4DCT technology is used in radiation oncology to estimate the internal motion of organs due to breathing. While used to determine the internal target volume (ITV), there is a lack of publications that show the precision and accuracy of 4DCT technology with low density targets. In this study, we investigate the accuracy of the Minimum Intensity Projection (mIP) when the target is air and the surrounding medium is acrylic. A Quasar phantom with a 4D PET-CT insert (P/N: 500-3318) filled with air was utilized for the study. The scanning unit was a GE Optima Scanner utilizing Real-Time Positioning ManagementTM (RPM) System. The breathing period is a sinusoidal breathing pattern set to 20 cycles per minute with 4 cm amplitude. A set of two different studies was performed: static, where the phantom was scanned without motion, and dynamic-tracking, where the moving phantom was tracked using RPM. For the dynamic-tracking study, 3D images were created for each of the 10 breathing phases utilizing phase sorting. From these, a 3D mIP image and an average 3D image (AVG) were created. The air cavity was contoured in both studies using Lung window level preset and the diameter, height and volume were determined. The true ITV was calculated using vendor insert specifications. The amplitude of motion was obtained by subtracting the static height from the mIP and the AVG and compared with the amplitude set on the phantom. Next, a CBCT was performed on the phantom using a linear accelerator. The volume of air was contoured on this scan using the same preset as before, and this volume was compared to the volume on the AVG reconstructed 3D image. The mIP had a measured amplitude of 3.97 cm compared with the true set amplitude of 4cm and a target volume of 41.2 cm3 compared with the true ITV volume of 42.74 cm3 resulting in a difference from the true values of -0.8% and -3.6%, respectively. The AVG measured amplitude was 3.90 cm and target volume were 37.2 cm3, resulting in a difference of 2.5% and -13.0%, respectively. The CBCT had a measured amplitude of motion of 3.88 cm, which resulted in a difference from the true amplitude of -3.0%, but when compared against the AVG only resulted in a difference of -0.5%, with the AVG being slightly larger. In addition, the target volume of the CBCT was 36.4 cm3, which was slightly smaller than the AVG target volume of 37.2 cm3, with a difference of -2.2%. This study shows that the motion of a low-density target surrounded by high density material can be accurately estimated using 4DCT technology. The mIP, which is used to determine the ITV margins for treatment for low density targets, accurately depicted the motion of the target to within a millimeter. In addition, the AVG, which is the scan used for treatment planning, accurately matched the CBCT observed target. Further study is required on non-sinusoidal motion to determine 4DCT accuracy.
Read full abstract