24-hour Systolic Blood Pressure Research Articles

Effects of Achieving Rapid, Intensive, and Sustained Blood Pressure Reduction in Intracerebral Hemorrhage Expansion and Functional Outcome.

The time taken to achieve blood pressure (BP) control could be pivotal in the benefits of reducing BP in acute intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). We aimed to assess the relationship between the rapid achievement and sustained maintenance of an intensive systolic BP (SBP) target with radiologic, clinical, and functional outcomes. Rapid, Intensive, and Sustained BP lowering in Acute ICH (RAINS) was a multicenter, prospective, observational cohort study of adult patients with ICH <6 hours and SBP ≥150 mm Hg at 4 Comprehensive Stroke Centers during a 4.5-year period. Patients underwent baseline and 24-hour CT scans and 24-hour noninvasive BP monitoring. BP was managed under a rapid (target achievement ≤60 minutes), intensive (target SBP <140 mm Hg), and sustained (target stability for 24 hours) BP protocol. SBP target achievement ≤60 minutes and 24-hour SBP variability were recorded. Outcomes included hematoma expansion (>6 mL or >33%) at 24 hours (primary outcome), early neurologic deterioration (END, 24-hour increase in NIH Stroke Scale score ≥4), and 90-day ordinal modified Rankin scale (mRS) score. Analyses were adjusted by age, sex, anticoagulation, onset-to-imaging time, ICH volume, and intraventricular extension. We included 312 patients (mean age 70.2 ± 13.3 years, 202 [64.7%] male). Hematoma expansion occurred in 70/274 (25.6%) patients, END in 58/291 (19.9%), and the median 90-day mRS score was 4 (interquartile range, 2-5). SBP target achievement ≤60 minutes (178/312 [57.1%]) associated with a lower risk of hematoma expansion (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.23-0.77), lower END rate (aOR 0.43, 95% CI 0.23-0.80), and lower 90-day mRS scores (aOR 0.48, 95% CI 0.32-0.74). The mean 24-hour SBP variability was 21.0 ± 7.6 mm Hg. Higher 24-hour SBP variability was not related to expansion (aOR 0.99, 95% CI 0.95-1.04) but associated with higher END rate (aOR 1.15, 95% CI 1.09-1.21) and 90-day mRS scores (aOR 1.06, 95% CI 1.04-1.10). Among patients with acute ICH, achieving an intensive SBP target within 60 minutes was associated with lower hematoma expansion risk. Rapid SBP reduction and stable sustention within 24 hours were related to improved clinical and functional outcomes. These findings warrant the design of randomized clinical trials examining the impact of effectively achieving rapid, intensive, and sustained BP control on hematoma expansion. This study provides Class III evidence that in adults with spontaneous ICH and initial SBP ≥150 mm Hg, lowering SBP to <140 mm Hg within the first hour and maintaining this for 24 hours is associated with decreased hematoma expansion.

Effect of Alcohol-Mediated Renal Denervation on Blood Pressure in the Presence of Antihypertensive Medications: Primary Results from the TARGET BP I Randomized Clinical Trial.

Renal denervation (RDN) has demonstrated clinically relevant reductions in blood pressure among individuals with uncontrolled hypertension despite lifestyle intervention and medications. The safety and effectiveness of alcohol-mediated RDN has not been formally studied in this indication. TARGET BP I is a prospective, international, sham-controlled, randomized, patient- and assessor-blinded trial investigating the safety and efficacy of alcohol-mediated RDN. Patients with office systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥150 and ≤180 mmHg, office diastolic BP ≥90 mmHg and mean 24-hour ambulatory SBP ≥135 and ≤170 mmHg, despite prescription of 2-5 antihypertensive medications were enrolled. The primary endpoint was the baseline-adjusted change in mean 24-hour ambulatory systolic BP at 3 months post procedure. Secondary endpoints include mean between-group differences in office and ambulatory BP at additional time points. Among 301 patients randomized 1:1 to RDN or sham control, RDN was associated with a significant reduction in 24-hour ambulatory SBP at 3 months (mean ± standard deviation -10.0 ± 14.2 mmHg versus -6.8 ± 12.1 mmHg, treatment difference -3.2 mmHg, 95% confidence interval [CI] -6.3, 0.0 mmHg; P=0.0487). Subgroup analysis of the primary endpoint revealed no significant interaction across predefined subgroups. At 3 months, the mean change in office SBP was -12.7 ± 18.3 mmHg and -9.7 ± 17.3 mmHg (difference, -3.0, 95% CI -7.0, 1.0; P=0.173), for RDN and sham, respectively. No significant differences in ambulatory or office diastolic BP were observed. Adverse safety events through 6 months were uncommon with 1 instance of accessory renal artery dissection in the RDN group (0.7%). No significant between-group differences in medication changes or patient adherence were identified. Alcohol-mediated RDN was associated with a modest but statistically significant reduction in 24-hour ambulatory systolic BP compared with sham control. No significant differences between groups in office BP or 6-month major adverse events were observed.

Reduction in systolic blood pressure following dietary fibre intervention is dependent on baseline gut microbiota composition

Uncontrolled hypertension is a primary cause of non-communicable diseases and death globally(1). The gut microbiota plays a role in hypertension and dietary interventions high in fibre have been shown to lower blood pressure (BP)(2). Not all participants respond to dietary fibre interventions, for reasons which are unclear. Here we aimed to identify responders of a high fibre intervention based on their baseline gut microbiome. Twenty treatment-naive participants with hypertension received either placebo or 40g per day of prebiotic acetylated and butyrylated high amylose maize starch (HAMSAB) supplementation for 3 weeks in a phase II randomised cross-over double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Blood pressure was monitored at baseline and each endpoint by 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring, with those experiencing a reduction between timepoints of ≥ 2 mmHg classified as responders. Baseline stool samples were collected and the V4-V5 region of the 16S gene sequenced. Taxonomy was assigned by reference to the SILVA database. The MaAsLin2 package was used for assessing the relationship between baseline gut microbiota and response to dietary intervention. Overall participants had significant reduction in 24-hour systolic BP (–6.1 mmHg, p = 0.03), with 14 individuals classified as responders and six individuals as non-responders. 13 genera were found to be differentially abundant between responders and non-responders. Genera significantly enriched in responders included Dialister (β = 1.29, q = 1.921x10-134), Coprococcus (β = 1.26, q = 3.282x10-121), Bifidobacterium (β = 1.67, q = 1.11x10-81), Ruminococcus (β = 0.161, q = 1.11x10-8) and Roseburia (β = 0.82, q = 4.275x10-2). Participants who experienced a decrease in systolic BP following a dietary fibre intervention had increased level of bacterial genera known to contain species that produce short-chain fatty acids (e.g. Bifidobacterium, Roseburia and Ruminococcus) at baseline. These data suggest that baseline microbiota composition contributes to the response to dietary fibre intervention trials in people with hypertension.

Prognostic impact of hypertension grading

BackgroundMost Hypertension Guidelines grade hypertension according to various cut-off values. We sought to investigate the prognostic impact of Grades 1 (140–159 and/or 90–99 mmHg), 2 (160–179 and/or 100–109 mmHg) and 3 (≥180 and/or ≥110 mmHg). MethodsWe followed for an average of 10 years a cohort of 3,150 initially untreated hypertensive patients (mean age 50 years, 44 % women) with no previous cardiovascular disease at entry. All patients underwent diagnostic tests including 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring. ResultsAt entry, average clinic BP was 156/97 mmHg and average 24-hour BP was 137/87 mmHg. During follow-up, 314 patients experienced a first major cardiovascular event (composite of non-fatal myocardial infarction or stroke, cardiovascular death, or hospitalization for heart failure). Event rate was not formally dissimilar between Grade 1 and Grade 2 (0.73 vs 0.95 per 100 patient-years, respectively; p = 0.06). It was higher in Grade 3 (1.93 per 100 patient-years; p < 0.01 vs Grade 1 and Grade 2). After adjustment for a robust set of covariables, the hazard ratio was not dissimilar between Grade 1 and Grade 2 (p = 0.27), and higher in Grade 3 than in Grade 1 (p < 0.01), but the excess risk in Grade 3 was no longer significant (hazard ratio: 1.25, 95 % CI 0.87–1.78; p = 0.22) after adjustment for 24-hour ambulatory systolic BP. ConclusionsWe were unable to find a significant difference in the relative hazard of cardiovascular events tied to hypertension Grades 1 and 2. Conversely, Grade 3 (clinic BP ≥180/110 mmHg) portends a higher cardiovascular risk, which is associated with higher levels of 24-hour ambulatory BP.

Design and rationale of the Comprehensive intelligent Hypertension managEment SyStem (CHESS) evaluation study: a cluster randomized controlled trial for hypertension management in primary care

BackgroundHypertension management in China is suboptimal with high prevalence and low control rate due to various barriers, including lack of self-management awareness of patients and inadequate capacity of physicians. Digital therapeutic interventions including mobile health and computational device algorithms such as clinical decision support systems (CDSS) are scalable with the potential to improve blood pressure (BP) management and strengthen the healthcare system in resource-constrained areas, yet their effectiveness remains to be tested. The aim of this report is to describe the protocol of the Comprehensive intelligent Hypertension managEment SyStem (CHESS) evaluation study assessing the effect of a multi-faceted hypertension management system for supporting patients and physicians on BP lowering in primary care settings. Materials and MethodsThe CHESS evaluation study is a parallel-group, cluster-randomized controlled trial conducted in primary care settings in China. 41 primary care sites from 3 counties of China are randomly assigned to either the usual care or the intervention group with the implementation of the CHESS system, more than 1600 patients aged 35-80 years with uncontrolled hypertension and access to a smartphone by themselves or relatives are recruited into the study and followed up for 12 months. In the intervention group, participants receive patient-tailored reminders and alerts via messages or intelligent voice calls triggered by uploaded home blood pressure monitoring data and participants’ characteristics, while physicians receive guideline-based prescription instructions according to updated individual data from each visit, and administrators receive auto-renewed feedback of hypertension management performance from the data analysis platform. The multiple components of the CHESS system can work synergistically and have undergone rigorous development and pilot evaluation using a theory-informed approach. The primary outcome is the mean change in 24-hour ambulatory systolic BP from baseline to 12-month. DiscussionThe CHESS trial will provide evidence and novel insight into the effectiveness and feasibility of an implementation strategy using a comprehensive digital BP management system for reducing hypertension burden in primary care settings. Trial registrationhttps://www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT05605418

Dietary metabolites and blood pressure regulation in dietary feeding interventions: a systematic review

Hypertension, characterised by elevated blood pressure (BP), continues to be a major global public health problem. It is defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥140 mmHg and/or diastolic BP (DBP) ≥90 mmH(1) and is the leading risk factor for cardiovascular diseases(2). Nutritional metabolomics (Nutrimetabolomics) presents an objective approach to explore the interplay between diet and health outcomes(3). Through analysis of intermediate molecules and metabolic byproducts, metabolomic profiles can objectively reflect an individual’s dietary intake and assess variations in metabolism(3). To date, no review has been conducted that investigates the relationship between diet, metabolites and BP regulation. This systematic review aimed to identify and synthesise findings of human dietary feeding intervention studies that have examined the role of metabolites in BP regulation. A comprehensive search was conducted in November 2022 across EMBASE, Medline, CINAHL, PsychINFO, Scopus and Cochrane databases. Search terms were defined using a combination of keywords, including “metabolome”, “diet”, and “blood pressure”. All included intervention studies explored the dietary metabolome from food provision, meals or supplements to a comparator or control intervention and, examined the relationship between dietary-related metabolites and BP in humans and published in English. The initial search identified 1,109 studies, with a final six studies meeting all eligibility criteria and included in the final review. Metabolites were identified in urine (n = 4), plasma (n = 2), or faeces (n = 1). Various analytical techniques were employed, including H-NMR, LC-MS, and GC-MS, while majority of studies used untargeted metabolomics (n = 4). Among included studies, five reported a significant association between individual metabolites and BP or change in BP. These investigations emphasised dietary patterns as the primary focus of analysis. In contrast, one study revealed no relationship between the investigated metabolites and BP. However, this particular study evaluated the impact of a single food product rather than dietary patterns. In total, 39 metabolites were linked to BP, with 36 associated with SBP and 25 with DBP. Several super-pathways involved in blood pressure regulation were identified, across metabolism of amino acids, carbohydrates, cofactors, vitamins, lipids, nucleotides, peptides, and xenobiotics. Within these, 17 distinct sub-pathways were delineated. The only metabolite found to have a significant relationship with BP measures across multiple studies was N-Acetylneuraminate. In one study, it showed a relationship with DBP, while another study linked it to a decrease in both 24-hour DBP and SBP. No other metabolites were consistently replicated between studies. Nutrimetabolomics appears to be a promising field in evaluation of diet and BP reduction. However, further research is required to understand which metabolites influence BP regulation.

Serum isolevuglandin IgG antibody concentrations are increased in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and associated with lower 24-hour blood pressure

ObjectiveHypertension is frequent in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and is a major contributor to increased cardiovascular risk. Isolevuglandins (IsoLGs) are downstream products of oxidative stress that drive hypertension and SLE disease activity in animal models. Antibodies to IsoLGs (anti-IsoLGs) are present in human SLE and associated with disease activity, but it is not known if concentrations are higher compared to control subjects or if they are associated with blood pressure (BP).MethodsWe measured serum anti-IsoLG IgG antibody concentrations by sandwich ELISA in 23 patients with SLE and 30 controls who had participated in a cross-sectional 24-hour ambulatory BP study. We examined the association between anti-IsoLG IgG antibodies and BP measurements in patients with SLE and controls by Spearman Rho (rs) and linear regression analysis.ResultsSerum anti-IsoLG IgG antibody concentrations were higher in patients with SLE than controls (P = 0.007) and inversely associated with BP in SLE but not controls. In patients with SLE antibody concentrations were inversely associated with office (rs = −0.418) and diurnal systolic BP (rs = −0.421); the relationship was stronger among patients not taking anti-hypertensives (office: rs = −0.740, diurnal systolic BP: rs = −0.802) and every 20% increase in antibody concentration was associated with 10 mmHg decrease in 24-hour systolic BP (P = 0.004).ConclusionSerum anti-IsoLG IgG antibody concentrations are higher in patients with SLE than controls and are inversely associated with 24-hour BP measurements. Since IsoLGs promote hypertension, it is possible that in SLE, IsoLG antibodies could help clear these hypertension-inducing antigens.

A brief overview of modern approaches to the therapy of resistant arterial hypertension

Resistant hypertension is associated with increased mortality and morbidity. The optimal drug therapy for resistant hypertension has not been fully clarified, there are few studies on this issue in the literature. We compared the efficacy of nebivolol 5 mg, a third-generation beta-blocker, with spironolactone 25 mg in patients with resistant hypertension.&#x0D; 81 patients with resistant hypertension were included in the study. Resistant hypertension was defined as the presence of official blood pressure ≥ 140/90 mm Hg. when patients received 3 or more antihypertensive drugs, including diuretics. Blood pressure was recorded in office and outpatient settings at baseline and after 8 weeks of treatment.&#x0D; Office systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure at 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring were significantly lower compared to baseline values in the nebivolol and spironolactone groups. The decrease in 24-hour mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure in the nebivolol group was 14.9±19.8 mm Hg. Art. and 9.3±12.7 mm Hg. Art. compared to 19.5±16.4 mm Hg. Art. and 13.7±10.8 mm Hg. Art. in the spironolactone group, respectively. The reduction in 24-hour mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure was not significantly different between the nebivolol and spironolactone groups (P = 0.338 and P = 0.153).&#x0D; Therefore, nebivolol is an effective treatment option for resistant hypertension, and the antihypertensive effect of this drug is similar to low doses of spironolactone.

RNA Interference With Zilebesiran for Mild to Moderate Hypertension

Angiotensinogen is the most upstream precursor of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, a key pathway in blood pressure (BP) regulation. Zilebesiran, an investigational RNA interference therapeutic, targets hepatic angiotensinogen synthesis. To evaluate antihypertensive efficacy and safety of different zilebesiran dosing regimens. This phase 2, randomized, double-blind, dose-ranging study of zilebesiran vs placebo was performed at 78 sites across 4 countries. Screening initiation occurred in July 2021 and the last patient visit of the 6-month study occurred in June 2023. Adults with mild to moderate hypertension, defined as daytime mean ambulatory systolic BP (SBP) of 135 to 160 mm Hg following antihypertensive washout, were randomized. Randomization to 1 of 4 subcutaneous zilebesiran regimens (150, 300, or 600 mg once every 6 months or 300 mg once every 3 months) or placebo (once every 3 months) for 6 months. The primary end point was between-group difference in least-squares mean (LSM) change from baseline to month 3 in 24-hour mean ambulatory SBP. Of 394 randomized patients, 377 (302 receiving zilebesiran and 75 receiving placebo) comprised the full analysis set (93 Black patients [24.7%]; 167 [44.3%] women; mean [SD] age, 57 [11] years). At 3 months, 24-hour mean ambulatory SBP changes from baseline were -7.3 mm Hg (95% CI, -10.3 to -4.4) with zilebesiran, 150 mg, once every 6 months; -10.0 mm Hg (95% CI, -12.0 to -7.9) with zilebesiran, 300 mg, once every 3 months or every 6 months; -8.9 mm Hg (95% CI, -11.9 to -6.0) with zilebesiran, 600 mg, once every 6 months; and 6.8 mm Hg (95% CI, 3.6-9.9) with placebo. LSM differences vs placebo in change from baseline to month 3 were -14.1 mm Hg (95% CI, -19.2 to -9.0; P < .001) with zilebesiran, 150 mg, once every 6 months; -16.7 mm Hg (95% CI, -21.2 to -12.3; P < .001) with zilebesiran, 300 mg, once every 3 months or every 6 months; and -15.7 mm Hg (95% CI, -20.8 to -10.6; P < .001) with zilebesiran, 600 mg, once every 6 months. Over 6 months, 60.9% of patients receiving zilebesiran had adverse events vs 50.7% patients receiving placebo and 3.6% had serious adverse events vs 6.7% receiving placebo. Nonserious drug-related adverse events occurred in 16.9% of zilebesiran-treated patients (principally injection site reactions and mild hyperkalemia) and 8.0% of placebo-treated patients. In adults with mild to moderate hypertension, treatment with zilebesiran across a range of doses at 3-month or 6-month intervals significantly reduced 24-hour mean ambulatory SBP at month 3. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04936035.

Effect of Accessory Renal Arteries on Essential Hypertension and Related Mechanisms.

This case-control study aimed to determine whether there were differences between patients with essential hypertension with accessory renal arteries (ARAs) and those without ARAs. The enrolled patients with essential hypertension were divided into the ARA group (n=200) and control group without ARAs (n=238). After propensity matching, 394 patients (197 in each of the 2 groups), were included. The 24-hour BP (4.33/2.43 mm Hg) and daytime BP (4.48/2.61 mm Hg) of patients in the ARA group were significantly higher than those of the control group (P<0.05). The flow-mediated dilation was lower in the ARA group (5.98±2.70 versus 5.18±2.66; P<0.05). In correlation analysis, the horizontal plasma aldosterone concentration had the highest correlation with 24-hour, daytime, and nighttime systolic BP (r=0.263, 0.247, and 0.243, respectively; P<0.05) and diastolic BP (r=0.325, 0.298, and 0.317, respectively; P<0.05). As for multivariate regression analysis, plasma aldosterone concentration was a significant risk factor for elevated 24-hour, daytime, and nighttime systolic BP (β=0.249 [95% CI, 0.150-0.349], 0.228 [95% CI, 0.128-0.329], and 0.282 [95% CI, 0.187-0.377], respectively; P<0.05) and elevated diastolic BP (β=0.289 [95% CI, 0.192-0.385], 0.256 [95% CI, 0.158-0.353], and 0.335 [95% CI, 0.243-0.427], respectively; P<0.05). Direct renin concentration was also a risk factor for 24-hour and daytime BPs, whereas heart rate was a risk factor correlated with 24-hour, daytime, and nighttime diastolic BP (all P<0.05). For the mixed-effects model for repeated measures, the results were similar to results of the multivariate regression analysis (all P<0.05). ARAs could contribute a higher BP of patients with essential hypertension and might promote the development of essential hypertension. The mechanism might be related to overactivation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and sympathetic nervous system.

Effect of Tai Chi vs Aerobic Exercise on Blood Pressure in Patients With Prehypertension

Prehypertension increases the risk of developing hypertension and other cardiovascular diseases. Early and effective intervention for patients with prehypertension is highly important. To assess the efficacy of Tai Chi vs aerobic exercise in patients with prehypertension. This prospective, single-blinded randomized clinical trial was conducted between July 25, 2019, and January 24, 2022, at 2 tertiary public hospitals in China. Participants included 342 adults aged 18 to 65 years with prehypertension, defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP) of 120 to 139 mm Hg and/or diastolic BP (DBP) of 80 to 89 mm Hg. Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to a Tai Chi group (n = 173) or an aerobic exercise group (n = 169). Both groups performed four 60-minute supervised sessions per week for 12 months. The primary outcome was SBP at 12 months obtained in the office setting. Secondary outcomes included SBP at 6 months and DBP at 6 and 12 months obtained in the office setting and 24-hour ambulatory BP at 12 months. Of the 1189 patients screened, 342 (mean [SD] age, 49.3 [11.9] years; 166 men [48.5%] and 176 women [51.5%]) were randomized to 1 of 2 intervention groups: 173 to Tai Chi and 169 to aerobic exercise. At 12 months, the change in office SBP was significantly different between groups by -2.40 (95% CI, -4.39 to -0.41) mm Hg (P = .02), with a mean (SD) change of -7.01 (10.12) mm Hg in the Tai Chi group vs -4.61 (8.47) mm Hg in the aerobic exercise group. The analysis of office SBP at 6 months yielded similar results (-2.31 [95% CI, -3.94 to -0.67] mm Hg; P = .006). Additionally, 24-hour ambulatory SBP (-2.16 [95% CI, -3.84 to -0.47] mm Hg; P = .01) and nighttime ambulatory SBP (-4.08 [95% CI, -6.59 to -1.57] mm Hg; P = .002) were significantly reduced in the Tai Chi group compared with the aerobic exercise group. In this study including patients with prehypertension, a 12-month Tai Chi intervention was more effective than aerobic exercise in reducing SBP. These findings suggest that Tai Chi may help promote the prevention of cardiovascular disease in populations with prehypertension. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Identifier: ChiCTR1900024368.

Interventions aimed to increase average 24-h systolic blood pressure reduce blood pressure drops in patients with reflex syncope and orthostatic intolerance.

Systolic blood pressure (SBP) drops recorded by 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring (ABPM) identify patients with susceptibility to reflex syncope and orthostatic intolerance. We tested the hypothesis that treatments aimed to increase BP (reassurance, education, and lifestyle measures plus pharmacological strategies) can reduce SBP drops. This was a multicentre, observational proof-of-concept study performed in patients with reflex syncope and/or orthostatic intolerance and with SBP drops on a screening ABPM. Among 144 eligible patients, 111 underwent a second ABPM on average 2.5 months after start of treatment. Overall, mean 24-h SBP increased from 114.1 ± 12.1 to 121.4 ± 14.5 mmHg (P < 0.0001). The number of SBP drops <90 and <100 mmHg decreased by 61%, 46% during daytime, and by 48% and 37% during 24-h period, respectively (P < 0.0001 for all). The dose-response relationship between difference in 24-h average SBP increase and reduction in number of SBP drops reached a plateau around ∼15 mmHg increase of 24-h SBP. The reduction in SBP drop rate was consistent and significant in patients who underwent deprescription of hypotensive medications (n = 44) and in patients who received BP-rising drugs (n = 67). In patients with reflex syncope and/or orthostatic intolerance, an increase in average 24-h SBP, regardless of the implemented strategy, significantly reduced the number of SBP drops and symptom burden. A 13 mmHg increase in 24-h SBP appears to represent the optimal goal for aborting the maximal number of SBP drops, representing a possible target for future interventions. ClincalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05729724.

Feasibility of Arteriograph 24 for evaluation of 24-hour pulse wave velocity and central blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes and non-diabetic controls.

The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility of the Arteriograph 24 device to measure 24-hour PWV and central systolic blood pressure (cSBP) in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and non-diabetic controls and compare daytime and nighttime characteristics in the two groups. Twenty-four-hour PWV and cSBP was measured in 58 patients with T2DM (mean age: 66 ± 9 years, 50% women, mean duration of T2DM: 7.8 ± 1.5 years) and 62 age- and sex-matched controls. Seventy percent of participants (71% T2DM patients and 69% controls) had sufficient readings to generate an acceptable 24-hour report (≥14 day and ≥7 night readings). Lower nocturnal than daytime PWV and cSBP were observed in both groups. Nocturnal PWV and cSBP dipping were attenuated in T2DM patients compared to controls (PWV: -0.3 ± 0.9 vs. -0.7 ± 0.9 m/s, P = 0.04, cSBP: -8 ± 14 vs. -18 ± 18 mmHg, P < 0.01). No group differences in PWV or cSBP were observed during daytime (T2D vs. controls, PWV: 9.2 ± 1.1 vs. 9.2 ± 1.3 m/s, P = 0.99, cSBP: 133 ± 19 vs. 137 ± 25 mmHg, P = 0.42) or nighttime (PWV: 8.9 ± 1.3 vs. 8.4 ± 1.3 m/s, P = 0.14, cSBP 124 ± 20 vs. 118 ± 27 mmHg, P = 0.26). The study findings indicate that the nocturnal dipping of PWV and cSBP is attenuated in T2DM patients. The significant number of missing measurements raises concerns regarding the clinical utility of the Arteriograph 24 device.

Effect of vitamin B2, vitamin C, vitamin D, vitamin E and folic acid in adults with essential hypertension: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

ObjectivesThe objective of the current study is to compare the treatment effects of different vitamins on essential hypertension to provide an initial basis for developing evidence-based practices.DesignSystematic review and network...

Agreement Between Guideline Thresholds Using an "All-in-One" Device to Measure Office, Home, and Ambulatory Blood Pressures.

Blood pressure (BP) thresholds for diagnosing and managing hypertension vary for office, home, and ambulatory readings, and between guideline documents. This analysis determined corresponding office, home, and ambulatory BP thresholds using baseline data from the HI-JAMP (Home-Activity Information and Communication Technology-Based Japan Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Prospective) study, which used a validated "all-in-one" BP monitoring device. Data from 2322 treated patients with hypertension who underwent office BP measurement, then 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring, then home BP monitoring for 5 days were analyzed. Corresponding BP thresholds for office, home, and ambulatory measurements were determined using Deming regression. Values equivalent to office systolic BP (SBP) of 120 and 140 mm Hg were as follows: 115.9 and 127.7 mm Hg for 24-hour ambulatory SBP; 120.8 and 134.0 mm Hg for daytime ambulatory SBP; 104.9 and 117.9 mm Hg for nighttime ambulatory SBP; and 122.0 and 134.2 mm Hg for morning-evening average home SBP. Deming regression showed that morning-evening average home SBP and daytime ambulatory SBP were almost the same (home SBP=0.99×daytime ambulatory SBP+0.27 mm Hg; r=0.627). Morning-evening average home SBP values of 120 and 135 mm Hg were equivalent to daytime ambulatory SBP values of 119.1 and 133.9 mm Hg, respectively. A home SBP threshold of 130 mm Hg corresponded to 24-hour and nighttime ambulatory SBP values of 123.5 and 113.6 mm Hg, whereas a home SBP threshold of 135 mm Hg corresponded to 24-hour and nighttime ambulatory SBP values of 128.0 and 119.2 mm Hg. Ambulatory and home BP thresholds in this analysis were similar to those proposed by existing guidelines. The similarity between the home BP and daytime ambulatory BP thresholds was a clinically relevant finding.

The correlation between ambulatory blood pressure parameters and cardiovascular risk factors in older adults with high-risk hypertension

Objective: To explore the correlation of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring (ABPM) parameters and cardiovascular risk factors in older adults with high-risk hypertension. Material and method: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 96 older adults (≥ 60 years old) with treated high-risk hypertension. Socio-demographic and cardiovascular risk information were gathered. The patients were performed 24-hour ABPM. Results: The mean age was 70.88 ± 7.86 years, and 64.6% were women. The prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors was as follows: dyslipidemia: 80.2%, family history of hypertension: 54.2%, diabetes mellitus: 51%, smoking: 24%, prior stroke: 11.5%. Significant differences in 24-hour, awake, and sleep systolic BP were observed between men and women. There were significant correlations between 24-hour mean systolic BP with age (r = 0.229, p = 0.025), dyslipidemia (r = 0.223, p = 0.029), family history of hypertension (r = 0.214, p = 0.036), BMI (r = 0.212, p = 0.039), waist circumference (r = 0.226, p = 0.027) and creatinine level (r = 0.207, p = 0.043). There were significant correlations between 24-hour mean diastolic BP with BMI (r = 0.289, p = 0.004) and prior stroke (r = -0.224, p = 0.029). There were significant correlations between 24-hour mean BP with BMI (r = 0.268, p = 0.009), waist circumference (r = 0.220, p = 0.032) and prior stroke (r = -0.215, p = 0.036). Conclusion: There were significant correlations between ABPM parameters and cardiovascular risk factors in older adults with high-risk hypertension. Key words: 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure, cardiovascular risk factors, high-risk hypertension, older adults, correlation.

Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation and Cardiovascular Outcomes for Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Sham-controlled trials are needed to characterize the effect of hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HGNS) therapy on cardiovascular end points in patients with moderate-severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). To determine the effect of therapeutic levels of HGNS, compared to sham levels, on blood pressure, sympathetic activity, and vascular function. This double-blind, sham-controlled, randomized crossover therapy trial was conducted from 2018 to 2022 at 3 separate academic medical centers. Adult patients with OSA who already had an HGNS device implanted and were adherent and clinically optimized to HGNS therapy were included. Participants who had fallen asleep while driving within 1 year prior to HGNS implantation were excluded from the trial. Data analysis was performed from January to September 2022. Participants underwent a 4-week period of active HGNS therapy and a 4-week period of sham HGNS therapy in a randomized order. Each 4-week period concluded with collection of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), pre-ejection period (PEP), and flow-mediated dilation (FMD) values. The change in mean 24-hour systolic blood pressure was the primary outcome, with other ABPM end points exploratory, and PEP and FMD were cosecondary end points. Participants (n = 60) were older (mean [SD] age, 67.3 [9.9] years), overweight (mean [SD] body mass index, calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared, 28.7 [4.6]), predominantly male (38 [63%]), and had severe OSA at baseline (mean [SD] apnea-hypopnea index, 33.1 [14.9] events/h). There were no differences observed between active and sham therapy in 24-hour systolic blood pressure (mean change on active therapy, -0.18 [95% CI, -2.21 to 1.84] mm Hg), PEP (mean change on active therapy, 0.11 [95% CI, -5.43 to 5.66] milliseconds), or FMD (mean change on active therapy, -0.17% [95% CI, -1.88% to 1.54%]). Larger differences between active and sham therapy were observed in a per-protocol analysis set (n = 20) defined as experiencing at least a 50% reduction in apnea-hypopnea index between sham and active treatment. In this sham-controlled HGNS randomized clinical trial, mean 24-hour systolic blood pressure and other cardiovascular measures were not significantly different between sham and active HGNS therapy. Several methodologic lessons can be gleaned to inform future HGNS randomized clinical trials. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03359096.

Pulse Wave Analysis in Obese Children with and without Metabolic Syndrome

To compare pulse wave analysis (PWA) of obese children with and without metabolic syndrome (MS) with healthy, non-obese children and to evaluate the association between PWA findings and additional risk factors present in children with MS and obesity. From the obese patients examined between June 2019 and June 2021, 41 patients with MS, 36 obese patients without MS, and 34 healthy non-obese children of similar age and gender were evaluated retrospectively. Anthropometric measurements, biochemical evaluation, 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure (BP) measurement (ABPM), left ventricular mass index (LVMI) and PWA measurements were compared. When the three groups were compared, weight standard deviation score (SDS), height SDS and body mass index SDS were all significantly higher in the MS group (p<0.05). The following measurements were significantly higher in both MS and non-MS obese patients compared to the control group: from ABPM measures, the systolic and mean arterial pressure BP SDSs load; from PWA, the night central systolic BP, 24-hour, day and night pulse pressure values and 24-hour, day and night pulse wave velocity (PWV) rates; and from cardiac evaluations, the LVMI and relative wall thickness measurements (all p<0.05). Furthermore, the 24-hour and daytime central systolic (cSBP) and diastolic BP (cDBP) values were significantly different between the three groups, being the highest in the MS group (p<0.05). Obesity causes higher office, ambulatory and central BP, PWV and LVMI. However our results suggest that additional risk factors associated with MS do not contribute to these parameters, except for 24-hour and daytime cSBP and cDBP values.

Effect of Dietary Sodium on Blood Pressure

Dietary sodium recommendations are debated partly due to variable blood pressure (BP) response to sodium intake. Furthermore, the BP effect of dietary sodium among individuals taking antihypertensive medications is understudied. To examine the distribution of within-individual BP response to dietary sodium, the difference in BP between individuals allocated to consume a high- or low-sodium diet first, and whether these varied according to baseline BP and antihypertensive medication use. Prospectively allocated diet order with crossover in community-based participants enrolled between April 2021 and February 2023 in 2 US cities. A total of 213 individuals aged 50 to 75 years, including those with normotension (25%), controlled hypertension (20%), uncontrolled hypertension (31%), and untreated hypertension (25%), attended a baseline visit while consuming their usual diet, then completed 1-week high- and low-sodium diets. High-sodium (approximately 2200 mg sodium added daily to usual diet) and low-sodium (approximately 500 mg daily total) diets. Average 24-hour ambulatory systolic and diastolic BP, mean arterial pressure, and pulse pressure. Among the 213 participants who completed both high- and low-sodium diet visits, the median age was 61 years, 65% were female and 64% were Black. While consuming usual, high-sodium, and low-sodium diets, participants' median systolic BP measures were 125, 126, and 119 mm Hg, respectively. The median within-individual change in mean arterial pressure between high- and low-sodium diets was 4 mm Hg (IQR, 0-8 mm Hg; P < .001), which did not significantly differ by hypertension status. Compared with the high-sodium diet, the low-sodium diet induced a decline in mean arterial pressure in 73.4% of individuals. The commonly used threshold of a 5 mm Hg or greater decline in mean arterial pressure between a high-sodium and a low-sodium diet classified 46% of individuals as "salt sensitive." At the end of the first dietary intervention week, the mean systolic BP difference between individuals allocated to a high-sodium vs a low-sodium diet was 8 mm Hg (95% CI, 4-11 mm Hg; P < .001), which was mostly similar across subgroups of age, sex, race, hypertension, baseline BP, diabetes, and body mass index. Adverse events were mild, reported by 9.9% and 8.0% of individuals while consuming the high- and low-sodium diets, respectively. Dietary sodium reduction significantly lowered BP in the majority of middle-aged to elderly adults. The decline in BP from a high- to low-sodium diet was independent of hypertension status and antihypertensive medication use, was generally consistent across subgroups, and did not result in excess adverse events. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04258332.

Immediate post-ablation renal nerve stimulation predicted blood pressure reductions 6 months following renal denervation

Abstract Background Renal denervation (RDN) has been recognized as an alternative treatment strategy for blood pressure (BP) control. There is no consensus on which intra-procedural parameters could reliably predict BP-lowering responses following RDN, which usually occur months later. Purpose This study aimed to evaluate systolic BP (SBP) changes induced by renal nerve stimulation (RNS) during RDN and its associations with BP-lowering responses 6 months following RDN. Methods Seventeen patients with hypertension who underwent radiofrequency RDN between February 2019 and March 2021 were prospectively included. RNS was performed immediately before and after RDN in bilateral proximal and distal main renal arteries under general anesthesia. The responder was defined as 24-hour SBP reduction of ≥10 mmHg 6 months following RDN. Results RNS-induced SBP changes significantly decreased after RDN in all 4 sites of bilateral main renal arteries (all p&amp;lt;0.05). The mean 24-hour SBP were 144±16 mmHg and 131±15 mmHg at baseline and 6 months after RDN, respectively. Nine (53%) patients were responders. Compared to non-responders, the responders had significantly lower RNS-induced SBP changes in proximal main renal arteries immediately after RDN (right, 15.3±9.6 mmHg vs. 31.6±9.6 mmHg, p=0.005; left, 11.6±6.9 mmHg vs. 27.9±10.2 mmHg, p=0.002). All 7 patients with RNS-induced SBP increases of &amp;lt;20 mmHg after RDN in bilateral proximal main renal arteries were responders. Conclusions An RNS-induced SBP increase of &amp;lt;20 mmHg in bilateral proximal main renal arteries immediately after RDN was associated with significant 24-hour SBP reductions 6 months following RDN. Whether RNS-induced SBP changes could predict or even guide RDN strategies awaits further verifications.