Abstract Background Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is a potentially fatal disease, commonly presenting with arrhythmias, heart failure, or sudden death. Diagnostic challenges persist, particularly due to limited sensitivity of endomyocardial biopsy (20-25%). Alternative diagnostic approaches, such as criteria-based diagnosis, have emerged. 18fluorine-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG-PET) has gained prominence in diagnosing CS, monitoring treatment, and serving as a follow-up tool, although its precise role and efficacy remain unclear. Purpose This retrospective cohort study sought to characterize patients with CS who underwent at least one 118F-FDG-PET scan. Primary objectives were to explore the impact of 18F-FDG-PET on both the diagnosis and management of CS. Additionally, this study aimed to investigate any differences in patient outcomes based on the results of their first follow-up 18F-FDG-PET scan. Methods Medical records of 69 patients with CS who underwent at least one 18F-FDG-PET scan were analyzed. The study calculated the proportion of 18F-FDG PET scans influencing CS treatment and diagnosis, with 56 patients undergoing at least two scans. Among these, 53 patients were categorized into two groups based on their first follow-up scan results (group 1:no change/progress, group 2:regress). Statistical analyses included independent t-tests, the Mann-Whitney test, and Fisher's exact test. Outcome measures included death, heart transplantation or aborted cardiac death, with survival analyzed by Kaplan-Meier statistics. Results Among 69 patients, 204 18F-FDG-PET scans were conducted, with 47% directly influencing treatment decisions. Twenty-five patients were diagnosed with CS through 18F-FDG-PET. While no significant differences were observed regarding demographics and clinical features, the results suggested potential differences in event-free survival (p=0.084;Figure 1) and sex (p=0.08) between the groups. Conclusions 18F-FDG-PET has emerged as a pivotal tool in regulating treatment, diagnosing, and monitoring CS patients, playing a fundamental role in assessing treatment response. However, further studies are needed.