5-year Overall Survival Rates Research Articles

Pretreatment neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic factor in recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer treated with pembrolizumab.

Pembrolizumab-containing regimens are the standard first-line treatment for recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M HNSCC). The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (CAR) have been reported to be important prognostic factors in a variety of carcinomas, but none have been investigated in combination with pembrolizumab and chemotherapy or in first-line treatment. Seventy-four patients with R/M HNSCC received pembrolizumab-containing regimens at Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan, from April 2020 to March 2023. Patient characteristics, tumor response, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and laboratory findings were reviewed. Associations between NLR, CAR, and survival outcomes were analyzed. The 1-year OS and 1-year PFS rates were 60.4% and 18.1%, respectively. The disease control rate was 66.2%. In multivariate analysis, low NLR (< 5) was significantly associated with better OS and PFS. NLR may be a predictive factor for OS and PFS in patients with R/M HNSCC treated with a pembrolizumab-containing regimen.

Real-world outcomes of avelumab plus axitinib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma in Japan: long-term follow-up from the J-DART2 retrospective study.

Avelumab + axitinib was approved for advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) in Japan in December 2019. We report long-term real-world outcomes with first-line avelumab + axitinib from the J-DART2 study in Japan. J-DART2 was a multicenter, noninterventional, retrospective study examining clinical data from patients with curatively unresectable locally advanced or metastatic RCC who started treatment with first-line avelumab + axitinib in Japan between December 2019 and October 2022. Endpoints included patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes. Data from 150 patients across 19 sites were analyzed; median follow-up was 18.7months (95% CI, 16.3-20.6months). Median age was 70.5years; 26.0% of patients wereaged ≤64years, 42.7% wereaged 65-74years, and 31.3% wereaged ≥75years. International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium risk was favorable in 26.0%, intermediate in 54.7% (1 risk factor in 30.7%; 2 risk factors in 24.0%), and poor in 19.3% of patients. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 17.1months, with 1- and 2-year PFS rates of 57.7% and 37.5%, respectively. Median overall survival (OS) was not reached, with 1- and 2-year OS rates of 90.6% and 84.7%, respectively. Objective response rate was 53.3%; disease control rate was 88.9%. Outcomes were similar across age groups, including patients aged ≥75years. J-DART2 is the largest retrospective study to report long-term real-world outcomes in patients with aRCC treated with avelumab + axitinib in Japan. Findings were similar to those observed in previous studies and support the benefit of avelumab + axitinib in clinical practice in Japan.

Prognostic impact of the newly revised IASLC proposed grading system for invasive lung adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of the newly revised International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) grading system (2020) on the 5-year overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients with lung adenocarcinoma (LADC). Clinical studies that investigated the prognostic value of revised IASLC staging system in patients with LADC were retrieved from the PubMed, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane Library databases. This study was conducted in accordance to the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and checklists. Based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, we included 12 studies for analysis. The grade of LADC was assessed by revised IASLC system, which included three grades. Compared to Grade 3 LADC, grade 1 (total [95% CI]: 1.38 [1.19, 1.60]) and grade 2 (total [95% CI]: 1.29 [1.15, 1.44]) LADC had higher 5-year OS rates. Similarly, Grade 1 (total [95% CI]: 1.76 [1.42, 2.18]) and Grade 2 (total [95% CI]: 1.51 [1.28, 1.77]) had higher 5-year RFS rates Grade 3 LADC. However, 5-year OS and RFS had no significant difference between Grade 1 and Grade 2 patients. This systematic review and meta-analysis provides evidence that the newly revised IASLC grading system is significantly associated with the prognosis of patients with LADC, where Grade 3 indicated unfavorable prognosis.

The 5-factor modified frailty index as a prognostic factor for stereotactic radiosurgery in meningioma management.

Meningiomas are the most frequent primary intracranial malignancy. While surgical resection can confer long term tumor control, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is often used for small, asymptomatic tumors in the adjuvant setting. Frailty has been associated with increased rates of peri-operative morbidity but has yet to be defined in the setting of SRS for meningiomas. We therefore sought to examine the relationship between frailty and clinical/radiographic outcomes of patients with meningiomas who have undergone SRS. A single-center, retrospective cohort study classified patients by their 5-factor modified frailty index (mFI-5) score into pre-frail (0-1) and frail (2-5) at the time of SRS treatment. Evaluations of overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), local control (LC), and distant control (DC) were performed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to further define factors associated with OS/PFS. 94 patients met inclusion criteria and underwent SRS for meningioma treatment from 2019 to 2023. Analyses compared prefrail (0-1) and frail (2-5) individuals. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated a near significant association between frailty and OS (HR 3.66, 95% CI 0.49-26.8 p = 0.05) with 3-year OS rates of 75.4% in the pre-frail versus 36.6% in the frail group. However, a significant relationship was demonstrated between frailty and PFS (HR: 2.95 95% CI 1.12-7.81, p = 0.02) with 3-year PFS rates of 90.5% in the pre-frail group versus 49.2% in the frail group. Univariable regression analysis demonstrated that frailty, prior surgical excision, and cumulative tumor volume predicted PFS. Frailty, as assessed by the mFI-5, did not independently predict OS but did predict PFS in individuals with meningioma undergoing SRS.

Significance of the geriatric nutritional risk index and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as prognostic indicators in older patients with gastric cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

The number of older patients with cancer is increasing with the progression of aging societies. In the current study, we sought to clarify the prognostic values of the geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) as a nutritional index and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as an inflammatory index in older patients with gastric cancer. Between January 2007 and December 2016, a total of 197 consecutive gastric cancer patients aged ≥ 75 years who underwent radical gastrectomy were enrolled in this study. The prognostic values of preoperative GNRI and NLR were assessed using time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, log-rank tests, and Cox regression analysis. The areas under the curve (AUCs) predicting 5-year overall survival (OS) were 0.668 for GNRI and 0.637 for NLR. The 5-year OS rates in the groups with low GNRI and NLR were 40.1% and 74.1% (p < 0.001), and those with high GNRI and NLR were 70.7% and 41.5% (p < 0.001), respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that GNRI (hazard ratio (HR): 0.584; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.356-0.960; p = 0.034) and NLR (HR: 2.470; 95% CI: 1.503-4.059; p < 0.001) were independent predictors for OS. The GNRI-NLR score constructed with GNRI and NLR had a higher AUC (0.698) than those of GNRI or NLR alone and was an independent prognostic factor (HR, 0.486; 95% CI: 0.363-0.651; p < 0.001). GNRI and NLR are useful prognostic biomarkers in older patients with gastric cancer aged≥75 years. The GNRI-NLR score could contribute to a more personalized and holistic approach to cancer treatment in this patient population.

The established of a machine learning model for predicting the efficacy of adjuvant interferon alpha1b in patients with advanced melanoma

BackgroundInterferon-alpha1b (IFN-α1b) has shown remarkable therapeutic potential as adjuvant therapy for melanoma. This study aimed to develop five machine learning models to evaluate the efficacy of postoperative IFN-α1b in patients with advanced melanoma.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 113 patients with the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage III-IV melanoma who received postoperative IFN-α1b therapy between July 2009 and February 2024. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Five machine learning models (Decision Tree, Cox Proportional Hazards, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, and LASSO regression) were developed and compared for their capacity to predict the outcomes of patients. Model performance was evaluated using concordance index (C-index), time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and decision curve analysis.ResultsThe 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year RFS rates were 71.10%, 43.10%, and 31.10%, respectively. For OS, the 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year OS rates were 99.10%, 82.30%, and 75.00%, respectively. The Decision Tree (DT) model demonstrated superior predictive performance with the highest C-index of 0.792. Time-dependent ROC analysis for predicting 1-, 2-, and 3-year RFS based on the DT model is 0.77, 0.79 and 0.76, respectively. Serum albumin emerged as the important predictor of RFS.ConclusionsOur study demonstrates the considerable efficacy DT model for predicting the efficacy of adjuvant IFN-α1b in patients with advanced melanoma. Serum albumin was identified as a key predictive factor of the treatment efficacy.

Phase II Trial of Induction Chemotherapy for Advanced Sinonasal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Outcomes after primary surgery for advanced sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) are poor. We tested whether induction chemotherapy (IC) can improve disease control or organ preservation. A phase II trial evaluated previously untreated patients with stage II-IV, M0 sinonasal SCC. Patients received IC with docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil, followed by chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for responders and surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy or CRT for non-responders. The primary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR) and locoregional control (LRC). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), organ preservation, and treatment toxicity. Of the 31 patients enrolled between 2008 and 2020, 28 were evaluated for efficacy. Disease was T4a, T4b, and N+ in 57%, 21%, and 36% of patients, respectively. The ORR was 82.1%; 17.9% of patients had stable disease, and 0% had progressive disease. Grade 3 and 4 adverse events (AE) occurred in 54% and 18% of patients, respectively; there were no Grade 5 AEs. The 2-year LRC and PFS rates were 64.3% (95% CI 40.4-77.6) and 52.4% (95% CI 32.3-69.0), respectively. The median PFS was 25.8 months. The median OS was 47.4 months, with a 2-year OS rate of 69.4% (95% CI 44.9-80.4). No survival difference was observed between surgery versus CRT (hazard ratio 1.07, 95% CI 0.9-3.84). Of patients alive at 2 years, 63% achieved organ preservation, avoiding maxillectomy (38%), craniotomy (13%), or orbital exenteration (38%). IC and response-directed treatment achieved promising disease control and added organ preservation for patients with advanced sinonasal SCC.

Five-year overall survival of early- and late-onset colorectal cancer in Medellín, Colombia: a comparative study

PurposeEarly-onset colorectal cancer (CRC) (EOCRC, < 50 years) has distinct clinicopathological features from late-onset CRC (LOCRC, ≥ 50 years). However, evidence on survival outcomes is contradictory. We aimed to analyse the differences in 5-year overall survival (OS) between EOCRC and LOCRC.MethodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted during 2018–2022. Individuals aged ≥ 18 years diagnosed with CRC at two hospitals in Medellín, Colombia were included. Clinicopathological and survival data were retrieved from the medical records and a public government database. Patients were categorized into EOCRC and LOCRC groups. Five-year OS rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and prognostic factors for OS were identified through Cox regression models.ResultsAmong 1022 patients, 52.5% were female, and 13.5% (n = 138) had EOCRC. Patients with EOCRC showed higher 5-year OS rates than LOCRC patients (54% vs. 32%). Univariable analyses indicated a 37% lower risk of death for EOCRC compared to LOCRC (HR: 0.633, 95%CI: 0.476–0.840, p = 0.002). After multivariable analyses, advanced staging and higher tumour grading were prognostic factors for worse OS (HR: 2.127, 95% CI:1.405–3.220, p = 0.0001; and HR: 12.896, 95%CI: 6.310-26.355, p = 0.000; respectively), and being in the EOCRC group remained as a prognostic factor for higher OS (HR: 0.482, 95% CI: 0.336–0.690, p = 0.000).ConclusionEOCRC is associated with significantly better 5-year OS rates and prognosis compared to LOCRC. Advanced stage and higher tumour grading are predictors of lower OS among all CRC patients. These findings highlight the importance of age-related risk stratification and personalized therapeutic approaches in CRC.

The Demographic and Clinical Characteristics, Prognostic Factors, and Survival Outcomes of Head and Neck Carcinosarcoma: A SEER Database Analysis

Background: Head and neck carcinosarcoma (HNCS) is a rare and highly aggressive malignancy with limited research, resulting in an incomplete understanding of disease progression and a lack of reliable prognostic tools. This study aimed to retrospectively analyze the clinical characteristics and outcomes of HNCS patients using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and to develop a nomogram to predict overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Methods: Patients diagnosed with HNCS from 1975 to 2020 were identified in the SEER database. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to identify independent prognostic indicators, with the optimal model selected using the minimal Akaike Information Criterion (AIC). The identified prognostic factors were incorporated into nomograms to predict OS and CSS. Model performance was assessed using the concordance index (C-index), area under the curve (AUC), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Survival curves were generated using Kaplan–Meier analysis and compared via the log-rank test. Results: A total of 152 HNCS patients were included, with 108 assigned to the training cohort and 44 to the validation cohort in a 7:3 ratio. Prognostic factors including age, primary tumor site, marital status, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, tumor size, pathological grade, and tumor stage were incorporated into the nomogram models. The models demonstrated strong predictive performance, with C-index values for OS and CSS of 0.757 and 0.779 in the training group, and 0.777 and 0.776 in the validation group, respectively. AUC values for predicting 3-, 5-, and 10-year OS were 0.662, 0.713, and 0.761, and for CSS the values were 0.726, 0.703, and 0.693. Kaplan–Meier analysis indicated significantly improved survival for patients with lower risk scores. The 3-, 5-, and 10-year OS rates for the entire cohort were 54.1%, 45.6%, and 35.1%, respectively, and the CSS rates were 62.9%, 57.5%, and 52.2%, respectively. Conclusions: This study provides validated nomograms for predicting OS and CSS in HNCS patients, offering a reliable tool to support clinical decision-making for this challenging malignancy. These nomograms enhance the ability to predict patient prognosis and personalize treatment strategies.

VALIDATION OF THE REVISED 2022 EUROPEAN LEUKEMIANET RISK STRATIFICATION IN ADULT PATIENTS WITH ACUTE MYELOID LEUKEMIA

In 2022, the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) risk stratification for patients with AML has been updated. We aimed to validate the prognostic value of the 2022 ELN classification (ELN22) evaluating 1,570 newly diagnosed AML patients (median age, 56 years) treated with cytarabine-based intensive chemotherapy regimens. As compared to the 2017 ELN classification (ELN17), allocating 595 (38%), 413 (26%) and 562 (36%) patients to the favorable, intermediate and adverse risk category, ELN22 risk was favorable, intermediate, and adverse in 575 (37%), 410 (26%), and 585 (37%) patients, respectively. Risk group allocation was revised in 340 patients (22%). Most patients were re-classified into ELN22 intermediate or ELN22 adverse risk group. The allocation of patients according to the ELN22 risk categories resulted in a significantly distinct event-free survival (EFS), relapse-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS). As compared to ELN17, reallocation according to the ELN22 recommendations resulted in a significantly improved prognostic discrimination for OS (3-year area under the curve (AUC) 0.71 vs. 0.67). In patients with ELN22 favorable risk AML, co-occurring MR gene mutations did not significantly impact outcome. Within the ELN22 adverse risk group, we observed marked survival differences across mutational groups (5-year OS rate of 21% and 3% in patients with myelodysplasia-related (MR) gene mutations and TP53-mutated patients, respectively). In patients harboring MR gene mutations, EZH2-, STAG2- and ZRSR2-mutated patients showed an intermediate-like OS. In patients with secondary AML and those who underwent allogeneic HCT, EFS and OS significantly differed between ELN22 risk groups, while prognostic abilities of ELN17 and ELN22 classifications were similar. In conclusion, the ELN22 risk stratification improves prognostic discrimination in a large cohort of intensively treated AML patients. Given the heterogeneous outcome in patients with MR gene alterations, ranging between those of intermediate and adverse risk patients, we suggest reevaluation of risk allocation in these patients.

Efficacy, safety, and biomarker analysis of TACE combined with lenvatinib plus sintilimab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a real-world study

BackgroundThe integration of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with systemic therapy has demonstrated improved survival outcomes in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, there is limited evidence evaluating the combination of TACE with the systemic regimen of anti-PD-1/L1 inhibitor plus lenvatinib. This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of TACE combined with lenvatinib and sintilimab in unresectable HCC patients.MethodsUnresectable HCC patients who received TACE in combination with sintilimab plus Lenvatinib as first-line treatment from 1 January 2020 to 31 March 2023 were included for the analysis. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were evaluated by modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria. Exploratory biomarker analysis was conducted.ResultsThe study included 70 patients with unresectable HCC, predominantly male and infected with Hepatitis B. The median follow-up duration for the whole cohort was 13.8 months (95% CI 11.08–16.7). The ORR was 61.4% (95% CI, 49.0%–72.8%) and the DCR was 68.6% (95%CI, 56.4%–79.2%). The median PFS was 13.2 months (95% CI 11.0-NA), with a corresponding 1-year PFS rate of 50.3% (95% CI 39.7%-65.5%). The median OS was not reached, and the 1-year OS rate was 89.3% (95% CI 81.4%–97.9%). The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were fatigue 38.6% (27/70), hypertension 32.9% (23/70), and hand-foot syndrome 31.4% (22/70). Most TRAEs were mild-to-moderate and manageable. In addition, significant predictive value was found in alpha-fetoprotein levels (AFP), with patients showing a level of decrease post-treatment having better PFS.ConclusionThe combination regimen demonstrated promising efficacy in treating unresectable HCC, accompanied by manageable safety profiles. Furthermore, the results of this investigation suggest that AFP holds promise as predictive biomarkers for this treatment strategy.

Enhancing outcomes of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia in workplace diversity in Thailand: multicenter study on behalf of the Thai Pediatric Oncology Group.

The Thai Pediatric Oncology Group (ThaiPOG) has adapted treatment regimens from the Children's Oncology Group (COG) to enhance outcomes for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). This study examined the risk factors and treatment results of pediatric ALL in Thailand. This multicenter study included newly diagnosed children (< 18years) with ALL in 19 centers between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2019. Most of the 1,157 patients (97.6%) were treated according to ThaiPOG protocols. The genetic testing was performed in 71% of patients. The patients were classified as standard (n = 539), high (n = 402), and very high (n = 130) risks. The 5-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 75% (95% confidence intervals (CI), 72%-77.8%) and 81.7% (95% CI, 78.9%-84.1%), respectively. The 5-year EFS rates of the standard-, high-, and very high-risk groups were 78.5% (95% CI, 74.1%-82.3%), 73.6% (95% CI, 68.5%-78%) (p = 0.761), and 65% (95% CI, 55.1%-73.3%) (p = 0.001), respectively, and the 5-year OS rates were 86.9% (95% CI, 83.1%-89.9%), 77.3% (95% CI, 72.5%-81.4%) (p = 0.001), and 73.1% (95% CI, 63.7%-80.4%) (p = 0.001), respectively. The independent risk factors for relapse and death were age ≥ 10years, white blood cells (WBCs) ≥ 50,000/mm3, M2 or M3 marrow status at the end of induction, and high-risk group. The overall outcome of Thai pediatric ALL has improved after the implementation of new modified COG treatment protocols. High-risk characteristics of ALL increased adverse outcome risk.

Margin-to-depth ratio as an independent prognostic factor in resected oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: A nationwide cohort study

BackgroundThe prognostic significance of margin-to-depth ratio (MDR) in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) remains unclear, particularly in comparison to traditional margin status. We aimed to examine the association between MDR and clinical outcomes in a large Taiwanese cohort. MethodsA total of 18,324 patients with first primary OCSCC were categorized by margin status: positive (1013), <5 mm (8371), and ≥ 5 mm (8940). Disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) served as the main outcome measures. ResultsAfter excluding patients with positive margins (MDR = 0), the optimal MDR cutoff value for DSS and OS was 0.6. Patients with MDR > 0.6 showed significantly better 5-year DSS and OS rates (87 %, 81 %) compared to those with MDR ≤ 0.6 (71 %, 63 %) and MDR = 0 (53 %, 43 %). Multivariable analysis identified MDR ≤ 0.6 as independently associated with both DSS and OS in the entire cohort (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.34/1.32). This finding was consistent in the subgroups with surgical margins < 5 mm (HR = 1.39 for DSS and 1.38 for OS) and margins ≥ 5 mm (HR = 1.21 for both DSS and OS). In subgroups with surgical margins < 5 mm and ≥ 5 mm, an MDR > 0.6 was associated with better survival outcomes. ConclusionsAn MDR (cutoff: 0.6) is independently associated with prognosis in OCSCC, offering improved risk stratification compared to margin status alone. While MDR may guide surgical margin modification, further research is needed to determine whether MDR could serve as a postoperative indicator for adjuvant therapy in patients with close or clear margins.

Two-Year Outcomes and Biomarker Analysis of Locally Advanced Gastric and Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy from the Phase II WuhanUHGI001 Trial.

This study reports the 2-year outcomes and biomarker analysis results of patients with locally advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) adenocarcinoma who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and immunotherapy in a phase II WuhanUHGI001 trial. Eligible patients with cT3/4aN+M0 locally advanced G/GEJ adenocarcinoma were screened, enrolled, and treated with 3 cycles of neoadjuvant tislelizumab and SOX followed by D2 gastrectomy and another 5 cycles of postoperative adjuvant SOX. The primary endpoint was major pathological response. Of the 49 included patients, 24 (49.0%) achieved major pathological response and 13 (26.5%) achieved pathological complete response. During a median follow-up of 26.8 months, the 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 69.4% and 81.2%, respectively. Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in six patients (12.2%) during the neoadjuvant period, eight patients (17.0%) during the postoperative period, and seven patients (15.2%) during the adjuvant period. Biomarker analysis revealed that the pathological complete response showed no association with 2-year PFS and OS. Major pathological response showed a potentially strong association with improved 2-year PFS and OS rates. In addition, preoperative circulating tumor cells combined with pathological responses are helpful in prognosis assessment. In addition, our results showed that T downstaging, lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio, and CD3+ T cells were independent factors that affect PFS. The signet ring cell component (SRCC), T downstaging, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio were independent factors affecting OS. Prognostic nomograms of PFS and OS constructed based on the multivariate Cox regression results demonstrated suitable calibration and discrimination ability. Neoadjuvant tislelizumab plus SOX exhibits promising efficacy and acceptable toxicity in patients with locally advanced G/GEJ adenocarcinoma. In addition, our study established a prognostic risk signature and nomograms based on clinicopathological characteristics, which can accurately predict patient outcomes and aid in personalized treatment planning.

RCHOP plus BTK Inhibitor Improves Clinical Outcomes in Double Expressor Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma, Unlike RCHOP plus Lenalidomide

BackgroundDouble-expressor diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DE-DLBCL) has a poor prognosis, and optimal treatment strategies remain unclear. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of RCHOP, R2-CHOP (RCHOP plus lenalidomide), and RCHOP plus Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase inhibitors (BTKi) in DE-DLBCL treatment. MethodsData from 213 DE-DLBCL patients treated from January 2019 and February 2024. Among them, 112 received R-CHOP, 65 received R2-CHOP, and 36 received R-CHOP plus BTKi. We evaluated clinical characteristics, overall response rate (ORR), complete response (CR) rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) for each groups. ResultsBaseline characteristics were comparable across groups. ORRs were 95.5% for R-CHOP, 96.9% for R2-CHOP, and 97.2% for R-CHOP plus BTKi, with CR rates of 76.5%, 80%, and 75%, respectively. BTKi significantly improved PFS (p=0.033) but not affect OS (p=0.165). Lenalidomide showed no benefit in PFS (p=0.153) or OS (p=0.351). With median follow-up times of 20.6 months for R-CHOP, 23.5 months for R2-CHOP, and 17.6 months for R-CHOP plus BTKi, the 1-year PFS rates were 73.6%, 82.2%, and 93.3%, and the 1-year OS rates were 96.2%, 93.2%, and 100%, respectively. Grade 3-4 adverse events included leukopenia, neutropenia, and anemia, and thrombocytopenia, with no significant differences among groups. ConclusionThe addition of BTK inhibitor enhances progression-free survival in DE-DLBCL, especially in advanced-stage patients, without introducing new severe adverse reactions. In contract, adding lenalidomide dose not does not offer additional efficacy or survival benefits.

Circulating Galectin-3: A Prognostic Biomarker in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Galectin-3 plays critical roles in the adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation of tumor cells. Recent data have suggested that galectin-3 plays a role in the development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); however, its prognostic value has not been validated. The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical and prognostic value of galectin-3 in patients with HCC. We prospectively enrolled and collected clinicopathologic data and serum samples from 767 patients with HCC between 2001 and 2014 at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. Two hundred patients without HCC were also enrolled and had data collected. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival (OS) distributions. The median OS in this cohort was 14.2 months (95% CI, 12-16.1). At the time of analysis, the 1-year OS rate was 45% (95% CI, 0.4-0.51) among patients with high galectin-3 levels and 59% (95% CI, 0.54-0.63) among patients with low galectin-3 levels. OS was significantly inferior in patients with high galectin-3 levels than in patients with lower galectin-3 levels (median OS: 10.12 vs. 16.49 months; p = 0.0022). Additionally, the multivariate model showed a significant association between high galectin-3 level and poor OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.249; 95% CI, 1.005-1.554). Comparison between low ( n = 464 patients) and high ( n = 302 patients) galectin-3 levels showed that mean serum galectin-3 levels were significantly higher in patients with HCC who had hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection ( p = 0.0001), higher Child-Pugh score (CPS) ( p = 0.0009), and higher Cancer of the Liver Italian Program (CLIP) score ( p = 0.0015). Our study shows that serum galectin-3 level is a valid prognostic biomarker candidate.

AI-based tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes scoring system for assessing HCC prognosis in patients undergoing liver resection

Background & AimsTumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), particularly CD8+ TILs, are key prognostic markers in many cancers. However, their prognostic value in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains controversial, with different evidence. Given the heterogeneous outcomes in HCC patients undergoing liver resection, this study aims to develop an AI-based system to quantify CD8+ TILs and assess their prognostic value for HCC patients. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective multicenter study on patients undergoing liver resection across three cohorts (N=514). We trained a deep neural network and a random forest model to segment tumor regions and locate CD8+ TILs in H&E and CD8-stained whole slide images (WSIs). We quantified CD8+ TIL density and established an Automated CD8+ Tumor-infiltrating Lymphocyte Scoring (ATLS-8) system to assess its prognostic value. ResultsIn discovery cohort, the 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 34.05% for ATLS-8 low-score and 65.03% for ATLS-8 high-score groups (HR 2.40; 95% CI, 1.37–4.19; P = 0.015). These findings were confirmed in validation cohort 1, which had 5-year OS rates of 28.57% and 68.73% (HR 3.38; 95% CI, 1.27–9.02; P = 0.0098), and validation cohort 2, which had 59.26% and 81.48% (HR 2.74; 95% CI, 1.05–7.15; P = 0.031). ATLS-8 improved prognostic model based on clinical variables (C-index 0.770 vs. 0.757; 0.769 vs. 0.727; 0.712 vs. 0.642 in three cohorts). ConclusionWe developed an automated system using CD8-stained WSIs to assess immune infiltration (ATLS-8). In HCC patients undergoing resection, higher CD8+ TIL density correlates with better OS, as per ATLS-8 assessment. This system is a promising tool for advancing clinical immune microenvironment assessment and outcome prediction. Impact and implicationCD8+ TILs have been identified as a prognostic factor associated with many cancers. In this study, CD8+ TILs were identified as an independent prognostic factor for OS in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who undergoing liver resection. Therefore, ATLS-8, a novel digital biomarker based on WSI-level CD8+ TILs, could play an important role in the prognostic assessment of HCC patients and could be integrated into clinicopathological models to participate in the decision-making and prognostic assessment of patients. The scoring system combined with artificial intelligence is essential for automated, quantitative, WSI- level assessment of TILs, which can be widely applied to quantify the immune profile of multi-cancer disease types with the discussion of subsequent immunotherapy. Clinical trial numberThis is a retrospective study and does not require a clinical trial number.

The Clinical Impact of the Systemic Immune-inflammation Index in Esophageal Cancer Patients Receiving Curative Treatment.

The systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) is a calculated biomarker developed to predict the prognosis of malignant tumors. This study evaluated the influence of the SII in patients with esophageal cancer (EC) who underwent curative resection. Patients who underwent radical esophagectomy and lymph node dissection for EC were enrolled. The SII was calculated as follows: neutrophil count (cell/mm3) × platelet count (cell/mm3 ×103)/lymphocyte count (cell/mm3). The SII, patient characteristics, overall survival (OS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were assessed. A total of 180 patients were included in this study. The cutoff value of the SII was set at 500 according to previous studies. Of the 180 patients, 100 were classified into the SII-high group and 80 into the SII-low group. The 3- and 5-year OS rates were 59.0% and 54.0%, respectively, in the SII-high group and 80.0% and 75.0%, respectively, in the SII-low group, showing significant differences between the groups (p=0.001). A multivariate analysis for the OS demonstrated that the SII was an independent prognostic factor (hazard ratio=2.333, 95% confidence interval=1.411-3.860, p<0.001), with similar results obtained for the RFS. Furthermore, hematological recurrence was significantly higher in the SII-high group than in the SII-low group (36.0% vs. 17.5%, p=0.006). The preoperative SII was an independent prognostic factor for OS and RFS in patients with EC who underwent curative resection. Thus, the SII can be a useful marker for the treatment and management of EC.

Outcomes After Palliative Radiotherapy in Patients with Symptomatic Locoregionally Advanced Breast Cancer.

Symptomatic locoregionally advanced breast cancer (SLABC) can cause troublesome pain or wound complications that negatively impact quality of life. Although palliative radiotherapy (RT) can minimize tumor-related symptoms, how best to tailor RT to achieve the most meaningful and durable response is not well defined. This is a single-institution, multi-site retrospective review of patients with SLABC treated between 2016 and 2023 with palliative RT to symptomatic disease in the breast, chest wall, and/or regional lymph node basins. Overall survival (OS), locoregional control (LC), clinical and radiographic treatment response, overall pain scores, and treatment-related toxicities were analyzed. 164 patients with a median age of 57 years were analyzed with a median follow-up time of 4.97 months. 86% had distant metastases. The most common presenting symptom was pain (87%), followed by ulcerating or fungating lesion (76%) and discharge (45%). The median cumulative biologically effective dose to the gross tumor volume (BEDGTV) was 69 Gy. The 1-year OS and LC rates were 37% and 63%, respectively. Eighty-one percent experienced improvement in symptoms within 3 months after RT, the odds of which increased per Gy BEDGTV (OR 1.029, p=0.003). Acute toxicities were associated with number of fractions and BEDGTV (both p<.001), but not with concurrent systemic therapy nor reirradiation (both p>.05). Trends in pain scores showed a significant change in pain trajectory that was sustained during the first year after RT. OS and LC were not different among patients who received 1 vs 2-10 vs >10 fractions, and between ≤70 vs >70 Gy BEDGTV. In this large series of patients with SLABC, palliative RT was effective at relieving locoregional symptoms with acceptable toxicity, with the likelihood of symptom improvement associated with radiation dose. Survival of these patients remains poor, highlighting the importance of palliative care strategies that minimize overall symptom burden while maximizing quality of life.

Establishment and Validation of a Prognostic Nomogram for Predicting Postoperative Overall Survival in Advanced Stage III-IV Colorectal Cancer Patients.

Most colorectal cancer (CRC) patients are at an advanced stage when they are first diagnosed. Risk factors for predicting overall survival (OS) in advanced stage CRC patients are crucial, and constructing a prognostic nomogram model is a scientific method for survival analysis. A total of 2956 advanced stage CRC patients were randomised into training and validation groups at a 7:3 ratio. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used to screen risk factors for OS and subsequently construct a prognostic nomogram model for predicting 1-, 3-, 5-, 8- and 10-year OS of advanced stage CRC patients. The performance of the model was demonstrated by the area under the curve (AUC) values, calibration curves and decision curve analysis (DCA). Kaplan-Meier curves were used to plot the survival probabilities for different strata of each risk factor. There was no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05) in the 32 clinical variables between patients in the training and validation groups. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses demonstrated that age, location, TNM, chemotherapy, liver metastasis, lung metastasis, MSH6, CEA, CA199, CA125 and CA724 were risk factors for OS. We estimated the AUC values for the nomogram model to predict 1-, 3-, 5-, 8- and 10-year OS, which in the training group were 0.826 (95% CI: 0.807-0.845), 0.836 (0.819-0.853), 0.839 (0.820-0.859), 0.835 (0.809-0.862) and 0.825 (0.779-0.870) respectively; in the validation group, the corresponding AUC values were 0.819 (0.786-0.852), 0.831 (0.804-0.858), 0.830 (0.799-0.861), 0.815 (0.774-0.857) and 0.802 (0.723-0.882) respectively. Finally, the 1-, 3-, 5-, 8- and 10-year OS rates for advanced stage CRC patients were 73.4 (71.8-75.0), 49.5 (47.8-51.4), 43.3 (41.5-45.2), 40.1 (38.1-41.9) and 38.6 (36.6-40.8) respectively. We constructed and validated an original nomogram for predicting the postoperative OS of advanced stage CRC patients, which can help facilitates physicians to accurately assess the individual survival of postoperative patients and identify high-risk patients.