Abstract The capacity for flight varies widely among bird species and influences their ecology, evolution, and conservation. Variation in vagility is influenced by behavioral responses to the nature of gaps between habitat elements as well as intrinsic characteristics of the species, particularly physiological traits influencing the physical capacity for sustained flight. Here, we briefly summarize the current state of knowledge revealing the wide variety of movement capacities of Neotropical birds. We then review current knowledge of avian muscle physiology and the role that muscle characteristics may play in influencing movement behavior. We argue that fundamental shifts in our understanding of avian muscle physiology and the influence of physiology on movement behavior remain to be elucidated, in part because knowledge from other vertebrates is being inappropriately applied to birds. In particular, critical evaluation of assumptions applied to birds from detailed studies of mammals is needed. Moving away from simple binary categorizations of avian flight muscles as “red vs. white” or “fast vs. slow” to characterize the cellular mechanisms and specific isoforms active at various life stages or seasons is also needed. An increasingly large number of avian species with a wide array of flight styles from hummingbirds to soaring raptors are appearing in GenBank, facilitating detailed physiological and evolutionary comparisons among species. Properly assessing the muscle physiological characteristics of Neotropical bird species with a wide array of movement capacities may improve our abilities to predict which species are most sensitive to landscape fragmentation and other factors that influence dispersal and migration.

Abstract In the Northern Hemisphere, several avian cavity excavators (e.g., woodpeckers) orient their cavities increasingly toward the equator as latitude increases (i.e. farther north), and it is proposed that they do so to take advantage of incident solar radiation at their nests. If latitude is a key driver of cavity orientations globally, this pattern should extend to the Southern Hemisphere. Here, we test the prediction that cavities are oriented increasingly northward at higher (i.e. colder) latitudes in the Southern Hemisphere and describe the preferred entrance direction(s) of 1,501 cavities excavated by 25 avian species (n = 22 Picidae, 2 Trogonidae, 1 Furnariidae) across 12 terrestrial ecoregions (15°S to 55°S) in South America. We used Bayesian projected normal mixed-effects models for circular data to examine the influence of latitude, and potential confounding factors, on cavity orientation. Also, a probability model-selection procedure was used to simultaneously examine multiple orientation hypotheses in each ecoregion to explore underlying cavity-orientation patterns. Contrary to predictions, and patterns from the Northern Hemisphere, birds did not orient their cavities more toward the equator with increasing latitude, suggesting that latitude may not be an important underlying selective force shaping excavation behavior in South America. Moreover, unimodal cavity-entrance orientations were not frequent among the ecoregions analyzed (only in 4 ecoregions), whereas bimodal (in 5 ecoregions) or uniform (in 3 ecoregions) orientations were also present, although many of these patterns were not very clear. Our results highlight the need to include data from under-studied biotas and regions to improve inferences at macroecological scales. Furthermore, we suggest a re-analysis of Northern Hemisphere cavity orientation patterns using a multi-model approach, and a more comprehensive assessment of the role of environmental factors as drivers of cavity orientation at different spatial scales in both hemispheres.

Abstract Sexual habitat segregation during the wintering period is a widespread phenomenon and has important implications for the ecology and conservation of migratory birds. We studied Black-and-white Warblers (Mniotilta varia) wintering in second-growth scrub and old-growth mangrove forest in Jamaica to quantify sexual habitat segregation and explore whether patterns of habitat occupation have consequences on physical condition. We used this information along with a body size analysis and simulated territorial intrusions to assess whether behavioral dominance or habitat specialization was responsible for habitat segregation. Based on standardized capture data, we found that females were more abundant than males in both scrub and mangrove forests. Foraging observations, however, suggested vertical segregation within each habitat, with females foraging primarily near the ground and males in the mid-canopy and canopy, indicating that our sex ratio estimates may be biased. Using 2 measures of body condition, we show that males were in better body condition than females, regardless of habitat. We found that males were on average slightly larger than females, and home range analysis and simulated territorial intrusions indicated that males were more territorial than females. We argue that the observed vertical sexual habitat segregation is likely caused by behavioral dominance rather than habitat specialization. Winter body condition is known to carry over to affect migration timing, reproductive success, and annual survival in other songbirds, and therefore sexual habitat segregation may have important implications for year-round population dynamics in Black-and-white Warblers.