5-year Locoregional Recurrence-free Survival Research Articles

Long-term follow-up and prognostic analysis of parotid tumors in children and adolescents.

The objective of this study is to summarize the clinical characteristics, treatment, and prognosis of parotid tumors in children and adolescents. Fifty-three children and adolescents diagnosed with parotid gland tumors were included. Survival was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank test and multivariate analysis were used to analyze the association between clinical factors and recurrence. Of the 53 patients, 30 cases were benign and 23 cases were malignant. All patients underwent surgery. Patients with malignant tumors with high-risk factors received radiotherapy or chemotherapy. The median follow-up time was 61 months. Of these, 1 patient with benign tumor and 5 patients with malignant tumors recurred. Of the patients with malignant tumors, 2 developed distant metastases and 2 died. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and 5-year locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS) rates for benign tumors were 100.0% and 92.9%, respectively, whereas the 5-year OS and 5-year LRFS rates for malignant tumors were 94.4% and 72.5%, respectively. The log-rank univariate test showed that tumor size >3.5 cm (p = .056), distant metastasis (p = .056), and stage III and IV (p = .032) were associated with recurrence. However, multivariate analysis did not show the above factors to be independent prognostic factors for LRFS. Surgery for benign tumors depends on the location and size. Surgery for malignant parotid tumors depends mainly on the stage, grade, pathological type, and recurrence. Prophylactic lymph node dissection is required for high-grade tumors. Radiotherapy or chemotherapy for children needs more research. Both benign and malignant tumors have high survival rates after active treatment. Level 2.

Is postmastectomy radiotherapy necessary for breast cancer patients with clinically node-positive downstaging to ypN0 after neoadjuvant chemotherapy?

The significance of postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) in breast cancer patients who initially have clinically node-positive (cN +) status but achieve downstaging to ypN0 following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) remains uncertain. This study aims to assess the impact of PMRT in this patient subset. Patients were enrolled from West China Hospital, Sichuan University from 2008 to 2019. Overall survival (OS), Locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and assessed with the log-rank test. The impact of PMRT was further analyzed by the Cox proportional hazards model. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to reduce the selection bias. Of the 333 eligible patients, 189 (56.8%) received PMRT, and 144 (43.2%) did not. At a median follow-up period of 71months, the five-year LRFS, DMFS, BCSS, and OS rates were 99.1%, 93.4%, 96.4%, and 94.3% for the entire cohort, respectively. Additionally, the 5-year LRFS, DMFS, BCSS, and OS rates were 98.9%, 93.8%, 96.7%, and 94.5% with PMRT and 99.2%, 91.3%, 94.9%, and 92.0% without PMRT, respectively (all p-values not statistically significant). After multivariate analysis, PMRT was not a significant risk factor for any of the endpoints. When further stratified by stage, PMRT did not show any survival benefit for patients with stage II-III diseases. In the context of comprehensive treatments, PMRT might be exempted in ypN0 breast cancer patients. Further large-scale, randomized controlled studies are required to investigate the significance of PMRT in this patient subset.

Prognostic Significance of Bulky Nodal Disease in Anal Cancer Management: A Multi Institutional Study.

This study aimed to assess the prognostic significance of bulky nodal involvement in patients with anal squamous cell carcinoma treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy. We retrospectively analyzed medical records of patients diagnosed with anal squamous cell carcinoma who underwent definitive chemoradiotherapy at three medical centers between 2004 and 2021. Exclusion criteria included distant metastasis at diagnosis, 2D radiotherapy, and salvage treatment for local relapse. Bulky N+ was defined as nodes with a long diameter of 2 cm or greater. A total of 104 patients were included, comprising 51 with N0, 46 with non-bulky N+, and 7 with bulky N+. The median follow-up duration was 54.0 months (range, 6.4-162.2 months). Estimated 5-year progression-free survival (PFS), loco-regional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS), and overall survival (OS) rates for patients with bulky N+ were 42.9%, 42.9%, and 47.6%, respectively. Bulky N+ was significantly associated with inferior PFS, LRRFS and OS compared to patients without or with non-bulky N+, even after multivariate analysis. We proposed a new staging system incorporating bulky N+ as N2 stage, with estimated 5-year LRRFS, PFS, and OS rates of 81.1%, 80.6%, and 86.2% for stage I, 67.7%, 60.9%, and 93.3% for stage II, and 42.9%, 42.9%, and 47.6% for stage III disease, enhancing the predictability of prognosis. Patients with bulky nodal disease treated with standard chemoradiotherapy experienced poor survival outcomes, indicating the potential necessity for further treatment intensification.

Impact of adaptive radiotherapy on survival in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

To investigate the clinical significance of adaptive radiotherapy (ART) in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Eligible patients were treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy using IMRT. Planning computed tomography in ART was performed during radiotherapy, and replanning was performed. Since ART was started in May 2011 (ART group), patients who were treated without ART up to April 2011 (non-ART group) were used as the historical control. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate overall survival (OS), locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). LRFS for the primary tumor (LRFS_P) and regional lymph node (LRFS_LN) were also studied for more detailed analysis. Statistical significance was evaluated using the log-rank test for survival. The ART group tended to have higher radiation doses. The median follow-up period was 127 months (range, 10 to 211 months) in the non-ART group and 61.5 months (range, 5 to 129 months) in the ART group. Compared to the non-ART group, the ART group showed significantly higher 5-year PFS (53.8% vs. 81.3%, p = 0.015) and LRFS (61.2% vs. 85.3%, p = 0.024), but not OS (80.7% vs. 80.8%, p = 0.941) and DMFS (84.6% vs. 92.7%, p = 0.255). Five-year LRFS_P was higher in the ART group (61.3% vs. 90.6%, p = 0.005), but LRFS_LN did not show a significant difference (91.9% vs. 96.2%, p = 0.541). Although there were differences in the patient backgrounds between the two groups, this study suggests the potential effectiveness of ART in improving locoregional control, especially in the primary tumor.

Pretreatment Circulating HPV16 DNA Viral Load Predicts Risk of Distant Metastasis in Patients with HPV16-Positive Oropharyngeal Cancer.

There are definite reasons to implement molecular diagnostics based on the measurement of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA in liquid biopsy into clinical practice. It is a quick, repeatable, and health-safe test for cancer biomarkers in the blood. In this study, we investigated whether the circulating tumor-related HPV16 (ctHPV16) viral load (VL) in patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) was important for determining the risk of locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), and overall survival (OS). This study included 91 patients with ctHPV16-positive OPSCC who had been treated with radical radiotherapy and chemotherapy. The VL was measured using quantitative PCR (qPCR) and a probe specific for HPV16. Based on 10 years of follow-up, the 2-, 3-, 5-, and 9-year LRFS, MFS, and OS were estimated. The 5-year actuarial LRFS, MFS, and OS rates of patients with ctHPV16-positive/OPSCC were 88%, 90%, and 81%, respectively. The VL was significantly higher in patients who subsequently developed distant metastases (DM) than in those who did not (VL 4.09 vs. 3.25; p = 0.009). In a Cox proportional hazards regression model for MFS, a higher ctHPV16 VL appeared to be a significant independent prognostic factor for the occurrence of DM (HR 2.22, p = 0.015). The ROC curve revealed a cutoff value of 3.556 for VL (p = 0.00001). A high VL before treatment indicates patients with a significant risk of DM, and should be used in OPSCC treatment stratification.

Adult head and neck rhabdomyosarcoma: radiotherapy- based treatment, outcomes, and predictors of survival

BackgroundAdult head and neck rhabdomyosarcoma (HNRMS) is an exceptionally rare malignancy, and there is a paucity of data and research dedicated to understanding its characteristics and management in adult populations. This study aimed to assess the outcomes and identify survival predictors in adult HNRMS.MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated 42 adult patients (> 16 years) with HNRMS who received radiotherapy (RT)-based treatment at our institute between 2008 and 2022. We analysed the clinical characteristics and prognosis of these patients, including the locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS), using the Kaplan–Meier method. The chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests were used to analyse differences between groups for dichotomous and categorical variables, respectively. Survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Prognostic variables were assessed through univariate Cox analyses.ResultsThe median patient age was 28 years (range, 16–82 years). Alveolar RMS was the most common histological type, observed in 21 patients (50.0%), followed by embryonal in 16 patients (38.1%). The anatomic sites of origin were orbital in one (2.4%), parameningeal in 26 (61.9%), and non-orbital/non-parameningeal in 15 (35.7%) patients. Nineteen patients (45.2%) had regional lymph node metastasis, and five patients (11.9%) presented with distant metastatic disease. Distant metastasis (n = 17) was the primary cause of treatment failure. At a median follow-up of 47.0 months, the 5-year LRFS, PFS, and OS rates were 69.0%, 39.7%, and 41.0%, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that tumour size, lymph node involvement, and the local treatment pattern (surgery and RT vs. RT alone) were significant predictors of survival.ConclusionsThe main failure pattern in patients with HNRMS receiving RT-based treatment was distant metastasis. Tumour size > 5 cm and lymph node involvement were predictors of worse LRFS. Multimodality local treatment, combining surgery and RT, is effective and provides survival benefits.

Clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors in invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast.

Invasive micropapillary carcinoma (IMPC) treatment only relies on the standard treatment of nonspecific invasive breast cancer (NSIBC), and it remains controversial whether the survival of patients improves. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze the clinicopathological features of IMPC and to investigate the factors affecting its prognosis. This retrospective cohort study included 104 IMPC patients who met the study's inclusion criteria out of a total of 4,532 patients with invasive breast cancer between January 2015 and December 2019. A contemporaneous cohort of 230 patients with non-specific invasive breast cancer (NSIBC) who underwent surgery was identified and matched using propensity scores. The survival rate for patients with IMPC ranged from 1.12% to 7.03%. Statistically significant differences were observed in the proportion of endocrine treatment, lymphatic invasion, estrogen receptor (ER)-positive rate, molecular subtypes, molecular typing, and 5-year loco-regional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS) between the two cohorts (p < 0.05). The univariate analysis showed that T stage, N stage, lymphatic invasion, vascular invasion, ER-positive rate, and progesterone receptor (PR)-negative rate were all prognosis risk factors (p < 0.05) for IMPC. Furthermore, the multivariate analysis indicated that lymphatic invasion and N stage were independent prognostic factors (p < 0.05). The incidence of micropapillary IMPC, among other pathological subtypes, is steadily increasing. ER-positive and PR-positive rates, as well as luminal subtypes, are frequent, with a concurrent increase in the 5-year locoregional recurrence rate. It would be interesting to compare the effect following these therapeutic modifications in larger cohorts in future studies.

Oncologic Outcomes of Immediate Breast Reconstruction in the Setting of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Long-term Follow-up Study of a Matched Cohort.

Despite the increasing use of immediate breast reconstruction (IBR), its oncologic safety in the setting of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) needs to be comprehensively clarified in breast cancer management. The objective of the present study was to analyze the oncologic safety of IBR following NACT. In total, 587 patients with breast cancer who underwent a total mastectomy (TM) with IBR after NACT between 2008 and 2017 at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. The reviewed patients with IBR following skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) or nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) were matched 1:3 to patients who underwent TM alone after NACT. Matching variables included age, clinical T and N stages before NACT, response to NACT, pathologic T and N stages, and molecular subtypes. After propensity score matching, 95 patients who underwent IBR following SSM/NSM after NACT (IBR group) and 228 patients who underwent TM alone after NACT (TM group) were selected. The median follow-up period was 73 (range, 5-181) months after matching. After matching, there were no significant differences between the two groups in 5-year locoregional recurrence-free survival (88.8% vs. 91.2%, p = 0.516), disease-free survival (67.3% vs. 76.6%, p = 0.099), distant metastasis-free survival (71.9% vs. 81.9%, p = 0.057), or overall survival (84.1% vs. 91.5, p = 0.061) rates. In multivariate analyses, conducting IBR was not associated with increased risks for locoregional recurrence, any recurrence, distant metastasis, or overall death. Our findings suggest that IBR following SSM/NSM elicits comparable long-term oncologic outcomes to those of TM alone in the setting of NACT.

Phase 2 Clinical Trial of Simultaneous Boost Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy With 3 Dose Gradients in Patients With Stage I-II Nasal Type Natural Killer/T-Cell Lymphoma: Long-Term Outcomes of Survival and Quality of Life

The aim of this study was to investigate the treatment results and long-term quality of life in patients with early-stage extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma who were prospectively treated with simultaneous boost intensity modulated radiation therapy (SIB-IMRT) with 3 dose gradients. Sixty patients with stage I-II nasal cavity natural killer/T-cell lymphoma (NKTCL) and Waldeyer's ring NKTCL were enrolled in a single-arm, prospective, phase 2 clinical trial from August 2011 to April 2015. All patients were treated with definitive radiation therapy combined with short-course induction chemotherapy. A newly designed SIB-IMRT scheme was uniformly adopted, with 54.6 Gy for the gross tumor volume (GTV) of the primary tumor and GTV of the positive lymph nodes, 50.7 Gy for the high-risk clinical target volume (CTV), and 45.5 Gy for the low-risk CTV, all delivered in 26 daily fractions. Before SIB-IMRT, L-asparaginase-based induction chemotherapy was used in 95.0% (57/60) of patients. With a median follow-up time of 95.8 months, the 5-year locoregional recurrence-free survival, progression-free survival, and overall survival rates were 83.3%, 81.7%, and 88.3%, respectively. Dosimetric analysis in the first 21 patients showed satisfying conformality for planning target volume of GTV, high-risk CTV, and low-risk CTV, while the organs at risk were well protected. The results of long-term quality-of-life investigations in patients without progression were favorable, and nasal discomfort was the most common symptom. No grade 3 or 4 acute or late toxicities were observed. The scheme of target volume delineation and dose setting that we designed has favorable clinical effects with mild side effects in treating patients with stage I-II nasal cavity NKTCL and Waldeyer's ring NKTCL.

Postmastectomy Radiation in HER-2 Positive Breast Cancer after Neoadjuvant Therapy: Secondary Analysis of Two Randomized Trials

The role of postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) following primary systemic therapy (PST) in HER-2 positive breast cancer (Her2+BC) remains poorly understood. The current study evaluates PMRT based on the pathological response to PST in Her2+BC. TRYPHAENA and NeoSphere are randomized phase II trials that investigated PST for Her2+BC. Our study is a pooled analysis of both trials, including 312 node-positive patients treated with HER-2 targeted PST followed by mastectomy with or without PMRT. The primary endpoint is loco-regional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS). Our analysis included 172 (55%) patients who achieved nodal pCR and 140 (45%) patients who did not. Patients with nodal pCR had a 5-year LRRFS of 97% with PMRT delivered in 98 patients (57%). Patients without nodal pCR had a 5-year LRRFS of 87% with PMRT delivered in 93 patients (66%). Patients with ypN1 (n = 62) disease who received PMRT (n = 40) had a 5-year LRRFS of 85% as compared to 89% in those who did not (n = 22); (p = 0.60). A significant LRRFS difference was noted in patients with ypN2-3 (n = 78) disease who received PMRT (n = 53) compared to those who did not (n = 25) (5-year LRRFS 92% vs. 75%; p = 0.019). On multivariate analysis, clinical nodal disease at diagnosis and nodal pCR were significantly associated with loco-regional recurrence (LRR). Her2+BC patients who achieve nodal pCR after PST have excellent loco-regional control which supports de-escalation of PMRT.

Comparison of different laryngeal preservation strategies based on chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced hypopharyngeal carcinoma

Objective:This study aimed to evaluate the clinical features and treatment outcomes of the value of response-adapted treatment following radiotherapy and induction chemotherapy follwing subsequent comprehensive therapy in patients with resectable locally advanced hypopharyngeal carcinoma. Methods:This cohort study was conducted from September 2010 to September 2020 in our hospital, 231 patients pathologically confirmed stage Ⅲ and ⅣB resectable locally advanced hypopharyngeal carcinoma included. For the IC-directed ART strategy, IC is used to select good candidates to receive radical RT or CCRT, and others undergo surgery. He response-adapted strategy was determined based on the primary tumor response, which was evaluated at a dose of 50 Gy. If the response reached complete response or partial response（more than 80% tumor regression）, patients received radical RT or CCRT; otherwise, they received surgery, if possible, at 4 to 6 weeks after RT. The end points of the study were OS（overall survival）, progression free survival（PFS）, locoregional recurrence-free survival（LRRFS） and LDFS. Results:In IC-directed group, 75.0%（57/76） patients reached PR after 2 cycles of induction chemotherapy. While in RT-directed group, 70.3%（109/155） patients reached large PR at dose of 50 Gy. The median interquartile range follow-up period of the whole cohort was 63.8 months. The 5-year OS, PFS, LRRFS and SFL of the whole cohort were 47.9%、39.6%、44.3% and 36.2%, respectively. In evaluations based on the different treatment strategies, the 5-year OS and SFL were 51.3% versus 37.0%（HR 0.67; 95%CI 0.43-1.05; P=0.07） and 27.8% versus 39.8%（HR 0.68; 95%CI 0.46-0.99; P=0.04） between IC-directed and RT-directed groups. In additional, surgery complications did not significantly differ between these two groups. Conclusion:In this cohort study, the response-adapted strategy based on an early RT response facilitated better treatment tailoring, and higher laryngeal preservation compared with IC-directed strategies. This approach could provide a feasible laryngeal preservation strategy in patients with resectable locally advanced hypopharyngeal carcinoma.

Survival and Trends in Annualized Hazard Function by Age at Diagnosis Among Chinese Breast Cancer Patients Aged ≤40 Years: Case Analysis Study

Background Young breast cancer patients are more likely to develop aggressive tumor characteristics and a worse prognosis than older women, and different races and ethnicities have distinct epidemiologies and prognoses. However, few studies have evaluated the clinical biological features and relapse patterns in different age strata of young women in Asia. Objective We aimed to explore survival differences and the hazard function in young Chinese patients with breast cancer (BC) by age. Methods The patients were enrolled from West China Hospital, Sichuan University. The chi-squared test, a Kaplan-Meier analysis, a log-rank test, a Cox multivariate hazards regression model, and a hazard function were applied for data analysis. Locoregional recurrence–free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis–free survival (DMFS), breast cancer–specific survival (BCSS), and overall survival (OS) were defined as end points. Results We included 1928 young BC patients diagnosed between 2008 and 2019. Patients aged 18 to 25, 26 to 30, 31 to 35, and 36 to 40 years accounted for 2.7% (n=53), 11.8% (n=228), 27.7% (n=535), and 57.7% (n=1112) of the patients, respectively. The diagnosis of young BC significantly increased from 2008 to 2019. Five-year LRFS, DMFS, BCSS, and OS for the entire population were 98.3%, 93.4%, 94.4%, and 94%, respectively. Patients aged 18 to 25 years had significantly poorer 5-year LRFS (P&lt;.001), 5-year DMFS (P&lt;.001), 5-year BCSS (P=.04), and 5-year OS (P=.04) than those aged 31 to 35, 26 to 30, and 36 to 40 years. The hazard curves for recurrence and metastasis for the whole cohort continuously increased over the years, while the BC mortality risk peaked at 2 to 3 years and then slowly decreased. When stratified by age, the annualized hazard function for recurrence, metastasis, and BC mortality in different age strata showed significantly different trends, especially for BC mortality. Conclusions The annual diagnosis of young BC seemed to increase in Chinese patients, and the distinct age strata of young BC patients did not differ in survival outcome or failure pattern. Our results might provide strategies for personalized management of young BC.

Postoperative radiotherapy alone is as effective as postoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with pT4aN0 gingival cancer with negative surgical margins.

This study compared the survival outcomes following postoperative chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) and postoperative radiotherapy (RT) alone for patients with gingival cancer with negative surgical margins and only bone invasion. Of the 2579 gingival cancer cases reviewed from 2002 to 2018, 156 were enrolled in the study (CCRT: 63 patients; RT: 93 patients). The primary endpoints were the impact of adjuvant treatment (RT vs. CCRT) on overall survival (OS), locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). Subgroup analyses were conducted based on surgical margins (<5 mm vs.≥5mm) and different adjuvant treatments (RT vs. CCRT). Median follow-up time, age, and invasion depth were 88.5months, 57years, and 14mm, respectively. More patients undergoing adjuvant CCRT had surgical margins<5mm (47.6% vs. 21.5%, p<0.01) than those undergoing RT. No significant difference was observed in the 5-year OS, LRRFS, and DMFS of patients undergoing adjuvant RT and CCRT. Although adjuvant RT alone and CCRT provided similar local control for patients with surgical margins≥5mm, worse LRRFS trends were observed in patients with surgical margins<5mm (hazards ratio, 6.15, 95% confidence interval 0.92-41.13, p=0.06). Postoperative RT alone may be effective for patients with gingival cancer with negative surgical margins (≥5 mm) and only bone invasion, while postoperative CCRT may result in better LRRFS than RT alone for patients with surgical margins<5mm.

Response-adapted therapy for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma based on clinical response and circulating Epstein-Barr virus DNA level post induction chemotherapy.

TPS6112 Background: For locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), the mainstay treatment is cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT). Recent phase III clinical trials have demonstrated that induction chemotherapy (ICT) plus CCRT, compared with CCRT alone, further improved progression-free survival (PFS). However, not every patient has good response to ICT. Evidence has accumulated that those with poor response to ICT, or those with detectable Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) DNA post ICT, correlated with poorer PFS. In addition, real-time monitoring of plasma EBV DNA response adds prognostic information, and has the potential utility for risk-adapted treatment intensification in NPC. The aim of this study is to clarify whether response-adapted strategy based on clinical efficacy and EBV DNA response confers survival benefit to patients with locally advanced NPC. Methods: This is an open-label, 3-arm, phase II study. Patients with pathologically confirmed, locally advanced NPC (III-IVA, excluding T3N0M0, 8th AJCC staging system), with pretreatment detectable plasma EBV DNA level and ECOS PS 0-1 were eligible. Patients will receive one cycle of GP-based ICT. After one cycle of ICT, plasma EBV DNA and head and neck MR are performed. Based on clinical efficacy (evaluated per RECIST 1.1 criteria) and changes of plasma EBV DNA after one cycle, patients will be divided into three arms. Patients with good response (Arm A: Early Responders, undetectable EBV DNA level and CR/PR) will directly receive CCRT. Patients with intermediate response (Arm B: Intermediate Responders, detectable EBV DNA and CR/PR/decreased SD; or undetectable EBV DNA yet without CR/PR) will be randomized to experiment subgroup (GP combined with Toripalimab for two additional cycles then CCRT and maintenance Toripalimab treatment) and standard subgroup (GP for two additional cycles then CCRT). Patients with poor response (Arm C: Treatment Resistant, increased EBV DNA level, or PD/enlarged SD) will be switched to TP regimen combined with Toripalimab, followed by CCRT and maintenance Toripalimab treatment. Sample size calculation is based on 2-year PFS rate for arm B as the primary endpoint (one-sided α = 0.10, power = 0.80). Our target sample size is estimated to be 198-240, among them 168 for arm B. Secondary endpoints include adverse events determined by CTCAE v5.0, ORR at 3 months post-CRT, 2-year locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS) rate, 2-year distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) rate, 2-year overall survival (OS) rate, as well as quality of Life for arm B. Exploratory endpoints include 2-year PFS rate, LRFS rate, DMFS rate, OS rate, ORR at 3 months post-CRT, adverse effects, and quality of life for arm A and arm C. This trial opened to accrual in July 2022 and the recruitment is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT05628922 .

Oncologic safety of breast conservation following NACT in women with locally advanced breast cancer.

Breast conservation surgery (BCS) is the accepted standard of treatment for early breast cancer, with evidence from randomized controlled and population-based studies. The oncological outcome of BCS in locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) is mainly available from retrospective series with a small sample size and a shorter follow-up duration. A retrospective observational study of 411 non-metastatic LABC patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by surgery from 2011 to 2016. We retrieved the data from a prospectively maintained database and electronic medical records. Survival data were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences 25 and STATA 14. 146/411 (35.5%) women had BCS with a margin positivity rate of 3.42%. With a median follow-up of 64 months (IQR 61, 66), the local relapse rate was 8.9% in BCS and 8.3% after mastectomy. The estimated 5-year locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS) and overall survival (OS) rates of BCS were 86.9%, 63.9%, 71% and 79.3%, and 90.1%, 57.9%, 58.3% and 71.5% in the mastectomy group. On univariate analysis, BCS showed superior survival outcomes compared to mastectomy (unadjusted HR (95% CI) for RFS: 0.70 (0.50-1), DDFS: 0.57 (0.39-0.84), OS: 0.58 (0.36-0.93)). After adjusting for age, cT stage, cN stage, poorer chemotherapy response (ypT0/is, N0) and radiotherapy, BCS and mastectomy groups were found comparable in terms of LRFS (HR: 1.1, 0.53-2.3), DDFS (HR: 0.67, 0.45-1.01), RFS (HR: 0.80, 0.55-1.17) and OS (HR: 0.69, 0.41-1.14). BCS is technically feasible in LABC patients. LABC patients who respond well to NACT can be offered BCS without compromising survival outcomes.

Cisplatin-docetaxel induction chemotherapy for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma in a non-endemic cohort

This is the report on our clinic’s 15 years of experience (2004–2018) on nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), treated with induction chemotherapy (IC) and subsequent concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), comprising population characteristics and treatment outcomes of 203 patients with non-metastatic NPC. IC comprised docetaxel (75 mg/m2) and cisplatin (75 mg/m2) combination (TP). Concurrent cisplatin (P) was applied either weekly (40 mg/m2, 32 cases) or every-3-week (100 mg/m2, 171 cases). The median follow-up duration was 85 months (range, 5–204 months). Overall and distant failure rates were observed in 27.1% (n = 55) and 13.8% (n = 28) patients, respectively. The 5-year locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) rates were 84.1%, 86.4%, 75%, and 78.7% respectively. The overall stage was an independent prognostic factor for the LRRFS, DMFS, DFS, and OS. The WHO histological type was a prognostic factor for the LRRFS, DFS, and OS. Age was a prognostic factor for the DMFS, DFS, and OS. Concurrent P schedule was independent prognostic only the LRRFS.

Study Protocol of the Bladder Adjuvant RadioTherapy (BART) Trial: A Randomised Phase III Trial of Adjuvant Radiotherapy Following Cystectomy in Bladder Cancer

AimsTo assess the efficacy and safety of adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with high-risk muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) following radical cystectomy (RC) and chemotherapy. Materials and methodsThe BART (Bladder Adjuvant RadioTherapy) trial is an ongoing multicentric, randomised, phase III trial comparing the efficacy and safety of adjuvant radiotherapy versus observation in patients with high-risk MIBC. The key eligibility criteria include ≥pT3, node-positive (pN+), positive margins and/or nodal yield <10, or, neoadjuvant chemotherapy for cT3/T4/N+ disease. In total, 153 patients will be accrued and randomised, in a 1:1 ratio, to either observation (standard arm) or adjuvant radiotherapy (test arm) following surgery and chemotherapy. Stratification parameters include nodal status (N+ versus N0) and chemotherapy (neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus adjuvant chemotherapy versus no chemotherapy). For patients in the test arm, adjuvant radiotherapy to cystectomy bed and pelvic nodes is planned with intensity-modulated radiotherapy to a dose of 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions using daily image guidance. All patients will follow-up with 3-monthly clinical review and urine cytology for 2 years and subsequently 6 monthly until 5 years, with contrast-enhanced computed tomography abdomen pelvis 6 monthly for 2 years and annually until 5 years. Physician-scored toxicity using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0 and patient-reported quality of life using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Colorectal questionnaire is recorded pre-treatment and at follow-up. Endpoints and statisticsThe primary endpoint is 2-year locoregional recurrence-free survival. The sample size calculation was based on the estimated improvement in 2-year locoregional recurrence-free survival from 70% in the standard arm to 85% in the test arm (hazard ratio 0.45) using 80% statistical power and a two-sided alpha error of 0.05. Secondary endpoints include disease-free survival, overall survival, acute and late toxicity, patterns of failure and quality of life. ConclusionThe BART trial aims to evaluate whether contemporary radiotherapy after standard-of-care surgery and chemotherapy reduces pelvic recurrences safely and also potentially affects survival in high-risk MIBC.

Post-mastectomy radiation therapy in HER-2 positive breast cancer after primary systemic therapy: Pooled analysis of TRYPHAENA and NeoSphere trials

PurposeThe role of post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) following primary systemic therapy (PST) in HER-2 positive breast cancer (Her2 + BC) remains poorly understood. The current study evaluates PMRT based on the pathological response to PST in Her2 + BC. Methods and materialsTRYPHAENA and NeoSphere are randomized phase II trials that investigated PST for Her2 + BC. Our study is a pooled analysis of both trials, including 312 node-positive patients treated with HER-2 targeted PST followed by mastectomy with or without PMRT. The primary endpoint is loco-regional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS). ResultsOur analysis included 172 (55%) patients who achieved complete nodal pathological response (ypN0) and 140 (45%) patients who did not. Patients with ypN0 had a 5-year LRRFS of 97% in both, the PMRT and no PMRT, groups (p = 0.94). Patients with ypN + had 5-year LRRFS of 89% in the PMRT group and 82% in the no PMRT group (p = 0.17). Patients with ypN1 (n = 62) disease who received PMRT (n = 40) had a 5-year LRRFS of 85% as compared to 89% in those who did not (n = 22); (p = 0.60). A significant LRRFS difference was noted in patients with ypN2-3 (n = 78) disease who received PMRT (n = 53) compared to those who did not (n = 25) (5-year LRRFS 92% vs. 75%; p = 0.019). On multivariate analysis, clinical nodal disease at diagnosis and ypN0 were significantly associated with loco-regional recurrence (LRR). ConclusionsHer2 + BC patients who achieve ypN0 after PST have excellent locoregional-control which supports de-escalation of PMRT. In contrast, patients with ypN2-3 disease derive significant benefit from PMRT. Clinical nodal stage at presentation and ypN0 status are significantly associated with LRR risk in Her2 + BC.

Can adjuvant radiotherapy be omitted for oral cavity cancer patients who received neoadjuvant therapy and surgery? A retrospective cohort study.

Surgery and postoperative adjuvant therapy comprise the standard treatment for locally advanced resectable oral squamous cell carcinoma (LAROSCC), while preoperative neoadjuvant therapy is being explored without sufficient confirmation of improved survival. De-escalation regimens after neoadjuvant therapy, such as those omitting adjuvant radiotherapy, may provide comparable or better outcomes, suggesting rigorous assessment of adjuvant therapy outcomes is needed in LAROSCC patients. The authors thus performed this retrospective study in LAROSCC patients who received neoadjuvant therapy and surgery, to compare the outcomes for overall survival (OS) and locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS) between the adjuvant radiotherapy (radio) and nonradiotherapy (nonradio) cohorts. Patients diagnosed with LAROSCC who received neoadjuvant therapy and surgery were enrolled and divided into radio and nonradio cohorts to determine whether adjuvant radiotherapy could be omitted after neoadjuvant therapy and surgery. From 2008 to 2021, 192 patients were enrolled. No significant differences were found in OS or LRFS between the radio and nonradio patient cohorts. The 10-year estimated OS rates were 58.9 versus 44.1% in radio versus nonradio cohorts, while 10-year estimated LRFS rates were 55.4 versus 48.2%, respectively. For clinical stage III patients, 10-year OS rates were 62.3 versus 62.6% (radio vs. nonradio), and estimated 10-year LRFS rates were 56.5 versus 60.7% (radio vs. nonradio). Multivariate Cox regression modeling of postoperative variables showed pathologic response of primary tumor and pathologic regional lymph nodes staging were associated with survival, while the adjuvant radiotherapy exposure was not included in the model due to nonsignificance. These findings support further prospective evaluation of adjuvant radiotherapy omission, and suggest that de-escalation trials are warranted for LAROSCC surgery patients who received neoadjuvant therapy.

Impact of Microscopically Positive (≤1 mm) Distal Margins on Disease Recurrence in Rectal Cancer Treated by Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy

The adequate distal resection margin is still controversial in rectal cancer treated by neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). The aim of this study was to assess the impact of a distal margin of ≤1 mm on locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS). Among 255 patients treated with nCRT and surgery at the National Cancer Institute of Milan, 83 (32.5%) had a distal margin of ≤1 mm and 172 (67.5%) had a distal margin of >1 mm. Survival analyses were performed to assess the impact of distal margin on 5-year LRRFS, as well as Cox survival analysis. The role of distal margin on survival was analyzed according to different tumor regression grades (TRGs). The overall 5-year LRRFS rate was 77.6% with a distal margin of ≤1 mm vs. 88.3% with a distal margin of >1 mm (Log-rank p = 0.09). Only stage ypT4 was an independent predictor of worse LRRFS (HR 15.14, p = 0.026). The 5-year LRRFS was significantly lower in TRG3-5 patients with a distal margin of ≤1 mm compared to those with a distal margin of >1 mm (68.5% vs. 84.2%, p = 0.027), while no difference was observed in case of TRG1-2 (p = 0.77). Low-responder rectal cancers after nCRT still require a distal margin of >1 mm to reduce the high likelihood of local relapse.