5-year Biochemical Disease-free Survival Research Articles

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Cancer.

Prostate cancer is the second- leading cause of cancer death among men. We aimed to evaluate high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), open radical prostatectomy (ORP), robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), and external beam radiation therapy (RT) in the treatment of localized low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. We searched bibliographic databases for case-control, cohort, and randomized controlled studies. We used MeSH subject headings and free text terms for prostate cancer, HIFU, ORP, RARP, RT, failure-free survival (FFS), biochemical disease-free survival (BDFS), urinary incontinence (UI), and erectile dysfunction (ED). Fourteen studies were included in the review, for a total of 34 927 participants. Among the 8 studies of HIFU as the primary treatment of localized low- and intermediate- risk prostate cancer, 4 studies reported 5-year FFS rates ranging from 67.8% to 97.8%, 3 studies reported 5-year BDFS ranging from 58% to 85.4%, 5 studies reported 1-year UI rates ranging from 0% to 6%, and 4 studies reported 1-year ED rates ranging from 11.4% to 38.7%. Furthermore, our search revealed a 5-year FFS benefit favoring ORP compared to RT, a 1-year UI rate favoring ORP compared to RARP, and a 1-year ED rate favoring ORP compared to RARP. Our systematic review and meta-analysis revealed lack of studies with active comparators comparing HIFU to standard of care (ORP, RARP, or RT) in primary treatment of localized low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Open radical prostatectomy has favorable efficacy outcomes compared to RT, while RARP has beneficial functional outcomes compared to ORP, respectively.

Dosimetric Parameters Predictive of Treatment-Related Toxicity in High Dose-Rate Brachytherapy as Monotherapy for Prostate Cancer.

High dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy as monotherapy is an effective treatment for patients with low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer and is increasingly being offered as a 2-fraction protocol. There is a lack of consensus on the optimal dosimetric planning parameters to use, or whether there is any benefit summating dosimetric parameters from more than one implant. Our goal is to determine planning parameters associated with disease control, toxicity and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Data were collected on 83 patients with low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer who received 2 fractions of 13.5 Gy HDR brachytherapy without androgen-deprivation therapy as part of a randomized phase II clinical trial. An in-house deformable, registration algorithm was used to co-register and dose-summate the plans from both implants for each patient. Acute and late GU and GI toxicities were measured using CTCAE 4.0 and HRQOL was measured in urinary, bowel, sexual and hormonal domains using the EPIC scores. Treatment efficacy was assessed through PSA measurement and imaging with or without biopsy where indicated. Covariates included baseline clinical factors, disease characteristics and treatment dosimetric parameters. Cox proportional hazards was performed to evaluate covariates impact on treatment toxicity and efficacy, and logistic regression analysis evaluated covariates impact on HRQOL. Among the 83 patients, median prostate volume was 46.7cm3. Median summated planning target volume receiving 100% prescription dose (PTV V100%) was 97.4%, median PTV V150% 42.4% and median PTV V200% 15.5%. Median highest dose to the 1cm3 rectum (D1cc) was 66.9% of the prescription dose and median rectum V80% was 0.008cm3. Median urethral D1cc was 99.0% of the prescription dose, median urethral Dmax 121.7% and median urethral D10% 116.2%. Grade ≥2 GI toxicity was uncommon (3.7% acute and 8.5% late), but grade ≥2 GU toxicity was reported in 73.2% (acute) and 46.3% (late) patients. Rectum D1cc and V80% were found to be significantly associated with grade 2 or higher acute GI toxicity, while use of a-blocker at baseline was associated with grade ≥2 acute GU toxicity. Similarly, use of a-blocker was associated with late grade ≥2 GU toxicity, but with no dosimetric associations. No other variables were associated with treatment-related toxicities. Only rectum D1cc was significantly associated with changes in bowel EPIC scores. Estimated 5-year biochemical disease-free survival was 93.9% and 5-year cumulative incidence of local failure was 3.8%. HDR monotherapy with 27 Gy delivered in 2 fractions in treatment of prostate cancer is well tolerated with high rates of disease control and minimal toxicity. Dose summation between 2 fractions of HDR brachytherapy is feasible, with rectal dose predicting acute GI toxicity. The lack of association between dose metrics and urinary toxicity raises the potential for further dose escalation.

5-Years Analysis of Effectivity and Toxicity of Ultra-Hypofractionated Proton Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Low- and Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer-A Retrospective Analysis.

We retrospectively analyzed the 5-year biochemical disease-free survival (bDFS) and occurrence of late toxicity in prostate cancer patients treated with pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton radiotherapy. In the period from January 2013 to June 2018, 853 patients with prostate cancer were treated with an ultra-hypofractionated schedule (36.25 GyE/five fractions). The mean PSA value was 6.7 (0.7-19.7) µg/L. There were 318 (37.3%), 314 (36.8%), and 221 (25.9%) patients at low (LR), favorable intermediate (F-IR), and unfavorable intermediate risk (U-IR), respectively. Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy was administered to 197 (23.1%) patients, and 7 (0.8%) patients had adjuvant hormonal therapy. The whole group of patients reached median follow-up time at 62.7 months, and their mean age was 64.8 (40.0-85.7) years. The bDFS rates and late toxicity profile were evaluated. Median treatment time was 10 (7-38) days. Estimated 5-year bDFS rates were 96.5%, 93.7%, and 91.2% for low-, favorable intermediate-, and unfavorable intermediate-risk groups, respectively. Cumulative late toxicity (CTCAE v4.0) of G2+ was as follows: gastrointestinal (GI)-G2: 9.1%; G3: 0.5%; genitourinary (GU)-G2: 4.3%, and no G3 toxicity was observed. PSA relapse was observed in 58 (6.8%) patients: 16 local, 22 lymph node, 4 bone recurrences, and 10 combined sites of relapse were detected. Throughout the follow-up period, 40 patients (4.7%) died, though none due to prostate cancer. Ultra-hypofractionated proton beam radiotherapy is an effective treatment for low- and favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer, with long-term bDFS rates comparable to other techniques. It is promising for unfavorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer and has acceptable long-term GI and favorable GU toxicity.

Novel Prognostic Index of High-Risk Prostate Cancer Using Simple Summation of Very High-Risk Factors.

Simple SummaryWe explored the role of each very high-risk factor and found that simple summation of the number of very high-risk (VHR) factors (T3b–4 and Gleason score 9–10) is an easy and very high predictive power to separate VHR-2 (both T3b–4 and Gleason score 9–10) and others (VHR-1; T3b–4 or Gleason score 9–10, VHR-0; none of T3b–4 and Gleason score 9–10). The VHR-2 group showed a strikingly lower biochemical control rate and distant metastasis free survival rate than other groups, resulting in higher prostate cancer specific mortality than the VHR-1 and VHR-0 groups.This study aimed to examine the role of very high-risk (VHR) factors (T3b–4 and Gleason score 9–10) for prognosis of clinically localized high-risk prostate cancer. We reviewed multi-institutional retrospective data of 1413 patients treated with radiotherapy (558 patients treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and 855 patients treated with brachytherapy (BT) ± EBRT. We introduced an index by simple summation of the number of VHR factors—VHR-0, VHR-1, and VHR-2. With median follow-up of 69.6 months, the 5-year biochemical disease free survival rate (bDFS), prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMSF) rates were 59.4%, 7.65%, and 83.2% for the VHR-2 group, respectively; 86.7%, 1.50%, and 95.4% for the VHR-1 group, respectively; and 93.1%, 0.12%, and 98.2% for the VHR-0 group, respectively. The VHR-2 group had significantly worse bDFS, PCSM, and DMSF than the VHR-0 (hazard ratios: 4.55, 9.607, and 7.904, respectively) and VHR-1 (hazard ratios: 1.723, 2.391, and 1.491, respectively) groups. The VHR-2 group could be identified as a super high-risk group compared with other groups, and could be a good candidate for clinical trials using multimodal intensified treatments. Simple summation of the number of VHR factors is an easy and useful predictive index for bDFS, PCSM, and DMSF.

Ultrahypofractionated Proton Radiation Therapy in the Treatment of Low and Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer-5-Year Outcomes.

To analyze the 5-year biochemical disease-free survival (bDFS) and late toxicity profile in patients with prostate cancer treated with pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton radiation therapy. Between January 2013 and March 2016, 284 patients with prostate cancer were treated using intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT), with an ultrahypofractionated schedule (36.25 GyE in 5 fractions). Five patients were immediately lost from follow-up and thus were excluded from analysis. Data for 279 patients were prospectively collected and analyzed with a median follow-up time of 56.5 (range, 3.4-87.5) months. The mean age at time of treatment was 64.5 (40.1-85.7) years, and the median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value was 6.35 μg/L (0.67-17.3 μg/L). A total of 121 (43.4%) patients had low-risk, 125 patients (44.8%) had favorable, and 33 (11.8%) unfavorable intermediate-risk cancer. In addition, 49 (17.6%) patients underwent neoadjuvant hormonal therapy, and no patients had adjuvant hormonal therapy. bDFS and late toxicity profiles were evaluated. The median treatment time was 9 days (range, 7-18 days). The 5-year bDFS was 96.9%, 91.7%, and 83.5% for the low-, favorable, and unfavorable intermediate-risk group, respectively. Late toxicity (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v.4) was as follows: gastrointestinal: grade 1, 62 patients (22%), grade 2, 20 patients (7.2%), and grade 3, 1 patient (0.36%); genitourinary: grade 1, 80 patients (28.7%), grade 2, 14 patients (5%), and grade 3, 0 patients. PSA relapse was observed in 17 patients (6.1%), and lymph node or bone recurrence was detected in 11 patients. Four (1.4%) local recurrences were detected. Nine patients (3.2%) died of causes unrelated to prostate cancer. No deaths related to prostate cancer were reported. Ultrahypofractionated proton beam radiation therapy for prostate cancer is effective with long-term bDFS comparable with other fractionation schedules and with minimal serious long-term GI and GU toxicity.

Radiotherapy for Clinically Localized T3b or T4 Very-High-Risk Prostate Cancer-Role of Dose Escalation Using High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy Boost or High Dose Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy

Simple SummaryRecently, high-risk prostate cancer was subdivided to a very-high-risk group considered to have the worst prognosis, including clinical stage T3b–T4, primary Gleason pattern 5, or more than four biopsy cores with Gleason score 8–10. Among these, T3b–T4 stage is a special interest in radiotherapy because of their wider target volume outside the prostate. We examined this subgroup and found that dose escalation in radiotherapy both with brachytherapy or intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) improved biochemical free survival rate but not in prostate cancer specific survival rate and overall survival rate.To examine the efficacy of dose escalating radiotherapy into patients with cT3b or T4 localized prostate cancer, we compared Group A (86 conventional dose external beam radiotherapy: EBRT group, treated with 70–72 Gy) and group B (39 high dose EBRT group (HDEBRT group, 74–80 Gy) and 124 high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR) + EBRT (HDR boost)) using multi-institutional retrospective data. The actuarial 5-year biochemical disease-free survival (bDFS) rate, prostate cancer specific survival rate (PSS), and overall survival rate (OS) were 75.8%, 96.8%, and 93.5%. Group B showed superior 5-year bDFS rate (81.2%) as compared to the group A (66.5%) (p < 0.0001) with a hazard ratio of 0.397. Equivocal 5-year PSS (98.3% and 94.8% in group B and group A) and OS (both 93.7%) were found between those groups. Accumulated late grade ≥ 2 toxicities in gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts were similar among those three groups. Therefore, both HDEBRT and HDR boost could be good options for improving the bDFS rate in cT3–T4 localized prostate cancer without affecting PSS and OS.

A systematic review of salvage focal therapies for localised non-metastatic radiorecurrent prostate cancer.

Although radiotherapy to the prostate for cancer is effective, recurrence occurs in 10–15% within 5 years. Traditional salvage treatments for men with radiorecurrent prostate cancer comprise of watchful waiting (WW) with or without androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) or radical prostatectomy (RP). Neither strategy provides ideal therapeutic ratios. Salvage focal ablation is an emerging option. We performed a systematic review of the Medline and Embase databases for studies reporting outcomes of focal salvage brachytherapy (sBT), cryotherapy (sCT) or high-intensity focused ultrasound (sHIFU) for radiorecurrent prostate cancer (conception to April 2019). Results were screened for inclusion against predetermined eligibility criteria. Certain data were extracted, including rates of biochemical disease-free survival (BDFS), metastasis, conversion to second-line therapies and adverse events. Of a total 134 articles returned from the search, 15 studies (14 case series and 1 comparative study) reported outcomes after focal sBT [5], sCT [7] and sHIFU [3]. Cohort size varied depending on intervention, with eligible studies of sBT being small case series. Median follow-up ranged from 10 to 56 months. Although pre-salvage demographics were similar [median age range, 61–75 years; prostate-specific antigen (PSA) range, 2.8–5.5 ng/mL], there was heterogeneity in patient selection, individual treatment protocols and outcome reporting. At 3 years, BDFS ranged from 61% to 71.4% after sBT, 48.1–72.4% after sCT and 48% after sHIFU. Only studies of sCT reported 5-year BDFS, which ranged from 46.5% to 54.4%. Rates of metastasis were low after all salvage modalities, as were conversion to second-line therapies (although this was poorly reported). Grade 3 adverse events were rare. This systematic review indicates that salvage focal ablation of radiorecurrent prostate cancer provides acceptable oncological outcomes and is well tolerated. Unfortunately, there is heterogeneity in the study design of existing evidence. Level 1 research comparing salvage focal therapies to existing whole-gland strategies is needed to further establish the role of these promising treatments.

Prostate high dose-rate brachytherapy as monotherapy for low and intermediate risk prostate cancer: Efficacy results from a randomized phase II clinical trial of one fraction of 19 Gy or two fractions of 13.5 Gy

Background and purposeHigh dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy as monotherapy is a treatment option for localized prostate cancer, but optimal dose and fractionation is unknown. We report efficacy results of a randomized phase II trial of HDR monotherapy delivered as either one or two fractions. Materials and methodsEligible patients had low or intermediate risk prostate cancer, prostate volume <60 cc, and no androgen deprivation use. 170 patients were randomized to receive HDR as either a single fraction of 19 Gy or as two fractions of 13.5 Gy one week apart. Median age was 65 years, median PSA was 6.33 ng/ml, and Grade Group 1, 2 and 3 was present in 28%, 60%, and 12%, respectively. There was no difference in baseline factors between arms and 19%, 51% and 30% had low risk, favourable intermediate and unfavourable intermediate risk disease, respectively. The Phoenix definition was used to define biochemical failure, all local failures were confirmed by biopsy and toxicity was assessed using CTCAE v.4. ResultsMedian follow-up was 60 months. PSA decreased more quickly in the 2-fraction arm (p = 0.009). Median PSA at 5-years was 0.65 ng/ml in the single fraction and 0.16 ng/ml in the 2-fraction arm. The 5-year biochemical disease-free survival and cumulative incidence of local failure was 73.5% and 29% in the single fraction arm and 95% (p = 0.001) and 3% (p < 0.001) in the 2-fraction arm, respectively. Recurrence was not associated with initial stage, grade group, or risk group. Grade 2 late rectal toxicity occurred in 1% while the incidence of grade 2 and 3 urinary toxicity was 45% and 1%, respectively, with no difference between arms. ConclusionsHDR monotherapy delivered as two fraction of 13.5 Gy is well tolerated with a high cancer control rate at 5 years. Single fraction monotherapy is inferior and should not be used.

Phase I Trial of Weekly Cabazitaxel with Concurrent Intensity Modulated Radiation and Androgen Deprivation Therapy for the Treatment of High-Risk Prostate Cancer

Cabazitaxel has been demonstrated to improve the overall survival for men with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer. The purpose of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose for concurrent cabazitaxel with androgen deprivation and intensity modulated radiation therapy in men with high-risk prostate cancer. Twenty men were enrolled in this institutuional review board-approved phase I clinical trial using a 3 + 3 design. Patients were followed prospectively for safety, efficacy, and health-related quality of life (Expanded Prostate Index Composite). Efficacy was assessed biochemically using the Phoenix definition. With a median follow-up time of 56 months, the maximum tolerated dose of concurrent cabazitaxel was 6 mg/m2. The 5-year biochemical disease-free survival was 73%, despite 75% of patients having very high risk prostate cancer per the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. Four patients were unable to complete chemotherapy owing to dose-limiting toxicities (eg, rectal bleeding, diarrhea, and elevated transaminase). There was no significant minimally important difference in Expanded Prostate Index Composite patient-reported outcomes for either the urinary or bowel domains; however, there was a significant decrease in the sexual domain. This is the first clinical trial of prostate cancer to report on the combination of cabazitaxel and radiation therapy. The maximum tolerated dose of concurrent cabazitaxel with radiation and androgen deprivation therapy was determined to be 6 mg/m2. Despite the aggressive nature of the disease, robust biochemical control was observed.

Retreatment for Local Recurrence of Prostatic Carcinoma After Prior Therapeutic Irradiation: Efficacy and Toxicity of HDR-Like SBRT

We evaluated the use of high dose-rate-like stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) retreatment for biopsy-proven local persistence in prostate postradiation therapy, evaluating efficacy and toxicity. From 2009 to 2018, 50 patients with biopsy-proven recurrent prostate cancer >2 years after prior treatment were retreated with a high dose-rate-like dose of 3400 cGy over 5 fractions. Previous radiation therapy dose measured 75.6 Gy (64.8-81.0) and median salvage interval was 8.1 years (32-241 mo.). Eighty-three percent of patients had Gleason score 7 or higher disease at retreatment. Those with preexisting toxicity >grade 1 from their prior course were excluded. The planning target volume was comprised of the clinical target volume (prostate + any contiguous extension only) with no additional expansion. Toxicity assessment used CTCAE v.3.0 criteria. Median follow-up was 44 months (3-110). Median pre-SBRT salvage baseline prostate specific antigen (PSA) of 3.97 ng/mL decreased to 0.6 ng/mL and 0.16 ng/mL at 1 and 5 years in nonrelapsed patients, respectively. Actuarial 5-year biochemical disease-free survival (DFS) measured 60%, with corresponding 5-year actuarial local, distant, and salvage androgen deprivation therapy free rates of 94%, 89%, and 69%, respectively. Actuarial 5-year biochemical DFS measured 78% if PSA at salvage was <6.92 ng/mL versus 12% with ≥6.92 ng/mL (P = .0001). Toxicity was primarily in the GU domain, with an 8% 5-year actuarial rate of grade 3+, 3% when limited to salvage of "conventional external beam only" local relapse. No gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity >grade 1 occurred. Of the 30% sexually potent at the time of salvage, 82% subsequently lost potency. SBRT salvage of local prostate recurrence in previously irradiated patients appears clinically feasible in this challenging group. It demonstrates favorable PSA and DFS response, typically deferring the need for salvage androgen deprivation therapy or other treatment by over 5 years, with low GU and GI toxicity.

High Dose-Rate Prostate Brachytherapy as Monotherapy: a Single Fraction May Not be Enough

Fractionated high dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy as monotherapy provides high cancer control rates for men with low and intermediate risk prostate cancer. Based on radiobiological modelling, a single fraction of 19 Gy was predicted to provide similar outcomes. Our purpose is to report clinical and biochemical control rates with 19 Gy x 1 or 13.5 Gy x 2 in a single centre randomized trial. Eligible patients had NCCN low or intermediate risk disease, a prostate volume < 60 cc, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) of 18 or less and no use of androgen deprivation therapy. Patients were randomized to receive either 19 Gy HDR as a single fraction (1F), or 27 Gy in 2 fractions one week apart (2F). Treatment was delivered using an out-patient ultrasound-based technique. Relative dosimetry was similar between arms with median prostate V100, V150, V200 and D90 of 97%, 35%, 11.4% and 110%, respectively. Follow-up with toxicity assessment, physical examination and serum prostate specific-antigen (PSA) level occurred at week 6, week 12, every 3 months for the first year, every 6 months until year 5, and annually thereafter. Biochemical failure was defined as nadir + 2 ng/ml. Rising PSA was investigated with CT, MRI, bone scan and in some cases PSMA PET. Local recurrence was confirmed by biopsy. A total of 170 patients were randomized between June 2013 and April 2015: 87 to 1F and 83 to 2F arms. Median age was 65 years, median PSA was 6.3 ng/ml and 72% had Gleason 7 cancer. NCCN low, favourable intermediate and unfavourable intermediate was present in 28%, 49% and 23%, respectively, with similar distribution between arms. Median follow-up was 51 months (range 24-68 months). PSA decreased more rapidly in the 2F arm, with median PSA at 5 years of 0.75 and 0.21 ng/ml in the 1F and 2F arms, respectively. Clinical or biochemical failure occurred in 22 patients – 20 in the 1F arm and 2 in the 2F arm, with a 5-year biochemical disease-free survival of 74.5% and 97.3%, respectively (Log Rank p=0.002). Most recurrences were local (16/20) in the 1F arm, while only one of the recurrences in the 2F arm had a local component. The 5-year cumulative incidence of local failure was 25.7% in the 1F and 2.6% in the 2F arm (p<0.0001). Of the local failures, 14 underwent salvage treatments: 7 with brachytherapy, 6 with prostatectomy and 1 with HIFU. On Cox analysis, biochemical failure was not associated with clinical stage, risk group, Gleason or baseline PSA. Distant metastases-free survival was 98% at 5 years. Despite linear quadratic considerations, single fraction 19 Gy is inferior to two fractions of 13.5 Gy, which appears to be highly effective. Single fraction 19 Gy is associated with an unacceptable rate of local failure. As recurrence is predominantly at the site of initial bulk disease, further dose escalation either focally to the dominant nodule or to the whole gland may be considered in a clinical trial.

Salvage reirradiation for local prostate cancer recurrence after radiation therapy. For who? When? How?

PurposeLiterature review reporting results of salvage brachytherapy and stereotactic body radiotherapy for prostate recurrence only after radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Materials and methodsA total of 38 studies (including at least 15 patients per study) were analysed: 19 using low-dose-rate brachytherapy, nine high-dose-rate brachytherapy and ten stereotactic body radiotherapy. Only five studies were prospective. The median numbers of patients were 30 for low-dose-rate brachytherapy, 34 for high-dose-rate brachytherapy, and 30 for stereotactic body radiotherapy. The median follow-up were 47months for low-dose-rate brachytherapy, 36months for high-dose-rate brachytherapy and 21months for stereotactic body radiotherapy. ResultsLate genitourinary toxicity rates ranged, for grade 2: from 4 to 42% for low-dose-rate brachytherapy, from 7 to 54% for high-dose-rate brachytherapy and from 3 to 20% for stereotactic body radiotherapy, and for grade 3 or above: from 0 to 24% for low-dose-rate brachytherapy, from 0 to 13% for high-dose-rate brachytherapy and from 0 to 3% for grade 3 or above (except 12% in one study) for stereotactic body radiotherapy. Late gastrointestinal toxicity rates ranged, for grade 2: from 0 to 6% for low-dose-rate brachytherapy, from 0 to 14% for high-dose-rate brachytherapy and from 0 to 11% for stereotactic body radiotherapy, and for grade 3 or above: from 0 to 6% for low-dose-rate brachytherapy, and from 0 to 1% for high-dose-rate brachytherapy and stereotactic body radiotherapy. The 5-year biochemical disease-free survival rates ranged from 20 to 77% for low-dose-rate brachytherapy and from 51 to 68% for high-dose-rate brachytherapy. The 2- and 3-year disease-free survival rates ranged from 40 to 82% for stereotactic body radiotherapy. Prognostic factors of biochemical recurrence have been identified. ConclusionDespite a lack of prospective data, salvage reirradiation for prostate cancer recurrence can be proposed to highly selected patients and tumours. Prospective comparative studies are needed.

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Locally Recurrent Prostatic Carcinoma after Prior Therapeutic Irradiation: Prostate-Specific Antigen Response, Disease-Free Survival, and Toxicity

Salvage success with acceptable toxicity has been reported with high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy in patients with locally recurrent adenocarcinoma of the prostate following prior radiation therapy (RT), though limitations include invasiveness and scarce availability in some regions. We prospectively evaluated PSA response, disease-free survival and toxicity using “HDR-like” prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) local salvage treatment. From 2/09 to 1/18, 50 patients with biopsy-proven local recurrent prostate cancer post-RT were enrolled in this IRB-approved trial and 47 treated. Pre-existing RT toxicity > grade 1 was an exclusion criteria. Median interval to SBRT salvage was 88 months post-RT (range 32-180) and 43/47 patients had prior “conventional fractionation only” RT, the remainder had brachytherapy, SBRT or post-radical prostatectomy plus prostate bed RT. Median recurrence Gleason score was 7 (34% ≥ 8). MRI-defined prostate volume plus any extraprostatic extension comprised the planning target volume (PTV). 34 Gy/5 fractions were given, delivering HDR-like intraprostatic dose escalation (Dmax ≥ 150% of prescribed). Concomitant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), though not encouraged, was not specifically prohibited. 7/47 treated patients had ADT in addition to salvage SBRT. Toxicities were assessed using CTCAE v. 3.0. A total of 47 treated patients had a median 36-month follow-up (range, 0–96; 34 patients followed ≥ 1 year). Median pre-salvage SBRT baseline PSA of 3.7 ng/mL decreased to 0.1 ng/mL & <0.1 ng/mL by 2 and 5 years, respectively, excluding patients with relapse. Actuarial 2- and 5-year biochemical disease free survival (bDFS) measured 80% & 66%, respectively. Excluding the 7 patients treated with ADT resulted in a 2% decrease in 2-year bDFS, no change in the 5-year bDFS and no change in the 2- and 5-year median PSA result. RT toxicity > grade 1 was limited to the GU domain, with actuarial 19% grade 2+ and 9% grade 3+ rates by 5 years. Limiting the analysis to salvage of “conventional fractionation only” RT failures, grade 3+ GU toxicity incidence decreased to 3%. No acute or chronic GI toxicity > Grade 1 occurred. Post-SBRT salvage bDFS to 5 years is encouraging and appears comparable to published HDR brachytherapy results. The PSA response kinetic appears similar to that seen in de novo patients treated with SBRT; though with early biochemical relapse seen more commonly in this group (≤ 2 years out). Grade ≥ 3 SBRT-induced GU toxicity was rare in post “conventional fractionation only” SBRT salvage cases, appearing more frequently in the small subset treated after other prior RT situations (e.g. – post-brachytherapy). There was no serious GI toxicity in this series. SBRT salvage of post-radiotherapeutic local recurrence appears feasible, with larger patient numbers and longer median follow-up required to confirm this result. With IRB approval, the protocol has been expanded to a sample size n = 100 and the study continues.

Oligorecurrent Nodal Prostate Cancer: Long-term Results of an Elective Nodal Irradiation Approach.

The objective of this study was to report long-term results of elective nodal radiotherapy (ENRT) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients with oligorecurrent nodal disease after primary treatment. Data of 53 oligorecurrent PCa patients (N1 and/or M1a) with ≤5 nodal metastases (n=108) treated with ENRT combined with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) between 2004 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and PSA doubling time (DT) were 3.4 ng/mL and 5 months, respectively. At restaging, 45% of the patients presented single nodal metastases, mainly located in the pelvis (n=38). All patients underwent ENRT between 45 and 50.4 Gy with a boost on positive nodes (median 64.4 Gy; 54 to 69 Gy) using mainly VMAT (n=24) or IMRT (n=21) techniques. Concomitant ADT was administered to all patients for a median time of 6 months. After a median follow-up after ENRT of 44 months (range, 2 to 133), the 5-year biochemical disease-free and distant progression-free survival (DPFS) rates were 43% and 58%, respectively, with worse DPFS observed in patients with a PSA-doubling time <3 months (36.8% vs. 63.6%; P=0.029). Seventeen of 19 clinically relapsing patients presented lesions out of the ENRT field, and 10 were again oligometastatic. Only 2 patients presented with a CTCAE v3.0 grade ≥2 genitourinary toxicity. ENRT combined with short-course ADT is a safe and effective salvage modality for patients with oligorecurrent nodal PCa. Prospective randomized studies comparing focal SBRT versus ENRT are warranted to define the best treatment strategy.

Tailored postoperative treatment of prostate cancer: final results of a phase I/II trial

BackgroudThe European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) trial 22,911 reported 74% 5-year biochemical disease-free survival (bDFS) in patients with prostate carcinoma treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) followed by postoperative radiotherapy (RT). This study aimed to improve these outcomes by using a combined-intensified-modulated-adjuvant treatment, including RT and hormone therapy (HT) after RP.Materials and methodsThis phase I/II trial treatment was designed to improve 5-year bDFS from ~ 75 to 90%. Patients were consecutively enrolled using the following inclusion criteria: age < 80 years, histological diagnosis of prostate adenocarcinoma without known metastases, stage pT2-4N0-1, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–2. All patients had at least one of these pathologic features: capsular perforation, positive surgical margins, seminal vesicle invasion, and pelvic lymph nodes involvement. A minimum dose of 64.8 Gy to the tumor bed was delivered in all patients. Depending on tumor characteristics at diagnosis, patients received a higher dose (70.2 Gy; 85.4%) and/or prophylactic pelvic lymph nodes irradiation (57.7%) and/or HT (69.1%). Biochemical relapse was defined as two consecutive rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values > 0.2 ng/ml.ResultsA total of 123 patients were enrolled in the study and completed the scheduled treatment. Median preoperative and postoperative PSA were: 8.8 and 0.06 ng/mL, respectively. The percentages of patients with pathologically involved nodes and positive resection margins were: 14.6% and 58.5%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 67 months (range: 37–120 months), the actuarial 5-year bDFS, local control, metastasis-free survival, and overall survival (OS) were: 92.9%, 98.7%, 96.1%, and 95.1%, respectively.ConclusionA higher 5-year bDFS (92.9%) was recorded compared to studies based on standard adjuvant RT, even though patients with nodal disease and detectable postoperative PSA were enrolled. Clinical end points, as long-term disease-free survival and OS, will require further assessments. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03169933)

Effect on cryoablation of high-risk and locally recurrent prostate cancer: a Meta-analysis

Objective: To discuss the curative effect and prognosis of cryoablation to high-risk and locally recurrent prostate cancer patients. Methods: Cryoablation related publications and relevant references were searched for potential pertinent articles until March, 2016.Articles were selected according to the exclusion criteria, Stata ver.11 was used to perform the statistical analysis. Results: 5-year biochemical disease-free survival of salvage ablation for prostate cancer was 45%(95% CI 0.43-0.47), in salvage radiotherapy of 45% (95% CI 0.44-0.47). The 5-year biochemical disease-free survival of high-risk prostate cancer cryoablation was 66%(95% CI 0.64-0.67). The result of high-risk prostate cancer radiotherapy and EBRT were respectively 61%(95% CI 0.60-0.63) and 54% (95% CI 0.52-0.56). Conclusions: The five-year biochemical recurrence of salvage cryoablation is similar to salvage radiotherapy. For high-risk prostate cancer, cryoablation shows an advantage than traditional EBRT radiation.

Salvage high-dose-rate brachytherapy for locally recurrent prostate cancer after primary radiotherapy failure

Background and purposeTo evaluate high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR BT) as a salvage modality for locally recurrent prostate cancer after primary radiotherapy failure. Materials and methodsEighty-three prostate cancer patients, who locally relapsed after radiotherapy, were treated with salvage HDR BT. The schedule was three implantations, every two weeks, with 10Gy per implant, to a total dose of 30Gy. Acute and late toxicity rates were evaluated. Overall survival (OS) and biochemical control were calculated using Kaplan–Meier method. ResultsMedian follow-up after salvage HDR was 41months. The 3-year and 5-year OS were 93% and 86%, respectively. The 3-year and 5-year biochemical disease-free survival (bDFS) were 76% and 67%, respectively. The single factor associated with biochemical control was time to achieve salvage PSA nadir (p-.006). OS was linked significantly with primary nadir level (p-.001) while primary biochemical relapse interval was of borderline significance (p-.07). ConclusionsSalvage HDR BT is a promising treatment option for patients with localized relapse of previously irradiated prostate cancer. Lower PSA nadir after primary radiotherapy and longer primary disease-free interval influence the outcome.

Focal salvage therapy for local prostate cancer recurrences after primary radiotherapy: a comprehensive review

Background/AimPatients with locally recurrent prostate cancer after primary radiotherapy can be eligible for salvage treatment. Whole-gland salvage techniques carry a high risk of toxicity. A focal salvage approach might reduce the risk of adverse events while maintaining cancer control in carefully selected patients. The aim of this review was to evaluate current literature to assess whether focal salvage leads to a comparable or favourable recurrence rate and less toxicity compared to whole-gland salvage.MethodsA literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library. A total of 3015 articles were screened and assessed for quality. Eight papers [on focal cryoablation (n = 3), brachytherapy (n = 3) and high-intensity focused ultrasound (n = 2)] were used to report outcomes.ResultsOne-, 2-, 3- and 5-year biochemical disease-free survival (BDFS) ranges for focal salvage are, respectively, 69–100, 49–100, 50–91 and 46.5–54.5 %. Severe genitourinary, gastrointestinal and sexual function toxicity rates are 0–33.3 %. One study directly compares focal to whole-gland salvage cryotherapy, showing 5-year BDFS of, respectively, 54.4 and 86.5 % with lower toxicity rates for focal salvage patients.ConclusionProvisional data suggest that BDFS rates of focal salvage are in line with those of whole-gland approaches. There is evidence that focal salvage could decrease severe toxicity and preserve erectile function.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00345-016-1811-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Definitive radiotherapy plus regional hyperthermia for high-risk and very high-risk prostate carcinoma: Thermal parameters correlated with biochemical relapse-free survival

Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of definitive radiotherapy (RT) plus regional hyperthermia (HT) and investigate the potential contribution of HT to clinical outcomes in patients with prostate carcinoma. Materials and methods: Following our institution’s treatment protocol, HT was combined with RT to improve clinical outcomes in selected patients with high-risk or very high-risk prostate cancer. Data from 82 patients treated with RT plus HT and 64 patients treated with RT alone were retrospectively analysed. Results: Median follow-up duration was 61 months. The 5-year biochemical disease-free survival (bDFS) rate for the 82 patients treated with RT plus HT was 78%, whereas bDFS for the 64 patients treated with RT alone was 72%; this difference was not significant. Among the 75 patients treated with RT plus HT who underwent intra-rectal temperature measurements, higher thermal parameters were significant prognostic indicators of improved bDFS by univariate analysis. A higher CEM43 °CT90 thermal parameter and a T stage of T1–2 were significant prognostic factors based on multivariate analysis. The 5-year bDFS rates for the 40 patients with a higher CEM43 °CT90 and the 64 patients treated with RT alone were significantly different, whereas 5-year bDFS for the 35 patients with a lower CEM43 °CT90 and the 64 patients treated with RT alone were not. Conclusions: The addition of HT with higher thermal parameters to RT may improve bDFS for patients with high-risk or very high-risk prostate cancer. These findings also demonstrate the importance of careful selection of treatable patients with higher thermal parameters.

High-dose radiotherapy with short-term or long-term androgen deprivation in localised prostate cancer (DART01/05 GICOR): a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial

The optimum duration of androgen deprivation combined with high-dose radiotherapy in prostate cancer remains undefined. We aimed to determine whether long-term androgen deprivation was superior to short-term androgen deprivation when combined with high-dose radiotherapy. In this open-label, multicentre, phase 3 randomised controlled trial, patients were recruited from ten university hospitals throughout Spain. Eligible patients had clinical stage T1c-T3b N0M0 prostate adenocarcinoma with intermediate-risk and high-risk factors according to 2005 National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) using a computer-generated randomisation schedule to receive either 4 months of androgen deprivation combined with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy at a minimum dose of 76 Gy (range 76-82 Gy; short-term androgen deprivation group) or the same treatment followed by 24 months of adjuvant androgen deprivation (long-term androgen deprivation group), stratified by prostate cancer risk group (intermediate risk vs high risk) and participating centre. Patients assigned to the short-term androgen deprivation group received 4 months of neoadjuvant and concomitant androgen deprivation with subcutaneous goserelin (2 months before and 2 months combined with high-dose radiotherapy). Anti-androgen therapy (flutamide 750 mg per day or bicalutamide 50 mg per day) was added during the first 2 months of treatment. Patients assigned to long-term suppression continued with the same luteinising hormone-releasing hormone analogue every 3 months for another 24 months. The primary endpoint was biochemical disease-free survival. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02175212. Between Nov 7, 2005, and Dec 20, 2010, 178 patients were randomly assigned to receive short-term androgen deprivation and 177 to receive long-term androgen deprivation. After a median follow-up of 63 months (IQR 50-82), 5-year biochemical disease-free survival was significantly better among patients receiving long-term androgen deprivation than among those receiving short-term treatment (90% [95% CI 87-92] vs 81% [78-85]; hazard ratio [HR] 1·88 [95% CI 1·12-3·15]; p=0·01). 5-year overall survival (95% [95% CI 93-97] vs 86% [83-89]; HR 2·48 [95% CI 1·31-4·68]; p=0·009) and 5-year metastasis-free survival (94% [95% CI 92-96] vs 83% [80-86]; HR 2·31 [95% CI 1·23-3·85]; p=0·01) were also significantly better in the long-term androgen deprivation group than in the short-term androgen deprivation group. The effect of long-term androgen deprivation on biochemical disease-free survival, metastasis-free survival, and overall survival was more evident in patients with high-risk disease than in those with low-risk disease. Grade 3 late rectal toxicity was noted in three (2%) of 177 patients in the long-term androgen deprivation group and two (1%) of 178 in the short-term androgen deprivation group; grade 3-4 late urinary toxicity was noted in five (3%) patients in each group. No deaths related to treatment were reported. Compared with short-term androgen deprivation, 2 years of adjuvant androgen deprivation combined with high-dose radiotherapy improved biochemical control and overall survival in patients with prostate cancer, particularly those with high-risk disease, with no increase in late radiation toxicity. Longer follow-up is needed to determine whether men with intermediate-risk disease benefit from more than 4 months of androgen deprivation. Spanish National Health Investigation Fund, AstraZeneca.