Α2δ Ligands Research Articles

Usefulness of Mirogabalin in Central Neuropathic Pain After Stroke: Post Hoc Analysis of a Phase3 Study by Stroke Type and Location.

Central post-stroke pain (CPSP) is a common type of central neuropathic pain (CNeP) that can occur following the onset of stroke. The oral gabapentinoid mirogabalin besylate (mirogabalin) is a selective α2δ ligand that is effective for the treatment of CNeP, including CPSP. However, it is unknown whether the analgesic effect of mirogabalin on CPSP varies in patients with different background factors. This was a post hoc subgroup analysis of a multinational, open-label, long-term phase3 study of mirogabalin for the treatment of CNeP conducted between March 2019 and December 2020. Data from patients with CPSP were stratified by type of stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic), stroke location (thalamus, putamen, brainstem, or other), presence/absence of motor weakness, median time since stroke (≥ 59 or < 59months), and median duration of CPSP (≥ 55.5 or < 55.5months). Efficacy was assessed with the short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were recorded. This subanalysis included all 94 patients with CPSP from the phase3 study; all were Japanese, and the mean age was 65.3years. The least squares mean change [95% confidence interval] in SF-MPQ visual analog scale (VAS) score from baseline at week52 (last observation carried forward) was - 17.0 [- 22.1, - 11.9] mm. Among the subgroups, least squares mean changes in SF-MPQ VAS scores were not different. Most TEAEs were mild or moderate; severe TEAEs occurred in six patients (6.4%). Somnolence (25.5%), peripheral edema (13.8%), dizziness (11.7%), and weight gain (6.4%) were the most common ADRs, and the types and frequencies of ADRs were similar among subgroups. Mirogabalin was generally effective and well tolerated in patients with CPSP, regardless of background factors such as stroke type or location, presence/absence of motor weakness, time since stroke, and duration of CPSP. Trial registration number NCT03901352.

Modeling an evaluation of the efficacy of the novel neuroanalgesic drug mirogabalin for diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain and postherpetic neuralgia therapy

Diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (DPNP) and postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) are challenging and often intractable complex medical conditions, with a substantial impact on the quality of life. Mirogabalin, a novel voltage-gated Ca2+ channel α2δ ligand, was approved for the indication of DPNP and PHN. However, the time course of effects has not yet been clarified.We aimed to establish pharmacodynamic and placebo effect models of mirogabalin and pregabalin in DPNP and PHN, and to quantitatively compare the efficacy characteristics (maximum efficacy, onset time, and other pharmacodynamic parameters) and safety of mirogabalin and pregabalin. Public databases were comprehensively searched for randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials. A model-based meta-analysis (MBMA) was developed to describe the time course of drug efficacy and placebo effects. Adverse events were compared using a fixed-effects meta-analysis. Sixteen studies including 5,147 participants were eligible for this study. The placebo effect was relatively high and gradually increased with time, and it required at least eight weeks to reach a plateau. The pharmacodynamic model revealed that the maximum pure efficacy for mirogabalin and pregabalin was approximately -7.85 % and -8.86 %, respectively; the efficacy of mirogabalin to relieve DPNP and PHN was not superior to that of pregabalin, and both drugs had similar safety. While the rate constant of the onset rate of pregabalin was approximately thrice as high as that of mirogabalin. In addition, the baseline level of pain was an important factor affecting pregabalin efficacy. These findings are helpful in evaluating the clinical extension value of mirogabalin. They suggest that the high placebo effect and the baseline level of pain should be considered when grouping patients in future research and development of voltage-gated Ca2+ channel neuroanalgesic.

Huzursuz Bacaklar Sendromu: Tanıdan Tedaviye

Restless legs syndrome (RLS) can be described by an urge to move limbs that typically coincides with an uncomfortable sensation. When at rest or inactivity, signs may start or develop worse; they usually go away when one moves or gets up for a walk. RLS can be both idiopathic or secondary to many kinds of health conditions, such as deficiency of iron, diabetes, obesity, hypothyroidism, and chronic renal failure. At the admission, secondary causes and iron tests, such as transferrin saturation and ferritin, must be evaluated. Assessments should be repeated when symptoms worsen, or when augmentation develops. Augmentation is a significant adverse effect of therapy by levodopa and dopamine agonists. More severe signs, early appearance of symptoms, and spreading of symptoms from the legs to other body parts are indicative of augmentation. Non-pharmacological treatments help some RLS patients control their symptoms. Iron-replacement therapy is a first-line treatment option for patients with indications of low body iron stores. The use of α2δ ligands as initial treatments instead of dopamine agonists has been recommended recently.

Considerations When Using Gabapentinoids to Treat Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Review.

Despite the exemplary efficacy of voltage-gated sodium channel blockers as a first-line treatment of trigeminal neuralgia, the pharmacological management of this excruciating facial pain condition remains a major issue, as these first-line drugs produce intolerable side effects in a significant portion of patients. In addition, in patients with concomitant continuous pain, the efficacy of these drugs may drop, thus suggesting the opportunity to test the efficacy of different drug categories. The aim of this review is to provide current, evidence-based, knowledge about the use of gabapentin and other α2δ ligands in patients with trigeminal neuralgia. We searched for relevant papers within PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and the Clinical Trials database (ClinicalTrials.gov), considering publications up to April 2023. Two authors independently selected studies for inclusion and data extraction. The efficacy of α2δ ligands, gabapentin and pregabalin, has been assessed in seven controlled or open-label studies. Despite the low quality of evidence, the favorable tolerability profile and the possible action on concomitant continuous pain make this drug category of interest for future trials in trigeminal neuralgia.

Neuropathic Pain

Many diseases are associated with "neuropathic pain", which is not usually manageable with common analgesics, such as NSAIDs and acetaminophen. Calcium ion channel α2δ ligands, serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors, and tricyclic antidepressants have been used as first-line drugs. If there are no improvements after using these drugs for a while, vaccinia virus inoculation of rabbit inflammatory skin extract, tramadol, and eventually opioid analgesics, may be considered.

Perioperative Analgesics and Anesthesia as Risk Factors for Postoperative Chronic Opioid Use in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using Japanese Hospital Claims Data.

Patients with chronic postsurgical pain are commonly prescribed opioids chronically because of refractory pain although chronic opioid use can cause various severe problems. We aimed to investigate postoperative chronic opioid use and its association with perioperative pain management in patients who underwent a total knee arthroplasty in a Japanese real-world clinical setting. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using an administrative claims database. We used a multivariate logistic regression analysis to examine the association between perioperative analgesic and anesthesia prescriptions and postoperative chronic opioid use. We calculated all-cause medication and medical costs for each patient. Of the 23,537,431 patient records, 14,325 patients met the criteria and were included in the analyses. There were 5.4% of patients with postoperative chronic opioid use. Perioperative prescriptions of weak opioids, strong and weak opioids, and the α2δ ligand were significantly associated with postoperative chronic opioid use (adjusted odds ratio [95% confidence interval], 7.22 [3.89, 13.41], 7.97 [5.07, 12.50], and 1.45 [1.13, 1.88], respectively). Perioperative combined prescriptions of general and local anesthesia were also significantly associated with postoperative chronic opioid use (3.37 [2.23, 5.08]). These medications and local anesthesia were more commonly prescribed on the day following surgery, after routinely used medications and general anesthesia were prescribed. The median total direct costs were approximately 1.3-fold higher among patients with postoperative chronic opioid use than those without postoperative chronic opioid use. Patients who require supplementary prescription of analgesics for acute postsurgical pain are at high risk of postoperative chronic opioid use and these prescriptions should be given careful consideration to mitigate the patient burden.

Medical Treatment of Chronic Pain

Antinociceptive therapy for chronic neuropathic pain is anecdotal in nature based on a physician's preference. However, evidence-based therapy is expected, following the chronic pain guideline established in 2021, supported by 10 pain-associated Japanese medical societies. The guideline strongly recommends the use of Ca2+-channel α2δ ligands (pregabalin, gabapentin, and mirogabalin) and duloxetine for pain relief. International guidelines also recommend administration of tricyclic antidepressants as first-line agents. Recent studies have described three classes of medicines that show comparable antinociceptive effects in painful diabetic neuropathy. Furthermore, a combination of first-line agents can improve efficacy. Antinociceptive medical therapy should be individualized based on the patient's condition and adverse effect profile of each medication.

Study on structure-activity relationship (SAR) of simplified mirogabalin derivatives as voltage-gated calcium channel α2δ ligands for the treatment of chronic neuropathic pain

Study on structure-activity relationship (SAR) of simplified mirogabalin derivatives as voltage-gated calcium channel α2δ ligands for the treatment of chronic neuropathic pain

Mirogabalin improves cancer-associated pain but increases the risk of malignancy in mice with pancreatic cancer.

Mirogabalin, a selective voltage-gated calcium channel α2δ ligand, improves peripheral neuropathic pain; however, its effects on patients with cancers including pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remain unknown. We analyzed the effects of mirogabalin on a KPPC ( LSL-KrasG12D/+; Trp53flox/flox; Pdx-1cre/+ ) mouse model of PDAC. Six-week-old KPPC mice received oral mirogabalin (10 mg/kg/day) (n = 10) or vehicle water (n = 14) until the humane end point. Cancer-associated pain was evaluated using the scores of hunching and mouse grimace scale (MGS). Tumor status and plasma cytokine levels were determined using histopathological analysis and cytokine array, respectively. The effects of mirogabalin on the proliferative ability of PDAC cell lines were determined. The scores of the hunching and MGS improved after mirogabalin administration with a decrease in the plasma levels of inflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin-6, and interferon-γ. Although no significant difference in the survival rate was observed, mirogabalin significantly increased pancreatic tumor size and proliferative index of Ki-67 and cyclins. Local arginase-1 + M2-like tumor-associated macrophages and CD31 + tumor blood vessels increased after mirogabalin administration. By contrast, the number of α-smooth muscle actin + cancer-associated fibroblasts, desmoplastic stroma, and CD8 + T cells decreased. Local myeloperoxidase + tumor-associated neutrophils and CD45R + B cells were unaltered. Mirogabalin enhanced the proliferative ability of PDAC cell lines with the upregulation of cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinases; however, it inhibited the potential of pancreatic stellate cells in vitro. Therefore, our results suggest that mirogabalin improves cancer-associated pain but enhances the proliferative potential of PDAC in vitro and in vivo.

Can calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibody improve migraine and restless legs syndrome?

BackgroundA significant association between migraine and restless legs syndrome (RLS) has been reported, and their coexistence is not uncommon. We report a patient with concomitant migraine and RLS who showed improvement of both migraine and RLS symptoms after treatment with galcanezumab, a calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibody. Case presentationA 47-year-old woman had been treated in our outpatient headache clinic for migraine without aura. She had RLS since childhood and had been treated with dopamine agonists and α2δ ligands. Over the past 2 months, the patient suffered from frequent migraine headaches and worsening RLS symptoms, despite ongoing treatment. Therefore, galcanezumab was started. After 1 month, the number of headache days decreased from 20 to 4, and her score on the International RLS Study Group Rating Scale improved from 38 to 10. Her photo/phono/osmo-phobia were also markedly improved. The efficacy of galcanezumab for both headache and RLS was sustained over 5 months. ConclusionWe report a case of improvement of both migraine and RLS after treatment with CGRP monoclonal antibody. Additional studies are needed to clarify how CGRP antagonism affects RLS symptoms in patients with migraine and RLS comorbidity.

Mirogabalin, a novel α2δ ligand, is not a substrate of LAT1, but of PEPT1, PEPT2, OAT1, OAT3, OCT2, MATE1 and MATE2-K

Mirogabalin is a α2δ ligand as well as pregabalin. The aim of this study was to clarify whether mirogabalin is a substrate of human LAT1, which involved in absorption and disposition of pregabalin, and to investigate transporters involved in renal secretion and absorption of mirogabalin using transporter-expressing cells and fresh human kidney slices. We employed uptake assay of [3H]mirogabalin by HEK293T or HEK293 cells transiently overexpress human OAT1, OAT3, OCT2, LAT1/4F2hc, LAT2/4F2hc, PEPT1, and PEPT2 proteins. Transport assay of MDCKII cells transiently overexpress OCT2/MATE1, and OCT2/MATE2-K proteins was conducted. Contribution of transporters to renal secretion was investigated by uptake assay using human kidney slices. Uptake clearances of [3H]mirogabalin by OAT1-, OAT3-, OCT2-, PEPT1-, and PEPT2-expressing cells were higher than that by vector cells, but by LAT1/4F2hc and LAT2/4F2hc-expressing cells were not. In transport assay using OCT2/MATE1 and OCT2/MATE2-K cells, [3H]mirogabalin showed directional transport from basolateral to apical side. Contribution of OAT1, OAT3, and OCT2 was observed by uptake of [3H]mirogabalin into the kidney slices. These results indicate that mirogabalin is not a substrate of LAT1, but of PEPT1 and PEPT2 involved in absorption and of OAT1, OAT3, OCT2, MATE1 and/or MATE2-K involved in its urinary secretion.

Review of Voltage-gated Calcium Channel α2δ Subunit Ligands for the Treatment of Chronic Neuropathic Pain and Insight into Structure-activity Relationship (SAR) by Pharmacophore Modeling.

Neuropathic pain (NP) is a complex symptom related to nerve damage. The discovery of new drugs for treating chronic NP has been continuing for several decades, while more progress is still needed because of the unsatisfactory efficacy and the side effects of the currently available drugs. Among all the approved drugs for chronic NP, voltage- gated calcium channel (VGCC) α2δ subunit ligands, also known as gabapentinoids, are among the first-line treatment and represent a class of efficacious and relatively safe therapeutic agents. However, new strategies are still needed to be explored due to the unsatisfied response rate. The aim of the study is to review the latest status of the discovery and development of gabapentinoids for the treatment of chronic NP by covering both the marketed and the preclinical/clinical ones. Moreover, it aims to analyze the structure-activity relationship (SAR) of gabapentinoids to facilitate the future design of structurally novel therapeutic agents targeting the VGCC α2δ subunit. We searched PubMed Central, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, and Espacenet for the literature and patents on diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain, postherpetic neuralgia, fibromyalgia, voltage-gated calcium channel α2δ subunit and related therapeutic agents from incipient to June 10, 2021. The SAR of gabapentinoids was analyzed by pharmacophore modeling using the Phase module in the Schrödinger suite. A variety of gabapentinoids were identified as VGCC α2δ ligands that have ever been under development to treat chronic NP. Among them, four gabapentinoids are marketed, one is in the active late clinical trials, and eight have been discontinued. Pharmacophore models were generated using the phase module in the Schrödinger suite, and common pharmacophores were predicted based on pharmacophoric features and analyzed. The latest progress in the discovery and development of gabapentinoids for the treatment of chronic NP was reviewed. Moreover, the structure-activity relationship (SAR) of gabapentinoids has been analyzed by pharmacophore modeling, which will be valuable for the future design of structurally novel therapeutic agents targeting the VGCC α2δ subunit.

Efficacy and Safety of Add-on Mirogabalin to NSAIDs in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Peripheral Neuropathic Pain: A Randomized, Open-Label Study.

IntroductionIn Japan, conservative therapy for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) includes non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), prostaglandin E1, tramadol, physical/exercise therapy, and nerve blocks. Mirogabalin, a selective oral α2δ ligand, is approved for treating peripheral neuropathic pain, though data regarding visual analog scores (VAS) for pain in patients with LSS are limited. We investigated the efficacy and safety of mirogabalin as an add-on treatment in patients with LSS taking NSAIDs compared with patients taking NSAIDs only.MethodsThis multicenter, randomized, open-label study (MiroTAS) was conducted at 32 centers in Japan between June 2020 and October 2021. Patients were randomly assigned to mirogabalin and NSAIDs or NSAIDs alone in a 1:1 ratio. NSAIDs were administered according to their Japanese package inserts; mirogabalin was administered based on renal function [creatinine clearance (CrCL) ≥ 60 mL/min, 5 mg twice daily (BID) in Weeks 1–2, 10 mg BID in Weeks 3–4, and 15 or 10 mg BID after Week 5; CrCL 30 to < 60 mL/min, 2.5 mg BID Weeks 1–2, 5 mg BID Weeks 3–4, and 7.5 or 5 mg BID after Week 5]. The primary endpoint was the change in VAS score for leg pain from baseline to Week 12. Secondary endpoints were quality of life, evaluated using the EuroQol five-dimensional descriptive system (EQ-5D-5L) (at baseline and Week 12) and Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) (at Week 12), and safety. Change in VAS score at Week 12 was calculated using a linear mixed model for repeated measures. The safety endpoints were treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and adverse drug reactions.ResultsIn total, 220 patients who met the eligibility criteria were enrolled. In the mirogabalin and NSAIDs and NSAIDs groups, mean ages (67.8 vs. 70.9 years), proportions of female patients (54.5% vs. 49.0%), mean body weights (63.9 vs. 62.0 kg), mean CrCL values (81.5 vs. 70.7 mL/min), proportions of patients with CrCL 30 to < 60 mL/min (27.3% vs. 33.7%), mean VAS scores (63.8 vs. 62.8 mm), and proportions of patients with VAS score ≥ 60 (53.6% vs. 52.9%) at enrollment were similar. The median durations of LSS were 9.0 and 11.0 months and the spine pain DETECT questionnaire (SPDQ) scores were 6.8 and 7.8, respectively. The least square (LS) mean change in VAS score from baseline to Week 12 was − 24.1 mm in the mirogabalin and NSAIDs group and − 14.2 mm in the NSAIDs group (both P < 0.0001 vs. baseline). The difference in LS mean was − 9.9 [95% confidence interval (CI), − 18.0, − 1.8] (P = 0.0174). The improvement in EQ-5D-5L score at Week 12 was significantly greater in the mirogabalin and NSAIDs group versus the NSAIDs group [mean difference, 0.0529 (95% CI, 0.0036, 0.1022), P = 0.0357]. At Week 12, the proportions of patients with PGIC scores ≤ 3 and ≤ 2 were higher in the mirogabalin and NSAIDs group vs. the NSAIDs group (76.2% vs. 50.0%, P = 0.0006, and 47.6% vs. 32.4%, P = 0.0523). In the mirogabalin and NSAIDs group, the incidences of TEAEs and adverse drug reactions were 60.9% and 57.3%, respectively, and the most common TEAEs were somnolence (30.0%) and dizziness (25.5%).ConclusionsThe addition of mirogabalin to NSAIDs improved VAS, EQ-5D-5L, and PGIC. The main TEAEs were somnolence and dizziness. The addition of mirogabalin to NSAIDs improved peripheral neuropathic pain associated with LSS and raised no new safety concerns.Trial RegistrationJapan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTs021200007).Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40122-022-00410-z.

Chronic musculoskeletal pain. Leading symptom or comorbid pathology?

Current trends in the development of personalized medicine dictate the need to interpret chronic pain as a multifactorial biopsychosocial phenomenon. A comprehensive integrated approach to the management of patients with chronic pain includes nosological diagnostics, assessment of factors that determine the persistence of pain and comorbid pathology, and the use of necessary pharmacological and non-pharmacological methods of treatment. Currently, primarily non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are used for the pharmacotherapy of chronic pain, which is predominantly nociceptive in nature. Meloxicam (Movalis®), along with high efficacy, has a favorable safety profile and has proven itself in the treatment of chronic musculoskeletal pain. For chronic pain associated predominantly with neuropathy and central sensitization, the drugs of choice are tricyclic antidepressants, serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor duloxetine, the α2δ ligands pregabalin and gabapentin.

The Treatment of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy.

Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (painful-DPN) is a highly prevalent and disabling condition, affecting up to one-third of patients with diabetes. This condition can have a profound impact resulting in a poor quality of life, disruption of employment, impaired sleep, and poor mental health with an excess of depression and anxiety. The management of painful-DPN poses a great challenge. Unfortunately, currently there are no Food and Drug Administration (USA) approved disease-modifying treatments for diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) as trials of putative pathogenetic treatments have failed at phase 3 clinical trial stage. Therefore, the focus of managing painful- DPN other than improving glycaemic control and cardiovascular risk factor modification is treating symptoms. The recommended treatments based on expert international consensus for painful- DPN have remained essentially unchanged for the last decade. Both the serotonin re-uptake inhibitor (SNRI) duloxetine and α2δ ligand pregabalin have the most robust evidence for treating painful-DPN. The weak opioids (e.g. tapentadol and tramadol, both of which have an SNRI effect), tricyclic antidepressants such as amitriptyline and α2δ ligand gabapentin are also widely recommended and prescribed agents. Opioids (except tramadol and tapentadol), should be prescribed with caution in view of the lack of definitive data surrounding efficacy, concerns surrounding addiction and adverse events. Recently, emerging therapies have gained local licenses, including the α2δ ligand mirogabalin (Japan) and the high dose 8% capsaicin patch (FDA and Europe). The management of refractory painful-DPN is difficult; specialist pain services may offer off-label therapies (e.g. botulinum toxin, intravenous lidocaine and spinal cord stimulation), although there is limited clinical trial evidence supporting their use. Additionally, despite combination therapy being commonly used clinically, there is little evidence supporting this practise. There is a need for further clinical trials to assess novel therapeutic agents, optimal combination therapy and existing agents to determine which are the most effective for the treatment of painful-DPN. This article reviews the evidence for the treatment of painful-DPN, including emerging treatment strategies such as novel compounds and stratification of patients according to individual characteristics (e.g. pain phenotype, neuroimaging and genotype) to improve treatment responses.

A large-scale database study for the prescription status of a new voltage-gated Ca2+ channel α2δ ligand, mirogabalin, in Japan

ABSTRACT Background A new voltage-gated Ca2+ channel α2δ ligand, mirogabalin, was first approved for treating peripheral neuropathic pain in Japan in 2019. This is the first report on the prescription status of mirogabalin using a large-scale prescription database. Research Design and Methods The authors analyzed the prescription data of 12,924 patients prescribed mirogabalin between 1 June and 31 August 2020. The endpoints were the number of patients prescribed, prescription days, prescription doses, dose changes, co-prescription patterns, medication possession ratio (MPR), and treatment discontinuation rates (TDRs). Results Mirogabalin was newly prescribed to 7,914 patients in the 3-month study period. Most patients were prescribed mirogabalin at about 10 mg/day during the study period, and 30.9% of patients were prescribed ≥ 20 mg/day on Day 90 after the first prescription. The most frequently prescribed concomitant drug was celecoxib. The MPR (80 to 110%) was 86.2%, indicating good treatment adherence. The cumulative TDRs during ≤ 7 Days, Days 31–60, and 61–90 were 14.0%, 70.0%, and 77.9%, respectively. Conclusions Mirogabalin was prescribed to a considerable number of patients. These results may be useful for optimizing mirogabalin use for patients with peripheral neuropathic pain in daily clinical practice. Clinical trial registration number UMIN000042592

Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of mirogabalin, a novel α2δ ligand, in rats and monkeys

The purpose of this study was to investigate the pharmacokinetic behaviour of mirogabalin in rats and monkeys. Pharmacokinetic parameters of mirogabalin after its oral and intravenous administration were determined. Distribution study, mass balance study and metabolite identification were also conducted after the oral administration of [14C]mirogabalin. Plasma exposure (Cmax and AUCinf) increased dose-proportionally after the oral administration of mirogabalin at 1, 3 and 10 mg/kg to rats and monkeys. Mean total body clearance (CLtot) after intravenous administration at 3 mg/kg was 13.5 mL/min/kg in rats and 9.02 mL/min/kg in monkeys, and absolute bioavailability at 3 mg/kg was 97.6% in rats and 85.2% in monkeys. There was greater recovery of radioactivity in urine than that in faeces after the oral administration of [14C]mirogabalin. The main radioactive component in the plasma, urine and faeces was mirogabalin. A204-4455 (lactam form), an oxidised metabolite of mirogabalin, mirogabalin N-glucuronide and O-glucuronide of oxidised A204-4455 were detected as minor components in monkeys and rats. Mirogabalin administered orally was almost completely eliminated via urinary excretion. A small part of the orally administered dose of mirogabalin was metabolised via glucuronidation at the amine and carboxylic acid moiety and oxidation as the primary metabolic pathway.

Differential Effects of Treatment Strategies in Individuals With Chronic Ocular Surface Pain With a Neuropathic Component.

Background: Dysfunction at the ocular system via nociceptive or neuropathic mechanisms can lead to chronic ocular pain. While many studies have reported on responses to treatment for nociceptive pain, fewer have focused on neuropathic ocular pain. This retrospective study assessed clinical responses to pain treatment modalities in individuals with neuropathic component ocular surface pain. Methods: 101 individuals seen at the University of Miami Oculofacial Pain Clinic from January 2015 to August 2021 with ≥3 months of clinically diagnosed neuropathic pain were included. Patients were subcategorized (postsurgical, post-traumatic, migraine-like, and laterality) and self-reported treatment outcomes were assessed (no change, mild, moderate, or marked improvement). One-way ANOVA (analysis of variance) was used to examine relationships between follow up time and number of treatments attempted with pain improvement, and multivariable logistic regression was used to assess which modalities led to pain improvement. Results: The mean age was 55 years, and most patients were female (64.4%) and non-Hispanic (68.3%). Migraine-like pain (40.6%) was most common, followed by postsurgical (26.7%), post-traumatic (16.8%) and unilateral pain (15.8%). The most common oral therapies were α2δ ligands (48.5%), the m common topical therapies were autologous serum tears (20.8%) and topical corticosteroids (19.8%), and the most common adjuvant was periocular nerve block (24.8%). Oral therapies reduced pain in post-traumatic (81.2%), migraine-like (73%), and unilateral (72.7%) patients, but only in a minority of postsurgical (38.5%) patients. Similarly, topicals improved pain in post-traumatic (66.7%), migraine-like (78.6%), and unilateral (70%) compared to postsurgical (43.7%) patients. Non-oral/topical adjuvants reduced pain in postsurgical (54.5%), post-traumatic (71.4%), and migraine-like patients (73.3%) only. Multivariable analyses indicated migraine-like pain improved with concomitant oral α2δ ligands and adjuvant therapies, while postsurgical pain improved with topical anti-inflammatories. Those with no improvement in pain had a shorter mean follow-up (266.25 ± 262.56 days) than those with mild (396.65 ± 283.44), moderate (652 ± 413.92), or marked improvement (837.93 ± 709.35) (p < 0.005). Identical patterns were noted for number of attempted medications. Conclusion: Patients with migraine-like pain frequently experienced pain improvement, while postsurgical patients had the lowest response rates. Patients with a longer follow-up and who tried more therapies experienced more significant relief, suggesting multiple trials were necessary for pain reduction.

Updates in diabetic neuropathy: A call for new diagnostic and treatment approaches.

Diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN) is a serious complication of both type 1 and type 2 diabetes. The major clinical manifestations of DPN are neuropathic pain, diabetic foot (which is associated with ulcers, gangrene, and amputation), and autonomic neuropathy. Diabetic sensorimotor peripheral neuropathy (DSPN) is the most common form of DPN and affects approximately 50% of people with type 1 or 2 diabetes during their lifetime (1) . Despite its major clinical impact, DPN remains underdiagnosed and undertreated. To reduce the burdens of DPN, there is an urgent need to develop both novel diagnostic procedures that enable to improve the early detection of the disease and new treatments that address multiple mechanistic pathways (Figure) (2) .

Restless legs syndrome.

Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a common sensorimotor disorder characterized by an urge to move that appears during rest or is exacerbated by rest, that occurs in the evening or night and that disappears during movement or is improved by movement. Symptoms vary considerably in age at onset, frequency and severity, with severe forms affecting sleep, quality of life and mood. Patients with RLS often display periodic leg movements during sleep or resting wakefulness. RLS is considered to be a complex condition in which predisposing genetic factors, environmental factors and comorbidities contribute to the expression of the disorder. RLS occurs alone or with comorbidities, for example, iron deficiency and kidney disease, but also with cardiovascular diseases, diabetes mellitus and neurological, rheumatological and respiratory disorders. The pathophysiology is still unclear, with the involvement of brain iron deficiency, dysfunction in the dopaminergic and nociceptive systems and altered adenosine and glutamatergic pathways as hypotheses being investigated. RLS is poorly recognized by physicians and it is accordingly often incorrectly diagnosed and managed. Treatment guidelines recommend initiation of therapy with low doses of dopamine agonists or α2δ ligands in severe forms. Although dopaminergic treatment is initially highly effective, its long-term use can result in a serious worsening of symptoms known as augmentation. Other treatments include opioids and iron preparations.