Precision of cleft lip and/or palate antenatal diagnosis plays a significant role in counselling, neonatal care, surgical strategies and psychological support of the family. This study aims to measure the accuracy of antenatal diagnosis in our institution and the detection rate of cleft lip and/or palate on routine morphologic ultrasonography. In this retrospective observational study, we compared antenatal and postnatal diagnosis of 233 patients followed in our unit. We classified our patients according to the Kernahan and Stark's classification system: Group 1: facial cleft including labial and labio-maxillary clefts; Group 2: facial cleft including total, subtotal and submucous palatal clefts; Group 3: labio-maxillary-palatal clefts. Out of 233 patients, 104 were antenatally diagnosed with a facial cleft, i.e., an overall detection rate of 44.6%. The diagnosis was confirmed at birth in 65 of these patients, i.e., an overall accuracy of 62.5%. Of the 67 children (29.2%) in Group 1, the screening detection rate was 58.2% with an antenatal diagnostic accuracy of 48.7%. Of the 97 children (41.6%) in Group 2, the screening detection rate was 2% with an antenatal diagnostic accuracy of 50%. Of the 69 children (29.6%) in Group 3, the screening detection rate was 91.3% with an antenatal diagnostic accuracy of 71.4%. Our study demonstrates a relatively poor diagnostic accuracy in prenatal ultrasound, where the diagnosis was inaccurate in one third to one half of patients. It showed great variability in the screening detection rate depending on the diagnostic group observed, as well as a low rate of detection of palatal clefts.

ObjectivesThis study aimed to evaluate the risk of congenital malformation among pregnant women exposed to the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines during the first trimester of pregnancy, which is a developmental period where the foetus is at risk of teratogenicity. MethodsPregnant women were prospectively enrolled from March 2021 to March 2022, at the time of COVID-19 vaccination. Pregnant women exposed to at least one dose of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine from conception to 11 weeks of gestations and 6 days were compared with pregnant women exposed to the vaccine from 12 weeks to the end of pregnancy. The primary outcome was a confirmed congenital malformation at birth. ResultsA total of 1450 pregnant women were enrolled including 124 in the first trimester and 1326 in the second and third trimester. The overall proportion of congenital malformation was 0.81% (n = 1/124; 95% CI: 0.02–4.41) and 0.83% (n = 11/1326; 95% CI: 0.41–1.48) among pregnant exposed to the COVID-19 vaccine during the first and second/third trimester, respectively. First trimester exposure was not associated with a higher risk of congenital malformation with a relative risk of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.12–6.80) with no significant changes after adjustment through exploratory analysis. ConclusionsPregnant women exposed to mRNA COVID-19 vaccine before 12 weeks of gestation did not have an increased risk of congenital malformation compared with women exposed outside the teratogenic window. Because vaccination is safe and effective, emphasis must be placed on promoting vaccination during pregnancy.

AbstractIntroductionThe main objective of this study is to conduct an individual patient data meta-analysis with collaborators from various countries to identify SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes.MethodsEligible studies included registries and single- or multi-site cohort studies that recruited pregnant and recently postpartum women with confirmed COVID-19. Studies must have enrolled at least 25 women within a defined catchment area. Studies also had to have data that overlapped more than a single COVID-19 variant time period. We invited principal investigators already participating in an ongoing sequential, prospective meta-analysis of perinatal COVID-19. Investigators shared individual patient data (IPD) with the technical team for review and analysis. We examined 31 outcomes related to: i) COVID-19 severity (n=5); ii) maternal morbidities including adverse birth outcomes (n=14); iii) fetal and neonatal morbidity and mortality (n=5) and iv) adverse birth outcomes (n=8). SARS-CoV-2 strains that have been identified as variants of concern (VOC) by the WHO were analyzed using the publicly available strain frequency data byNextstrain.organd strains were classified as dominant when they were more than half of sequences in a given geographic area. We applied a 2-stage IPD meta-analytic framework to generate pooled relative risks, with 95% CI for each dominant variant and outcome pair when there were one or more studies with available data.ResultsOur data show that the Delta wave, compared to Omicron, was associated with a higher risk of all adverse COVID-19 severity outcomes in pregnancy including risk of hospitalization [RR 4.02 (95% CI 1.10, 14.69), n=1 study], risk of ICU admissions [RR 2.59 (95% CI 1.26, 5.30, n=3 studies], risk of critical care admission [RR 2.52 (95% CI 1.25, 5.08, n=3 studies], risk of needing ventilation [RR 3.96 (95% CI 1.47, 10.71), n=3 studies] and risk of pneumonia [RR 6.73 (95% CI 2.17, 20.90), n=3 studies]. The majority of maternal morbidity and mortality indicators were not at increased risk during any of the COVID-19 variant waves except hemorrhage, any Cesarean section, intrapartum Cesarean section and maternal composite outcome, although data was limited. Risk of fetal and neonatal morbidity and mortality did not show significant increases in risks during any of the COVID-19 waves except stillbirth and perinatal death during the Delta wave ([RR 4.84 (95% CI 1.37, 17.05, n=3 studies], [RR 6.03 (95%CI 1.63, 22.34), n=3 studies], respectively) when compared to the Pre-alpha wave. Adverse birth outcomes including very low birthweight and very preterm birth also showed increased risks during the Delta wave compared to the Pre-alpha wave.DiscussionDuring periods of Delta strain predominance, all COVID-19 severity outcomes were more severe among pregnant women, compared to periods when other COVID-19 strains predominated. In addition, there are limited data comparing the impact of different variants on pregnancy outcomes. This highlights the importance of ongoing genomic surveillance among special populations.

SARS-CoV-2 positive pregnant women are at higher risk of adverse outcomes, but little evidence is available on how variants impact that risk. We aim to evaluate maternal and perinatal outcomes among unvaccinated pregnant women that tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, stratified by pre-Delta, Delta, and Omicron periods. This prospective study enrolled women from March 2020 to September 2022. Exposure to the different SARS-CoV-2 variants was defined by their periods of predominance. The primary outcome was severe maternal adverse outcome defined as either intensive care unit admission, acute respiratory distress syndrome, advanced oxygen supplementation, or maternal death. The secondary outcomes were preterm birth and other perinatal outcomes. Overall, 1402, 262, and 391 SARS-CoV-2 positive pregnant women were enrolled during the pre-Delta, Delta, and Omicron periods respectively. Severe maternal adverse outcome was reported in 3.4% (n=947/1402; 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) 2.5-4.5), 6.5% (n = 7/262; 95%CI 3.8-10.2), and 1.0% (n = 4/391; 95%CI 0.3-2.6) of women during the pre-Delta, Delta, and Omicron periods. The risk of severe maternal adverse outcome was higher during the Delta vs pre-Delta period (adjusted risk ratio (aRR)=1.8; 95%CI 1.1-3.2) and lower during the Omicron vs pre-Delta period (aRR=0.3; 95%CI, 0.1-0.8). The risks of hospitalization for COVID-19 were 12.6% (n = 176/1402; 95%CI 10.9-14.4), 17.2% (n = 45/262; 95%CI 12.8-22.3), and 12.5% (n = 49/391; 95%CI 9.4-16.2), during the pre-Delta, Delta, and Omicron period, respectively. Pregnancy complications occurred after SARS-CoV-2 exposure in 30.0% (n=363/1212; 95%CI 27.4-32.6), 35.2% (n=83/236; 95%CI 29.1-41.6), and 30.3% (n=105/347; 95%CI 25.5-35.4) of patients during the pre-Delta, Delta, and Omicron periods, respectively. Stillbirths were reported in 0.5% (n=6/1159; 95%CI 0.2-1.1), 2.8% (n=6/210; 95%CI 1.0-6.0), and 0.9% (n=2/213; 95%CI 0.1-3.4) or patients during the pre-Delta, Delta, and Omicron periods respectively. The Delta period was associated with a higher risk of severe maternal adverse outcome and the Omicron period with a lower risk of severe adverse outcome compared to pre-Delta era. The reported risk of hospitalization was high during the Omicron period and should not be trivialized. Swiss Federal Office of Public Health, Fondation CHUV.

The Nurse consultation (CI) was implemented in 2013 at the emergency department of the Lausanne Children's Hospital. It offers medical delegated care for children aged three to 18. Ten years after its implementation, this article takes stock of its progress. Patients and families are satisfied with the care provided at a rate of 94.3 %. The CI seems to offer quality and safe healthcare. It allows the emergency team to have more time and resources for patients whose lives are at risk or need careful assessment due to their age or medical history. The CI is an innovative and relevant model of care in the context of uncomplicated childhood illnesses.

ObjectiveTo describe the mental health of perinatal women in five European countries during the third pandemic wave and identify risk factors related to depressive and anxiety symptoms.DesignA cross-sectional, online survey-based study.SettingBelgium, Norway, Switzerland, the Netherlands and the UK, 10 June 2021–22 August 2021.ParticipantsPregnant and up to 3 months postpartum women, older than 18 years of age.Primary outcome measureThe Edinburgh Depression Scale (EDS) and the Generalised Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7) were used to assess mental health status. Univariate and multivariate generalised linear models were performed to identify factors associated with poor mental health.Results5210 women participated (including 3411 pregnant and 1799 postpartum women). The prevalence of major depressive symptoms (EDS ≥13) was 16.1% in the pregnancy group and 17.0% in the postpartum . Moderate to severe generalised anxiety symptoms (GAD ≥10) were found among 17.3% of the pregnant and 17.7% of the postpartum women. Risk factors associated with poor mental health included having a pre-existing mental illness, a chronic somatic illness, having had COVID-19 or its symptoms, smoking, unplanned pregnancy and country of residence. Among COVID-19 restrictive measures specific to perinatal care, pregnant and postpartum women were most anxious about not having their partner present at the time of delivery, that their partner had to leave the hospital early and to be separated from their newborn after the delivery.ConclusionApproximately one in six pregnant or postpartum women reported major depression or anxiety symptoms during the third wave of the pandemic. These findings suggest a continued need to monitor depression and anxiety in pregnancy and postpartum populations throughout and in the wake of the pandemic. Tailored support and counselling are essential to reduce the burden of the pandemic on perinatal and infant mental health.

Tinea capitis is a superficial dermatophytic infection of the scalp. This common dermatosis occurs predominantly in children. The clinical manifestation of the disease is heterogeneous, and vary widely depending on the pathogenic fungal agent. Direct mycological examination and cultures are mandatory for an accurate diagnosis and species identification. Treatment should be both local and systemic, and ideally is tailored to the dermatophytic species identified by the laboratory diagnostic work up. Secondary prophylaxis through supplementary measures is crucial to avoid epidemic outbreak and patient reinfection.

The objective of this study was to describe the use of COVID-19-related medicines during pregnancy and their evolution between the early/late periods of the pandemic. Pregnant women who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 from March 2020 to July 2021 were included using the COVI-PREG registry. Exposure to the following COVID-19-related medicines was recorded: antibiotics, antivirals, hydroxychloroquine, corticosteroids, anti-interleukin-6 and immunoglobulins. We described the prevalence of medicines used, by trimester of pregnancy, maternal COVID-19 severity level and early/late period of the pandemic (before and after 1 July 2020). We included 1964 pregnant patients who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. Overall, 10.4% (205/1964) received at least one COVID-19-related medicine including antibiotics (8.6%; 169/1694), corticosteroids (3.2%; 62/1964), antivirals (2.0%; 39/1964), hydroxychloroquine (1.4%; 27/1964) and anti-interleukin-6 (0.3%; 5/1964). The use of at least one COVID-19-related medicine was 3.1% (12/381) in asymptomatic individuals, 4.2% (52/1233) in outpatients, 19.7% (46/233) in inpatients without oxygen, 72.1% (44/61) in those requiring standard oxygen, 95.7% (22/23) in those requiring high flow oxygen, 96.2% (25/26) in patients who required intubation and 57.1% (4/7) among patients who died. The proportion who received medicines to treat COVID-19 was higher before than after July 2020 (16.7% vs. 7.7%). Antibiotics, antivirals and hydroxychloroquine had lower rates of use during the late period. Medicine use in pregnancy increased with disease severity. The trend towards increased use of corticosteroids seems to be aligned with changing guidelines. Evidence is still needed regarding the effectiveness and safety of COVID-19-related medicines in pregnancy.

Vaccination and Vaccination Response in Immunodeficiency Abstract. Vaccination of patients with immunodeficiencies is challenging. A lack of increase in vaccine antibody titers or vaccine-induced infections may indicate primary immunodeficiency. All vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 licensed in Switzerland can be administered to immunocompromised patients.