Days Of Prescription Research Articles

Real-world efficacy of fimasartan vs. other angiotensin receptor blockers in combination with calcium channel blockers: a nationwide cohort study.

The antihypertensive efficacy of fimasartan was assessed based on the transition rate from a combination of calcium channel blockers (CCB) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) to three-drug combination therapy, as compared to other ARBs. This nationwide cohort study used data obtained from the Korean National Health Insurance Service database. Patients who had received national health checkups within 2 years prior to January 1, 2017, and were concurrently prescribed ARBs and CCBs for > 30 days during the 6 months from January 1, 2017, to June 30, 2017 were included in the study. Patients were categorized into the 'fimasartan group' (those prescribed fimasartan) and the 'non-fimasartan group' (those prescribed ARBs other than fimasartan). The index date was set as the last day of a 30-day prescription period for ARBs and CCBs, with a subsequent 2.5-year follow-up to observe the potential addition of a third drug, such as beta-blockers or diuretics. The study included 34,422 patients with a mean age of 60.3 years and 58.3% being male. The fimasartan group constituted 2.7% (n = 928) of the total, and the non-fimasartan group, 97.3% (n = 33,494). During the follow-up period, 38 patients in the fimasartan group (14.3 per 1,000 person-years) and 3,557 patients in the non-fimasartan group (42.8 per 1,000 person-years) required additional antihypertensive medications. After multivariate adjustment for age, sex, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, cancer, heart failure, systolic blood pressure, and diastolic blood pressure, the fimasartan group showed a significantly lower rate of adding a third medication (hazard ratio 2.68, 95% confidence interval 1.95-3.69) compared to that of the non-fimasartan group. Fimasartan is associated with a lower need for additional antihypertensive drugs compared to other ARBs. This implies its greater effectiveness in hypertension management, potentially enhancing cardiovascular outcomes, and minimizing polypharmacy.

Discrepancy in opioid prescription patterns for Black or African American patients following lower extremity bypass surgery for chronic limb-threatening ischemia

BackgroundDisparity in the allocation of medical services and resources based on race is present within the health care industry today, including the prescription of postoperative analgesics. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the presence of race-based disparity in the prescription of postdischarge opioids after lower extremity bypass (LEB) surgery for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). MethodsRetrospective analysis was conducted on adult CLTI patients who underwent LEB from 2000 to 2023 in the TrinetX database. Patients were stratified into two groups based on race: White (group I) and black or African American (AA) (group II). Primary outcomes were defined as oral opioid prescriptions at 7 days and 30 days after discharge, and mortality at 1 year postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included length of stay and 30-day postoperative outcomes, including myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, cerebral vascular accident, deep vein thrombosis, acute kidney injury, major amputation, minor amputation, major adverse cardiac events, and major adverse limb events. Stratified analysis was conducted based on disease stage (rest pain vs lower extremity ulcer vs gangrene). Univariate analysis was performed via two-sample t test and χ2 test. Logistic regression was performed to estimate the association of Black or AA (vs White) race while controlling for pertinent preoperative potential confounders. ResultsThere were 3345 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Group I included 2661 White patients and group II included 684 Black or AA patients. Group II patients were more likely to be younger, female, present with gangrene, and have a history of hypertension, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, or diabetic neuropathy. At both 7 and 30 days after discharge, the Black or AA cohort had significantly lower rates of opioid prescriptions (33.2% vs 42.5% and 35.8% vs 47.2%, respectively) (all P < .05). Stratification by indication showed that opioid prescription disparity persisted despite black or AA patients presenting at worse stages of disease both at 7 and 30 days after discharge (7 days: rest pain 43.4% vs 33.7% [P = .013], ulcer 41.4% vs 31.7% [P = .027], gangrene, 42.7% vs 33.6% [P = .006] and 30 days: rest pain 47.8% vs 37.1% [P = .007], ulcer 45.4% vs 33.5% [P = .007], gangrene, 48.2% vs 36.1% [P < .001]). Adjusted analysis confirmed that Black or AA race was associated with lower rates of 7- (adjusted odds ratio, 0.607; P = .001) and 30-day (adjusted odds ratio, 0.56; P = .001) postdischarge opioid prescriptions. ConclusionsBlack or AA patients were less likely to receive postdischarge opioid prescriptions compared with their White counterparts at 7 and 30 days after LEB for CLTI.

Differences across race and ethnicity in the quality of antidepressant medication management.

To illustrate the importance of a multidimensional view of disparities in quality of antidepressant medication management (AMM), as well as discriminating "within-facility" disparities from disparities that exist between facilities. We used data from the Veterans Health Administration's (VA) Corporate Data Warehouse (CDW) which contains clinical and administrative data from VA facilities nationally. CDW data were used to measure five indicators of AMM quality, including the HEDIS Effective Acute-Phase and Effective Continuation-Phase measures. Mixed effects regression models were used to examine differences in quality indicators between racial/ethnic groups, controlling for other demographic and clinical factors. An adaptation of the Kitagawa-Blinder-Oaxaca (KBO) method was used to decompose mean differences in treatment quality between racial and ethnic groups into within- and between-facility effects. Demographic, clinical, and health service utilization data were extracted for patients in fiscal year 2017 with a diagnosis of depression and a new start of an antidepressant medication. The decomposition of the overall differences between White and Black patients on receiving an initial 90-day prescription (46.7% vs. 32.7%), Effective Acute-Phase (79.7% vs. 66.8%), and Effective Continuation-Phase (64.0% vs. 49.6%) HEDIS measures revealed that most of the overall effects were "within-facility," meaning that Black patients are less likely to meet these measures regardless of where they are treated. Although the overall magnitude of disparities between White and Hispanic patients on these three measures was very similar (46.7% vs. 32.7%; 79.7% vs. 69.2%; 64.0% vs. 53.6%), the differences were more attributable to Hispanic patients being treated in facilities with overall lower performance on these measures. Discriminating within- and between-facility disparities and taking a multidimensional view of quality are essential to informing efforts to address disparities in AMM quality.

Association of Disability Status and Type With Binge Drinking and Prescription Opioid Misuse Among Adults From a 3-State Sample.

Research examining at-risk substance use by disability status is limited, with little investigation into differences by disability type. We investigated binge drinking and prescription opioid misuse among adults with and without disabilities, and by type of disability, to inform need for assessment and intervention within these populations. Secondary analyses of adults who completed the disability, alcohol, and prescription opioid misuse items in the 2018 Ohio, Florida, or Nebraska Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System surveys (n = 28 341), the only states that included prescription opioid misuse in 2018. Self-reported disability status (yes/no) relied on 6 standardized questions assessing difficulties with: vision, hearing, mobility, cognition, self-care, and independent living (dichotomous, nonmutually exclusive, for each disability). Logistic regression models estimated the association of disability status and type with (1) past 30-day binge drinking and (2) past-year prescription opioid misuse. Additional models were restricted to separate subsamples of adults who: (a) currently drink, (b) received a past-year prescription opioid, and (c) did not receive a past-year prescription opioid. One-third reported at least one disability, with mobility (19.5%), cognitive (11.5%), and hearing (10.2%) disability being the most common. Disability status was associated with lower odds of binge drinking (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.68-0.80, P ≤ .01). However, among adults who currently drink, people with disabilities had higher odds of binge drinking (AOR = 1.11, 95% CI 1.01-1.22, P ≤ .05]. Disability was associated with higher odds of past-year prescription opioid misuse (AOR = 2.51, 95% CI 2.17-2.91, P ≤ .01). Adults with disabilities had higher odds of prescription opioid misuse, and among adults who currently drink, higher odds for binge drinking were observed. The magnitude of the association between disability status and prescription opioid misuse was particularly concerning. Providers should be trained to screen and treat for substance use problems for people with disabilities.

(164) Potential Savings with Use of Cost Plus Pharmacy for Medical Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction

Abstract Introduction With its stated goal “to end ridiculous drug prices,” the Mark Cuban Cost Plus Drug Company (MCCPDC) launched in January 2022 with over 100 generic prescription drugs available to be mailed directly to patients without the involvement of health insurance. To promote drug cost transparency, all drugs are priced at the cost to manufacture the drug with a 15% administrative markup, a $3 pharmacist fee, and a $5 shipping fee. Prior research has focused on the theoretical savings MCCPDC could offer if Medicare purchased drugs at MCCPDC prices with studies reporting a potential $3.3 billion in savings for Medicare. Prescription drug spending is continuing to rise in the United States and providers are increasingly considering patient’s out-of-pocket costs. MCCPDC touts a transparent, consistent pricing model, but it is unclear if this pricing model will actually translate to cost savings for patients. Objective We sought to analyze if Mark Cuban Cost Plus Drug Company (MCCPDC) can offer savings directly to patients compared with other mail-order pharmacies, local pharmacies (based on zip code of our urology clinic) and with patients using health insurance to fill prescriptions for their sildenafil, vardenafil and tadalafil. Methods Out of the approximately 100 generic drugs available on MCCPDC website, we analyzed the 3 drugs that are prescribed to treat erectile dysfunction. We analyzed drug prices of 30 and 90-day prescriptions at the same dose of each medication. Using Good Rx prescription drug search engine, we compared the drug prices of the cheapest mail order and local in person pharmacies near our zip code. We also included prices for the recently started telemedicine company Roman. To compare if MCCPDC could offer savings to patients using health insurance to fill their prescriptions, we extracted the out-of-pocket drug costs for patients from the 2020 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS; a national survey that compiles data from both the pharmacy and the survey respondent to determine the exact cost of each prescription filled during that year) and the 2020 Medicare Part D spending data. Medicare Part D spending data was used to estimate the out-of-pocket cost for each medication, which is approximately a 25% copayment for Medicare prescriptions. Results MCCPDC offered the lowest direct-to-consumer price on sildenafil and tadalafil 90-day prescriptions (Table 1). MCCPDC saved patients approximately $10 per sildenafil and tadalafil prescription compared with the next cheapest option. We found additional, although smaller, savings at 30-day prescriptions for sildenafil and tadalafil. MCCPDC was not the cheapest option for vardenafil. Compared with Roman, MCCPDC offered cheaper prescriptions for sildenafil and tadalafil by over $300 and $900, respectively. Conclusions MCCPDC can offer significant cost savings to patients, especially considering the high number of sildenafil and tadalafil prescriptions each year. The transparency and consistency in pricing with MCCPDC can be utilized by providers when counseling patients on medical therapy options for erectile dysfunction. Disclosure No.

Strategies to reduce out-of-pocket medication costs for Canadians with peripheral arterial disease.

Given that peripheral arterial disease (PAD) disproportionately affects people of lower socioeconomic status, out-of-pocket expenses for preventive medications are a major barrier to their use. We carried out a cost comparison of drug therapies for PAD to identify prescribing strategies that minimize out-of-pocket expenses for these medications. Between March and June 2019, we contacted outpatient pharmacies in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, to assess pricing of pharmacologic therapies at dosages included in the 2016 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guideline for management of lower extremity PAD. We also gathered pricing information for supplementary charges, including delivery, pill splitting and blister packaging. We calculated prescription prices with and without dispensing fees for 30-day brand-name and generic prescriptions, and 90-day generic prescriptions. Twenty-four pharmacies, including hospital-based, independent and chain, were included in our sample. In the most extreme scenario, total 90-day medication costs could differ by up to $1377.26. Costs were affected by choice of agent within a drug class, generic versus brand-name drug, quantity dispensed, dispensing fee and delivery cost, if any. By opting for prescriptions for 90 days or as long as possible, selecting the lowest-cost generic drugs available in each drug class, and identifying dispensing locations with lower fees, prescribers can minimize out-of-pocket patient medication expenses. This may help improve adherence to guideline-recommended therapies for the secondary prevention of vascular events in patients with PAD.

Prescription Opioid Use before and after Diagnosis of Cancer Among Older Cancer Survivors With Non-Cancer Chronic Pain Conditions (NCPCs): An Application of Group-Based Trajectory Modeling (GBTM).

Prescription opioids are essential in managing pain among adults with chronic pain conditions. However, persistent use over time can lead to negative health consequences. Identifying individuals with persistent use over time and their characteristics can inform clinical decision-making and aid in reducing the risk of abuse and overdose deaths. This study aims to examine trajectories of prescription opioid use over time and factors associated with these trajectories among older cancer survivors with any non-cancer pain conditions (NCPC). We conducted a retrospective cohort study design with longitudinal data of older (age at cancer diagnosis ≥67years) cancer (incident breast, colorectal, and prostate cancers, or non-Hodgkin lymphoma) survivors with any NCPC. Data were derived from the 2007-2015 linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare dataset (N = 35,071). Group-Based Trajectory Modeling (GBTM) was used to identify homogeneous subgroups (distinct trajectories) of individuals based on every 90-day prescription opioid use during pre-cancer diagnosis (t1-t4), acute cancer treatment (t5-t8), and post-cancer treatment (t9-t12) periods. Biological factors, social determinants of health (SDoH), physical and mental health, medication use, health care use, and external factors associated with a trajectory membership were analyzed with multivariable multinomial logistic regressions. Four distinct trajectories of opioid use were identified: (1) increase-decrease use (6.1%); (2) short-term use after cancer diagnosis (40.6%); (3) low-use (41.0%); and (4) persistent use (12.3%). In the fully-adjusted multinomial logistic regression, the SDoH such as Non-Hispanic Black [adjusted odds ratios (AOR) = 1.69; 95%CI = 1.48, 1.93)] and rural residence (AOR = 1.49; 95%CI = 1.15, 1.94)], comorbid anxiety (AOR = 1.33; 95%CI = 1.18, 1.51), and medication use (NSAIDs - AOR = 1.20; 95%CI = 1.10, 1.30) were associated with membership in the persistent use group. Persistent use was less likely among those with higher fragmented care index (AOR = 0.95, 95%CI = 0.93, 0.97) and those living in counties with higher Medicare advantage penetration (AOR = 0.96; 95%CI = 0.95, 0.97). One in eight older adults had persistent opioid use over time. The profile characteristics of this group were different from the other trajectory groups. Policies and programs to reduce chronic opioid use need to consider the intra- and inter-individual variability to reduce opioid-related morbidity and mortality.

Impact of in-hospital initiation of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction

Abstract Introduction Safety and early clinical benefit make sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT-2i) therapy suitable for in-hospital initiation in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Despite randomized controlled trials and guideline recommendations, they are underused and clinical inertia may play a role. Objectives Primary: To assess the impact of initiating SGLT-2i at discharge on 90-day prescription rates in patients with HFrEF during hospitalization for acute heart failure (AHF). Secondary: To evaluate the presence of contraindications at discharge and the independent factors associated with in-hospital prescription, and to assess clinical outcomes at 90 days. Methods Retrospective analysis of a consecutive prospective single-center cohort. Adult patients hospitalized between January 2021 and October 2022 with a primary diagnosis of AHF and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) &amp;lt;40% were included. Patients who underwent heart transplantation during hospitalization, used SGLT2i before admission, died or were referred during the index hospitalization were excluded. Those who started SGLT-2i before or at discharge were compared with those who did not. The primary outcome was SGLT-2i prescription rate at 90 days, and the exploratory secondary endpoints was the composite of hospitalization or urgent visit for AHF or all-cause mortality at 90 days. Independent factors associated with inpatient SGLT-2i prescription were analyzed using a logistic regression model. Results Among 378 patients with documented HFrEF, 240 (64%) met the inclusion criteria. Mean age was 76±11 years, 75.4% were male and the mean LVEF was 25±13%. SGLT-2i was indicated during hospitalization in 31.6% of patients. A total of 86% of the cohort had a 90-day follow-up, and the SGLT2i prescription rate was 94.2% in those with in-hospital initiation and 14.4% in those without (p&amp;lt;0.001). Among those without contraindications at discharge (n=141), the independent factor associated with inpatient prescription was lower age, OR 0.96 (0.93-0.99) for each year. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups for the combined endpoint of all-cause death, HF rehospitalisation or unplanned HF visit at 90 days (p=0.3). Conclusions In-hospital initiation of SGLT-2-i was associated with significantly higher prescription rates 90 days after discharge, without differences in death from all causes and hospitalization or urgent visit for AHF at 90 days. This study reflects the presence of medical inertia, particularly in older patients. It also highlights the hospitalization period as an optimal time to start SGLT-2i and achieve the proven clinical benefits that accumulate rapidly over weeks, with solid safety and tolerability.

Appendectomy Pain Medication Prescribing Variation inthe U.S. Military Health System.

Post-appendectomy opioid prescription practices may vary widely across and within health care systems. Although guidelines encourage conservative opioid prescribing and prescribing of non-opioid pain medications, the variation of prescribing practices and the probability of opioid refill remain unknown in the U.S. Military Health System. This retrospective observational cohort study evaluated medical data of 11,713 patients who received an appendectomy in the Military Health System between January 2016 and June 2021. Linear-mixed and generalized linear-mixed models evaluated the relationships between patient-, care-, and system-level factors and the two primary outcomes; the morphine equivalent dose (MED) at hospital discharge; and the probability of 30-day opioid prescription refill. Sensitivity analyses repeated the generalized linear-mixed model predicting the probability of opioid (re)fill after an appendectomy, but with inclusion of the full sample, including patients who had not received a discharge opioid prescription (e.g., 0 mg MED). Discharge MED was twice the recommended guidance and was not associated with opioid refill. Higher discharge MED was associated with opioid/non-opioid combination prescription (+38 mg) relative to opioid-only, lack of non-opioid prescribing at discharge (+6 mg), care received before a Defense Health Agency opioid safety policy was released (+61 mg), documented nicotine dependence (+8 mg), and pre-appendectomy opioid prescription (+5 mg) (all P < .01). Opioid refill was more likely for patients with complicated appendicitis (OR = 1.34; P < .01); patients assigned female (OR = 1.25, P < .01); those with a documented mental health diagnosis (OR = 1.32, P = .03), an antidepressant prescription (OR = 1.84, P < .001), or both (OR = 1.54, P < .001); and patients with documented nicotine dependence (OR = 1.53, P < .001). Opioid refill was less likely for patients who received care after the Defense Health Agency policy was released (OR = 0.71, P < .001), were opioid naive (OR = 0.54, P < .001), or were Asian or Pacific Islander (relative to white patients, OR = 0.68, P = .04). Results from the sensitivity analyses were similar to the main analysis, aside from two exceptions. The probability of refill no longer differed by race and ethnicity or mental health condition only. Individual prescriber practices shifted with new guidelines, but potentially unwarranted variation in opioid prescribing dose remained. Future studies may benefit from evaluating patients' experiences with pain management, satisfaction, and patient-centered education after appendectomy within the context of opioid prescribing practices, amount of medications used, and refill probability. Such could pave a way for standardized patient-centered procedures that both decrease unwarranted prescribing pattern variability and optimize pain management regimens.

Abstract 17514: Changing Default Prescription Length to Reduce Barriers to Statin Adherence

Introduction: Statins substantially reduce cardiovascular risk, yet adherence is suboptimal. 90-day prescription fills are associated with better adherence than 30-day fills, though many prescriptions are not written for 90 days. We evaluated the effect of changing default prescription length to 90 days within the electronic health record (EHR) on the proportion of statin prescriptions written for 90 days. Methods: At a single academic health system, we changed the default duration for statin prescriptions written using the primary care preference list within the EHR to 90 pills with 3 refills, while still allowing providers to make a manual change. We compared the proportion of prescriptions written for 90 days over the 4 months before the change (pre-intervention) and 4 months after the change (post-intervention) using a chi-square test, along with need to change prescription dose or drug during the 90-day period after the prescription was written, a potential unintended consequence. Results: Among statin prescriptions written using the primary care prescription preference list, the rate of prescriptions written for 90 days increased from 70.6% pre-intervention to 90.1% post-intervention (p&lt;0.001). Pre-intervention, patients with Medicaid insurance, median ZIP code household income &lt; $50,000, and Black race were significantly less likely to be prescribed a 90-day statin supply (p &lt;0.05). The intervention increased the proportion of 90-day prescriptions more in these groups (interaction p &lt; 0.01), and they were no longer less likely to be prescribed a 90-day supply in the post-intervention period. Post-intervention, there was no change in the proportion of patients that needed a change in prescription during the active prescription time period (p=0.15). Conclusion: Changing default options significantly increased the proportion of statin prescriptions written for 90 days and closed baseline equity gaps without restricting patient or physician choice.

Postoperative Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Use is Associated With Decreased Rates of Manipulation Under Anesthesia, Arthroscopic Lysis of Adhesions, and Prosthesis-Related Complications in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty

BackgroundThe cellular mechanisms underlying excess scar tissue formation in arthrofibrosis following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are well-described. Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), particularly losartan, is a commonly prescribed antihypertensive with demonstrated antifibrotic properties. This retrospective study aimed to assess the rates of 1- and 2-year postoperative complications in patients who filled prescriptions for ARBs during the 90 days after TKA. MethodsPatients undergoing primary TKA were selected from a large national insurance database, and the impact of ARB use after TKA on complications was assessed. Of the 1,299,106 patients who underwent TKA, 82,065 had filled at least a 90-day prescription of losartan, valsartan, or olmesartan immediately following their TKA. The rates of manipulation under anesthesia (MUA), arthroscopic lysis of adhesions (LOA), aseptic loosening, periprosthetic fracture, and revision at 1 and 2 years following TKA were analyzed using multivariable logistic regressions to control for various comorbidities. ResultsARB use was associated with decreased rates of MUA (odds ratio [OR] = 0.94, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.90 to 0.99), arthroscopy/LOA (OR = 0.86, 95% CI, 0.77 to 0.95), aseptic loosening (OR = 0.71, 95% CI, 0.61 to 0.83), periprosthetic fracture (OR = 0.58, 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.71), and revision (OR = 0.79, 95% CI, 0.74 to 0.85) 2 years after TKA. ConclusionsARB use throughout the 90 days after TKA is associated with a decreased risk of MUA, arthroscopy/LOA, aseptic loosening, periprosthetic fracture, and revision, demonstrating the potential protective abilities of ARBs. Prospective studies evaluating the use of ARBs in patients at risk for postoperative stiffness would be beneficial to further elucidate this association.

Wide-Awake Carpal Tunnel Release in the United States: Trends in Volume and Reimbursement by Operative Setting.

Office-based surgery can increase logistical and financial efficiency for patients and surgeons. The current study compares wide-awake, office-based carpal tunnel release to wide-awake operations performed in the operating room in terms of volume, financial burden, narcotic prescriptions, and adverse events. Operations performed under local-only anesthesia from 2010 to 2020 were identified in a national administrative database (PearlDiver). Patients were grouped by surgical setting and matched based on age, sex, comorbidity burden, and geographic region. Primary endpoints included total disbursement and physician reimbursement, and 30-day narcotics prescriptions, emergency department (ED) visits, and surgical site infections (SSIs). Before matching, there were 303,741 operating room operations and 5463 office operations. From 2010 to 2020, the percentage of operations in the office increased from 1.2% to 3.4%. Matched cohorts included 21,835 operating room operations and 5459 office operations. Office surgery was associated with lower total disbursement and physician reimbursement for patients with commercial insurance, Medicaid, and Medicare. Linear regression modeling indicated that office-based surgery was significantly associated with lower total disbursement and physician reimbursement. Fewer office patients filled narcotic prescriptions and visited the ED, and there was no difference in SSIs. Compared with operating room surgery, office surgery was associated with lower financial burden, fewer narcotics prescriptions and ED visits, and a similar incidence of SSIs. These findings, together with literature showing greater efficiency in the office, suggest that office-based operations are safe and cost-effective and should continue to grow. Therapeutic, III.

Wide Awake Trigger Finger Releases Performed in the United States: Trends in Volume, Operative Setting, and Reimbursement.

Trigger finger release (TFR) has traditionally been performed in outpatient operating rooms. More recently, TFR may be performed in the office setting to achieve greater efficiency and cost savings. The 2010-2020 Q2 PearlDiver M91Ortho data set was analyzed for cases of TFR. Exclusion criteria were age less than 18 years, <30 days of postoperative records, concomitant hand surgery, monitored anesthesia use, and inpatient surgery. Age, sex, and Elixhauser comorbidity index were recorded. Operating room and office procedures were matched 4:1 based on patient characteristics. Total and physician reimbursement for the day of surgery, as well as 30-day narcotics prescriptions, emergency department (ED) visits, and surgical site infections (SSI) were determined. Before matching, TFRs were found to be increasingly performed in the office (from 7.9% in 2010 to 14.6% in 2020). Matched cohorts consisted of 63,951 operating room and 15,992 office procedures. Office procedures had lower mean total reimbursements ($435 vs $752, P < 0.001), slightly lower mean physician reimbursements ($420 vs $460, P < 0.001), and lower rates of narcotic prescriptions (30.5% vs 50.5%, P < 0.001) and 30-day ED visits (2.2% vs 2.9%, P < 0.05). There was no difference in 30-day SSI (0.5% vs 0.6%, P = 0.374). In-office TFR is becoming increasingly prevalent. After matching, in-office TFRs were associated with lesser costs to the system, lower narcotic prescriptions, and fewer postoperative ED visits, without increased SSI. Although it is important to perform procedures in the best location for the patient, physician, and system, the current study supports the increased value offered by in-office TFR.

Persistence in a pharmacist-led, same-day PrEP program in Mississippi: a mixed-methods study

IntroductionMississippi has one of the highest rates of HIV in the United States but low PrEP uptake. Understanding patterns of PrEP use can improve PrEP initiation and persistence.MethodsThis is a mixed-method evaluation of a PrEP program in Jackson, Mississippi. Between November 2018-December 2019, clients at high risk for HIV attending a non-clinical testing site were referred to a pharmacist for same-day PrEP initiation. The pharmacist provided a 90-day PrEP prescription and scheduled a follow-up clinical appointment within three months. We linked client records from this visit to electronic health records from the two largest PrEP clinics in Jackson to determine linkage into ongoing clinical care. We identified four distinct PrEP use patterns, which we used for qualitative interview sampling: 1) filled a prescription and linked into care within three months; 2) filled a prescription and linked into care after three months; 3) filled a prescription and never linked into care; and 4) never filled a prescription. In 2021, we purposively sampled patients in these four groups for individual interviews to ascertain barriers and facilitators to PrEP initiation and persistence, using guides informed by the Theory of Planned Behavior.ResultsThere were 121 clients evaluated for PrEP; all were given a prescription. One-third were less than 25 years old, 77% were Black, and 59% were cisgender men who have sex with men. One-quarter (26%) never filled their PrEP prescription, 44% picked up the prescription but never linked into clinical care, 12% linked into care at some point after three months (resulting in a gap in PrEP coverage), and 18% linked into care within 3 months. We interviewed 26 of 121 clients. Qualitative data revealed that cost, stigmas related to sexuality and HIV, misinformation about PrEP, and perceived side effects were barriers to uptake and persistence. Individuals’ desire to stay healthy and the support of PrEP clinic staff were facilitators.ConclusionsThe majority of individuals given a same-day PrEP prescription either never started PrEP or stopped PrEP within the first three months. Addressing noted barriers of stigma and misinformation and reducing structural barriers may increase PrEP initiation and persistence.

Projected Savings for Generic Oncology Drugs Purchased via Mark Cuban Cost Plus Drug Company Versus in Medicare.

Self-administered oncology drugs contribute disproportionately to Medicare Part D spending; prices often remain high even after generic entry. Outlets for low-cost drugs such as Mark Cuban Cost Plus Drug Company (MCCPDC) offer opportunities for decreased Medicare, Part D, and beneficiary spending. We estimate potential savings if Part D plans obtained prices such as those offered under the MCCPDC for seven generic oncology drugs. Using the 2020 Medicare Part D Spending dashboard, Q3-2022 Part D formulary prices, and Q3-2022 MCCPDC prices for seven self-administered generic oncology drugs, we estimated Medicare savings by replacing Q3-2022 Part D unit costs with costs under the MCCPDC plan. We estimate potential savings of $661.8 million (M) US dollars (USD; 78.8%) for the seven oncology drugs studied. Total savings ranged from $228.1M USD (56.1%) to $2,154.5M USD (92.4%) compared with 25th and 75th percentiles of Part D plan unit prices. The median savings replacing Part D plan prices were abiraterone $338.0M USD, anastrozole $1.2M USD, imatinib 100 mg $15.6M USD, imatinib 400 mg $212.0M USD, letrozole $1.9M USD, methotrexate $26.7M USD, raloxifene $63.8M USD, and tamoxifen $2.6M USD. All 30-day prescription drug prices offered by MCCPDC generated cost savings except for three drugs offered at the 25th percentile Part D formulary pricing: anastrozole, letrozole, and tamoxifen. Replacing current Part D median formulary prices with MCCPDC pricing could yield significant savings for seven generic oncology drugs. Individual beneficiaries could save nearly $25,200 USD per year for abiraterone or between $17,500 USD and $20,500 USD for imatinib. Notably, Part D cash-pay prices for abiraterone and imatinib under the catastrophic phase of coverage were still more expensive than baseline MCCPDC prices.

Buprenorphine use and setting type among reproductive-aged women self-reporting nonmedical prescription opioid use

IntroductionScreening for opioid misuse and treatment for opioid use disorder are critical for reducing morbidity and mortality. We sought to understand the extent of self-reported past 30-day buprenorphine use in various settings among women of reproductive age with self-reported nonmedical prescription opioid use being assessed for substance use problems. MethodsThe study collected data from individuals being assessed for substance use problems using the Addiction Severity Index–Multimedia Version in 2018–2020. We stratified the sample of 10,196 women ages 12–55 self-reporting past 30-day nonmedical prescription opioid use by buprenorphine use and setting type. We categorized setting types as: buprenorphine in specialty addiction treatment, buprenorphine in office-based opioid treatment, and diverted buprenorphine. We included each woman's first intake assessment during the study period. The study assessed number of buprenorphine products, reasons for using buprenorphine, and sources of buprenorphine procurement. The study calculated frequency of reasons for using buprenorphine to treat opioid use disorder outside of a doctor-managed treatment, overall and by race/ethnicity. ResultsOverall, 25.5 % of the sample used buprenorphine in specialty addiction treatment, 6.1 % used buprenorphine prescribed in office-based treatment, 21.7 % used diverted buprenorphine, and 46.7 % reported no buprenorphine use during the past 30 days. Among women who reported using buprenorphine to treat opioid use disorder, but not as part of a doctor-managed treatment, 72.3 % could not find a provider or get into a treatment program, 21.8 % did not want to be part of a program or see a provider, and 6.0 % reported both; a higher proportion of American Indian/Alaska Native women (92.1 %) reported that they could not find a provider or get into a treatment program versus non-Hispanic White (78.0 %), non-Hispanic Black (76.0 %), and Hispanic (75.0 %) women. ConclusionsAppropriate screening for nonmedical prescription opioid use to assess need for treatment with medication for opioid use disorder is important for all women of reproductive age. Our data highlight opportunities to improve treatment program accessibility and availability and support the need to increase equitable access for all women.

Impact of prescription length supply policy on patient medication adherence in Thailand

BackgroundPhramongkutklao Hospital is one of the largest military hospitals in Thailand. Beginning in 2016, an institutional policy was implemented in which medication prescription length was increased from 30 to 90 days. However, there have been no formal investigations into how this policy has impacted medication adherence among patients in hospitals. As such, this study evaluated how prescription length impacted medication adherence among dyslipidemia and type-2 diabetes patients who were treated at Phramongkutklao Hospital.MethodsThis pre-post implementation study compared patients who received prescription lengths of 30 and 90 days based on information recorded in the hospital database between 2014 and 2017. Therein, we used the medication possession ratio (MPR) to estimate patient adherence. Focusing on patients with universal coverage insurance, we employed the difference-in-difference method to examine changes in adherence from before and after policy implementation, then conducted a logistic regression to test for associations between the predictors and adherence.ResultsWe analyzed data from a total of 2,046 patients, with equal amounts of 1,023 placed into the control group (no change to 90-day prescription length) and intervention group (change from 30 to 90-day prescription length). First, we found that increased prescription length was associated with 4% and 5% higher MPRs among dyslipidemia and diabetes patients in the intervention group, respectively. Second, we found that medication adherence was correlated with sex, comorbidities, history of hospitalization, and the number of prescribed medications.ConclusionIncreasing the prescription length from 30 to 90 days improved medication adherence in both the dyslipidemia and type-2 diabetes patients. This shows that the policy change was successful for patients in the hospital considered for this study.

Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug Use and Its Effect on Long-term Opioid Use in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis.

The prevalence of chronic pain is high in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), increasing the risk for opioid use. The objective of this study was to assess disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) use and its effect on long-term opioid use in patients with RA. This cohort study included Medicare beneficiaries with diagnosis of RA who received at least 30-day consecutive prescription of opioids in 2017 (n = 23,608). The patients were grouped into non-DMARD and DMARD users, who were further subdivided into regimens set forth by the American College of Rheumatology. The outcome measured was long-term opioid use in 2018 defined as at least 90-day consecutive prescription of opioids. Dose and duration of opioid use were also assessed. A multivariable model identifying factors associated with non-DMARD use was also performed. Compared with non-DMARD users, the odds of long-term opioid use were significantly lower among DMARD users (odds ratio, 0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.83-0.95). All regimens except non-tumor necrosis factor biologic + methotrexate were associated with lower odds of long-term opioid use relative to non-DMARD users. The mean total morphine milligram equivalent, morphine milligram equivalent per day, and total days of opioid use were lower among DMARD users compared with non-DMARD users. Older age, male sex, Black race, psychiatric and medical comorbidities, and not being seen by a rheumatologist were significantly associated with non-DMARD use. Disease-modifying antirheumatic drug use was associated with lower odds of long-term opioid use among RA patients with baseline opioid prescription. Factors associated with non-DMARD use represent a window of opportunity for intervention to improve pain-related quality of life in patients living with RA.

Associations between prescription stimulant use as prescribed, nonmedical use, and illicit stimulant use among adults evaluated for substance use treatment, 2017-2021

BackgroundLimited data exist on risk factors for illicit stimulant use, including associations between prescription stimulant use/nonmedical use (NMU) and illicit stimulant use. MethodsWe used 2017–2021 data from adults assessed for substance use disorder (SUD) treatment using the National Addictions Vigilance Intervention and Prevention Program Addiction Severity Index-Multimedia Version® tool. Multivariable Poisson regression models analyzed associations between past 30-day prescription stimulant use as prescribed or NMU and past 30-day illicit stimulant use. Separate models examined past 30-day illicit stimulant, methamphetamine, and cocaine use. We explored problem severity across seven biopsychosocial domains (e.g., drug, psychiatric, family) by past 30-day prescription stimulant use/NMU and illicit stimulant use. ResultsAmong 218,981 assessments, 1.8% reported prescription stimulant NMU; 1.6% reported use as prescribed. Past 30-day prescription stimulant NMU (vs. no use) was associated with past 30-day illicit stimulant use (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR] [95% CI]: 2.67 [2.59, 2.75]), methamphetamine use (aPR: 2.81 [2.71, 2.92]), and cocaine use (aPR: 3.53 [3.33, 3.74]). Prescription stimulant use as prescribed (vs. no use) was associated with lower prevalence of past 30-day illicit stimulant use. Assessments reporting prescription stimulant NMU (vs. no use, or use as prescribed) appeared more likely to have moderate-to-extreme problem scores across biopsychosocial domains, indicating greater need for treatment or assistance. Assessments reporting prescription stimulant use as prescribed or NMU frequently reported opioids, alcohol, or other substances as their primary substance problem. ConclusionsAdults using illicit stimulants/nonmedically using prescription stimulants may benefit from care addressing polysubstance use, mental health, social, and recovery support services.

Polypharmacy among medicaid-insured children with and without documented obesity.

Polypharmacy increases the risk of drug-drug interactions and adverse drug events. As obesity and rates of obesity-associated comorbid chronic conditions continue to rise, an improved understanding of whether children with obesity experience higher risk of polypharmacy is needed. This study aimed to compare chronic medication polypharmacy prevalence among children with and without a diagnosis of obesity. We performed a cross-sectional examination of prescription data for children aged 2-18 years prescribed ≥1 chronic medication using the 2019 Marketscan Medicaid database. Children with documented obesity were identified using medical visit diagnosis codes. Chronic medications included any ≥30-day prescription with ≥2 dispensed refills. Polypharmacy was defined as the prescription of ≥2 chronic medications for ≥1 overlapping days. Chi-squared tests compared polypharmacy prevalence and the distribution of chronic medication classes between children with and without obesity. Logistic regression determined the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of polypharmacy for children with obesity, adjusting for relevant demographic and clinical differences. Of 634,671 included children, 12.2% had documented obesity. More than one-half (52.7%) of children with obesity experienced polypharmacy compared with 47.6% of children without obesity (aOR 1.06 [95% confidence interval 1.04-1.08]). Chronic medication prescriptions, particularly for psychiatric and asthma medications, were more commonly prescribed among children with obesity than those without obesity. Children with documented obesity have higher polypharmacy prevalence than children without obesity. Clinicians must be aware of this risk and minimize inappropriate polypharmacy whenever possible. Future work should examine the consequences of polypharmacy, including drug-drug interactions and adverse drug events in children with obesity.