Tyvaso DPI is a drug-device combination therapy comprised of a small, portable, reusable, breath-powered, dry powder inhaler (DPI) for the delivery of treprostinil. It is approved for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension and pulmonary hypertension associated with interstitial lung disease. Tyvaso DPI utilizes single-use prefilled cartridges to ensure proper dosing. Unlike nebulizer devices, administration of Tyvaso DPI is passive and does not require coordination with the device. The low-flow rate design results in targeted delivery to the peripheral lungs due to minimal drug loss from impaction in the oropharynx. The inert fumaryl diketopiperazine (FDKP) excipient forms microparticles that carry treprostinil into the airways, with a high fraction of the particles in the respirable range. In a clinical study in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension, Tyvaso DPI had similar exposure and pharmacokinetics, low incidence of adverse events, and high patient satisfaction compared with nebulized treprostinil solution. Tyvaso DPI may be considered as a first prostacyclin agent or for those that do not tolerate other prostacyclin formulations, patients with pulmonary comorbidities, patients with mixed Group 1 and Group 3 pulmonary hypertension, or those that prefer an active lifestyle and need a portable, non-invasive treatment. Tyvaso DPI is a patient-preferred, maintenance-free, safe delivery option that may improve patient compliance and adherence.

Technosphere insulin (TI) is aninhaled dry powder ultra-rapid-acting insulin. This report describes the results of the first study of TI in children with type1 diabetes (T1D). Pharmacokinetics (PK) of TI and the effect of TI on circulating glucose concentrations were evaluated in a single-arm study that enrolled children ages 8-17years with T1D for more than 1year, on a stable multiple daily insulin injection (MDI) regimen, and meeting pre-defined pulmonary function testing criteria (at least 70% predicted). To assess PK, subjects received an individualized single preprandial dose of TI (4-12U, in 4-U increments) via oral inhalation, basedon their usual meal-time subcutaneously injected rapid-acting insulin dose and meal content. Serum insulin and blood glucose were measured at -30 to 250min relative to dosing. Twenty-seven children with T1D participated in this single-dose PK study. Mean subject age was 13.3years (59% female; 81.5% White). Meanserum insulin Cmax (maximum concentration) was 77.3, 119.15, and 207.7µU/mL for doses of 4, 8, and 12U, respectively. Tmax occurred at 10.5, 13.9, and 14.6min post-dose for 4, 8, and 12U.Glucose lowering 30-60min post-dose was consistent with the PK profile. Serum insulin rapidly increased post-dose and returned to baseline by 120min. The data suggests the PK of TI in youth with T1D ages 8-17years was similar to that seen in previous adult studies. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02527265.

Pulmonary nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) infection is recognized as a major global health concern due to its rising prevalence worldwide. As an opportunistic pathogen with increasing antibiotics resistance, prolonged systemic dosing with multiple antibiotics remains the primary treatment paradigm. These prolonged treatments, administered predominantly by oral or parenteral routes, often lead to systemic toxicity. A novel inhaled formulation of clofazimine may finally resolve issues of toxicity, thereby providing for improved NTM therapy. Clofazimine inhalation suspension was evaluated in canines to determine toxicity over 28 days of once-a-day dosing. The good laboratory practice (GLP) repeat dosing study evaluated low, mid, and high dosing (2.72 mg/kg and 2.95 mg/kg; 5.45 mg/kg and 5.91 mg/kg; and 10.87 mg/kg and 10.07 mg/kg, average male versus female dosing) of nebulized clofazimine over 30, 60, and 120 min using a jet nebulizer. Toxicokinetic analyses were performed on study days 29, 56, and 84. All three dose levels showed significant residual drug in lung tissue, demonstrating impressive lung loading and long lung residence. Drug concentrations in the lung remained well above the average NTM MIC at all time points, with measurable clofazimine levels at 28 and 56 days postdosing. In contrast, plasma levels of clofazimine were consistently measurable only through 14 days postdosing, with measurements below the limit of quantitation at 56 days postdosing. Clofazimine inhalation suspension may provide an effective therapy for the treatment of NTM infections through direct delivery of antibiotic to the lungs, overcoming the systemic toxicity seen in oral clofazimine treatment for NTM.

Computer Modeling and Simulation (CM&S) provides the opportunity to drastically reduce clinical trial patient burden and advance regulatory decision making. At the suggestion of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), MannKind Corporation and Nudge BG submitted an application to the FDA Model-Informed Drug Development (MIDD) pilot program to support a label change for the initial dose of Afrezza® (insulin human), a novel inhalable insulin with a rapid pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile. The MIDD pilot program demonstrates the FDA's commitment to advancing regulatory science through the adoption of evidence generated by CM&S. A simulation framework was developed based on empirical data. It was used to generate evidence to support the label change. Briefing packages and presentations were prepared for two meetings with the FDA, over a period of four months. The model was thoroughly characterized, determined to be low risk for the question of interest, and submitted along with additional clinical evidence for validation. The FDA found the simulation framework to be helpful in providing insights into the question of interest and provides reasonable glycemic outcome predictions. At the conclusion of the MIDD paired meetings, FDA personnel from the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research review team accepted the simulation and requested additional, traditional clinical evidence to support the proposed label change. In the post-meeting comments, the FDA invited MannKind to submit a proposal for a data package including the CM&S evidence in a Type C meeting for further discussion on the label change. This MIDD pilot experience suggests that CM&S is a credible method for evidence generation. Collaboration between sponsor organizations as well as all stakeholders in the FDA, including proponents of CM&S, can further support regulatory decision-making. The learnings from early participants will allow the program to reach its full potential and thereby ultimately benefit patients, sponsors, and FDA.

The purpose of this study was to construct professional competencies for diabetes technology use in various care settings reflecting the mission of the Association of Diabetes Care & Education Specialists (ADCES). ADCES convened a core team of nationally representative diabetes technology experts to develop professional competencies specifically related to diabetes technology use. A modified Delphi methodology, which comprised 4 rounds, was used for consensus development among these experts. First, experts developed and arrived at a consensus on the initial draft of competencies. They also identified health care professionals and staff essential for effective technology integration in various diabetes care settings. A survey was completed by diabetes technology experts that are members of ADCES. Next, a multidisciplinary focus group was conducted to gain feedback. Finally, the edited competencies were distributed via survey for feedback by diabetes technology experts from various disciplines. One hundred four diabetes technology experts in the United States participated in the final survey, representing various health care professions and clinical settings. A final set of 94 competencies across 7 domains was determined. Modified Delphi methodology is an effective way to utilize multidisciplinary expertise to develop diabetes technology-related competencies for diabetes care professionals and staff in a variety of settings. These competencies align with the mission of ADCES to empower diabetes care and education specialists to expand the horizons of innovative education, management, and support.

Technosphere Insulin (TI) is an ultra-rapid-acting inhaled insulin. This study assessed the mean peak two-hour postprandial glucose concentration with the initial TI dose (dose 1) calculated per the current label (United State Prescribing Information) compared with a ~2× higher dose (dose 2). Secondary objectives were to evaluate hypoglycemia within the two-hour postprandial period, evaluate change in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) before and after the two-hour postprandial period, and monitor for other adverse events. Twenty patients with diabetes, on basal-bolus insulin therapy, received an initial dose 1 of TI followed by the higher dose 2, one to three days later. Subjects received an identical meal for both visits, and TI doses were administered immediately prior to the meal. The higher dose 2 provided significant reductions in mean postprandial glucose excursion (PPGE) in the two-hour postprandial period starting from 45 minutes (P = .008) to 120 minutes (P < .0001). Mean peak glucose was reduced from 228.6 to 179.3 mg/dL (P < .001) at two hours. Two hypoglycemic events (one level 1, one level 2) were observed in a single subject during the two-hour postprandial period with dose 2. There were no significant changes in FEV1 after either dose of TI. The higher dose 2 reduced PPGE versus the current label recommended dose 1 within the two-hour postprandial timeframe without any new safety concerns. When confirmed with a larger study, this higher TI dosing recommendation may help patients and clinicians minimize immediate postprandial hyperglycemia when titrating TI for prandial glucose control.

An appreciation of enzyme kinetic principles can be applied in a number of drug metabolism applications. The concept for this chapter arose from a simple discussion on selecting appropriate time points to most efficiently assess metabolite profiles in a human Phase 1a clinical study (Subheading 4). By considering enzyme kinetics, a logical approach to the issue was derived. The dialog was an important learning opportunity for the participants in the discussion, and we have endeavored to capture this experience with other questions related to determination of Km and Vmax parameters, a consideration of the value of hepatocytes vs. liver microsomes, and enzyme inhibition parameters.

ObjectiveTo compare glycemic efficacy of Technosphere insulin (TI) versus that of insulin aspart (IA), each added to basal insulin, in type 2 diabetes. MethodsThis randomized, 24-week trial included subjects aged from 18 to 80 years who were treated with subcutaneous insulin for 3 months and had glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) levels of 7.0% to 11.5%. After receiving stabilized insulin glargine doses during a 4-week lead in, the subjects were randomized to TI or IA. The primary end point was an HbA1C change from baseline, with the differences analyzed by equivalence analyses. ResultsIn the overall cohort (N = 309; males, 23.3%), mean (SD) age was 58.5 (8.4) years, body mass index was 30.8 (4.7) kg/m2, weight was 82.2 (13.6) kg, and duration of diabetes was 12.2 (7.1) years. An intention-to-treat cohort had 150 subjects randomized to TI (mean [SD] HbA1C: 8.9% [1.1%]) and 154 randomized to IA (mean [SD] HbA1C: 9.0% [1.3%]). At 24 weeks, mean (SD) HbA1C value declined to 7.9% (1.3%) and 7.7% (1.1%) in the TI and IA cohorts, respectively. A treatment difference of 0.26% was not statistically significant, but the predefined equivalency margin was not met. Subjects receiving TI lost 0.78 kg compared to baseline; subjects receiving IA gained 0.23 kg (P =.0007). The incidence of mild/moderate hypoglycemia was lower for the TI cohort, though not statistically significant. ConclusionBoth TI and IA resulted in significant and clinically meaningful HbA1C reductions. TI also resulted in significant and clinically meaningful weight reductions. These data support the use of inhaled insulin as a treatment option for individuals with type 2 diabetes.

Technosphere Insulin (TI) is an inhaled insulin. Studies comparing TI with short-acting insulin analogues provide important insights on efficacy, dosing, and time course of action. Planned enrollment of 230 subjects was limited to 138 due to premature study discontinuation. The primary efficacy endpoint was a noninferiority of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) of 0.4% for TI compared with insulin lispro (LIS) in a 16-week phase 3 randomized clinical trial in type 1 diabetes mellitus. HbA1c values were similar in the TI and LIS groups at the beginning of the trial (7.8% and 7.6%, respectively) and at trial endpoint (7.7% and 7.6%, respectively). Least squares mean changes from baseline were similar between study groups. Glucose values after a standard meal were significantly lower with TI in the first 90 minutes post meal compared with LIS. Mild or moderate hypoglycemia event rates were also significantly lower with TI compared with LIS (5.97 vs 8.01, respectively; P = .0269). Cough was the most commonly reported adverse event with TI. Pulmonary function as measured by forced expiratory volume in 1 second was not different between groups at baseline, 16 weeks, or 4 weeks off study drug. HbA1c was unchanged and overall glucose control was comparable between groups. Treatment with TI resulted in improved post-meal glucose and a lower risk of hypoglycemia compared with LIS.

Background and ObjectiveTechnosphere® Insulin (TI), a human insulin powder for inhalation (Afrezza®; MannKind Corporation, Westlake Village, CA, USA), is an ultra-rapid-acting inhaled insulin indicated to improve postprandial glycemic control in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus (T1DM or T2DM). Because TI is absorbed across the alveolar membrane, the objective of this analysis was to characterize its pulmonary safety.MethodsPooled data from 13 phase 2/3 clinical studies in 5505 patients with T1DM or T2DM treated with TI, Technosphere inhalation powder without insulin (TP; placebo), or active-comparator treatment were analyzed for incidences of respiratory treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), changes in pulmonary function, and lung malignancies. Radiographic changes in the lungs were monitored in a subset of 229 patients.ResultsAmong 3017 patients receiving TI, the median duration of TI exposure was 168 days; median active-comparator and TP exposure durations were 363 and 149 days for 2198 and 290 patients, respectively. Respiratory TEAEs were comparable across treatments, except for a higher incidence of mild cough with TI in active-comparator studies (28.0% vs. 5.2%). Slight reversible declines in pulmonary function from baseline were observed for TI versus TP and active-comparator treatments, including in a subpopulation of patients with retrospectively identified lung dysfunction. Lung malignancies were reported in two patients on active TI therapy with a smoking history. No clinically significant changes from baseline were observed in radiographic images.ConclusionsPulmonary safety assessment of the TI inhalation system did not identify any safety issues in individuals with either T1DM or T2DM.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1007/s40261-020-00958-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.