5-year Distant Metastasis-free Survival Research Articles

A novel fully automatic segmentation and counting system for metastatic lymph nodes on multimodal magnetic resonance imaging: Evaluation and prognostic implications in nasopharyngeal carcinoma

BackgroundThe number of metastatic lymph nodes (MLNs) is crucial for the survival of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), but manual counting is laborious. This study aims to explore the feasibility and prognostic value of automatic MLNs segmentation and counting. MethodsWe retrospectively enrolled 980 newly diagnosed patients in the primary cohort and 224 patients from two external cohorts. We utilized the nnUnet model for automatic MLNs segmentation on multimodal magnetic resonance imaging. MLNs counting methods, including manual delineation-assisted counting (MDAC) and fully automatic lymph node counting system (AMLNC), were compared with manual evaluation (Gold standard). ResultsIn the internal validation group, the MLNs segmentation results showed acceptable agreement with manual delineation, with a mean Dice coefficient of 0.771. The consistency among three counting methods was as follows 0.778 (Gold vs. AMLNC), 0.638 (Gold vs. MDAC), and 0.739 (AMLNC vs. MDAC). MLNs numbers were categorized into three-category variable (1–4, 5–9, > 9) and two-category variable (<4, ≥ 4) based on the gold standard and AMLNC. These categorical variables demonstrated acceptable discriminating abilities for 5-year overall survival (OS), progression-free, and distant metastasis-free survival. Compared with base prediction model, the model incorporating two-category AMLNC-counting numbers showed improved C-indexes for 5-year OS prediction (0.658 vs. 0.675, P = 0.045). All results have been successfully validated in the external cohort. ConclusionsThe AMLNC system offers a time- and labor-saving approach for fully automatic MLNs segmentation and counting in NPC. MLNs counting using AMLNC demonstrated non-inferior performance in survival discrimination compared to manual detection.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with stage IIB cervical squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study

PurposeThis study aims to compare treatment outcomes between neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by surgery and concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in patients with stage IIB cervical squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC).Materials and methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study involving patients with stage IIB CSCC treated at Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital between June 2012 and June 2019. We compared overall survival (OS), locoregional-free survival (LRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) between the NACT + surgery and CCRT groups.ResultsA total of 257 patients were enrolled: 165 underwent NACT + surgery and 92 received CCRT. Before propensity score matching, the NACT + surgery group exhibited lower 5-year OS (68.2% vs. 85.6%; hazard ratio [HR] = 2.50, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.26–4.96; P = 0.009), LRFS (85.2% vs. 96.9%; HR = 5.88, 95% CI: 1.33–25.94; P = 0.019), and DMFS (81.9% vs. 97.4%; HR = 6.65, 95% CI: 1.51–29.23; P = 0.012) compared to the CCRT group. After propensity score matching, OS, LRFS, and DMFS remained worse in the NACT + surgery group compared to the CCRT group.ConclusionNACT followed by surgery is associated with decreased OS, LRFS, and DMFS compared to CCRT among patients with stage IIB CSCC.

Long-term prospective outcome data using EndoPredict as risk stratification and chemotherapy decision biomarker in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer

Abstract Purpose To report the prospective long-term outcome data of patients whose chemotherapy decision was guided by the EndoPredict test. Methods Patients with hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative early breast cancer with 0–3 positive lymph nodes were enrolled. The EndoPredict test was carried out on all tumor samples. Treatment compliance, local recurrence, distant metastases, and survival were evaluated. Associations of EPclin risk stratification with 5-year disease-free survival and distant metastasis-free survival were evaluated by time-to-event analysis. Results 368 consecutive patients were included in the analysis. Median follow-up was 8.2 years. EndoPredict allocated 238 (65%) in the low-risk and 130 (35%) patients in the high-risk group. Risk for disease recurrence or death in EPclin high-risk patients was twofold higher than in EPclin low-risk patients (hazard ratio [HR] 2.08; 95% CI 1.26–3.44; p = 0.004). EPclin low-risk patients had a 5-year disease-free survival of 95.3% (95% CI 92.6–98.0%). EPclin high-risk patients were at higher risk of developing distant metastases or death (HR 2.21; 95% CI 1.27–3.88; p = 0.005). EPclin high-risk patients who underwent chemotherapy had a 5-year DFS of 89.1% (95% CI 82.7–96.1%) in contrast to high-risk patients without chemotherapy (68.9%; 95% CI 56.2–84.5%; HR 0.46; 95% CI 0.23–0.95; p = 0.036). EPclin high-risk patients were at higher risk of experiencing distant metastases or death than EPclin low-risk patients regardless of menopausal status (premenopausal: HR 3.55; 95% CI 1.17–12.32; p = 0.025; postmenopausal: HR 1.92; 95% CI 0.99–3.7; p = 0.054). Conclusion EndoPredict can guide decisions on adjuvant chemotherapy in early luminal breast cancer. EndoPredict risk stratification is also applicable in premenopausal women.

Simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy post breast-conserving surgery: clinical efficacy, adverse effects, and cosmetic outcomes in breast cancer patients

BackgroundSimultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy (SIB-IMRT) is an innovative technique delivering a higher dose to the tumor bed while irradiating the entire breast. This study aims to assess the clinical outcomes, adverse effects, and cosmetic results of SIB-IMRT following breast-conserving surgery in breast cancer patients.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of 308 patients with stage 0–III breast cancer who underwent breast-conserving surgery and SIB-IMRT from January 2016 to December 2020. The prescribed doses included 1.85 Gy/27 fractions to the whole breast and 2.22 Gy/27 fractions or 2.20 Gy/27 fractions to the tumor bed. Primary endpoints included overall survival (OS), local–regional control (LRC), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), acute and late toxicities, and cosmetic outcomes.ResultsThe median follow-up time was 36 months. The 3-year OS, LRC, and DMFS rates were 100%, 99.6%, and 99.2%, respectively. Five patients (1.8%) experienced local recurrence or distant metastasis, and one patient succumbed to distant metastasis. The most common acute toxicity was grade 1–2 skin reactions (91.6%). The most common late toxicity was grade 0–1 skin and subcutaneous tissue reactions (96.7%). Five patients (1.8%) developed grade 1–2 upper limb lymphedema, and three patients (1.1%) had grade 1 radiation pneumonitis. Among the 262 patients evaluated for cosmetic outcomes at least 2 years post-radiotherapy, 96.9% achieved excellent or good results, while 3.1% had fair or poor outcomes.ConclusionsSIB-IMRT after breast-conserving surgery in breast cancer patients demonstrated excellent clinical efficacy, mild acute and late toxicities, and satisfactory cosmetic outcomes in our study. SIB-IMRT appears to be a feasible and effective option for breast cancer patients suitable for breast-conserving surgery.

Abstract PO5-02-13: Distinct differences in the prognostic implication of tumor size for invasive lobular carcinoma of breast when compared to invasive ductal carcinoma

Abstract Purpose Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is the second common types of breast cancer and its clinicopathological feature and outcomes differ from invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). However, in terms of survival outcomes, there are conflicting data on the prognostic implication of the ILC when compared to that of IDC. This study aims to evaluate the survival outcomes of patients diagnosed with ILC at single center and compared them with those of IDC. Methods We reviewed the data of the 13,034 IDC patients and 935 ILC patients who were treated between January 2005 and December 2022 at Seoul National University Hospital. We investigated the overall treatment outcomes of two histologic types with a special focus on the tumor size and lymph nodes. Result ILC exhibited distinct characteristics compared to IDC, including a larger tumor size (2.6 ± 1.8 vs. 1.9 ± 1.1 cm, p &amp;lt; 0.001) and a higher hormone receptor positivity (97.4% vs. 79.3%, p &amp;lt; 0.001). Additionally, the presence of lymphovascular emboli was lower in ILC (8.0% vs. 24.6%, p &amp;lt; 0.001). While IDC patients showed slightly better overall survival (OS) than ILC (10-year OS, ILC 89.9% vs. IDC 91.1%, the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.85). However, distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) was significantly higher in ILC (10-year DMFS, ILC 93.2% vs. IDC 89.9%, p = 0.001). Age at diagnosis, tumor size, presence of lymphovascular emboli, high expression of Ki-67, and higher pathologic N stage were poor prognostic markers for ILC. Multivariate analysis for DMFS showed that age, high expression of Ki-67 and higher pathologic N stage were poor prognostic markers for ILC. Tumor size was not an independent prognostic factor for DMFS (HR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.72-1.17, p = 0.491) and for OS (HR: 1.18, 95% CI: 0.99-1.41, p = 0.060) in ILC. Conclusion Our data suggest that the tumor size, which is a well-known prognostic factor in IDC, carries distinctly different prognostic implication in ILC. These observation indicate that adjuvant treatment decisions based on tumor size can be tailored to different histologic subtypes of breast cancer. Citation Format: Ik Beom Shin, Eunhye Kang, Ji-Jung Jung, Hawjeong Lee, Jin Young Byeon, Yunhee Choi, Changjin Lim, Jong-Ho Cheun, Hong-Kyu Kim, Han-Byoel Lee, Wonshik Han, Hyeong-Gon Moon. Distinct differences in the prognostic implication of tumor size for invasive lobular carcinoma of breast when compared to invasive ductal carcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO5-02-13.

Significance of Pre-Treatment CALLY Score Combined with EBV-DNA Levels for Prognostication in Non-Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Cancer Patients: A Clinical Perspective.

The C-reactive protein-albumin-lymphocyte (CALLY) score is a novel indicator associated with inflammation, immunity, and nutrition, utilized for cancer prognostic stratification. This study aimed to evaluate the integrated prognostic significance of the pre-treatment CALLY score and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA levels in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients and to develop prognostic models. A total of 1707 NPC patients from September 2015 to December 2017 were retrospectively enrolled. The cut-off point for the CALLY score, determined by maximum selected rank statistics, integrates with the published cut-off point for pre-EBV DNA to develop a comprehensive index. Subsequently, patients were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio into training and validation cohorts. Survival analysis was conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method with Log rank tests, and the Cox proportional hazards model was applied to identify independent prognostic factors for constructing predictive nomograms. The predictive ability of the nomograms were assessed through the concordance index (C-index), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis. By integrating CALLY scores and EBV-DNA levels, patients were categorized into three risk clusters. Kaplan-Meier curves reveal significant differences in overall survival (OS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and locoregional relapse-free survival (LRRFS) outcomes among different risk groups (all P values < 0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that CALLY-EBV DNA index serves as an independent prognostic factor for the OS, DMFS, and LRRFS. The prognostic nomograms based on the CALLY-EBV DNA index provided accurate predictions for 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year OS, DMFS, and LRRFS. Additionally, compared to the traditional TNM staging system, the nomograms exhibited enhanced discriminatory power, calibration capability, and clinical applicability. All results were in agreement with the validation cohort. The CALLY-EBV DNA index is an independent prognostic biomarker. The nomogram prediction models, constructed based on the CALLY-EBV DNA index, demonstrates superior predictive performance compared to the traditional TNM staging.

Combined pretreatment neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-lymphocyte ratio predicts survival and prognosis in patients with non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a retrospective study

The clinical significance of the combination of neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) is unclear. This study investigated the predictive value of pretreatment NLR (pre-NLR) combined with pretreatment PLR (pre-PLR) for the survival and prognosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). A total of 765 patients with non-metastatic NPC from two hospitals were retrospectively analyzed. The pre-NLR-PLR groups were as follows: HRG, high pre-NLR and high pre-PLR. MRG, high pre-NLR and low pre-PLR or low pre-NLR and high pre-PLR. LRG, neither high pre-NLR nor high pre-PLR. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to identify the cutoff-value and discriminant performance of the model. We compared survival rates and factors affecting the prognosis among different groups. The 5-year overall survival (OS), local regional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) of NPC patients in HRG were significantly poorer than those in MRG and LRG. The pre-NLR-PLR score was positively correlated with T stage, clinical stage, ECOG, and pathological classification. Multivariate cox regression analysis showed that pre-NLR-PLR scoring system, ECOG, pre-ALB, pre-CRP and pre-LMR were independent risk factors affecting 5-year OS, LRRFS and DMFS. The ROC curve showed that area under the curve (AUC) values of pre-NLR-PLR of 5-year OS, LRRFS and DMFS were higher than those of pre-NLR and pre-PLR. pre-NLR-PLR is an independent risk factor for the prognosis of NPC. The pre-NLR-PLR scoring system can be used as an individualized clinical assessment tool to predict the prognosis of patients with non-metastatic NPC more accurately and easily.

Is postmastectomy radiotherapy necessary for breast cancer patients with clinically node-positive downstaging to ypN0 after neoadjuvant chemotherapy?

The significance of postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) in breast cancer patients who initially have clinically node-positive (cN +) status but achieve downstaging to ypN0 following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) remains uncertain. This study aims to assess the impact of PMRT in this patient subset. Patients were enrolled from West China Hospital, Sichuan University from 2008 to 2019. Overall survival (OS), Locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and assessed with the log-rank test. The impact of PMRT was further analyzed by the Cox proportional hazards model. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to reduce the selection bias. Of the 333 eligible patients, 189 (56.8%) received PMRT, and 144 (43.2%) did not. At a median follow-up period of 71months, the five-year LRFS, DMFS, BCSS, and OS rates were 99.1%, 93.4%, 96.4%, and 94.3% for the entire cohort, respectively. Additionally, the 5-year LRFS, DMFS, BCSS, and OS rates were 98.9%, 93.8%, 96.7%, and 94.5% with PMRT and 99.2%, 91.3%, 94.9%, and 92.0% without PMRT, respectively (all p-values not statistically significant). After multivariate analysis, PMRT was not a significant risk factor for any of the endpoints. When further stratified by stage, PMRT did not show any survival benefit for patients with stage II-III diseases. In the context of comprehensive treatments, PMRT might be exempted in ypN0 breast cancer patients. Further large-scale, randomized controlled studies are required to investigate the significance of PMRT in this patient subset.

The influence of Gleason score ≤ 6 histology on the outcome of high-risk localized prostate cancer after modern radiotherapy

We aimed to retrospectively review outcomes in patients with high-risk prostate cancer and a Gleason score ≤ 6 following modern radiotherapy. We analyzed the outcomes of 1374 patients who had undergone modern radiotherapy, comprising a high-risk low grade [HRLG] group (Gleason score ≤ 6; n = 94) and a high-risk high grade [HRHG] group (Gleason score ≥ 7, n = 1125). We included 955 patients who received brachytherapy with or without external beam radio-therapy (EBRT) and 264 who received modern EBRT (intensity-modulated radiotherapy [IMRT] or stereotactic body radiotherapy [SBRT]). At a median follow-up of 60 (2–177) months, actuarial 5-year biochemical failure-free survival rates were 97.8 and 91.8% (p = 0.017), respectively. The frequency of clinical failure in the HRLG group was less than that in the HRHG group (0% vs 5.4%, p = 0.012). The HRLG group had a better 5-year distant metastasis-free survival than the HRHG group (100% vs 96.0%, p = 0.035). As the HRLG group exhibited no clinical failure and better outcomes than the HRHG group, the HRLG group might potentially be classified as a lower-risk group.

Patterns of failure in patients with nasopharyngeal cancer of Northeastern region of India: a retrospective observational study.

We aimed to analyzepatterns of failure and disease volume-treatment outcomes in patients with Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treated with definitive radiation with or without concurrent chemotherapy at a tertiary cancer centre in northeast India. From February 2018 to February 2022, 99 histopathologically proved non-metastatic NPC patients treated with curative-intent RT with or without chemotherapy were retrospectively analyzed. Locally advanced patients received neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to investigate the impact of various prognostic factors on locoregional free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis free survival (DMFS), progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The log-rank test and Kaplan-Meir curves compared outcome variables based on ROC analysis-classified tumor volume. During a median follow up of 25.4months (17.3-39.2), 35(35.4%) patients developed recurrence. Twenty-three patients developed locoregional failures, of which 11 were in-field; 12 patient showed an out-field failure. The 3-year LRFS, DMFS, PFS and OS was 71.10%, 70.90%, 64.10% and 74.10% respectively. There was statistically significant difference in LRFS according to T staging (p < 0.0001). Gross tumor volume (GTVp) and gross nodal volume (GTVn) were an independent prognostic factor for OS, PFS, LRFS and DMFS. The cut-off volumes for GTVp and GTVn for distant metastases and locoregional failure, respectively, were found to be 13 and 22.7mL and 3.7 and 39.2mL, respectively, by ROC curve analysis. Based on this, 99 patients were divided into three subgroups. OS demonstrated significant differences among patients in different volume subgroups for GTVp (p = 0.03) and GTVn (p = 0.00024). For NPC patients who undergo curative IMRT, primary tumour and nodal volumes are independent prognostic indicators. GTVp and GTVn are highly predictive of local control, distant metastases, disease-free survival, and overall survival. This justifies their use as quantitative prognostic indicator for NPC.

Long-term survival, toxicities, and the role of chrono-chemotherapy with different infusion rates in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy: a retrospective study with a 5-year follow-up.

This study aimed to evaluate 5-year outcomes and the late toxicity profile of chrono-chemotherapy with different infusion rates in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Our retrospective analysis included 70 patients with locally advanced NPC stages III and IVB (according to the 2010 American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system). Patients were treated with two cycles of induction chemotherapy (IC) before concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) at Guizhou Cancer Hospital. The IC with docetaxel, cisplatin (DDP) and fluorouracil regimen. Patients were divided into two groups during CCRT. Using a "MELODIE" multi-channel programmed pump, DDP (100 mg/m2) was administered for 12 hours from 10:00 am to 10:00 pm and repeated every 3 weeks for 2-3 cycles. DDP was administered at the peak period of 4:00 pm in the sinusoidal chrono-modulated infusion group (Arm A, n=35). The patients in Arm B received a constant rate of infusion. Both arms received radiotherapy through the same technique and dose fraction. The long-term survival and disease progression were observed. After a median follow-up of 82.8 months, the 5-year progression-free survival rate was 81.3% in Arm A and 79.6% in Arm B (P = 0.85). The 5-year overall survival rate was not significantly different between Arm A and Arm B (79.6% vs 85.3%, P = 0.79). The 5-year distant metastasis-free survival rate was 83.6% in Arm A and 84.6% in Arm B (P = 0.75). The 5-year local recurrence-free survival rate was 88.2% in Arm A and 85.3% in Arm B (P = 0.16). There were no late toxicities of grade 3-4 in either group. Both groups had grade 1-2 late toxicities. Dry mouth was the most common late toxic side effect, followed by hearing loss and difficulty in swallowing. There was no statistically significant difference between Arm A and Arm B in terms of side effects. Long-term analysis confirmed that in CCRT, cisplatin administration with sinusoidal chrono-modulated infusion was not superior to the constant infusion rate in terms of long-term toxicity and prognosis.

Addition of nimotuzumab to concurrent chemoradiotherapy after induction chemotherapy improves outcomes of patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

To investigate the survival outcomes and toxicities associated with the addition of nimotuzumab to concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC) patients who received induction chemotherapy (IC). Patients with stage III-IVA nasopharyngeal carcinoma who received IC and CCRT between January 2017 and October 2021 were retrospectively included. We aimed to compare the locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) between patients treated with CCRT+nimotuzumab and CCRT alone. We included 411 patients in the analysis. Of these patients, 267 (65.0%) and 144 (35.0%) had CCRT+nimotuzumab and CCRT alone, respectively. Similar LRFS was found between those with and without nimotuzumab (92.9% vs. 92.6%, p = 0.855). The 3-year DMFS was 88.2% and 76.2% in those with and without nimotuzumab (p = 0.002). The 3-year DFS was 83.4% and 70.6% in those with and without nimotuzumab treatment (p = 0.003). The 3-year OS was 92.1% and 81.1% in those with and without nimotuzumab (p = 0.003). The multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that the addition of nimotuzumab was independently associated with better DMFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.606, p = 0.049), DFS (HR 0.613, p = 0.028), and OS (HR 0.497, p = 0.019). No significant differences in major toxicities were found between the two treatment arms, including hematologic toxicities, hepatoxicity, nephrotoxicity, gastrointestinal reactions, and mucositis (all p > 0.05). The addition of nimotuzumab to CCRT after IC in LANPC has shown promising results in improving treatment outcomes and acceptable toxicities.

Initial local resection versus early referral for spermatic cord sarcoma: Any impact on treatment timelines and oncological outcomes?

ObjectivesSpermatic cord sarcomas are exceedingly rare, often misdiagnosed and subsequently improperly treated at local hospitals. This retrospective study looked at the oncological outcomes of spermatic cord sarcoma cases managed with curative intent resection at a tertiary referral sarcoma centre. We specifically studied how initial inadequate resections impact the oncologic outcomes compared to primary tumour resections at the reference centre. MethodsOne hundred eighteen consecutive patients affected by primary, localized spermatic cord sarcoma surgically managed at our reference centre from January 2001 through January 2021 were included. Primary endpoints were local relapse free (LRFS), distant metastasis free (DMFS) and overall survival (OS). These outcomes were evaluated with multi-nomial logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards regression models for a co-relation to known patient, tumour and treatment-related prognostic factors, including a prior inadequate resection and time from diagnosis to a complete oncologic resection as independent variables. Secondarily, we compared the above variables and treatment intervals among the subgroups of primary versus re-resection surgery. ResultsOver a median follow-up of 54 months (IQR 25–105), 12 patients (10.2%) developed local recurrence (LR) and 14 (11.6%) had distant metastasis (DM). 5-year local relapse (LRFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were 89.3% and 86.5%, respectively. Higher tumour grade and size were associated with a worse DMFS (p=<0.05). Likewise, marginal (R1) resection correlated with an inferior LRFS (p=< 0.05).Eighty-four patients (71.2%) had their initial diagnosis established on an inadequate surgical excision performed in a local hospital, followed by a re-excision at our centre (Re-resection group). During the same period, 34 (28.8%) were managed primarily with biopsy and treatment at our reference centre (Primary-resection group). The two groups had statistically significant differences in tumour size, histopathology, surgery duration, rate of postoperative complication and R0 resection (p < 0.005). Additionally, the difference in time intervals to achieve the treatment targets was statistically insignificant and did not correlate to the risk of recurrence as an independent variable. Residual disease was present in 51.2 % (n = 43) of the re-excision specimens. However, following a complete R0 resection, this did not correlate with a higher risk of recurrence (p = 0.481). ConclusionPrompt referral to a tertiary centre, where multidisciplinary evaluation and sound oncologic resections are the standard of treatment, can align the OS and DFS of patients receiving incomplete surgery elsewhere to those treated primarily in referral centres. The primary determinant of prognosis remains surgical margin, tumour size and grade.

Treatment Outcomes of Patients with Ependymoma Receiving Radiotherapy: A Single Institution Experience

Introduction: This study explored the failure pattern and clinical outcomes in patients with ependymoma undergoing radiotherapy. Methods: Between January 2004 and June 2022, we included 32 patients with ependymoma who underwent radiotherapy as part of the multimodality treatment at our institution. Of these, 27 (84.4%) underwent adjuvant radiotherapy, four received radiotherapy after local recurrence, and one received definitive CyberKnife radiotherapy (21 Gy in three fractions). The median prescribed dose was 54 Gy in patients who received conventional radiotherapy. We analyzed the local progression-free survival (LPFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and potential prognostic factors. Results: The median age was 29.8 years. Approximately 28.1% were pediatric patients. Fifteen tumors (46.9%) were World Health Organization (WHO) grade II, 10 (31.3%) were WHO grade III, and seven (22.8%) were WHO grade I. Among them, 15 patients (46.9%) had posterior fossa tumors, 10 (31.3%) had supratentorial tumors, and seven (22.8%) had spinal tumors. Of the 31 patients who underwent upfront surgical resection, 19 (61.3%) underwent gross total resection or near-total resection. Seventeen of 19 patients with first failures (89.5%) had isolated local recurrences. Of the 19 patients with disease progression, 11 (57.9%) were disease free or had stable disease after salvage therapy, and five (26.3%) had disease-related mortality. Most of the first local recurrences after radiotherapy occurred infield (13 of 16, 81.3%). The 5-year LPFS, DMFS, PFS, and OS rates were 48.5%, 89.6%, 45.1%, and 88.4%, respectively, at a median follow-up of 6.25 years. Subtotal resection was associated with poorer LPFS and PFS in patients with intracranial ependymoma (hazard ratio = 3.69, p = 0.018, for LPFS; hazard ratio = 3.20, p = 0.029, for PFS). Conclusion: Incorporating radiotherapy into multimodal treatment has led to favorable outcomes in patients with ependymoma, and the extent of resection is a prognostic factor for the local control of intracranial ependymoma.

Radiotherapy alone versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with stage II and T3N0 nasopharyngeal carcinoma with adverse features: A propensity score-matched cohort study

Background and purposeWhether concurrent chemoradiotherapy would provide survival benefits in patients with stage II and T3N0 NPC with adverse factors remains unclear in IMRT era. We aimed to assess the value of concurrent chemotherapy compared to IMRT alone in stage II and T3N0 NPC with adverse features. Materials and methods287 patients with stage II and T3N0 NPC with adverse factors were retrospectively analyzed, including 98 patients who received IMRT alone (IMRT alone group) and 189 patients who received cisplatin-based concurrent chemotherapy (CCRT group). The possible prognostic factors were balanced using propensity score matching (PSM). Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to evaluate the survival rates, and log-rank tests were employed to compare differences between groups. ResultsThe median follow-up duration was 90.8 months (interquartile range = 75.6–114.7 months). The IMRT alone and the CCRT group were well matched; however, for all survival-related endpoints, there were no significant differences between them (5-year failure-free survival: 84.3% vs. 82.7%, P value = 0.68; 5-year overall survival: 87.3% vs. 90.6%, P value = 0.11; 5-year distant metastasis-free survival: 92.8% vs. 92.5%, P value = 0.97; 5-year locoregional relapse-free survival: 93.4% vs. 89.9%, P value = 0.30). The incidence of acute toxicities in the IMRT alone group was significantly lower than that in the CCRT group. ConclusionFor patients with stage II and T3N0 NPC with adverse features treated using IMRT, no improvement in survival was gained by adding concurrent chemotherapy; however, the occurrence of acute toxicities increased significantly. For those combined with non-single adverse factors, the comprehensive treatment strategy needs further exploration.

Clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of breast cancer patients with tumor deposits in the ipsilateral axillary region

Objective: To investigate the clinicopathologic features and prognostic factors of breast cancer patients with tumor deposits in the ipsilateral axillary region. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathologic data and follow-up results of 155 patients with breast cancer diagnosed for the first time and complicated with tumor deposits in the ipsilateral axillary region in the Department of Thyroid-Breast-Vascular Surgery of Xijing Hospital from January 2008 to September 2018. Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis. Log rank test was used for the univariate analysis of prognostic factors, and Cox regression was used for multivariate analysis. Results: The median disease free survival (DFS), median distant metastasis free survival (DMFS), and median overall survival (OS) of the 155 patients were 52.0 months, 66.6 months, and 102.2 months, respectively. The 5-year and 10-year DFS rates were 45.7% and 23.1%, the 5-year and 10-year DMFS rates were 56.9% and 28.9%, and the 5-year and 10-year OS rates were 79.3% and 46.0%, respectively. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that family tumor history (HR=0.362, 95% CI: 0.140-0.937), clinical T stage (T3: HR=3.508, 95% CI: 1.380-8.918; T4: HR=2.220, 95% CI: 1.076-4.580), estrogen/progesterone receptor status (HR=0.476, 95% CI: 0.261-0.866), number of tumor deposits (HR=1.965, 95% CI:1.104-3.500) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (HR=1.961, 95% CI: 1.032-3.725) were independent influencing factors for DFS. Molecular subtype [human epidermal growth factor receptor-2(HER-2) positive and hormone receptor negative: HR=7.862, 95% CI: 3.189-19.379], number of tumor deposits (HR=2.155, 95% CI: 1.103-4.212), neoadjuvant chemotherapy (HR=5.002, 95% CI: 2.300-10.880) and radiotherapy (HR=2.316, 95% CI: 1.005-5.341) were independent influencing factors of DMFS. Histological grade (HR=4.362, 95% CI: 1.932-9.849), estrogen/progesterone receptor expression (HR=0.399, 95% CI: 0.168-0.945), HER-2 expression (HR=2.535, 95% CI: 1.114-5.768) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (HR=4.080, 95% CI: 1.679-9.913) were independent influencing factors of OS. Conclusions: The presence of tumor deposits weakens the influence of axillary lymph node status and distant metastases on the prognosis of breast cancer patients. Therefore, a clinicopathological staging system taking into account tumor deposits should be developed. Since the number of tumor deposits affects the risk of recurrence and metastasis of breast cancer patients, we recommend that the number of tumor deposits should be reported in detail in the pathological report after breast cancer surgery.

Omission of radiotherapy to lymph node level III in patients with cN0 adenoid cystic carcinoma of the major salivary gland: a single center experience.

Due to the rarity of adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) of the major salivary gland, there is no consensus on the extent of prophylactic neck irradiation (PNI) for patients with clinically negative lymph nodes (cN0) disease. We conducted a retrospective analysis of all patients with ACC of the major salivary gland who received treatment at our center between January 2010 and April 2020. The primary endpoint was regional failure-free survival(RRFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), and acute toxicity. A total of 139 patients were included in the analysis. For cN0 patients, the 5-year RRFS, OS, DMFS, and LRFS were 93.2%, 90.2%, 75.7%, and 91.4%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that PORT was an independent prognostic factor for RRFS and LRFS. No statistically significant differences were observed between the Level III sparing PNI group and the Standard PNI group in terms of RRFS, OS, DMFS, and LRFS. The doses delivered to the larynx and thyroid in the Level III sparing PNI group were significantly lower than those in the Standard PNI group. In patients with cN0 ACC of the major salivary gland, PNI improves regional control, and the level III nodal region sparing radiotherapy does not increase the risk of level III recurrence, while potentially reducing toxicity.

Is radiotherapy necessary for upper rectal cancer underwent curative resection? A retrospective study of 363 patients

BackgroundTo investigate the impact of radiotherapy (RT) on recurrence and survival in patients with locally advanced upper rectal cancer underwent curative resection.Methods363 locally advanced upper rectal cancer cases were identified from the database of our hospital from 2010 to 2018. All patients underwent curative resection and had the lower margin of the tumor located 10–15 cm from the anal verge, among them, 69 patients received pre- or post-operative radiotherapy and 294 patients without. Local control and survivals were compared, and stratification grouping based on European Society for Medical Oncology risk factors were further compared. 1:2 propensity score matching analysis was used to reduce the impact of confounding factors.ResultsThere were 207 patients after 1:2 matching (RT group:non-RT group = 69:138). The 5-year overall survival (OS) of the RT group and non-RT group after matching was 84.1% and 80.9%, respectively(P = 0.440); the 5-year local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) was 96.5% and 94.7%, respectively(P = 0.364); the 5-year distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) was 76.8% and 76.9%, respectively(P = 0.531). Subgroup analysis showed that radiotherapy could not significantly improve the overall survival, local recurrence, and distant metastasis with or without poor prognostic features. In the high-risk subgroup, the 5-year OS was 76.9% and 79.6% for patients treated with radiotherapy and without (P = 0.798), LRFS was 94.8% and 94.2%, respectively (P = 0.605), DMFS 68.7% and 74.7%, respectively (P = 0.233).ConclusionsOur results suggest that radiotherapy could not improve local control and survival for locally advanced upper rectal cancer patients underwent curative resection, even in the cases with poor prognostic features.

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in older patients with stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma after intensity-modulated radiotherapy: A propensity score-matched cohort study

Background and purposeWhether concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) benefits the older (age ≥ 60 years) patients with stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) has not been determined. This study aimed to compare the outcomes and toxicities of CCRT with Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) alone in older patients with stage II NPC. Materials and methodsBetween January 2010 and December 2017, 220 older (age ≥ 60 years) patients with stage II NPC were analyzed. A pair of 53 patients were matched between the CCRT group and RT group by using propensity score matching (PSM) in terms of age, sex, pathological type, T and N stage, ACE-27 scores, CRP, LDH and Hb. Cancer-specific survival (CSS), progression-free survival (PFS), locoregional relapse-free survival (LRRFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were analysed by the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Multivariate analysis was performed to assess the prognostic risk factors by using a Cox’s proportional hazards regression model. Treatment toxicities were clarified and compared between the two groups by using the χ2 test. ResultsThe median follow-up time of the whole cohort was 82.0 months (range, 11–151 months). PSM analysis indicated that compared with the RT group, significantly higher 5-year CSS (98.1 % vs. 83.0 %, P = 0.02), PFS (98.1 % vs. 79.2 %, P = 0.01) and DMFS (100.0 % vs. 92.4 %, P = 0.04) were observed in the CCRT group. Multivariate analysis showed that CCRT was an independent prognostic factor predicting CSS (HR, 0.34; 95 % CI, 0.15–0.79; P = 0.01), PFS (HR, 0.48; 95 % CI, 0.25–0.93; P = 0.03), and LRRFS (HR, 0.36; 95 % CI, 0.14–0.90; P = 0.03), and a higher ACE-27 score predicted a worse CSS. Patients in the CCRT group experienced higher frequencies of the acute toxicities than patients in the RT group. Late complications were comparable between the two groups. ConclusionCCRT significantly improved the survival benefits for the older patients with stage II NPC compared with IMRT alone without adding late complications, whereas increased some of the treatment-associated acute toxicities.

Selective Avoidance of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Human Epidermal Growth Factor 2-Positive/Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients With Excellent Response.

The Avoid Axillary Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (ASLAN) trial aims to demonstrate the oncologic safety of omitting axillary surgery in patients with excellent response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for early human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)-positive (+)/triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) who have undergone breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and adjuvant radiotherapy. The ASLAN trial will provide crucial information that could change the procedure in highly selected patients undergoing axillary surgery after NACT. ASLAN is a prospective, multicenter, and single-arm surgical trial. The recruitment will be conducted among five tertiary care hospitals in the Republic of Korea. The total number of patients to be recruited will be 178, and we plan to complete patient enrollment by December 2023. The enrollment is considered among patients with HER2+ breast cancer (BC) or TNBC at clinical stage T1-3N0-1M0 who are expected to achieve breast pathological complete response (BpCR) based on a combination of radiologic imaging and physical examination after NACT. BCS was performed on eligible patients. After BCS, patients who showed BpCR were enrolled with the omission of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). The primary study endpoint upon completion of this trial is 5-year recurrence-free survival, and the secondary endpoints include the 5-year ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence interval, 5-year ipsilateral axillary recurrence interval, 5-year distant metastasis-free survival, 5-year BC-specific survival, 5-year overall survival, 5-year contralateral BC-free survival, re-operation rate according to breast biopsy after NACT, adverse events within 5 years, and quality of life. Several clinical trials are currently underway to determine whether SLNB can be omitted after NACT in patients with HER2+ BC or TNBC that are expected to achieve pathologic complete response. The ASLAN trial is expected to provide valuable clues regarding the feasibility of omitting axillary surgery in highly selected patients. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04993625. Registered on August 6, 2021. Clinical Research Information Service Identifier: KCT0006371. Registered on July 22, 2021.