3-month Formulation Research Articles

A Phase3, Open-Label, Single-Arm Trial of the Efficacy and Safety of Triptorelin 6-Month Formulation in Chinese Children with Central Precocious Puberty.

This phase3 study assessed the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of the 6-month prolonged release (PR) formulation in Chinese children with central precocious puberty (CPP). In this open-label study (NCT05029622), Chinese children (girls < 9years, boys < 10years) received two doses of triptorelin pamoate 22.5mg (day1 and month6). Primary endpoint was the proportion at month6 with luteinizing hormone (LH) suppression (stimulated peak LH ≤ 5IU/L after gonadotropin-releasing hormone stimulation). Secondary endpoints included safety assessments, hormone level changes, and clinical parameters from baseline. Overall, 66 children completed the study (93.9% girls; median age 8.0 [range 5-9] years). At month6, all patients had LH suppression; this was maintained at month12 in 98.5% of patients. Mean basal and peak LH and follicle-stimulating hormone levels were suppressed throughout follow-up. All patients at months3 to 12had sex hormone suppression to prepubertal levels. Stable or reduced breast development was seen for 98.4% and 93.5% of girls at month6 and 12, respectively; all boys had regression or stable genital development until month12. Compared with baseline (9.82cm/year), mean growth velocity was 5.88cm/year at month6 and 5.17cm/year at month12. Mean bone age/chronological age ratio decreased from 1.27 at baseline to 1.23 and 1.21 at month6 and 12, respectively. In girls, 64.5% showed decreased uterine length at month6 and 12 versus baseline, while 75.0% of boys showed stable testicular volume versus baseline. Thirteen patients (19.7%) had 22 drug-related treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs); no grade ≥ 3 TEAEs were reported. The efficacy and safety profile of triptorelin 6-month PR in Chinese children with CPP was consistent with data previously reported in non-Chinese children with CPP, supporting this as a viable treatment option for Chinese children with CPP. Trial registration:ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT05029622.

Evaluation of the criteria for renewal of LHRH agonists in patients with prostate cancer: results of the ANAREN Study.

Injectable extended-release formulations of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists (LHRHa) have simplified the treatment of prostate cancer with a satisfactory level of androgen castration. This study aims to determine the percentage of patients whose initial LHRHa prescription was renewed during follow-up, how many changed formulation and how their quality of life evolved. This is an observational, prospective, multicentre study of men with prostate cancer who were to receive treatment with LHRHa (triptorelin every 3 or 6 months, leuprorelin every 3 or 6 months, or goserelin every 3 months) for 24 months. The treatment used was recorded and quality of life was assessed (QLQ-PR25 questionnaire) at four follow-up visits. A total of 497 men (median age 75 years) were evaluated. The median exposure to LHRHa was 24 months. The initial prescription was renewed in 95.7% at follow-up 1 and 75% at follow-up 4. The main reason for changing from a 6-month to a 3-month formulation was a preference for sequential treatment (according to the investigator) and to see the physician more frequently (according to the patient). The main reason for switching from the 3-month to 6-month formulation was simplification of treatment (according to the investigator) and for convenience (according to the patient). Findings in the QLQ-PR25 questionnaire revealed no changes in urinary or bowel symptoms, though an improvement in sexual activity was reported. Practically all investigators and patients were satisfied/very satisfied with the treatment. Changes in formulation were scarce and generally justified by convenience factors or personal preferences. Patients maintained a good health status, with a high rate of retention of LHRHa treatment. Study number: A-ES-52014-224.A plain language summary is provided as supplementary material (available at: https://www.drugsincontext.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/dic.2024-2-2-Suppl.pdf).

Paliperidone palmitate 6-month formulation for the treatment of schizophrenia: a 14-month follow-up study

IntroductionRelapse prevention is critical because psychopathology and functionality can worsen in patients with schizophrenia because the repeated episodes and we have strong evidence of antipsychotics efficacy for relapse prevention, but nonadherence rates in patients with schizophrenia are very high, even in comparison with other illness.There is extensive clinical trial evidence for the use of paliperidone palmitate 1-month (PP1M) and paliperidone palmitate 3-month (PP3M) formulations for maintaining treatment continuity and preventing relapses and risk of hospitalizations in patients with schizophrenia. (Najarian et al. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2022; 25(3) 238-251). Paliperidone palmitate 6-month (PP6M) formulation is a presentation that provides a dosing interval of once every six months.ObjectivesThe principal aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of the PP6M in patients with non-acute schizophrenia on an outpatient basisMethodsMethods: Sample: 22 patients diagnosed with schizophrenia (DSM 5 criteria) that started treatment with PP6M after being stabilized with PP1M (N:10) or PP3M (N:12) (the treatment dose was not changed in the four months before study inclusion)Bimonthly, the following evaluations were performed during a follow-up period of 14 months:The Clinical Global Impression-Schizophrenia scale (CGI-SCH)Treatment adherence, concomitant medication, adverse events and the number of hospitalizations and emergency visitsEfficacy values: Percentage of patients who remained free of admissions at the end of 14months of follow-up.Other evaluation criteria: Percentage of patients who never visited the emergency department at the end of 14 months of follow-up, average change from baseline visit to the final evaluation as assessed by score obtained on the following scale: GSI-SCH, treatment adherence rate and tolerability.ResultsThe percentage of patients who remained free of admission at the end of the 14 months follow-up was 90% in the total sample, 83% in the PP3M pre-treatment group and 100% in the PP1M pre-treatment group.The percentage of patients who never visited the emergency department at the end of 14 months follow-up was: 81% in the total sample, 75% in the PP3M pre-treatment group and 90% in the PP1M pre-treatment group.At the end of the study, a mean change of +0.12 (±0.11) on the ICG-SCH-SI scale in the total sample, +0.25 (±0.21) in the PP3M pre-treatment group and 0 in the PP1M pre-treatment group.The treatment persistence rate at the 14 month of follow-up was 100% in the total sample.Treatment was well tolerated, and no safety-related adverse events were collected. There were no tolerability-related withdrawals from treatment.ConclusionsIn our study, we found that long-term treatment with paliperidone palmitate 6-month formulation is effective and well tolerated in clinical practice conditions.Disclosure of InterestNone Declared

Relapse Rates With Paliperidone Palmitate in Adult Patients With Schizophrenia: Results for the 6-Month Formulation From an Open-label Extension Study Compared to Real-World Data for the 1-Month and 3-Month Formulations.

The 3 paliperidone palmitate (PP) long-acting injectable antipsychotic formulations, PP 1-month (PP1M), PP 3-month (PP3M), and PP 6-month (PP6M), have shown to reduce the risk of relapse in schizophrenia. The current phase-4 study constructed external comparator arms (ECAs) using real-world data for PP3M and PP1M and compared relapse prevention rates with PP6M from an open-label extension (OLE) study in adult patients with schizophrenia. PP6M data were derived from a single-arm, 24-month, OLE study (NCT04072575), which included patients with schizophrenia who completed a 12-month randomized, double-blind, noninferiority, phase-3 study (NCT03345342) without relapse. Patients in the PP3M and PP1M ECAs were identified from the IBM® MarketScan® Multistate Medicaid Database based on similar eligibility criteria as the PP6M cohort. A total of 178 patients were included in each cohort following propensity score matching. Most patients were men (>70%; mean age: 39-41 years). Time to relapse (primary analysis based on Kaplan-Meier estimates) was significantly delayed in the PP6M cohort (P<.001, log-rank test). The relapse rate was lower in the PP6M cohort (3.9%) vs PP3M (20.2%) and PP1M (29.8%) cohorts. Risk of relapse decreased significantly (P<.001) by 82% for PP6M vs PP3M (HR = 0.18 [95% CI = 0.08 to 0.40]), 89% for PP6M vs PP1M (HR = 0.11 [0.05 to 0.25]), and 35% for PP3M vs PP1M (HR = 0.65 [0.42 to 0.99]; P = .043). Sensitivity analysis confirmed findings from the primary analysis. Although the ECAs were matched to mimic the characteristics of the PP6M cohort, heterogeneity between the groups could exist due to factors including prior study participation, unmeasured confounders, variations in data capture and quality, and completeness of clinical information. In a clinical trial setting, PP6M significantly delayed time to relapse and demonstrated lower relapse rates compared with PP3M and PP1M treatments in real-world settings among adult patients with schizophrenia. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04072575; EudraCT number: 2018-004532-30.

6-month Formulations of Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Advanced Prostate Cancer: Effectiveness and Rationale for Extended Dosing

Background: Luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists and GnRH antagonists are the most widely used androgen deprivation therapy to achieve castration levels of serum testosterone (T). Adherence to dosing schedules is important to avoid treatment failure. A recent analysis found a high non-adherence rate of 84% for LHRH agonist injections based on dosing schedules used in pivotal trials. Method: Narrative review of LHRH therapy and evaluation of which offers optimal efficacy, safety, and practicality. Results: 6-month LHRH agonist formulations require fewer appointments for injections than shorter-acting formulations. Therefore, the frequency of late/missed doses and overall non-adherence may be reduced compared to options requiring frequent dosing (e.g., oral therapies and shorter-acting injections). This flexibility may be preferable for patients who live in multiple locations throughout the year, live long distances from clinics, and/or lack access to reliable transportation. 6-month formulations may also have cost benefits compared to shorter-acting doses. Despite similar levels of T suppression during the labeled dosing period, individual 6-month LHRH agonist formulations appear to have unique profiles, e.g., 6-month subcutaneous leuprolide acetate (LA) results in lower T escape rates compared to 6-month intramuscular LA, if dosing is late. Conclusion: The efficacy and practicality offered by 6-month LHRH formulations suggest these could reduce opportunities for late injections by requiring fewer office visits and provide greater confidence that efficacy will be maintained should there be extenuating circumstances leading to delays in therapy administration, as experienced during the recent pandemic.

A randomized, prospective, active-controlled study comparing intramuscular long-acting paliperidone palmitate versus oral antipsychotics in patients with schizophrenia at risk of violent behavior

ObjectivePaliperidone palmitate (PP) is an effective long-acting antipsychotic injection, but its impact on the behavior of schizophrenia patients with dangerous tendencies requires further investigation. This study aims to explore the effects of long-term antipsychotic treatment on this population in the community. MethodsThis 49-week, randomized controlled trial was conducted across 21 communities in Wuhan and enrolled 134 schizophrenia patients at risk for violent behavior. With a fixed block size of 10, participants were randomly assigned to receive either intramuscular PP 1-month formulation (PP1M) or oral antipsychotic medication (OAP) at a 1:1 ratio. Changes in patients' risk for violent/aggressive behavior, family burden, social, and cognitive functioning were measured using VRAPP, MOAS, PANSS, FBS, PSP, and RBANS scales from baseline to endpoint. Longitudinal data from multiple repeated measures were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models. ResultsThe study protocol was completed by 77.6% of the patients overall. Significant improvements were observed in the risk assessment scores, MOAS total score, PANSS total score, PSP total score, and FBS total score of patients in the PP1M group from baseline to the end of treatment (all P < 0.05). Importantly, compared to patients in the OAP group, the improvements in these measures were also significantly greater in the PP1M group. Commonly observed AEs, such as hyperprolactinemia (70.3% vs. 62.65%) and muscle tension (45.3% vs. 57.8%), were considered to be the PP-related AEs. Nonetheless, the differences between the two groups did not reach statistical significance, and no new safety concerns emerged. ConclusionsOur study suggests that PP long-acting injection (LAI) is a safe and effective treatment option for community-dwelling schizophrenia patients with impulsive violence and risky behaviors.

Efficacy and Safety of Triptorelin 3-Month Formulation in Chinese Children with Central Precocious Puberty: A Phase3, Open-Label, Single-Arm Study.

Triptorelin is available as 1- and 3-month prolonged-release (PR) formulations; at the time of the study, only the former was approved for central precocious puberty (CPP) in China. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of the triptorelin 3-month PR formulation in Chinese children with CPP. In this 12-month, prospective, open-label, multicentre, single-arm study (NCT04736602), Chinese children (mean age [standard deviation (SD)], 7.6 ± 0.8years) with CPP received triptorelin pamoate 15mg on day1 and at months 3, 6 and 9. The primary endpoint was the proportion with luteinizing hormone (LH) suppression (stimulated peak LH ≤ 3IU/L after gonadotropin-releasing hormone [GnRH] stimulation) at month 3. Secondary endpoints included changes from baseline in hormone levels and clinical parameters, as well as safety assessments. Overall, 32 children were enrolled, including three boys. LH suppression to prepubertal levels (≤ 3IU/L) after GnRH stimulation was observed in 100%, 93.5% and 93.5% of participants at months 3, 6 and 12, respectively. Basal and peak LH and follicle-stimulating hormone levels were substantially suppressed at months 3, 6 and 12, and most participants showed sex hormone suppression. At months 6 and 12 respectively 92.9% and 89.3% of girls had stable breast development, and all boys had stable genital development. There was a decrease in mean growth velocity from baseline (8.96cm/year) to months 3, 6 and 12 (8.07, 5.24 and 6.94cm/year, respectively). The mean difference between bone and chronological age decreased from baseline (2.85years) to month 12 (2.39years). In girls, uterine length was stable or reduced at month 12; in boys, testicular volume was reduced. Triptorelin was well tolerated. The triptorelin 3-month PR formulation demonstrated similar efficacy to that previously reported in non-Chinese patients with CPP and had an acceptable safety profile. This supports triptorelin 3-month PR as a viable option for Chinese children with CPP.

Cost-utility analysis of using paliperidone palmitate in schizophrenia in China.

Objective: Long-acting injections (LAIs) of paliperidone palmitate have been shown to improve medication adherence and relieve psychotic symptoms. However, the specific cost-utility analysis of these LAIs in schizophrenia in China remains unclear. Methods: A multi-state Markov model was constructed to simulate the economic outcomes of patients with schizophrenia in China who received paliperidone palmitate 1-month formulation (PP1M), paliperidone palmitate 3-month formulation (PP3M), and paliperidone extended-release (ER). A cost-utility analysis was conducted, mostly derived from published literature and clinical databases. All costs and utilities were discounted at a rate of 5% per annum. The primary outcome measure was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). A series of sensitivity analyses were also applied. Results: After 20years, compared to ER, using PP1M resulted in an increased discounted cost from $36,252.59 to $43,207.28. This increased cost was associated with a gain in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) from 8.60 to 9.45. As a result, the ICER for PP1M was estimated to be $8,247.46/QALY, which was lower than the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $12,756.55/QALY. When using PP3M instead of ER, the incremental cost was $768.81 and the incremental utility was 0.88 QALYs, projecting an ICER of $873.13/QALY, which was also lower than the WTP threshold of $12,756.55/QALY. The univariate sensitivity analysis showed that the costs of PP1M, PP3M, and ER had the greatest impact on ICERs. The probability sensitivity analysis (PSA) revealed that when the WTP thresholds were $12,756.55/QALY, the probability of PP1M and PP3M being cost-effective was 59.2% and 66.0%, respectively. Conclusion: From the Chinese healthcare system perspective, PP3M and PP1M are both more cost-effective compared to ER, and PP3M has notable cost-utility advantages over PP1M.

Long-term Efficacy and Safety of Paliperidone 6-month Formulation: An Open-label 2-year Extension of a 1-year Double-blind Study in Adult Participants With Schizophrenia.

Paliperidone palmitate 6-month (PP6M) demonstrated noninferiority to paliperidone palmitate 3-month (PP3M) in preventing relapse in patients with schizophrenia in a phase-3 double-blind (DB) study (NCT03345342). Here, we report long-term efficacy and safety results from a 2-year single-arm, open-label extension (OLE; NCT04072575) of this DB study. Participants who completed the DB study without relapse were enrolled and followed-up every 3 months up to 2 years. Participants received 4 PP6M gluteal-injections (700/1000mg eq.) at baseline, 6-month, 12-month, and 18-month visits. Efficacy endpoints included assessment of relapse, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score, Personal and Social Performance (PSP) score, and Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) scale change from baseline. Safety was assessed by treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), physical examinations, and laboratory tests. Of 178 participants enrolled, 154 (86.5%) completed the OLE; mean age: 40.4 years, men: 70.8%. Mean duration of PP6M exposure during OLE was 682.1 days. Overall, 7/178 (3.9%) participants relapsed between 20-703 days after enrolment. Mean (SD) change from baseline to endpoint: PANSS total score, 0.7 (8.22); CGI-S, 0.0 (0.51); PSP Scale, 0.5 (7.47). Overall, 111/178 participants (62.4%) reported ≥1 TEAE; most common (>5%) TEAEs were headaches (13.5%) and increased blood prolactin/hyperprolactinemia (18.0%); 8/178 (4.5%) participants experienced serious TEAEs, and 6/178 (3.4%) participants withdrew due to TEAEs; no deaths were reported. The relapse rate observed with PP6M during the 2-year OLE was low (3.9%). Clinical and functional improvements demonstrated in the DB study were maintained during OLE and no new safety concerns were identified.

Tolerability profile of paliperidone palmitate formulations: A pharmacovigilance analysis of the EUDRAVigilance database.

Long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) have proven to be effective in the maintenance treatment of patients suffering from schizophrenia, and their safety and tolerability profiles represent a key factor in their long-term use and choice in clinical practice. Paliperidone palmitate (PP) is the only second-generation LAI (SGA-LAI), available in both one- (PP1M) and 3-month (PP3M) formulations. However, real-world prospective studies on PP1M and PP3M are still few and mostly conducted on small samples. In this context, we aimed to better define the safety and tolerability profile of PP using real world pharmacovigilance data. We retrospectively analyzed the publicly available data regarding Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs), presenting PP1M and/or PP3M as suspected drugs, reported on EUDRAVigilance between 2011 and June 30th, 2022. ICSRs relative to at least one SGA-LAI other than PP, reported between 2003 and June 30th, 2022, were also examined as reference group. Data were evaluated with a descriptive analysis, and then, as disproportionality measures, crude reporting odds ratio (ROR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. A total of 8,152 ICSRs met the inclusion criteria, of those 77.7% (n = 6,332) presented as suspected drug PP1M, 21.2% (n = 1,731) PP3M, while 89 cases indicated both PP1M and PP3M. Significantly higher probabilities of reporting in PP-related reports were observed for the primary Standardized MedDRA Queries "Sexual Dysfunctions" (ROR = 1.45; 95% CI 1.23-1.70), "Haemodynamic oedema, effusions and fluid overload" (ROR = 1.42; 1.18-1.70), as well as "Fertility disorders" (ROR = 2.69; 1.51-4.80). Our analysis indicates that the tolerability and safety profiles of PP are in line with what is known for the other SGA-LAIs. However, differences regarding endocrine system ADRs have been noticed. The results presented in this work do not discourage the prescription of SGA-LAI formulations but aim to enhance their safety.

Abstract OT3-04-01: A Phase 3 study evaluating ovarian suppression following three-month leuprolide acetate in combination with endocrine therapy in premenopausal subjects with HR+, HER2-negative breast cancer (OVELIA)

Abstract Background: In US clinical practice, GnRH agonists are widely used to suppress ovarian function in pre/perimenopausal patients with breast cancer that is moderate-to high-risk for recurrence. Despite extensive use of leuprolide acetate (LA) for ovarian suppression, regulatory approval for this indication has not been established in the US. Additionally, existing three month formulations may not reliably provide ovarian suppression, as demonstrated by escapes in estradiol (E2). An extended-release LA product with a 3-month dosing period specifically developed for ovarian suppression in patients with breast cancer could fill this unmet need. TOL2506 is a 3-month, extended-release formulation of 30 mg of LA. This combination of active drug and in situ polymeric extended release technology is expected to deliver higher exposure to drug than the currently available 3-month (22.5 mg) formulations of LA marketed for advanced prostate cancer and potentially reduce escapes in E2 over the dosing period. Methods: TOL2506A (OVELIA) is a phase 3, single arm, open-label study evaluating the effectiveness of TOL2506 to suppress ovarian function in premenopausal women with HR+, HER2-negative breast cancer. Approximately 250 subjects will be enrolled targeting 220 evaluable subjects, with 30% aged 40 years or younger. Subjects must be premenopausal women, age 18-49 (inclusive), with a diagnosis of Stage I, II, or III HR+, HER2-negative breast cancer (ER&amp;gt;1% and/or, PR&amp;gt;1%, HER2-negative per ASCO CAP guidelines), who are candidates for ovarian suppression with endocrine therapy. For subjects receiving chemotherapy, premenopausal status will be determined prior to initiating chemotherapy. Male subjects with HR+, HER2-negative breast cancer may also be eligible, but will be evaluated for safety analyses only. Eligible subjects will enter the 48 week Treatment Period in 2 groups: those receiving tamoxifen concurrently with TOL2506 or those who initiate therapy with an aromatase inhibitor (AI; letrozole, anastrozole, or exemestane) beginning 6 weeks after the first administration of TOL2506, if E2 &amp;lt; 20 pg/mL has been achieved. After Week 12, subjects will be allowed to switch from receiving an AI to receiving tamoxifen or from tamoxifen to AI at the Investigator’s discretion. Subjects will receive 4 doses of TOL2506 every 12 weeks over the 48 week study duration. The primary endpoint to be evaluated is ovarian suppression, defined as ≥ 90% of subjects with LH levels &amp;lt; 4 IU/L at Week 6. Secondary endpoints include suppression of LH, E2 (&amp;lt; 20 pg/mL for tamoxifen cohort and &amp;lt; 2.72 pg/mL for AI cohort) and absence of menses at weeks 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48. NCT04906395 Citation Format: Ryan Turncliff, Erika Hamilton, Kerlin Lynch, Stuart N. Atkinson. A Phase 3 study evaluating ovarian suppression following three-month leuprolide acetate in combination with endocrine therapy in premenopausal subjects with HR+, HER2-negative breast cancer (OVELIA) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-04-01.

Efficacy of paliperidone palmitate 3-month formulation in preventing hospital admissions and emergency room visits. 66 months of follow-up

IntroductionPaliperidone Palmitate 3-month formulation (PP3M) has shown a significantly longer time to relapse compared to placebo, with similar efficacy and safety to Paliperidone Palmitate 1-month (PP1M) (Carpiniello et al. Drug Des. Devel. Ther. 2016; 10 1731–1742).ObjectivesThe main objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of PP3M in preventing hospital admissions and emergency room visits, in people with non-acute schizophrenia in a naturalistic psychiatric outpatient settingMethodsSample: 30 people with diagnosis of schizophrenia (DSM 5 criteria), who had started treatment with PP3M, after being stabilized with PP1M (the dose was not modified in the four months prior to inclusion in the study)Quarterly basis, the following evaluations were performed during a follow-up period of 66 months:The Clinical Global Impression-Schizophrenia scale (CGI-SCH)Treatment adherence, concomitant medication and the number of hospitalizations and emergency visitsEfficacy values: Percentage of patients who remained free of admissions at the end of 66 months of follow-up.Other evaluation criteria: Percentage of patients who never visited the emergency department at the end of 66 months of follow-up. Average change from baseline visit to the final evaluation as assessed by score obtained on the following scale: GSI-SCH, percentage of patients on antipsychotic monotherapy and treatment adherence rate.ResultsThe mean dose of PP3M was 401. 55 mgThe percentage of patients who remained free of admissions at the end of the 66 months was 83.25% and the percentage of patients who never visited the emergency department at the end of 66 months was 79.92%Mean variations from baseline scores at 66 months were: (-0.36 ±0-37) on the GCI-SCH.The percentage of patients on antipsychotic monotherapy at the end of the 66 months was 76.56%The rate of adherence was 86.58%.ConclusionsIn our study, we found that paliperidone palmitate 3-month formulation was effective in reducing the number of admissions and visits to the emergency department, under conditions of daily clinical practice.Disclosure of InterestNone Declared

Long-term efficacy and safety of paliperidone 6-month formulation: An open-label extension of a double-blind study in adult patients with schizophrenia

IntroductionPaliperidone palmitate 6-month (PP6M), administered twice-yearly, demonstrated non-inferiority to paliperidone palmitate 3-month (PP3M) in preventing relapse in patients with schizophrenia in a phase-3 randomized, double-blind (DB) global study.1 We report results of a 2-year single-arm, open-label extension (OLE) of this study (NCT04072575).ObjectivesTo assess long-term efficacy and safety of PP6M in patients with schizophrenia.MethodsPatients who completed DB study without relapse were enrolled and followed up every 3 months for up to 2 years. Patients received 4 PP6M injections (700/1000 mg eq.) at baseline, 6-month, 12-month, and 18-month visits. Efficacy endpoints included relapse rate, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score, Personal and Social Performance (PSP) score, and Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) scale change from baseline. Safety was assessed by treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), physical examinations and laboratory tests.ResultsOf 178 patients, 154 (86.5%) completed the study; mean age: 40.4 years; 70.8% were men. Mean duration of PP6M exposure was 682.1 days. Overall, 7/178 (3.9%) patients relapsed between 20 to 703 days after enrolment. Mean (SD) change from baseline to endpoint: PANSS total score, 0.7 (8.22); CGI-S, 0.0 (0.51); PSP Scale, 0.5 (7.47). Overall, 111/178 patients (62.4%) reported ≥1 TEAE; most common (&gt;10%) TEAEs were headache (13.5%) and blood prolactin increased (10.7%). Total, 7/24 patients withdrew due to TEAEs, and 8/178 (4.5%) patients experienced serious TEAEs; no deaths were reported.ConclusionsRelapse rate with PP6M was very low (&lt;4%). Clinical improvements in PANSS, CGI-S, and PSP scales demonstrated in DB study were maintained during this 2-year OLE study and no new safety concerns were identified.Reference1. D. Najarian et al. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2022 Mar 17;25(3):238-251.Disclosure of InterestD. Najarian Shareolder of: Johnson &amp; Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research &amp; Development, LLC, I. Turkoz Shareolder of: Johnson &amp; Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research &amp; Development, LLC, S. Galderisi Consultant of: Janssen, Gedeon Richter-Recordati, Angelini, Speakers bureau of: Angelini, Gedeon Richter-Recordati, Janssen, Lundbeck, Sunovion, Recordati, H. Lamaison Grant / Research support from: Novartis, Eli Lilly, Lundbeck, Servier, AstraZeneca, Wyeth, Pfizer, Otsuka, Takeda, Sunovion, Roche, Janssen Pharmaceutical, Speakers bureau of: Servier, Abbot, Raymonds, Raffo, Temis Lostalo and Janssen Pharmaceutical, P. Zalitacz: None Declared, S. Aravind Shareolder of: Johnson &amp; Johnson, Employee of: Advarra, Inc. USA, U. Richarz Shareolder of: Johnson &amp; Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research &amp; Development-Cilag, Switzerland.

Impact of 6-month triptorelin formulation on predicted adult height and basal gonadotropin levels in patients with central precocious puberty.

Triptorelin, a long-acting gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist, is available in 1-, 3-, and 6-month formulations to treat central precocious puberty (CPP). The triptorelin pamoate 22.5-mg 6-month formulation recently approved for CPP offers greater convenience to children by reducing the injection frequency. However, worldwide research on using the 6-month formulation to treat CPP is scarce. This study aimed to determine the impact of the 6-month formulation on predicted adult height (PAH), changes in gonadotropin levels, and related variables. We included 42 patients (33 girls and nine boys) with idiopathic CPP treated with a 6-month triptorelin (6-mo TP) formulation for over 12 months. Auxological parameters, including chronological age, bone age, height (cm and standard deviation score [SDS]), weight (kg and SDS), target height (TH), and Tanner stage, were evaluated at baseline, and after 6, 12, and 18 months of treatment. Hormonal parameters, including serum luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), and estradiol for girls or testosterone for boys, were analyzed concurrently. The mean age at treatment initiation was 8.6 ± 0.83 (8.3 ± 0.62 for girls, 9.6 ± 0.68 for boys). The peak LH level following intravenous GnRH stimulation at diagnosis was 15.47 ± 9.94 IU/L. No progression of the modified Tanner stage was observed during treatment. Compared to baseline, LH, FSH, estradiol, and testosterone were significantly reduced. In particular, the basal LH levels were well suppressed to less than l.0 IU/L, and the LH/FSH ratio was less than 0.66. The bone age/chronological age ratio remained stable with a decreasing trend (1.15 at the start of treatment, 1.13 at 12 months, 1.11 at 18 months). PAH SDS increased during treatment (0.77 ± 0.79 at baseline, 0.87 ± 0.84 at the start of treatment, 1.01 ± 0.93 at six months, and 0.91 ± 0.79 at 12 months). No adverse effects were observed during treatment. The 6-mo TP suppressed the pituitary-gonadal axis stably and improved the PAH during treatment. Considering its convenience and effectiveness, a significant shift to long-acting formulations can be expected.

Adherence, Persistence, Readmissions, and Costs in Medicaid Members with Schizophrenia or Schizoaffective Disorder Initiating Paliperidone Palmitate Versus Switching Oral Antipsychotics: A Real-World Retrospective Investigation.

Long-acting injectable antipsychotic agents have been suggested to improve adherence and patient outcomes in schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. The purpose of this study was to assess medication use patterns (i.e., medication adherence, persistence), hospital and emergency department readmissions, and total direct medical costs of Oklahoma Medicaid members with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder switching from an oral antipsychotic (OAP) to once-monthly paliperidone palmitate (PP1M) or to another OAP (OAP-switch). A historical cohort analysis was conducted from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2020 among adults aged ≥ 18 and ≤ 64years with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder who were previously treated with an OAP. The first claim for PP1M or a new OAP defined the study index date. Members who transitioned from PP1M to 3-month formulation (PP3M) were included (i.e., PP1M/PP3M). Proportion of days covered (PDC), 45-day treatment gaps, 30-day readmissions to hospitals or emergency department, and total direct medical costs were assessed using multivariable, machine-learning least absolute shrinkage, and selection operator (Lasso) regressions controlling for numerous demographic, clinical, mental health, and provider characteristics. Among 295 Medicaid members meeting full inclusion criteria, 183 involved PP1M/PP3Ms (44 PP1M cases transitioned to PP3M) and 112 involved an OAP-switch. The multivariable-adjusted odds of readmission were significantly associated with a 45-day treatment gap (p < 0.05) and non-adherence (i.e., PDC < 80%) (p < 0.05). Relative to PP1M/PP3Ms, the multivariable analyses also indicated that OAP-switch was associated with an 18.5% lower PDC, 92.3% higher number of 45-day treatment gaps, and an approximately 90% higher odds of all-cause 30-day readmission (p < 0.05). The adjusted pre- to post-index change in cost was approximately 49% lower for OAP-switches versus PP1M/PP3Ms (p < 0.001), although unadjusted post-index costs did not differ between groups (p = 0.440). This real-world investigation of adult Medicaid members with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder observed improved adherence and persistence with fewer readmissions with PP1M/PP3Ms versus OAP-switches.

Results from PSIPROSPER: A multicenter retrospective study to analyze the impact of treatment with paliperidone palmitate 1-month on clinical outcomes and hospital resource utilization in adult patients with schizophrenia in Portugal.

Schizophrenia is a chronic psychiatric disorder with a significant impact worldwide. The early onset and its relapsing nature pose a significant challenge to patients and caregivers. The PSIPROSPER study aimed to characterize the real-world context of schizophrenia treatment in Portugal and to measure the impact of including paliperidone palmitate 1-month formulation (PP1M) in the clinical outcomes (relapses and hospitalizations) and healthcare resource utilization, in a context in which payment scheme in Portugal allows for patients to receive free antipsychotics if prescribed at public hospitals. This was a multicenter, retrospective, observational study. Male and female adults with a diagnosis of schizophrenia who initiated treatment with PP1M after a minimum of 12 months on an Oral Antipsychotic (OAP), and with complete medical charts, were consecutively included. A mirror-image design over 24 months allowed the comparison of outcomes before and after the PP1M introduction. Out of the 51 patients included, 80.4% were male, with a mean age of 34 (±9.8) years. Around 92% of patients were being treated with PP1M at inclusion. Lack of adherence to previous OAP was the main driver for PP1M initiation. Only 9.8% of patients were hospitalized during the PP1M period vs. 64.7% during the OAP period (p < 0.0001). The mean number of hospitalizations (0.1) was significantly lower during the PP1M period (p < 0.0001). Type of treatment was the only variable found to be significant in predicting a lower hospitalization rate and a lower risk of hospitalization. Relapses were significantly lower (p < 0.0001) in PP1M (21.6%) vs. OAP (83.7%). Similarly, the mean change in the number of relapses (p < 0.0001) showed significantly better outcomes in PP1M. This study supports PP1M as part of schizophrenia treatment in Portugal. Given the lower number of relapses and hospitalizations observed in schizophrenia patients treated with PP1M when compared to OAP-treated patients, this real-world study seems to provide further evidence to support the use of PP1M to treat this condition, in line with previous research. In the context of scarce public resources, these benefits should be carefully considered by healthcare decision-makers to ensure optimal value-based treatment strategies.

Asian Subgroup Analysis of the REMISSIO Study: A Long-Term Efficacy and Safety Study of Paliperidone Palmitate 3-month Formulation in Patients with Stable Schizophrenia in a Naturalistic Clinical Setting.

ObjectiveTo evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of three-monthly paliperidone palmitate (PP3M) in Asian patients with stable schizophrenia in a naturalistic setting.MethodsAsian patients recruited between May 2016 and March 2018 from the prospective, single-arm, non-randomized, open-label, multi-national REMISSIO study were analyzed. Patients received PP3M over 12 months following ≥ 4 months of treatment with one-monthly paliperidone palmitate. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved symptomatic remission. Other endpoints were changes in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and Personal and Social Performance (PSP) total scores, hospitalization rates, and safety.ResultsA total of 71 patients (23.3%) were Asian (South Korea 33, Malaysia 21, Taiwan 17); 95.8% of patients completed the study. At LOCF, 71% of Asian patients achieved symptomatic remission compared to the overall population (n = 172/303, 56.8%). Improvements in mean (standard deviation) PANSS and PSP total scores from baseline to LOCF in Asian patients and overall population were clinically significant. A lower proportion of Asian patients had ≥ 1 psychiatric hospitalization after PP3M treatment (n = 1/70, 1.4%) than during the 12 months before (n = 12/70, 17.1%); compared with patients in the overall population after (n = 8/303, 2.6%) and before PP3M treatment (n = 37/303, 12.2%). The overall incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events across Asian patients was 62.9% compared to 53.1% in the overall population. Safety findings were consistent with the known safety profile of PP3M.ConclusionOur findings confirm existing evidence on the efficacy and tolerability of PP3M in Asian patients with stable schizophrenia over 12 months of treatment.

A single-dose, randomized, open-labeled, parallel-group study comparing the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety of leuprolide acetate microspheres 3.75mg and Enantone® 3.75mg in healthy male subjects.

Leuprolide acetate microspheres developed by Shanghai Livzon Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (T) have been marketed in China for more than 10 years, benefiting a large number of patients, and will continue to play an important role in China. However, as a generic drug, it is unclear whether there is a difference in efficacy between T and the original product Enantone® (R). This study compared the differences in efficacy and safety of two 1-month depot formulations in 48 healthy Chinese male subjects by comparing multiple pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) parameters. The main research indicators were the PK parameters of leuprolide (Cmax, AUC0-t, AUC0-D7, and AUCD7-t) and the PD parameters of testosterone (Emax, AUEC0-t, AUEC0-D7, and AUECD7-t) after 42 days of administration. The Cmax, AUC0-t, AUC0-D7 and AUCD7-t of leuprolide were slightly higher in the T group than in the R group with 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of 94.43–118.53%, 109.13–141.88%, 109.53–139.54%, and 105.17–145.74%, respectively. No significant differences in the PD parameters (Emax, AUEC0-t, AUEC0-D7, and AUECD7-t) existed between the T and R groups, and 90% CIs were 62.80–93.57%, 88.17–110.55, 95.72%–118.50%, and 79.77–105.63, respectively. At 672 h (D28), the castration rate of T was 91.30% (21/23) and that of R was 60.87% (14/23). The PK characteristics were consistent and the inhibitory effects on testosterone levels were similar in both T and R groups; further, clinical safety was observed for both T and R formulations, suggesting that these two products can replace each other in clinical practice. Clinical Trial Registration: http://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn/clinicaltrials.searchlistdetail.dhtml, identifier CTR20200641.

Clinical relevance of Paliperidone Palmitate three-month intramuscular injection formulation: an Italian Real-World, Retrospective, one-year Mirror Image Study

IntroductionPaliperidone Palmitate 3-month (PP3M) formulation, introduced in Italy since 2017, is an effective and safety therapeutic option for patients with schizophrenia, clinically stable with 1-month formulation (PP1M). Only a few “Real World” studies investigated the clinical relevance of PP3M and the long-term clinical and health resource utilization outcomes.ObjectivesThe aim of this retrospective, mirror image study was to evaluate the efficacy of PP3M in terms of continuity of care and number of hospitalizations.MethodsFifty outpatients treated with Paliperidone Palmitate (PP) were recruited from a Community Mental Health Centre (CMHC) in Milan. Statistical analysis were conducted with SPSS 26. Frequencies of hospitalization 6 months before and after the start of PP3M were compared using the McNemar test, setting the significance to p&lt;0.05.ResultsThis study involved 34 patients (68%) treated with PP1M and 16 (32%) treated with PP3M.The median time interval between PP1M and PP3M was 14 months. After the switch to PP3M, 69% of patients continued to visit the CMHC with an unchanged frequency (50% once/month, 6% more than once/month), while 31% with a decreased frequency (once/3 months). No patient increased the frequency of CMHC visits or started visiting it discontinuously. 44% of subjects had had at least one hospitalization prior to the switch and no hospitalizations after (p=0.016). Moreover, no patients showed increased hospitalizationsConclusionsIn this study PP3M clinical relevance was confirmed comparing pre-initiation and post-initiation 6-months time intervals: hospitalizations number significantly decreased, while the continuity of care was preserved. Further studies on a greater sample are necessary to support these preliminary data.DisclosureNo significant relationships.

A phase 3, single arm, open-label study evaluating ovarian suppression following 3-month leuprolide acetate for injectable suspension in combination with endocrine therapy in premenopausal subjects with HR+, HER2-negative breast cancer (OVELIA).

TPS608 Background: In US clinical practice, GnRH agonists are widely used to suppress ovarian function in pre/perimenopausal patients with breast cancer that is moderate-to high-risk for recurrence. Despite extensive use of leuprolide acetate (LA) for ovarian suppression, regulatory approval for this indication has not been established in the US. Additionally, existing three month formulations may not reliably provide ovarian suppression, as demonstrated by escapes in estradiol (E2). An extended-release LA product with a 3-month dosing period specifically developed for ovarian suppression in patients with breast cancer could fill this unmet need. TOL2506 is a 3-month, extended-release formulation of 30 mg of LA. This combination of active drug and in situ polymeric extended release technology is expected to deliver higher exposure to drug than the currently available 3-month (22.5 mg) formulations of LA marketed for advanced prostate cancer and potentially reduce escapes in E2 over the dosing period. Methods: TOL2506A (OVELIA) is a phase 3, single arm, open-label study evaluating the effectiveness of TOL2506 to suppress ovarian function in premenopausal women with HR+, HER2-negative breast cancer. Approximately 250 subjects will be enrolled, with 30% aged 40 years or younger. Subjects must be premenopausal women, age 18-49, with a diagnosis of Stage I, II, or III HR+, HER2-negative breast cancer (ER &gt; 1% and/or, PR &gt; 1%, HER2-negative per ASCO CAP guidelines), who are candidates for ovarian suppression with endocrine therapy. For subjects receiving chemotherapy, premenopausal status will be determined, and confirmed by central lab hormone testing, prior to initiating chemotherapy. Male subjects with HR+, HER2-negative breast cancer may also be eligible, but will be evaluated for safety analyses only. Eligible subjects will enter the 48 week treatment period in 2 groups: those receiving tamoxifen concurrently with TOL2506 or those who initiate therapy with an aromatase inhibitor (AI; letrozole, anastrozole, or exemestane) beginning 6 weeks after the first administration of TOL2506, if E2 &lt; 20 pg/mL has been achieved. After Week 12, subjects will be allowed to switch from receiving an AI to receiving tamoxifen or from tamoxifen to AI at the Investigator’s discretion. Subjects will receive 4 doses of TOL2506 every 12 weeks over the 48 week study duration. Achievement of ovarian suppression will be defined as ≥ 90% of subjects with luteinizing hormone (LH) levels &lt; 4 IU/L at Week 6. Secondary endpoints include suppression of LH, E2 (&lt; 20 pg/mL for tamoxifen cohort and &lt; 2.72 pg/mL for AI cohort) and absence of menses at weeks 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48. Clinical trial information: NCT04906395.