5-year Cancer-specific Mortality Rates Research Articles

Survival of stage III non-seminoma testis cancer patients versus simulated controls, according to race/ethnicity.

It is unknown whether 5-year overall survival (OS) differs and to what extent between the American Joint Committee on Cancer stage III non-seminoma testicular germ cell tumor (NS-TGCT) patients and simulated age-matched male population-based controls, according to race/ethnicity groups. We identified newly diagnosed (2004-2014) stage III NS-TGCT patients within the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database 2004-2019. For each case, we simulated an age-matched male control (Monte Carlo simulation), relying on Social Security Administration (SSA) Life Tables with 5 years of follow-up. We compared OS rates between stage III NS-TGCT patients and simulated age-matched male population-based controls, according to race/ethnicity groups (Caucasian, Hispanic, Asian/Pacific Islander and African American). Both, cancer-specific mortality (CSM) and other-cause mortality (OCM) were computed. Of 2054 stage III NS-TGCT patients, 60% were Caucasians versus 33% Hispanics versus 4% Asians/Pacific Islanders versus 3% African Americans. The 5-year OS difference between stage III NS-TGCT patients versus simulated age-matched male population-based controls was highest in Asians/Pacific Islanders (64 vs. 99%, Δ = 35%), followed by African Americans (66 vs. 97%, Δ = 31%), Hispanics (72 vs. 99%, Δ = 27%), and Caucasians (76 vs. 98%, Δ = 22%). The 5-year CSM rate was highest in Asians/Pacific Islanders (32%), followed by African Americans (26%), Hispanics (25%), and Caucasians (20%). The 5-year OCM rate was highest in African Americans (8%), followed by Caucasians (4%), Asians/Pacific Islanders (4%), and Hispanics (2%). Relative to SSA Life Tables, the highest 5-year OS disadvantage applied to stage III NS-TGCT Asian/Pacific Islander race/ethnicity group, followed by African American, Hispanic and Caucasian, in that order.

Regional Differences in Stage III Nonseminoma Germ Cell Tumor Patients Across SEER Registries

PurposeWe investigated regional differences in patients with stage III nonseminoma germ cell tumor (NSGCT). Specifically, we investigated differences in baseline patient, tumor characteristics and treatment characteristics, as well as cancer-specific mortality (CSM) across different regions of the United States. MethodsUsing the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2004-2018), patient (age, race/ethnicity), tumor (International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group [IGCCCG] prognostic groups) and treatment (systemic therapy and retroperitoneal lymph dissection [RPLND] status) characteristics were tabulated for stage III NSGCT patients, according to 12 SEER registries representing different geographic regions. Multinomial regression models and multivariable Cox regression models testing for cancer-specific mortality (CSM) were used. ResultsIn 3,174 stage III NSGCT patients, registry-specific patient counts ranged from 51 (1.5%) to 1630 (51.3%). Differences across registries existed for age (12%-31% for age 40+), race/ethnicity (5%-73% for others than non-Hispanic whites), IGCCCG prognostic groups (24%-43% vs. 14-24% vs. 3%-20%, in respectively poor vs. intermediate vs. good prognosis), systemic therapy (87%-96%) and RPLND status (12%-35%). After adjustment, clinically meaningful inter-registry differences remained for systemic therapy (84%-97%) and RPLND (11%-32%). Unadjusted 5-year CSM rates ranged from 7.1% to 23.3%. Finally in multivariable analyses addressing CSM, 2 registries exhibited more favorable outcomes than SEER registry of reference (SEER Registry 12): SEER Registry 4 (Hazard Ratio (HR): 0.36) and SEER Registry 9 (HR: 0.64; both P = .004). ConclusionWe identified important regional differences in patient, tumor and treatment characteristics, as well as CSM which may be indicative of regional differences in quality of care or expertise in stage III NGSCT management.

Predicting cancer-specific mortality in T1/2 hepatocellular carcinoma after radiofrequency ablation by competing risk nomogram: A population-based analysis

BackgroundRadiofrequency ablation (RFA) is one of the primary treatment methods for T1/2 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but the risk factors after RFA remain controversial. This study aims to identify the key factors associated with cancer-specific mortality (CSM) in patients with T1/2 HCC after RFA using competing risk analysis and to establish a prognostic nomogram for improved clinical management. MethodsA total of 2,135 T1/2 HCC patients treated with RFA were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and randomly categorized into training and validation sets. Univariate and multivariable competing risk analyses were performed to identify risk factors associated with CSM and construct a competing risk nomogram. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, concordance indices (C-indexes), calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were conducted to evaluate the predictive efficiency and clinical applicability of the nomogram in the training and validation sets. Patients were stratified according to their nomogram score, and the different risk groups were compared using cumulative incidence function (CIF) curves and Gray's validation . ResultsThe 5-year CSM rate for HCC patients treated with RFA was 30.1 %. Grade, tumor size, tumor number, cirrhosis, and AFP level were identified as independent risk factors for CSM. A prognostic nomogram was developed based on these risk factors. The time-dependent C-indexes (0.65) were greater than those of the AJCC stage model (0.55) during the 12 to 60 months of follow-up. The calibration plots of the competing risk nomograms demonstrated excellent consistency between actual survival and nomogram predictions. ROC analyses showed that the 1-, 3-, and 5-year AUC values in both the training and validation cohorts were all greater than 0.63 and exceeded those of the AJCC stage model. DCA demonstrated the clinical usefulness of the nomogram. Patients were classified into low-, moderate-, and high-risk groups based on the nomogram scores, with the high-risk group showing significantly higher CSM rates after RFA compared to the other two groups. ConclusionsWe identified Grade, AFP, cirrhosis, tumor size, and tumor number as independent risk factors associated with CSM. The competing risk nomogram exhibited high performance in predicting the probability of CSM for HCC patients undergoing RFA.

Differences in Survival of Clear Cell Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma According to Partial vs. Radical Cytoreductive Nephrectomy

BackgroundIt is unknown whether previously reported other-cause mortality (OCM) advantage of partial cytoreductive nephrectomy (PCN) vs. radical cytoreductive nephrectomy (RCN) still applies to contemporary clear cell metastatic renal cell carcinoma (ccmRCC) patients. Materials and MethodsWe relied on the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database (2004-2019) to identify ccmRCC patients treated with PCN and RCN. Temporal trends of PCN rates within the SEER database were tabulated. After propensity score matching (PSM), cumulative incidence plots depicted 5-year OCM and cancer-specific mortality (CSM) of PCN and RCN patients. Multivariable Cox regression models tested for differences between PCN vs. RCN. ResultsOf 5149 study patients, 237 (5%) underwent PCN vs. 4912 (95%) RCN. In the SEER database 2004 to 2019, rates of PCN in ccmRCC patients increased from 3.0% to 8.0% (estimated annual percent change [EAPC]: 3.0%; P = .04). After PSM, 5-year OCM rates were 2.4 vs. 7.5% for respectively PCN vs. RCN patients (P = .036). 5-year CSM rates were 50.8 vs. 53.6% for respectively PCN and RCN patients (P = .57). In multivariable Cox regression models, PCN was associated with lower OCM (Hazard Ratio (HR): 0.39; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.18-0.84; P = .02) but did not affect CSM rates (HR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.76-1.29; P = .96). ConclusionsWe confirm the existence of OCM advantage after PCN vs. RCN in contemporary ccmRCC patients.

African American vs. Caucasian race/ethnicity in adrenocortical carcinoma patients.

In some primaries African American race/ethnicity predisposes to higher stage and worse survival. We tested for differences in cancer specific mortality (CSM) and other-cause mortality (OCM) in patients with adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) according to African American vs. Caucasian race/ethnicity. We hypothesized that African Americans present with higher tumor stage and grade, do not receive the same treatment and benefit of lower survival than Caucasians. Within Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, we identified 1016 ACC patients: 123 (12.1%) African Americans vs. 893 (87.9%) Caucasians. Propensity score matching (age, sex, marital status, grade, T, N and M stages, treatment type), cumulative incidence plots Poisson-smoothing and competing risk regression (CRR) were used. Compared to Caucasians, African Americans were more frequently unmarried (56.9% vs. 35.5%, p < 0.001). No clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences were observed for age, grade, T, N, and M stages, as well as for treatment type (all p > 0.05). After propensity score matching (1:4), 123 African Americans and 492 Caucasians remained and were included in CRR analysis. In multivariable CRR models, CSM and OCM rates were not different between the two race/ethnicities (hazard ratio: 0.84, p = 0.3). In African Americans five-year CSM rates were 31.2% and 75.3% in respectively European Network for the Study of Adrenal Tumors (ENSAT) stages I-II and III-IV vs. 32.9% and 75.4% in Caucasians. Overall five-year OCM rates were 11.0% vs. 10.1% in respectively African Americans and Caucasians. Unlike other primaries, in ACC African American race/ethnicity is not associated with higher disease stage at initial diagnosis or worse survival.

Development and validation of a prognostic model based on SEER data for patients with esophageal carcinoma after esophagectomy

To develop a nomogram to predict the long-term survival of patients with esophageal cancer following esophagectomy. We collected the data of 7215 patients with esophageal carcinoma from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database during the period from 2004 and 2016. Of these patients, 5052 were allocated to the training cohort and the remaining 2163 patients to the internal validation cohort using bootstrap resampling, with another 435 patients treated in the Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery of Jinling Hospital between 2014 and 2016 serving as the external validation cohort. In the overall cohort, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year cancer-specific mortality rates were 14.6%, 35.7% and 41.6%, respectively. Age (≥80 years vs < 50 years, P < 0.001), gender (male vs female, P < 0.001), tumor site (lower vs middle segment, P=0.013), histology (EAC vs ESCC, P=0.012), tumor grade (poorly vs well differentiated, P < 0.001), TNM stage (Ⅳ vs Ⅰ, P < 0.001), tumor size (> 50 mm vs 0-20 mm, P < 0.001), chemotherapy (yes vs no, P < 0.001), and LNR (> 0.25 vs 0, P < 0.001) were identified as independent risk factors affecting long-term survival of the patients. The nomograms established based on the model for predicting the survival probability of the patients at 1, 3 and 5 years after operation showed a C-index of 0.726 (95% CI: 0.714-0.738) for predicting the overall survival (OS) and of 0.735 (95% CI: 0.727-0.743) for cancer-specific survival (CSS) in the training cohort. In the internal validation cohort, the C-index of the nomograms was 0.752 (95% CI: 0.738-0.76) for OS and 0.804 (95% CI: 0.790-0.817) for CSS, as compared with 0.749 (95% CI: 0.736-0.767) and 0.788 (95%CI: 0.751-0.808), respectively, in the external validation cohort. The nomograms also showed a higher sensitivity than the TNM staging system for predicting long-term prognosis. This prognostic model has a high prediction efficiency and can help to identify the high-risk patients with esophageal carcinoma after surgery and serve as a supplement for the current TNM staging system.

Association of Open vs Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy With Mortality and Perioperative Outcomes Among Patients With Bladder Cancer in Sweden

Mortality rates resulting from bladder cancer have remained unchanged for more than 30 years. The surgical community has put hope in robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with intracorporeal urinary diversion (ICUD) in an effort to improve surgical outcomes and bladder cancer survival without strong supporting evidence. To evaluate perioperative, safety, and survival outcome differences between RARC with ICUD and open radical cystectomy (ORC). This nationwide population-based cohort study used data from the Swedish National Register of Urinary Bladder Cancer and population-based Cause of Death Register, which includes clinical information on tumor characteristics, treatment, and survival and covers approximately 97% of patients with urinary bladder cancer in Sweden. All patients who underwent radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in any hospital between January 2011 and December 2018 were included. Follow-up data were collected until December 2019. Data analysis was conducted from June to December 2020. RARC or ORC. The main outcomes were all-cause and cancer-specific mortality between RARC and ORC, compared using propensity score matching. Secondary outcomes were differences in perioperative outcomes after the different surgical approaches. Throughout the observation period, 889 patients underwent RARC and 2280 patients underwent ORC at 24 Swedish hospitals. The median (IQR) age was 71 (66-76) years and 2386 patients (75.3%) were men. After a median (IQR) follow-up of 47 (28-71) months, the 5-year cancer-specific mortality rates were 30.2% (variance, 1.59) for ORC and 27.6% (variance, 3.12) for RARC, and the overall survival rates were 57.7% (variance, 2.46) for ORC and 61.4% (variance, 5.11) for RARC. In the propensity score-matched analysis, RARC was associated with a lower all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.56-0.89; P = .004). Compared with ORC, RARC was associated with a lower estimated blood loss (median [IQR] 150 [100-300] mL vs 700 [400-1300] mL; P < .001), intraoperative transfusion rate (odds ratio [OR], 0.05; 95% CI, 0.03-0.08; P < .001), and shorter length of stay (median [IQR], 9 [6-13] days vs 13 [10-17] days; P < .001), and with a higher lymph node yield (median [IQR], 20 [15-27] lymph nodes vs 14 [8-24] lymph nodes; P < .001) and 90-day rehospitalization rate (OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.02-1.60; P = .03). The RARC group, compared with the ORC group had lower risk of Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher complications (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.43-0.87; P = .009). These findings suggest that compared with ORC, RARC with ICUD was associated with a lower overall mortality rate, fewer high-grade complications, and more favorable perioperative outcomes.

Cancer-specific mortality after radical prostatectomy vs external beam radiotherapy in high-risk Hispanic/Latino prostate cancer patients

PurposeTo test for differences in cancer-specific mortality (CSM) rates in Hispanic/Latino prostate cancer patients according to treatment type, radical prostatectomy (RP) vs external beam radiotherapy (EBRT).MethodsWithin the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2010–2016), we identified 2290 NCCN (National Comprehensive Cancer Network) high-risk (HR) Hispanic/Latino prostate cancer patients. Of those, 893 (39.0%) were treated with RP vs 1397 (61.0%) with EBRT. First, cumulative incidence plots and competing risks regression models tested for CSM differences after adjustment for other cause mortality (OCM). Second, cumulative incidence plots and competing risks regression models were refitted after 1:1 propensity score matching (according to age, PSA, biopsy Gleason score, cT-stage, cN-stage).ResultsIn NCCN HR patients, 5-year CSM rates for RP vs EBRT were 2.4 vs 4.7%, yielding a multivariable hazard ratio of 0.37 (95% CI 0.19–0.73, p = 0.004) favoring RP. However, after propensity score matching, the hazard ratio of 0.54 was no longer statistically significant (95% CI 0.21–1.39, p = 0.2).ConclusionWithout the use of strictest adjustment for population differences, NCCN high-risk Hispanic/Latino prostate cancer patients appear to benefit more of RP than EBRT. However, after strictest adjustment for baseline patient and tumor characteristics between RP and EBRT cohorts, the apparent CSM benefit of RP is no longer statistically significant. In consequence, in Hispanic/Latino NCCN high-risk patients, either treatment modality results in similar CSM outcome.

Early-Onset Colorectal Adenocarcinoma in the IDEA Database: Treatment Adherence, Toxicities, and Outcomes With 3 and 6 Months of Adjuvant Fluoropyrimidine and Oxaliplatin.

Early-onset (EO) colorectal cancer (CRC, age < 50 years) incidence is increasing. Decisions on optimal adjuvant therapy should consider treatment adherence, adverse events, and expected outcomes in a population with life expectancy longer than later-onset (LO) CRC (age ≥ 50 years). Individual patient data from six trials in the International Duration Evaluation of Adjuvant Chemotherapy database were analyzed. Characteristics, treatment adherence, and adverse events in stage II or III EO-CRC and LO-CRC were compared. To reduce confounders of non-cancer-related deaths because of age or comorbidities, time to recurrence (3-year relapse-free rate) and cancer-specific survival (5-year cancer-specific mortality rate) were considered. Out of 16,349 patients, 1,564 (9.6%) had EO-CRC. Compared with LO-CRC, EO-CRC had better performance status (86% v 80%, P < .01), similar T stage (% T1-3/T4: 76/24 v 77/23, P = .97), higher N2 disease rate (24% v 22%, P < .01), more likely to complete the planned treatment duration (83.2% v 78.2%, P < .01), and received a higher treatment dose intensity, especially with 6-month regimens. Gastrointestinal toxicity was more common in EO-CRC; hematologic toxicity was more frequent in LO-CRC. Compared with LO-CRC, significantly worse cancer-specific outcomes were demonstrated especially in high-risk stage III EO-CRC: lower 3-year relapse-free rate (54% v 65%; hazard ratio [HR] 1.33; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.55; P value < .001) and higher 5-year cancer-specific mortality rate (24% v 20%; HR 1.21; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.47; P value < .06). In this subgroup, no difference was observed with 3 or 6 months of therapy, with equally poor disease-free survival rates (57% v 56%; HR 0.97; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.29; P value = .85). Young age is negatively prognostic in high-risk stage III CRC and associated with significantly higher relapse rate; this is despite better treatment adherence and higher administered treatment intensity, suggesting more aggressive disease biology.

Cancer-specific survival after radical prostatectomy versus external beam radiotherapy in high-risk and very high-risk African American prostate cancer patients.

To test for differences in cancer-specific mortality (CSM) rates between radical prostatectomy (RP) vs external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) high-risk African American patients, as well as Johns Hopkins University (JHU) high-risk and very high-risk patients. Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2010-2016), we identified 4165 NCCN high-risk patients, of whom 1944 (46.7%) and 2221 (53.3%) patients qualified for JHU high-risk or very high-risk definitions. Of all 4165 patients, 1390 (33.5%) were treated with RP versus 2775 (66.6%) with EBRT. Cumulative incidence plots and competing risks regression models addressed CSM before and after 1:1 propensity score matching between RP and EBRT NCCN high-risk patients. Subsequently, analyses were repeated separately in JHU high-risk and very high-risk subgroups. Finally, all analyses were repeated after landmark analyses were applied. In the NCCN high-risk cohort, 5-year CSM rates for RP versus EBRT were 2.4 versus 5.2%, yielding a multivariable hazard ratio of 0.50 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.30-0.84, p = 0.009) favoring RP. In JHU very high-risk patients 5-year CSM rates for RP versus EBRT were 3.7 versus 8.4%, respectively, yielding a multivariable hazard ratio of 0.51 (95% CI: 0.28-0.95, p = 0.03) favoring RP. Conversely, in JHU high-risk patients, no significant CSM difference was recorded between RP vs EBRT (5-year CSM rates: 1.3 vs 1.3%; multivariable hazard ratio: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.16-1.90, p = 0.3). Observations were confirmed in propensity score-matched and landmark analyses adjusted cohorts. In JHU very high-risk African American patients, RP may hold a CSM advantage over EBRT, but not in JHU high-risk African American patients.

The first competing risk survival nomogram in patients with papillary renal cell carcinoma

There is still a lack of competing risk analysis of patients with papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) following surgery. We performed the cumulative incidence function (CIF) to estimate the absolute risks of cancer-specific mortality (CSM) and other-cause mortality (OCM) of pRCC over time, and constructed a nomogram predicting the probability of 2-, 3- and 5-year CSM based on competing risk regression. A total of 5993 pRCC patients who underwent nephrectomy between 2010 and 2016 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The 2-, 3-, 5-year CSM rates were 3.2%, 4.4% and 6.5%, respectively, and that of OCM were 3.2%, 5.0% and 9.3%, respectively. The estimates of 5-year cumulative mortality were most pronounced among patients aged > 75 years in OCM (17.0%). On multivariable analyses, age, tumor grade, T stage, N stage, and with or without bone, liver and lung metastases were identified as independent predictors of CSM following surgery and were integrated to generate the nomogram. The nomogram achieved a satisfactory discrimination with the AUCt of 0.730 at 5-year, and the calibration curves presented impressive agreements. Taken together, age-related OCM is a significant portion of all-cause mortality in elderly patients and our nomogram can be used for decision-making and patient counselling.

Adherence to guideline recommendations for multimodality treatment of patients with pT2-3 M0 non-urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder: Temporal trends and survival outcomes.

To analyze contemporary multimodality treatment rates, defined as radical cystectomy plus chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, for pT2-3 any N-stage M0 non-urothelial carcinoma of urinary bladder patients. Additionally, we tested for the effect of multimodality treatment versus radical cystectomy alone on cancer-specific mortality. Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database (2004-2015), 887 pT2-3 any N-stage M0 non-urothelial carcinoma of urinary bladder patients treated with radical cystectomy were identified. Kaplan-Meier plots, and univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses focused on cancer-specific mortality rates. Squamous cell carcinoma was recorded in 499 (56.3%) patients, neuroendocrine carcinoma in 246 (27.7%) and adenocarcinoma in 142 (16.0%). The highest proportion of multimodality treatment patients was recorded in neuroendocrine carcinoma (69.1%), relative to adenocarcinoma (34.5%) and squamous cell carcinoma (26.4%). A statistically significant annual increase was recorded in multimodality treatment rates in neuroendocrine carcinoma patients (46.7-74.2%, P<0.01), but not in adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma patients. The 5-year cancer-specific mortality rate in neuroendocrine carcinoma patients was significantly lower after multimodality treatment versus radical cystectomy alone (37.0% vs 51.5%; P<0.01), but no statistically significant differences were recorded in both adenocarcinoma (46.1% vs 35.5%; P=0.8) and squamous cell carcinoma (41.4% vs 31.1%; P=0.8) patients. In multivariable analyses, for neuroendocrine carcinoma patients, multimodality treatment was an independent predictor of a lower cancer-specific mortality rate (hazard ratio 0.58, P=0.03). Multimodality treatment has been increasingly used during the study period in neuroendocrine carcinoma patients, and it has translated into a cancer-specific mortality benefit. This is not the case for other non-urothelial carcinoma of urinary bladder patients, such as adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma.

Survival comparison of Three histological subtypes of lung squamous cell carcinoma: A population-based propensity score matching analysis

ObjectivesThis study is aimed to analyze the survival differences among patients with lung basaloid squamous cell carcinoma (BSCC), keratinizing squamous cell carcinoma (KSCC), and nonkeratinizing squamous cell carcinoma (NKSCC), and explore the prognostic factors of patients with lung BSCC. Materials and MethodsWe searched the information of 4743 patients with lung SCC between 2005 and 2014 from the SEER database. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust confounding factors. The overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and cumulative incidence of cancer-specific mortality (CSM) were estimated with a comparative analysis. A competing risks regression model was conducted to identify the prognostic factors of lung BSCC. ResultsAfter PSM, patients with lung BSCC had a higher CSS rate than those with lung KSCC or NKSCC (5-year CSS rate: 50.4 % vs. 37.7 % vs. 38.5 %, p = 0.033 and p = 0.033). The cumulative incidence of CSM was lower for patients with lung BSCC than those with lung KSCC or NKSCC (5-year CSM rate: 46.4 % vs. 56.9 % vs. 56.4 %, p = 0.046 and p = 0.042), which were similar to the results before PSM. As for patients with lung KSCC and NKSCC, there was no survival differences between them (5-year CSS rate: 37.7 % vs. 38.5 %, p = 0.997). The competing risks regression analysis showed that T stage, N stage, M stage and surgery were independent prognostic factors for patients with lung BSCC (all p < 0.05). ConclusionsPatients with lung BSCC had a better survival than those with lung KSCC or NKSCC, while no survival differences were found between lung KSCC and NKSCC. T stage, N stage, M stage and surgery were independent prognostic factors for patients with lung BSCC.

Impact of Tumor Size on Cancer-Specific Mortality Rate After Local Tumor Ablation in T1a Renal-Cell Carcinoma.

Introduction: Institutional studies suggested that tumor size (TS) might be an independent predictor of recurrence after local tumor ablation (LTA). However, limited data exist to ascertain whether a larger TS may also predispose to a worse cancer-specific mortality (CSM) rate. Materials and Methods: Patients treated with LTA for T1a nonmetastatic renal-cell carcinoma were identified within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2004-2015). Estimated annual percentage change (EAPC) methodology, cumulative incidence plots, and multivariable competing risk regression (CRR) models before and after the 1:1 ratio propensity score (PS) adjustment were used to compare LTA for TS ≤30 mm vs TS >30 mm. A comparison of cryosurgery vs thermal ablation according to TS was also performed. Results: Of 3946 LTA patients, 2974 (75.3%) patients harbored TS ≤30 mm vs 972 (24.7%) harbored TS >30 mm. The latter was significantly older (median age 67 years vs 71 years, p < 0.001), compared with TS ≤30 mm. No differences were recorded in annual rates over time. In unmatched CRR models, after adjustment for other-cause mortality (OCM) rate, LTA for TS >30 mm showed a worse 5-year CSM rate (hazard ratio [HR] 2.3, p < 0.001), relative to TS ≤30 mm. In PS- and OCM rate-adjusted CRR models, LTA for TS >30 mm still showed a worse 5-year CSM rate (HR 2.86, p < 0.001), relative to TS ≤30 mm. Thermal ablation was associated with a higher 5-year CSM rate, compared with cryosurgery (7.6% vs 3.9%, p = 0.02), but only when TS was >30 mm. Conclusions: TS >30 mm is an independent predictor of higher 5-year CSM rates in patients treated with LTA, even after adjustment for OCM rate. In consequence, when LTA is considered, it ideally should be performed for TS ≤30 mm.

Endometrial cancer in the elderly: does age influence surgical treatments, outcomes, and prognosis?

To compare clinicopathological characteristics, surgical outcomes, and survival rates for nonelderly (<75 years old) and elderly (≥75 years old) women with endometrial cancer (EC). This retrospective study included consecutive patients who underwent surgery for EC at the gynecologic-oncologic surgery department of Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou (Paris, France) from January, 2002 to December, 2015. Independent-group t tests and chi-square tests were used to compare elderly and nonelderly women. Survival rates were compared using log-rank (Mantel-Cox) tests. In the nonelderly and elderly groups, the mean age at EC diagnosis was 63 (range 33-74) and 81 (range 75-95) years, respectively. Compared with nonelderly patients, elderly patients (n = 104) presented with more advanced disease and more aggressive histological findings. However, surgical approaches did not differ between the two groups, and 76% of all patients underwent minimally invasive surgery. Pelvic lymphadenectomy was performed in 65% and 44% of nonelderly and elderly patients, respectively (P = 0.01), whereas para-aortic lymphadenectomy was performed in 26% and 9% of nonelderly and elderly patients, respectively (P < 0.0001). The incidence of perioperative complications was almost the same in the elderly and nonelderly groups. The 5-year disease-free survival rate was higher in the nonelderly group (P = 0.023), and the 5-year cancer-specific mortality rate was higher in the elderly group (P = 0.042). Although elderly patients present with cancers that are more aggressive, the management of EC in this population is not optimal. Further clinical studies need to be conducted for elderly women with EC, and specific treatment guidelines should be developed to improve their prognosis.

Quality of diagnostic staging in patients with bladder cancer: a process-outcomes link.

Muscle sampling is often used as a surrogate for staging quality in patients with bladder cancer. The association of staging quality at diagnosis and survival was examined among patients with bladder cancer. The clinical records of all individuals within the Los Angeles Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry with an incident diagnosis of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer in 2004-2005 were reviewed. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, staging quality (presence of muscle in the specimen and mention of muscle in the pathology report), and vital status were recorded. With mixed-effects and competing-risks regression analyses, the association of patient and tumor characteristics with staging quality and cancer-specific survival was quantified. The sample included 1865 patients, 335 urologists, and 27 pathologists. Muscle was reported to be present in 972 (52.1%), was reported to be absent in 564 (30.2%), and was not mentioned in 329 (17.7%) of the initial pathology reports. The presence of muscle did not differ according to the grade or depth of invasion. Mortality was associated with staging quality (P < .05). Among patients with high-grade disease, the 5-year cancer-specific mortality rates were 7.6%, 12.1%, and 18.8% when muscle was present, absent, and not mentioned, respectively. The omission of muscle in the specimen or its mention in the pathology report in nearly half of all diagnostic resections was associated with increased mortality, particularly in patients with high-grade disease. Because urologists cannot reliably discern between high- and low-grade or Ta and T1 disease, it is contended that patients with bladder cancer should undergo adequate muscle sampling at the time of endoscopic resection.

Small renal cell carcinomas – How dangerous are they really? Results of a large multicenter study

Aim of the studyModern diagnostic ultrasound and cross-sectional imaging has enabled the detection of increasing numbers of renal tumours. The aim of this study was to investigate the tumour- and patient-specific characteristics and prognosis of small renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) after surgical resection. MethodsThe study included 2197 patients who underwent surgical resection of histologically confirmed RCC ⩽4cm between 1990 and 2011. Median (mean) follow-up was 56.2 (65.5) months. ResultsAt the time of surgery, tumours were staged as pT⩾3a in 175 (8.0%) cases, 134 (6.2%) were poorly differentiated and 75 (3.5%) were metastasised. The larger the tumour size, the higher was the risk of presenting with stage pT⩾3a (p<0.001), poor tumour differentiation (p=0.004), microscopic vascular involvement (p=0.001) and collecting system invasion (p=0.03). The 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) rate was 93.8% for stage pT1a versus 79.4% for stage pT⩾3a (p<0.001), and it was 93.7% for G1–2 versus 76.8% for G3–4 differentiation (p<0.001). Multivariate analysis identified age in years (hazard ratio (HR) 1.04, p<0.001), metastatic disease (HR 12.5, p<0.001), tumour differentiation (HR 2.8, p<0.001) and non-clear cell histology (HR 0.51, p=0.02) as independent prognosticators for CSS in patients with small RCC. Interestingly, the 5-year cancer-specific mortality rate for pT1a N/M0 patients was 5.8%. ConclusionsThis large multicenter study has clearly shown that, though most small RCC have a low pathological stage and a good prognosis, there is also a small but significant subgroup of these tumours that are already locally advanced or poorly differentiated.

Increasing Use of Radical Prostatectomy for Nonlethal Prostate Cancer in Sweden

The number of patients in Sweden treated with radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer has increased exponentially. The extent to which this increase reflects treatment of nonlethal disease detected through prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening is unknown. We undertook a nationwide study of all 18,837 patients with prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy in Sweden from 1988 to 2008 with complete follow-up through 2009. We compared cumulative incidence curves, fit Cox regression and cure models, and conducted a simulation study to determine changes in treatment of nonlethal cancer, in cancer-specific survival over time, and effect of lead-time due to PSA screening. The annual number of radical prostatectomies increased 25-fold during the study period. The 5-year cancer-specific mortality rate decreased from 3.9% [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.5-5.3] among patients diagnosed between 1988 and 1992 to 0.7% (95% CI, 0.4-1.1) among those diagnosed between 1998 and 2002 (P(trend) < 0.001). According to the cure model, the risk of not being cured declined by 13% (95% CI, 12%-14%) with each calendar year. The simulation study indicated that only about half of the improvement in disease-specific survival could be accounted for by lead-time. Patients overdiagnosed with nonlethal prostate cancer appear to account for a substantial and growing part of the dramatic increase in radical prostatectomies in Sweden, but increasing survival rates are likely also due to true reductions in the risk of disease-specific death over time. Because the magnitude of harm and costs due to overtreatment can be considerable, identification of men who likely benefit from radical prostatectomy is urgently needed.

Assessment of Cancer Control Outcomes in Patients With High-risk Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated With Partial Nephrectomy

To test whether cancer control outcomes justify the consideration of partial nephrectomy in patients with large tumors (Stage pT2 or greater) or high-grade tumors (Fuhrman grade III-IV) or lesions extending beyond the kidney (Stage pT3a). We abstracted the data for 8847, 11 547, and 5232 patients with tumors >7 cm, Fuhrman grade III-IV, and Stage T3a from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, respectively. All were treated with either partial nephrectomy or radical nephrectomy from 1988 to 2008. The 2- and 5-year cancer-specific mortality rates were compared between the partial nephrectomy and radical nephrectomy groups after propensity score matching. Separate multivariate analyses were conducted within each subcohort and specifically quantified the effect of partial nephrectomy on cancer-specific mortality. For each of the 3 examined groups, the patients treated with partial nephrectomy failed to demonstrate statistically significant cancer-specific mortality differences relative to radical nephrectomy patients. The hazard ratio for the tumors >7 cm, Fuhrman grade III-IV, and Stage pT3a was 0.67 (95% confidence interval 0.39-1.17, P = .2), 0.81 (95% confidence interval 0.58-1.12, P = .21), and 0.99 (95% confidence interval 0.61-1.61, P = 1.0). Even in patients with adverse pathologic features, partial nephrectomy does not compromise cancer-specific mortality. This implies that when functional outcomes are considered in patients with high-risk features, the decision to perform partial nephrectomy should not depend on the stage or grade, but rather on the technical ability to remove the tumor with a negative margin and provide sufficient functional renal remnant.

648 TUMOR GRADE IMPROVES THE ABILITY OF THE PROGNOSTIC ABILITY OF AJCC STAGES IN PATIENTS WITH PENILE CARCINOMA

You have accessJournal of UrologyPenis/Testis/Urethra: Benign & Malignant Disease II1 Apr 2010648 TUMOR GRADE IMPROVES THE ABILITY OF THE PROGNOSTIC ABILITY OF AJCC STAGES IN PATIENTS WITH PENILE CARCINOMA Rodolphe Thuret, Claudio Jeldres, Lars Budäus, Giovanni Lughezzani, Daniel Liberman, Maxine Sun, Jean-Jacques Patard, Sharokh F. Shariat, Markus Graefen, Francesco Montorsi, Paul Perrotte, and Pierre Karakiewicz Rodolphe ThuretRodolphe Thuret Montpellier, France, Metropolitan More articles by this author , Claudio JeldresClaudio Jeldres Montreal, Canada More articles by this author , Lars BudäusLars Budäus Hamburg, Germany More articles by this author , Giovanni LughezzaniGiovanni Lughezzani Milano, Italy More articles by this author , Daniel LibermanDaniel Liberman Montreal, Canada More articles by this author , Maxine SunMaxine Sun Montreal, Canada More articles by this author , Jean-Jacques PatardJean-Jacques Patard Rennes, France, Metropolitan More articles by this author , Sharokh F. ShariatSharokh F. Shariat Montreal, Canada More articles by this author , Markus GraefenMarkus Graefen Hamburg, Germany More articles by this author , Francesco MontorsiFrancesco Montorsi Milano, Italy More articles by this author , Paul PerrottePaul Perrotte Montreal, Canada More articles by this author , and Pierre KarakiewiczPierre Karakiewicz Montreal, Canada More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.02.1022AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES The AJCC or TNM staging of penile carcinoma represents a standard and is widely used in clinical practice. We examined the ability of tumor grade that currently is not considered in the AJCC or TNM staging, to improve the prognostic ability of these two established staging schemes. METHODS We relied on a population of 1577 penile carcinoma patients stages T1-4 N0-3 M0 who underwent an excision biopsy or partial or radical penectomy with or without a lymph node dissection. Separated Cox regression models were fitted for AJCC stages I to III (stage 0 not considered), T and N stages, as well as for T and N stages with tumor grade (grades I vs. II vs. III-IV). Harrell's concordance index was quantified for each of the three tested schemes. RESULTS Overall, 194 patients died of penile carcinomas and the 5-year cancer-specific mortality rate was 16.1% (95% CI=14.0 to 18.4%). The accuracy of AJCC staging in the prediction of cancer-specific mortality-free survival was 68.3% versus 70.0% for TN-based prediction (Mantel-Haenszel test, p<0.001) versus 72.0% for T and N and grade-based prediction (Mantel-Haenszel test, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS The AJCC staging stratifies non-metastatic penile cancer patients into three distinct categories versus 16 categories for the combination of T1-4 and N0-3 stages versus 48 categories for the combination of T1-4, N0-3 and Grade 1-3 stage and grade combination. The prognostic accuracy of the AJCC staging schemes was the lowest versus an intermediate value for the TN-based scheme versus the highest for the TN and grade-based scheme. The superior prognostic ability of the TN and grade-based scheme suggests that grade should be routinely considered when the T and N stages are used for prediction of prognosis. © 2010 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 183Issue 4SApril 2010Page: e254 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2010 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Rodolphe Thuret Montpellier, France, Metropolitan More articles by this author Claudio Jeldres Montreal, Canada More articles by this author Lars Budäus Hamburg, Germany More articles by this author Giovanni Lughezzani Milano, Italy More articles by this author Daniel Liberman Montreal, Canada More articles by this author Maxine Sun Montreal, Canada More articles by this author Jean-Jacques Patard Rennes, France, Metropolitan More articles by this author Sharokh F. Shariat Montreal, Canada More articles by this author Markus Graefen Hamburg, Germany More articles by this author Francesco Montorsi Milano, Italy More articles by this author Paul Perrotte Montreal, Canada More articles by this author Pierre Karakiewicz Montreal, Canada More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...