5-year DFS Research Articles

Real-World Outcomes for Localised Gastro-Oesophageal Adenocarcinoma Cancer Treated with Perioperative FLOT and Prophylactic GCSF Support in a Single Asian Centre.

Perioperative FLOT (5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin and docetaxel) is a standard of care for patients with locally advanced gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA) in Western guidelines, but its use is limited in Asian patients. We report outcomes from a single Asian centre of perioperative FLOT with concomitant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF) prophylaxis. A retrospective analysis of all 56 stage II to III GEA patients treated with perioperative FLOT at the National Cancer Centre Singapore between June 2017 and February 2024 was performed. All patients were discussed at a multidisciplinary tumour board, underwent preoperative laparoscopic staging, and received prophylactic GCSF with perioperative FLOT. Surgery was performed across four partner institutions. The primary endpoints were the tolerability of FLOT and pathological complete response (pCR). A univariate analysis of factors associated with survival and adverse events was also performed. Overall, 33 patients (58.9%) completed eight cycles of pre- and postoperative FLOT, and 92.9% underwent resection. The commonest grade 3 to 4 adverse events (AEs) were diarrhoea (10.7%) and neutropenia (5.6%). The 30- and 90-day postoperative mortality rates were 0% and 1.9%, respectively. In resected tumours, the pCR was 15.4%. The median DFS was 27.5 months, but the median OS was not reached. The values for 1-, 2-, and 3-year DFS were 74.6%, 61.0%, and 46.5%, respectively. The values for 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS were 85.0%, 67.4%, and 61.0%, respectively. In the univariate analysis of patients who underwent resection, an ECOG status of 0 was associated with better DFS, while ypN0, R0 resection, and pathological stages 0-II were associated with better DFS and OS. Patients ≥ 65 years benefited from FLOT similarly to those <65 years in terms of DFS (HR 1.03; p = 0.940) and OS (HR 1.08; p = 0.869), with similar rates of grade 3 to 4 AEs. Patients with a higher housing index (HI) were less likely to experience ≥grade 3 AEs compared to those with a lower HI (OR 0.16, p = 0.029). This study presents a unique real-world Asian experience of perioperative FLOT with prophylactic GCSF use, with low rates of G3 to 4 neutropenia. The tolerability of FLOT was similar to that reported in Western populations. Furthermore, similar survival and rates of grade 3 to 4 AEs were observed in elderly patients. Patients of lower socioeconomic status were more likely to experience severe AEs, highlighting the need to proactively support vulnerable groups during treatment.

Outcomes of children and young adults with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia given blinatumomab as last consolidation treatment before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Blinatumomab has remarkable efficacy in patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) or measurable residual disease (MRD)-positive B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). In many patients, blinatumomab treatment is followed by allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). However, the influence of blinatumomab on HSCT outcomes in children and young adults (YA) remains to be fully elucidated. We conducted a single-center, retrospective analysis on patients given blinatumomab as last treatment before HSCT. Seventy-eight pediatric and YA patients were evaluated. With a median follow-up of 23.23 months, the 2-year disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) probability were 72.2% and 89.2%, respectively, with a 2-year cumulative incidence (CI) of non-relapse mortality (NRM) of 2.6%. A trend toward improved 2-year DFS, but not OS, was noted in patients transplanted in first complete remission (CR1) (92.9%) compared to those in second or greater remission (CR2/3) (68.5%, p=0.18) due to a lower CI of relapse (0% vs. 29.9%, p=0.05). Among CR2/3 patients, those receiving the sequential combination of inotuzumab and blinatumomab had a significantly lower CI of relapse as compared to those who did not receive inotuzumab (9.5% vs. 40.4%, p=0.023). Relapse after HSCT occurred in 16 patients, all exhibiting CD19-positive blasts; 10 of them received anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy and 2 inotuzumab as salvage therapy, leading to a 2-year post-relapse OS of 52.7%. Our results indicate that HSCT following blinatumomab in children and YA with B-ALL is highly effective, being associated with low NRM and not affecting the efficacy of subsequent salvage immunotherapies, including CAR-T cells.

Impact of the CPS-EG score as a new prognostic biomarker in triple-negative breast cancer patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy

BackgroundThis study aimed to establish risk groups on the basis of CPS-EG scores, independent of pCR status, in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) to identify the prognostic impact of the CPS-EG score.MethodsPatient characteristics included age, menopausal status, clinical stage, pathological stage, estrogen receptor (ER) expression, nuclear grade, Ki-67 proliferation index, residual cancer burden (RCB) score, HER2 status, and other tumor characteristics. The CPS-EG scoring system included clinical stage, pathological stage, ER status, and grade. Patients were divided into two groups on the basis of their CPS-EG scores ≤ 3 and > 3.ResultsA total of 148 patients who were diagnosed with TNBC and treated with NACT were included in the study. A total of 52.0% of the patients had a CPS-EG score of ≤ 3, whereas 48.0% had a score of > 3. The rate of patients who achieved pCR was 29.7% (n = 44). CPS-EG score (HR: 2.331; 95%CI; 1.179–4.608; p = 0.015), pCR (HR: 0.348; 95%CI; 0.144–0.844; p = 0.019), pre-treatment mKi-67 proliferation index (HR: 0.467; 95%CI; 0.251–0.871; p = 0.017), and RCB score (HR: 0.401; 95%CI; 0.174–0.923; p = 0.032) were identified as significant prognostic factors for 5-year DFS. For 5-year OS, significant prognostic factors were CPS-EG score (HR: 2.30; 95%CI; 1.036–4.799; p = 0.040) and pre-treatment mKi-67 proliferation index (HR: 0.484; 95%CI; 0.246–0.954; p = 0.036).ConclusionsThe CPS-EG score, pre-treatment mKi-67 level, and the pCR and RCB score were practical prognostic markers for long-term survival. Conversely, the prognostic significance of pCR status was diminished, particularly in predicting OS. These findings underscore the importance of not only post-treatment pathological staging but also the initial tumor stage and biological characteristics of the tumor in predicting ultimate survival outcomes following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in TNBC patients.

Survival Outcomes of Neoadjuvant Therapy Followed by Sleeve Lobectomy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

This study was carried out to evaluate the impact of neoadjuvant therapy on long-term survival in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients undergoing sleeve lobectomy. A total of 613 patients were retrospectively analyzed, including 124 who received neoadjuvant therapy. A 1:2 Propensity score matching (PSM) method was adopted to create a balanced cohort including 110 with neoadjuvant therapy and 169 without neoadjuvant therapy. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the Log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards models. Neoadjuvant therapy was associated with improved 3-year DFS (73.6% vs. 54.4%, P<0.001) and OS (80.9% vs. 63.9%, P=0.002) compared to patients without neoadjuvant therapy. Moreover, neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy significantly improved 3-year DFS (85.3% vs. 54.4%, P=0.001) and OS (88.2% vs. 63.9%, P=0.006), whereas chemotherapy alone did not show a significant effect. Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed that neoadjuvant therapy was an independent predictor of improved DFS and OS while pathological N2 stage was independently associated with poorer DFS and OS. Furthermore, subgroup analysis in the neoadjuvant arm revealed that pathological N2 stage was an independent risk factor for DFS (HR, 3.830; 95% CI, 1.687-8.694; P=0.001), and achieving major pathologic response (MPR) was an independent predictor for better OS (HR, 0.120; 95% CI, 0.015-0.933; P=0.043). Neoadjuvant therapy prior to sleeve lobectomy significantly increased DFS and OS in locally advanced NSCLC. Sleeve lobectomy is advisable followed by neoadjuvant therapy, especially with chemoimmunotherapy.

Long-term outcomes of intraoperative chemotherapy with 5-FU for colorectal cancer patients receiving curative resection (IOCCRC): a randomized, multicenter, prospective, phase III trial.

We aimed to compare combined intraoperative chemotherapy and surgical resection with curative surgical resection alone in colorectal cancer patients. We performed a multicenter, open-label, randomized, phase III trial. All eligible patients were randomized and assigned to intraoperative chemotherapy and curative surgical resection or curative surgical resection alone (1:1). Survival actualization after long-term follow-up was performed in patients analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. From January 2011 to January 2016, 696 colorectal cancer patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to intraoperative chemotherapy and radical surgical resection (n=341) or curative surgical resection alone (n=344). Intraoperative chemotherapy with surgical resection showed no significant survival benefit over surgical resection alone in colorectal cancer patients (3-year DFS: 91.1% vs. 90.0%, P=0.328; 3-year OS: 94.4% vs. 95.9%, P=0.756). However, colon cancer patients benefitted from intraoperative chemotherapy, with a relative 4% reduction in liver and peritoneal metastasis (HR=0.336, 95% CI: 0.148-0.759, P=0.015) and a 6.5% improvement in 3-year DFS (HR=0.579, 95% CI: 0.353-0.949, P=0.032). Meanwhile, patients with colon cancer and abnormal pretreatment CEA levels achieved significant survival benefits from intraoperative chemotherapy (DFS: HR=0.464, 95% CI: 0.233-0.921, P=0.029 and OS: (HR=0.476, 95% CI: 0.223-1.017, P=0.049). Intraoperative chemotherapy showed no significant extra prognostic benefit in total colorectal cancer patients who underwent radical surgical resection; however, in colon cancer patients with abnormal pretreatment serum CEA levels (> 5ng/ml), intraoperative chemotherapy could improve long-term survival.

Appendiceal adenocarcinoma-patterns of tumor spread and prognosis

IntroductionAppendiceal adenocarcinoma represents a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge since it is prone to early lymphatic and peritoneal spread. We aimed to analyze the proportion of lymph node metastases in completion right hemicolectomy specimens, risk factors for peritoneal metastases (PM), and prognosis after definitive treatment. MethodsNinety-three patients with appendiceal adenocarcinoma scheduled for cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS + HIPEC) in Uppsala 2004–2020 were identified from a prospectively maintained registry. Risk factors for PM were assessed based on the presence (CT + group, n = 55) or absence (CT – group, n = 37) of visible PM at baseline CT scan. Prognostic factors were analyzed based on the actual presence (PM group, n = 66) or absence (no PM group, n = 27) of PM. ResultsThe median age was 60 (26–78). Forty-eight patients were women. Resection of PM at initial surgery indicated an 80 % risk of finding PM at a follow-up exploration. R1 appendectomy and perforated appendix had a similar risk for PM (24 %,26 %) which increased to 38 % if both were present.Regional lymph node metastases occurred in 31 % in the CT + group vs. 14 % in the CT − group (p = 0.005) and was associated with poor survival HR 5.16 (1.49–17.81).The 5-year OS and DFS rates were 54 % and 29 % in the PM group. ConclusionsPatients with certain risk factors have a high likelihood of PM despite a normal CT scan, which justifies selective exploration at a HIPEC center. Regional lymph node spread supports the current practice of completion right hemicolectomy and is a significant prognostic factor.

Impacts of participation in surgical clinical trial on safety and survival outcomes in patients with right-sided colon cancer

Objective: To explore the impact on safety and prognosis in patients with right-sided colon cancer participating in surgical clinical research. Methods: This retrospective cohort study utilized data from a randomized controlled trial (RELARC study) conducted by the colorectal surgery group at Peking Union Medical College Hospital in which laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision (CME) was compared with D2 radical resection for the management of right-sided colon cancer. The eligibility criteria were age 18-75 years, biopsy-proven colon adenocarcinoma, tumor located between the cecum and right 1/3 of the transverse colon, enhanced chest, abdomen, and pelvic CT scans suggesting tumor stage T2-T4N0M0 or TanyN+ M0, and having undergone radical surgical treatment from January 2016 to December 2019. Exclusion factors included multiple primary colorectal cancers, preoperative stage T1N0 or enlarged central lymph nodes, tumor involving surrounding organs requiring their resection, definite distant metastasis or otherwise unable to undergo R0 resection, history of any other malignant tumors within previous 5 years, intestinal obstruction, perforation, or gastrointestinal bleeding requiring emergency surgery, and assessed as unsuitable for laparoscopic surgery. Patients who had participated in the RELARC study were included in the RELARC group, whereas those who met the inclusion criteria but refused to participate in the RELAEC study were included in the control group. The main indicators studied were the patient's baseline data, surgery and perioperative conditions, pathological characteristics, adjuvant treatment, and postoperative follow-up (including average frequency of follow-up within the first 3 years) and survival (including 3-year disease-free survival rate (DFS) and 3-year overall survival rate (OS). Differences in these indicators between the RELARC and control groups were compared. Results: The study cohort comprised 290 patients, 173 in the RELARC group (RELARC-CME group, 82; RELARC-D2 group, 91) and 117 in the control group (CME control group, 72; D2 control group, 45). There was a significantly higher proportion of overweight patients (BMI ≥24 kg/m2) in the RELARC-CME than in the CME control group (67.1% [55/82] vs. 33.3% [24/72], χ2=17.469, P<0.001). There were no other statistically significant differences in baseline characteristics (all P>0.05). No significant disparities were found between the CME and D2 groups in terms of operation duration, intraoperative blood loss, rate of conversion to open surgery, combined organ resection, intraoperative blood transfusion, or intraoperative complications (all P>0.05). There was a trend toward Clavien-Dindo grade II or higher postoperative complications in the RELARC-CME group (24.4% [20/82]) than in the CME control group (18.1% [13/72]); however, this difference was not statistically significant (χ2=0.914, P=0.339). Similarly, the difference in this rate did not differ significantly between the RELARC-D2 group (25.3% [23/91]) and D2 control group (24.4% [11/45], χ2=0.011, P=0.916). The median duration of postoperative follow-up was significantly shorter in the RELARC groups than in the corresponding control groups. Specifically, the median duration of follow-up was 4.5 (4.5, 4.5) months in the RELARC-CME and 7.2 (6.0, 9.0) months in the CME control group (Z=-10.608, P<0.001). Similarly, the median duration of follow-up was 4.5 (4.5, 4.5) months in the RELARC-D2 group as opposed to 8.3 (6.6, 9.0) months in the D2 control group (Z=-10.595, P<0.001). The 3-year DFS rate (91.5%) and OS rate (96.3%) tended to be higher in the RELARC-CME group than in the CME control group (84.7% and 90.3%, respectively). The 3-year DFS rate (87.9%) and OS rate (96.7%) tended to be higher in the RELARC-D2 group than in the D2 control group (81.8% and 88.6%, respectively); however, these differences were not statistically significant (all P>0.05). Subgroup analysis according to pathological stage revealed that patients in the RELARC-D2 group with pN0 stage achieved a significantly superior 3-year OS rate than did those in the D2 control group (100% vs. 88.9%, P=0.008). We identified no statistically significant differences in survival rates between the remaining subgroups (all P>0.05). Conclusions: A high-quality surgical clinical trial with close follow-up can achieve perioperative safety and a trend toward improved survival outcomes.

Outcomes following extended resection of radiation-induced angiosarcoma of the breast: a sarcoma unit experience and systematic review.

Radiation-induced angiosarcoma (RIAS) of the breast is a rare tumour with high rate of local recurrence. The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcome of radical resections. A retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent extended surgical resection for RIAS of the breast between 2013 and 2022. Included were patients who underwent radical resection, including complete resection of previously irradiated skin and underlying fascia of pectoralis major. Post-operative and long-term oncological outcomes were than analysed. A systematic review was performed using the MEDLINE database in the last 20 years. Twenty-two (n = 22) patients met the inclusion criteria. The median length of the specimen was 220 mm (range, 120-377 mm). At a median follow-up of 33.5 months (range, 7.9-102.4), 3 (13.6%) patients had both local and metastatic lung disease and 1 (4%) patient with only lung metastasis. The estimated 3- and 5-year OS was 81.1% and 57.9%, respectively. The estimated 3- and 5-year DSS was 91.7% and 65.5%, respectively. The estimated 3- and 5-year DFS rate were both 75.2%. The systematic review identified 17 studies with a recurrence rate ranging from 33% to 100%. Treatment of RIAS of the breast with an up-front locally extended approach is associated with a low rate of local recurrence compared with the reported literature.

SP3.3 - Real World Experience of 600+ Minimally Invasive Abdominoperineal Resections (APR) Done for Low Rectal Cancers in Tertiary Cancer Care Center

Abstract Introduction APR is standard of care surgery for low rectal cancers involving sphincter. Surgery is commonly done in minimally invasive way. Robotic surgery has recently gained popularity due to ease of procedure. Margin positivity and local recurrence still remain a challenge. Methods It is a retrospective study from prospectively maintained database from Aug 2013 to Aug 2023. Surgical and oncological outcome were analyzed using SPSS version 25 software. Results Total 657 minimally invasive APRs were done. All were done in supine lithotomy position. 570 were laparoscopic and 87 robotic. Mean age was 48.4 years. 6 cases were converted to open (5 lap and 1 robotic). Mean BMI was 22.3. Mean distance from anal verge was 3 cm. Majority patients were cT3 (74%). Median blood loss was 150 ml. Clavien Dindo grade III and beyond complications were seen in 11.2%. Mean hospital stay was 7 days. Mean nodes harvested were 13. Mean no of positive nodes were 1.22. Extended resections (extended TME) were 25% in lap and 42% in robotic. Poorly differentiated and signet histology was seen in 27%. CRM positivity was 6.9%. It increases to 15.5% in signet ring histology. Median follow up achieved was 46 months. Local recurrence was 5.5%. Distant recurrence was 20%. 3-year OS and DFS were 73% and 63% respectively. Conclusion In high volume minimally invasive surgery centre, MIS abdominoperineal resection - both laparoscopic and robotic has acceptable surgical and oncological outcomes.

Prognosis of pediatric BCP-ALL with IKZF1 deletions and impact of intensive chemotherapy: Results of SCCLG-2016 study.

IKZF1 deletion (IKZF1del) is associated with poor prognosis in B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL). But the prognosis of IKZF1del combined with other prognostic stratification factors remains unclear. Whether intensified treatment improves BCP-ALL prognosis has not been determined. A retrospective analysis was performed on 1291 pediatric patients diagnosed with BCP-ALL and treated with the South China Children's Leukemia 2016 protocol. Patients were stratified based on IKZF1 status for comparison of characteristics and outcome. Additionally, IKZF1del patients were further divided based on chemotherapy intensity for outcome assessments. The BCP-ALL pediatric patients with IKZF1del in south China showed poorer early response. Notably, the DFS and OS for IKZF1del patients were markedly lower than IKZF1wt group (3-year DFS: 88.7% [95% CI: 83.4%-94.0%] vs. 93.5% [95% CI: 92.0%-94.9%], P = .021; 3-year OS: 90.7% [95% CI: 85.8% to 95.6%] vs. 96.1% [95% CI: 95% to 97.2%, P = .003]), with a concurrent increase in 3-year TRM (6.4% [95% CI: 2.3%-10.5%] vs. 2.9% [95% CI: 1.9%-3.8%], P = .025). However, the 3-year CIR was comparable between the two groups (5.7% [95% CI: 1.8%-9.5%] vs. 3.7% [95% CI: 2.6%-4.7%], P = .138). Subgroup analyses reveal no factor significantly influenced the prognosis of the IKZF1del cohort. Noteworthy, intensive chemotherapy improved DFS from 85.7% ± 4.1% to 94.1% ± 0.7% in IKZF1del group (P = .084). Particularly in BCR::ABL positive subgroup, the 3-year DFS was remarkably improved from 53.6% ± 20.1% with non-intensive chemotherapy to 100% with intensive chemotherapy (P = .026). Pediatric BCP-ALL patients with IKZF1del in South China manifest poor outcomes without independent prognostic significance. While no factor substantially alters the prognosis in the IKZF1del group. Intensified chemotherapy may reduce relapse rates and improve DFS in patients with IKZF1del subset, particularly in IKZFdel patients with BCR::ABL positive.

560. ANALYSIS OF CLINICOPATHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND PROGNOSIS OF SYNCHRONOUS MULTIPLE PRIMARY ESOPHAGEAL SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMAS (SMP-ESCC) AFTER RECEIVING NEOADJUVANT THERAPY

Abstract Background SMP-ESCC is a rare subtype of esophageal cancer. Esophagectomy after neoadjuvant therapy became the standard treatment. However, there are still no studies comparing SMP-ESCC and single lesion esophageal squamous cell carcinomas (SL-ESCC) after neoadjuvant therapy. Our study aimed to analyze the differences of clinicopathological features and prognosis between SMP-ESCC and SL-ESCC. Methods All patients who received neoadjuvant therapy (Platinum-based chemotherapy regimen with or without radiotherapy at a total dose of 41.4-50.4 Gy/23-28 times) and plan esophagectomy were consecutively collected from January 2019 to March 2023. SMP-ESCC was defined as multiple lesions in the esophagus found at the time of diagnosis by endoscopy, with lesions more than 1 cm apart by normal mucosa, and diagnosed by pathology as squamous carcinoma or Tis. The cohort was divided into two groups (SMP-ESCC vs. SL-ESCC) with a 1:1 ratio through propensity score matching, and the differences in clinicopathological features and prognosis were compared. Results A total of 926 patients were enrolled, 58 (6.4%) patients had the type of SMP-ESCC. SMP-ESCC had higher pN stages (p&amp;lt;0.001), and a lower rate of pathological complete response (13.8% vs. 29.4%, p=0.016). SMP-ESCC had a poorer OS (49.8% vs. 65.0%, p=0.020) and DFS (21.1% vs. 61.0%, p&amp;lt;0.001) (Figure A-B). After matching, SMP-ESCC had a poorer 3-year DFS (33.5% vs. 60.9%, p=0.020) and a trend of poorer OS (51.0% vs. 71.7%, p=0.086) (Figure 1 C-D). Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that SMP-ESCC was an independent risk factor for OS (HR: 2.258, 95%CI: 1.006-5.068, p=0.048) and DFS (HR: 2.175, 95%CI: 1.157-4.092, p=0.016). Conclusion SMP-ESCC had a poorer response to neoadjuvant therapy compared to patients with SL-ESCC. And SMP-ESCC was an independent risk factor for OS and DFS, leading to a poorer prognosis. Therefore, SMP-ESCC need more rational and effective treatment in the perioperative period.

Perioperative and mid-term outcomes of robotic-assisted versus video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a retrospective propensity-matched analysis of 842 patients.

Comparing the safety, effectiveness, and mid-term survival rates of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) and video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (VAMIE). A total of 842 patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy were analyzed, including 694 patients in VAMIE group and 148 in RAMIE group. PSM analysis was applied to generate matched pairs for further comparison. Operative outcomes, postoperative complications and Mid-term outcomes were compared between all patients in matched groups. After 1:4 PSM, 148 patients in the RAMIE and 592 patients in the VAMIE. Compared to VAMIE, RAMIE exhibited earlier removal of chest and neck drainage tubes, shorter postoperative hospital stays, and a higher number of lymph node dissections. However, the surgical duration of RAMIE was longer than that of VAMIE. Postoperative complications were no statistically significant between the RAMIE and VAMIE groups. There was no statistically significant difference in the 3-year OS and DFS between the two groups. Compared to VAMIE, RAMIE emerges as a viable and safe surgical approach and suggests RAMIE as a potential alternative to minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Clinical efficacy and immune response of neoadjuvant camrelizumab plus chemotherapy in resectable locally advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a phase 2 trial

BackgroundNeoadjuvant immunotherapy is under intensive investigation for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). This study assesses the efficacy and immune response of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (nICT) in ESCC.MethodsIn this phase II trial (ChiCTR2100045722), locally advanced ESCC patients receiving nICT were enrolled. The primary endpoint was the pathological complete response (pCR) rate. Multiplexed immunofluorescence, RNA-seq and TCR-seq were conducted to explore the immune response underlying nICT.ResultsTotally 42 patients were enrolled, achieving a 27.0% pCR rate. The 1-year, 2-year DFS and OS rates were 89.2%, 64.4% and 97.3%, 89.2%, respectively. RNA-seq analysis highlighted T-cell activation as the most significantly enriched pathway. The tumour immune microenvironment (TIME) was characterised by high CD4, CD8, Foxp3, and PD-L1 levels, associating with better pathological regression (TRS0/1). TIME was categorised into immune-infiltrating, immune-tolerant, and immune-desert types. Notably, the immune-infiltrating type and tertiary lymphoid structures correlated with improved outcomes. In the context of nICT, TIM-3 negatively influenced treatment efficacy, while elevated TIGIT/PD-1 expression post-nICT correlated positively with CD8+ T cell levels. TCR-seq identified three TCR rearrangements, underscoring the specificity of T-cell responses.ConclusionsNeoadjuvant camrelizumab plus chemotherapy is effective for locally advanced, resectable ESCC, eliciting profound immune response that closely associated with clinical outcomes.

Clinical outcomes and short-term survival of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy for resectable esophageal cancer: a multi-center retrospective cohort study

Objective: The present retrospective cohort study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy for resectable esophageal cancer and report the preliminary short-term survival. Methods: A multi-center, retrospective study was conducted concerning patients who received neoadjuvant PD-1 agents plus platinum-based chemotherapy between January, 2019 to January, 2022. The primary endpoint was the tumor pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. Results: Two hundred and thirteen patients with initial stage cI-IVA esophageal cancer who received neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy were identified. Complete tumor resection(R0) rate was 99.1%. The pCR rate was 31.9%, and the overall major pathological response rate was 49.8%. The 2-year DFS rate was 78.9% (95%CI: 72.9%-85.4%) and 2-years OS rate was 80.9% (95%CI: 75.3%-86.9%). The incidence of TRAEs and surgical complications rate were 68.5% and 35.2%, respectively. Conclusion: The PD-1 agents combined with chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant treatment for resectable stage I–IVA esophageal cancer had a high pCR rate as well as good short-term survival benefit and tolerable toxicity.

Integrating MRI-based radiomics and clinicopathological features for preoperative prognostication of early-stage cervical adenocarcinoma patients: in comparison to deep learning approach

ObjectivesThe roles of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) -based radiomics approach and deep learning approach in cervical adenocarcinoma (AC) have not been explored. Herein, we aim to develop prognosis-predictive models based on MRI-radiomics and clinical features for AC patients.MethodsClinical and pathological information from one hundred and ninety-seven patients with cervical AC was collected and analyzed. For each patient, 107 radiomics features were extracted from T2-weighted MRI images. Feature selection was performed using Spearman correlation and random forest (RF) algorithms, and predictive models were built using support vector machine (SVM) technique. Deep learning models were also trained with T2-weighted MRI images and clinicopathological features through Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). Kaplan-Meier curve was analyzed using significant features. In addition, information from another group of 56 AC patients was used for the independent validation.ResultsA total of 107 radiomics features and 6 clinicopathological features (age, FIGO stage, differentiation, invasion depth, lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), and lymph node metastasis (LNM) were included in the analysis. When predicting the 3-year, 4-year, and 5-year DFS, the model trained solely on radiomics features achieved AUC values of 0.659 (95%CI: 0.620–0.716), 0.791 (95%CI: 0.603–0.922), and 0.853 (95%CI: 0.745–0.912), respectively. However, the combined model, incorporating both radiomics and clinicopathological features, outperformed the radiomics model with AUC values of 0.934 (95%CI: 0.885–0.981), 0.937 (95%CI: 0.867–0.995), and 0.916 (95%CI: 0.857–0.970), respectively. For deep learning models, the MRI-based models achieved an AUC of 0.857, 0.777 and 0.828 for 3-year DFS, 4-year DFS and 5-year DFS prediction, respectively. And the combined deep learning models got a improved performance, the AUCs were 0.903. 0.862 and 0.969. In the independent test set, the combined model achieved an AUC of 0.873, 0.858 and 0.914 for 3-year DFS, 4-year DFS and 5-year DFS prediction, respectively.ConclusionsWe demonstrated the prognostic value of integrating MRI-based radiomics and clinicopathological features in cervical adenocarcinoma. Both radiomics and deep learning models showed improved predictive performance when combined with clinical data, emphasizing the importance of a multimodal approach in patient management.

Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer with serosa-invasion

Objective: To evaluate the long-term outcomes and prognostic factors of locally advanced gastric cancer with serosa-invasion. Methods: This study is a retrospective cohort study. The clinical and pathological data of 495 patients with locally advanced gastric cancer with serosa-invasion who underwent laparoscopic radical gastrectomy in Department of General Surgery, the First Hospital Affiliated to Army Medical University from October 2012 to October 2018 was analyzed retrospectively. There were 356 males and 139 females with an age (M(IQR)) of 59 (16) years (range: 18 to 75 years). Observation indicators included postoperative results and long-term prognosis. The survival curve was drawn by the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate prognostic analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazards model. Results: Among the 495 patients, a total of 57 patients (11.5%) were lost to follow-up, with a follow-up time of 89 (40) months (range: 23 to 134 months). The 5-year disease-free survival rate (DFS) and the 5-year overall survival rate (OS) were 56.0% and 58.2%, respectively. The 5-year DFS for patients with stage ⅡB, ⅢA, ⅢB, ⅢC were 71.2%, 60.5%, 51.6%, 33.3%, respectively. The 5-year OS for patients with stage ⅡB, ⅢA, ⅢB, ⅢC were 71.2%, 62.2%, 54.1%, 39.3%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that age >65 years (DFS: HR=1.402, 95%CI: 1.022 to 1.922, P=0.036; OS: HR=1.461, 95%CI: 1.057 to 2.019, P=0.022), lymph node dissection number less than 25 (DFS: HR=1.348, 95%CI: 1.019 to 1.779, P=0.036; OS: HR=1.376, 95%CI: 1.035 to 1.825, P=0.028), pathological stage Ⅲ (DFS: HR=2.131, 95%CI: 1.444 to 3.144, P<0.01; OS: HR=2.079, 95%CI: 1.406 to 3.074, P<0.01), and no postoperative chemotherapy (DFS: HR=3.127, 95%CI: 2.377 to 4.113, P<0.01; OS: HR=3.768, 95%CI: 2.828 to 5.020, P<0.01) were independent prognostic factors for the decrease in DFS and OS rates. Conclusions: Laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer with serosa-invasion could achieve satisfactory long-term oncological outcomes. More lymph node dissection and standardized postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy are expected to further improve the prognosis of patients with locally advanced gastric cancer with serous invasion after laparoscopic radical surgery.

Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic surgery for sigmoid colon and rectal cancer: a single-center retrospective study on surgical outcomes and long-term survival.

Although the safety and short-term outcomes of robotic surgery for sigmoid colon and rectal cancer patients are well-documented, there is limited research on the long-term survival outcomes of robotic colorectal surgery. This is a retrospective study that includes 502 patients who underwent either laparoscopic or robotic anterior resection and abdominoperineal resection for rectal or sigmoid colon cancer between August 2016 and September 2021. All patients were diagnosed with rectal or sigmoid colon adenocarcinoma. Propensity score matching (PSM) was implemented to minimize selection bias. Perioperative outcomes, complication rates, and pathological data were evaluated and compared. The 5-year overall survival rate and disease-free survival rate were calculated and compared. Before matching, patients in the robotic group had earlier pathological T and N stages and were more likely to have received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy compared to the laparoscopic group. After matching, most clinicopathological outcomes were similar between the two groups, but the robotic group had longer operative times and a lower conversion rate to open surgery compared with laparoscopic group. After matching for clinical factors, the 5-year DFS rates were 88.19% for the robotic group and 82.46% for the laparoscopic group (P = 0.122), and the OS rates were 90.5% and 79.5% (P = 0.342), showing no significant differences. In the stratified analysis, patients in the robotic surgery group had significantly higher 5-year DFS rates in the following subgroups: age < 65years, TNM stage I-II, received neoadjuvant therapy, and primary tumor located in the rectum. The safety and efficacy of robotic surgery for sigmoid colon and rectal cancer were validated compared to laparoscopic surgery, with both groups of patients exhibiting comparable long-term prognoses.

Re-defining pT4b buccal mucosa squamous cell carcinoma: Looking beyond palliation in select patients

ObjectivesReports in the last 2 decades suggest that selected patients with masticator space invasion can be treated surgically with reasonable survival. This study is an attempt to identify prognosticators for disease free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in surgically treated pT4 buccal mucosa squamous cell carcinoma (BMSCC) patients. Material and methodsThe cohort for this retrospective study comprised 213 patients with pT4a/b BMSCC, treated with curative intent surgery from August 2011 through December 2019. Depending upon masticator space invasion (MSI) patients were divided into 3 groups viz. pT4a, involvement of masseter and/or medial pterygoid (Low MSI) and involvement of lateral pterygoid and/or temporalis (High MSI). ResultsThe median follow-up in this study was 45 (2–123) months. The 5-year DFS was 53 %, 42 % and 21 % for pT4a, Low MSI and high MSI groups, respectively. The 5-year OS was 68 %, 43 % and 21 % for these three groups. The MSI (HR 1.5, p = 0.113 for Low MSI, HR 2.98, p < 0.001 for high MSI), perineural invasion (PNI) (HR 2.17, p = 0.001) and extranodal extension (ENE) (HR 2.74, p = 0.001) predicted poor DFS on multivariate analysis. OS was worse in patients with MSI (HR 1.86, p = 0.020 for Low MSI, HR 3.46, p < 0.001 for high MSI), PNI (HR 2.48, p < 0.001) and ENE (HR 3.02, p = 0.001) on multivariate analysis. Adjuvant treatment improved both OS and DFS. ConclusionSelect patients with masticator space involvement can benefit from aggressive treatment. Radiation with or without chemotherapy in adjuvant setting can further improve prognosis in these patients.

Prognostic significance of negative lymph node count in microsatellite instability-high colorectal cancer

BackgroundMicrosatellite instability-high (MSI-H) tumors, with elevated tumor mutational burden and expression of neoantigens, represent a distinct immune-activated subpopulation in colorectal cancer (CRC), characterized by strong lymph node reaction, locally advanced tumor and higher total lymph nodes harvested (TLN), but less metastatic lymph nodes and fewer incidence of III-IV stage. Host immune response to tumor and lymph nodes may be an important prognostic factor. However, N stage and LNR (Lymph-Node Ratio) have limitations in predicting the prognosis of MSI-H patients. Negative lymph node count (NLC) provided a more precise representation of immune activation status and extent of tumor metastasis. The study aims to detect prognostic significance of NLC in MSI-H CRC patients, and compare it with N stage, TLN and LNR.MethodsRetrospective data of 190 consecutive MSI-H CRC patients who received curative resection were collected. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan–Meier method. Clinicopathological variables including NLC, N stage, TLN and LNR were studied in univariate and multivariate COX regression analyses. ROC (receiver operating characteristic curve) and concordance index were employed to compare the differences in predictive efficacy between NLC, N stage, TLN and LNR.ResultsPatients with increased NLC experienced a significantly improved 5-years DFS and OS in Kaplan–Meier analysis, univariate analysis, and multivariate analysis, independent of potential confounders examined. Increased NLC corresponded to elevated 5-years DFS rate and 5-years OS rate. AUC (area under curve) and concordance index of NLC in DFS and OS predicting were both significantly higher than N stage, TLN and LNR.ConclusionsNegative lymph node is an important independent prognostic factor for MSI-H patients. Reduced NLC is associated with tumor recurrence and poor survival, which is a stronger prognostic factor than N stage, TLN and LNR.

Significance of Measurable Residual Disease in Adult Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive ALL: A GRAAPH-2014 Study.

BCR::ABL1 quantification is widely regarded as the standard for monitoring measurable residual disease (MRD) in Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) ALL. However, recent evidence of BCR::ABL1 multilineage involvement questions the significance of BCR::ABL1 MRD. We aimed to define the prognostic role of MRD as assessed by BCR::ABL1 or lymphoid-specific immunoglobulin/T-cell receptor (IG/TR) gene markers. We conducted BCR::ABL1 and IG/TR quantification after each treatment cycle in 264 patients treated in the GRAAPH-2014 trial, which used four cycles of reduced-intensity chemotherapy with nilotinib, followed by hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT). Comparing BCR::ABL1 and IG/TR MRD revealed residual BCR::ABL1-positive non-ALL cells in 98 (43%) of 228 patients, defining multilineage Ph+ ALL. Despite poorer BCR::ABL1 responses, patients with multilineage Ph+ ALL had similar disease-free survival (DFS; hazard ratio [HR], 0.83 [95% CI, 0.49 to 1.41]; P = .50). Although BCR::ABL1 response failed to predict outcomes, IG/TR positivity (≥0.01%) was strongly associated with lower DFS (after cycle 2, HR, 2.49 [95% CI, 1.40 to 4.40]; P = .002; after cycle 4, HR, 4.13 [95% CI, 1.82 to 9.38]; P = .001). In multivariable analysis, both IG/TR positivity after cycle 2 and initial WBC count ≥30 × 109/L predicted poorer DFS, enabling to define a high-risk group having a 4-year DFS of 56.5% compared with 87.6% (HR, 3.72 [95% CI, 1.93 to 7.15]; P < .001). Moreover, allogeneic HSCT significantly improved DFS in the high-risk group (HR, 0.33 [95% CI, 0.18 to 0.60]; P < .001), whereas the standard-risk group had favorable outcomes regardless of allogeneic HSCT. Our findings challenge the significance of BCR::ABL1 monitoring in adult Ph+ ALL and demonstrate the prognostic role of IG/TR MRD. This study provides a framework for using MRD to guide treatment strategies in adults with Ph+ ALL.