30-day Surgical Site Infection Rate Research Articles

Initiating versus delaying treatment-dose anticoagulation in suspected venous thromboembolism (VTE) in post-operative hip and knee arthroplasty patients: Outcomes and risks

BackgroundHip and knee arthroplasty is a risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Initiation of treatment-dose anticoagulation in the post-operative period in suspected cases prior to confirmed diagnosis involves balancing increased bleeding risk to VTE-associated morbidity. MethodsA single-centre retrospective cohort study was undertaken comparing outcomes of empirical treatment of suspected VTE in post-operative elective lower-limb arthroplasty patients as opposed to delaying treatment until diagnosis is confirmed. All patients undergoing ultrasonography (US) or CT-pulmonary-angiogram (CTPA) for suspected VTE following elective total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) between 05/05/17 and 19/07/21 were identified. Primary outcomes were surgical site infection (SSI), readmission, and other wound problems within 30-days of surgery. Results107 patients were included for analysis. 93 patients had suspected deep venous thrombosis (DVT), 21 had suspected pulmonary embolism (PE), and 7 were investigated for both DVT and PE. Empirical treatment-dose anticoagulation was initiated in 4 patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) prior to CTPA, and 34 patients with suspected deep venous thrombosis (DVT) prior to US. No significant differences were noted in 30-day readmission rate ([DVT: 12 % vs 23 %, p = 0.41], [PE: 50 % vs 33 %, p = 1.00]), SSI rate ([DVT: 6 % vs 3 %, p = 1.00], [PE: 0 % vs 11 %, p = 1.00]) or other wound complication rate ([DVT: 3 % vs 3 %, p = 1.00), [PE 0 % vs 11 %, p = 1.00]) between empirically and non-empirically treated groups respectively. ConclusionEmpirical initiation of therapeutic anticoagulation in post-operative lower limb arthroplasty patients with suspected VTE appears to be safe practice prior to a definitive diagnosis.

Comparison of Early Complication Rates After High Tibial Osteotomy Versus Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty for Knee Osteoarthritis.

Although both high tibial osteotomy (HTO) and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) can be utilized to treat unicompartmental osteoarthritis (OA) in select patients, the early complication rates between the 2 procedures are not well understood. Understanding of the complication profiles for both procedures would help clinicians counsel patients with unicompartmental knee OA who may be eligible for either treatment option. To compare the 30-day complication rates after HTO versus UKA for the treatment of knee OA using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. NSQIP registries between 2006 and 2019 were queried using Current Procedural Terminology codes to identify patients undergoing HTO and UKA for knee OA. Patients >60 years of age were excluded. Patient demographics, preoperative comorbidities, and intraoperative data were collected. Postoperative 30-day complications, including venous thromboembolism (VTE), urinary tract infection (UTI), transfusion, surgical-site infection (SSI), and reoperations were recorded. Complication rates between treatment groups were compared using a multivariate logistic regression model adjusted for sex, age, body mass index, steroid use, respiratory status (smoking/dyspnea/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), diabetes, and hypertension. A total of 156 patients treated with HTO and 4755 patients treated with UKA for knee OA were identified. Mean patient ages were 46 years for the HTO group and 53.4 years for the UKA group. Operative time was significantly longer in the HTO group versus the UKA group (112 minutes vs 90 minutes; P < .001). Multivariate analyses found no significant differences in VTE (1.3% vs 0.6%), UTI (0.6% vs 0.3%), transfusion (0.6% vs 0.2%), deep SSI (0.6% vs 0.1%), and reoperation (1.3% vs 1%) rates between HTO and UKA groups. The HTO group had a higher rate of superficial SSI compared with the UKA group (2.6% vs 0.6%; P = .006) (adjusted odds ratio, 4.2; 95% CI, 1.4-12.5; P = .01). There were no differences in 30-day VTE, UTI, transfusion, deep SSI, and reoperation rates for HTO versus UKA in the treatment of knee OA. HTO was associated with a higher rate of superficial SSI compared with UKA. These findings serve to guide clinicians in counseling patients regarding the early risks after HTO and UKA.

The iterative implementation of a comprehensive enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in all spinal surgery in Korea: a comparative analysis of clinical outcomes and medical costs between primary spinal tumors and degenerative spinal diseases.

Most studies on the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in spine surgery have focused on patients with degenerative spinal diseases (DSDs), resulting in a lack of evidence for a comprehensive ERAS protocol applicable to patients with primary spine tumors (PSTs) and other spinal diseases. The authors had developed and gradually adopted components of the comprehensive ERAS protocol for all spine surgical procedures from 2003 to 2011, and then the current ERAS protocol was fully implemented in 2012. This study aimed to evaluate the impact and the applicability of the comprehensive ERAS protocol across all spine surgical procedures and to compare outcomes between the PST and DSD groups. Adult spine surgical procedures were conducted from 2003 to 2021 at the Seoul National University Hospital Spine Center and data were retrospectively reviewed. The author divided the study periods into the developing ERAS (2003-2011) and post-current ERAS (2012-2021) periods, and outcomes were compared between the two periods. Surgical procedures for metastatic cancer, infection, and trauma were excluded. Interrupted time series analysis (ITSA) was used to assess the impact of the ERAS protocol on medical costs and clinical outcomes, including length of stay (LOS) and rates of 30-day readmission, reoperation, and surgical site infection (SSI). Subgroup analyses were conducted on the PST and DSD groups in terms of LOS and medical costs. The study included 7143 surgical procedures, comprising 1494 for PSTs, 5340 for DSDs, and 309 for other spinal diseases. After ERAS protocol implementation, spine surgical procedures showed significant reductions in LOS and medical costs by 22% (p = 0.008) and 22% (p < 0.001), respectively. The DSD group demonstrated a 16% (p < 0.001) reduction in LOS, whereas the PST group achieved a 28% (p < 0.001) reduction, noting a more pronounced LOS reduction in PST surgical procedures (p = 0.003). Medical costs decreased by 23% (p < 0.001) in the DSD group and 12% (p = 0.054) in the PST group, with a larger cost reduction for DSD surgical procedures (p = 0.021). No statistically significant differences were found in the rates of 30-day readmission, reoperation, and SSI between the developing and post-current ERAS implementation periods (p = 0.65, p = 0.59, and p = 0.52, respectively). Comprehensive ERAS protocol implementation significantly reduced LOS and medical costs in all spine surgical procedures, while maintaining comparable 30-day readmission, reoperation, and SSI rates. These findings suggest that the ERAS protocol is equally applicable to all spine surgical procedures, with a more pronounced effect on reducing LOS in the PST group and on reducing medical costs in the DSD group.

SP3.8 Evaluation of remote surgical wound assessment in routine surgical practice: a mixed-methods pilot implementational study of a novel mobile digital intervention

Abstract Introduction Remote postoperative wound surveillance provides an opportunity to strengthen postoperative community care and minimise the burden of surgical-site infection (SSI). This study aimed to pilot remote digital postoperative wound surveillance and evaluate the readiness for implementation in routine practice. Methods A single-arm implementation study of remote postoperative wound surveillance in two tertiary care hospitals (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05069103). Adults undergoing abdominal surgery received smartphone-delivered wound assessment for 30-days postoperatively (photographs and patient-reported SSI symptoms). Technology acceptance was assessed using 5-point Likert scales from the validated Telehealth Usability Questionnaire (TUQ) and summarised using means and 95% confidence intervals (CI). A mixed-methods approach was used with synthesis according to the WHO framework for monitoring and evaluating digital health interventions. Results 200 patients participated between July 2021 and April 2022, with 115 (57.5%) undergoing emergency procedures. The 30-day SSI rate was 16.5% (n=33/200), with 72.7% (n=24) diagnosed post-discharge. Usage of the intervention was 83.0% (n=166/200), with subsequently 74.1% (n=123/166) TUQ completion. Patient acceptance was high with regards to satisfaction (4.27, CI: 4.13-4.41) and usefulness (4.07, CI: 3.92-4.23). Communication was rated lowest (3.86, CI: 3.71-4.02), related to the desire for more frequent and personalised interactions with the surgical team. Nevertheless, the majority perceived improved quality (3.72, CI: 3.56-3.89) and efficiency (4.08, CI: 3.93-4.23) over routine postoperative care. Conclusion Remote postoperative wound surveillance successfully demonstrates readiness for implementation according to the WHO framework. Both patients and healthcare services can benefit from enhanced community support to ensure appropriate and timely management.

O171 Evaluation of remote surgical wound assessment in routine surgical practice: a mixed-methods pilot implementational study of a novel mobile digital intervention

Abstract Introduction Remote postoperative wound surveillance provides an opportunity to strengthen postoperative community care and minimise the burden of surgical-site infection (SSI). This study aimed to pilot remote digital postoperative wound surveillance and evaluate the readiness for implementation in routine practice. Methods A single-arm implementational study of remote postoperative wound surveillance in two tertiary care hospitals (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05069103). Adults undergoing abdominal surgery received smartphone-delivered wound assessment for 30-days postoperatively (photographs and patient-reported SSI symptoms). Technology acceptance was assessed using 5-point Likert scales from the validated Telehealth Usability Questionnaire (TUQ), and summarised using means and 95% confidence intervals (CI). A mixed-methods approach was used with synthesis according to the WHO framework for monitoring and evaluating digital health interventions. Results 200 patients participated between July 2021 and April 2022, with 115 (57.5%) undergoing emergency procedures. The 30-day SSI rate was 16.5% (n=33/200), with 72.7% (n=24) diagnosed post-discharge. Usage of the intervention was 83.0% (n=166/200), with subsequently 74.1% (n=123/166) TUQ completion. Patient acceptance was high with regards to satisfaction (4.27, CI: 4.13-4.41) and usefulness (4.07, CI: 3.92-4.23). Communication was rated lowest (3.86, CI: 3.71-4.02), related to the desire for more frequent and personalised interactions with the surgical team. Nevertheless, the majority perceived improved quality (3.72, CI: 3.56-3.89) and efficiency (4.08, CI: 3.93-4.23) over routine postoperative care. Conclusion Remote postoperative wound surveillance successfully demonstrates readiness for implementation according to the WHO framework. Both patients and healthcare services can benefit from enhanced community support to ensure appropriate and timely management.

Evaluation of remote digital postoperative wound monitoring in routine surgical practice

Remote digital postoperative wound monitoring provides an opportunity to strengthen postoperative community care and minimise the burden of surgical-site infection (SSI). This study aimed to pilot a remote digital postoperative wound monitoring service and evaluate the readiness for implementation in routine clinical practice. This was a single-arm pilot implementational study of remote digital postoperative wound monitoring across two tertiary care hospitals in the UK (IDEAL stage 2b, clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05069103). Adults undergoing abdominal surgery were recruited and received a smartphone-delivered wound assessment tool for 30-days postoperatively. Patients received 30-day postoperative follow-up, including the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire (TUQ). A thematic mixed-methods approach was used, according to the WHO framework for monitoring and evaluating digital health interventions. 200 patients were enroled, of whom 115 (57.5%) underwent emergency surgical procedures. Overall, the 30-day SSI rate was 16.5% (n = 33/200), with 72.7% (n = 24) diagnosed post-discharge. Usage of the intervention was 83.0% (n = 166/200), with subsequently 74.1% (n = 123/166) TUQ completion. There were no issues reported with feasibility of the technology, with the reliability (3.87, 95% CI: 3.73–4.00) and quality of the interface rated highly (4.18, 95%: 4.06–4.30). Patient acceptance was similarly high with regards to ease of use (4.51, 95% CI: 4.41–4.62), satisfaction (4.27, 95% CI: 4.13–4.41), and usefulness (4.07, 95% CI: 3.92–4.23). Despite the desire for more frequent and personalised interactions, the majority viewed the intervention as providing meaningful benefit over routine postoperative care. Remote digital postoperative wound monitoring successfully demonstrated readiness for implementation with regards to the technology, usability, and healthcare process improvement.

Can Currently Suggested Quality Indicators Be Transferred to Meningioma Surgery?-A Single-Center Pilot Study.

Risk stratification based on standardized quality measures has become crucial in neurosurgery. Contemporary quality indicators have often been developed for a wide range of neurosurgical procedures collectively. The accuracy of tumor-inherent characteristics of patients diagnosed with meningioma remains questionable. The objective of this study was the analysis of currently applied quality indicators in meningioma surgery and the identification of potential new measures. Data of 133 patients who were operated on due to intracranial meningiomas were subjected to a retrospective analysis. The primary outcomes of interest were classical quality indicators such as the 30-day readmission, 30-day reoperation, 30-day mortality, 30-day nosocomial infection, and the 30-day surgical site infection rate. Uni- and multivariate analyses were performed. The occurrence of a new postoperative neurologic deficit was analyzed as a potential new quality indicator. The overall unplanned readmission rate was 3.8%; 13 patients were reoperated within 30 days (9.8%). The 30-day nosocomial infection and surgical site infection rates were 6.8 and 1.5%, respectively. A postoperative new neurologic deficit or neurologic deterioration as a currently assessed quality feature was observed in 12 patients (9.2%). The edema volume on preoperative scans proved to have a significant impact on the occurrence of a new postoperative neurologic deficit (p = 0.023). Classical quality indicators in neurosurgery have proved to correlate with considerable deterioration of the patient's health in meningioma surgery and thus should be taken into consideration for application in meningioma patients. The occurrence of a new postoperative neurologic deficit is common and procedure specific. Thus, this should be elucidated for application as a complementary quality indicator in meningioma surgery.

PreciSSIon: a collaborative initiative to reduce surgical site infections after elective colorectal surgery

Surgical site infections (SSIs) are common after colorectal surgery, but most hospitals do not know their SSI rates. Approximately half of SSIs occur after discharge, and postdischarge surveillance is needed for accurate measurement. Perioperative care bundles are known to reduce SSI rates. PreciSSion is a collaboration between seven hospitals in the West of England. To establish reliable SSI measurement after elective colorectal surgery using 30-day patient-reported outcome measures, and to implement an evidence-based four-point care bundle that had already demonstrated a reduction in the SSI rate in a local hospital. The bundle included: 2% chlorhexidine skin preparation, a second dose of antibiotic after 4h, use of a dual-ring wound protector, and use of antibacterial sutures for abdominal wall closure. The 30-day patient-reported SSI rate was determined using the Public Health England questionnaire, and response rates were recorded. The baseline SSI rate was measured from November 2019 to May 2020, and continued after implementation of the care bundle until March 2021. Bundle compliance was also measured. The average questionnaire response rate was 81%, and average compliance was 92%, 96%, 79% and 85% for each element of the bundle. The baseline SSI rate was 8-30%. Six of seven hospitals reduced their SSI rate, and the regional average SSI rate almost halved from 18% (1447 patients) to 9.5% (1247 patients). A care bundle developed in a single hospital can be adopted in other hospitals, and a 50% reduction in SSI rate after elective colorectal surgery can be replicated in other hospitals within 18 months.

Surgical Site Infection (SSI) Surveillance Program for Mastectomy in the Department of Surgery of the University of the Philippines-Philippine General Hospital

Background. Mastectomy is a common surgical procedure done worldwide. Surgical site infection (SSI) is a common healthcare-associated infection. Mastectomy SSIs are frequently under-reported.&#x0D; Objectives. The study aimed to determine the incidence of SSI among mastectomy cases of the Department of Surgery, University of the Philippines – Philippine General Hospital (UP-PGH) during one year of full implementation of the Surgical Site Infection Surveillance Program and evaluate the program’s surveillance follow-up rate.&#x0D; Methods. This study was an observational practice audit research that included all adult patients who underwent a mastectomy in UP-PGH from January 1, 2018, to January 31, 2019, when the SSI Surveillance Program was fully implemented. SSI was monitored and assessed during the patient’s hospital stay, on the day of hospital discharge, and at 30 days (± 2 days) after surgery, either during an outpatient visit or via phone call by a nurse navigator. SSI frequency for mastectomy was computed both during the in-hospital stay and at 30 days after surgery. Surveillance follow-up rate, defined as the proportion of patients who could follow-up up to 30 days after surgery, was determined.&#x0D; Results. The 30-day SSI rate for mastectomy was 6.8% (19/279). All 279 patients were followed up to 30 days after surgery. Of the 279 patients, 277 (99.3%) were through clinic visits, one was through phone calls, and one was still admitted to the hospital.&#x0D; Conclusion. Full implementation of the SSI Surveillance Program for mastectomy in UP-PGH for one year showed a higher SSI rate than in published international literature. The program had a complete 30-day patient follow-up, contributing to more accurate SSI reporting. Implementing an SSI surveillance program with standardized protocols, dedicated personnel, patient education component, and the analysis of the information derived from such programs can improve an institution's quality of surgical care.

Remote diagnosis of surgical-site infection using a mobile digital intervention: a randomised controlled trial in emergency surgery patients

Surgical site infections (SSI) cause substantial morbidity and pose a burden to acute healthcare services after surgery. We aimed to investigate whether a smartphone-delivered wound assessment tool can expedite diagnosis and treatment of SSI after emergency abdominal surgery. This single-blinded randomised control trial (NCT02704897) enroled adult emergency abdominal surgery patients in two tertiary care hospitals. Patients were randomised (1:1) to routine postoperative care or additional access to a smartphone-delivered wound assessment tool for 30-days postoperatively. Patient-reported SSI symptoms and wound photographs were requested on postoperative days 3, 7, and 15. The primary outcome was time-to-diagnosis of SSI (Centers for Disease Control definition). 492 patients were randomised (smartphone intervention: 223; routine care: 269). There was no significant difference in the 30-day SSI rate between trial arms: 21 (9.4%) in smartphone vs 20 (7.4%, p = 0.513) in routine care. Among the smartphone group, 32.3% (n = 72) did not utilise the tool. There was no significant difference in time-to-diagnosis of SSI for patients receiving the intervention (−2.5 days, 95% CI: −6.6−1.6, p = 0.225). However, patients in the smartphone group had 3.7-times higher odds of diagnosis within 7 postoperative days (95% CI: 1.02−13.51, p = 0.043). The smartphone group had significantly reduced community care attendance (OR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.34−0.94, p = 0.030), similar hospital attendance (OR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.28−1.96, p = 0.577), and significantly better experiences in accessing care (OR: 2.02, 95% CI: 1.17−3.53, p = 0.013). Smartphone-delivered wound follow-up is feasible following emergency abdominal surgery. This can facilitate triage to the appropriate level of assessment required, allowing earlier postoperative diagnosis of SSI.

WALANT Hand and Upper Extremity Procedures Performed With Minor Field Sterility Are Associated With Low Infection Rates.

The use of minor field sterility in hand/upper extremity cases has been shown to improve workflow efficiency while maintaining patient safety. As this finding has been limited to specific procedures, we investigated the safety of performing a wide array of hand/upper extremity procedures outside the main operating room using minimal field sterility with Wide-Awake Local Anaesthesia No Tourniquet (WALANT) anaesthesia by evaluating superficial and deep infection rates across a diverse series of cases. This study was a case series conducted between October 2017 and June 2020. Of all, 217 patients underwent hand/upper extremity procedures performed in a minor procedure room via WALANT technique with field sterility. Primary outcome measures include superficial and deep surgical site infections within 14 days post-surgery. Of all, 217 patients were included in this study; 265 consecutive hand/upper extremity operations were performed by a single surgeon, with notable case diversity. The majority of patients (n = 215, 99.1%) did not report or present with signs of infection before or after their operation. We report 0% 14-day and 0.37% 30-day surgical site infection rates for such hand/upper extremity procedures performed in a minor procedure room with field sterility. Hand/upper extremity procedures performed via WALANT technique with field sterility in a minor procedure room are associated with low surgical site infection rates. These rates are comparable to surgical site infection rates for similar surgeries performed in main operating rooms with standard sterilization procedures. Thus, the implementation of this technique may allow for improved workflow efficiency and reduced waste, all while maintaining patient safety.

Initial Outcomes of a Novel Irrigating Wound Protector for Reducing the Risk of Surgical Site Infection in Elective Colectomies

Surgical site infection (SSI) rates in elective colorectal surgery remain high due to intraoperative exposure of colonic bacteria at the surgical site. We aimed to evaluate 30-day SSI outcomes of a novel wound retractor that combines barrier protection with continuous wound irrigation in elective colorectal resection. A retrospective single-center cohort-matched analysis included all patients undergoing elective colorectal resection utilizing the novel irrigating wound protector (IWP) from April 2015 to July 2019. A control cohort of patients who underwent the same procedures with a standard wound protector over the same time period were also identified. Patients from both groups were matched for procedure type, procedure approach, pathology requiring operation, age, sex, race, body mass index, diabetes, smoker status, hypertension, presence of disseminated cancer, current steroid or immunosuppressant use, wound classification, and American Society of Anesthesiologist classification. SSI frequency, SSI subtype (superficial, deep, or organ space), hospital length of stay (LOS) and associated procedure were tabulated through 30 postoperative days. Fisher's exact test and number needed to treat (NNT) were used to compare SSI rates and estimate cost between both groups. The IWP group had 41 patients. The control group had 82 patients. Control-matched variables were similar for both groups. 30-day SSI rates were significantly lower in the IWP group (P=0.0298). length of stay was significantly shorter in the IWP group (P=0.0150). The NNT for the IWP to prevent one episode of SSI was 8.2 patients. The novel IWP device shows promise to reducing the risk of SSI in elective colorectal surgery.

Is sterile exposure in perianal procedures necessary? A single-institution experience and results from a national survey.

Surgical site infections (SSI) are the most common postoperative complications. To minimize the risk of SSI, there is a strict asepsis policy in the operating theatre. The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk and cost-saving benefit of performing perianal surgery in a non-sterile setting. All patients who had perianal surgery at our institution between January 2014 and December 2017 in a sterile (S) or non-sterile (NS) setting for an infectious or non-infectious cause were included. The primary outcome was the 30-day SSI rate. The secondary outcome was the reintervention rate. A questionnaire was sent to surgeons in the Netherlands to assess current policy with regard to asepsis in perianal procedures. Finally, a cost analysis was performed. In total, 376 patients were included. The rate of SSI in infectious procedures was 13% (S) versus 14% (NS, p = 0.853) and 5.1% (S) versus 0.9% (NS) in non-infectious procedures (p = 0.071). Reintervention rates in infectious procedures were 3.4% (S) versus 8.6% (NS, p = 0.187) and 1.3% (S) versus 0.0% (NS) in non-infectious procedures (p = 0.227). The questionnaire revealed that most surgeons perform perianal surgery in a sterile setting although they did not consider this useful. The potential national cost-saving benefit of a non-sterile setting is €124.61 per patient. This study suggests that it is safe to perform perianal surgery in a non-sterile setting with regard to the SSI and reintervention rate. Adjustment of the current practice will contribute to a reduction in healthcare expenses.

Diagnosis of colorectal and emergency surgical site infections in the era of enhanced recovery: an all-Wales prospective study.

Surgical site infections (SSIs) are associated with increased morbidity, hospital stay and cost. The literature reports that 25% of patients who undergo colorectal surgical procedures develop a SSI. Due to the enhanced recovery programme, patients are being discharged earlier with some SSIs presenting in primary care, making accurate recording of SSIs difficult. The aim of this study was to accurately record the 30-day SSI rate after surgery performed by colorectal surgeons nationally within Wales. During March 2019, a national prospective snapshot study of all patients undergoing elective or emergency colorectal and general surgical procedures under the care of a colorectal consultant at 12 Welsh hospitals was completed. There was a multimodal 30-day follow-up using electronic records, clinic visits and/or telephone calls. Diagnosis of SSI was based on Centers for Disease Control and Prevention diagnostic criteria. Within Wales, of the 545 patients included, 13% developed a SSI within 30days, with SSI rates of 14.3% for elective surgery and 11.7% for emergency surgery. Of these SSIs, 49.3% were diagnosed in primary care, with 28.2% of patients being managed exclusively in the community. There were two peaks of diagnosis at days 5-7 and days 22-28. SSI rates between laparoscopic (8.6%) and open (16.2%) surgeries were significantly different (p=0.028), and there was also a significantly different rate of SSI between procedure groups (p=0.001), with high SSI rates for colon (22%) and rectal (18.9%) surgery compared with general surgical procedures. This first all-Wales prospective study demonstrated an overall SSI rate of 13%. By incorporating accurate primary care follow-up it was found that 49.3% of these SSIs were diagnosed in primary care.

Comparing the outcomes of external oblique and transversus abdominus release using the AHSQC database.

Myofascial release techniques at the time of complex hernia repair allow for tension-free closure of the midline fascia. Two common techniques are the open external oblique release (EOR) and the transversus abdominis release (TAR). Each technique has its reported advantages and disadvantages, but there have been few comparative studies. The purpose of this project was to compare the outcomes of these two myofascial release techniques. The Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative (AHSQC) database was queried and produced a data set on 24 May 2018. All patients undergoing open incision hernia repair with an open EOR or TAR were evaluated, and outcomes were compared including hernia recurrence, quality of life, and 30-day wound-related complications. 3610 patients met the inclusion criteria of undergoing open incisional hernia repair (501 undergoing EOR and 3109 undergoing TAR). Seventy surgeons from 50 institutions contributed EOR patients, and 124 surgeons from 89 institutions contributed TAR patients with no differences between the two groups in surgeons' affiliation. Comparing open EOR and TAR showed no significant differences in hernia recurrence, quality of life, or 30-day surgical site infection rate. EOR had a significantly higher rate of surgical site occurrences compared with TAR (p < 0.05); however, this did not result in an increase in surgical site occurrences requiring procedural interventions. Equivalent outcomes were achieved using the EOR or TAR techniques in the open repair of incisional hernias. Both techniques offer consistently good outcomes and are important adjuncts in the repair of complex incisional hernias.

69. Impact of antimicrobial stewardship interventions on post-elective caesarean antibiotic prophylaxis and surgical site infections

BackgroundAntimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP) aim to improve appropriate antimicrobial use. This study aims to evaluate the impact of ASP interventions on post-elective caesarean (eLSCS) oral antibiotic prophylaxis use. In a subgroup of those without surgical site infection (SSI) risk factors, 30-day SSI rates was compared in those who received post-eLSCS oral antibiotics vs. those without.MethodsThis pre-post quasi-experimental study was conducted over 9 months (2 months pre- and 7 months post-intervention) in all women admitted for eLSCS in our institution. Interventions included eLSCS surgical prophylaxis guideline dissemination, where a single antibiotic dose within 60 minutes before skin incision was recommended. Post-eLSCS oral antibiotics was discouraged in those without SSI risk factors (e.g. obesity). This was followed by ASP intervention notes (phase 1) for 3 months, and an additional phone call to the ward team for the next 4 months (phase 2).ResultsA total of 894 women were reviewed. There were 244 women in the pre-intervention phase, 274 in post-intervention phase 1 and 376 in phase 2. Pre-intervention post-eLSCS antibiotic prescribing rates was 82% (200), compared to 54% (148) in phase 1 and 49% (180) in phase 2 (p< 0.001). There were 560 women without SSI risk factors. Of these, only 4 of 301 (1.3%) who received oral antibiotics, and 3 of 259 (1.2%) without oral antibiotics developed post-op SSI (p=1.000).ConclusionASP can reduce post-eLSCS antibiotic prophylaxis. In those without SSI risk factors, use of post-eLSCS oral antibiotics did not impact SSI rates.Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Colorectal bundles for surgical site infection prevention: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

In colorectal surgery, the composition of the most effective bundle for prevention of surgical site infections (SSI) remains uncertain. We performed a meta-analysis to identify bundle interventions most associated with SSI reduction. We systematically reviewed 4 databases for studies that assessed bundles with ≥3 elements recommended by clinical practice guidelines for adult colorectal surgery. The main outcome was 30-day postoperative SSI rate (overall, superficial, deep, and/or organ-space). We included 40 studies in the qualitative review, and 35 studies (54,221 patients) in the quantitative review. Only 3 studies were randomized controlled trials. On meta-analyses, bundles were associated with overall SSI reductions of 44% (RR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.48-0.65); superficial SSI reductions of 44% (RR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.42-0.75); deep SSI reductions of 33% (RR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.46-0.98); and organ-space SSI reductions of 37% (RR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.50-0.81). Bundle composition was heterogeneous. In our meta-regression analysis, bundles containing ≥11 elements, consisting of both standard of care and new interventions, demonstrated the greatest SSI reduction. Separate instrument trays, gloves with and without gown change for wound closure, and standardized postoperative dressing change at 48 hours correlated with the highest reductions in superficial SSIs. Mechanical bowel preparation combined with oral antibiotics, and preoperative chlorhexidine showers correlated with highest organ-space SSI reductions. Preventive bundles emphasizing guideline-recommended elements from both standard of care as well as new interventions were most effective for SSI reduction following colorectal surgery. High clinical-bundle heterogeneity and low quality for most observational studies significantly limit our conclusion.

Introduction of a care bundle effectively and sustainably reduces patient-reported surgical site infection in patients undergoing colorectal surgery

Surgical site infection (SSI) is one of the most common healthcare-associated infections and is particularly prevalent following colorectal surgery. It is associated with an increase in patient morbidity and healthcare costs. SSI is difficult to monitor as it frequently presents after discharge from hospital, especially if enhanced recovery programmes are in place. To develop an effective method for measuring patient-reported 30-day SSI in patients undergoing colorectal resection. To implement a new care bundle capable of delivering a sustainable reduction in SSI. The Public Health England SSI surveillance questionnaire was used. Several data collection methods were tested including postal and telephone-based systems. A new SSI bundle was introduced in our centre incorporating four evidence-based interventions: 2% chlorhexidine skin preparation; repeat-dose antibiotics after 4 h; dual-ring wound protectors; and triclosan-coated sutures for wound closure. System changes were introduced to ensure that the change was sustainable. The most reliable method of measuring patient-reported SSI was found to be postal questionnaire with telephone calls made to non-responders. Response rates to the SSI surveillance questionnaire were consistently >75%. Introduction of the new care bundle produced a significant reduction in SSI from 20% to 10% (P ≤ 0.0001) which has been sustained for six years. This is a reliable method for measuring 30-day patient-reported SSI rates. The introduction of this new care bundle has halved the rate of SSI from 20% to 10%.

Implementation of a comprehensive unit-based safety program to reduce surgical site infections in cesarean delivery

To evaluate whether using a comprehensive and multidisciplinary approach to implement an evidence-based bundle can reduce 30-day surgical site infection rates in women undergoing cesarean delivery. This observational study with a preintervention and postintervention design included 2576 consecutive women undergoing cesarean delivery at our tertiary care hospital between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2017. The primary outcome was 30-day surgical site infection rate after cesarean delivery defined according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria. The preintervention period span from the January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2014. After initiation of a Comprehensive Unit-based Safety Program (ie, a continuous quality improvement program to improve patient safety using a comprehensive and multidisciplinary approach adapted on local demands), we introduced a bundle of evidence-based interventions (including preoperative shower, hair removal with clippers, correct antibiotic prophylaxis, maintaining normothermia, glycemic control, and strict compliance with hygiene standards as well as practice good hand hygiene) per January 1, 2015 into clinical routine. The postintervention period span from January 1, 2015 to December 31 2017. In the preintervention period the overall surgical site infection rate was 16 of 1,060 cesarean deliveries versus in the postintervention period the overall surgical site infection rate was 9 of 1,516 cesarean deliveries (1.50% vs 0.56%; P = .033). This corresponds to a relative risk reduction of over 60% after implementation of the evidence-based bundle (odds ratio 0.39, 95% confidence interval 0.17-0.89; P = .020). In the present study, we have adapted the Comprehensive Unit-based Safety Program strategy to implement an evidence based-bundle into clinical routine. Using this comprehensive and multidisciplinary approach, we could markedly reduce 30-day surgical site infections.

Comparing outcomes of the endoscopic and open external oblique myofascial release

AIMS: The external oblique release (EOR) is a well-described technique for myofascial advancement during hernia repair. One of the reported drawbacks of an open approach is the high wound morbidity associated with this procedure. One proposed technique to reduce wound morbidity is the endoscopic EOR. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of the open and endoscopic EOR. METHODS: Data from the Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative were queried on May 10, 2017. All patients undergoing open or endoscopic incisional hernia repair with an EOR were evaluated with comparative outcomes including hernia recurrence, quality of life, and 30-day wound complications. RESULTS: Four hundred and eighty-five patients met inclusion criteria of undergoing open or endoscopic EOR. Surgical site infections (SSIs) occurred in 6% of the patients undergoing open EOR and 14% undergoing endoscopic EOR. There were no differences in outcomes comparing open and endoscopic EOR for hernia recurrence, quality of life, or 30-day SSI rate (P > 0.05). Laparoscopic EOR had a significantly higher rate of surgical site occurrences (SSOs) compared with open EOR (P 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Equivalent outcomes were achieved using the open or endoscopic EOR technique in open repair of incisional hernia. Both techniques offer good outcomes and are important adjuncts in the repair of complex incisional hernias.