AIM OF THE STUDY. Comparative clinical analysis of the efficacy of terlipressin and octreotide as additional drug therapy to mechanical hemostasis with nitinol stent in patients with liver cirrhosis complicated by bleeding from esophageal varices refractory to endoscopic treatment.MATERIAL AND METHODS. Thirty-one patients with liver cirrhosis complicated by esophageal variceal bleeding refractory to endoscopic treatment , in whose complex treatment program, as a first-line lifesaving measure, hemostasis with a self-expanding hemostasis was performed nitinol stent were randomly assigned to two groups. In group A, 20 patients were treated with terlipressin as an adjuvant to mechanical hemostasis, and in group B, 11 patients were treated with octreotide. Unpaired Student’s t-test was used for statistical analysis of the results. Graphs for assessing the survival function of patients for 8 weeks after the end of treatment were constructed using the Kaplan-Meier method.RESULTS. In the acute observation period terlipressin and octreotide were equally effective in treating refractory variceal bleeding. In the subacute observation period, the administration of octreotide was generally accompanied by a greater number of side effects (54.5%) than terlipressin (30.0%) (p=0.453). In the remote observation period, 8-week survival in the group of patients receiving terlipressin was higher than in the group of patients receiving octreotide.CONCLUSION. Terlipressin is as effective as octreotide as an adjunct to endoscopic stenting in drug therapy for liver cirrhosis complicated by esophageal variceal bleeding refractory to endoscopic treatment. At the same time, terlipressin has a greater effect than octreotide on reducing 8-week mortality, which approaches statistical significance. In this regard, terlipressin may be the vasoactive drug of choice in acute refractory variceal bleeding.