3-weekly Docetaxel Research Articles

A randomized phase III study comparing 2-weekly docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-FU (bDCF) with cisplatin and 5-FU (CF) in patients with metastatic or recurrent esophageal cancer: JCOG1314 (MIRACLE).

322 Background: For metastatic or recurrent esophageal cancer, 2-drug combination of cisplatin and 5-FU (CF) has long been a standard of care before the emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Previous phase I/II study of 3-drug combination, 2-weekly docetaxel plus CF (bDCF) showed promising antitumor activity (JCOG0807). We conducted JCOG1314, a randomized phase III study to confirm the survival superiority of bDCF over CF. Methods: Main eligibility criteria were metastatic or recurrent esophageal cancer; histologically proven squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma; age 20 to 75; no previous systemic therapy for metastatic disease. Patients were randomly assigned to CF arm (cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1, and 5-FU 800 mg/m2 on days 1-5, every 28 days), or bDCF arm (docetaxel 30 mg/m2 on day 1 and day 15 in addition to CF, every 28 days). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). To detect a 3-month difference in median OS [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.73] with study-wise, one-sided alpha level of 5% and power of 75%, 240 patients were required. Results: A total of 240 patients were randomly assigned to bDCF (n = 121) and CF (n = 119) between September 2014 to April 2021. Patient background in bDCF/CF arm was median age, 65/64 years; ECOG performance status 0, 69%/75%; metastatic disease, 63%/67%, ≥2 metastatic organs, 59%/56%; squamous cell carcinoma, 94%/97%. As a data cut-off of April 2023, all 240 patients discontinued protocol treatment. The reasons for treatment discontinuation in bDCF/CF arm were disease progression, 58%/71%; adverse events (AEs), 35%/27%; refusal, 1%/1%; others, 7%/5%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 15.3 months (m), bDCF arm was not superior to CF arm in terms of OS with a median of 16.2 m versus 14.8 m [HR, 0.90; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.68–1.19; p = 0.23], however, progression-free survival (PFS) in bDCF arm was favorable compared to CF arm with a median of 6.0 m versus 5.2 m (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.52–0.88). Response rate in bDCF/CF arm was 52.8%/45.6%. Major grade 3 or 4 AEs observed in bDCF/CF arm were neutropenia (37.8%/27.1%); anorexia (25.2%/16.1%); fatigue (10.1%/15.3%); hyponatremia (13.4%/13.6%). No treatment related death was observed. Subsequent therapy in bDCF/CF arm was provided for 87%/89% of patients. Conclusions: JCOG1314 did not reach its primary objective, although bDCF was associated with significant increases in PFS. CF is still the standard therapy in patients with metastatic or recurrent esophageal cancer if ICIs are not applicable. Clinical trial information: jRCTs031180143 .

Nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel-based neoadjuvant regimen: A promising treatment option for HER2-low-positive breast cancer

This study aimed to compare the efficacy of neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) with solvent-based paclitaxel (Sb-P), liposomal paclitaxel (Lps-P), nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (Nab-P), and docetaxel in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low-positive and HER2-zero breast cancers. A total of 430 patients receiving 2-weekly dose-dense epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (EC) followed by 2-weekly paclitaxel (Sb-P, Lps-P, or Nab-P), or 3-weekly EC followed by 3-weekly docetaxel for NST were enrolled in the study. In HER2-low-positive patients, the pathological complete response (pCR) rate in Nab-P group was significantly higher than that in the other three paclitaxel groups (2.8 % in Sb-P group, 4.7 % in Lps-P group, 23.2 % in Nab-P group and 3.2 % in docetaxel group, p < 0.001). In HER2-zero patients, the pCR rate did not differ significantly among the four paclitaxel groups (p = 0.278). The NST regimen containing Nab-P could be considered a promising treatment option in HER2-low-positive breast cancer.

Effects of induction chemotherapy on nutrition status in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a multicentre prospective study.

Induction chemotherapy (IC) and concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is the standard of care for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC). This intensive treatment regimen increases acute toxicities, which could negatively impact patients' nutritional status. We conducted this prospective, multicentre trial to investigate the effects of IC and CCRT on nutritional status in LA-NPC patients, so as to provide evidence for further study of nutritional intervention, which was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02575547). Patients with biopsy-proven NPC and planned for IC+CCRT were recruited. IC entailed two cycles of 3-weekly docetaxel 75mg/m2 and cisplatin 75mg/m2 ; CCRT entailed two to three cycles of 3-weekly cisplatin 100mg/m2 depending on the duration of radiotherapy. Nutritional status and quality of life (QoL) were assessed pre-IC, post-cycles one and two of IC, W4 and W7 of CCRT. Primary endpoint was the cumulative proportion of ≥ 5.0% weight loss (WL5.0 ) by the end of treatment (W7-CCRT). Secondary endpoints included body mass index, NRS2002 and PG-SGA scores, QoL, hypoalbuminaemia, treatment compliance, acute and late toxicitiesand survivals. The associations between primary and secondary endpoints were also evaluated. One hundred and seventy-one patients were enrolled. Median follow-up was 67.4 (IQR: 64.1-71.2) months. 97.7% (167/171) patients completed two cycles of IC, and 87.7% (150/171) completed at least two cycles of concurrent chemotherapy; all, except one patient (0.6%), completed IMRT. WL was minimal during IC (median of 0.0%), but increased sharply at W4-CCRT (median of 4.0% [IQR: 0.0-7.0%]) and peaked at W7-CCRT (median of 8.5% [IQR: 4.1-11.7%]). 71.9% (123/171) of patients recorded a WL5.0 by W7-CCRT, which was associated with a higher malnutrition risk (NRS2002≥3 points: 87.7% [WL≥5.0%] vs 58.7% [WL<5.0%], P<0.001) and requirement of nutritional intervention (PG-SGA≥9 points: 82.0% [WL≥5.0%] vs 66.7% [WL <5.0%], P=0.038). The median %WL at W7-CCRT was higher in patients who suffered from ≥ G2 mucositis (9.0% vs 6.6%, P=0.025) and xerostomia (9.1% vs 6.3%, P=0.003). Besides, patients with cumulative WL5.0 also reported a higher detriment on QoL at W7-CCRT compared with patients without, with a difference of -8.3 points (95% CI [-15.1, -1.4], P=0.019). We observed a high prevalence of WL among LA-NPC patients who were treated with IC+CCRT, which peaked during CCRT, and had a detriment on patients' QoL. Our data support the need to monitor patient's nutritional status during the later phase of treatment with IC+CCRT and inform on nutritional intervention strategies.

2-weekly versus 3-weekly docetaxel for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: complete quality of life results from the randomised, phase-III PROSTY trial

Introduction Treatment with 2-weekly docetaxel 50 mg/m2 was shown to improve overall survival and was better tolerated than the standard 75 mg/m2 3-weekly regimen in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in the original randomised PROSTY trial. The aim of this study was to investigate, whether quality of life (QoL) effects would differ between the 2-weekly docetaxel 50 mg/m2 regimen from the standard 3-weekly 75 mg/m2 treatment. Materials and Methods QoL data were collected with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Prostate (FACT-P) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Advanced Prostate Symptom Index − 8 Item version (FAPSI-8). Pain was measured using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). A total of 743 forms from 163 patients were analysed in Arm A (2-weekly docetaxel), and 704 forms from 173 patients were analysed in Arm B (3-weekly docetaxel). The data were analysed using both the Wilcoxon signed rank test (with Holm–Bonferroni adjustment) and Mann–Whitney U models. Results No major differences were found in total QoL. Total QoL was higher at month 8 in Arm B (p = .020), but this was reversed in the following month (p = .043), and no statistically significant differences were found during other months. Compared to Arm A, participants in Arm B had longer-lasting deterioration in FAPSI-8 scores and emotional well-being subdomain at the beginning of treatment (p < .05). Various one-month differences were found in FACT-P subdomains (except for functional well-being), and these favoured participants in Arm A, except for the prostate-cancer subdomain. There were no differences in pain. Conclusion Based on our results, 2-weekly docetaxel was not inferior to 3-weekly docetaxel in terms of total health-related QoL and seemed to be superior at least in terms of the FAPSI-8 and emotional well-being subdomain in the first three to four months of treatment. More research on the topic is suggested to confirm the results.

Efficacy and safety of docetaxel and prednisolone chemotherapy in very elderly men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in real world: a single institute experience.

Prostate cancer is the most common type of malignancy in elderly men. Although elderly patients are commonly encountered in clinical practice, few studies have focused on the value of chemotherapy in elderly patients. In this study, we reviewed the use of docetaxel with prednisolone in elderly men (aged ≥80 years) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) at Ningbo First Hospital with a focus on efficacy and toxicity. A retrospective study including a series of men aged ≥80 years with mCRPC and received docetaxel plus prednisone chemotherapy between August 2011 and May 2019. All these cases were selected from the Ningbo First Hospital prostate cancer database located in Zhejiang Province, China. Sixteen patients were identified, with a mean age of 82 years (range, 80 to 87 years). All patients have received a median of four and half cycles (range, 1-10) of 3-week (60-75 mg/m2 ) docetaxel regimens and 5 mg prednisone twice per day. Seven (43.75%) patients completed more than six cycles. Ten (62.50%) patients had a good prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response of ≥50% decline. Eight (50.00%) patients had ostealgia before receiving docetaxel treatment and six of them (75.00%) experienced reduced pain after the treatment. Hematologic toxicity was observed in six (37.50%) patients with neutropenia, one of which was diagnosed with agranulocytosis and had to be admitted for the same reason. Other adverse reactions such as fever, debilitation, and alopecia were also observed. Very elderly patients (aged ≥80 years) with mCRPC are easy to be neglected and infrequently involved in clinical trials. Our study demonstrates that docetaxel chemotherapy plus prednisone is tolerable and effective among Chinese elderly patients (≥80 years) with mCRPC. Docetaxel chemotherapy may be given under careful surveillance even in frail elderly patients.

Retrospective comparisons of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel and docetaxel neoadjuvant regimens for breast cancer.

Aim: To compare the efficacy and safety of 2-weekly nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nP) and 3-weekly docetaxel regimens as neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) for breast cancer. Materials & methods: Patients (n=201) received NST comprising either dose-dense epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by 2-weekly nP (n=104) or 3-weekly courses of epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel (n=97). Results: Higher pathological complete responserates were achieved by the nP group. Subgroup analysis showed that the nP-based regimen achieved higher pathological complete response rates in patients with triple-negative tumor cells and high Ki67 levels. However, grades 3-4 peripheral sensory neuropathies were more frequent in the nP group. Conclusion: The 2-weekly nP-based regimen might be a better choice of NST for patients with breast cancer.

Scalp cooling in breast cancer patients treated with docetaxel-cyclophosphamide: patient- and nurse-reported results.

Recent evidence supports the efficacy of scalp cooling in preventing chemotherapy-induced alopecia in breast cancer treatments. However, efficacy largely varies between treatment regimens. The aim of this study was to explore the patient- and nurse-reported results of scalp cooling in terms of hair loss and need for a wig/head cover in patients with breast cancer treated with 3-weekly docetaxel 75mg/m2-cyclophosphamide 600mg/m2. We studied nurse-reported efficacy as noted in the electronic patient files of 85 patients treated with docetaxel 75mg/m2-cyclophosphamide 600mg/m2 between 1/1/2017 and 1/1/2020. Sixty-nine of them also self-reported on their scalp cooling results up to one year after adjuvant chemotherapy in a retrospective way. Nurse- and patient-reported data showed that scalp cooling was successful (i.e., hair loss < 50%) in 47.1 and 44.9% of patients, respectively, and 55% of patients were (very) satisfied with the result of scalp cooling. Scalp cooling was perceived as (very) uncomfortable in 36.2% of patients. Regarding hair status one year after treatment, 47 patients (55.3%) reported no changes compared to their hair status before treatment. Scalp cooling is successful in preventing severe chemotherapy-induced alopecia in almost half of the patients with breast cancer treated with docetaxel 75mg/m2-cyclophosphamide 600mg/m2. Better understanding of the success rate of scalp cooling enables correct patient information and decision-making support.

Role of TDM-based dose adjustments for taxane anticancer drugs.

The classical taxanes (paclitaxel, docetaxel), the newer taxane cabazitaxel and the nanoparticle-bound nab-paclitaxel are among the most widely used anticancer drugs. Still, the optimal use and the value of pharmacological personalization of the taxanes is still controversial. We give an overview on the pharmacological properties of the taxanes, including metabolism, pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamic relations and aspects in the clinical use of taxanes. The latter includes the ongoing debate on the most effective and safe regimen, the recommended initial dose, and pharmacological dosing individualization. The taxanes are among the most widely used anticancer drugs in patients with solid malignancies. Despite their longtime use in clinical routine, the optimal dosing strategy (weekly versus 3-weekly) or optimal average dose (cabazitaxel, nab-paclitaxel) has not been fully resolved, as it may differ according to tumour entity and line of treatment. The value of pharmacological individualization of the taxanes (TDM, TCI) has been partly explored for 3-weekly paclitaxel and docetaxel, but remains mostly unexplored for cabazitaxel and nab-paclitaxel at present.

A randomized phase II trial evaluating the addition of low dose, short course sunitinib to docetaxel in advanced solid tumours

BackgroundWe previously reported that low-dose, short-course sunitinib prior to neoadjuvant doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide (AC) normalised tumour vasculature and improved perfusion, but resulted in neutropenia and delayed subsequent cycles in breast cancer patients. This study combined sunitinib with docetaxel, which has an earlier neutrophil nadir than AC.MethodsPatients with advanced solid cancers were randomized 1:1 to 3-weekly docetaxel 75 mg/m2, with or without sunitinib 12.5 mg daily for 7 days prior to docetaxel, stratified by primary tumour site. Primary endpoints were objective-response (ORR:CR + PR) and clinical-benefit rate (CBR:CR + PR + SD); secondary endpoints were toxicity and progression-free-survival (PFS).ResultsWe enrolled 68 patients from 2 study sites; 33 received docetaxel-sunitinib and 35 docetaxel alone, with 33 breast, 25 lung and 10 patients with other cancers.There was no difference in ORR (30.3% vs 28.6%, p = 0.432, odds-ratio [OR] 1.10, 95% CI 0.38–3.18); CBR was lower in the docetaxel-sunitinib arm (48.5% vs 71.4%, p = 0.027 OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.14–1.01). Median PFS was shorter in the docetaxel-sunitinib arm (2.9 vs 4.9 months, hazard-ratio [HR] 2.00, 95% CI 1.15–3.48, p = 0.014) overall, as well as in breast (4.2 vs 5.6 months, p = 0.048) and other cancers (2.0 vs 5.3 months, p = 0.009), but not in lung cancers (2.9 vs 4.1 months, p = 0.597). Median OS was similar in both arms overall (9.9 vs 10.5 months, HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.51–1.67, p = 0.789), and in the breast (18.9 vs 25.8 months, p = 0.354), lung (7.0 vs 6.7 months, p = 0.970) and other cancers (4.5 vs 8.8 months, p = 0.449) subgroups.Grade 3/4 haematological toxicities were lower with docetaxel-sunitinib (18.2% vs 34.3%, p = 0.132), attributed to greater discretionary use of prophylactic G-CSF (90.9% vs 63.0%, p = 0.024). Grade 3/4 non-haematological toxicities were similar (12.1% vs 14.3%, p = 0.792).ConclusionsThe addition of sunitinib to docetaxel was well-tolerated but did not improve outcomes. The possible negative impact in metastatic breast cancer patients is contrary to results of adding sunitinib to neoadjuvant AC. These negative results suggest that the intermittent administration of sunitinib in the current dose and schedule with docetaxel in advanced solid tumours, particularly breast cancers, is not beneficial.Trial registrationThe study was registered (NCT01803503) prospectively on clinicaltrials.gov on 4th March 2013.

Comparison of Tolerability Between 2-Weekly and 3-Weekly Docetaxel Regimen in Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer

The tolerability of 2-weekly docetaxel at 25-35 mg/m2 for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) has not been fully evaluated. The aim of this study was to evaluate its tolerability compared to 3-weekly docetaxel at 60-75 mg/m2 in patients with CRPC. In this retrospective study, data were compared with respect to efficacy and safety between 2-weekly and 3-weekly docetaxel regimens in patients with CRPC. Time to treatment failure and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate did not differ significantly between the two regimens. Compared to 3-weekly administration, incidence of severe leukopenia and febrile neutropenia was significantly lower (p<0.05), and relative dose intensity was significantly higher (p<0.05) for the 2-weekly schedule. Docetaxel dosage and PSA response were identified as independent risk factors for severe leukopenia. Two-weekly treatment seems better tolerated than three-weekly treatment in Japanese patients with CRPC.

Abstract P2-16-19: Neoadjuvant weekly paclitaxel (wP) and carboplatin (Cb) with trastuzumab (T) and pertuzumab (P) in HER2-positive breast cancer (H+BC): A Brown University oncology group (BrUOG) study

Abstract In H+BC, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) with dual HER2-targeted therapy achieves high pathologic complete response (pCR) rates, but the most common anthracycline-free regimen, every 3-week docetaxel and Cb with T and P (TCHP), causes significant hematologic and non-hematologic toxicities. We conducted a pilot study to assess the efficacy and toxicity of a weekly anthracycline-free regimen, and to assess whether patients (pts) with a suboptimal response to this regimen benefit from switching to doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC). Methods Pts with clinical stage II-III H+BC receive wP 80 mg/m2 and Cb AUC 2 weekly with every 3-week T and P (wPCbTP). Investigators may split the week 1 loading dose of P (840 mg) into two weekly doses, and hold the 2nd dose for early onset toxicity, particularly diarrhea. Pts are restaged after 12 weeks with ultrasound or MRI. Responding pts receive another 6 weeks of wPCbTP, while nonresponders are switched to AC x 4, followed by surgery. Study participation is complete after a 3-month post-op visit. Dose modifications and post-op therapy are at investigator discretion. Results Enrollment (30 pts) is complete. Pathologic findings are available for 23 pts; the other 7 are due to undergo surgery by 10/2019. No pts have required switching to AC for suboptimal response at week 12; 2 have been switched for toxicity (1 each for diarrhea and recurrent cytopenias). pCR (T0/isN0) rates are tabulated below: Pt grouppCR% (95% CI)All18/2378 (56-92) %ER(-)10/1191 (59-100) %ER(+)8/1267 (35-90) %Operable (Stage IIA-IIIA)14/1782 (57-96) %Inoperable (Stage IIIB-C)4/667 (22-96) % In 23 pts, grade 3/4 toxicities observed include neutropenia (10/2, but no febrile neutropenia), anemia (3/0), thrombocytopenia (1/0), diarrhea (4/1), and 5 cases of grade 2 (but no grade ≥3) peripheral neuropathy. One pt each has required hospitalization for recurrent urinary tract, port site or breast infections while not neutropenic. wP has been dose-reduced for neuropathy after week 12 in 8 pts. Two pts discontinued Cb after hypersensitivity reactions in week 10. Treatment was discontinued during weeks 12-18 in 8 pts. P was held during weeks 1-6 for diarrhea in 5 pts and discontinued before week 12 in 3 pts; splitting the loading dose of P has not substantially reduced the incidence or severity of diarrhea. Conclusions Treatment with wPCbTP is associated with a high pCR rate (78%), comparable to those reported with TCHP in multicenter phase II-III trials, and is generally well tolerated, with fewer grade ≥3 toxicities, though diarrhea remains a concern. In some pts, cumulative toxicities make it difficult to continue treatment beyond week 12. Thus far, we have failed to identify a subset of pts in whom to test the efficacy of switching to AC after a suboptimal response to wPCbTP. This regimen appears to be worth exploring further, though we might consider switching to a less toxic regimen, or taking pts with an excellent response to surgery, after week 12. Supported by LifeCycle and the Lura Cook Hull Trust Citation Format: Mary Lorraine Lopresti, Jessica J. Bian, Bachir J Sakr, Rochelle S Strenger, Robert D. Legare, Mary Anne Fenton, Sabrina M Witherby, Don S Dizon, Sonali V Pandya, Ashley R Stuckey, David A Edmondson, Jennifer S Gass, Christine M Emmick, Theresa A Graves, Marlene Cutitar, Adam J Olszewski, William M Sikov. Neoadjuvant weekly paclitaxel (wP) and carboplatin (Cb) with trastuzumab (T) and pertuzumab (P) in HER2-positive breast cancer (H+BC): A Brown University oncology group (BrUOG) study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-16-19.

203P - Long term outcomes of 2-weekly docetaxel in metastatic high-volume hormone sensitive prostate cancer

Background3-weekly Docetaxel along with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) improves overall survival in high volume metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). However, this regimen is associated with 30% incidence of grade 3-5 adverse events. 2-weekly Docetaxel is better tolerated than 3-weekly docetaxel in Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer (CRPC). We sought to determine toxicity and efficacy of 2-weekly docetaxel in high volume mHSPC. We also compared these outcomes to those achieved with 3-weekly docetaxel in CHAARTED Trial. Methods29 patients with high volume mHSPC (as per CHAARTED criteria) received ADT + 2-weekly docetaxel between April 2016 & December 2017. Diagnosis was established by TRUS guided prostate biopsy and staging was done by Ga68 PSMA PET CT scan in all patients. Docetaxel was administered at 50 mg/m2 every 2 weekly for total 10 doses. 23 patients received medical ADT and 6 patients underwent surgical castration. Patients were monitored every 2-weekly during treatment & 3-monthly thereafter. Adverse events were recorded as per CTCAE 4.0. Data was analyzed to determine serological complete response rate (sCR - PSA<0.2ng/ml), time to CRPC and overall survival. ResultsMedian age was 64 years & median PSA was 98 ng/ml (range 11 – 4000). Gleason score was <7 in 1 patient, 7 in 7 patients & 8-10 in 21patients, respectively. Bone, lymph node and visceral metastasis were present in 23, 8 & 8 patients, respectively. 27 patients completed the planned chemotherapy and treatment was well tolerated in most patients. 2 patients developed grade 3 paronychia, 1 patient developed pulmonary tuberculosis and 1 patient died of pneumonia. sCR (PSA<0.2ng/ml) was achieved in 12(41.4%) patients, which compares well with 32% reported in CHAARTED trial. After a median follow up of 24 months, 5 patients have died, 1 lost to follow-up while 23 are alive. 14(48.3%) patients have progressed to CRPC. Median time to CRPC was 17 months, which compares well with 20 months reported in CHAARTED trial. ConclusionsWe conclude that 2-weekly docetaxel is better tolerated and results in acceptable long term outcomes compared to 3-weekly docetaxel in mHSPC. This regimen is currently being explored in a large phase 3 randomized trial. Legal entity responsible for the studyMax Healthcare. FundingHas not received any funding. DisclosureAll authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

A Phase 1 Study of Afatinib in Combination with Postoperative Radiation Therapy with and Without Weekly Docetaxel in Intermediate- and High-Risk Patients with Resected Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck

To determine the maximum tolerated dose and tolerability of (1) afatinib in combination with postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) for patients with intermediate-risk squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) and (2) afatinib in combination with PORT and weekly docetaxel for high-risk SCCHN. An open-label, multicenter, 2-cohort, phase 1 dose-escalation trial was conducted using a 3 + 3 design. Eligible patients had definitive surgery for SCCHN, including the oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx, or hypopharynx and had intermediate- or high-risk pathologic features. Afatinib was given for a 1-week lead in before PORT and daily during 6 to 6.5 weeks of PORT with or without weekly docetaxel. The starting dose was 30 mg and could be escalated to 40 mg or de-escalated to 20 mg. The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose of afatinib with PORT or PORT + docetaxel. Between April 2013 and November 2017, 27 patients were enrolled and started study treatment, including 16 intermediate-risk patients and 11 high-risk patients, all with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 1. Most patients (n = 25) had oral cavity cancer and were treated to a median total dose of 60 Gy in the intermediate-risk arm and 65 Gy in the high-risk arm. There was 1 grade 4 event, but no deaths. The maximum tolerated dose was not established owing to dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in both arms. In the high-risk arm, DLTs were grade 3 mucositis (n = 3) and grade 3 diarrhea/hypokalemia (n = 1). In the intermediate-risk arm, DLTs were grade 3 mucositis (n = 4) and grade 3 diarrhea (n = 2). Afatinib in combination with PORT for mucosal SCCHN was difficult to tolerate because of grade 3 toxicity, mostly mucositis, in a cohort of patients requiring high-dose PORT to the oral cavity. This regimen may be better tolerated for a non-oral cavity site or if given in a different schedule.

The Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Four-Weekly Docetaxel as First-Line Therapy in Elderly Lung Cancer Patients with Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

BackgroundDocetaxel is one of the standard treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Docetaxel is usually administered in a 3-week schedule, but there is significant toxicity. In this phase II clinical study, we investigated the efficacy and safety of a 4-weekly schedule of docetaxel monotherapy, as first-line chemotherapy for advanced squamous cell carcinoma in elderly lung cancer patients.MethodsPatients with stage IIIB/ IV lung squamous-cell carcinoma age 70 or older, that had not undergone cytotoxic chemotherapy were enrolled. Patients received docetaxel 25 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15, every 4 weeks. Primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity profiles.ResultsA total of 19 patients were enrolled. Among 19 patients, 17 were for evaluated efficacy and safety. In the intent-to-treat population, ORR and disease control rate (DCR) were 11.8% and 47.1%, respectively. In the response evaluable population, ORR was 16.7% and DCR was 66.7%. Median PFS and OS were 3.1 months and 3.3 months, respectively. There were three adverse grade 3/4 events. Grade 1 neutropenia was reported in one patient.ConclusionOur data failed to demonstrate efficacy of a 4-weekly docetaxel regimen, in elderly patients with a poor performance status. However, incidence of side effects, including neutropenia, was lower than with a 3-week docetaxel regimen, as previously reported.

Phase 2 Randomized Study of Radiation Therapy and 3-Year Androgen Deprivation With or Without Concurrent Weekly Docetaxel in High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer Patients

Docetaxel improves survival in patients with metastatic prostate cancer. This randomized phase 2 trial aimed to assess the activity of weekly docetaxel with radiation therapy (RT) plus androgen deprivation in patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer. The study examined the benefit of 9 weekly docetaxel administrations to RT plus 3years of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogues. A total of 132 patients were recruited for the study. Patients' characteristics included T3-T4 stage (81.1%), Gleason score ≥8 (77.3%), prostate-specific antigen level >20ng/mL (28.9%), and pN+ (18.2%). All patients included in the trial received either the standard-of-care control arm with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogues plus RT (arm A) or the experimental arm (RT+9 weekly cycles of docetaxel+3years of androgen deprivation therapy, arm B). The primary objective was to achieve a high percentage of patients who were free of biochemical recurrence within 5years of randomization. Secondary endpoints included biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), clinical response rate, biochemical response rate, and toxicity. No difference between the arms of the study was found in biochemical recurrence (93.4% at 60months for arm A vs 85.3% for arm B; P=.3297). PFS at 60months was 93.4% and 83.7% in arms A and B, respectively (P=.2532). Five-year survival was 93.3% (95% confidence interval, 83.1-97.45) in arm A versus 93.6% (83.8-97.55) in arm B; median PFS and OS have not been reached. Prostate-specific antigen level ≤0.2ng/mL at 3months after the end of treatment was seen in 81.25% of patients in arm A compared with 90.48% of patients in arm B (P=.2028). BRFS was not significantly different between treatment arms. Diarrhea was the main nonhematologic toxicity. Long-term follow-up has not yet been enough to meet median PFS and OS. Concurrent weekly docetaxel can be administered safely with standard doses of RT without a significant increase in the toxicity profile. No statistically significant differences for 5-year BRFS, PFS, and OS have been observed when docetaxel was added to conventional treatment.

A Phase I Clinical Trial of AZD1775 in Combination with Neoadjuvant Weekly Docetaxel and Cisplatin before Definitive Therapy in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Purpose: The WEE1 tyrosine kinase regulates G2-M transition and maintains genomic stability, particularly in p53-deficient tumors which require DNA repair after genotoxic therapy. Thus, a need arises to exploit the role of WEE1 inhibition in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) mostly driven by tumor-suppressor loss. This completed phase I clinical trial represents the first published clinical experience using the WEE1 inhibitor, AZD1775, with cisplatin and docetaxel.Patients and Methods: We implemented an open-label phase I clinical trial using a 3+3 dose-escalation design for patients with stage III/IVB HNSCC with borderline-resectable or -unresectable disease, but who were candidates for definitive chemoradiation. Escalating AZD1775 was administered orally twice a day over 2.5 days on the first week, then in combination with fixed cisplatin (25 mg/m2) and docetaxel (35 mg/m2) for 3 additional weeks. The primary outcome measure was adverse events to establish MTD. Secondary measures included response rates, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics, and genomic data.Results: The MTD for AZD1775 was established at 150 mg orally twice per day for 2.5 days. RECISTv1.1 responses were seen in 5 of 10 patients; histologic adjustment revealed three additional responders. The only drug-limiting toxicity was grade 3 diarrhea. The PK C8hr target of 240 nmol/L was achieved on day 4 at all three doses tested. Pharmacodynamic analysis revealed a reduction in pY15-Cdk, and increases in γH2AX, CC3, and RPA32/RPA2 were noted in responders versus nonresponders.Conclusions: The triplet combination of AZD1775, cisplatin, and docetaxel is safe and tolerable. Preliminary results show promising antitumor efficacy in advanced HNSCC, meriting further investigation at the recommended phase II dose. Clin Cancer Res; 24(12); 2740-8. ©2018 AACR.

Effect of Adjuvant Trastuzumab for a Duration of 9 Weeks vs 1 Year With Concomitant Chemotherapy for Early Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Positive Breast Cancer

Trastuzumab plus chemotherapy is the standard adjuvant treatment for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive early breast cancer. While the standard duration of trastuzumab treatment is 12 months, the benefits and harms of trastuzumab continued beyond the chemotherapy are unclear. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of adjuvant trastuzumab continued beyond chemotherapy in women treated with up-front chemotherapy containing a taxane and trastuzumab. Open-label, randomized (1:1) clinical trial including women with HER2-positive breast cancer. Chemotherapy was identical in the 2 groups, consisting of 3 cycles of 3-weekly docetaxel (either 80 or 100 mg/m2) plus trastuzumab for 9 weeks, followed by 3 cycles of fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide. Thereafter, no trastuzumab was administered in the 9-week group, whereas controls received trastuzumab to complete 1 year of administration. Disease-free survival (DFS) was compared between the groups using a Cox model and the noninferiority approach. The estimated sample size was 2168 patients (1-sided testing, with a relative noninferiority margin of 1.3). From January 3, 2008, to December 16, 2014, 2176 patients were accrued from 7 countries. Docetaxel plus trastuzumab for 9 weeks, followed by 3 cycles of fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide in both groups. Controls continued trastuzumab to 1 year. The primary objective was DFS; secondary objectives included distant disease-free survival, overall survival, cardiac DFS, and safety. In the 2174 women analyzed, median age was 56 (interquartile range [IQR], 48-64) years. The median follow-up was 5.2 (IQR, 3.8-6.7) years. Noninferiority of the 9-week treatment could not be demonstrated for DFS (hazard ratio, 1.39; 2-sided 90% CI, 1.12-1.72). Distant disease-free survival and overall survival did not differ substantially between the groups. Thirty-six (3%) and 21 (2%) patients in the 1-year and the 9-week groups, respectively, had cardiac failure; the left ventricle ejection fraction was better maintained in the 9-week group. An interaction was detected between the docetaxel dose and DFS; patients in the 9-week group treated with 80 mg/m2 had inferior and those treated with 100 mg/m2 had similar DFS as patients in the 1-year group. Nine weeks of trastuzumab was not noninferior to 1 year of trastuzumab when given with similar chemotherapy. Cardiac safety was better in the 9-week group. The docetaxel dosing with trastuzumab requires further study. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00593697.

Abstract GS3-04: A randomized phase III study of adjuvant trastuzumab for a duration of 9 weeks versus 1 year, combined with adjuvant taxane-anthracycline chemotherapy, for early HER2-positive breast cancer (the SOLD study)

Abstract Background: The optimal duration of trastuzumab (T), when given together with chemotherapy and after chemotherapy as adjuvant treatment in patients with HER2+ breast cancer (BC), is unknown. Whilst the international standard is 12 months of T, the benefits and harms of T treatment continued beyond the chemotherapy are unclear. Methods: Women with histologically confirmed node-negative or node-positive HER2+ BC were eligible for the trial (NCT00593697). The primary tumor diameter was required to be &amp;gt;5 mm in node-negative cancer. Patients with distant metastases, inflammatory cancer, clinically significant cardiac disease, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) &amp;lt;50%, unknown estrogen receptor (ER) status, World Health Organization performance status &amp;gt;1, and those who had received neoadjuvant systemic cancer therapy were excluded. Patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups prior to starting systemic cancer therapy. The initial systemic treatment was identical in the groups consisting of 3 cycles of 3-weekly docetaxel plus T followed by 3 cycles of fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FE75C). Thereafter, no further T or chemotherapy was administered in Arm A, whereas in Arm B single-agent T was administered 3-weekly for 14 cycles to complete 1 year of T treatment. The docetaxel dose was either 80 mg/m2 or 100 mg/m2 (prespecified for each center). Radiation therapy and endocrine therapy (for patients with ER+ cancer) were given according to the institutional practice; the minimum scheduled duration of endocrine therapy was 5 years. The LVEF was measured pretreatment, and on study weeks 18, 31, 43, and 61 and month 36. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS) compared between the groups using a Cox model and the non-inferiority approach. Results: A total of 2,176 patients were entered into the study from 63 centers in 7 countries from Jan. 3, 2008 to Dec.16, 2014. The median follow-up time was 5.2 years at data collection closure (Dec. 31, 2016). The efficacy and safety data will be presented at the meeting. Citation Format: Joensuu H, Fraser J, Wildiers H, Huovinen R, Auvinen P, Utriainen M, Nyandoto P, Villman KK, Halonen P, Granstam-Björneklett H, Lundgren L, Yachnin J, Turpeenniemi-Hujanen T, Ritchie D, Huttunen T, Neven P, Canney P, Harvey VJ, Kellokumpu-Lehtinen P-L, Lindman H. A randomized phase III study of adjuvant trastuzumab for a duration of 9 weeks versus 1 year, combined with adjuvant taxane-anthracycline chemotherapy, for early HER2-positive breast cancer (the SOLD study) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS3-04.

P2.01-035 Phase II Study: Weekly Docetaxel as First Line Chemotherapy for Elderly Patients with Squamous-Cell Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

P2.01-035 Phase II Study: Weekly Docetaxel as First Line Chemotherapy for Elderly Patients with Squamous-Cell Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Phase 2 Multicenter Trial Evaluating the Role of Induction TPF Followed by Weekly Docetaxel and Cetuximab in Combination With IMRT for Locally Recurrent Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Phase 2 Multicenter Trial Evaluating the Role of Induction TPF Followed by Weekly Docetaxel and Cetuximab in Combination With IMRT for Locally Recurrent Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma