International guidelines recommend percutaneous coronary intervention within 120 min for high-risk acute coronary syndrome. In Indonesia, a sprawling archipelago with a rising cardiovascular burden, the ministry of health is expanding catheterisation laboratory (cath lab) infrastructure. This study aims to evaluate the current distribution, population coverage and 'effective access' to cath labs to inform equitable infrastructure planning. We conducted a cross-sectional geospatial analysis using a primary hospital survey (January-June 2024) to identify 335 functional cath labs. Travel times were estimated from the midpoints of all inhabited subdistricts (kecamatan) to the nearest facility using road network modelling. Primary outcomes included cath lab density per million population and the proportion of the population within successive 30 min travel thresholds. Secondary outcomes assessed 'effective coverage' by adjusting for National Health Insurance (BPJS) credentialing. Nationally, cath lab density is 1.23 per million population, with a median travel time of 54 min. While 73.0% of the total population can reach a facility within 120 min, stark disparities exist: 95% of urban residents have 2-hour access compared with 66.9% in rural areas. Regionally, Java (92.3%) and Bali (91.5%) show high coverage, while Papua and Maluku face critical gaps, with >80% of the population requiring more than 3 hours of travel. 46.3% of cath labs are covered by BPJS, and only 5.1% offer documented 24/7 service. When accounting for insurance status, national 2-hour coverage drops from 73.0% to 63.5%. Although geographical access appears moderate at a national level, Indonesia's cardiovascular infrastructure is highly inequitable and operationally constrained. Many provinces meet density benchmarks but lack geographical coverage or financial/operational readiness. Beyond Indonesia, this approach offers a practical tool for other low- and middle-income countries to align scarce cardiac care resources with population need.

BackgroundLow socioeconomic status (SES) is linked to increased cardiovascular risk, but its association with carotid atherosclerosis in the general population is less well studied. We examined associations between individual-level and area-level SES and carotid plaque burden and explored potential sex differences.MethodsIn this cross-sectional analysis from the Akershus Cardiac Examination 1950 Study, individual-level SES was defined by educational attainment, and area-level SES by urban versus rural residence and median household income of municipality. Carotid ultrasound was used to quantify plaque burden with a plaque score (0–3 per segment; maximum 24), where >3 indicates elevated cardiovascular risk. Associations between SES and plaque score were estimated using Poisson regression in crude and adjusted models.ResultsWe included 3673 participants (48.8% women; mean age 63.9 years). The prevalence of elevated plaque score (>3) was 23.3% in tertiary, 28.2% in secondary and 31.4% in primary education groups (p for trend <0.001). Women and men with primary education had 32% and 24% higher plaque scores than those with tertiary education (p<0.001). After adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors, excess atherosclerotic burden remained 22% in women and 12% in men (p<0.001). No significant associations were observed for area-level SES, and no sex interactions were detected.ConclusionLower educational attainment is associated with higher carotid atherosclerotic burden in both sexes, independent of cardiovascular risk factors, while area-level SES shows no clear association. These findings suggest that educational disparities contribute to atherosclerotic disease burden and merit further investigation in longitudinal studies.

BackgroundTo compare the efficacy and safety of off-label low-dose versus standard-dose antiplatelet agents in coronary heart disease (CHD) patients, focusing on the evidence gap in comparisons of low-dose versus standard-dose ticagrelor and prasugrel.MethodsPubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, China National Knowledge Infrastructure and Wanfang databases were searched up to 11 May 2025 for randomised controlled trials. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool. A meta-analysis was performed, with relative risk (RR) and 95% CI as the effect estimates. Subgroup analyses were performed stratified by antiplatelet agent type, ethnic region, treatment duration and CHD subtype.ResultsA total of 22 randomised controlled trials, involving 7486 patients, met the study criteria. Among them, 92.09% were Asian, and 63.63% of the included studies exclusively enrolled acute coronary syndrome patients. All patients received the dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin combined with a low or standard dose of P2Y12 receptor antagonist), mainly with low-dose prasugrel and ticagrelor. Off-label low-dose antiplatelet agents significantly reduced myocardial infarction (MI) (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.97) and minimal bleeding risks (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.82) compared with standard doses, with comparable risks for other ischaemic and bleeding events. Compared with standard-dose clopidogrel, they significantly reduced MI risk (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.93) but increased overall (RR 1.40, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.77) and minor bleeding risks (RR 1.86, 95% CI 1.02 to 3.38). Compared with standard-dose prasugrel or ticagrelor, they demonstrated comparable ischaemic risks and significantly reduced overall and minimal bleeding risks. All other subgroup analyses were consistent with the overall findings.ConclusionOff-label low-dose antiplatelet therapy reduces the risks of MI and minimal bleeding. It surpassed standard-dose clopidogrel and offered lower bleeding risks than prasugrel or ticagrelor, thus representing an effective secondary prevention strategy for Asian CHD.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42023438376.

BackgroundThere is a lack of contemporary data describing patients with left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction post myocardial infarction (MI) in terms of symptom burden and secondary prevention measures. The aim of this study was to describe patients with various degrees of LV systolic dysfunction after a first MI, their symptom burden, quality of life and adherence to recommended secondary prevention measures in a nationwide patient material.MethodsPatients (n=49 564) registered in the Swedish Web-System for Enhancement and Development of Evidence-Based Care in Heart Disease registry between 2011 and 2018, diagnosed with a first acute MI, discharged alive and with no previous heart failure, were stratified by degree of LV systolic dysfunction.ResultsCompared with patients with normal ejection fraction (EF≥50%), patients with a reduced EF (<30%) more often experienced shortness of breath (32.3% vs 5.6%, adjusted OR (95% CI): 7.45 (6.22 to 8.92)), had more often been readmitted (48.1% vs 31.2%, 1.87 (1.61 to 2.19)) and were more often on sick leave (26.6% vs 9.5%, 3.35 (2.45 to 4.58)), whereas there were no significant differences regarding chest pain and quality of life at the follow-up visit after 11–13 months. Patients with EF <30% had participated in education programme (44.9% vs 55.5%, 0.70 (0.60 to 0.81)) and physical therapy (11.3% vs 14.9%, 0.68 (0.58 to 0.79)) and have been physically active at least 30 min per day for at least 5 days per week (35.5% vs 40.2%, 0.86 (0.73 to 1.01)) to a lesser extent.ConclusionContemporary representative data show that LV systolic dysfunction after MI is associated with a very high symptom burden and worse secondary prevention after 11–13 months.

The obesity paradox has been described in different cardiovascular conditions. Data on the association between obesity and outcomes in patients with Takotsubo syndrome (TTS) are lacking. The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between body weight and mortality in TTS patients. Patients enrolled in the International Takotsubo Registry from January 2011 to July 2021 and with available data on body mass index (BMI) were included in the analysis. Patients were stratified according to BMI (underweight, <18.5 kg/m2; normal weight, 18.5-24.9 kg/m2; overweight, 25.0-29.9 kg/m2; obese, 30.0-34.9 kg/m2; and very obese, ≥35.0 kg/m2). The primary endpoint was mortality at 1 year. Of the 2707 patients, 222 (8.2%) were underweight, 1340 (49.5%) of normal weight, 759 (28.0%) overweight, 268 (9.9%) obese and 118 (4.4%) very obese (p=0.02). Rates of mortality at 1 year were 11.3%, 6.9%, 5.5%, 4.9% and 9.3% in underweight, normal weight, overweight, obese and very obese patients (p=0.02). Being overweight or obese was significantly associated with a lower mortality rate at 1 year (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.96, p=0.03), and this association remained significant after multivariable adjustments (adjusted HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.97, p=0.03). A U-shaped mortality curve across BMI categories was observed in TTS patients, with the highest mortality rates observed in underweight and the lowest rates observed in obese patients. These observations provide the first evidence for the existence of the obesity paradox in TTS. NCT01947621.

ObjectiveMultidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings are central to treatment decisions in aortic stenosis (AS), particularly for borderline or high-risk patients. This study evaluates long-term, real-world outcomes according to MDT-selected management strategy within routine clinical practice in this clinically important patient group.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of all patients with severe AS discussed at a transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) MDT at a tertiary UK centre between January 2014 and December 2016. Patients were categorised as TAVI or non-TAVI (conservatively managed). Demographic, clinical and frailty data were collected, including Charlson Comorbidity Index, Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) and number of prescribed medications. Survival was analysed using Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards modelling adjusted for age, sex, frailty, comorbidity burden and medication count.ResultsA total of 373 patients were included (TAVI=178; non-TAVI=195). Patients undergoing TAVI were younger (81.3 years vs 83.5 years; p=0.01) and less frail (CFS 3.9 vs 4.9; p<0.01). Survival at 1 year, 2 years and 5 years was significantly higher following TAVI (87.6%, 74.7%, 44.9%) compared with conservative management (60.8%, 44.2%, 12.1%; p<0.001). Median survival was 53 months after TAVI versus 20 months without intervention. On multivariable analysis, TAVI was independently associated with reduced mortality (HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.50; p<0.001).ConclusionsIn patients with severe AS discussed at MDT, TAVI was associated with a substantial and durable survival advantage compared with conservative management. These findings highlight the poor prognosis of untreated severe AS and support systematic inclusion of conservatively managed patients in interventional registries to better inform MDT deliberation and shared decision-making.

Mechanical compression from the ascending aorta on the left atrial anterior wall (LAAW) can cause low voltage areas (LVAs), which are associated with a higher risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after catheter ablation. This study investigates the AF recurrence rate post-LAAW complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE) ablation or LAAW linear ablation in AF patients with aortic encroachment. We retrospectively analysed AF patients who underwent first-time ablation between 2019 and 2023 in our department and had preablation cardiac CT scans. The impact of LAAW-LVAs and different LAAW ablation strategies on AF recurrence within 1-year postprocedure was evaluated. In total, 267 patients had both aortic encroachment and LAAW-LVAs. In the absence of LAAW ablation, patients with aortic encroachment had a significantly higher risk of AF recurrence compared with those without (adjusted HR (aHR): 2.29, 95% CI: 1.27 to 4.15, p=0.006). Patients receiving LAAW CFAE ablation had a higher recurrence rate than those receiving LAAW linear ablation (aHR: 3.29, 95% CI 1.42 to 7.63, p=0.006). Multivariable analysis identified that LAAW linear ablation was a strong independent predictor of reduced AF recurrence (HR: 0.13, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.28, p<0.001). Aortic encroachment is a common and significant risk factor for AF recurrence after ablation. When LAAW-LVAs are present, performing LAAW linear ablation might be a highly effective strategy to reduce postablation AF recurrence.

To evaluate if an intervention to improve health literacy, using the risk communication tool 'Your Heart Forecast' and informative e-mails, can lower patients' blood pressure (BP) and total cholesterol to high-density lipoprotein ratio (TC/HDL). A cluster randomised controlled trial. The intervention took place in 17 Danish general practice clinics randomised to either control or intervention at clinic level after invitation of each 25 hypertensive patients by birthdate. Men and women were eligible for inclusion if 35-75 years old, without prior cardiovascular disease (CVD). The final population consisted of 255 patients, 142 intervention and 113 control. The 146 men and 109 women were included between April 2019 and May 2021. The trial ended in March 2022. The intervention consisted of the CVD-risk communication tool 'Your Heart Forecast' at the annual BP consultations plus 1 monthly educational e-mail on lifestyle for 12 months. The control group received the usual care, defined as the annual CVD risk management consultation.Main outcome measures, BP and TC/HDL, were measured at baseline and follow-up after 10-18 months. Patients were divided into groups based on baseline levels and a paired t-test was performed on a pseudorandomised dataset by a blinded statistician. Both groups' most dysregulated patients decreased their BP (p<0.0001, p=0.0002), and the BP decrease in the intervention group was larger. Additionally, the intervention patients with moderately raised BP also decreased their BP significantly (p=0.0133). Both groups saw an increase in BP in the most well-regulated patients. TC/HDL decreased only for the intervention patients with the highest baseline levels (p<0.0001) and increased for all with the lowest ratio (p<0.0001). The intervention lowered BP and TC/HDL in comparison to usual care for patients with dysregulated BP and/or TC/HDL above 4. NCT04058847; Clinicaltrials.gov, registered on 16 August 2019.

Cardiogenic shock (CS) complicating acute myocardial infarction (AMI) carries high mortality. Early revascularisation improves survival, but the effect of structured multidisciplinary care on outcomes remains underexplored. ACT-SHOCK is a service evaluation at a UK tertiary cardiac centre. Between May 2023 and May 2024, 82 patients with AMI-related CS requiring emergent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were identified using protocolised physiological criteria and managed by an Advanced Cardiogenic-Shock Team (ACT). The ACT comprised interventional cardiologists, intensivists, anaesthetists, critical care staff and cardiac physiologists, coordinating PCI and ongoing care. Outcomes were compared with 83 historical controls from the year preceding ACT roll-out, who received standard care without ACT activation. Primary endpoints were 30-day and 1-year all-cause mortality; secondary outcomes included predictors of 30-day mortality.Within the ACT cohort, elevated lactate, critical care admission, invasive ventilation, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) Shock Stage E at first medical contact predicted 1-year mortality. Adjusted analyses showed ACT management was associated with lower 1-year mortality compared with standard care (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.92; p=0.026). Although 30-day mortality was lower in the ACT group, this did not reach statistical significance (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.29; p=0.26). Escalation from coronary care to critical care during the recovery phase occurred more promptly in the ACT group (9.7% vs 2.4%, p=0.09). At 24 hours, a smaller proportion of ACT patients remained in SCAI stages D/E compared with standard care (42% vs 48%; p=0.003). Implementation of physiological criteria to identify CS and activation of a multidisciplinary ACT in a UK tertiary centre was associated with earlier detection and improved 1-year survival in AMI-related CS. These pilot data support further study across multiple UK centres to inform national policy and standardise care pathways.

Aortic dimensions are critical for assessing the risk of acute aortic complications and guiding surgical interventions. Current guidelines define absolute diameter thresholds based largely on Western cohorts, while data on Indian patients remain limited. To address this gap, our study provides a direct, large-scale comparison of aortic diameters between Indian and Dutch individuals to determine whether existing geometry-based surgical guidelines are equally applicable across populations. In this retrospective cohort study, we analysed all consecutive patients who underwent CT imaging between January and December 2022 at SIMS Hospital (India) and Amsterdam University Medical Center (Netherlands). Aortic diameters were measured at five predefined anatomical locations: aortic root, ascending aorta, aortic arch, descending aorta and abdominal aorta. Multivariable linear regression models were used, adjusting for age, sex, height and comorbidities. A total of 3692 patients were included (2000 Indian and 1692 Dutch). Indian patients had a larger aortic root (33.9 ± 4.6 mm vs 31.5 ± 5.4 mm; p<0.001), whereas Dutch patients had significantly larger diameters of the ascending aorta (33.1 ± 5.4 mm vs 30.5 ± 4.3 mm; p<0.001), aortic arch (29.8 ± 4.5 mm vs 26.4 ± 3.7 mm; p<0.001), descending aorta (26.7 ± 4.2 mm vs 23.0 ± 3.9 mm; p<0.001) and abdominal aorta (23.1 ± 5.0 mm vs 21.3 ± 3.4 mm; p<0.001). These differences persisted after adjustment for age, sex, height and comorbidities. In this first global comparison of ascending aortic dimensions between Indian and Dutch patients, we demonstrate substantial geographic heterogeneity. These findings highlight concerns about applying current surgical thresholds to Indian patients with aortopathy and emphasise the need for individualised risk assessment and treatment strategies in this population. Future guidelines should consider population-specific differences in India and incorporate indexed measurements to optimise personalised surgical decision-making.