 180,037 reported deaths in older adults due to AAA. The overall AAMR decreased from 32.6 to 13.2 per 100,000, with a significant decline from 2014 to 2020 (APC: −1.66; 95% CI: −2.48 to −0.48). Older men had a significantly higher AAMR than older women (31.2 vs. 12). Among racial and ethnic groups, Non-Hispanic (NH) Whites had the highest AAMR at 21.7, followed by NH American Indian or Alaska Native (14.5), NH Black (12.6), NH Asian or Pacific Islander (10.1), and Hispanic populations (8.4). Additionally, non-metropolitan areas exhibited higher AAMRs compared to metropolitan areas (23.9 vs. 18.7). While mortality rates have declined, disparities remain, with higher rates among older men, NH Whites, and non-metropolitan residents, highlighting the need for targeted and equitable interventions.

Infrarenal Aortic Treatment With AFX2 Endograft: Results From a Multicentric, International, Non-Randomized, Prospective Registry-the AFX2-LIVE Study.

To confirm real-world clinical practice results reported with anatomically fixed bifurcated endograft, a physician-initiated study was designed-AFX2-LIVE registry. From November 2019 to August 2021, investigators enrolled all consecutive patients treated with AFX2 (Endologix Inc., Irvine, CA, USA) endograft. Patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs), penetrating aortic ulcers (PAU), and isolated infrarenal aortic dissections were included. Clinical and anatomical data, including baseline, intraoperative, and in-hospital details, as well as follow-up data, were collected in an anonymized prospectively compiled database. The primary endpoint of this study was to evaluate the technical and clinical success of endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) using AFX2 endograft. A total of 535 patients were enrolled from 43 Italian and Spanish centers and analyzed according to the protocol. Four hundred eighty-nine patients were male (91.4%), with a mean age of 75±8.92 years (range 52-94). Four hundred sixty-six patients (87.1%) were treated for AAA, 49 (9.3%) for PAU, and 20 (3.6%) for isolated abdominal aortic dissection. A proximal extension was needed in 48% of the cases. Assisted technical success was achieved in all but one patient (99.8%). At 30 days follow-up, no AAA-related deaths were recorded, and nine patients (1.6%) required reintervention. At a mean follow-up period of 15.22±13.65 (range 1-53) months, data were available for 479 patients (89.5%). Clinical success was achieved in 98.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 96.4-99.1) at 3 months, 93.9% (95% CI: 90.1-96.1) at 1 year, and 74.1% (95% CI: 62.8-82.4) at 4 years follow-up. The estimated freedom from all-cause mortality was 97.7%, 93.4%, 81.6%, 77.5%, and 70.9%, and freedom from AAA-related mortality was 100%, 99.6%, 99.6%, 99.6%, and 97.3% at 3, 12, 24, 36, and 48 months, respectively. Twenty reinterventions (3.7%) were required in 19 patients, of which 3 late open conversions (0.6%) were performed, and 2 AAA-related deaths were observed. This study demonstrated excellent clinical and technical success rates of EVAR with anatomically fixed endografts, providing valuable insights into real-world clinical outcomes. The AFX2-LIVE study could have a significant impact by providing robust evidence supporting the effectiveness and safety of EVAR using bifurcated endografts with anatomical fixation in real-world clinical practice, ultimately leading to improved outcomes and enhanced patient care in the management of abdominal aortic pathologies.

Thirty-Nine Percent of Patients with a Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA) Have an Incidentally Detected AAA Prior to Rupture

IntroductionAbdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) screening has been offered to 65-year-old men living in Oslo, Norway, since May 2011. A significant number of AAA-related deaths occurred in individuals who are not eligible for screening. The primary aim of this study was to describe the group of patients admitted to Oslo University Hospital with a ruptured AAA after the implementation of the local AAA screening project. The following parameters were investigated: AAA detection prior to rupture, surveillance status, eligibility for screening and comorbidities. We also sought to compare outcomes (repair rates and 30-day mortality) between patients with and without an AAA detected prior to rupture. MethodsThis cohort study included patients admitted acutely to Oslo University Hospital due to a symptomatic or ruptured AAA in the period January 2011 to December 2022. Data on demographics, prior AAA detection, surveillance status, treatment and mortality were collected retrospectively through electronic medical records. ResultsWe identified 200 patients with a symptomatic or ruptured AAA, among which 79 (40%) had an AAA detected prior to rupture – one (1%) through screening and 78 (39%) incidentally. Up to 30% of the incidentally detected AAAs were not under any surveillance. Six patients were found eligible for screening: one had attended, three were non-attenders and two had not been invited. Patients with an incidentally detected AAA prior to rupture had a more advanced age and a significantly higher degree of comorbidities than patients without a previously detected AAA, and the repair rates in these groups were 56% and 84% respectively (p < 0.001). Adjusted for comorbidities and risk factors, the odds ratio for repair among patients with incidentally detected AAA was 0.56 (p = 0.292). The 30-day mortality was not significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.097). ConclusionMost patients with a ruptured AAA were not eligible for screening, but 39% of the patients had an incidentally detected AAA prior to rupture. Standardized reporting and follow-up of incidentally detected AAAs is thus identified as an additional measure to organized screening in the effort to reduce AAA-related mortality.

One-time screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in Ontario, Canada: a model-based cost-utility analysis.

Screening programs for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) are not available in Canada. We sought to determine the effectiveness and costutility of AAA screening in Ontario. We compared one-time ultrasonography-based AAA screening for people aged 65 years to no screening using a fully probabilistic Markov model with a lifetime horizon. We estimated life-years, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), AAA-related deaths, number needed to screen to prevent 1 AAA-related death and costs (in Canadian dollars) from the perspective of the Ontario Ministry of Health. We retrieved model inputs from literature, Statistics Canada, and the Ontario Case Costing Initiative. Screening reduced AAA-related deaths by 84.9% among males and 81.0% among females. Compared with no screening, screening resulted in 0.04 (18.96 v. 18.92) additional life-years and 0.04 (14.95 v. 14.91) additional QALYs at an incremental cost of $80 per person among males. Among females, screening resulted in 0.02 (21.25 v. 21.23) additional life-years and 0.01 (16.20 v. 16.19) additional QALYs at an incremental cost of $11 per person. At a willingness-to-pay of $50 000 per year, screening was cost-effective in 84% (males) and 90% (females) of model iterations. Screening was increasingly cost-effective with higher AAA prevalence. Screening for AAA among people aged 65 years in Ontario was associated with fewer AAA-related deaths and favourable cost-effectiveness. To maximize QALY gains per dollar spent and AAA-related deaths prevented, AAA screening programs should be designed to ensure that populations with high prevalence of AAA participate.

Association between the non-HDL-cholesterol to HDL- cholesterol ratio and abdominal aortic aneurysm from a Chinese screening program

BackgroundAbdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) can result in high mortality upon rupture but are usually undiagnosed because of the absence of symptoms in the early stage. Ultrasound screening is regarded as an impactful way to prevent the AAA-related death but cannot be performed efficiently; therefore, a target population, especially in Asia, for this procedure is lacking. Additionally, although dyslipidaemia and atherosclerosis are associated with AAA. However, it remains undetermined whether the non-high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol to high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol ratio (NHHR) is associated with AAA. Therefore, this study was aimed at examining whether NHHR is associated with AAA.MethodA total of 9559 participants who underwent AAA screening at Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital and through screening in two communities in Dongguan, from June 2019 to June 2021 joined in this screening program. The diagnosis of AAA was confirmed by the ultrasound examination of the abdominal aorta rather than any known or suspected AAA. Clinical and laboratory data of participants were collected. The participants were separated into a normal group and an AAA group according to the abdominal aortic status. To eliminate confounding factors, a propensity score matching (PSM) approach was utilized. The independent relationship between NHHR and AAA was assessed through the utilization of multivariable logistic regression analysis. In addition, internal consistency was evaluated through subgroup analysis, which controlled for significant risk factors.ResultsOf all the participants, 219 (2.29%) participants were diagnosed with AAA. A significant elevation in NHHR was identified in the AAA group when contrasted with that in the normal group (P < 0.001). As demonstrated by the results of the multivariable logistic regression analysis, AAA was independently associated with NHHR before (odds ratio [OR], 1.440, P < 0.001) and after PSM (OR, 1.515, P < 0.001). Significant extension was observed in the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs) of NHHR compared to those of single lipid parameters before and after PSM. An accordant association between NHHR and AAA in different subgroups was demonstrated by subgroup analysis.ConclusionIn the Chinese population, there is an independent association between NHHR and AAA. NHHR might be propitious to distinguish individuals with high risk of AAA.

Patent iliolumbar artery increase no risk of type II endoleaks after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm: a case-control study.

The aims of the present study were to explore the risk factors for type 2 endoleaks (T2ELs) after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and the association between T2ELs and the iliolumbar artery. A single-center, retrospective case-control study in West China Hospital was conducted among patients with infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) who underwent EVAR between June 2010 and June 2019. The associations of patient characteristics, anatomical factors, internal iliac artery embolization, and ILA with the primary outcome were analyzed. The secondary objective was to analyze survival and reintervention between the T2EL group and the non-T2EL group. Kaplan-Meier survival, propensity matching analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used. A total of 603 patients were included. The median follow-up was 51 months (range 5.0-106.0). There was a significant difference in the diameter of the lumbar artery (LA), middle sacral artery (MSA) and inferior mesentery artery (IMA), proportion of thrombus and LA numbers. The univariate analysis showed that T2ELs were more likely to develop more thrombus in aneurysm cavity (OR = 0.294, p = 0.012), larger MSA (OR = 1.284, p = 0.04), LA (OR = 1.520, p = 0.015), IMA (OR = 1.056, p < 0.001) and more LAs (OR = 1.390, p = 0.019). The multivariate analysis showed that the number of LAs (HR: 1.349, 95% CI: 1.140-1.595, p < .001) and the diameter of the IMA (HR: 1.328, 95% CI: 1.078-1.636, p = 0.008) were significantly associated with T2ELs. There were no new findings from the propensity score matching. The reintervention-free survival rates were significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.048). Overall survival and AAA-related death rates were not different between the two group. This was consistent with the PSM analysis. The iliolumbar artery and the different internal iliac artery interventions may not increase the incidence of T2ELs. But the numbers of LAs and IMA diameter were independent risk factors for T2Els. T2ELs was associated with the reintervention but did not affect long-term survival or increase aneurysm-related mortality after EVAR.

Eleven-Year Outcomes of a Screening Project for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA) in 65-Year-Old Men.

Since 2011, the Department of Vascular Surgery at Oslo University Hospital has offered screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) to 65-year-old men living in Oslo, Norway. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the screening project on AAA-related mortality and rupture and repair rates in the screened population. This cohort study included men that participated in AAA screening at the Department of Vascular Surgery at Oslo University Hospital in the period May 2011 to September 2019. All men with screen-detected AAA (aortic diameter ≥30 mm) and subaneurysmal aortic dilatation (aortic diameter 25-29 mm) were included. A stratified (1:1 with the subaneurysm group), randomized selection of men with normal aortic diameter (<25 mm) upon screening was also included. The follow-up data on events (ruptures, repairs, and deaths) after screening were collected retrospectively from patient electronic medical records at Oslo University Hospital, the National Population Register and the Norwegian Cause of Death Registry (CoDR). In total, 2048 men were included, with a median follow-up time of 7.1 years (IQR 3.8). Among men with screen-detected AAA, 0.6% died of AAA-related causes (0.9 AAA-related deaths per 1000 person-years). The rupture rate was 0.3% among men with screen-detected AAA or subaneurysmal aortic dilatation, giving an incidence of 0.5 ruptures per 1000 person-years. The overall repair rate in the AAA group was 20.6% (36.1 repairs per 1000 person-years) and 0.6% (0.9 repairs per 1000 person-years) in the subaneurysm group. In a population screened for AAA, the incidence of rupture and the AAA-related mortality was very low. Almost one-fifth of the participants with screen-detected AAA underwent elective repair, representing a group that might have presented with rupture if untreated. These results indicate that screening is valuable in preventing AAA rupture and AAA-related mortality.

Preoperative factors affecting long-term mortality in patients survived to ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate preoperative factors affecting long-term mortality in patients survived to surgical repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAAs). From January 2007 to December 2021, 444 patients have been treated for symptomatic or ruptured aortoiliac aneurysms in two tertiary referral centers. Only 405 with diagnosis of rAAA at computed tomography were included in the present study. Initial outcome measures were assessed during at 30 and 90 days post-treatment. Estimated 10-year survival of patients survived after 90 days from the index procedure was evaluated with Kaplan-Meier Test. Uni- and multivariate analyses of the preoperative factors affecting 10-year survival in survivor patients was performed by means of log-rank and multivariate Cox regression analysis. Among included patients, 94 (23.3%) underwent endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) and 311 (76.8%) open surgical repair (OSR). Intraoperative death occurred in 29 patients (7.2%). At 30 days, overall death rate was 24.2% (98/405 cases). Hemorrhagic shock (HR 15.5, 95% CI 3.5 to 41.1, P<0.001) was an independent predictor for 30-day mortality. The overall rate of 90-day mortality was 32.6%. In survivors estimated survival rates at 1, 5, and 10 years were 84.2%, 58.2%, and 33.3%, respectively. Type of treatment (OSR vs. EVAR) did not affect long-term freedom from AAA-related death (HR 0.6, P=0.42). In survivor patients, multivariate analysis confirmed the association between late mortality and female sex (HR 4.7, 95% CI 3.8 to 5.9, P=0.03), age >80 years (HR 28.5, 95% CI 25.1 to 32.3, P<0.001), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HR 5.2, 95% CI 4.3 to 6.3, P=0.02). Late freedom from AAA-related death was not affected by the type of treatment (EVAR vs. OSR) in patients undergoing urgent repair for rAAA. In survivors, female gender, elderly age, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease negatively affected long-term survival.

Reintervention rate after infrarenal aortic aneurysm repair is lower for open than endovascular repair with aneurysm sac shrinkage: a fifteen-year study.

The aim of this study was to report long-term results of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in a single tertiary Hospital. One thousand seven hundred seventy-seven consecutive AAA repairs (2003-2018) were included. Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, AAA-related mortality, reinterventions rate. Open repair (OSR) was offered in case the patient had a functional capacity ≥4 metabolic equivalents (MET), and a predicted >10 year life expectancy. Endovascular repair (EVAR) was offered in case of hostile abdomen, presence of anatomic feasibility for standard endovascular graft, and <4 MET. Sac shrinkage was defined as a reduction of both anterior-posterior and latero-lateral diameter of the sac of at least 5 mm at the last follow-up vs. the first post- operative follow-up imaging. Eight hundred twenty-eight (47%) OSRs and 949 (53%) EVARs were performed 90.6% (N.=1610) were male, mean age was 73.8 years. Mean follow-up was 79 (SD: 51) months. 30-day mortality was 0.7% (N.=6) and 0.6% (N.=6) for OSR and EVAR respectively (P=1). Long-term survival was better for OSR as expected by the selection criteria used (P<0.001), while AAA-related death was similar in the OSR vs. EVAR group (P=0.37); 664 (70%) sac shrinkages occurred at the last follow-up in the EVAR group. Freedom from reintervention was 97% and 96% at 1 year, 96.5% and 88.4% at 5 years, 95.8% vs. 81.7% at 10 years, and 94.6% vs.72.3% at 15 years for OSR and EVAR, respectively (P<0.001). The reintervention rate was significantly lower in the sac shrinkage vs. no-sac shrinkage subgroup and but higher than the OSR (P≤0.001). Any statistical difference was found for the survival outcome in case of sac shrinkage (P=0.1). Open repair of an infrarenal AAA had a lower reintervention rate than EVAR even in case of a shrinked sac at a long-term follow-up. Further studies with greater sample size are needed.

Your New Year’s “resolution”—check your “screen!”

Your New Year’s “resolution”—check your “screen!”

Japanese single-center experience of abdominal aortic aneurysm repair over 20years: should open or endovascular aneurysm repair be performed first?

The present study analyzed the outcomes of our experience with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair over 20years using endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) with commercially available devices or open aortic repair (OAR) and reviewed our surgical strategy for AAA. From 1999 to 2019, 1077 patients (659 OAR, 418 EVAR) underwent AAA repair. The OAR and EVAR groups were compared retrospectively, and a propensity matching analysis was performed. EVAR was first introduced in 2008. Our strategy was changed to an EVAR-first strategy in 2010. Beginning in 2018, this EVAR-first strategy was changed to an OAR-first strategy. After propensity matching, the overall survival in the OAR group was significantly better than that in the EVAR group at 10years (p = 0.006). Two late deaths due to AAA rupture were identified in the EVAR group, although there were no significant differences between the OAR and EVAR groups with regard to the freedom from AAA-related death at 10years. The rate of freedom from aortic events at 10years was significantly higher in the OAR group than in the EVAR group (p < 0.0001). The rates of freedom from AAA-related death in both the OAR and EVAR groups were favorable, and the rate of freedom from aortic events was significantly lower in the EVAR group than in the OAR group. Close long-term follow-up after EVAR is mandatory.

EndoSuture aneurysm repair versus fenestrated aneurysm repair in patients with short neck abdominal aortic aneurysm.

The aim of this study was to compare midterm results of EndoAnchors in EndoSuture aneurysm repair (ESAR) versus fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR) in short neck abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). All patients who underwent an ESAR procedure for a short neck AAA at our center between September 2017 and May 2020 were considered for analysis. To form the control group, preoperative computed tomography angiography of patients who underwent FEVAR for juxtarenal AAA between April 2012 and May 2020 were reviewed and patients who met short neck criteria selected. A propensity-matched score on neck length and neck diameter was calculated, resulting in 18 matched pairs. AAA shrinkage, type Ia endoleaks (EL), AAA-related reinterventions, and AAA-related deaths were compared. The median AAA diameter was 54mm (interquartile range [IQR], 52-61mm) versus 58mm (IQR, 53-63mm) with a median neck length of 8mm (IQR, 6-12mm) vs 10mm (IQR, 6-13mm) in ESAR and FEVAR patients, respectively. Technical success was 100% in both groups. Procedural success was 94% in the ESAR group versus 100% in the FEVAR group. The median procedure duration was 138mm (IQR, 113-182mm) vs 240mm (IQR, 199-293mm) ( P< .001) and the median length of stay was 2days (IQR, 2-3days) vs 7days (IQR, 6-7days) (P< .001) in ESAR and FEVAR patients, respectively. No major hospital complications were observed in ESAR patients compared with two in FEVAR patients (11%) with one transient acute kidney injury and one transient paraplegia. The median follow-up was 23months (IQR, 19-33months) vs 36months (IQR, 22-57months) with 67% versus 61% AAA shrinkage in the ESAR and FEVAR groups, respectively (P= .73). No type Ia EL, proximal neck-related reinterventions, or AAA-related deaths were observed in either group. No AAA-related reintervention was observed in the ESAR group versus three reinterventions in the FEVAR group (P= .23). ESAR seems to be a safe technique with no major postoperative complications or reinterventions observed during follow-up. It seems to offer similar midterm results as FEVAR in terms of type Ia EL, aneurysm shrinkage, and aneurysm-related mortality. ESAR seems to be a good off-the-shelf alternative to FEVAR in case of technical constraints.

Endografts for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms with a hostile neck anatomy: A systematic review.

BackgroundEndovascular aortic repair (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) has emerged as a better alternative to conventional open surgery for AAAs. The purpose of the review is to define the improvement in the clinical management of the patient with hostile neck AAAs due to the introduction of new endografts while giving a thorough description of their instructions for use (IFUs), main characteristics and part sizing, reporting their outcomes from clinical studies and categorizing their usability.MethodsA MEDLINE search was conducted using keyword-specific combinations. Clinical studies were searched via the clinicaltrials.gov website. Relevant articles' references were also hand-searched.ResultsWe retrieved 640 records describing Alto, Ovation iX, Treovance, Aorfix, Anaconda, Conformable, and Endurant II/IIs endografts. Aortic necks >60° can be managed with Anaconda, Aorfix, and Conformable, which can treat up to 90° necks requiring ≥15 mm (Anaconda ≥20 mm), and Treovance, which is eligible for necks ≤75° with ≥15 mm length. Ovation's innovation of combining polymer-filled O-rings with integral anchors can treat conical necked AAAs giving Ovation iX and Alto an advantage. Short-necked AAAs can be treated with Alto, eligible for necks as short as 7 mm, and Endurant II, which can treat ≥10 mm necks or 4 mm if used in conjunction with the EndoAnchors system, respectively. Alto and Conformable report a 100% technical success rate, absence of AAA-related death, migration, ruptures, and limb occlusion during follow-up. Endurant II and Ovation iX report >99% technical success rate and are almost free from the AAA mortality rate, ruptures, migration, and limb occlusion, while Ovation iX has a high rate of sac dilation (15.5%) in a 5-year follow-up. Anaconda is slightly better than Aorfix and Treovance, which are related to the lowest technical success rates, 98.3%, 96.3%, and 96%, respectively. Aorfix has the highest AAA mortality rate, 4% in a 60 month follow-up.ConclusionMost new generation endografts described have comparable results. They broaden the eligibility of patients for EVAR due to their unique technical characteristics described. There is a lack of comparative studies for newer endografts and postmarket clinical studies with long-term results concerning the most recently approved devices described, Alto and Conformable.

Persisting Type 2 Endoleaks Following EVAR for AAA Are Associated With AAA Expansion

Purpose: To determine the evolution of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) diameter in the presence of persisting type 2 endoleaks (pEL2) following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective, single-center, case-control study. All patients with pEL2 (pEL2 group, persisting for > 12 months) between 2004 and 2018 were identified and compared with a 1:1 age- and gender-matched control with no endoleak (control group). Primary outcome measures were freedom from AAA expansion and freedom from AAA shrinkage over time. AAA diameter measurements were performed on computed tomography angiography (CTA). Secondary outcome measures were survival, AAA-related mortality, reinterventions for pEL2, incidence of secondary type 1 endoleaks (EL1), and infrarenal aortic branch vessel anatomy. Results: A total of 773 patients were treated with EVAR for AAA between 2004 and 2018. Of them, 286 patients demonstrated type 2 endoleaks (EL2) in postoperative CTA or intraoperative angiography (37%). Forty-five of 286 EL2 (15.7%) were pEL2 (pEL2 group). Freedom from AAA expansion in the pEL2 group was 100%, 96.7%, 85.2%, and 54.3% after 1, 2, 3, and 4 years, respectively, compared with 100% after 1, 2, 3, and 4 years in the control group (p<0.01). Freedom from AAA shrinkage in the pEL2 group after 1, 2, 3, and 4 years was 95.5%, 90.4%, 90.4%, and 79.1%, respectively, compared with 86.7%, 34.8%, 19.3%, and 19.3% in the control group (p<0.01). Overall survival at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years was 100%, 97.6%, 95.0% and 95.0% in the pEL2 group and 100% at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years in the control group (p=0.17). There were no AAA-related deaths in either group. Patients with pEL2 had a significantly increased number of infrarenal aortic branches (p<0.05, respectively). Eighteen patients (40.0%) in the pEL2 group underwent 34 reinterventions for pEL2, with a median follow-up (FU) of 925 days (0–4173). Clinical success was achieved in 9 patients (50.0%). Four patients (8.9%) with pEL2 developed secondary EL1 after a median FU of 1278 days (662–2121). Conclusion: pEL2 are associated with AAA expansion during midterm FU. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the association of AAA expansion due to pEL2 with clinical outcomes to allow recommendations with regard to treatment indications.

Long-term results of treatment of infrarenal aortic aneurysms with low-profile stent grafts in a multicenter registry

ObjectiveIn recent years, manufacturers have developed new stent grafts with lower profiles to increase the endovascular aneurysm repair applicability. As reported by the current European Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines, long-term evaluation of such low-profile platforms is strongly recommended. This study aims to report outcomes beyond 5 years from a multicenter registry, including a real-world cohort of patients electively treated with low-profile stent grafts. MethodsA retrospective data collection of patients who had undergone elective implantation of low-profile endograft ≤16 Fr. (Zenith LP, Ovation, Incraft) was performed in nine centers. The primary endpoint was a long-term primary clinical success. Secondary endpoints were survival rate, freedom from abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA)-related death, freedom from type I to III endoleak, limb patency, and freedom from all reinterventions. The Kaplan-Meier curves were stratified for investigative devices. A multivariate analysis evaluated predictors of primary clinical success and reintervention rate. ResultsA total of 619 patients were enrolled (Ovation, n = 373; Incraft, n = 111; and Zenith LP, n = 135), with a mean follow-up of 56.8 ± 22.8 months. The overall primary and the secondary clinical success rate at 8 years was 72.1% and 93.8%, respectively. At 8 years, overall survival was 53.2%, freedom from AAA-related death was 94.4%, freedom from reintervention was 74%, freedom from type I/III endoleak was 86.9%, and limb patency was 90.4%. A significantly worse primary clinical success of the Zenith LP was recorded as dependent on more limb-related events. No differences between platforms were registered in the rate of AAA-related deaths, open conversion, sac enlargement, and type I/III endoleaks (P = .26). Multivariate analysis identified iliac tortuosity (hazard ratio, 2.053) and Zenith LP (hazard ratio, 3.818) as significant independent predictors of clinical failure and reintervention. ConclusionsLow-profile stent grafts have acceptable long-term outcomes. Overall survival and AAA-related death were in line with those reported for traditional devices. Long-term surveillance and reintervention, when necessary, remain crucial to guarantee durability.

Two Decades of Abdominal Aortic Endovascular Repair With the Anatomical FiXation at the Aortic Bifurcation in a Large Single-Center Experience

Objective: The introduction of new endograft models improved long-term results of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) endovascular repair (EVAR), but most of them maintained an old and unchanged design: a short body and long legs shifting up the flow divider. This study assessed the long-term results of EVAR with unimodular endoprosthesis fixed at the aorto-iliac bifurcation (Anatomical FiXation), in a large, unselected cohort. Materials and Methods: In a single-center, retrospective cohort study, 623 patients selectively treated between 1999 and 2016, were analyzed. Follow-up protocol included at least a computed tomography angiography within 3 months and a duplex ultrasound and clinical exam yearly. All enrolled patients were analyzed by 2020. The primary outcomes were technical success, clinical success, and survival. Secondary outcomes included survival-free from late-open-conversion (LOC), reintervention, and endoleaks. Results: Median age was 74±11 years and the follow-up 93±54 months. The technical success was achieved in 99.4% and the 30-day clinical success was 98.4%. A 5-year clinical success of 97.7% was registered and at 10 years success was 96.7%. The overall survival at 1, 5, 10, and 15 years was 92.4%, 79.5%, 64.9%, and 45.5%, respectively. Six (0.98%) AAA-related death were registered, 3 caused by infection of the endograft and 3 for secondary rupture. LOCs were 9 (1.47%) and reintervention-free survival at 1, 5, 10, and 15 years were 88.4%, 78.0%, 76.2%, and 74.6%, respectively. Freedom from endoleaks was 88.8% at 1 year and 72.7% at 15 years. A total of 63 high-flow endoleaks were registered (43 type I, 7 type IIIa, 12 type IIIb, and 1 type Ib+IIIb). No migrations were recorded, and the graft limb thrombosis rate was 1.14%. From a multivariate analysis resulted that long-term clinical success appeared to be reduced in patients affected by diabetes [odds ratio (OR) 0.24; p=0.04] and in presence of calcified and thrombotic iliac accesses (OR 0.16; p=0.006). Conclusion: EVAR with the Anatomical FiXation was confirmed to be safe, feasible, and effective to prevent AAA rupture in the long term as well. However, the overall survival remains afflicted by cardiovascular accident. The original concept of unibody bifurcated design allowed a very low rate of graft thrombosis and zeroed the risk of migration and related reintervention.

Sex-Based Disparities in Outcomes With Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

Although abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) are more common in men, women with AAA have increased morbidity and mortality. Additionally, there are discrepancies among professional society guidelines for AAA screening in women. In this retrospective study from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from 2003 to 2014, we compared rates of AAA repair (rupture and elective) and AAA-related mortality in men vs. women to identify predictors of death among men and women with AAA. We divided the population into 1) AAA rupture 2) elective AAA repair. The main outcomes included temporal trends in AAA rupture, rupture-related death, AAA repair, in-hospital death, and predictors of AAA-related death. There were 570,253 discharge records for AAA admissions between 2003 and 2014, including 22.8% women and 77.2% men. Women had a higher proportion of rupture (18.4% vs 12.6%, p <0.01). A smaller proportion of women underwent endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) compared with men in the ruptured AAA (13.9% vs. 20.3%, p <0.01) and elective repair (55.7% vs. 67.4%, p <0.01) cohorts. Within the ruptured cohort, a higher proportion of women did not receive repair (46.4% vs. 26.1%, p <0.01). On multivariable analysis, female gender was a significant predictor of death with rupture (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.66) and elective repair (OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.36 to 2.22), with both elective EVAR (OR 2.52, 95% CI 2.06 to 3.09) and elective open aortic repair (OAR; OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.33 to 1.68). Propensity score matching confirmed a higher risk of death in women in both the rupture (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.30) and elective repair (OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.35 to 1.67) cohorts. In conclusion, AAA poses significant morbidity and mortality, especially in women. Women were more likely to die before repair with AAA rupture and female gender was an independent predictor of mortality in both the rupture and elective repair groups.

Modelling the impact of changes to abdominal aortic aneurysm screening and treatment services in England during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The National Health Service (NHS) abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) screening programme (NAAASP) in England screens 65-year-old men. The programme monitors those with an aneurysm, and early intervention for large aneurysms reduces ruptures and AAA-related mortality. AAA screening services have been disrupted following COVID-19 but it is not known how this may impact AAA-related mortality, or where efforts should be focussed as services resume. We repurposed a previously validated discrete event simulation model to investigate the impact of COVID-19-related service disruption on key outcomes. This model was used to explore the impact of delayed invitation and reduced attendance in men invited to screening. Additionally, we investigated the impact of temporarily suspending scans, increasing the threshold for elective surgery to 7cm and increasing drop-out in the AAA cohort under surveillance, using data from NAAASP to inform the population. Delaying invitation to primary screening up to two years had little impact on key outcomes whereas a 10% reduction in attendance could lead to a 2% lifetime increase in AAA-related deaths. In surveillance patients, a 1-year suspension of surveillance or increase in the elective threshold resulted in a 0.4% increase in excess AAA-related deaths (8% in those 5-5.4cm at the start). Longer suspensions or a doubling of drop-out from surveillance would have a pronounced impact on outcomes. Efforts should be directed towards encouraging men to attend AAA screening service appointments post-COVID-19. Those with AAAs on surveillance should be prioritised as the screening programme resumes, as changes to these services beyond one year are likely to have a larger impact on surgical burden and AAA-related mortality.

Nineteen-year outcomes with the Anaconda stent graft system from two tertiary centers

ObjectiveThe Anaconda stent graft device presents peculiar and unique features in its design and deployment sequence, available on the market for many years with minor modifications, among different generations. The aim of this study was to assess the long-term, real-life, outcomes obtained in two high-volume centers with this endograft for infrarenal aortic aneurysms treatment over a period of 19 years. MethodsAll patients treated with the investigated device between 2000 and 2019, with at least 1 year of follow-up, were entered into a prospective database and data were reviewed retrospectively. The long-term results were assessed according to the Kaplan-Meier method. Primary outcomes were overall survival, freedom from AAA rupture, and freedom from AAA-related death. Secondary outcomes were freedom from late reintervention, freedom from late conversion to open repair, freedom from late limb occlusion, and freedom from late EVAR failure. ResultsA total of 260 consecutive patients were treated during the study period. Technical success was achieved in 98.5% (256/260) of the cases. Two perioperative deaths (0.8%) and four major complications (1.5%) were recorded. At a mean follow-up of 54 ± 38 months (summary follow-up index = 0.86), the late survival estimate was 94.8% at 1 year, 75.2% at 5 years, 50.5% at 10 years, and 43.3% at 13 years, with no case of late AAA rupture or late AAA-related death. Late freedom from conversion was 99.2% at 1 year, 96.9% at 5 years, 94.0% at 10 years, and 94.0% at 13 years. Freedom from late limb thrombosis was 96.8% at 1 year and 91.0% at 5, 10, and 13 years. Estimates of freedom from late reintervention was 95.6% at 1 year, 87.0% at 5 years, 77.4% at 10 years, and 77.4% at 13 years. Estimates of limb thrombosis at 11 years were significantly different in patients receiving or not intraoperative iliac kissing balloon maneuver with noncompliant angioplasty catheters (98.0% vs 88.4%; P = .029). ConclusionsThe Anaconda stent graft demonstrated effective and durable outcomes for AAA treatment over a 19-year period, with no case of late AAA rupture or AAA related death in the studied population. Late limb occlusion was the leading cause of reintervention; however, a positive prevention strategy was found in intraoperative kissing balloon, which was associated with significant reduced rate of iliac thrombosis over time.

Comparison of Outcomes Following EVAR Based on Aneurysm Diameter and Volume and Their Postoperative Variations

to evaluate the impact of bi- and 3-dimensional preoperative aortic morphological features and their immediate postoperative variations on the outcome of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) treated by endovascular exclusion with standard devices (EVAR). Double centre retrospective analysis of prospectively collected registry data of EVAR patients. For all patients, preoperative and 30-day computed tomographic angiography images (CTA) were reviewed. Preoperative maximum AAA diameter >59 mm and volume >159 cm3, and any 30-day postoperative increasing at CTA, were considered as potentially influencing the outcome. The outcome measures were: primary technical success; 30-day, 1-year, and mean follow-up reintervention, all-cause and AAA-related mortality rates, and also endoleak-related reinterventions. Three hundred and thrity-three patients were enrolled. Mean preoperative and 30-day AAA diameter and volume were 50.4 mm ± 11.8 vs. 49.1 mm ± 12.1, and 112.9 cm3 ± 79.5 vs. 112.1 cm3 ± 80.5, respectively. Primary technical success was achieved in all cases. At 34.9 months follow-up, cumulative reintervention rate was 12.0%, mortality rates 7.2%, without AAA-related deaths. Endoleak-related reintervention rate was 7.5%. At uni- and multi-variate analysis, preoperative AAA diameter >59 mm, and AAA volume >159 cm3 were significantly associated to reintervention (P = 0.012; P = 0.002), and reintervention and death (P = 0.002; P = 0.001) during follow-up. Additionally, any increase in postoperative AAA diameter or volume was significantly associated with reintervention (P = 0.001, P = 0.001) and reintervention and death (P = 0.006, P = 0.001). Endoleak-related reintervention were also significantly associated with all of the analysed morphological parameters (P = 0.019, P = 0.005, P = 0.005, and P = 0.002, respectively). Patients with larger baseline AAA size and volume as well as unfavourable early remodelling of the sac are associated to worse long-term EVAR outcome.