12-month Overall Survival Rates Research Articles

Tremelimumab and durvalumab as neoadjuvant or non-operative management strategy of patients with microsatellite instability-high resectable gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: the INFINITY study by GONO

BackgroundIn resectable gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GAC/GEJAC), microsatellite instability (MSI-H) confers improved survival, but limited benefit from chemotherapy. Immunotherapy may eliminate the need of chemotherapy or surgery. Patients and methodsINFINITY is a multicentre, multicohort phase II trial (NCT04817826) investigating in Cohort 1 the activity and safety of tremelimumab+durvalumab (T300/D) as neoadjuvant treatment for dMMR/MSI-H, resectable GAC/GEJAC. Primary endpoint was pathologic complete response (pCR) rate; Secondary endpoints: progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), quality of life (QoL), and translational analyses. In Cohort 2, the activity and safety of T300/D was explored as definitive treatment in patients achieving clinical complete response (cCR). Primary endpoint was 2-year cCR rate, Secondary endpoints: PFS, OS, QoL, gastrectomy-free survival (GFS) and translational analyses. ResultsIn Cohort 1, 18 patients were recruited and 15 evaluable. pCR and major-complete pathological response were 60% and 80%. Since pCR rate in T4 tumors was 17%, this subgroup of patients was excluded from enrollment in Cohort 2. At 28.1 months median follow-up, 24-month GC-specific PFS and OS rates were 85% and 92%. In Cohort 2, 18 patients were enrolled and 17 evaluable, 13 had cCR and started non-operative management (NOM). At 11.5 months median follow up, 1 patient had local regrowth and underwent salvage surgery, 12-month GFS was 64.2%. ConclusionsThe INFINITY study provided promising activity results of a chemo-free T300/D combination regimen as pre-operative treatment in dMMR/MSI GAC/GEJAC and the first available feasibility results of a NOM strategy in this disease setting, worth of further validation in larger cohorts.

Spatial interactions of immune cells as potential predictors to efficacy of toripalimab plus chemotherapy in locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a phase Ib/II trial

Advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a dismal prognosis. Immunotherapy alone offers limited efficacy, but it is still unknown whether its combination with chemotherapy could offer synergistic anti-tumor effects. This phase Ib/II study evaluated the safety and efficacy of combining toripalimab with the gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) regimen as first-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic PDAC and explored predictive biomarkers (ChiCTR2000032293). The primary endpoints were safety and overall survival (OS). The secondary outcomes were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and progression-free survival (PFS). Immune-related biomarkers including programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, genetic status, cytokine levels, and spatial features of the tumor immune microenviroment (TIME) were investigated. Neither serious treatment-related adverse events nor grade 4 immune-related adverse events were reported. Among the 72 patients, the median OS was 8.9 months, 12-month OS rate was 31.9%, with median PFS of 5.6 months, ORR of 33.3%, and DCR of 90.3%. Higher PD-L1 expression, without liver metastases were associated with higher ORR, however these factors could not effectively distinguish responders and non-responders. Importantly, dendritic cells - T helper cells - cytotoxic T lymphocytes (DC-Th-CTL) enriched immune niche and their spatial interactions were dominant predictors of response based on TIME analysis using a cyclic multiplex tissue staining assay, with an area under the curve value of 0.8. Overall, GnP plus toripalimab exhibited good safety and differentiated efficacy in selected population, and the spatial interactions of DC-Th-CTL represent promising predictors to efficacy of immunochemotherapy in locally advanced or metastatic PDAC.

Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation - A systematic review and meta-analysis of the prospective clinical studies

Abstract Background Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) is increasingly being evaluated in prospective studies as a new promising treatment option for patients with therapy-refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT). In STAR, the VT substrate is noninvasively treated with a high dose of radiotherapy. Recently, several single-arm prospective studies evaluating the clinical outcomes of STAR were published. Considering that the evidence base consists mainly of retrospective case series, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to synthesize the prospective data on outcomes of STAR. Purpose To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies evaluating clinical outcomes of STAR for VT. Methods This study was registered in PROSPERO and adhered to the PRISMA reporting guidelines. Full-text studies describing prospective studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of STAR for VT were included in this study. Records published until August 2023 were retrieved from OVID MEDLINE, OVID Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar search engine (top 200 hits), deduplicated, and screened for eligibility. Abstract screening, full-text screening, data extraction and quality assessment were performed by two reviewers independently. Endpoints were defined as treatment related CTCAE grade ≥3 adverse events within 90 days after treatment, overall survival (OS), time to VT recurrence, and recurrence-free survival. Rates of patients achieving pre-defined 50%, 75% and 95% VT burden reduction thresholds were summarised. Random-effects generalized linear mixed-effects models and inverse variance models were used for the meta-analysis. Results 1861 records were identified, 987 were screened, and 10 full-text manuscripts published between 2019 and 2023 describing the results of STAR in 82 patients were included in this study. The majority were male (n=72; 88%), between 45 and 85 years old, and suffered from ischaemic cardiomyopathy (n=51; 62%). Median left ventricular ejection fraction ranged from 21 to 38% between studies. 20 patients did not undergo a prior catheter ablation for VT. All patients were treated with a single dose of 25 Gy and median planned target volume ranged from 45 to 198 cc between studies. Pooled 12-month OS rate was 0.73, and the proportion of patients experiencing grade ≥3 adverse events within 90 days after STAR was 0.11 (Figure 1). Reduction in VT burden is shown in Table 1. Although these were not pooled because of large heterogeneity in VT reduction time frame definitions, it can be appreciated that most of the patients experienced a reduction in VT burden. Conclusion The increasing evidence from prospective studies on STAR shows acceptable 12-month OS in a population of patients with advanced heart failure and refractory VT. Moreover, there is a modest rate of high-grade adverse events and most patients experience a reduction in VT burden.

Stereotactic Radiotherapy Plus Nivolumab in Patients with Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: Results from Phase 1/2 Clinical CA209-9KH Trial.

The dismal prognosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) highlights the urgent need for novel therapeutic strategies. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) seem to be ineffective in most PDAC studies. Therefore, we conducted an open-label, multicenter phase 1/2 study (CA209-9KH) to evaluate the safety of stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) and sequential ICI therapy in PDAC, as well as to validate the efficacy of this regimen as a potential activator of antitumor immunity. Patients aged ≥ 18years with unresectable non-metastatic PDAC following four FOLFIRINOX induction cycles were included. Treatment comprised SRT (4 × 8Gy) and sequential nivolumab administration until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoints were safety and toxicity assessment. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), biomarker evaluation, and quality of life (QoL) analysis. Twenty-two patients were screened, with 15 enrolled. Eleven (median) nivolumab cycles were administered. SRT demonstrated low and clinically nonsignificant toxicity, whereas nivolumab toxicity aligned with prior safety profiles, without grade 4-5 events observed. Three patients discontinued therapy owing to toxicity. Median PFS and OS were 8.1 and 13.0months, respectively, with 12-month PFS and OS rates of 0% and 66.7%, respectively, and a 24-month OS rate of 8.9%. Biomarker levels correlated with clinical or radiological disease control. Patient-reported QoL remained acceptable, deteriorating with disease progression. SRT and nivolumab therapy exhibited manageable toxicity profiles consistent with previous findings; however, long-term treatment responses were not achieved with this regimen in locally advanced PDAC. Another strategy to trigger antitumor immunity in PDAC needs to be sought. EudraCT: 2017-003404-52; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04098432.

DKN-01 in Combination With Tislelizumab and Chemotherapy as First-Line Therapy in Advanced Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma: DisTinGuish.

The outcomes of anti-PD-1 agents plus fluoropyrimidine/platinum in frontline advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas (aGEAs) remain poor. We investigated the safety, tolerability, and activity of fluoropyrimidine/oxaliplatin and tislelizumab with the DKK1-neutralizing antibody DKN-01 in aGEAs in a phase IIa open-label study. Patients had untreated human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative aGEAs, RECIST v1.1 measurable disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-1, and adequate organ function. Patients received intravenous DKN-01 300 mg once every 2 weeks, tislelizumab 200 mg once every 3 weeks, oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 once every 3 weeks, and capecitabine 1,000 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1-15 of each 21-day cycle. The primary end point was safety and tolerability. Key secondary end points included objective response rate (ORR) by RECISTv1.1, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Between September 18, 2020, and April 8, 2021, 25 patients were enrolled. All patients who received at least one dose of DKN-01 were included in the safety analysis. Most patients had gastroesophageal junction tumors, median age was 61 years, 76% were male, and 55% were ECOG of 0. All patients reported at least one treatment-emergent adverse event. The ORR was 73% (95% CI, 49.8 to 89.3), with a disease control rate of 95%. The ORR was 90% (95% CI, 55.5 to 99.7) in the DKK1-high tumor patients and 67% (95% CI, 29.9 to 92.5) in the DKK1-low tumor patients. The median PFS was 11.3 months (95% CI, 5.8 to 12.0) and the 12-month PFS rate was 33%. The median OS was 19.5 months (95% CI, 15.2 to 24.4) with a 12-month OS rate of 76% and an 18-month OS rate of 55%. DKN-01 can be safely combined with frontline fluoropyrimidine/oxaliplatin and tislelizumab and demonstrates encouraging activity independent of PD-L1 expression levels. A randomized phase II trial is ongoing (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04363801).

Pembrolizumab for the First-Line Treatment of Recurrent Locally Advanced or Metastatic Merkel Cell Carcinoma: Results from the Single-Arm, Open-Label, Phase III KEYNOTE-913 Study.

The phase III KEYNOTE-913 study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab as first-line therapy in patients with advanced Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC). The aim was to report results from the primary analysis of KEYNOTE-913. Patients with recurrent locally advanced or metastatic MCC received pembrolizumab 200mg intravenously every 3weeks for up to 35 treatments (~2 years). The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) by blinded independent central review (BICR). Secondary end points were duration of response (DOR) and progression-free survival (PFS) per RECIST v1.1 by BICR, overall survival (OS), and safety and tolerability. Fifty-five patients were treated with pembrolizumab. The median time from first dose to data cutoff (February 15, 2024) was 50.3 months (range 38.7-59.4). The ORR was 49% (95% confidence interval [CI] 35-63), with 12 complete responses and 15 partial responses. The median DOR was 39.8 months (range 4.8-52.5+), and the 24-month DOR rate was 69%. The median PFS was 9.3 months (95% CI 3-26), and the 24-month PFS rate was 39%. The median OS was 24.3 months (95% CI 12.4 to not reached), and the 24-month OS rate was 51%. Any-grade treatment-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 38 patients (69%); 13 patients (24%) experienced grade 3-5 AEs. The most common treatment-related AEs were fatigue (n = 12 [22%]), pruritus (n = 12 [22%]), and lipase increase (n = 10 [18%]). One patient died of treatment-related Guillain-Barré syndrome. Pembrolizumab provided durable antitumor activity and promising survival and had a manageable safety profile in patients with recurrent locally advanced or metastatic MCC, supporting its use in this population. Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03783078.

Surufatinib plus toripalimab combined with etoposide and cisplatin as first-line treatment in advanced small-cell lung cancer patients: a phase Ib/II trial

There is still room for improvement in first-line treatment of advanced small cell lung cancer (SCLC). This trial firstly investigated efficacy and safety of antiangiogenic therapy (surufatinib) (200 mg, qd, po) plus anti-PD-1 treatment (toripalimab) (240 mg, d1, ivdrip) combined with etoposide (100 mg/m², d1-d3, iv, drip) and cisplatin (25 mg/m², d1-d3, ivdrip) for advanced SCLC as first-line treatment, which has been registered on ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier NCT04996771. The four-drug regimen was conducted q3w for 4 cycles with maintenance therapy of surufatinib and toripalimab. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary end points included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS) and safety. All of the 38 patients were enrolled for safety analysis, while only 35 patients were enrolled for efficacy analysis since loss of efficacy evaluation in 3 cases after treatment. After a median follow-up of 21.3 months, the ORR was 97.1% (34/35), and the DCR and the tumor shrinkage rate were both 100% (35/35). The median PFS was 6.9 months (95% CI: 4.6 m–9.2 m) and the median OS was 21.1 months (95% CI: 12.1 m–30.1 m). The 12-month, 18-month, and 24-month OS rates were 66.94%, 51.39% and 38.54%. The occurrence rate of grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was 63.2% (24/38), including neutrophil count decreased (31.6%, 12/38), white blood cell count decreased (23.7%, 9/38) and platelet count decreased (10.5%, 4/38). No unexpected adverse events occurred. This novel four-drug regimen (surufatinib, toripalimab, etoposide plus cisplatin) revealed impressive therapeutic efficacy and tolerable toxicities.

Epcoritamab in relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma: 2-year follow-up from the pivotal EPCORE NHL-1 trial

Primary results (median follow-up, 10.7 months) from the pivotal EPCORE® NHL-1 study in relapsed or refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) demonstrated deep, durable responses with epcoritamab, a CD3xCD20 bispecific antibody, when used as monotherapy. We report long-term efficacy and safety results in patients with LBCL (N = 157; 25.1-month median follow-up). As of April 21, 2023, overall response rate was 63.1% and complete response (CR) rate was 40.1%. Estimated 24-month progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 27.8% and 44.6%, respectively. An estimated 64.2% of complete responders remained in CR at 24 months. Estimated 24-month PFS and OS rates among complete responders were 65.1% and 78.2%, respectively. Of 119 minimal residual disease (MRD)-evaluable patients, 45.4% had MRD negativity, which correlated with longer PFS and OS. CR rates were generally consistent across predefined subgroups: 36% prior chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, 32% primary refractory disease, and 37% International Prognostic Index ≥3. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were cytokine release syndrome (51.0%), pyrexia (24.8%), fatigue (24.2%), and neutropenia (23.6%). These results underscore the long-term benefit of epcoritamab for treating R/R LBCL with deep responses across subgroups, including patients with hard-to-treat disease and expected poor prognosis (ClinicalTrials.gov Registration: NCT03625037).

Stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with spinal metastases from prostate cancer.

Spinal metastases may result in intractable pain, neurological deficit, and vertebral body collapse. There are only a few studies describing outcomes following spine stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) specifically for prostate cancer metastases. A prospectively collected database of patients with prostate cancer spinal metastases treated at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center from 2003 to 2023 was analyzed. The primary outcome was local control (LC). Secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS), pain resolution, and adverse radiation effects (AREs). Thirty-seven patients and 51 lesions were identified. Fifteen lesions (29%) were previously resected and 34 lesions (67%) were previously irradiated. The median tumor volume was 37.0cc (range: 2.9-263.3). A majority of lesions (71%) were treated in a single fraction (median 20Gy, range: 14-22.5); multi-fractionated treatment consisted of 21-30Gy in 2-5 fractions. Median follow-up was 12 months (range: 1-146). The 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year LC rates were 97%, 91%, and 91%, respectively. No tested prognostic factors were associated with LC, including hormone sensitivity. The 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year OS rates were 71%, 56%, and 32%; age > 70 years (p = 0.048) and tumor volume > 30cc (p = 0.03) were associated with inferior rates of OS. Complete or partial pain response was observed in 58% of patients. There were 8 instances (16%) of AREs, 2 of which were vertebral compression fractures (4%). Radiosurgery as a primary or adjuvant treatment modality for prostate cancer spinal metastases confers durable LC and moderate pain relief with minimal toxicity. Further studies are warranted to optimize management in this patient population.

Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Combined Lenvatinib and PD-1 Inhibitor Showed Improved Survival for Infiltrative Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multicenter Cohort Study.

Lenvatinib and programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitor on infiltrative hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have obtained demonstrated efficacy and still need improvement. Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) has shown promising results for advanced HCC. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of HAIC combined Lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitor versus Lenvatinib combined PD-1 inhibitor for infiltrative HCC. A total of 232 patients were enrolled. There were 114 patients received Lenvatinib combined PD-1 inhibitor (Len+PD-1 group) and 118 patients received HAIC combined Lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitor (HAIC+Len+PD-1 group). Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and safety of patients were compared between the two groups by propensity score-matching (PSM). The 6-, 12-, and 24-month OS rates were 93.8%, 65.1% and 13.4% in Len+PD-1 group, and 100%, 77.3% and 32.1% in HAIC+Len+PD-1 group, respectively. The 3-, 6-, and 12-month PFS rates were 86.4%, 45.7% and 14.1% in Len+PD-1 group, and 95.1%, 59.3% and 25.9% in HAIC+Len+PD-1 group, respectively. The HAIC+Len+PD-1 group had obviously better survival than the Len+PD-1 group both in OS (P=0.002) and PFS (P=0.004). Subgroup analysis revealed that OS in patients with metastasis was improved with HAIC+Len+PD-1 treatment. Patients with alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) response after treatment showed better survival than the non-response. In addition, HAIC+Len+PD-1 group showed manageable adverse events (AEs). Patient with infiltrative HCC, HAIC+Len+PD-1 treatment had longer OS and PFS than Len+PD-1 treatment. Early AFP response was an effective indicator of better survival and tumor response to therapy.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors for patients with mismatch-repair deficient or microsatellite instability-high advanced cancers: a meta-analysis of phase I-III clinical trials.

Mismatch-repair deficient (dMMR) and microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) cancers are associated with an increased number of somatic mutations, which can render tumors more susceptible to immune checkpoint blockade. However, a comprehensive evaluation of the efficacy profile of immune checkpoint inhibitors in this patient population across multiple cancer types is lacking. This study aims to address this knowledge gap by synthesizing data from Phase I-III clinical trials. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Google Scholar from inception until June, 2024. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomized comparative studies, and single-arm trials investigating immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with dMMR/MSI-H advanced cancers. The primary outcome was objective response rate (ORR), and the secondary outcomes included disease control rate (DCR), 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates. Subgroup analyses were conducted for the primary outcome stratified by major study characteristics. Of the 10802 identified studies, 19 trials in 25 studies totaling 2052 participants met the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled ORR was 41.7% (95% CI, 35.7%-47.7%). The pooled DCR was 68.9% (95% CI, 62.2%-75.7%). The pooled 12-month, 24-month and 36-month OS rates were 29.1% (95% CI, 19.9%-38.3%), 35.8% (95% CI, 23.6%-48.0%), and 35.8% (95% CI, 23.6%-48.0%), respectively. The pooled 12-month, 24-month and 36-month PFS rates were 46.4% (95% CI, 39.1%-53.8%), 67.0% (95% CI, 55.2%-78.8%), and 63.1% (95% CI, 37.3%-88.9%), respectively. The study establishes the therapeutic potential of immune checkpoint inhibitors in dMMR/MSI-H advanced cancers, highlighting the importance of MSI status in this context. Further head-to-head comparisons are needed to conclusively determine MSI's predictive power relative to proficient mismatch-repair/ microsatellite stable (pMMR/MSS) tumors.

Phase Ib trial of durvalumab plus tremelimumab in combination with particle therapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with macrovascular invasion: DEPARTURE trial.

34 Background: The HIMALAYA trial established the combination of durvalumab and tremelimumab (STRIDE) as first-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Carbon ion radiotherapy (C-ion RT) allows precise tumor targeting while sparing nearby normal tissue. Our strategy used C-ion RT to target a key tumor with macrovascular invasion (MVI) for disease management and potential MVI control, complemented by STRIDE. Recognising that C-ion RT stimulates immune responses, we posited that merging C-ion RT with STRIDE might enhance therapeutic effects. We present updated data of additional follow-up. Methods: This is a Phase Ib, multicenter study evaluating durvalumab with particle beam radiotherapy in HCC patients with MVI (Cohort A) and STRIDE (Cohort B). Both cohorts began with patients resistant to standard treatments. After safety confirmation, the study expanded to include therapy-naïve patients, totaling 15. C-ion RT begins after day 8 of the first cycle, following the initial drug dose. The relative biological effectiveness weighted dose is set at 60 Gy in four fractions over one week, targeting one representative intrahepatic nodule with MVI. The primary endpoint is adverse event rates, including dose limiting toxicity (DLT), with secondary endpoints on progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) (jRCT2031210046). This analysis of OS was conducted from the additional follow-up data from the primary analysis. Results: From July 2021 to January 2023, 15 advanced HCC patients were enrolled in our study (Cohort A: 3, Cohort B: 12). Four in Cohort B were systemic therapy-naïve. All cases confirmed MVI radiologically; with tumor invasion observed in the main portal vein for 4 patients and in the inferior vena cava for one. DLT evaluations in 3 from each cohort showed no incidents. While Cohort A had no adverse events, 4 patients in Cohort B (26.7%) experienced serious treatment-related adverse events. The median PFS was a significant 4.67 months (95%CI, 1.35–6.64). At the clinical cut-off date of March 31, 2024, 10 OS events were observed. The median OS was 10.4 months (95% CI, 5.6–15.2), and the 6- and 12-month OS rates were 66.7% and 46.7%, respectively. Conclusions: The safety of STRIDE in combination with particle therapy has been confirmed in advanced HCC with MVI. This combination, especially the irradiation of tumors with MVI using C-ion RT, holds promise in managing prognostic determinant tumors and potentially enhancing OS. Clinical trial information: jRCT2031210046 .

Nivolumab plus platinum-doublet chemotherapy in treatment-naive patients with advanced grade 3 Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of gastroenteropancreatic or unknown origin: The multicenter phase 2 NICE-NEC trial (GETNE-T1913)

The prognosis of patients with advanced high-grade (G3) digestive neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) is rather poor. The addition of immune checkpoint inhibition to platinum-based chemotherapy may improve survival. NICE-NEC (NCT03980925) is a single-arm, phase II trial that recruited chemotherapy-naive, unresectable advanced or metastatic G3 NENs of gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) or unknown origin. Patients received nivolumab 360 mg intravenously (iv) on day 1, carboplatin AUC 5 iv on day 1, and etoposide 100 mg/m2/d iv on days 1–3, every 3 weeks for up to six cycles, followed by nivolumab 480 mg every 4 weeks for up to 24 months, disease progression, death or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was the 12-month overall survival (OS) rate (H0 50%, H1 72%, β 80%, α 5%). Secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety. From 2019 to 2021, 37 patients were enrolled. The most common primary sites were the pancreas (37.8%), stomach (16.2%) and colon (10.8%). Twenty-five patients (67.6%) were poorly differentiated carcinomas (NECs) and/or had a Ki67 index >55%. The ORR was 56.8%. Median PFS was 5.7 months (95%CI: 5.1-9) and median OS 13.9 months (95%CI: 8.3-Not reached), with a 12-month OS rate of 54.1% (95%CI: 40.2-72.8) that did not meet the primary endpoint. However, 37.6% of patients were long-term survivors (>2 years). The safety profile was consistent with previous reports. There was one treatment-related death. Nivolumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy was associated with prolonged survival in over one-third of chemonaïve patients with G3 GEP-NENs, with a manageable safety profile.

20 Evaluating intermediate endpoints for overall survival in metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: an IMDC study

Abstract Background In Phase 3 trials, the assessment for primary endpoint of overall survival (OS) necessitates extended follow-up periods, a larger pool of events, and higher associated costs. Hence, we sought to determine whether shorter intermediate (IEs) such as Objective Response (OR), Time to Treatment Failure (TTF) and Time to Next Therapy (TTNT) are associated with OS in patients receiving immune checkpoint (ICI)-based therapy. Methods We included all International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC) patients who received contemporary first line(1L) ICI from 2013 to 2023. IEs were defined from ICI start until drug cessation or death for TTF, and initiation of next line or death for TTNT, or censored at date of last follow-up. OR included investigators-assessed complete or partial response per RECIST1.1 criteria. First, we assessed the endpoint correlations across all follow-up times of individual patient data using Kendall’s Tau (KT) correlation by a Clayton copula. A KT >0.49 indicates a strong correlation (Wicklin R., 2023). Then we evaluated associations of OS with TTF and TTNT status at the 6-month landmark using Cox regression adjusting for IMDC risk groups, metastatic sites, histology, age, and prior nephrectomy, stratified by ICI type and years of ICI start. The KT correlation was estimated by the R GJRM package (https://www.r-project.org/). All other statistical analyses were done with SAS 9.4 software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Results The cohort consisted of 1667 patients with a median follow-up of 15.4 months (IQR: 7.1-28.6). For the 6-month landmark analysis in OS, patients who died or had less than 6 months of follow-up were excluded, affecting 278 for OR, 373 for TTF, and 380 for TTNT. Median age at 1L start was 63 years (IQR: 56-70), with 73% being male and 65% undergoing nephrectomy before starting 1L. A total of 1132 patients received dual ICI, while 535 received an ICI+TKI combination. Over the entire follow-up of individual patient data, the Kendall’s Tau correlation was 0.49 (95%CI: 0.45-0.52) for TTF with OS and 0.67 (95%CI: 0.64-0.69) for TTNT with OS. The Kendall’s Tau correlations between endpoints were also similar in subgroup analyses by IMDC risk group and type of regimen and the strongest in the ICI+TKI subgroup with a Kendall’s Tau correlation of 0.73(0.66-0.78). On the 6-month OS landmark analysis (Table), patients who discontinued their 1L regimen had poor OS (adjusted HR: 2.77 (95%CI: 2.16-3.55)). Additionally, those who transitioned to a 2L therapy within the first 6 months showed worse OS, reflected by an HR of 2.82 (2.22-3.59). Patients who did not have an objective response also had worse OS (adjusted HR: 2.74 (95%CI: 2.15-3.49)). On the other hand, patients with an objective response had an 18-month OS rate (equivalent of 12-month OS post the 6-month landmark) of 91% (95%CI: 88%-93%) vs 74% (95%CI: 70%-78%) for those with no response at 6 months. Table. Landmark analysis of OS from 6 months of post therapy initiation, according to OR, TTF and TTNT event status at 6 months, in whole cohort and by IMDC and treatment groups. Conclusions Our study explored TTF, TTNT and OR as clinical IEs for OS. TTNT demonstrated the strongest association with OS, particularly in the ICI+TKI subgroup, making it a potentially clinically meaningful intermediate endpoint for evaluating treatment efficacy in ICI-based regimens.

Digital subtraction angiography-guided pancreatic arterial infusion of GEMOX chemotherapy in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a phase II, open-label, randomized controlled trial comparing with intravenous chemotherapy

BackgroundAdvanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma lacks effective treatment options, and systemic gemcitabine-based chemotherapy offers only marginal survival benefits at the cost of significant toxicities and adverse events. New therapeutic options with better drug availability are warranted. This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of digital subtraction angiography (DSA)-guided pancreatic arterial infusion (PAI) versus intravenous chemotherapy (IVC) using the gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) regimen in unresectable locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer (PC) patients.Materials and methodsThis study prospectively enrolled 51 eligible treatment-naive patients with unresectable PC to receive GEMOX treatment via PAI or IVC (1:1 ratio randomization) from December 2015 to December 2019. Cycles were repeated monthly, and each process consisted of two treatments administered bi-weekly. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), 1-year survival, 6-month survival, tumor-site subgroup survival, and incidences of adverse events were compared.ResultsThe median OS of the PAI and IVC groups were 9.93 months and 10.07 months, respectively (p = 0.3049). The median PFS of the PAI and IVC groups were 5.07 months and 4.23 months (p = 0.1088). No significant differences were found in the ORR (11.54% vs. 4%, p = 0.6312), DCR (53.85% vs. 44%, p = 0.482), and 1-year OS rate (44% vs. 20.92%, p = 0.27) in PAI and IVC groups. The 6-month OS rate was significantly higher in the PAI group (100%) than in the IVC group (83.67%) (p = 0.0173). The median OS of patients in PAI group with pancreatic head and neck tumors were significantly higher than those of body and tail tumors (12.867 months vs. 9 months, p = 0.0214). The incidences of hematologic disorders, liver function disorders, and digestive disorders in the IVC group were higher than in the PAI group (p < 0.05).ConclusionGEMOX PAI therapy presented a higher 6-month OS rate and fewer adverse events than IVC in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients. Those with pancreatic head and neck tumors may yield a superior treatment outcome from PAI treatment.Trial registration numberNCT02635971.Date of registration21/12/2015.

Outcomes of Resectable Gallbladder Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis From a Tertiary Care Centre in India.

Background Gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) has deleterious outcomes, but due to its reduced incidence in Western countries, there is a paucity of data on this disease. Here we report the outcomes of a retrospective analysis of resectable gallbladder cancer from a tertiary cancer centre in eastern India. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) rates among patients with resectable GBC. Methods A retrospective analysis was carried out on patients who underwent radical surgery between 2007 and 2022 and received various neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy methods. Patients who had adjuvant chemoradiotherapy concurrently or who did not receive adjuvant therapy were excluded. All the baseline clinicopathological characteristics were retrieved from electronic medical records. The survival data were collected from records of follow-up visits as well as telephonic calls to the patients who were lost to follow-up. Simple proportions were used for baseline characteristics, and the Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis. Results A total of 161 patients were identified, and data were captured from electronic medical records. The included patients' ages ranged between 26 and 80 years, with a median age of 56 years. Among the participants, 103 were female (64%) and 58 (36%) were male. Among the 161 patients, the median number of lymph nodes harvested was nine (ranging from one to 43), and only three patients were margin-positive. The tumour, nodes, and metastasis (TNM) distributions were as follows: pT2 in 111 patients (70.25%), pT3 in 44 patients (27.85%), and pT4 in three patients (1.90%). The nodal statuses were pN0 in 91 patients (61.9%), pN1 in 51 patients (34.69%), and pN2 in five patients (3.4%). The majority (64%) received single-agent capecitabine, 27% received gemcitabine-based platinum doublet therapy, and 4.3% received neoadjuvant therapy. Of the full sample, 2.4% received concurrent adjuvant chemo plus radiation therapy, and three patients did not receive any adjuvant therapy. Additionally, among the 161 patients, 34.16% had a relapse, with 47% being local and 52% being distant relapses. The median follow-up was 49 months (interquartile range (IQR) 23-71 months). The 24-month RFS rate was 67.1% (SD+/- 4.3%), and the 24-month OS rate was 78.1% (SD+/- 4.1%). Conclusion Our data, which is from one of the largest samples from India, show that resectable gallbladder cancer has very good outcomes after radical surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. There was a higher proportion of T2 and node-negative disease, which could have led to better survival compared to published literature.

Vedolizumab plus basiliximab as second-line therapy for steroid-refractory lower gastrointestinal acute graft-versus-host disease.

Steroid-resistant (SR) lower gastrointestinal (LGI) tract graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is the predominant cause of morbidity and mortality from GVHD after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). The role of vedolizumab in the treatment of SR-LGI acute GVHD (aGVHD) remains uncertain. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of vedolizumab combined with basiliximab as second-line therapy for SR-LGI-aGVHD. This study aimed to explore the efficacy of vedolizumab combined with basiliximab for SR-LGI-aGVHD. The primary endpoint was the overall response (OR) on day 28. Secondary and safety endpoints included durable OR at day 56, overall survival (OS), chronic GVHD (cGVHD), non-relapse mortality (NRM), failure-free survival (FFS), and adverse events. Twenty-eight patients with SR-LGI-aGVHD were included. The median time to start of combination therapy after SR-LGI-aGVHD diagnosis was 7 (range, 4-16) days. The overall response rate (ORR) at 28 days was 75.0% (95% CI: 54.8%-88.6%), and 18 achieved a complete response (CR) (64.3%, 95% CI: 44.1%-80.7%). The durable OR at day 56 was 64.3% (95% CI: 44.1%-80.7%). The 100-day, 6-month, and 12-month OS rates for the entire cohort of patients were 60.7% (95% CI: 45.1%-81.8%), 60.7% (95% CI: 45.1%-81.8%), and 47.6% (95% CI: 31.4%-72.1%), respectively. The median failure-free survival was 276 days; (95% CI: 50-not evaluable) 12-month NRM was 42.9% (95% CI: 24.1%-60.3%). The 1-year cumulative incidence of cGVHD was 35.7%. Within 180 days after study treatments, the most common grade 3 and 4 adverse events were infections. Nine (32.1%) patients developed cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation complicated with bacterial infections (25.0%, CMV infection; 7.1%, CMV viremia). Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) reactivation occurred in five patients (17.9%, 95% CI: 6.8%-37.6%). Only three patients (10.7%, 95% CI: 2.8%-29.4%) in our study developed pseudomembranous colitis. Vedolizumab plus basiliximab demonstrated efficacy in severe SR-LGI-aGVHD and was well-tolerated. Vedolizumab plus basiliximab may be considered a potential treatment option for patients with LGI-aGVHD.

Outcomes of venetoclax-based therapy in patients with t(11;14) light chain amyloidosis after failure of daratumumab-based therapy

Background Daratumumab’s incorporation in the upfront treatment of light chain (AL) amyloidosis has led to daratumumab (dara) refractoriness early in disease course. Patients who experience relapse or have suboptimal response to dara-based-therapy, have limited options. Objective This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of venetoclax-based therapy in t(11;14) positive AL patients who previously failed dara. Methods Thirty-one patients with AL were included in this bi-institutional retrospective analysis. Results Dara failure was due to inadequate response in 20 (65%) patients, haematologic relapse in 7 (22%), and both haematologic plus organ relapse in 4 (13%). Overall haematologic response rate to venetoclax-based therapy was 97%, with ≥ VGPR being 91%. Of the 19 evaluable patients with cardiac involvement, 14 (74%) achieved organ response. Of the 13 evaluable patients with renal involvement, 6 (46%) achieved organ response. With a median follow-up of 22 months, median time-to-next-treatment (TTNT) and overall survival (OS) were not reached. The 12- and 24-month TTNT rates were 74% and 56%, respectively. At data-cut-off, four patients had died, all from AL-related organ complications. The 12- and 24-month OS rates were 89% and 85%, respectively. Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 26% of patients, with 6% due to infections. Conclusion These findings are encouraging for the use of venetoclax as salvage therapy post-dara failure.

Combined radiation and chemotherapy versus monotherapy for anaplastic thyroid cancer: A SEER retrospective analysis

BackgroundThe effect of combined radiation and chemotherapy (combination therapy) versus monotherapy on anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC) has not yet been clear. MethodsWe identified 516 ATC patients during 2010–2015 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database and evaluated their survival outcome using the Kaplan-Meier method, Cox regression analysis and propensity score matching (PSM) technique. ResultsThe median overall survival (OS) among the entire cohort was 3 months (95 % confidence interval [CI], 2.58–3.42 months), and the 6- and 12-month OS rates were 29 % (95 % CI, 25.01%–32.88 %) and 13 % (95 % CI, 10.60%–16.58 %), respectively. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that ATC patients not receiving radiotherapy or chemotherapy were unquestionably associated with worse OS (hazard ratio [HR] 3.000, 95 % CI, 2.390–3.764) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) (HR = 3.107, 95 % CI, 2.388–4.043), compared with those receiving combination therapy. However, combination therapy did not predict better prognosis compared with monotherapy (all P > 0.05). After PSM, the median OS and CSS were also not significantly improved in patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy versus chemotherapy alone (OS, P = 0.382; CSS, P = 0.420) or radiotherapy alone (OS, P = 0.065; CSS, P = 0.251). ConclusionCombination therapy, compared to monotherapy, does not have the expected improvement in survival beyond the benefits achievable with each single-modality treatment, necessitating further prospective research to tailor its treatment management.

Ipilimumab and nivolumab plus UV1, an anticancer vaccination against telomerase, in advanced melanoma.

LBA9519 Background: The combination of ipilimumab (IPI) and nivolumab (NIVO) remains a standard of care for patients with advanced melanoma, especially those with poor prognostic factors, albeit with a significant risk of toxicity. Therapeutic cancer vaccines are ideally positioned to improve outcomes without significantly increasing toxicity. UV1 is a therapeutic cancer vaccine generating T-cell responses against the universal cancer antigen telomerase. In a Phase I trial in melanoma (N = 30), UV1 plus pembrolizumab demonstrated a tolerable safety profile, a complete response rate of 33%, median PFS of 18.9 months, and 2-year OS rate of 73.3%. Recently, results from a randomized Phase II trial indicated a longer overall survival and a higher response rate for previously treated patients with advanced mesothelioma receiving UV1 in combination with IPI-NIVO (1). Methods: In this Phase II, open-label, multicenter study, we randomly assigned treatment-naïve patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma (stage IIIb-IIId or IV) to IPI 3mg/kg + NIVO 1mg/kg for 4 cycles, followed by NIVO 480 mg as maintenance, with or without 8 intradermal injections of 300 µg UV1 (+GM-CSF). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR) according to RECIST 1.1. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), duration of response, and safety. Results: A total of 156 patients underwent randomization; 78 patients were assigned to the IPI-NIVO-UV1 arm and 78 patients to the IPI-NIVO arm. The median age was 60, 48% had M1C or D disease, 38% had LDH &gt;upper limit of normal, and 42% had a positive BRAF mutation status. With a minimum follow-up of 18 months, the 12-month PFS rate was 57% in both arms (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.59-1.55, p value 0.845). The ORR was similar with IPI-NIVO-UV1 compared to IPI-NIVO, at 60% vs 59%, respectively (Odds ratio 1.12, 95% CI 0.58-2.16, p value 0.867). The 12-month OS rate was 87% and 88%, respectively (HR 1.15, 95% CI 0.60-2.20, p value 0.674). The occurrence of grade &gt;3 adverse events was similar in both treatment arms. Conclusion: UV1 did not improve on outcomes of IPI-NIVO, in terms of PFS. Longer follow-up is required for the accurate assessment of OS. No significant toxicity increases were observed with the addition of UV1. Data from a biomarker driven cohort are awaited. 1. Helland et al, Eur J Cancer 2024. Clinical trial information: NCT04382664 .