24-h Growth Hormone Concentration Research Articles

Somatotropic axis in hypocretin-deficient narcoleptic humans: altered circadian distribution of GH-secretory events.

Narcolepsy is a sleep disorder caused by impaired hypocretin (orexin) neurotransmission. Growth hormone (GH) secretion may be altered in narcolepsy for various reasons. Slow-wave sleep episodes, which are closely associated with GH-secretory events, are more randomly dispersed over 24 h in narcoleptics. Furthermore, hypocretins may inhibit pituitary GH release. We assessed the function of the somatotropic axis in narcolepsy by deconvolving 24-h (10-min sampling interval) plasma GH concentration profiles in seven hypocretin-deficient narcoleptic patients and in seven healthy controls matched for age, sex, and body weight. Both basal and pulsatile GH secretion rate and secretagogue-induced GH release were similar in patients and controls. However, narcoleptics secreted approximately 50% of their total production during the daytime, whereas controls secreted only 25% during the day. Also, the GH output pattern of narcoleptics was significantly less regular. We propose that hypocretin deficiency disrupts the circadian distribution of hypothalamic GH-releasing hormone release in narcoleptic patients to simultaneously cause daytime GH release and promote their propensity to fall asleep during the day.

Tripartite Neuroendocrine Activation of the Human Growth Hormone (GH) Axis in Women by Continuous 24-Hour GH-Releasing Peptide Infusion: Pulsatile, Entropic, and Nyctohemeral Mechanisms1

Despite the discovery of potent GH-releasing peptides (GHRPs) more than 15 yr ago and the recent cloning of human, rat, and pig GHRP receptors in the hypothalamus and pituitary gland, the neuroregulatory mechanisms of action of GHRP agonists on the human hypothalamo-somatotroph unit are not well delineated. To gain such clinical insights, we evaluated the ultradian (pulsatile), entropic (pattern orderliness), and nyctohemeral GH secretory responses during continuous 24-h i.v. infusion of saline vs. the most potent clinically available hexapeptide, GHRP-2 (1 microg/kg x h) in estrogen-unreplaced (mean serum estradiol, 12 +/- 2.4 pg/mL) postmenopausal women (n = 7) in a paired, randomized design. Blood was sampled every 10 min for 24 h during infusions and was assayed by ultrasensitive GH chemiluminescence assay. Pulsatile GH secretion was quantitated by deconvolution analysis, orderliness of GH release patterns by the approximate entropy statistic, and 24-h GH rhythmicity by cosinor analysis. Statistical analysis revealed that GHRP-2 elicited a 7.7-fold increase in (24-h) mean serum (+/-SEM) GH concentrations, viz. from 0.32 +/- 0.042 (saline) to 2.4 +/- 0.34 microg/L (GHRP-2; P = 0.0006). This occurred via markedly stimulated pulsatile GH release, namely a 7.1-fold augmentation of GH secretory burst mass: 0.87 +/- 0.18 (control) vs. 6.3 +/- 1.3 microg/L (GHRP-2; P = 0.0038). Enhanced GH pulse mass reflected a commensurate 10-fold (P = 0.023) rise in GH secretory burst amplitude [maximal GH secretory rate (micrograms per L/min) attained within a secretory pulse] with no prolongation in event duration. GH burst frequency, interpulse interval, and calculated GH half-life were all invariant of GHRP-2 treatment. Concurrently, as detected in the ultrasensitive GH assay, GHRP-2 augmented deconvolution-estimated interpulse (basal) GH secretion by 4.5-fold (P = 0.025). The approximate entropy of 24-h serum GH concentration profiles rose significantly during GHRP-2 infusion; i.e. from 0.592 +/- 0.073 (saline) to 0.824 +/- 0.074 (GHRP-2; P = 0.0011), signifying more irregular or disorderly GH release patterns during secretagogue stimulation. Cosinor analysis of 24-h GH rhythms disclosed a significantly earlier (daytime) acrophase at 2138 h (+/- 140 min) during GHRP-2 stimulation vs. 0457 h (+/-42 min) during saline infusion (P = 0.013). Concomitantly, the cosinor amplitude rose 6-fold (P = 0.018), and the mesor (cosine mean) rose 5-fold (P = 0.003). Fasting (0800 h) plasma insulin-like growth factor (IGF-I) concentrations rose by -11 +/- 12 microg/L during saline infusion and by 102 +/- 18 microg/L during GHRP-2 infusion (P = 0.0036). GHRP-2 infusion did not modify (24-h pooled) serum LH, FSH, or TSH concentrations and minimally increased serum (pooled) daily PRL (6.8 +/- 0.83 vs. 12 +/- 1.2 microg/L; P < 0.05) and cortisol (5.3 +/- 0.59 to 7.0 +/- 0.74; P < 0.05) concentrations. In summary, 24-h constant iv GHRP-2 infusion in the gonadoprival female neurophysiologically activates the GH-IGF-I axis by potentiating GH secretory burst mass and amplitude by 7- to 10-fold and augmenting the basal (nonpulsatile) GH secretion by 4.5-fold. GHRP-2 action is highly selective, as it does not alter GH secretory burst frequency, interpulse interval, event duration, or GH half-life. GHRP-2 effectively elevates IGF-I concentrations, unleashes greater disorderliness of GH release patterns, and heightens the 24-h rhythmicity of GH secretion. These tripartite features of GHRP-2's action in estrogen-withdrawn (postmenopausal) women also characterize normal human puberty and/or sex steroid regulation of the GH-IGF-I axis. However, how or whether GHRP-2 interacts further with sex hormone modulation of GH neurosecretory control in older women and men is not yet known.

Increased disorderliness and decreased mass and daily rate of endogenous growth hormone secretion in adult turner syndrome: the impact of body composition, maximal oxygen uptake and treatment with sex hormones

The objectives of this study were to (1) quantify pulsatility and orderliness of 24-h growth hormone (GH) secretion in adult Turner syndrome; (2) study the impact of sex steroid replacement therapy in adult Turner syndrome on these measures of GH secretion, and in addition examine the differential effect of oral vs transdermal estrogen administration on GH secretion patterns. To these ends, we used deconvolution analysis and approximate entropy (ApEn) to quantify GH release over 24 h in 21 patients with Turner syndrome before and during sex hormone substitution, compared to an age-matched control group. Deconvolution analysis revealed that the mass of GH secreted per burst and production rate was significantly lower in Turner patients compared to controls, resulting in a significantly lower integrated 24-h GH concentration. However, multiple stepwise regression revealed that lean body mass (LBM) and maximal oxygen uptake were significant discriminative variable, explaining a large part of the variation in mass secreted per burst (r = 0.72, P < 0.0005) and production rate (r = 0.73, P < 0.0005), while group (Turner or control) did not explain any of the difference. There was a significant difference in ApEn between Turner patients and controls, denoting more disorderly GH release in Turner syndrome. During administration of sex hormones, a significant increase was seen in basal secretion and GH secretory burst half-duration, as well as in integrated 24-h GH concentration. No change in ApEn was evident. We conclude that GH secretion in adult Turner syndrome is irregular, reduced in mass and production rate. The reduction in mass and production rate could be explained by differences in body composition and maximal oxygen uptake compared to relevant controls, while the irregularity of GH secretion was unexplained by the measured variables. We hypothesize that the increased irregularity could be attributable to low levels of circulating androgens or an increased biological age in the Turner patients.

Growth hormone secretion in patients with Turner's syndrome as determined by time series analysis.

Twenty-four-hour growth hormone (GH) profiles in 26 girls with Turner's syndrome were compared with those of 26 normally growing short children and 24 slowly growing short children. All children were prepubertal and below 12 years of age. A subgroup of 13 girls was treated with ethinyl estradiol and a 24-h GH profile was reassessed. In an additional group of 45 girls with Turner's syndrome (aged 6.7-18.9 years) the effect of age, spontaneous breast development and ethinyl estradiol treatment was studied. The profiles were assessed by Fourier analysis. The oscillatory activity and the mean 24-h GH concentration were similar in children with Turner's syndrome and the normally growing short children, in contrast to lower levels in the slowly growing short children. The periodicity of GH secretion was similar in all groups. In the longitudinal study, ethinyl estradiol treatment resulted in a significant increase in pulse amplitude, but not in periodicity. In the cross-sectional study there was no significant difference between the subgroups of girls with either presence or absence of breast development or ethinyl estradiol treatment. GH secretion was not significantly related to age, height in standard deviation score or height velocity. These data imply that there is no abnormality in GH secretion in girls with Turner's syndrome.

Spontaneous growth hormone secretion in healthy prepubertal children of normal stature.

To evaluate the dynamics of growth hormone (GH) secretion in healthy prepubertal children of normal stature, we determined spontaneous GH secretion by measuring GH every 30 min in 21 Japanese subjects, age: 5.4 +/- 2.3 (1.6-10.6) years; height: -1.4 +/- 1.1 (-1.98-1.77) SD. The 24-h mean GH concentration was 4.8 +/- 1.5 ng/ml. The 24-h mean GH was similar in boys and girls (mean +/- SD: 4.8 +/- 1.7 vs 4.7 +/- 1.1 ng/ml). No correlation was found between chronological age and the 24-h mean GH. The 24-h mean GH was closely correlated with GH pulse amplitude (r = 0.94; P less than 0.001), but not with the number of GH pulses. The 24-h mean GH was also highly correlated with 3-h mean GH after sleep and 3-h peak GH after sleep (r = 0.86; P less than 0.001 and r = 0.72; P less than 0.001, respectively). Our data suggest that in healthy prepubertal children of normal stature, (1) spontaneous GH secretion is independent of sex and age, (2) the amount of spontaneous GH secretion is controlled by pulse amplitude, not by number of pulses. (3) 3-h mean GH and 3-h peak GH after sleep might represent 24-h total spontaneous GH secretion.

Reproducibility of 24‐hour serum growth hormone profiles in man

To study the reproducibility of 24-h serum growth hormone (GH) concentration profiles in adults. 24-h serum GH concentrations were constructed by drawing blood samples at 20-min intervals. Four study occasions over a period of 1 year were chosen to assess the reproducibility. Six healthy adult male volunteers of normal height and weight and aged between 20 and 22 years. The resulting GH data arrays were analysed by Fourier transformation. Between and within individual variations were calculated and expressed in terms of coefficients of variation and data plotted to show variations between groups and individuals. The frequency component of GH secretion occurred with a dominant periodicity of between 160 and 240 min. Precise estimates of spectral power (strength of oscillatory activity) and period were obtained for group data, but such estimates cannot be inferred from a single profile. There was no significant difference in 24-h mean serum GH concentration over the year of study: occasion 1 (February) mean 2.0 mU/l (SD 0.5); occasion 2 (March) mean 3.7 mU/l (SD 2.8); occasion 3 (July) mean 2.7 mU/l (SD 1.4); occasion 4 (February) 2.5 mU/l (SD 1.5) (mean within individual coefficient of variation 35%, range 9-58). The concentrations of factors known to influence GH synthesis and secretion, insulin-like growth factor I, thyroxine, testosterone and oestradiol, varied little over the year of study. These data demonstrate that group data are reproducible in terms of oscillatory activity and the amount of GH secreted and that 24-h GH profiles should be used predominantly for analysing group data. The variability between individual profiles limits their value in the investigation of children with growth failure and suspected GH insufficiency.

Evaluation of 24-Hour Growth Hormone Spontaneous Secretion: Comparison with a Nocturnal and Diurnal 12-Hour Study

Spontaneous growth hormone (GH) secretion in 116 short children was studied by sampling blood for GH measurement every 20 min over 24 h. We calculated 24-h mean GH concentration (MGHC), diurnal 12-h MGHC (dMGHC) and nocturnal 12-h MGHC (nMGHC). The children were subdivided into four groups: prepubertal children with 'classical' GH deficiency (group 1, n = 12, low responses to two provocative stimuli tests and MGHC less than 3 ng/ml), prepubertal children with 'nonclassical' GH deficiency (group 2, n = 36, normal GH responses to two provocative tests and MGHC less than 3 ng/ml), short normal children (normal GH responses to two provocative tests and MGHC greater than 3 ng/ml) at stage P1 of puberty (group 3, n = 41) and at stage P2 of puberty (group 4, n = 27). The values of MGHC, dMGHC and nMGHC were significantly higher in groups 3 and 4 than in groups 1 and 2, and in group 4 than in group 3. The values of MGHC and nMGHC were significantly higher in group 2 than in group 1. MGHC correlated highly with nMGHC and dMGHC (r = 0.97 and 0.94, respectively; p less than 0.001). On the basis of regression equations between MGHC and nMGHC or dMGHC, the study of the diagnostic accuracy showed values higher for nMGHC than for dMGHC: 94.1 vs. 89.6% for sensitivity, and 93.7 vs. 89.7% for specificity, respectively.

Growth hormone (GH) provocative testing frequently does not reflect endogenous GH secretion.

GH secretion was studied in 73 children with classical GH deficiency or GH neurosecretory dysfunction (GHND), intrinsic short stature, or normal stature. The GH-deficient group was defined by a peak GH secretory response below 10 ng/ml to all provocative tests (arginine, L-dopa, insulin hypoglycemia, and clonidine). GHND was defined by a mean serum 24-h GH concentration below 3 ng/ml, with a normal response (greater than or equal to 10 ng/ml) to provocative testing. Twenty-one GH-deficient children, 21 children with GHND, and 18 short control children underwent provocative GH testing and a 24-h study with GH sampling every 20 min. A group of 13 normal stature control children also underwent 24-h GH sampling. The mean stimulated peak serum GH level [4.7 +/- 0.6 (+/- SEM) ng/ml] in the GH-deficient group was significantly below that in the GHND (19.5 +/- 1.7 ng/ml) and short control groups (24.0 +/- 3.5 ng/ml; P less than 0.01). The mean 24-h serum GH concentration was reduced in GH-deficient (1.5 +/- 0.2 ng/ml) and GHND (2.0 +/- 0.1 ng/ml) children compared to those in short (5.6 +/- 0.5 ng/ml) and normal stature (5.8 +/- 0.8 ng/ml) control children (P less than 0.01). Peak GH concentrations after provocative testing correlated poorly with 24-h mean concentrations in GH-deficient, GHND, and short control children (r = 0.38, 0.23, and 0.41, respectively; P = NS for all groups). Mean serum GH concentrations from blood sampling intervals of 12 h (day/night; 0800-2000/2000-0800 h, respectively) or even 6 h (day; 0900-1500 h) were statistically different in GHND or GH-deficient groups compared to those in control children; however, there was significantly more overlap for individual children using the 6- and 12-h daytime intervals than for the 24-h data. Plasma somatomedin-C/insulin-like growth factor I correlated with mean 24-h GH concentration endogenous secretion (r = 0.7; P less than 0.001). These data suggest that provocative GH testing frequently does not correlate with endogenous GH secretion.