8th American Joint Committee On Cancer Staging Research Articles

Abstract PO5-27-01: Comparison between the 7th and the 8th edition of TNM Staging System of American joint committee on Cancer(AJCC) for Breast Cancer Patients, diagnosed and treated at King Abdulaziz Medical City

Abstract Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease with different biological and molecular characteristics that affect local recurrence, metastases, prognoses, and response to available therapies. The 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for breast cancer has incorporated the biological and molecular characteristics, tumor grade, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor status(Her-2)and tumor grade, into the traditional anatomical 7th edition that only considers tumor size, lymph nodes status, and distant metastases. The aim of this study is to compare the 7th to 8th editions of the AJCC staging system for prognostic impact, assess the effect of the new edition on the treatment and treatment outcome Method A retrospective cohort study was performed for all breast cancer patients, diagnosed between (2013 -2019) and underwent upfront surgery at King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC).Patients’ clinicopathological, immunohistochemical, surgical, therapeutic, and follow-up data were retrieved. Overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Univariate analysis using Fisher's exact test was used to compare staging systems' prognostic accuracy. Multivariable analysis using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed to identify factors independently associated with disease outcome Results A total of 169 female patients were included, the 8th AJCC staging system resulted in a reallocation of 108 (63.9%) of the patients to a different stage group. The majority were downstaged(60.9%) while only 3% were upstaged, most of the upstaged patients had a triple-negative subtype (80%). The change in overall stage for the 8th edition was most significant in stage I (an increase by 140.3%), followed by stage II (downstaged by 74.3%) and stage III (downstaged by 49.7%) compared to the 7th edition. Critically 42.8% of all downstaged patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy were found to have received unnecessary chemotherapy after applying the 8th AJCC staging system as per National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) clinical practice guidelines recommendations. The 8th AJCC staging system was a better prognostic predictor of disease survival, patients in 8th AJCC stage 3 had a higher tendency to develop metastases and die because of their disease (P-value 0.03, 0.051, respectively). Conclusions: Our comparison revealed that the AJCC 8th edition staging system is superior and more comprehensive than the 7th, in term of prognostic value, and in defining the precise adjuvant therapy Figure 1 Comparison of the 7th AJCC and the 8th AJCC staging system Citation Format: Nafisa Abdelhafiez, Abdulmohsen Alkushi, Lolwah Alriyees, Mohammad Arabi, Faris Alsalamah, Emad Masuadi, Ahmad Omair, Mohammad Alkaiyat, Hussam Shehata. Comparison between the 7th and the 8th edition of TNM Staging System of American joint committee on Cancer(AJCC) for Breast Cancer Patients, diagnosed and treated at King Abdulaziz Medical City [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO5-27-01.

Utilizing the AJCC 8th Staging to Discriminate Survival Outcomes in HPV-associated Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging 8th edition introduced major changes in the TNM staging of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) based on the human papillomavirus (HPV) status. This study aimed to observe how well the AJCC staging 8th edition precisely discriminates survival outcomes in patients with HPV-associated OPSCC using a large population database. Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database between 2010 and 2016, 7,448 patients with HPV-associated OPSCC were enrolled. Patients diagnosed with OPSCC and tested positive for HPV with information on the TNM staging according to the AJCC staging 7th edition were selected. Next, T-, N-, and clinical staging were reconstructed based on the AJCC staging 8th edition. Survival probabilities in both AJCC staging 7th and 8th editions were estimated and compared. Most patients (93.44%) were down-staged from the 7th to the 8th edition. The AJCC staging 8th edition showed more discriminatory power in predicting survival of patients with HPV-associated OPSCC than the AJCC staging 7th edition, regardless of the primary subsites. Additionally, clinical stage I patients with HPV-associated OPSCC according to the AJCC 8th edition showed better prognosis in case of high T staging than high N staging. Clinical staging according to the AJCC 8th edition compared to that of the 7th edition was an independent prognostic factor in patients with HPV-associated OPSCC. This study emphasizes the advantages of the new classification system for discriminating survival in HPV-associated OPSCC according to various factors.

Clinical outcome of surgical resection for multifocal T2-T3 hepatocellular carcinoma up to 3 nodules: a comparative analysis with a single nodule.

Although the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system seems to underestimate the impact of curative-intent surgical resection for multifocal hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), recent studies have indicated favorable results for the surgical resection of multiple HCC. This study aimed to assess clinical outcomes and feasibility of surgical resection for multifocal HCC with up to three nodules compared with single tumor cases. Patients who underwent surgical resection for HCC with up to three nodules between 2009 and 2020 were included, and those with the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition, T1 and T4 stages were excluded to reduce differences in disease distribution and severity. Finally, 81 and 52 patients were included in the single and multiple treatment groups, respectively. Short- and long-term outcomes including recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS), were evaluated. All patients were classified as Child-Pugh class A. RFS and OS were not significantly different between the two groups (P=0.176 and P=0.966, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that transfusion and intrahepatic metastasis were significantly associated with recurrence (P=0.046 and P=0.005, respectively). Additionally, intrahepatic metastasis was significantly associated with OS (hazard ratio, 1.989; 95% confidence interval, 1.040-3.802; P=0.038). Since there was no significant difference in survival between the single and multiple groups among patients with AJCC 8th stage T2 and T3, surgical resection with curative intent could be considered with acceptable long-term survival for selected patients with multiple HCC of up to three nodules.

Prediction of postoperative recurrence in resectable pancreatic body/tail adenocarcinoma: a novel risk stratification approach using a CT-based nomogram.

To identify prognostic CT features that predict recurrence in patients with resectable pancreatic body/tail adenocarcinoma (PBTA) and construct a CT-based nomogram for preoperative risk stratification. A total of 258 patients with resectable PBTA who underwent upfront surgery were retrospectively enrolled (development cohort, n = 172; validation cohort, n = 86), and their clinical and CT features were analyzed. Stepwise Cox proportional hazard analysis was performed to identify prognostic features and construct a predictive nomogram for recurrence-free survival (RFS). The prognostic performance of the CT-based nomogram was validated and compared to the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) pathological staging system. In the development cohort, the following five CT features for predicting recurrence were identified to construct the nomogram: tumor density in the venous phase, tumor necrosis, adjacent organ invasion, splenic vein invasion, and superior mesenteric vein/portal vein abutment. In the validation cohort, the CT-based nomogram showed a concordance index of 0.65 (95% confidence interval: 0.58-0.73), which was higher than the 8th AJCC staging system. The area under the curves of the nomogram for predicting recurrence at 0.5, 1, and 2years were 0.66, 0.71, and 0.72, respectively. Patients were categorized into high- and low-risk groups with 1-year recurrence probabilities of 0.73 and 0.43, respectively. The proposed nomogram provided accurate recurrence risk stratification for patients with resectable PBTA in a preoperative setting and may be used to facilitate clinical decision-making. The proposed CT-based nomogram, based on easily available CT features, may serve as an effective and convenient tool for stratifying further the recurrence risk of patients with pancreatic body/tail adenocarcinoma. • The CT-based nomogram, incorporating five commonly used CT features, successfully preoperatively stratified patients with resectable PBTA into distinct prognosis groups. • Tumor density in the venous phase, tumor necrosis, splenic vein invasion, adjacent organ invasion, and superior mesenteric vein/portal vein abutment were associated with RFS in patients with resectable PBTA. • The CT-based nomogram exhibited better predictive performance for recurrence than the 8th AJCC staging system.

The prognostic value of 11th Japanese classification and 8th AJCC staging systems in Chinese patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BackgroundTwo staging systems, the 8th staging system by the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) and the 11th Japanese classification by Japan Esophageal Society (JES), are currently applied in the clinic for predicting the prognosis of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The differences between the two staging systems have been widely researched. However, little studies focus on the differences in specific staging between the two systems. Therefore, we aimed to compare the performance of different staging in predicting overall survival (OS) of Chinese patients with ESCC.MethodsThis retrospective study included 268 patients who underwent radical esophagectomy and mediastinal lymph node dissection for ESCC between January 2008 and December 2013. Patients were staged by the 8th AJCC and 11th JES staging systems. OS was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared between N stages and between stage groupings using the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed to identify factors independently related to outcome. Further, we compared the concordance indexes (C-indexes) of the two staging systems.ResultsThe mean age was 61.25 ± 7.056 years, median follow-up was 44.82 months, and 5-year OS rate was 47%. The OS was well predicted by the 8th AJCC N staging (P < 0.001) and the 11th JES N staging (P < 0.001), with a c-index of 0.638 (95% CI: 0.592–0.683) for AJCC N staging and 0.627 (95% CI: 0.583–0.670) for JES N staging (P = 0.13). In addition, the OS was also well predicted by stage groupings of the 8th AJCC (P < 0.001) and the 11th JES systems (P < 0.001), with a c-index of 0.658 (95% CI: 0.616–0.699) for 8th AJCC stage grouping and 0.629 (95% CI: 0.589–0.668) for the11th JES stage grouping (P = 0.211).ConclusionsThe prognostic effect of 11th JES staging system is comparable with that of AJCC 8th staging system for patients with ESCC. Therefore, both systems are applicable to clinical practice.

The Prognostic Significance of Nomogram-Based Pretreatment Inflammatory Indicators in Patients With Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Receiving Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy.

At present, there is no objective prognostic index available for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who underwent intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). This study is to develop a nomogram based on hematologic inflammatory indices for ESCC patients treated with IMRT. 581 patients with ESCC receiving definitive IMRT were enrolled in our retrospective study. Of which, 434 patients with treatment-naïve ESCC in Fujian Cancer Hospital were defined as the training cohort. Additional 147 newly diagnosed ESCC patients were used as the validation cohort. Independent predictors of overall survival (OS) were employed to establish a nomogram model. The predictive ability was evaluated by time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves, the concordance index (C-index), net reclassification index (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI). Decision curve analysis (DCA) was performed to assess the clinical benefits of the nomogram model. The entire series was divided into 3 risk subgroups stratified by the total nomogram scores. Clinical TNM staging, primary gross tumor volume, chemotherapy, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet lymphocyte ratio were independent predictors of OS. Nomogram was developed incorporating these factors. Compared with the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging, the C-index for 5-year OS (.627 and .629) and the AUC value of 5-year OS (.706 and .719) in the training and validation cohorts (respectively) were superior. Furthermore, the nomogram model presented higher NRI and IDI. DCA also demonstrated that the nomogram model provided greater clinical benefit. Finally, patients with <84.8, 84.8-151.4, and >151.4 points were categorized into low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk groups. Their 5-year OS rates were 44.0%, 23.6%, and 8.9%, respectively. The C-index was .625, which was higher than the 8th AJCC staging. We have developed a nomogram model that enables risk-stratification of patients with ESCC receiving definitive IMRT. Our findings may serve as a reference for personalized treatment.

Modified the 8th AJCC staging system for patients with advanced prostate cancer: a study based on SEER database

BackgroundThe American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th staging system of prostate cancer may be insufficient in predicting the prognosis of some staged patients. This study aimed to modify the AJCC 8th staging system in patients with advanced prostate cancer.MethodsData of patients with advanced prostate cancer from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2004 and 2016 were enrolled in this cohort study. All patients were divided into the training set and the testing set with a ratio of 6:4. Multivariate Cox survival model was utilized to obtain the nomogram score for each stage variable. The modified staging system was based on the total nomogram score. The C-index and Kaplan-Meier (K-M) curves were used to show the prognostic prediction effect of patients with different staging systems.ResultsA total of 28,006 patients were included for analysis. T stage, N stage, M stage, primary Gleason pattern score, secondary Gleason pattern score, and PSA level were included as stage variables. Patients with AJCC stage III C [hazard ratio (HR) = 4.17, 95% confidence interval (CI), 3.39–5.13] and AJCC stage IV B (HR = 3.19, 95%CI, 1.79–5.69) were associated with worse prognosis compared with those of AJCC stage III B, while no statistical significance was found in patients with stage IV A (P > 0.05). In terms of the modified staging system, patients with modified stage III C (HR = 2.06, 95%CI, 1.46–2.92), modified stage IV A (HR = 6.91, 95%CI, 4.81–9.94), and modified stage IV B (HR = 21.89, 95%CI, 14.76–32.46) were associated with a poorer prognosis compared with patients with modified stage III B. The prognostic ability (C-index) of the modified staging system (0.789; 95%CI, 0.777–0.801) was better than that of the AJCC 8th edition system (0.762; 95%CI, 0.748–0.776) (0.789 vs. 0.762, P = 0.004). The K-M curves indicated that the modified staging system may be distinguished prognostic differences in patients with different stages.ConclusionModified staging system may be better than AJCC 8th staging system for predicting prognosis in prostate cancer patients. The AJCC 8th staging system should be further optimized.

Development and verification of a nomogram for predicting the prognosis of resectable gastric cancer with outlet obstruction

BackgroundThe prognosis of patients with gastric cancer (GC) with gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) after gastrectomy is highly variable. In this study, we aimed to develop a nomogram to predict the prognosis of these patients.Patients and MethodsData from 218 GC patients with GOO who underwent gastrectomy at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center were retrospectively collected as a training cohort. The data of 59 patients with the same diagnosis who underwent gastrectomy at the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University were collected as an external verification cohort. A nomogram for the overall survival (OS) was developed using the Cox regression model in the training cohort, which was validated in a verification cohort.ResultsMultivariate analysis showed that the surgical procedure (P < 0.001), period of chemotherapy (P < 0.001), T stage (P = 0.006), N stage (P = 0.040), systemic immune-inflammatory index (SII) (P < 0.001), and fibrinogen level (P = 0.026) were independent factors affecting OS. The nomogram constructed on the aforementioned factors for predicting the 1- and 3-year OS achieved a Harrell’s concordance index (C-index) of 0.756 and 0.763 for the training and verification cohorts, respectively. Compared with the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Tumour-Node-Metastasis (TNM) staging system, the nomogram had higher C-index values and areas under the curve (AUCs) and slightly higher net clinical benefit.ConclusionCompared to the 8th AJCC staging system, the newly developed nomogram showed superior performance in predicting the survival of GC patients with GOO after gastrectomy.

Prognostic Significance of Growth Pattern in Predicting Outcome of Opisthorchis viverrini-Associated Distal Cholangiocarcinoma in Thailand

Distal cholangiocarcinoma (dCCA) is a rare type of CCA in Asia, even in Opisthorchis viverrini-prevalent Northeastern Thailand. The clinical ambiguity and imprecision of diagnosis surrounding this malignancy result in high mortality due often to advanced/metastatic disease on presentation. We aim to identify a prognostic factor that can improve the performance stratification and influence the outcome of dCCA patients after curative resection. A total of 79 patients who underwent curative-intended surgery for dCCA was enrolled. Possible risk factors for survival were analyzed with log-rank test, and independent factors with Cox regression model. dCCA patients were staged and classified according to the 8th edition the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Staging Manual. Results were then compared with the revised classification employing the prognostic factor identified from multivariate analysis. Multivariate analysis revealed that growth pattern (p < 0.01) and distant metastasis (p = 0.012) were independent factors. Growth patterns comprise intraductal (ID), periductal infiltrating (PI), mass-forming (MF), and mixed types. When dCCA patients were grouped into those having good and poor outcomes (with and without ID components, respectively). The survival outcomes significantly differed among patients with and without ID components, which was better than with the 8th AJCC staging system in our cohort. Furthermore, Chi-square test showed that patterns without ID components (PI, MF, PI + MF) correlated with lymph node and distant metastasis. Therefore, classification of dCCA patients after curative-intended surgical resection based on growth pattern provides additional beneficial information for the prediction of survival in dCCA patients.

Prognostic nomogram for predicting cancer-specific survival in patients with resected hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a large cohort study.

The aim of the study was to establish and validate a novel prognostic nomogram of cancer-specific survival (CSS) in resected hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA) patients. A training cohort of 536 patients and an internal validation cohort of 270 patients were included in this study. The demographic and clinicopathological variables were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis were performed in the training cohort, followed by the construction of nomogram for CSS. The performance of the nomogram was assessed by concordance index (C-index) and calibration plots and compared with the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging systems. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was applied to measure the predictive power and clinical value of the nomogram. The nomogram incorporating age, tumor size, tumor grade, lymph node ratio (LNR) and T stage parameters was with a C-index of 0.655 in the training cohort, 0.626 in the validation cohort, compared with corresponding 0.631, 0.626 for the AJCC 8th staging system. The calibration curves exhibited excellent agreement between CSS probabilities predicted by nomogram and actual observation in the training cohort and validation cohort. DCA indicated that this nomogram generated substantial clinical value. The proposed nomogram provided a more accurate prognostic prediction of CSS for individual patients with resected HCCA than the AJCC 8th staging system, which might be served as an effective tool to stratify resected HCCA patients with high risk and facilitate optimizing therapeutic benefit.

Development and Validation of a Nomogram for Predicting Overall Survival in Patients with Second Primary Small Cell Lung Cancer After Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A SEER-Based Study

BackgroundNon-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) survivors are at an increased risk of developing second primary malignancies, such as small cell lung cancer. This paper sought to establish a prognostic nomogram to assess overall survival (OS) in patients with second primary small cell lung cancer (SPSCLC) after NSCLC.Methods420 patients who developed SPSCLC after NSCLC were randomly split into the training and validation groups. A nomogram was established by stepwise regression. Area under the curve (AUC) and calibration plots were applied to assess the prognostic performance of the nomogram. Concordance index (C-index), integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), net reclassification index (NRI) and decision curve analysis (DCA) were performed to compare the nomogram with the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th staging system. Survival risk classification was constructed based on the nomogram.ResultsFive variables were chosen to construct the nomogram. The AUC showed that it had a satisfactory discrimination ability. All calibration plots displayed good concordance between nomogram and observation. The C-index, IDI, NRI and DCA showed the nomogram was superior to the AJCC 8th staging system. The Kaplan-Meier curves suggested huge differences in prognosis among the three risk groups.ConclusionThis study build a nomogram and risk stratification system for predicting probabilities of OS in patients with SPSCLC after NSCLC, which can help clinicians in individualized survival assessment and treatment decisions.

Validation of the Eighth Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM Staging System in Patients with Resected Ampullary Adenocarcinoma

Introduction: The purpose of this study is to assess the prognostic accuracy of the 7th and 8th AJCC staging system for ampullary cancer(AAC) and externally validate the 8th edition for resected AAC in an international cohort.

Microscopic Extrathyroidal Extension Results in Increased Rate of Tumor Recurrence and Is an Independent Predictor of Patient's Outcome in Middle Eastern Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma.

BackgroundPapillary Thyroid Cancer (PTC) is the most common endocrine malignancy, with recurrence rate as high as 30%. A great deal of controversy surrounds the significance of microscopic extrathyroidal extension (m-ETE) as a prognostic factor. The most recent edition (8th) of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system has removed m-ETE from the definition of pT3, which suggests that m-ETE may lack prognostic impact in PTC patients. Moreover, data about m-ETE prevalence and clinical impact on Middle Eastern PTC remains unknown. We therefore investigate the prevalence of m-ETE and its clinico-pathological correlation and prognostic impact in Middle Eastern PTC. We also compared the AJCC 7th and 8th staging systems and their prognostic performance.MethodsPTCs from 1430 consecutive adult (> 18 years) patients from single tertiary care hospital were included in this study. A retrospective analysis of PTC patients’ survival and recurrence were compared between AJCC 8th and AJCC 7th staging systems using Proportion of Variation Explained (PVE) and Harrell’s C-index.ResultsMedian follow up of the study cohort was 9.3 years. 31.2% (446/1430) of patients had m-ETE. In the overall cohort, m-ETE was associated with multiple adverse features such as older age (p < 0.0001), male sex (p = 0.0245), tall cell variant (p < 0.0001), bilateral tumors (p < 0.0001), multifocality (p < 0.0001), lymphovascular invasion (p < 0.0001), lymph node metastasis (p < 0.0001), distant metastasis (p = 0.0166), tumor recurrence (p < 0.0001), radioactive iodine refractoriness (p < 0.0001), BRAF mutation (p < 0.0001) and reduced recurrence-free survival (RFS; HR = 1.75; 95% CI = 1.30 – 2.35; p < 0.0001) irrespective of tumor size. Of the 611 patients with T3 disease based on AJCC 7th edition, 359 (58.8%) were down-staged in AJCC 8th edition classification. Overall, the prognostic performance of AJCC 8th edition was inferior to AJCC 7th on the basis of lower PVE (3.04% vs. 3.73%) and lower C-index (0.40 vs. 0.48).ConclusionsIn Middle Eastern PTC, m-ETE is significantly associated with compromised survival and acts as an independent predictor of RFS. Given these findings, m-ETE should be included in the thyroid cancer treatment guidelines.

Development and External Validation of Survival Prediction Model for Pancreatic Cancer Using Two Nationwide Databases: Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) and Korea Tumor Registry System-Biliary Pancreas (KOTUS-BP).

Background/AimsSeveral prediction models for evaluating the prognosis of nonmetastatic resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) have been developed, and their performances were reported to be superior to that of the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system. We developed a prediction model to evaluate the prognosis of resected PDAC and externally validated it with data from a nationwide Korean database.MethodsData from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database were utilized for model development, and data from the Korea Tumor Registry System-Biliary Pancreas (KOTUS-BP) database were used for external validation. Potential candidate variables for model development were age, sex, histologic differentiation, tumor location, adjuvant chemotherapy, and the AJCC 8th staging system T and N stages. For external validation, the concordance index (C-index) and time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were evaluated.ResultsBetween 2004 and 2016, data from 9,624 patients were utilized for model development, and data from 3,282 patients were used for external validation. In the multivariate Cox proportional hazard model, age, sex, tumor location, T and N stages, histologic differentiation, and adjuvant chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors for resected PDAC. After an exhaustive search and 10-fold cross validation, the best model was finally developed, which included all prognostic variables. The C-index, 1-year, 2-year, 3-year, and 5-year time-dependent AUCs were 0.628, 0.650, 0.665, 0.675, and 0.686, respectively.ConclusionsThe survival prediction model for resected PDAC could provide quantitative survival probabilities with reliable performance. External validation studies with other nationwide databases are needed to evaluate the performance of this model.

Proposal of a new T-stage classification system for ampullary carcinoma based on Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Result (SEER) database

BackgroundTumor size is still considered a useful prognostic factor in currently available tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classification staging systems for most solid tumors, but the significance of tumor size on the prognosis of ampullary carcinoma remains controversial. The aim of the current study was to propose a new T-stage classification system for ampullary carcinoma to address the impact of tumor size on the prognostic outcome. MethodsUsing the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, we identified 1080 patients with ampullary carcinoma who underwent radical surgical resection between 2004 and 2015. Based on the results obtained from analysis of various clinicopathologic factors, a new T-stage classification system was proposed. ResultsAmong the 1080 patients, 618 were men and 462 were women, with a median tumor size of 2.3 (range 0.1–12) cm. Using the 7th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging manual, we noticed significant differences in overall survival (OS) between T2 vs. T3 tumors (P < 0.001) and T3 vs. T4 tumors (P = 0.002), but failed to observe significant differences between T1 vs. T2 tumors (P = 0.498) in our pair-wise comparison. Using the newly developed T-stage classification system, we were able to differentiate significant differences in OS between T1 vs. T2 tumors (P = 0.032), T2 vs. T3 tumors (P < 0.001) and T3 vs. T4 tumor (P = 0.003) in all pair-wise comparisons. The c-index of the new staging system was 0.653 (95% CI: 0.629–0.677), showing a better discriminatory power than the 0.636 of the 7th AJCC staging system (95% CI: 0.612–0.660). ConclusionsThe new T-stage classification system described herein can better differentiate prognostic outcomes after radical resection in patients with ampullary carcinoma by incorporating tumor size and depth of tumor infiltration.

Triple-negative breast cancer outcomes: Does AJCC 8th staging improve chemotherapy decision-making

PurposeTo investigate the effect of the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) pathological prognostic staging on chemotherapy decision-making for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients with T1-2N0M0 disease. MethodsPatients diagnosed with T1-2N0M0 TNBC were retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program. Statistical methods including Kaplan-Meier survival curve, receiver operating characteristics curve, and Cox proportional hazard model. ResultsWe identified 12,156 patients, including 9371 (77.1%) patients who received chemotherapy. Overall, 57.4% of patients (n = 6975) were upstaged after being reassigned by the 8th AJCC staging. However, the 8th staging of AJCC did not have a greater prognostic value compared to the 7th staging (P = 0.064). The receipt of chemotherapy significantly improved the breast cancer-specific survival for stage T1c and T2 tumors (P < 0.001), but not for stage T1a (P = 0.188) and T1b (P = 0.376) tumors. Using AJCC 8th staging, chemotherapy benefit was only found in stage IIA patients (P = 0.002), but not for stage IA (P = 0.653) and IB (P = 0.492) patients. There were 9564 patients with stage T1c and T2 diseases and 4979 patients with 8th AJCC stage IIA disease. Therefore, approximately half of patients (47.9%, n = 4585) may be safe to omit chemotherapy using the AJCC 8th staging compared to the current chemotherapy recommendation for T1-2N0M0 TNBC. ConclusionThe 8th AJCC staging system did not demonstrate the superior discriminatory ability of prognostic stratification than the 7th AJCC staging system in T1-2N0M0 TNBC. However, this new AJCC staging could more accurately predict the chemotherapy benefit, thereby enabling more patients to avoid unnecessary chemotherapy.

Comparison of Two Major Staging Systems in Predicting Survival and Recommendation of Postoperative Radiotherapy Based on the 11th Japanese Classification for Esophageal Carcinoma After Curative Resection: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

The aim of this study was to compare the prognostic predictive power of the 11th Japan Esophageal Society (JES) staging system with the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system in patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (TESCC), and to estimate the survival benefits of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) based on a substage of the JES staging system. Area under the curve (AUC) values of the receiver operating characteristic curve were calculated to evaluate prognostic efficacy. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was conducted to balance the two groups (surgery only [S group] or surgery plus PORT [S+RT group]) across substages of the 11th JES staging system according to independent prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) identified using Cox proportional hazards regression. A total of 2960 patients were eligible. The 5-year OS AUC for the 8th AJCC staging system was significantly higher than that for the 11th JES staging system (0.701 vs. 0.675, p<0.001). Before PSM, PORT significantly improved 5-year OS rates for patients in stage III and IVA by 9.1% (p<0.001) and 21.1% (p<0.001), respectively. After PSM, the 5-year OS rates in stage II, III, and IVA of the S+RT group were significantly higher than those in the S group (70.9%, 39.7%, and 35.1% vs. 57.8%, 27.2%, and 10.3%, respectively; p<0.001). The 11th JES staging system was less capable of predicting prognosis than the 8th AJCC staging system and patients in stage III of the JES staging system were highly recommended to undergo PORT.

Proposed modification of the eighth edition of the AJCC staging system for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

BackgroundTo improve the prognostic accuracy of the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) with establishment and validation of a modified TNM (mTNM) staging system. MethodsData on patients who underwent curative-intent resection for ICC was collected from 15 high-volume centers worldwide (n = 643). An external validation dataset was obtained from the SEER registry (n = 797). The mTNM staging system was proposed by redefining T categories, and incorporating the recently proposed N status as N0 (no lymph node metastasis [LNM]), N1 (1–2 LNM) and N2 (≥3 LNM). ResultsThe 8th AJCC TNM staging system failed to stratify overall survival (OS) of stage II versus IIIA, stage IIIB versus IV, as well as overall stage III versus IV among all patients from the two databases, as well as stage I versus II, and stage III versus III among patients who had ≥6 LNs examined. There was a monotonic decrement in survival based on the proposed mTNM staging classification among patients derived from both the multi-institutional (Median OS, stage I 69.8 vs. II 37.1 vs. III 18.9 vs. IV 16.4 months, all p < 0.05), and SEER (Median OS, stage I 87.0 vs. II 29.3 vs. III 17.7 vs. IV 14.2 months, all p < 0.05) datasets, which was also verified among patients who had ≥6 lymph node harvested from both databases. ConclusionThe modified TNM staging system for ICC using the new T and N definitions provided an improved means to stratify patients relative to long-term OS versus the 8th AJCC staging.

Original study: The rescue staging for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with inadequate examined lymph nodes

BackgroundIn previous studies, it’s recommended that the lymph node involvement should be evaluated with enough examined lymph nodes (eLNs) in the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for pancreatic cancer. This study aims to put forward a rescue staging system for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients with inadequate eLNs after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). Method11,224 PDAC patients undergoing PD in The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were included. Another Ruijin Pancreatic Disease Center (RJPDC) database consisted of 821 patients was utilized for external validation. ResultsThe proportions of patients with eLNs≥15 were 44.7% and 32.8% in SEER and RJPDC database separately. The rescue staging system was put forward relying on LNR (HR = 1.83, 95% CI 1.74–1.92, P < 0.001) for N staging of eLNs<15 population and pLNs for the rest. The TNM modalities were also rearranged in the rescue system for better survival coordination. The C-index of rescue staging system was 0.638 while that of AJCC 8th staging system was 0.613 in SEER database. Similar phenomena were observed in RJPDC database. Kaplan-Meier analyses revealed reliable internal coherences (SEER: Ib: P = 0.26; IIa: P = 0.063; IIb: P = 0.53; IIIa: P = 0.11. RJPDC: Ib: P = 0.32; IIa: P = 0.66; IIb: P = 0.76; IIIa: P = 0.66) and significant staging efficiency (SEER: P < 0.001; RJPDC: P = 0.002). ConclusionA rescue staging system was put forward regardless of the eLNs number. And the novel system manifested better predictive capacity than 8th AJCC staging system.

The prognostic and predictive value of the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system among early breast cancer patients aged

This study respectively analyzed the prognostic value and the role in treatment decision-making [breast-conserving surgery (BCS) + radiotherapy (RT) or mastectomy (MAST)] of the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) pathological prognostic staging system compared with the 7th AJCC anatomical staging system among early breast cancer patients aged <50 years. Patients with T1-2N0M0 breast cancer aged <50 years were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database between 2010 and 2014. Breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) was used as the primary endpoint. Chi-squared test, receiver operating characteristics analysis, Kaplan-Meier method, and multivariate Cox proportional models were used to conduct statistical analysis. A total of 22,640 female patients were identified, and 24.4% of them reallocated to new stage groups from the 7th to the 8th AJCC staging. Among them, 46.2% (n=10,450) and 53.8% (n=12,190) of patients received BCS + RT and MAST, respectively. The 8th AJCC staging system was an independent prognostic factor for BCSS. Patients treated with BCS + RT had better BCSS compared to those treated with MAST (P<0.001). According to the 8th AJCC staging, BCS + RT could improve 5-year BCSS compared with MAST in patients with stage IA (P=0.006) and stage IB (P=0.001) diseases, while comparable BCSS was found between the two treatment arms in patients' stage IIA disease (P=0.366). Multivariate analyses replicated similar findings after stratification by the 8th AJCC stages. In patients with T1-2N0 breast cancer and aged <50 years, the 8th AJCC pathological staging system provides accurate prognostic information than the 7th anatomical staging. BCS + RT is the optimal local management for stage IA and IB diseases, while it is the optional management in stage IIA disease according to the 8th AJCC staging.