28-mm Femoral Head Research Articles

Discontinuing the recommendation of hip precautions does not increase the risk of early dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty using 36-mm heads: a population-based study from the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register.

Dislocation is a severe complication following total hip arthroplasty (THA). Hip precautions have been recommended in the initial postoperative period but evidence supporting this practice is limited. We therefore conducted a population-based study to evaluate the association between discontinuing recommending postoperative hip precautions and the risk of early dislocation. This is a cohort study with data from the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register and the Danish National Patient Register. We included patients who underwent primary THA for osteoarthritis in 2004-2019 in public hospitals in the Capital Region of Denmark. The cohort was divided into the hip precautions group, comprising patients operated on between 2004 and 2009, and the no-precautions group operated on between 2014 and 2019. The primary outcome was the difference in the absolute risk of dislocation within 3 months post-surgery. The secondary outcome assessed the same risk within 2 years. We evaluated the difference in absolute risk using absolute risk regression (ARR). The cumulative incidence of dislocation within 3 months was 2.9% (confidence interval [CI] 2.5-3.3) in the hip precautions group and 3.5% (CI 3.1-3.9) in the no-precautions group. The risk of dislocation was higher in the no-precautions group but failed to reach statistical significance in the crude (ARR 1.2, CI 0.9-1.6) and multivariate model (ARR 1.4, CI 0.9-2.2). We found a higher but statistically insignificant increase in the risk of early dislocation in the no-precautions group. The lack of significance in the association may be explained by the increased use of 36-mm femoral heads after the guideline revision.

No Revisions Attributable to Wear of Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene Liners: A Long-Term Follow-Up Study

BackgroundThere is a paucity of data beyond 15 years on the survivorship of total hip arthroplasty since the introduction of highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) liners. Our aim was to evaluate implant survivorship, liner wear rates, and clinical outcomes after primary total hip arthroplasty using HXLPE liners implanted between 1999 and 2002. MethodsBetween 1999 and 2002, 690 primary total hip arthroplasties utilizing 28-mm femoral heads and HXLPE liners of a single design were identified using our institutional total joint registry. Femoral heads were made of metal in 96% of cases and ceramic in 4%. The mean age was 56 years, 48% were women, and the mean body mass index was 30. Survivorship analyses were performed for the outcomes of implant revision, reoperation, and complications for the entire cohort. Linear HXLPE liner wear rates were determined on 197 hips with radiographs with more than 18.5 years of follow-up. ResultsAt 20 years, survivorship free of revision was 94%, free of reoperation was 92%, and free of any complication was 81%. There were no documented wear-related revisions. The linear wear rate at a mean of 20.3 years postoperatively was 0.02 mm/y. There was no statistically significant difference in measured wear observed between the first available postoperative radiographs and those taken at the final follow-up. The use of elevated liners, patient body mass index, age, preoperative diagnosis, acetabular component inclination, and anteversion angles were not associated with increased wear rates. Mean Harris hip scores improved from 52 preoperatively to 90 at greater than 18.5 years ConclusionsPrimary total hip arthroplasties using a single first-generation HXLPE liner demonstrated excellent survivorship and clinical outcomes at long-term follow-up with no wear-related revisions. Wear rates of HXLPE liners at 20 years are exceedingly low and are not significantly impacted by acetabular component position or patient-dependent variables such as BMI. Level of EvidenceIV

Safety of using a large femoral head on thin polyethylene for total hip arthroplasty based on different types of polyethylene

The use of a large femoral head in total hip arthroplasty (THA) to stabilize and reduce the incidence of dislocation is on the increase, but concerns arise when combining them with small acetabular components due to potential mechanical failures in thin polyethylene (PE) liners. A single-institution, retrospective cohort study was conducted on 116 patients with minimum 2-year follow-up who received 36-mm femoral heads and acetabular components ≤ 52 mm, using either remelted highly cross-linked polyethylene (remelted HXLPE) or vitamin E-infused HXLPE (VEPE). Osteolysis and implant loosening were not observed in either group. Although a fracture of the PE liner was observed in each group (1.7%), the clinical outcomes were excellent, as the mean modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) at the last follow-up was 93.5. Moreover, the mean linear wear rates measured by digital imaging software in both groups were low, with 0.035 mm/y in remelted HXLPE and 0.030 mm/y in VEPE. In conclusion, The use of a large femoral head on a thin PE liner can be a viable treatment option in patients who need to prioritize stability; however, careful attention should be paid to mechanical fractures of the PE liner.

The Use of a High Offset Fully Coated Collarless Cementless Stem Does Not Result in Early Failures in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

The Corail femoral stem has excellent long-term survivorship in total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, there remains a paucity of information on the specific performance of the high offset collarless stem in relation to subsidence, loosening, offset, and failure rates. Retrospective data were collected on all consecutive high offset collarless Corail stems implanted at a single centre in the UK. Data included patient demographics, femoral Dorr classification, radiographic analysis for radiolucent lines, and stem subsidence. The postoperative femoral offset was measured against the native offset of the contralateral hip. Any early failures, re-operations, or requirements for revision surgery were recorded. We identified 162 stems for inclusion in the study. Ninety-five patients were male. The mean age was 60.5 (40 to 78) years, and the mean BMI was 29.8 (21 to 50) kg/m2. The mean length of follow-up was 84.5 (12-130) months. Subsidence was recorded on 113 (69.7%) stems. The mean amount of total stem subsidence in the whole cohort was 1.62mm (0 to 3.9mm). There was no correlation between the amount of subsidence and the preoperative Dorr classification, age, sex, BMI, or indication for surgery. Radiolucent lines were exclusively seen in stems paired with a large-diameter 36-mm femoral head. The high offset stem accurately reproduced native femoral offset; the mean difference in offset was -1.21mm (-24mm to +21mm). There were no early failures, re-operations, or revision surgeries. The use of a high offset stem can accurately reproduce native femoral offset when chosen for THA. The high offset collarless Corail stem does not result in early failures in THA, and we support its use.

Polyethylene thickness does not influence aseptic revision rate with highly cross-linked liners in THA with 36-mm femoral heads.

To reduce the risk of dislocation, larger head size can be used in total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, larger head size leads to thinner acetabular liners. With conventional polyethylene, thickness of >8 mm has been advocated to reduce stress and wear rate of the polyethylene. Modern polyethylene has become more wear-resistant. In this study, we investigated if the thickness of sequentially cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE) liners is associated with failure of THA in the medium term. 3654 THAs were included (2009-2016), in which THA was performed with a XLPE liner in combination with a 36-mm femoral head. Patient and surgical characteristics were collected. We compared implant survival of THA with thin liners (<7.9 mm) and thick liners (⩾7.9 mm) with a Kaplan Meier survival analysis at 5 years, median follow-up and 10 years of follow-up with and point aseptic loosening and performed a multivariate analysis to estimate hazard ratios (HR). Median follow-up was 7.7 years (IQR 5.6-9.8). In total, 179 revision procedures were performed, where 82 revisions (46%) were performed for aseptic loosening. The survival rate at 5 years, median and 10 years of follow-up showed no statistically significant difference in implant survival. The survival rate at 10 years follow-up was for thin liners 97.1% (95% CI, 96.3-97.9) and for thick liners 98.2% (95% CI, 97.4-99.0) in the aseptic loosening group (chi-square 2.55; p = 0.11).The adjusted HR for thick liners (⩾7.9 mm) was 0.65 (95% CI, 0.38-1.08) compared with the thin liners (<7.9 mm), which was not significantly different. From this single-centre retrospective study it appears that thinner polyethylene liners are well tolerated when using second-generation highly cross-linked polyethylene. Thickness of the XLPE liners did not influence the risk of aseptic loosening of the implants in the medium term.

Large Femoral Heads With Small Acetabular Components: An Examination of 10-Year Polyethylene Wear.

Highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) has improved polyethylene (PE) wear rates while decreasing osteolysis and aseptic loosening. However, concerns exist regarding the risk of mechanical failure with thin HXLPE liners in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Our purpose was to evaluate long-term outcomes and PE wear rates in primary THAs pairing large femoral heads with small acetabular components and thin HXLPE liners. We retrospectively reviewed 29 patients who underwent 33 primary THAs using large femoral heads (32 or 36 mm) with small acetabular components (48 or 50 mm) and thin HXLPE liners (3.9 or 5.9 mm) at minimum 10-year follow-up. PE liner wear was measured using a validated radiographic technique. Mean age was 66 years, 97% of the patients were women, and mean body mass index was 26.3 kg/m2. Thirty hips (90.9%) had ceramic femoral heads, and 13 hips (39%) had 36-mm femoral heads with 3.9-mm HXLPE liners. All cases used a neutral PE design. Mean linear wear rate and volumetric wear rate were 0.04 mm/year and 39.6 mm3/year, respectively, at mean 10.9-year follow-up. There were no instances of liner fracture, liner dissociation, or revision. Mean Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (HOOS, JR) was 92.1. In the largest long-term study of primary THAs using large femoral heads with small acetabular components and thin HXLPE liners, we found low linear and volumetric wear rates and no cases of liner mechanical failures. Thin HXLPE liners are a safe and viable option for THA surgeons. [Orthopedics. 2024;47(2):118-122.].

In vivo creep and wear performance of vitamin-E-diffused highly crosslinked polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty.

An acetabular liner thickness of around 6mm remains the "gold standard" in total hip arthroplasty. Some surgeons have been recommending the use of the thickest possible liner because contact stress and strain in articulating surfaces decrease with increasing the wall thickness. The purpose of this study was to determine whether in vivo creep and wear performance could be enhanced using a thicker liner over the standard thickness in vitamin-E-diffused highly crosslinked polyethylene (HXLPE). One hundred and twenty-two hips were allocated to age-matched, sex-matched, and body mass index-matched two subgroups implanted either with a 6.8- or 8.9-mm-thick vitamin-E-diffused HXLPE liner against 28-mm cobalt-chrome femoral head, and followed-up for 7years. Linear and volumetric penetration of femoral head into the liners attributed to creep and wear were analyzed for each group. Compressive creep strain generated at the initial 6months was significantly larger in the 6.8-mm group (2.6%) than in the 8.9-mm group (2.2%). The linear steady-state wear observed after 2years was 0.0019 and 0.0015mm/year, whereas the volumetric steady-state wear was 0.54 and 0.45 mm3/years in the 6.8- and 8.9-mm-thick groups, respectively. Although less strain in the thicker group resulted in a slightly less wear, it did not reach significant differences in the steady-state wear rates between the groups. No clinical significance for using a thicker liner over the standard thickness (6.8mm → 8.9mm) was confirmed in the vitamin-E-diffused HXLPE according to the 7-year follow-up. The wear rates for both thicknesses were very low enough to prevent osteolysis, and no mechanical failure was observed at any follow-up interval. Nevertheless, since the significantly higher strain was seen in the thinner liner, further follow-up is needed to compare the longer term wear and the incidence of osteolysis and component fracture.

Dynamic computational wear model of PEEK-on-XLPE bearing couple in total hip replacements.

Understanding wear mechanisms is a key factor to prevent primary failures causing revision surgery in total hip replacement (THR) applications. This study introduces a wear prediction model of (Polyetheretherketone) PEEK-on-XLPE (cross-linked polyethylene) bearing couple utilized to investigate the wear mechanism under 3D-gait cycle loading over 5 million cycles (Mc). A 32-mm PEEK femoral head and 4-mm thick XLPE bearing liner with a 3-mm PEEK shell are modeled in a 3D explicit finite element modeling (FEM) program. The volumetric and linear wear rates of XLPE liner per every million cycles were predicted as 1.965 mm3/Mc, and 0.0032 mm/Mc respectively. These results are consistent with the literature. PEEK-on-XLPE bearing couple exhibits a promising wear performance used in THR application. The wear pattern evolution of the model is similar to that of conventional polyethylene liners. Therefore, PEEK could be proposed as an alternative material to the CoCr head, especially used in XLPE-bearing couples. The wear prediction model could be utilized to improve the design parameters with the aim of prolonging the life span of hip implants.

Combined Anteversion Threshold to Avoid Anterior Dislocation in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Performed Through the Direct Anterior Approach

BackgroundComponent malposition in total hip arthroplasty (THA) can lead to dislocation, early implant failure, and revision surgery. As the surgical approach might affect the targeted combined anteversion (CA) of THA components, the present study aimed to evaluate the optimal CA threshold to avoid anterior dislocation in primary THA performed through a direct anterior approach (DAA). MethodsA total of 1,176 THAs in 1,147 consecutive patients (men: 593, women: 554) who had an average age of 63 years (range, 24 to 91) and a mean body mass index of 29 (range, 15 to 48) were identified. Medical records were reviewed for dislocation, whereas postoperative radiographs were assessed to measure the acetabular inclination and CA using a previously validated radiographic method. ResultsAn anterior dislocation occurred in 19 patients at an average of 40 days postoperatively. The average CA in patients who did and did not have a dislocation was 66 ± 8° and 45 ± 11°, respectively (P < .001). In 5 of 19 of the patients, a THA was performed for secondary osteoarthritis and 17 of 19 had a 28-mm femoral head. A CA ≥ 60° yielded a sensitivity of 93% and specificity of 90% for predicting an anterior dislocation in the present cohort. A CA ≥ 60° was associated with a significantly higher risk of anterior dislocation (odds ratio = 75.6; P < .001) compared to patients who had a CA<60 points. ConclusionThe optimal CA to avoid anterior dislocations in THA performed through the DAA should be less than 60°. Level of EvidenceCross-sectional study, Level III.

Use of dual-mobility cup in primary total hip arthroplasties: an Italian regional register (RIPO) study on three thousand, seven hundred and ten cases

PurposeThe purpose of the study was to investigate the outcome of dual-mobility cup (DM) compared with a standard cup (SC) in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) in the long-term follow-up based on a regional Italian joint registry (RIPO).MethodsThe Registry of Prosthetic Orthopaedic Implant (RIPO) was consulted, looking for all primary THAs implanted from 2000 to 2019. Three thousand seven hundred ten were dual-mobility cup (DM) total hip arthroplasties (THA) and 85.816 were standard cup (SC) THAs, on a total of 89.526 primary THA. Demographics, survival rates and causes of revision were evaluated and compared between the two groups.ResultsThe use of DM progressively increased from 0.4% in 2000 to 7.5% in 2018 of all primary THAs. Revision rate was 3.5% (128 on 3710) for DMC and 4.7% (4061 on 85,816) for SC. DM presented lower dislocation rate if compared to SC with 22–28-mm femoral head diameter. However, DM showed a higher risk of revision for any causes than SC with 32-mm femoral head diameter in long-term follow-up. Nevertheless, no significant difference was measured in terms of demographics and surgical approach for dislocation rate.ConclusionsThe DM cup represents a valid implant solution and has a lower dislocation rate than 22–28-mm SC. A slight increase in the use of DM implants over time was observed in the RIPO. However, a larger population and a longer follow-up are needed to further monitor the survival rate of new-generation DM implants.

Short-term outcomes of thin highly cross-linked polyethylene liners in primary total hip arthroplasty.

The use of thin highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) liners in total hip arthroplasty (THA) allows utilisation of larger femoral heads. However, concern surrounding postoperative complications remains. This study aims to investigate rates of revision and re-admission associated with thin HXLPE liners at short-term follow-up. We retrospectively reviewed 3047 patients who underwent THA with a cementless modular acetabular implant with a 36-mm femoral head, and different thicknesses of HXPLE liners from 2011 to 2021. We identified 723 patients (23.7%) with a minimum 2-year follow-up and 206 patients (6.8%) with a minimum 5-year follow-up. Patients in the thin group (TG, n = 1020) received <5.1-mm liners with 52-mm size cups while patients in the non-thin group (NTG, n = 2027) received >5.1-mm liners with >52-mm size cups. Outcomes were compared using multi-variable logistic regressions while controlling for all significant demographic differences. We found no significant differences in re-admission (3.9% vs. 4.3%, OR 0.97; 95% CI, 0.63-1.49; p = 0.874) and revision (2.5% vs. 3.2%, OR 0.72; 95% CI, 0.41-1.26; p = 0.246) rates between groups. The difference in fracture rate between groups was not significant, but the 1 recorded acetabular fracture (5%) occurred in the NTG. Although the rate of liner exchange was lower in the TG (1.1%) compared to the NTG (2.3%), the difference was not statistically significant (OR 0.51; 95% CI, 0.24-1.05; p = 0.068). Liners were exchanged for liner wear in 1 hip (1%), aseptic reasons in 38 hips (66%), and peri-prosthetic joint infection in 19 hips (33%). Patients undergoing THA with a thin liner were not significantly predisposed to higher rates of revision surgery or poorer clinical outcomes at short-term follow-up when compared to those who received a thicker liner. Consequently, further long-term studies regarding the utility of thin HXLPE implants in reducing complications should be pursued.

A Comparison of Revision Rates and Dislocation After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty with 28, 32, and 36-mm Femoral Heads and Different Cup Sizes: An Analysis of 188,591 Primary Total Hip Arthroplasties.

This article was updated on August 17, 2022, because of previous errors, which were discovered after the preliminary version of the article was posted online. On page 1462, in the first sentence of the Abstract section entitled "Results," the phrase that had read "and 36-mm heads had fewer dislocations than 28-mm (HR = 0.33 [95% CI, 0.16 to 0.68]; p = 0.003), but more dislocations than 32-mm heads (HR for >2 weeks = 2.25 [95% CI, 1.13 to 4.49]; p = 0.021)" now reads "and 36-mm heads had fewer dislocations than 28-mm (HR = 0.33 [95% CI, 0.16 to 0.68]; p = 0.003) and 32-mm heads (HR for ≥2 weeks = 0.44 [95% CI, 0.22 to 0.88]; p = 0.021)." On page 1468, in the last sentence of the section entitled "Acetabular Components with a Diameter of <51 mm," the phrase that had read "and HR for ≥2 weeks = 2.25 [95% CI, 1.13 to 4.49; p = 0.021]) ( Fig. 3 )" now reads "and HR for ≥2 weeks = 0.44 [95% CI, 0.22 to 0.88; p = 0.021]) ( Fig. 3 )." Finally, on page 1466, in the upper right corner of Figure 3 , under "32mm vs 36mm," the second line that had read "2Wks+: HR=2.25 (1.13, 4.49), p=0.021" now reads "2Wks+: HR=0.44 (0.22, 0.88), p= 0.021."

To what extent could the acetabular liner thickness be reduced yet remaining tribologically acceptable in metal‐on‐vitamin E‐diffused crosslinked polyethylene hip arthroplasty?

The aim of the present study was to evaluate how much reduction in acetabular liner thickness could be tribologically acceptable in metal-on-vitamin-E diffused highly crosslinked ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (Vit-E XLPE) bearings for total hip arthroplasty. We tested thick- (10.3 mm), moderate- (6.3 mm), and thin- (4.3 mm) Vit-E XLPE liners coupled with 28-mm cobalt-chromium femoral heads on a hip simulator to 5 million cycles, and peak contact stress was predicted based on mathematical modeling. Wear damage was also evaluated in terms of surface topology and morphology. Wear simulation demonstrated that the 2-4 mm thickness reduction (6.3 → 4.3 mm and 10.3 → 6.3 mm) did not significantly affect the wear rate for Vit-E XLPE liner, whereas 6-mm reduction (10.3 → 4.3 mm) significantly increased liner wear (by 309%) and head roughness (by 415%). This effect was attributed to a contact stress increase (by 24-41%). However, the wear rates for all thicknesses tested were much lower than those previously reported for thicker non-crosslinked materials. The original crystalline morphology was maintained in all liners after wear. Our results suggest that the 2-4 mm thickness reduction may be tribologically acceptable in Vit-E XLPE liners. However, more severe and longer term simulations are necessary to determine a minimum acceptable thickness.

Creation of a Total Hip Arthroplasty Patient-Specific Dislocation Risk Calculator.

Many risk factors have been described for dislocation following total hip arthroplasty (THA), yet a patient-specific risk assessment tool remains elusive. The purpose of this study was to develop a high-dimensional, patient-specific risk-stratification nomogram that allows dynamic risk modification based on operative decisions. In this study, 29,349 THAs, including 21,978 primary and 7371 revision cases, performed between 1998 and 2018 were evaluated. During a mean 6-year follow-up, 1521 THAs were followed by a dislocation. Patients were characterized, through individual-chart review, according to non-modifiable factors (demographics, indication for THA, spine disease, prior spine surgery, and neurologic disease) and modifiable operative decisions (operative approach, femoral head diameter, and type of acetabular liner [standard, elevated, constrained, or dual-mobility]). Multivariable regression models and nomograms were developed with dislocation as a binary outcome at 1 year and 5 years postoperatively. Dislocation risk, based on patient-specific comorbidities and operative decisions, was wide-ranging-from 0.3% to 13% at 1 year and from 0.4% to 19% at 5 years after primary THA, and from 2% to 32% at 1 year and from 3% to 42% at 5 years after revision THA. In the primary-THA group, the direct anterior approach (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.27) and lateral approach (HR = 0.58) decreased the dislocation risk compared with the posterior approach. After adjusting for the approach in that group, the combination of a ≥36-mm-diameter femoral head and an elevated liner yielded the largest decrease in dislocation risk (HR = 0.28), followed by dual-mobility constructs (HR = 0.48). In the patients who underwent revision THA, the adjusted risk of dislocation was most markedly decreased by the use of a dual-mobility construct (HR = 0.40), followed by a ≥36-mm femoral head and an elevated liner (HR = 0.88). The adjusted risk of dislocation after revision THA was decreased by acetabular revision (HR = 0.58), irrespective of whether other components were revised. Our patient-specific dislocation risk calculator, which was strengthened by our use of a robust multivariable model that accounted for comorbidities associated with instability, demonstrated wide-ranging patient-specific risks based on comorbidity profiles. The resultant nomograms can be used as a screening tool to identify patients at high risk for dislocation following THA and to individualize operative decisions for evidence-based risk mitigation. Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Revision for Aseptic Loosening of Highly Porous Acetabular Components in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 20,993 Total Hip Replacements.

Highly porous-coated titanium acetabular components have a high coefficient of friction and ultraporous surfaces to enhance bone ingrowth and osseointegration in total hip arthroplasty (THA). There have been concerns with the development of early radiolucent lines and aseptic loosening of highly porous acetabular components. It is unclear whether these concerns relate to a specific implant or the entire class. The aim of this study is to compare the revision rates for aseptic loosening of highly porous acetabular combinations in primary THA using data from a large joint replacement registry. Data were retrieved from the Australian Orthopedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry for the study period September 1999 to December 2019. All primary THA procedures recorded and performed for osteoarthritis using the most common combinations for each highly porous acetabular component with highly cross-linked polyethylene and a 32-mm or 36-mm femoral head were included. The primary outcome measure was revision for aseptic loosening of the acetabular component. Results were adjusted for patient age and gender. There were 20,993 primary THA procedures performed for osteoarthritis using a highly porous acetabular component across 6 combinations. Relative to the POLARSTEM/R3 (StikTite), the Exeter V40/Tritanium had a significantly higher risk of revision for aseptic loosening of the acetabular component (hazard ratio 0.21, 95% confidence interval 0.06-0.74, P= .014). There was no difference between any other highly porous acetabular component combination and no late revisions for aseptic loosening. Highly porous-coated titanium acetabular components have low rates of aseptic loosening with long-term follow-up. A difference between components may exist. Level III.

Does Implant Selection Affect Patient-Reported Outcome Measures After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty?

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a reliable operation, but it is critical that orthopaedic surgeons characterize which surgical factors influence patient-reported outcomes. The purpose of this study was to determine whether implant selection at the time of THA affects the odds of having (1) inadequate improvement according to patient-reported pain, function, and activity; (2) failure to achieve a substantial clinical benefit (SCB) with respect to pain; or (3) failure to achieve a patient-acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) according to pain and function. Prospective data were collected from 4,716 patients who underwent primary THA (from July 2015 to August 2018) in a single health-care system with standardized care pathways. Patients were categorized according to the type of femoral and acetabular components and bearing surface used. Outcomes included 1-year postoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and improvement in the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) and the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score. Inadequate improvement was defined as PROMs that changed by less than the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the HOOS pain and physical function short form (PS) and as failure to improve beyond a mostly homebound activity status for the UCLA activity score (a score of ≤3). The MCID and SCB thresholds were set at values reported in the literature. One-year PROM data were available for 3,519 patients (74.6%). There were no differences in the proportion of patients who attained the MCID in terms of HOOS pain, HOOS PS, or UCLA activity scores at 1 year for all analyzed implant parameters. Multivariate regression demonstrated that implant selection was not a significant driver of inadequate improvement, according to HOOS pain and HOOS PS (p > 0.05). Larger (36-mm) femoral heads demonstrated lower odds of inadequate improvement versus 28-mm femoral heads according to UCLA activity scores (odds ratio [OR]: 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.47 to 0.86; p = 0.003). Implant-related criteria were not significant drivers of attaining a PASS or achieving an SCB with respect to HOOS pain. For the most part, THA implant characteristics are not drivers of inadequate improvement with respect to pain and function. Surgeons should utilize implants with an acceptable track record that allow stable fixation and restoration of hip biomechanics. Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Correction to: Short‑term clinical and radiographic outcomes of total hip arthroplasty with PMPC‑grafted highly cross‑linked polyethylene liners against 32‑mm femoral heads

A correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10047-021-01258-4

Short-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of total hip arthroplasty with PMPC-grafted highly cross-linked polyethylene liners against 32-mm femoral heads

We evaluated the clinical and radiographic outcomes of femoral head penetration and total hip arthroplasties with untreated and poly (2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine) (PMPC)-grafted highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) acetabular liners against 26-, 28-, and 32-mm cobalt–chromium alloy femoral heads 3 years after the index surgery. Three combinations of the articulating surfaces were evaluated in the present study: untreated or PMPC-grafted HXLPE liner against 26- or 28-mm femoral heads (n = 16, 24) [control (26 or 28 mm) and PMPC (26 or 28 mm)] and PMPC-grafted HXLPE liner against 32-mm femoral heads (n = 64) [PMPC (32 mm)]. The clinical outcomes improved at 3 years postoperatively for the groups. No periprosthetic osteolysis or acetabular component migration was detected, and no revision surgery was performed among the groups. The steady-state wear rate of the PMPC (26 or 28 mm) group (0.021 mm/year) was lower than that of the control (26 or 28 mm) group (− 0.015 mm/year); the steady-state wear was under the clinical threshold. In contrast, the steady-state wear rate of the PMPC (32 mm) group (-0.006 mm/year) showed no significant difference when compared to that of the PMPC (26 or 28 mm) group (p < 0.01). The results obtained in the present study clearly demonstrate that PMPC-grafting onto an HXLPE surface improved the wear resistance of acetabular liners, even when coupled with larger femoral heads. Although further follow-up evaluations are required, PMPC-grafted HXLPE acetabular liners may be a promising approach to extend the longevity of artificial joints.

Posterior approach, fracture diagnosis, and american society of anesthesiology class iii-iv are associated with increased risk of revision for dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: An analysis of 33,337 operations from the finnish arthroplasty register.

Background and objective:Dislocation is one of the most common reasons for revision surgery after primary total hip arthroplasty. Both patient related and surgical factors may influence the risk of dislocation. In this study, we evaluated risk factors for dislocation revision after total hip arthroplasty based on revised data contents of the Finnish Arthroplasty Register.Methods:We analyzed 33,337 primary total hip arthroplasties performed between May 2014 and January 2018 in Finland. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals for first dislocation revision using 18 potential risk factors as covariates, such as age, sex, diagnosis, hospital volume, surgical approach, head size, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiology class, and fixation method.Results:During the study period, there were 264 first-time revisions for dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty. The hazard ratio for dislocation revision was 3.1 (confidence interval 1.7–5.5) for posterior compared to anterolateral approach, 3.0 (confidence interval 1.9–4.7) for total hip arthroplasties performed for femoral neck fracture compared to total hip arthroplasties performed for osteoarthritis, 2.0 (confidence interval 1.0–3.9) for American Society of Anesthesiology class III–IV compared to American Society of Anesthesiology class I, and 0.5 (0.4–0.7) for 36-mm femoral head size compared to 32-mm head size.Conclusions:Special attention should be paid to patients with fracture diagnoses and American Society of Anesthesiology class III–IV. Anterolateral approach and 36-mm femoral heads decrease dislocation revision risk and should be considered for high-risk patients.

Highly Porous Tantalum Acetabular Components Without Ancillary Screws Have Similar Migration to Porous Titanium Acetabular Components With Screws at 2 Years: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BackgroundIt is proposed that highly porous coatings on acetabular components, such as a porous tantalum coating, provide adequate fixation without ancillary screw fixation in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, tantalum acetabular components have been associated with higher rates of revision than other uncemented components in national registries. The aim of this randomized controlled trial is to determine whether the early migration of a solid-backed tantalum acetabular component was no greater than that of a titanium acetabular component with ancillary screw fixation that has proven good clinical results. MethodsSixty-six patients aged 40 to 64 years, with osteoarthritis and Charnley grade A or B activity grade and who underwent primary THA, were recruited into the trial. Patients were randomized intraoperatively to receive either the tantalum or titanium acetabular component. All patients received the same cemented polished tapered femoral stem, 28-mm cobalt-chromium femoral head, and highly cross-linked polyethylene liner. Acetabular component migration was measured using radiostereometric analysis at 4-6 days postoperatively and at 6 weeks, 3 months, 1 and 2 years following THA. ResultsThe mean proximal migration at 2 years for the tantalum cohort was 0.17 mm (95% confidence interval, 0.09-0.24) which was no greater than that of the titanium cohort which was 0.19 mm (0.07-0.32). Harris hip scores and functional activity scores were similar between groups. ConclusionThese results demonstrate that early stability can be achieved without ancillary screw fixation through the use of a highly porous high friction coating on a solid-backed modular acetabular component. Level of EvidenceLevel I.