90-day Functional Independence Research Articles

CLEAR Thrombectomy Score: An Index to Estimate the Probability of Good Functional Outcome With or Without Endovascular Treatment in the Late Window for Anterior Circulation Occlusion.

With the expanding eligibility for endovascular therapy (EVT) of patients presenting in the late window (6-24 hours after last known well), we aimed to derive a score to predict favorable outcomes associated with EVT versus best medical management. A multinational observational cohort of patients from the CLEAR (Computed Tomography for Late Endovascular Reperfusion) study with proximal intracranial occlusion (2014-2022) was queried (n=58 sites). Logistic regression analyses were used to derive a 9-point score for predicting good functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 0-2 or return to premorbid modified Rankin Scale score) at 90 days, with sensitivity analyses for prespecified subgroups conducted using bootstrapped random forest regressions. Secondary outcomes included 90-day functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score 0-2), poor outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 5-6), and 90-day survival. The score was externally validated with a single-center cohort (2014-2023). Of the 3231 included patients (n=2499 EVT), a 9-point score included age, early computed tomography ischemic changes, and stroke severity, with higher points indicating a higher probability of a good functional outcome. The areas under the curve for the primary outcome among EVT and best medical management subgroups were 0.72 (95% CI, 0.70-0.74) and 0.87 (95% CI, 0.84-0.90), respectively, with similar performance in the external validation cohort (area under the curve, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.66-0.76]). There was a significant interaction between the score and EVT for good functional outcome, functional independence, and poor outcome (all Pinteraction<0.001), with greater benefit favoring patients with lower and midrange scores. This score is a pragmatic tool that can estimate the probability of a good outcome with EVT in the late window. URL: https://www.Clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04096248.

A Multimodal Ensemble Deep Learning Model for Functional Outcome Prognosis of Stroke Patients.

The accurate prediction of functional outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is crucial for informed clinical decision-making and optimal resource utilization. As such, this study aimed to construct an ensemble deep learning model that integrates multimodal imaging and clinical data to predict the 90-day functional outcomes after AIS. We used data from the Korean Stroke Neuroimaging Initiative database, a prospective multicenter stroke registry to construct an ensemble model integrated individual 3D convolutional neural networks for diffusion-weighted imaging and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), along with a deep neural network for clinical data, to predict 90-day functional independence after AIS using a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) of 3-6. To evaluate the performance of the ensemble model, we compared the area under the curve (AUC) of the proposed method with that of individual models trained on each modality to identify patients with AIS with an mRS score of 3-6. Of the 2,606 patients with AIS, 993 (38.1%) achieved an mRS score of 3-6 at 90 days post-stroke. Our model achieved AUC values of 0.830 (standard cross-validation [CV]) and 0.779 (time-based CV), which significantly outperformed the other models relying on single modalities: b-value of 1,000 s/mm2 (P<0.001), apparent diffusion coefficient map (P<0.001), FLAIR (P<0.001), and clinical data (P=0.004). The integration of multimodal imaging and clinical data resulted in superior prediction of the 90-day functional outcomes in AIS patients compared to the use of a single data modality.

Endovascular treatment of stroke in the late time window with large vessel occlusion using the ASPECTS as an imaging screening criterion

To assess the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) screening tool for effectiveness in endovascular treatment of late time window stroke with large vessel occlusion. A retrospective analysis was performed of individuals administered endovascular treatment in our neurology department between 2016 and 2020 for ischemic stroke induced by acute large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation and ASPECTS ≥ 6. Detailed baseline and endovascular treatment data were collected. Patients were assigned to 2 groups based on stroke onset time, including the 0–6 h (treated within 6 h of stroke onset) and 6–24 h (earlier/unknown time of onset, up to 24 h from the last time of appearing normal) groups. Both groups were compared for baseline information, revascularization rates, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and 90-day functional independence. Totally 221 individuals were enrolled. The 0–6 h and 6–24 h groups had 129 and 92 patients, respectively, whose median ages were 64 and 63 years, respectively. Both groups were similar in previous medical history, NIHSS score at onset, lesion location and surgical complications. The 6–24 h group had elevated intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (48.9 vs. 33.3%, P = 0.020) and revascularization (96.7 vs. 86.8%, P = 0.011) rates versus the 6–24 h group. Upon adjustment for age, sex, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, ASPECTS, Intracranial atherosclerosis, intraoperative tirofiban, stent detachment, successful recanalization, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, the 0-6 h group had a higher rate of individuals achieving functional independence (mRS score of 0–2; 52.7 vs. 47.8%, OR = 0.242 [0.070–0.833], P = 0.024). However, the rates of individuals with a favorable outcome (mRS scores of 0–3) were similar in both groups (66.7 vs. 69.6%; OR = 0.564 [0.140–2.266], P = 0.419) as well as 90-d mortality (OR = 0.889 [0.170–4.660], P = 0.889). The ASPECTS is effective for screening individuals for endovascular treatment of stroke in the late time window with large vessel occlusion. The ASPECTS should be considered a simple and practical patient screening strategy for stroke centers without multimodal imaging evaluation.

Noncontrast CT Selected Thrombectomy vs Medical Management for Late-Window Anterior Large Vessel Occlusion.

There is uncertainty whether patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) presenting in the late 6-hour to 24-hour time window can be selected for endovascular therapy (EVT) by noncontrast CT (NCCT) and CT angiography (CTA) for LVO detection. We evaluated the clinical outcomes of patients selected for EVT by NCCT compared with those medically managed in the extended time window. This multinational cohort study was conducted at 66 sites across 10 countries. Consecutive patients with proximal anterior LVO stroke selected for EVT by NCCT or medically managed and presenting within 6-24 hours of time last seen well (TSLW) from January 2014 to May 2022 were included. The primary end point was the 90-day ordinal shift in the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score. Inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) and multivariable methods were used. Of 5,098 patients screened, 839 patients were included, with a median (interquartile range) age of 75 (64-83) years; 455 (54.2%) were women. There were 616 patients selected to undergo EVT by NCCT (73.4%) and 223 (26.6%) who were medically managed. In IPTW analyses, there was a more favorable 90-day ordinal mRS shift in patients selected by NCCT to EVT vs those who were medically managed (odds ratio [OR] 1.99, 95% CI 1.53-2.59; p < 0.001). There were higher rates of 90-day functional independence (mRS 0-2) in the EVT group (40.1% vs 18.4%, OR 3.31, 95% CI 2.11-5.20; p < 0.001). sICH was nonsignificantly higher in the EVT group (8.5% vs 1.4%, OR 3.77, 95% CI 0.72-19.7, p = 0.12). Mortality at 90 days was lower in the EVT vs MM group (23.9% vs 32.3%, OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.45-0.83, p = 0.002). In patients with proximal anterior LVO in the extended time window, there was a lower rate of disability and mortality in patients selected with NCCT and CTA to EVT compared with those who were medically managed. These findings support the use of NCCT as a simpler and more inclusive approach to patient selection in the extended window. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under NCT04096248. This study provides Class III evidence that for patients with proximal anterior circulation occlusion presenting with ischemic stroke from 6 to 24 hours, compared with medical management, those undergoing thrombectomy based on NCCT have reduced disability and mortality at 90 days.

P.026 Success with incrementally faster times to endovascular therapy (SWIFT-EVT): a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Previous research demonstrates that for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) cases, rapid endovascular therapy (EVT) performance improves outcomes. This study provides updated metrics summarizing estimates for modified Rankin Scale (mRS) gains accrued by streamlining time to EVT. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis (MA) was conducted using electronic databases. Eligible studies reported time-benefit slope with times from AIS onset (or time last-seen-normal) to EVT commencement; the predictor was onset-to-groin (OTG) time. Primary and secondary outcomes were 90-day functional independence (mRS 0-2) and 90-day excellent function (mRS 0-1), respectively. Results: The five included studies showed increased chance of good outcome with each hour of pre-EVT time savings for mRS 0-2 for 0-270’ (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.16-1.35, I2 40%) and 271-360’ time frame (1.22, 95% CI 1.12-1.33, I2 58%). For studies assessing mRS 0-1, pooled effect estimates were appropriate for the 0-270’ time frame (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.19-1.51, I2 27%) and the 271-360’ time frame (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.03-1.38, I2 60%). Conclusions: Each hour saved from AIS onset to EVT start is associated with a 22-25% increased odds of functional independence, a useful metric to inform patient-specific and systems planning decisions.

Colour-coded collateral and venous outflow patterns in estimating infarct progression and predicting functional independence for stroke patients in late time window.

To investigate whether cerebral collateral and venous outflow (VO) patterns on colour-coded multi-phase computed tomography angiography (mCTA) can estimate ischaemic core growth rate (IGR) and predict 90-day functional independence for patients with late-presenting acute ischaemic stroke (AIS). The retrospective analysis included 127 AIS patients with a late time window. All patients underwent baseline mCTA with colour-coded reconstruction and computed tomography perfusion. Both collateral score and VO score on colour-coded mCTA maps were analysed and recorded. The IGR was calculated as ischaemic core volume divided by the time from onset to imaging. A 90-day modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2 was defined as functional independence. Kendall's Tau-b analysis was used for nonparametric correlation analysis. Propensity scores, logistic regressions, and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were applied to construct the prediction model. Moderate correlations were found between collateral delay and IGR (Tau-b = -0.554) and between VO and IGR (Tau-b = -0.501). High collateral score (odds ratio = 3.01) and adequate VO (odds ratio = 4.89) remained independent predictors for 90-day functional independence after adjustment. The joint predictive model, which integrated the VO score and clinical features, demonstrated an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.878. The AUCs of collateral score and VO score were 0.836 and 0.883 for outcome prediction after adjustment. Cerebral collateral and VO patterns based on colour-coded mCTA can effectively predict infarct progression and 90-day clinical outcomes, even for AIS patients beyond the routine time window. Colour-coded mCTA is a readily understandable post-processing technique for the rapid assessment of collateral circulation and VO status in stroke imaging. A moderate correlation was observed between the characteristics of collateral delay/VO on colour-coded mCTA and IGR in patients with AIS. Both high-quality collateral circulation and "red superficial middle cerebral vein sign" can predict 90-day functional independence even for patients beyond the routine time window.

Intensive Versus Standard Blood Pressure Management after Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Prospective clinical studies on blood pressure (BP) management targets after endovascular therapy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) have recently been published. Our objective was to assess the impact on clinical outcomes of BP management guided by established systolic BP (SBP) targets within the first 24 hours after successful EVT. Four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including 1556 participants across 5 SBP target settings identified from 5 databases up to September 6, 2023 were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. All the intensive SBP target groups in these RCTs were combined to facilitate head-to-head comparisons. Patients receiving intensive SBP management had lower risk of 90-day functional independence as assessed by the modified Rankin scale score (relative risk [RR], 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72 to 0.91; I2, 12%), excellent outcomes (RR,0.86; 95% CI, 0.75 to 0.99; I2, 7%), favorable outcomes (RR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.78 to 0.92; I2, 0%), and quality of life (standardized mean difference, -0.22; 95% CI, -0.35 to -0.10; I2,0%). There were no differences in the probability of any intracerebral hemorrhage (RR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.92 to 1.19; I2,0%), symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.60; I2, 0%), stroke-related death (RR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.80 to 1.68; I2, 0%), or parenchymal hematoma (RR, 1.71; 95% CI, 0.74 to 3.98; I2, 47%) between SBP targets. This meta-analysis provides evidence from RCTs suggesting that intensive SBP control (target<160mm Hg) may be detrimental to clinical outcomes in AIS patients with successful reperfusion after EVT.

Value of intravenous alteplase before thrombectomy among patients with tandem lesions and emergent carotid artery stenting: A subgroup analysis of the SWIFT DIRECT trial.

The value of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in eligible tandem lesion patients undergoing endovascular treatment (EVT) is unknown. We investigated treatment effect heterogeneity of EVT + IVT versus EVT-only in tandem lesion patients. Additional analyses were performed for patients undergoing emergent internal carotid artery (ICA) stenting. SWIFT DIRECT randomized IVT-eligible patients to either EVT + IVT or EVT-only. Primary outcome was 90-day functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score 0-2) after the index event. Secondary endpoints were reperfusion success, 24 h intracranial hemorrhage rate, and 90-day all-cause mortality. Interaction models were fitted for all predefined outcomes. Among 408 included patients, 63 (15.4%) had a tandem lesion and 33 (52.4%) received IVT. In patients with tandem lesions, 20 had undergone emergent ICA stenting (EVT + IVT: 9/33, 27.3%; EVT: 11/30, 36.7%). Tandem lesion did not show treatment effect modification of IVT on rates of functional independence (tandem lesion EVT + IVT vs. EVT: 63.6% vs. 46.7%, non-tandem lesion EVT + IVT vs. EVT: 65.6% vs. 58.2%; p for interaction = 0.77). IVT also did not increase the risk of intracranial hemorrhage among tandem lesion patients (tandem lesion EVT + IVT vs. EVT: 34.4% vs. 46.7%, non-tandem lesion EVT + IVT vs. EVT: 33.5% vs. 26.3%; p for interaction = 0.15). No heterogeneity was noted for other endpoints (p for interaction > 0.05). No treatment effect heterogeneity of EVT + IVT versus EVT-only was observed among tandem lesion patients. Administering IVT in patients with anticipated emergent ICA stenting seems safe, and the latter should not be a factor to consider when deciding to administer IVT before EVT.

Abstract WP211: Mechanical Thrombectomy in Patients With Mild Thrombocytopenia is Safe and Effective; a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: MT is a effective treatment for AIS patients with LVO, but MT on TP patients is risky due to lack of data and potential hemorrhage. Methods: Our review followed the PRISMA guidelines for systematic review and meta-analysis. We defined thrombocytopenia as platelet count ≤150х109/L, with further sub-classification into two groups: 1) Mild TP (Platelet count 100,000 - 149,000x109/L); 2) Moderate/severe TP (platelet count &lt;100х109/L). A favorable outcome was 90-day functional independence (mRS) ≤ 2). Unfavorable outcomes were mortality at 90 days and (sICH). Results: Compared to patients with normal platelets, patients with TP had no significant difference in outcomes (mRS &gt;2) at 90 days (RR 0.80 [95% CI: 0.69 - 0.94] p = 0.006). Further analysis based on sub-groups, the difference in mRS score was not statistically significant in patients with mild TP group (RR 0.84 [95% CI: 0.70 - 1.00] p = 0.05) and moderate/severe TP group (RR 0.71 [95% CI: 0.48 - 1.06] p = 0.09) when compared to patients with normal platelets. However Mortality was found to be higher in the TP group (RR 1.95 [95% CI: 1.62 - 2.36] p &lt; 0.00001), with similar trends of increased mortality in the mild and severe TP group (RR 1.88 [ 95% CI: 1.34 - 2.63] p = 0.0002 and RR 2.07 [95% CI: 1.46 - 2.92] p &lt; 0.0001). There was an overall slight increase in the incidence of sICH in the TP group (Relative Risk [RR] 2.47 [95% CI: 1.51 - 4.05], p = 0.0003) compared to patients with normal platelet counts, however subgroup demonstrated no significant higher risk in the mild thrombocytopenia group (RR 2.34 [95% CI: 1.24 - 4.40], p = 0.008) Conclusions: Mechanical thrombectomy for LVO in patients with mild thrombocytopenia is safe and does not increase the risk of sICH or worse outcomes. However, caution is advised in cases of moderate to severe thrombocytopenia, as there is a slightly higher risk of sICH and mortality. Nonetheless, we recommend thrombectomy for LVO patients with thrombocytopenia.

Abstract WMP92: Mode of Onset Modifies the Effect of Time to Endovascular Reperfusion on Clinical Outcomes After Acute Ischemic Stroke: An Analysis of the DAWN Trial

Introduction: In the early window, time to treatment with endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is inversely associated with favorable clinical outcomes but this remains unclear in the extended window. We aimed to assess the impact of time to EVT on clinical outcomes in the DAWN trial. Methods: The association between every 1-hour treatment delay with 90-day functional independence (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0-2), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH), and 90-day mortality was explored in the overall population and in three modes of onset subgroups (wake-up vs witnessed vs unwitnessed) considering both time from last seen well (TLSW) and time from symptoms first observed (TSFO). Results: Out of the 205 patients, 98 (47.8%) and 107 (52.2%) presented in the 6-12-hour and 12-24-hour time window, respectively. Considering all three modes of onset together, there was no statistically significant association between TLSW to randomization with either functional independence or mortality at 90 days in either the EVT (mRS0-2 OR 1-hour-delay:1.07;95%CI[0.93-1.24]; mRS6 OR:0.84;95%CI[0.65-1.03]) or medical management (mRS0-2 OR1-hour-delay:0.98;95%CI[0.80-1.14]; mRS6 OR 1-hour-delay:0.94;95%CI[0.79-1.09]) groups. Moreover, there was no significant interaction between treatment effect and time (p=0.439 and p=0.421 for mRS 0-2 and 6, respectively). However, within the thrombectomy group, the models that tested the association between TLSW to successful reperfusion (mTICI≥2b) and 90-day functional independence showed a significant interaction with mode of presentation (p=0.013). This appeared to be driven by a nominally positive slope for both witnessed and unwitnessed strokes versus a significantly (p=0.018) negative slope in wake-up patients. There was no association between treatment times and SICH. Comparable analysis using TSFO yielded similar results. Conclusion: In extended window patients, the association between time to treatment and clinical outcomes seems to be primarily driven by successfully perfused patients with wake-up rather than witnessed or unwitnessed strokes suggesting that wake-up strokes do not behave as “slow-progressors”.

Abstract 41: Conventional vs Advanced Imaging for the Selection of Stroke Therapy in the Extended Window (VESTA Study)

Background: The optimal imaging modality for treatment selection in the extended stroke window is uncertain. VESTA study (NCT05299034) compared conventional imaging (noncontrast CT + CT angiography) with advanced imaging (adding perfusion) in extended window stroke patients, focusing on EVT selection rate, safety and functional outcome. Methods: From the prospective Catalan Stroke Registry (CICAT, 29 centers) ischemic stroke patients within 6-24h of symptom onset and NIHSS ≥6 (Jan 2019 -Dec 2021) were selected. Imaging modality was decided according to the local site protocol. Images were re-evaluated by a central core lab with full access to each patient’s images. LVO was defined as intracranial ICA, M1 or proximal M2 occlusion. Blinded investigators centrally assessed 90-day functional independence, defined as mRS≤2. We employed a propensity score matching algorithm to adjust for age, sex, NIHSS, established infarct, and time from onset to arrival. Results: We included 1405 patients in the analysis (median age 76y, median NIHSS 11; 48% women). Conventional imaging was performed in 48% of patients, while 52% received advanced imaging. Patients receiving conventional vs. advanced imaging showed lower NIHSS (11 vs. 12, p=0.006), and lower rates of LVO (45% vs. 58%, p&lt;0.001) and EVT indication (33% vs. 41%, p=0.01). Demographics and time metrics were comparable between techniques. The matched adjusted analysis showed no differences between modalities in 90-day functional independence (OR=0.9 [0.7;1.2]), mortality (1.18 [0.9;1.6]), or symptomatic hemorrhage (OR=1.35 [0.47;3.8]). The figure displays subgroup analysis for patients arriving at a comprehensive stroke center and for patients with anterior LVO. Conclusions: Advanced imaging allowed the identification of more occlusions and the selection of more patients for EVT; however, patients undergoing either conventional or advanced imaging had similar clinical outcomes at 90 days.

Abstract 25: Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke in Patients With Recent Direct Oral Anticoagulant Use: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction: Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is efficacious treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS). However, certain circumstances associated with increased bleeding risk, such as recent direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC) intake limits its use. Nonetheless, emerging evidence has shown promising results in this patient group. We investigated the safety and efficacy of IVT in patients with AIS and recent DOAC use. Methods: We conducted systematic review and meta-analysis of proportions evaluating IVT with recent DOAC use. Outcomes of interest were symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), any ICH, serious systemic bleeding (SSB), and 90-day functional independence (mRS 0-2). Moreover, we calculated pooled odds ratios (OR) for each outcome using a random effect meta-analysis to compare the rates between the patients with DOAC and non-DOAC upon IVT. Ultimately, we completed a sensitivity analysis for idarucizumab, NIHSS, and the timing of DOAC administration. Results: Our meta-analysis included 14 studies with 247079 patients (3610 in DOAC and 243469 in non-DOAC). In the DOAC group, the rate of sICH was 3% (95%CI 3 - 4%), any ICH was 12% (95%CI 7 - 19%), SSB 0.7% (95%CI 0 - 1%), and 90-day mRS 0-2 was 57% (95%CI 43 - 70%). No difference in the rates of sICH (3.4vs.3.5%; OR=0.95; 95%CI 0.67 - 1.36), any ICH (17.7vs.17.3%; OR=1.23; 95%CI 0.61 - 2.48), SSB (0.7vs.0.6%; OR=1.27; 95%CI 0.79 - 2.02), and 90-day mRS 0-2 (46.4vs.56.8%; OR=1.21; 95%CI 0.400 - 3.67) was found between DOAC and non-DOAC groups. Subgroup analysis revealed no significant difference in the sICH rate between idaricuzumab and no idaricizumab administration prior to IVT [Figure 1]. Conclusions: Our analysis demonstrated no significant difference in functional independence and hemorrhagic complication rates in AIS patients treated with IVT with recent DOAC compared to the no-DOAC group. Further prospective randomized clinical trials are needed to shed more light on this topic.

Sex-Based Analysis of Workflow and Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Treated With Alteplase Versus Tenecteplase.

Understanding sex differences in stroke care is important in reducing potential disparities. Our objective was to explore sex differences in workflow efficiency, treatment efficacy, and safety in the AcT trial (Alteplase Compared to Tenecteplase). AcT was a multicenter, registry-linked randomized noninferiority trial comparing tenecteplase (0.25 mg/kg) with alteplase (0.9 mg/kg) in acute ischemic stroke within 4.5 hours of onset. In this post hoc analysis, baseline characteristics, workflow times, successful reperfusion (extended Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score ≥2b), symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, 90-day functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score, 0-1), and 90-day mortality were compared by sex. Mixed-effects regression analysis was used adjusting for age, stroke severity, and occlusion site for outcomes. Of 1577 patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis (2019-2022), 755 (47.9%) were women. Women were older (median, 77 [68-86] years in women versus 70 [59-79] years in men) and had a higher proportion of severe strokes (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score >15; 32.4% versus 24.9%) and large vessel occlusions (28.7% versus 21.5%) compared with men. All workflow times were comparable between sexes. Women were less likely to achieve functional independence (31.7% versus 39.8%; unadjusted relative risk, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.70-0.91]) and had higher mortality (17.7% versus 13.3%; unadjusted relative risk, 1.33 [95% CI, 1.06-1.69]). Adjusted analysis showed no difference in outcomes between sexes. Differences in prognostic factors of age, stroke severity, and occlusion site largely accounted for higher functional dependence and mortality in women. No sex disparities were apparent in workflow quality indicators. Given the integration of the AcT trial into clinical practice, these results provide reassurance that no major sex biases are apparent in acute stroke management throughout participating Canadian centers. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03889249.

Thrombectomy With the pRESET vs Solitaire Stent Retrievers as First-Line Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke Treatment

Stent retriever-based thrombectomy is highly beneficial in large vessel occlusion (LVO) strokes. Many stent retriever designs are currently available, but comparison of these technologies in well-conducted studies is lacking. To determine whether thrombectomy for LVO stroke with the pRESET stent retriever is noninferior to treatment with the Solitaire stent retriever. This study was a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label, adaptive, noninferiority trial with blinded primary end point evaluation. Between October 2019 and February 2022, multicenter participation occurred across 19 research hospitals and/or universities in the US and 5 in Germany. Patients with LVO stroke were enrolled and included up to 8 hours after symptom onset. Patients underwent 1:1 randomization to thrombectomy with the pRESET or Solitaire stent retriever. The primary outcome was the difference in the rate of 90-day functional independence across the 2 devices, using a -12.5% noninferiority margin for the lower bound of the 1-sided 95% CI of the difference between pRESET and Solitaire retrievers. Of 340 randomized patients, 170 (50.0%) were female, and the median (IQR) age was 73.0 (64.0-82.0) years. The study procedure was completed in 322 of the 340 randomized patients. The primary end point of 90-day functional independence was achieved by 95 patients (54.9%; 95% CI, 48.7-61.1) in the pRESET group and in 96 (57.5%; 95% CI, 51.2-63.8) in the Solitaire group (absolute difference, -2.57%; 95% CI, -11.42 to 6.28). As the lower bound of the 95% CI was greater than -12.5%, the pRESET retriever was deemed noninferior to the Solitaire retriever. The noninferiority of pRESET over Solitaire was also observed in the secondary clinical end point (90-day shift in modified Rankin Scale score) and in both angiographic end points (Expanded Treatment in Cerebral Infarction [eTICI] score of 2b50 or greater within 3 passes: 146 of 173 [84.4%] vs 149 of 167 [89.2%]; absolute difference, -4.83%; 95% CI, -10.84 to 1.19; eTICI of 2c or greater following the first pass: 76 of 173 [43.7%] vs 74 of 167 [44.3%]; absolute difference, -0.63%; 95% CI, -9.48 to 8.21). Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 0 patients in the pRESET group and 2 (1.2%) in the Solitaire group. Mortality occurred in 25 (14.5%) in the pRESET group and in 24 (14.4%) in the Solitaire group at 90 days. Findings of the per-protocol and as-treated analyses were in concordance with findings of the intention-to-treat analysis. In this study, among patients with LVO stroke, thrombectomy with the pRESET stent retriever was noninferior to thrombectomy with the Solitaire stent retriever. Findings suggest that pRESET offers a safe and effective option for flow restoration and disability reduction in patients with LVO stroke.

Short-Term Effect of Ambient Temperature in Acute Ischemic Stroke with Endovascular Treatment Due to Large Vessel Occlusion.

Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) stands as the primary cause of mortality and extended disability globally. While prior studies have examined the connection between stroke and local weather, they have produced conflicting results. Our goal was to examine the correlation between temperature and functional prognosis in patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) undergoing endovascular therapy (EVT). This study included a total of 1809 patients. Temperatures from stroke onset to groin puncture were categorized into Cold (10th percentile of temperature), Cool (10th-50th percentile of temperature), Warm (50th-90th percentile of temperature), and Hot (90th percentile of temperature) groups. The primary efficacy result was the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 90 days. Safety outcomes included mortality, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and complications after cerebral infarction. The primary efficacy results demonstrated a statistical enhancement in functional outcomes at 90 days for patients in the Warm group compared to the Cold group (adjusted common odds ratio [OR]: 1.386; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.024-1.878, P=0.035). Secondary efficacy results showed that temperature was associated with a higher rate of 90-day functional independence (adjusted OR: 1.016; 95% CI: 1.004-1.029; P=0.009), which was higher in the Warm group compared with patients in the Cold group (adjusted OR: 1.646; 95% CI: 1.107-2.448, P=0.014). There were no significant differences between groups in terms of sICH, 90-day mortality, and post-infarction complications. Compared with Cold temperature, Warm temperature is associated with better functional outcomes and reduced mortality risk without increasing the risk of sICH.

Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke in Patients With Recent Direct Oral Anticoagulant Use: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is an effective stroke therapy that remains underused. Currently, the use of IVT in patients with recent direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) intake is not recommended. In this study we aim to investigate the safety and efficacy of IVT in patients with acute ischemic stroke and recent DOAC use. A systematic review and meta-analysis of proportions evaluating IVT with recent DOAC use was conducted. Outcomes included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, any intracranial hemorrhage, serious systemic bleeding, and 90-day functional independence (modified Rankin scale score 0-2). Additionally, rates were compared between patients receiving IVT using DOAC and non-DOAC by a random effect meta-analysis to calculate pooled odds ratios (OR) for each outcome. Finally, sensitivity analysis for idarucizumab, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, and timing of DOAC administration was completed. Fourteen studies with 247 079 patients were included (3610 in DOAC and 243 469 in non-DOAC). The rates of IVT complications in the DOAC group were 3% (95% CI, 3-4) symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, 12% (95% CI, 7-19) any ICH, and 0.7% (95%CI, 0-1) serious systemic bleeding, and 90-day functional independence was achieved in 57% (95% CI, 43-70). The rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (3.4 versus 3.5%; OR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.67-1.36]), any intracranial hemorrhage (17.7 versus 17.3%; OR, 1.23 [95% CI, 0.61-2.48]), serious systemic bleeding (0.7 versus 0.6%; OR, 1.27 [95% CI, 0.79-2.02]), and 90-day modified Rankin scale score 0-2 (46.4 versus 56.8%; OR, 1.21 [95% CI, 0.400-3.67]) did not differ between DOAC and non-DOAC groups. There was no difference in symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage rate based on idarucizumab administration. Patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with IVT in recent DOAC versus non-DOAC use have similar rates of hemorrhagic complications and functional independence. Further prospective randomized trials are warranted.

Atrial Fibrillation and Clinical Outcomes of Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-Analysis of Adjusted Effect Estimates.

The impact of atrial fibrillation (AF) on the clinical outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) who received endovascular thrombectomy remains unclear. We aimed to perform a meta-analysis of adjusted effect estimates to examine the association between the presence of AF and the clinical outcomes in patients with AIS who received endovascular thrombectomy. We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane database between January 1, 2013 and July 10, 2023. Data were meta-analyzed to compare the outcomes among patients with AIS with and without AF who received endovascular thrombectomy. Our primary outcome was 90-day functional independence defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 2. Secondary outcomes included excellent independence (90-day modified Rankin Scale score of 0-1), 90-day mortality, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and any intracranial hemorrhage. Eighteen observational studies comprising 16 096 patients with AIS (mean age, 70.1 years; women, 48.2%; 6862 with AF versus 9234 without AF) were included. There were no statistically significant differences for modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 2 (pooled odds ratio [OR], 1.14 [95% CI, 0.95-1.37]; [95% prediction interval [PI], 0.72-1.80]), mortality (OR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.79-1.08]; [95% PI, 0.77-1.11]), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (OR, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.71-1.32]; [95% PI, 0.43-2.17]), and any intracranial hemorrhage (OR, 1.08 [95% CI, 0.91-1.28]; [95% PI, 0.74-1.58]) among patients with AIS with and without AF. This meta-analysis detected no significant differences in 90-day functional outcomes, mortality, and intracerebral hemorrhage risk after endovascular thrombectomy in patients with AIS with and without AF. URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero; Unique identifier: CRD 42021293511.

Endovascular therapy beyond 24 hours for anterior circulation large vessel occlusion or stenosis in acute ischemic stroke: a retrospective study.

To assess the clinical and safety outcomes of endovascular treatment (EVT) administered more than 24 h after the onset of symptoms in patients with acute ischemic stroke resulting from anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion or stenosis (AIS-ACLVO/S). We enrolled consecutive AIS-ACLVO/S patients who received EVT in our hospital between January 2019 and February 2022 and divided them into two groups based on the time from AIS onset to EVT: EVT < 24 h group and EVT >24 h group. The successful reperfusion (modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction, [mTICI] ≥2b), 90-day modified Rankin Scale score (mRS), intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and symptomatic ICH (sICH), as well as mortality, were analyzed in the two groups of patients. A total of 239 patients were included in the study, with 214 patients in the EVT < 24 h group (67.8 ± 0.8 years, 126 males) and 25 patients in the EVT > 24 h group (62.80 ± 2.0 years, 22 males). Both groups were similar in terms of hypertension, diabetes history, responsible vessels, and Alberta stroke program early computed tomography scores (p > 0.05). However, the EVT < 24 h group had significantly higher age, history of atrial fibrillation, proportion of patients receiving intravenous thrombolysis, and NIHSS scores before EVT than the EVT > 24 h group. AIS etiology differed between the groups, with more cases of large artery atherosclerosis in the EVT > 24-h group and more cases of cardioembolism in the EVT < 24-h group. Successful reperfusion (mTICI ≥2b), ICH, and sICH were similar between the groups. The 90-day functional independence rate (mRS ≤ 2) was significantly higher in the EVT > 24-h than in the EVT < 24-h group (80% vs. 39.7%, p < 0.001), while the 90-day mortality rate was lower in the EVT > 24-h group (0% vs. 24.8%, p < 0.001). In our study, we found that EVT beyond 24 h of symptom onset in patients selected with multimodal MR screening, was associated with high functional independence rates and low mortality. Larger or randomized studies are needed to confirm these findings.

General anesthesia versus nongeneral anesthesia during endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

This study compares the safety and efficacy of general anesthesia (GA) and nongeneral anesthesia (non-GA) on functional outcomes in patients receiving endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke. All available studies on the anesthetic management of patients with acute ischemic stroke in PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Embase were included. We also compared the clinical outcomes in the studies with subgroup analyses of the occlusion site (anterior vs. posterior circulation) and preretriever group versus retriever group. Functional independence, mortality, successful recanalization, hemodynamic instability, intracerebral hemorrhage, and respiratory complications were considered primary or secondary outcomes. A total of 24,606 patients in 60 studies were included. GA had a lower risk of 90-day functional independence (OR=0.67, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.77), higher risk of 90-day mortality (OR=1.29; 95% CI 1.15 to 1.45), and successful reperfusion (OR=1.18; 95% CI 1.94 to 6.82). However, there were no differences in functional independence and mortality between GA and non-GA at 90 days after the procedure. The study shows poorer results in the GA group, which may be due to the inclusion of nonrandomized studies. However, analysis of the RCTs suggested that the outcomes do not differ between the two groups (GA vs. non-GA). Thus, general anesthesia is as safe as nongeneral anesthesia under standardized management.

Does Endovascular Thrombectomy(ET) plus tirofiban benefit stroke patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundIschemic stroke is the second leading cause of death worldwide. Endovascular thrombectomy (ET) has been shown to prevent disability in a proportion of patients. The use of tirofiban in patients undergoing ET after acute stroke has resulted in improved patient function and reduced mortality to some extent. In this systematic review and meta-analysis of the current period, an overview of the most recent studies on the potential efficacy of using tirofiban to help acute stroke patients improve function and reduce mortality was provided. MethodsIn this meta-analysis, we explore the safety and efficacy of ET combined with tirofiban in patients with acute stroke. We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library database from the construction of the library to the present relevant RCTs/non-RCTs. The following key words were used for finding relevant studies from the databases“tirofiban”“thrombectomy”“ Stroke”“ balloon angioplasty”“stenting”. ResultsTotal of 14 trials with 4366 individuals enrolled were included in the Meta-analysis including 2732(62.6) who received ET alone and 1634(37.4 %) who received tirofiban plus ET. The primary outcome of 90-day functional independence (modified Rankin scale (mRS) score≤2) was 42.2 % (1043/2473) in the ET alone group vs. 46.2 % (684/1480) in the tirofiban with ET group (risk ratio (RR), 1.10 [95 % CI, 1.02-1.18]; P=0.02),mortality at 90 days (RR, 0.86 [95 % CI, 0.76–0.98]; P = 0.02). There is no significant between-group differences were found in excellent outcome (mRS score ≤1) (RR, 1.08 [95 % CI, 0.95–1.23]; P = 0.22), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (RR, 1.11 [95 % CI, 0.92–1.34]; P = 0.27). ConclusionsThese findings suggest that the use of ET combined with tirofiban in patients with acute stroke is safe and has the potential to reduce mortality and improve functional independence at 90 days.